Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OVCA) is one of the most common types of cancer in women worldwide. Recent studies have focused on the presence and effect of somatic mutations in patients with OVCA; however, studies on the roles of mutations located in the untranslated regions (UTR) of genes in OVCA remain limited. In the present study, a frequent somatic mutation in the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH) 3′UTR was identified using transcriptome sequencing of 120 pairs of OVCA tissue samples. The mutant GAPDH 3′UTR promoted tumor growth and cell motility. Furthermore, the mutation in the GAPDH 3′UTR significantly downregulated the levels of mature miR-125b by creating a new miR-125b binding site. Finally, STAT3 levels were increased in SKOV3 cells stably expressing the mutant GADPH 3′UTR, which is a critical target gene of miR-125b. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the mutation located in GAPDH 3′UTR promoted OVCA growth and development by sponging miR-125b and thereby affecting STAT3 expression levels.
Keywords: GAPDH, somatic mutation, 3′untranslated region, ovarian cancer, miR-125b
Introduction
Ovarian cancer (OVCA) is one of the leading causes of cancer-associated deaths among women (1,2). According to the World Health Organization, OVCA accounts for 150,000 deaths annually worldwide (3). Therefore, there is an urgent need to better understand the molecular mechanisms of tumor growth and development of OVCA.
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is a key regulatory enzyme, which catalyzes the oxidative phosphorylation of glycerol-3-phosphate during glycolysis. It is one of the most extensively investigated housekeeping genes, and is widely used as an internal control for the analysis of gene expression levels. However, mounting evidence now recognizes GAPDH as a multifunctional protein involved in a range of biological processes, including membrane fusion and transport (4,5), apoptosis (6), DNA repair (7), DNA replication and regulation of transcription and translation (8). GAPDH expression is modulated by serum, epidermal growth factor and retinoic acid (9,10). In addition, it has been reported that miRNA-mediated regulation is partly responsible for the variability in GAPDH expression (11). Recent studies have demonstrated that GAPDH expression is significantly upregulated in several types of cancer, such as renal (12,13), breast (14) and nasopharyngeal cancer (15). A dysregulation of GAPDH expression may potentially be associated with tumorigenesis and malignancy.
Recently, studies have suggested that the genomes of the majority of cancers in adults contain thousands of somatic mutations (16), and mutations in the 3′untranslated region (3′UTR) may mediate oncogene activation or tumor suppressor inactivation by altering microRNA (miRNA/miR)-binding efficiency (17,18). miRNAs are small, endogenous and non-coding RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level, by binding to the 3′UTR of their target mRNAs (19). It has also been reported that mRNAs, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and transcribed pseudogenes can act as competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) which co-regulate each other's expression by competing for shared microRNAs (20,21), and the 3′UTR of mRNA alone can act as a ceRNA (22–25). Dysregulation of the expression of various miRNAs has been identified in several types of cancer, and have been demonstrated to contribute to the malignancy and tumorigenesis of cancer (26–28).
In the present study, it was demonstrated that the expression of GAPDH mRNA was upregulated in OVCA tissues, and a somatic mutation in the 3′UTR of GAPDH was identified, which was located in the seed sequence of miR-125b. The mutant GAPDH 3′UTR promoted tumor growth and cell motility by directly binding to miR-125b, thus upregulating the expression of the miR-125b target gene, STAT3, in OVCA.
Materials and methods
Clinical tissue specimens and cell lines
All experimental protocols in the present study were approved by The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China). Between January 2015 and 2019, a total of 120 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with OVCA were enrolled in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: OVCA patients who were scheduled for cytoreductive surgery; patients aged above 18 years. Any patient who was in pregnancy, or who was diagnosed with a malignant tumor of another organ and tissue was excluded. The clinicopathological characteristics of these 120 OVCA patients are documented in Table I. All patients included in this study provided written informed consent prior to surgery. The cell lines used in this study were, SKOV3, OVCAR3 and 293T cells, and were all obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. 293T cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C. SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS under the same incubation conditions.
Table I.
Clinicopathological characteristics | Data |
---|---|
Age (years) | |
Median age (years) | 54 |
≥60, n (%) | 54 (45.00) |
<60, n (%) | 66 (55.00) |
BMI, kg/m2 | |
Mean (range) | 21.34 (18.9-28.6) |
FIGO stage, n (%) | |
I–II | 74 (61.67) |
III–IV | 46 (38.33) |
Histological type, n (%) | |
Serous | 71 (59.17) |
Clear cell | 12 (10.00) |
Mucinous | 17 (14.16) |
Endometrioid | 20 (16.67) |
OVCA, ovarian cancer; BMI, body mass index; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Transcriptome library preparation and sequencing
Total RNA was extracted from cancer and normal tissues using TRIzol® (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.). RNA degradation and contamination were assessed by running a sample on a 1% agarose gel. RNA purity and concentration were detected using a NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (Implen GmbH) and a Qubit® RNA Assay kit with a Qubit® 2.0 Flurometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), respectively. RNA integrity was assessed using an RNA Nano 6000 Assay kit with a Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Subsequently, a total of 3 µg of RNA from each sample was used to construct the Illumina sequencing library with a NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep kit for Illumina® (New England BioLabs, Inc.). The index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample using a TruSeq PE Cluster kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumina, Inc.), and the prepared libraries were sequenced using an Illumina Hiseq® 2500 platform (Illumina, Inc.).
Generation of a stable cell line
The primer sequences for the amplification of GAPDH 3′UTR-WT or the mutant (CCTAG to CCTCAG) were as follows: GAPDH 3′UTR forward, 5′-CCAGCAAGAGCACAAGAGGA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGGTTGAGCACAGGGTACTT-3′. GAPDH 3′UTR-MUT (CCT AG to CCTCAG) and control DNA fragments were cloned into a pLKO.1-EGFP lentivirus vector. 293T cells were used for generation of lentiviral particles by transfecting the expression vectors and package vectors with PEI. A total of 72 h after transfection, supernatants containing the lentiviral particles were harvested, and the remaining cells were removed by concentration. For lentiviral infection, SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cells were seeded 1 day prior to infection, and cells were infected with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20 and 30, respectively. The lentivirus was diluted in RPMI-1640 medium containing Polybrene (10 µg/ml) and added to the cells for 24 h at 37°C. Subsequently, the virus-containing medium was replaced with fresh supplemented RPMI-1640 medium, and the successfully infected cells were isolated using FACS based on eGFP fluorescence.
RNA transfection
miR-125b mimics, Ago2 small interfering (si)RNA and their corresponding negative controls (NCs) were purchased form Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). miR-125b mimics, Ago2 siRNA and NC at a final concentration of 50 nM were used for transfection. The sequences of the Ago2 siRNAs used were as follows: Ago2-siRNA-1, 5′-GCCAGTAATCGAGTTTGTT-3′; Ago2-siRNA-2, 5′-GGTACCACCTGGTGGATAA-3′; and Ago2-siRNA-3, 5′-GCAGAAACACACCTACCTT-3′.
RNA extraction and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR
TRIzol® reagent (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.) was used to isolate total RNA. A total of 2 µg of each RNA sample was reverse transcribed into cDNA using FastQuant RT Super mix (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.). qPCR was performed on a Bio-Rad MiniOpticon Real-Time PCR system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) using a SYBR Green PCR Master mix (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.). A Bugle-Loop™ miRNA qPCR kit (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.) was used to quantify miR-125b and U6. Hsa-mir-125b-1_1_PR miScript Precursor Assay (Qiagen GmbH) was used for quantification of precursor miR-125b. The primer sequences were as follows: GAPDH forward, 5′-AGCCACAATCGCTCAGACAC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC-3′; Ago2 forward, 5′-CCTCCCATGTTTACAAGTCG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCTTTGTCCTGCCACAATG-3′; STAT3 forward, 5′-CATATGCGGCCAGCAAAGAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-ATACCTGCTCTGAAGAAACT-3′; GUSB forward, 5′-AGCGTGGAGCAAGACAGTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCTGCATAGGGGTAGTGGCT-3′; and Pri-miR-125b forward, 5′-TGAACCTCGAACAGAAATTGCC-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCCACCAAATTTCCAGGATGC-3′.
Western blotting
Total cellular proteins were solubilized in RIPA lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and 1 mM PMSF. Proteins were loaded on a 10% SDS gel, resolved using SDS-PAGE and subsequently transferred electrophoretically to a PVDF membrane (EMD Millipore). The membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat-dried milk at room temperature for 30–60 min, and subsequently incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C at the following dilutions: GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.; cat. no. sc-25778) at 1:1,000, Ago2 (Abcam; cat. no. ab57113) at 1:2,000, STAT3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. cat. no. sc-8019) at 1:300, anti-human β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.; cat. no. 4970) at 1:1,000. Subsequently, the membranes were washed and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.; cat. no. 7074) at a dilution of 1:2,000. Following several washes, signals were visualized using an ECL system (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.). β-actin was used as the loading control. Western blot protein grayscale values were detected and analyzed by ImageJ (1.48V; NIH).
Luciferase assay
For the luciferase assays, the WT and mutant GAPDH 3′UTR, and the WT and mutant (CTCAGGGAtoCTACTAGA) STAT3 3′UTR were amplified by PCR. The primer sequences for the amplification of STAT3 3′UTR-WT and STAT3 3′UTR-MUT were as follows: STAT3 3′UTR forward, 5′-ACCTGGCCTTTGGTGTTGAA-3′ and reverse: 5′-GCTGAGGCAAGGTGGTTTTG-3′. The DNA fragments were cloned into a pGL3 plasmid 3′ to the firefly luciferase gene. A total of 4×104 293T cells were co-transfected with 200 ng of microRNA mimics, 200 ng of one of the pGL3 firefly luciferase constructs and 20 ng of pGL3 Renilla luciferase construct, which was used as the normalization control. After 48 h, cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega Corporation), according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay
Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 2×103 cells/well in 100 µl culture medium. A total of 10 µl CCK-8 reagent (Beijing Transgen Biotech Co., Ltd.) was added at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 or 72 h. The plates were further cultured for 2 h. Cell viability was assessed by measuring the optical density (OD) absorbance at a wavelength of 450 nm using a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc.).
Wound healing assays
Cells were cultured to 80% confluence in 6-well culture plates and a wound was created using a 200-µl pipette tip. Subsequently, the cells were washed once with fresh medium to remove the non-adherent cells. Wounds were imaged at 0 and 24 h and the width of scratch were measured using ImageJ Software (1.48V; NIH).
Cell migration and invasion assays
Cells were resuspended in 200 µl serum-free RPMI-1640 medium and were plated onto either a BD BioCoat™ Matrigel™ Invasion Chamber (BD Biosciences) for invasion assays, or onto a BD Falcon (uncoated) Chamber for migration assays. For both assays, supplemented medium containing 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. The chambers were processed after 24 h according to the manufacturer's protocol, and migrated cells were stained with Hoechst at room temperature for 10 min. Cells were examined using a fluorescence microscope with 20× objective (Nikon Corporation).
microRNA stability analysis
SKOV3 cells were transfected with control WT or mutant GAPDH 3′UTR constructs for 24 h. Subsequently, actinomycin-D was added and cells were further cultured for 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.). The expression of miR-125b was detected using RT-qPCR.
RNA binding immunoprecipitation
Cells were lysed for at least 20 min on ice. The cell lysates were collected following centrifugation (12,000 × g for 10 min). Cell lysates were incubated with an anti-Ago2 antibody (Abcam; cat. no. ab57113) at a dilution of 1:200, or isotype control IgG (Sigma-Aldrich: Merck KGaA) at 4°C for 2 h. The RNA-protein immunocomplexes were enriched using protein A/G Plus agarose beads. Subsequently, the beads were washed and the complexes were treated with DNase I and Proteinase K. RT-qPCR was performed to assess the RNA isolated from the immunoprecipitation material.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean of the indicated number of measurements. The differences between groups were analyzed by Student's t-test. Comparisons between multiple groups were performed using one-way ANOVA analysis of variance followed by the Tukey's post-hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Identification of a frequent somatic mutation in the 3′UTR of GAPDH
Transcriptome sequencing was performed on the OVCA samples and their matching adjacent normal tissues from 120 patients to analyze the presence and frequency of mutations of housekeeping genes. A summary of the top 10 housekeeping genes with a high mutation rate in the UTR is shown in Fig. 1A. The gene with the highest frequency of non-coding mutations in the UTR was GAPDH, which harbored 6 mutations in 22/120 (18.3%) OVCA tissues (Table SI). Additionally, a somatic mutation located in GAPDH 3′UTR (NM_001289745.2:c.*1325_*1326insC) occurred most frequently (9.17%). In contrast, the matching adjacent normal tissues did not contain this somatic mutation.
The expression of GAPDH in OVCA tissues was assessed using RT-qPCR. As 18S and GUSB are reliable reference genes to determine the profile of gene expression in OVCA (29), they were used as the internal controls in the present study. The results showed that GAPDH mRNA levels were significantly upregulated in OVCA tissues (Fig. 1B). This finding was supported by data from the Oncomine database (oncomine.org/resource/main.html). In contrast to the GAPDH mRNA expression patterns, the expression levels of GAPDH protein did not differ significantly between the cancerous and non-cancerous tissues (Fig. S1).
Mutant GAPDH 3′UTR promotes cell growth and cell motility of OVCA
To determine the biological roles of the effect of the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR (NM_001289745.2:c.*1325_*1326insC) on OVCA, the OVCA cell lines SKOV3 and OVCAR3 stably expressing WT or mutant GAPDH 3′UTR were constructed. A CCK-8 assay demonstrated that the mutant but not the WT GAPDH 3′UTR-overexpressing OVCA cells exhibited significantly increased cell growth compared with the control cells (Fig. 2A and B). Furthermore, the effect of the GAPDH 3′UTR on cell motility of OVCA cells was assessed using wound healing and Transwell assays. The results showed that overexpression of the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR in OVCA cells significantly promoted migration as the wound closure rate was increased (Fig. 2C and D). Consistent with this result, Transwell assays also showed that the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR significantly increased the migratory and invasive capacity of OVCA cells (Fig. 2E-G). Taken together, these results suggest that mutant GAPDH 3′UTR promoted cell growth and cell motility of OVCA cells.
Mutation in GAPDH 3′UTR results in the creation of a miR-125b binding site
To further analyze the molecular mechanisms of the frequent mutation in GAPDH 3′UTR, bioinformatics algorithms were used to predict miRNAs which may interact with the mutation site, including miRDB (30) and miRcode (31). The results of the alignment analysis suggested that the mutated sequence matches a sequence located in the ‘seed region’ of the binding sites of miR-125b (Fig. 3A). The structure and free energy of potential binding site interactions between miR-125b with GAPDH mRNA 3′UTR (WT and mutant) were analyzed using RNAhybrid (32). The results showed that the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR had a stronger affinity for miR-125b compared with the WT (Fig. 3B). To further confirm the binding activation of GAPDH 3′UTR with miR-125b, luciferase reporter plasmids with the WT or mutant GAPDH 3′UTR were constructed and co-transfected with miR-125b mimics in 293T cells. The results showed that only when transfected with the mutant construct was the activity of luciferase significantly reduced by miR-125b (Fig. 3C). Based on these results, it was concluded that the frequent mutation in GAPDH 3′UTR created a new binding site for miR-125b.
Mutation in GAPDH 3′UTR results in the downregulation of mature miR-125b levels in OVCA cells
Previous studies have shown that miR-125b is dysregulated in different types of cancer (33–36). The expression of miR-125b was quantified in 30 paired normal and OVCA tissues using RT-qPCR, and it was found that miR-125b was significantly downregulated in the OVCA tissues (Fig. 4A). This finding is supported by several recent studies (33,37). Additionally, miR-125b levels may have been regulated by the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR in OVCA cells. Expression of the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR significantly decreased the levels of mature miR-125b, whereas neither pre-miRNA nor pri-miRNA levels were altered (Fig. 4B and C); and the stability of mature miR-125b was significantly decreased in cells stably expressing the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR following inhibition of intracellular RNA transcription with actinomycin D treatment (Fig. 4D). These phenomena were abrogated in cells with the WT 3′UTR of GAPDH (Fig. 4B-D). Additionally, the mature miR-125b level in the OVCA mutant tissues (NM_001289745.2:c.*1325_*1326insC) and OVCA wild-type tissues was analyzed. The results showed there was no difference between these two group, and the main reason was the low abundance of GAPDH mutation (Fig. S2). Together, these results suggest that the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR reduced the relative levels of mature miR-125b, and this effect was not associated with transcriptional regulation or miRNA precursor processing.
Mutant GAPDH 3′UTR regulates miR-125b levels in an Ago2-dependent manner
It was previously reported that miRNAs guide argonaute RISC catalytic component 2 (Ago2) protein to distinct target sites on mRNAs (38). Therefore, the involvement of Ago2 on the interaction of miR-125b and GAPDH 3′UTR-MUT was assessed. Subsequently, to further explore the potential mechanisms involved, an anti-Ago2 RIP experiment was performed on extracts of SKOV3 cells (stably expressing mutant GAPDH 3′UTR). The mutant GAPDH 3′UTR fragment and miR-125b were enriched in Ago2-containing complexes (Fig. 5A). In addition, to investigate the role of Ago2 on the biological function of the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR, Ago2 expression was knocked down using siRNA (Fig. 5B and C). Knockdown of Ago2 partially inhibited the degradation of miR-125b induced by the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR (Fig. 5D). Previous studies showed that miRNAs act as miRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes containing Ago2, an important component of RNA induced silencing complex (RISC). The above results showed that miR-125b and the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR were involved in a RISC, suggesting that the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR may function as a sponge of miR-125b in OVCA cells.
Mutant GAPDH 3′UTR promotes cancer development by sponging miR-125b, thereby regulating STAT3 expression in OVCA cells
To investigate whether the effects of the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR on OVCA development were mediated by miR-125b, OVCA cells stably expressing the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR were transfected with miR-125b mimics. Transfection of miR-125b mimics abrogated the tumor promoting effects induced by mutant GAPDH 3′UTR, which suggested that the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR promoted cancer development by regulating miR-125b (Fig. 6A-C). To examine the effects of miR-125b on the mechanisms and functions of the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR, direct target genes of miR-125b were selected using TargetScan. The results showed that STAT3 may be an effective target gene. Luciferase reporter assays were performed to assess whether STAT3 directly interacted with miR-125b. The results demonstrated that miR-125b reduced luciferase activity in the pGL3-STAT3-3′UTR-WT transfected cells (Fig. 6D). To determine the underlying relationship between GAPDH 3′UTR and STAT3, the expression of STAT3 was assessed in SKOV3 cells stably expressing GAPDH 3′UTR. The results showed that overexpression of the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR upregulated STAT3 expression (Fig. 6E and F). As it has been reported that elevated STAT3 expression in OVCA contributes to tumorigenesis and progression (39,40), it was concluded that the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR facilitates OVCA cell growth and cell motility by sponging miR-125b and thus upregulating STAT3 levels.
Discussion
Recently, the genomic sequencing of cancer tissues has provided evidence that the majority of cancer genomes contain thousands of somatic mutations, and some of these somatic mutations may exhibit a functional effect on tumorigenesis and metastasis (16,41,42). In the present study, GAPDH mRNA expression levels were upregulated in ovarian cancer (OVCA) tissues, and a frequent somatic mutation in the 3′UTR of GAPDH (NM_001289745.2:c.*1325_*1326insC) was identified. The mutant GAPDH 3′UTR significantly promoted OVCA cell growth and cell motility, whereas the WT GAPDH 3′UTR had no effect on these biological processes.
Numerous studies have shown that somatic mutations in the 3′UTR may promote tumor progression by altering miRNA targeting efficiency and consequently affecting miRNA-mRNA interactions (18,43,44). To assess the functional mechanisms of a frequent somatic mutation located in the 3′UTR of GAPDH, its effect on miRNA binding was analyzed. The results showed that the mutation created a new binding site for miR-125b. RT-qPCR was performed on OVCA cell lines stably expressing WT or mutant GAPDH 3′UTR, and the results showed that the mutant 3′UTR resulted in a ~40% decrease in mature miR-125b levels, and this regulation was dependent on the expression of Ago2. These results suggest that the GAPDH 3′UTR mutation, which is able to bind to miR-125b target sites, may impair miRNA-mRNA interaction and sponge miR-125b.
It was reported that miR-125b was involved in the initiation and progression of several types of cancer, such as urothelial tumors (45), liver (46,47), bladder cancer (48) and ovarian cancer (33). miR-125b may act as a tumor suppressor, inhibiting invasion, migration and angiogenesis (48,49). In the present study, miR-125b was downregulated in OVCA tissues compared with the matching normal tissues. Transfection of miR-125b mimics suppressed OVCA cell growth, and decreased cell motility. In addition, transfection of miR-125b mimics counteracted the tumor promoting effects induced by the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR. Taken together, these results indicated that the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR promoted the development of OVCA by sponging miR-125b.
Several recent studies have reported that mRNAs, transcribed pseudogenes and other RNAs may bind to miRNAs and act as potent miRNA sponges (50–52). These molecules have been termed competitive endogenous RNAs (20). ceRNAs can sequester miRNAs, thereby protecting the target RNAs of the respective miRNA from repression (23). In the present study, the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR regulated miR-125b levels in an Ago2-dependent manner, which suggested that the mutant GAPDH may act as a ceRNA. Bioinformatics algorithms and a luciferase reporter assay identified STAT3 as the target of miR-125b. Moreover, this finding was supported by several recent studies (53,54). To further determine the effect of the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR on miR-125b-mediated regulation of STAT3, the expression levels of STAT3 in OVCA cells stably expressing GAPDH 3′UTR were assessed. Overexpression of the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR resulted in a significant increase in STAT3 levels. Several studies have shown that STAT3 levels are elevated in several different types of cancer, and it is a critical regulator of numerous cellular processes, including proliferation, invasion and metastasis (55–57). Therefore, the mutant GAPDH 3′UTR may promote tumor growth and cell motility through increasing the expression of STAT3.
In conclusion, the primary finding of the present study was that mutations in GAPDH 3′UTR promoted development of OVCA by creating a new miR-125b binding site, thereby promoting oncogenic STAT3 expression in ovarian cancer.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Research Fund for Academician Lin He New Medicine for the financial support of this study, and Genex Health Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) for their assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Funding
The study was supported by grants from Research Fund for Academician Lin He New Medicine.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
PL, YZ and HH contributed to the design of this study. PL, YZ, TC, XS and HH performed the experiments, and analyzed and interpreted the data. PL, YZ and HH wrote the manuscript. XS revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China), and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Glaser PE, Gross RW. Rapid plasmenylethanolamine-selective fusion of membrane bilayers catalyzed by an isoform of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase: Discrimination between glycolytic and fusogenic roles of individual isoforms. Biochemistry. 1995;34:12193–12203. doi: 10.1021/bi00038a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tisdale EJ, Kelly C, Artalejo CR. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase interacts with Rab2 and plays an essential role in endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport exclusive of its glycolytic activity. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:54046–54052. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409472200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hara MR, Snyder SH. Nitric oxide-GAPDH-Siah: A novel cell death cascade. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2006;26:527–538. doi: 10.1007/s10571-006-9011-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baxi MD, Vishwanatha JK. Uracil DNA-glycosylase/glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase is an Ap4A binding protein. Biochemistry. 1995;34:9700–9707. doi: 10.1021/bi00030a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zheng L, Roeder RG, Luo Y. S phase activation of the histone H2B promoter by OCA-S, a coactivator complex that contains GAPDH as a key component. Cell. 2003;114:255–266. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00552-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barroso I, Benito B, Garcí-Jiménez C, Hernández A, Obregón MJ, Santisteban P. Norepinephrine, tri-iodothyronine and insulin upregulate glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA during Brown adipocyte differentiation. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999;141:169–179. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1410169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Valenti MT, Bertoldo F, Dalle Carbonare L, Azzarello G, Zenari S, Zanatta M, Balducci E, Vinante O, Lo Cascio V. The effect of bisphosphonates on gene expression: GAPDH as a housekeeping or a new target gene? BMC Cancer. 2006;6:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sikand K, Singh J, Ebron JS, Shukla GC. Housekeeping gene selection advisory: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β-actin are targets of miR-644a. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bjerregaard H, Pedersen S, Kristensen SR, Marcussen N. Reference genes for gene expression analysis by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of renal cell carcinoma. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2011;20:212–217. doi: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e318212e0a9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ma Y, Dai H, Kong X, Wang L. Impact of thawing on reference gene expression stability in renal cell carcinoma samples. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2012;21:157–163. doi: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e31824d3435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Majidzadeh-A K, Esmaeili R, Abdoli N. TFRC and ACTB as the best reference genes to quantify Urokinase plasminogen activator in breast cancer. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:215. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guo Y, Chen JX, Yang S, Fu XP, Zhang Z, Chen KH, Huang Y, Li Y, Xie Y, Mao YM. Selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression study in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2010;31:1487–1494. doi: 10.1038/aps.2010.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stratton MR. Exploring the genomes of cancer cells: Progress and promise. Science. 2011;331:1553–1558. doi: 10.1126/science.1204040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nicoloso MS, Sun H, Spizzo R, Kim H, Wickramasinghe P, Shimizu M, Wojcik SE, Ferdin J, Kunej T, Xiao L, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms inside microRNA target sites influence tumor susceptibility. Cancer Res. 2010;70:2789–2798. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang Y, Du X, Zhou Z, Jiang J, Zhang Z, Ye L, Hong H. A gain-of-function ACTC1 3′UTR mutation that introduces a miR-139-5p target site may be associated with a dominant familial atrial septal defect. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25404. doi: 10.1038/srep25404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Flynt AS, Lai EC. Biological principles of microRNA-mediated regulation: Shared themes amid diversity. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:831–842. doi: 10.1038/nrg2455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Salmena L, Poliseno L, Tay Y, Kats L, Pandolfi PP. A ceRNA hypothesis: The Rosetta stone of a hidden RNA language? Cell. 2011;146:353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tay Y, Rinn J, Pandolfi PP. The multilayered complexity of ceRNA crosstalk and competition. Nature. 2014;505:344–352. doi: 10.1038/nature12986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fang L, Du WW, Yang X, Chen K, Ghanekar A, Levy G, Yang W, Yee AJ, Lu WY, Xuan JW, et al. Versican 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) functions as a ceRNA in inducing the development of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating miRNA activity. FASEB J. 2013;27:907–919. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-220905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Karreth FA, Tay Y, Perna D, Ala U, Tan SM, Rust AG, DeNicola G, Webster KA, Weiss D, Perez-Mancera PA, et al. In vivo identification of tumor-suppressive PTEN ceRNAs in an oncogenic BRAF-induced mouse model of melanoma. Cell. 2011;147:382–395. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee DY, Shatseva T, Jeyapalan Z, Du WW, Deng Z, Yang BB. A 3′-untranslated region (3′UTR) induces organ adhesion by regulating miR-199a* functions. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sumazin P, Yang X, Chiu HS, Chung WJ, Iyer A, Llobet-Navas D, Rajbhandari P, Bansal M, Guarnieri P, Silva J, Califano A. An extensive microRNA-mediated network of RNA-RNA interactions regulates established oncogenic pathways in glioblastoma. Cell. 2011;147:370–381. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:857–866. doi: 10.1038/nrc1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Croce CM. Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:704–714. doi: 10.1038/nrg2634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stahlhut C, Slack FJ. MicroRNAs and the cancer phenotype: Profiling, signatures and clinical implications. Genome Med. 2013;5:111. doi: 10.1186/gm516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li YL, Ye F, Hu Y, Lu WG, Xie X. Identification of suitable reference genes for gene expression studies of human serous ovarian cancer by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem. 2009;394:110–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang J, Yu H, Ye L, Jin L, Yu M, Lv Y. Integrated regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs and targeted genes involved in colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:517–529. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jeggari A, Marks DS, Larsson E. miRcode: A map of putative microRNA target sites in the long non-coding transcriptome. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2062–2063. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rehmsmeier M, Steffen P, Hochsmann M, Giegerich R. Fast and effective prediction of microRNA/target duplexes. RNA. 2004;10:1507–1517. doi: 10.1261/rna.5248604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ying X, Wei K, Lin Z, Cui Y, Ding J, Chen Y, Xu B. MicroRNA-125b suppresses ovarian cancer progression via suppression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathway by targeting the SET protein. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;39:501–510. doi: 10.1159/000445642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vriens MR, Weng J, Suh I, Huynh N, Guerrero MA, Shen WT, Duh QY, Clark OH, Kebebew E. MicroRNA expression profiling is a potential diagnostic tool for thyroid cancer. Cancer. 2012;118:3426–3432. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jia HY, Wang YX, Yan WT, Li HY, Tian YZ, Wang SM, Zhao HL. MicroRNA-125b functions as a tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:8762–8774. doi: 10.3390/ijms13078762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Henson BJ, Bhattacharjee S, O'Dee DM, Feingold E, Gollin SM. Decreased expression of miR-125b and miR-100 in oral cancer cells contributes to malignancy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2009;48:569–582. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Iorio MV, Visone R, Di Leva G, Donati V, Petrocca F, Casalini P, Taccioli C, Volinia S, Liu CG, Alder H, et al. MicroRNA signatures in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8699–8707. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Meister G, Landthaler M, Patkaniowska A, Dorsett Y, Teng G, Tuschl T. Human Argonaute2 mediates RNA cleavage targeted by miRNAs and siRNAs. Mol Cell. 2004;15:185–197. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Saini U, Naidu S, ElNaggar AC, Bid HK, Wallbillich JJ, Bixel K, Bolyard C, Suarez AA, Kaur B, Kuppusamy P, et al. Elevated STAT3 expression in ovarian cancer ascites promotes invasion and metastasis: A potential therapeutic target. Oncogene. 2017;36:168–181. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wen W, Liang W, Wu J, Kowolik CM, Buettner R, Scuto A, Hsieh MY, Hong H, Brown CE, Forman SJ, et al. Targeting JAK1/STAT3 signaling suppresses tumor progression and metastasis in a peritoneal model of human ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:3037–3048. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Boehm JS, Hahn WC. Towards systematic functional characterization of cancer genomes. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:487–498. doi: 10.1038/nrg3013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chin L, Andersen JN, Futreal PA. Cancer genomics: From discovery science to personalized medicine. Nat Med. 2011;17:297–303. doi: 10.1038/nm.2323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wu W, Wu L, Zhu M, Wang Z, Wu M, Li P, Nie Y, Lin X, Hu J, Eskilsson E, et al. miRNA mediated noise making of 3′UTR mutations in cancer. Genes (Basel) 2018;9(pii):E545. doi: 10.3390/genes9110545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lopes-Ramos CM, Barros BP, Koyama FC, Carpinetti PA, Pezuk J, Doimo NTS, Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Parmigiani RB. E2F1 somatic mutation within miRNA target site impairs gene regulation in colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0181153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Veerla S, Lindgren D, Kvist A, Frigyesi A, Staaf J, Persson H, Liedberg F, Chebil G, Gudjonsson S, Borg A, et al. MiRNA expression in urothelial carcinomas: Important roles of miR-10a, miR-222, miR-125b, miR-7 and miR-452 for tumor stage and metastasis, and frequent homozygous losses of miR-31. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:2236–2242. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Alpini G, Glaser SS, Zhang JP, Francis H, Han Y, Gong J, Stokes A, Francis T, Hughart N, Hubble L, et al. Regulation of placenta growth factor by microRNA-125b in hepatocellular cancer. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1339–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhou JN, Zeng Q, Wang HY, Zhang B, Li ST, Nan X, Cao N, Fu CJ, Yan XL, Jia YL, et al. MicroRNA-125b attenuates epithelial-mesenchymal transitions and targets stem-like liver cancer cells through small mothers against decapentaplegic 2 and 4. Hepatology. 2015;62:801–815. doi: 10.1002/hep.27887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Han Y, Liu Y, Zhang H, Wang T, Diao R, Jiang Z, Gui Y, Cai Z. Hsa-miR-125b suppresses bladder cancer development by down-regulating oncogene SIRT7 and oncogenic long non-coding RNA MALAT1. FEBS Lett. 2013;587:3875–3882. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xu N, Zhang L, Meisgen F, Harada M, Heilborn J, Homey B, Grandér D, Ståhle M, Sonkoly E, Pivarcsi A. MicroRNA-125b down-regulates matrix metallopeptidase 13 and inhibits cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:29899–29908. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.391243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cesana M, Cacchiarelli D, Legnini I, Santini T, Sthandier O, Chinappi M, Tramontano A, Bozzoni I. A long noncoding RNA controls muscle differentiation by functioning as a competing endogenous RNA. Cell. 2011;147:358–369. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tay Y, Kats L, Salmena L, Weiss D, Tan SM, Ala U, Karreth F, Poliseno L, Provero P, Di Cunto F, et al. Coding-independent regulation of the tumor suppressor PTEN by competing endogenous mRNAs. Cell. 2011;147:344–357. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Poliseno L, Salmena L, Zhang J, Carver B, Haveman WJ, Pandolfi PP. A coding-independent function of gene and pseudogene mRNAs regulates tumour biology. Nature. 2010;465:1033–1038. doi: 10.1038/nature09144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jin XJ, Chen XJ, Zhang ZF, Hu WS, Ou RY, Li S, Xue JS, Chen LL, Hu Y, Zhu H. Long noncoding RNA SNHG12 promotes the progression of cervical cancer via modulating miR-125b/STAT3 axis. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:6624–6632. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu LH, Li H, Li JP, Zhong H, Zhang HC, Chen J, Xiao T. miR-125b suppresses the proliferation and migration of osteosarcoma cells through down-regulation of STAT3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;416:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.10.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bromberg J, Darnell JE., Jr The role of STATs in transcriptional control and their impact on cellular function. Oncogene. 2000;19:2468–2473. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Darnell JE. Validating Stat3 in cancer therapy. Nat Med. 2005;11:595–596. doi: 10.1038/nm0605-595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Levy DE, Darnell JE., Jr Stats: Transcriptional control and biological impact. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:651–662. doi: 10.1038/nrm909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.