Objective:
To outline the steps in the ultrasonographic evaluation of Peyronie’s disease and determine its use in the diagnosis, classification and treatment of this disorder.
Design:
Video presentation
Setting:
Outpatient Urology clinic.
Patient(s):
All patients with Peyronie’s disease undergoing penile ultrasonography who signed a written, informed consent for video and audio recording.
Intervention(s):
Alprostadil + papaverine + phentolamine intracavernosal injections, penile ultrasonography, phenylephrine intracavernosal injections.
Main Outcome Measure(s):
Penile plaque classification, penile blood flow and degree of penile curvature.
Result(s):
During the period November 2018-December 2019, 156 patients were evaluated for Peyronie’s disease using ultrasonography, from which 109 patients presened calcified plaques. Out of these, 59 (45.1%) patients were found to have type 2 plaques, making this one the most common type of plaque. The average age in this group of patients was 59.8 ± 6.0 years, the average degree of curvature was 49.4 ± 23.0°, and the average duration of symptoms was 27.2 ± 36.9 months. During the vascular evaluation with Doppler ultrasonography, 23 (14.7%) patients presented PSV 25 < 30 cm3 /s. Degree of curvature was not found to be associated with the severity of calcification (p = 0.17). This video demonstrates the advantages that ultrasonography provides in the evaluation and management of Peyronie’s disease compared to other imaging modalities. It avoids radiation, easily detects plaques and calcification, and is more familiar to urologists. We outline the steps of the procedure; the possible findings during the penile tissue evaluation; the different types, location and size of plaques; the direction of penile curvature and deformity, and the possible findings on Doppler ultrasonography, which can further guide the management of these patients Figs. 1-4, Tables 1-4.
Table 1.
Plaques in Peyronie’s Disease | |
---|---|
Types of plaques | Characteristics |
Type 1 | Tunica albuginea thickening with slight or no shadowing. |
Type 2 | Tunica albuginea with moderate calcification and partial shadowing. |
Type 3 | Tunica albuginea calcification with complete shadowing. |
Pawłowska E, Bianek-Bodzak A. Imaging modalities and clinical assesment in men affected with Peyronie’s disease. Polish J Radiol [Internet]. 2011 Jul [cited 2019 Dec 17];76(3):33–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802839 [1].
Table 4.
Vascular evaluation Vascular parameter |
N (%) |
---|---|
PSV < 25 cm3 /s | 18 (11.5%) |
PSV 25 < 30 cm3 /s | 23 (14.7%) |
EDV > 5 cm3 /s | 12 (7.7%) |
Conclusion
Penile Doppler ultrasound is a useful tool in the evaluation and management of Peyronie’s disease.
Understanding the type of calcification and degree of curvature can aid to decide the management of Peyronie’s disease.
Supplementary Material
Table 2.
Prospective Evaluation of Calcification | |||
---|---|---|---|
Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | |
N (%) | 33 (30.2) | 59 (45. 1) | 17 (15.6) |
Age (years) | 53.8 ± 12.0 | 59.8 ± 6.0 | 55.3 ± 7.9 |
Curvature (degrees) | 36.9 ± 16.0 | 49.4 ± 23.0 | 48.2 ± 23.8 |
Duration of symptoms (months) | 38.8 ± 61.7 | 27.2 ± 36.9 | 17.6 ± 12.6 |
Table 3.
Candidates for Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum | |||
---|---|---|---|
Noncalcified | Calcified | p | |
N (%) | 26 (28.3) | 66 (71. 7) | |
Curvature (degrees) | 46.1 ± 14.7 | 51.2 ± 17.6 | 0.17 |
Duration of symptoms | |||
(months) | 39.5 ± 61.2 | 22.6 ± 30.3 | 0.34 |
Acknowledgments
Funding
None.
Footnotes
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Supplementary materials
The video related to this article can be found online at: doi:10.1016/j.urolvj.2020.100047.
The following is the video related to this article Video 1.
References
- [1].Pawłowska E, Bianek-Bodzak A, Imaging modalities and clinical assesment in men affected with Peyronie’s disease, Polish J. Radiol [Internet] 76 (3) (2011. July) 33–37 [cited 2019 Dec 17] Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802839. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Gelman Joel, et al. , Peyronie’s disease information and examples, The center for reconstructive urology (2019) http://www.centerforreconstructiveurology.org/peyronies-disease/ (Accessed 12 April 2020).
- [3].Gelman Joel, et al. , How to straighten a bent penis - plication, The center for reconstructive urology (2019) http://www.centerforreconstructiveurology.org/peyronies-disease/surgery-plication/ (Accessed 12 April 2020).
- [4].Gelman Joel, et al. , Penis graft surgery to straighten curvature, The center for reconstructive urology (2019) http://www.centerforreconstructiveurology.org/peyronies-disease/surgery-graft/.
- [5].Pramar Madhumita, Masterson John M. Masterson Thomas A. III, The role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of Peyronie’s disease, Current Opinion in Urology 30 (3) (2020) 283–289, doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.