Mechanistic investigations of antitumor activity of a Rhodamine B-oleanolic acid derivative bioconjugate

Abstract

Cancer remains a major health problem worldwide due to its high mortality rate. New therapeutic options highlight the importance of discovering new compounds that target the tumor microenvironment, interrupt angiogenesis and act selectively. The present study assessed the antitumor effect and investigated the mechanism of action of a rhodamine B-conjugated oleanolic acid derivative (RhodOA). Consequently, the compound was tested on different human tumor cell lines (A375 melanoma, A549 lung adenocarcinoma and MDA-MB-231 breast adenocarcinoma) and on a non-tumor cell line HaCaT human keratinocyte. RhodOA produced a dose-dependent decrease in tumor cell viability especially in the melanoma cells while affecting the keratinocytes less. In melanoma cells, RhodOA reduced cell migration and produced condensation of cell nuclei and of actin fibers. Furthermore, an impairment in melanoma cell mitochondrial function was observed, while the mitochondrial function of keratinocytes was left intact. In the in ovo chorioallantoic membrane model, RhodOA elicited antiangiogenic effect, without showing irritation effect on the membrane. The study provides information on the selective antitumor effect of the derivative and its ability to inhibit cellular respiration, therefore RhodOA can be classified as ‘MITOCAN’.

Introduction

Cancer remains a challenging public health issue due to its high mortality rate. Statistics show that in 2018 over 3 million new cancer cases and more than one million cancer-related deaths were recorded in Europe (1). Research in the field currently focuses on finding new anti-tumor therapies with minimal adverse effects, one of the main research directions consisting of exploitation of natural occurring compounds. While conventional cancer treatment is associated with immunosuppression and the occurrence of infections, new targeted antitumor therapies induce other severe side effects such as inflammation and autoimmunity (2). Therefore, the struggle to find new therapeutic approaches with high selectivity and targeted action is imperative in order to reduce the occurrence of systemic toxic effects.

Recently, the scientific interest has focused on the study of pentacyclic triterpene derivatives, due to their immense therapeutic potential. Oleanolic acid (OA) (Fig. 1), a pentacyclic triterpenoid widely found in plants, whose cytotoxic effect has been tested in numerous tumor cell lines, such as lung cancer (3), breast cancer (4), colon cancer (5) and melanoma cell lines (6), is considered a promising anticancer drug. Insights have been gained with regard to the complexity of mechanisms underlying the antitumor effect of OA, as follows: i) induction of an increased expression of p53 tumor protein, cytochrome c, caspase-3 apoptosis-promoting protein and Bax; ii) triggering of mitochondrial mediated apoptosis; iii) inhibition of Akt, mTOR and S6K protein expression; iv) cell cycle arrest in different phases in a cancer type-dependent manner by altering the expression of regulatory cell cycle proteins (7–9); v) antioxidant activity by exerting scavenging effect against superoxide anion, hydroxyl radical, nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide and also by increasing the ferrous iron chelating activity (10); and vi) inhibition of angiogenesis in a dose- dependent manner (11).

Figure 1.

Chemical structure of oleanolic acid (possible derivatization sites highlighted in red).

Even though OA has proven potent antitumor activity, the in vivo application is limited due to its very low solubility in aqueous solutions, inconvenience that led to the development of novel semisynthetic derivatives with superior antitumor activity and increased solubility, as: 3-O-acetyl-OA derived carboxamides, and oleanolic acid-rhodamine B derivatives (12–15).

Rhodamines are xanthene-based derivatives widely used as fluorescent dyes for cellular and mitochondrial membrane potential measurement (16). Moreover, rhodamines were shown to penetrate the mitochondrial membrane and to accumulate in this organelle, exhibiting high tumor cell selectivity (17,18). Sommerwerk et al (12) found that the chemical modification of triterpenoic acid derivatives covalently bonded to rhodamine B, including oleanolic acid-rhodamine B derivatives (RhodOA), significantly improves their cytotoxic effect, becoming effective on tumor lines starting at nanomolar (nM) concentrations. Moreover, by staining and double-staining experiments it was reported that a diacetylated maslinic acid derivative, was able to enter the mitochondria, thus presenting a ‘MITOCAN’ behavior (i.e., agents that directly target and alter mitochondrial function of cancer cells causing cancer cell growth inhibition or apoptosis) (12).

A growing body of literature highlights the essential role that mitochondria play in cancer formation, progression, malignant transformation and even response to treatment (19,20). Due to their involvement in energy production, macromolecule biosynthesis, redox homeostasis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and the process of cell death mitochondria have emerged as promising targets for the anticancer agents (21,22).

Following the findings stated above, the purpose of the present study was to assess the in vitro and in ovo biological activity of RhodOA (Fig. 2) in different human tumor and healthy cell lines (A375 melanoma cell line, MDA-MB-231 breast adenocarcinoma, A549 lung adenocarcinoma, and HaCaT-healthy immortalized keratinocytes) in order to gain a deeper insight regarding their antiproliferative molecular mechanism.

Figure 2.

Chemical structure of 9-[2-[[4-(3b-Acetyloxy-olean-12-en-28-oyl)-1-piperazinyl] carbonyl] phenyl]-3,6-bis(diethylamino]-xanthylium chloride (RhodOA).

Materials and methods

Cell culture

A375 human melanoma, A549 human lung adenocarcinoma, and MDA-MB-231 human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC); HaCaT-human immortalized keratinocyte cell line was provided by the University of Debrecen, Hungary as a kind gift.

All the cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) high-glucose medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% penicillin/Strep, 10,000 IU/ml (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). The cells were incubated under standard temperature conditions of 37°C and humidity containing 5% CO₂.

MTT assay

To study cell viability, the colorimetric microculture tetrazolium assay (MTT) was used, as described by Andor et al (23) and Isaia et al (24). Cells were cultured in 96-well plates using a number of 1×10⁴ cells/well. After cell attachment, they were treated with five different concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 nM) of RhodOA solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and rhodamine B aqueous solution for 24, 48 and 72 h. The control cells were represented by the cells treated with DMSO, the solvent of OA derivative conjugated with rhodamine B and water, the solvent used for rhodamine B, respectively.

Following the treatment period, it was added 10 µl/well of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) solution (5 mg/ml) and after 3 h of incubation, the MTT precipitates formed were dissolved in 100 µl of solubilization buffer provided by the manufacturer. Finally, the reduced MTT was spectrophotometrically measured at 570 nm, using a microplate reader (xMark Microplate Spectrophotometer; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Immunofluorescence assay

The immunofluorescence assay was performed only on A375-human melanoma cells, as tumor cells, the selection was based on cell viability and cell respiration results; and also, on HaCaT-human keratinocytes as the healthy cells. Cells were cultured in 6-well plates on slides, 1×10⁶ cells/well and were stimulated with four different concentrations: 10, 20, 30 nM (the concentrations tested on cell respiration) and 100 nM (highest concentration tested in MTT assay).

The protocol applied for immunofluorescence staining, was based on a protocol described by Gheorgheosu et al (25) and adapted to our laboratory conditions. After 24 h of stimulation, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for one hour at room temperature. After fixation, cells were permeabilized using 2% Triton X-100 solution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min at room temperature. To block permeabilization, 30% FBS solution in 0.01% Triton X-100 was used for 1 h. Cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies Alexa Fluor^® 555 Phalloidin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) in a 1:20 dilution for visualization of actin fibers and Anti-COX IV antibody Mitochondrial marker (ab33985) in a dilution of 1:500. The following day, the primary antibodies were washed with 0.01% Triton X-100 solution in PBS. The secondary antibody specific for COX IV mitochondrial marker-Donkey anti-goat IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor^® 488-ab150129) was added for 2 h at room temperature in the dark. The 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining was used to visualize the nuclei. The images were captured using an Olympus IX73 inverted microscope provided with DP74 camera and analyzed with CellSens V1.15 software (Olympus Corporation) and Image J software.

Scratch assay

To determine the ability of RhodOA to inhibit the migration of human melanoma A375 cells, scratch assay was performed. The protocol applied was previously described in the literature (26). Briefly, 2×10⁵ A375 cells/well were cultured in 12-well plates until it reached 80–90% confluence. Using a sterile pipette tip, a line was drawn in the middle of the well through the single cell layer. The detached cells were removed by washing with PBS before stimulation. Then, the cells were stimulated with four different concentrations of the derivative (20, 40, 60 and 80 nM) and with the solvent used for the preparation of the derivative solutions (DMSO). The cells were immortalized at the time interval of 0 h and 24 h and were compared with the unstimulated control cells. Images were taken using the Olympus IX73 inverted microscope provided with DP74 camera (Olympus Corporation), and cell migration analysis was performed using cell Sense Dimension software. In order to calculate the percentage of migration, the formula previously described by Felice et al (27) was applied:

$$\text{Scratch closure rate}\hspace{0.17em}=[(A_{t0}-A_t/A_{t0})]\hspace{0.17em}\mathrm{x}\hspace{0.17em}100$$ (1)

where, A_t0, scratch area at time 0; A_t, scratch area at 24 h.

High resolution respirometry

Cellular respiratory function was determined by the means of high resolution respirometry studies (Oxygraph-2k Oroboros Ltd.) at 37°C. To obtain a comprehensive analysis of respiratory control, a substrate-uncoupler-inhibitor titration (SUIT) protocol was followed, designed to allow the measurements of respiratory rates with both separate and convergent Complex I and II (CI+CII) electron input, as described by Petruș et al (28). The cells (1×10⁶/ml) were suspended in a mitochondrial respiration medium (MIRO5: MgCl₂ 3 mM, EGTA 0.5 mM, taurine 20 mM, KH₂PO₄ 10 mM, K-lactobionate 60 mM, D-sucrose 110 mM, HEPES 20 mM, BSA 1 g/l, pH 7.1).

In order to allow the passage of soluble molecules between external media and cytosol and to analyze the extended functional oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), plasma membrane was permeabilized by adding a mild detergent: digitonin (35 µg/lx10⁶ cells). The optimum digitonin concentration for selective and complete plasma membrane permeabilization was determined directly in a respirometric protocol, as described by Pesta and Gnaiger (29).

Routine respiratory rates were measured in the presence of cells suspended in mitochondrial respiration media for 10–15 min. The SUIT protocol comprises several steps, as follows: i) addition of digitonin (cells permeabilizer) and the CI substrates (glutamate-G, 10 mM and malate-M, 5 mM) for State2 (basal respiratory rate) CI assessment; ii) addition of ADP (5 mM) for CI-dependent active respiration (OXPHOS CI) measurement; iii) addition of CII substrate succinate (S, 10 mM) allowed the convergent electron flow from both CI and CII and the measurement of maximal OXPHOS capacity (OXPHOS CI+CII); iv) addition of oligomycin (1 µg/ml) (inhibitor of ATP synthesis) resulted in a non-phosphorylative state and return to basal respiration (State4 CI+CII); v) addition of a decoupling agent, p- (trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone carbonyl cyanide (FCCP) determined the maximum respiratory capacity of the electron transport system (ETS CI+CII); vi) addition of the CI inhibitor rotenone (0.5 µM) was used to measure the ETS capacity, dependent on CII alone (ETS CII); and vii) antimycin A (1 µg/ml), a CIII inhibitor, was added to allow residual oxygen consumption (ROX) to be measured. All respiratory rates were corrected for ROX. After data acquisition, the corresponding flux control ratios (FCRs) that express respiratory control independent of cell size and content in mitochondria was calculated, as follows: i) P/E ratio (OXPHOS CI+CII/ETS CI+CII) describes the function of the phosphorylation system; ii) L/E (LEAK/ETS CI+CII) an indicator of mitochondrial coupling; iii) R/E (Routine/ETS CI+CII) shows how close the routine respiration is operating to the maximum ETS capacity, thus reflecting the degree of mitochondrial dysfunction; and iv) RCR (OXPHOS CI+CII/STATE2 CI)-indicates the OXPHOS coupling efficiency. The oxygen consumption rates (respiratory rates) were obtained using the software support DatLab 4 (Oroboros Instruments) and statistically analyzed using the GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Antioxidant activity

The antioxidant capacity of RhodOA and Rhod was measured by their ability to scavenge free radicals using a 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) ethanolic solution 0.1 mM. DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and distilled water (Chemical Company SA Iasi) were used as solvents for the dilution of the first (RhodOA) and second (Rhod), respectively. An ethanolic solution (ethanol 80% (v/v); Chemical Company SA Iasi) of ascorbic acid (Lach-Ner Company) 2 mM, was used as standard.

Experiments were carried out using the slightly modified method of Manzocco et al (30). Briefly, 2.5 ml of each sample was mixed with 0.5 ml of DPPH 0.1 mM. The absorbance of each sample was recorded continuously at 517 nm for 10 min, using a T70 UV/VIS spectrophotometer (PG Instruments). The antioxidant activity was calculated using the following formula:

$$\%\text{AOA}=(A_{\mathit{\text{initial}}}-A_{\mathit{\text{final}}})/A_{\mathit{\text{initial}}}\hspace{0.17em}\mathrm{x}\hspace{0.17em}100$$ (2)

where, A_initial, the absorbance of the DPPH 0.1 mM free radical, without the sample; A_final, the absorbance of each sample in mixture with the DPPH 0.1 mM free radical.

The antioxidant activity of each sample was compared to the antioxidant activity of the standard solution (ascorbic acid ethanolic solution 2 mM). The graphic data was interpreted using Origin 8 Lab software.

The IC₅₀^DPPH, defined as the concentration of antioxidant compounds from each sample that causes 50% loss of the DPPH activity was also determined, by using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay

Fertilized eggs (Gallus gallus domesticus) obtained from a local farm were disinfected with alcohol 70°, dated and incubated in a horizontal position under constant humidity conditions and a temperature of 37°C. On the 3rd day of incubation, 7 ml of albumen was extracted to allow the CAM to detach from the eggshell so that the blood vessels could be easily observed. On the fourth day of incubation, a window was cut and covered with adhesive tape, and the eggs were incubated until the day of the experiment.

The study was conducted starting with the 7th day of incubation. The effect of the RhodOA on angiogenesis was recorded for 5 days. During this time, the blood vessels have an increased rate of development similar to the tumor angiogenesis process (31). Five concentrations of RhodOA (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 nM) and the 0.5% DMSO solvent were tested in triplicates. A volume of 10 µl was applied inside a 5 mm diameter ring placed previously on the CAM surface. The microscopic evaluation was done daily by means of a Discovery 8 Stereomicroscope (Zeiss), while images were captured for analysis using Axio CAM 105 color (Zeiss) and Image J software.

Hen egg test-CAM (HET-CAM) assay

To evaluate the biocompatibility and toxicity of RhodOA, the Hen egg test (HET-CAM) was assessed. The eggs were prepared as described above in the CAM method. Five eggs were used for each test solution. For each solution, a volume of 500 µl was tested. The changes observed in CAM were evaluated using a stereomicroscope (Discovery 8 Stereomicroscope; Zeiss) and the images were performed (Axio CAM 105 color; Zeiss) before and after a 5 min application. All images were processed using ImageJ v 1.50e software (U.S. National Institutes of Health).

Water was used as negative control, and 1% sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) in H₂O was used as positive control. The test samples were diluted in DMSO at a concentration of 80 and 100 nM.

The effects on blood vessels, hemorrhage (H), vessel lysis (L) and coagulation and extra vascular (C) were monitored for 5 min. The analytical method used to determine the irritant effect was to calculate the irritation score (IS) using the formula (32):

$$IS=5\times \frac{301-H}{300}+7\times \frac{301-L}{300}+9\times \frac{301-C}{300}$$ (3)

where, IS was between 0 and 21.

Determination of anti-irritative potential

The eggs were prepared as indicated above. The method was adapted to our laboratory conditions (33). To determine the anti-irritant effect of RhodOA, the two previously tested concentrations (80 and 100 nM) were applied to the CAM in a volume of 600 µl. The eggs were introduced into the incubator for 3 h to allow the solution to be absorbed into the membrane. After 3 h, the eggs were treated with 300 µl 0.5% SDS in H₂O. The membrane was observed for 5 min and the vascular effects of lysis, stasis and hemorrhage were monitored.

Results

RhodOA induces a dose-dependent decrease of tumor cell viability

In order to determine the impact of the tested compound on cells viability, five different concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 nM) were tested in lung cancer (A549), breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) and human melanoma (A375) cell lines as compared to a healthy human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT). Cell viability was determined by MTT assay at 3 time intervals: 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively. At 24 and 48 h no significant effect was observed in the tumor cell lines; however, at 72 h a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability was noted in all the tumor lines, the most affected being the human melanoma cell line A375 (Fig. 3). In contrast, the HaCaT cells viability was slightly decreased at 20 nM concentration (up to 92%), while the highest concentration of the derivative, 100 nM, decreased viability to 83%. In parallel, 5 different concentrations of rhodamine B (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 nM) were tested; a slight dose-dependent decrease of cell viability was recorded but compared to the RhodOA derivative the decrease was not statistically significant.

Figure 3.

In vitro viability assessment of RhodOA and rhodamine B (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 nM) after 72 h in HaCaT human keratinocytes, A375 human melanoma, A549 human lung adenocarcinoma and MDA-MB-231 human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines. The results are expressed as cell viability percentage (%) normalized to control (DMSO-stimulated) cells. The data represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. One-way ANOVA analysis was applied to determine the statistical differences in rapport with DMSO followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons post-test (*P<0.05, **P<0.005, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001). DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.

RhodOA induces reorganization of A375 cytoskeleton and nuclei condensation

Changes in the nucleus, actin fibers and mitochondria morphological aspects were assessed by fluorescence microscopy in human melanoma A375 cells and human keratinocytes HaCaT.

An immunofluorescence assay was performed to determine the RhodOA mechanism of action responsible for cytotoxicity in human melanoma cells. By DAPI staining assay, it was observed that RhodOA induced a condensation of the nuclei in the case of the A375 cells, the most visible effect being recorded at a concentration of 100 nM (Fig. 4). In the case of the human keratinocytes (Fig. 5), the condensation of the nuclei was not so visible. Therefore, it can be concluded that RhodOA has a selective proapoptotic effect on the human melanoma cells.

Figure 4.

Effect of RhodOA (10, 20, 30 and 100 nM) and DMSO (0.5 mM) after 24 h of stimulation on the A375 cells on nuclei. DAPI staining (blue), F-actin fibers-Phalloidin (red) and COX IV mitochondrial marker (green). DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.

Figure 5.

Effect of RhodOA (10, 20, 30 and 100 nM) and DMSO (0.5 mM) after 24 h of stimulation on the HaCaT cells on nuclei. DAPI staining (blue), F-actin fibers-Phalloidin (red) and COX IV mitochondrial marker (green). DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.

The morphology and organization of actin fibers were evaluated in human melanoma cells and human keratinocytes after their treatment with different concentrations of RhodOA. In the case of human melanoma cells (Fig. 4), in the control cells, a network of branched actin fibers that runs along the cells was observed. Following treatment with RhodOA, a condensation of actin fibers was noticed, the strongest effect being recorded at a concentration of 100 nM. For human keratinocytes (Fig. 5) no significant changes in the structure and organization of actin fibers were noted.

By using the Anti-COX IV antibody Mitochondrial marker, we were able to gather information on the localization of mitochondria in A375 and HaCaT cells (Fig. 4) with and without RhodOA pretreatment. In A375 cells an increase in mitochondria concentration near the nucleus upon treatment with increasing concentrations of RhodOA was noted. In the HaCaT cells no modifications in terms of mitochondria distribution were detected (Fig. 5).

RhodOA inhibits A375 cell migration in a dose-dependent manner

In order to determine the effect of the OA derivative on cellular migration, the scratch assay was performed. Human melanoma cells were stimulated with four different concentrations of the derivative (20, 40, 60 and 80 nM), and were compared to unstimulated control cells and solvent (DMSO)-stimulated cells.

Stimulation of the A375 cells with RhodOA produced a dose-dependent anti-migratory effect (Fig. 6). At the lowest concentration of 20 nM, a closure of 35.6% was recorded, similar to that of the control group. At the concentration of 40 and 60 nM, the closure rate was 22.97 and 16.10%, respectively. At the highest tested concentration (80 nM), the derivative strongly inhibited cell migration, presenting the lowest closure rate (10.76%). In addition, after 24 h of stimulation, a slight modification in cell morphology was noted and some cells detached from the plate, which suggests that RhodOA has a cytotoxic effect against the melanoma cells (Fig. 7).

Figure 6.

Scratch closure rate of A375 following RhodOA treatment (20, 40, 60 and 80 nM). The graph shows the percentage of scratch closure after 24 h compared to the initial surface. The comparison between-groups was performed using One-way ANOVA test followed by Dunnett's post-test (*P<0.05; ***P<0.001 vs. control cells).

Figure 7.

Representative images of the A375 scratch assay. Images were captured at 0 and 24 h after stimulation with RhodOA versus control cells.

High-resolution respirometry studies

To study the effect on cellular respiration, three increasing concentrations of RhodOA (10, 20 and 30 nM) were tested in HaCaT and A375 cells.

The compound produced a dose-dependent increase in all respiratory rates in the HaCaT cells, whereas, in the case of A375 cells, a dose-dependent decrease of all respiratory rates, P/E and RCR and an increase of FCRs: L/E and R/E were recorded. The decrease of respiratory rates: State2 CI and State4 CI+CII suggests that the tested compound decreases oxygen consumption when the phosphorylation system is in an inactive state due to a decrease in proton leak/slip across the inner mitochondrial membrane. In addition, our results show that RhodOA inhibits active respiration and decreases the maximal respiratory capacity of the electron transfer system, by lowering the respiratory rates of OXPHOS CI and OXPHOS CI+CII simultaneously with the decrease of ETS CI+CII and ETS CII. As displayed in Fig. 8, in A375 cells, the routine respiration (i.e., when cell respiration is controlled by the physiological aerobic ATP demand) is decreased in a dose-dependent manner when RhodOA was applied (Table I).

Figure 8.

Effect of acute treatment with RhodOA (10, 20 and 30 nM) on cellular respiration in HaCaT human keratinocytes and A375 human melanoma cell lines. Data are presented as mean values ± SD results from three independent experiments. The comparison between the groups was performed using the one-way ANOVA test, followed the by Dunnett's post-test. *P<0.05, **P<0.005, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.

Table I.

Effect of acute treatment with RhodOA (10, 20 and 30 nM) on P/E, L/E, R/E and RCR in HaCaT-human keratinocytes and A375-human melanoma cell lines.

	P/E		L/E		R/E		RCR
	HaCaT	A375	HaCaT	A375	HaCaT	A375	HaCaT	A375
Control	0.787418	0.521129	0.133967	0.141969	0.463907	0.729738	6.213332	5.058102
RhodOA 10 nM	0.722780	0.683028	0.125734	0.164756	0.428187	0.841086	8.509565a	6.490921
RhodOA 20 nM	1.010007	0.642803	0.131158	0.138359	0.466503	1.003413	4.770558a	4.87191
RhodOA 30 nM	0.751809	0.637909	0.126915	0.217103	0.377931	1.218005a	6.422751	6.102949

Data are presented as mean values ± SD results from three independent experiments. Comparison between the groups was performed using the one-way ANOVA test, followed the by Dunnett's post-test

^aP<0.05).

Antioxidant activity

The antioxidant activity (AOA) was assessed by means of the DPPH method. Two sets of samples [RhodOA and rhodamine B (Rhod)] of different concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 nM) were tested.

As presented in Fig. 9, when the 0.1 mM ethanolic DPPH solution was used, both RhodOA and Rhod showed antioxidant activity compared to ascorbic acid. More precisely, the antioxidant activity of RhodOA and Rhod samples was above 80%, being slightly increased at the beginning of the reaction and gently decreasing towards the end of the reaction. This pattern was similar for almost all samples, except RhodOA 20 nM and RhodOA 60 nM, in which antioxidant activity was slightly higher at the end of the reaction compared to the initial moment. The maximum antioxidant activity was reached in the case of RhodOA 100 and 60 nM (85.03%) and Rhod 100 nM (84.71%) samples; the antioxidant activity of ascorbic acid was 94.19%.

Figure 9.

Antioxidant activity of RhodOA and Rhod at different concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 nM) vs. standard-ascorbic acid ethanolic solution (2 mM), using 0.1 mM ethanolic DPPH solution, in time.

The RhodOA and Rhod samples quenche the DPPH free radical after the first 50 sec, subsequently the reaction reaches equilibrium, except RhodOA 40 nM, Rhod 20 and 40 nM, in which antioxidant activity decreases visibly.

As shown in Fig. 9, the antioxidant activity of the analyzed samples is not concentration-dependent, at the initial moment nor after 10 min of reaction with DPPH free radical, its values oscillating over time (Table II).

Table II.

The inhibition percentage of ascorbic acid 2 mM, RhodOA and Rhod (20, 40, 60 and 80 nM), when reacting with 0.1 mM DPPH, after 10 min.

Ascorbic acid in ethanol 80%		RhodOA solution in DMSO		Rhod solution in distilled water
Concentration (mM)	% inhibition	Concentration (nM)	% inhibition	Concentration (nM)	% inhibition
2	94.16±0.0589	20	83.08±0.0089	20	83.70±0.0086
1	91.60±0.0075	40	82.27±0.0093	40	83.70±0.0086
0.6	49.51±0.0451	60	83.34±0.0623	60	84.68±0.0571
0.3	31.72±0.0610	80	84.61±0.0081	80	83.60±0.0086
0.1	9.20±0.0811	100	84.31±0.0083	100	84.71±0.0080

The results are expressed as average ± SD (n=3).

The IC₅₀^DPPH values for ascorbic acid 2 mM (IC₅₀=63.65 nM), RhodOA (IC₅₀=60.44 nM) and Rhod (IC₅₀=52.82 nM) were also calculated when reacting with 0.1 mM DPPH ethanolic solution, using equation (2) described above.

RhodOA has no toxic effect in ovo

The toxic potential of the RhodOA was tested in ovo using chicken CAM as the biological medium; the protocol allowed the assessment of its potential irritant effect following topical application. The effect induced by the compound along with the effects induced by positive (SDS) and negative controls (water), respectively, were recorded as photographs before and after 5 min of contact with the CAM. Hemorrhage, coagulation and lysis of blood vessels were detected only in SDS treated CAMs.

The highest IS was present only in the SDS-treated CAM, whereas the negative control and the test compound caused no irritant effect. The application of 500 µl SDS induces massive damage to blood vessels, causing micro-hemorrhage, coagulation and vascular lysis occurring on an extended membrane area. The death of specimens treated with SDS was noted after 60 min. For non-irritative samples, a viability of over 24 h was recorded.

Both tested concentrations of RhodOA, 80 and 100 nM were non-irritative to the vascular plexus of the CAM (Fig. 10; Table III).

Figure 10.

Analysis of the irritant potential of RhodOA by the HET-CAM method. Stereomicroscopic images of CAMs inoculated with negative control. H₂O, positive control, SLS, solvent used to solubilize RhodOA-DMSO 0.05% and test compound, RhodOA 80 and 100 nM. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; CAM, chorioallantoic membrane.

Table III.

IS for SDS, DMSO and RhodOA 80 and 100 nM and the occurrence time of hemorrhage (tH), lysis (tL) and coagulation (tC).

	SDS 1%	DMSO 0.5%	RhodOA 80 nM	RhodOA 100 nM
IS	19.17	1.15	1.87	2.07
tH	18 sec	300	300	180
tL	23 sec	300	300	300
tC	35 sec	264	240	300

IS, Irritation score; SDS, sodium dodecylsulfate; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.

RhodOA exhibits a moderate anti-irritant potential

In order to determine the potential anti-irritant effect of the tested compound, we proceeded with a preventive application of the test solutions and DMSO as control, prior to the SDS irritative intervention. The same parameters as for the HET-CAM assay were registered (H, L and S time in seconds), both with and without pre-treatment of test samples. Thus, the following parameters for the anti-irritant effect were calculated: H_AI = H/H_SDS: hemorrhage time after pretreatment with RhodOA and SDS addition 0.5%/hemorrhage time without pretreatment with RhodOA; L_AI = L/L_SDS: vascular lysis time after pretreatment with RhodOA and SDS addition 0.5%/vascular lysis time without pretreatment with RhodOA; C_AI = C/C_SDS: vascular coagulation time after pretreatment with RhodOA and SDS addition 0.5%/vascular coagulation time without pretreatment with RhodOA.

Table IV presents the irritability score (IS) after treatment with RhodOA 80 nM (IS_RhodOA80) and 100 nM (IS_RhodOA100), H, L and C onset times before treatment; H_RhodOA, L_RhodOA and C_RhodOA after pretreatment and administration of 0.5% SDS and H_AI, L_AI and C_AI parameters.

Table IV.

Anti-irritant effect of RhodOA 80 and 100 nM and solvent DMSO 0.5% after CAM irritation with SDS 0.5%.

	SDS 0.5%	DMSO 0.5% + SDS	RhodOA 80nM + SDS	RhodOA 100 nM + SDS
IS	18.68	18.43	17.03	17
tH	55 sec	24 sec	90 sec	90 sec
tL	44 sec	90 sec	70 sec	80 sec
tC	14 sec	4 sec	30 sec	23 sec
HAI		0.43	1.63	1.63
LAI		2.04	1.59	1.81
CAI		0.28	2.14	1.64

DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; SDS, sodium dodecylsulfate; CAM, chorioallantoic membrane.

The lack of anti-irritative effect can clearly be seen for DMSO, while RhodOA induces a reduction of the IS value of SDS with no pre-treatment. Both concentrations of RhodOA induce a similar moderate anti-irritative effect (Fig. 11).

Figure 11.

Stereomicroscopic images of CAM after irritation with SDS and treatment with RhodOA 80 and 100 nM and DMSO 0.5%. CAM, chorioallantoic membrane; SDS, sodium dodecylsulfate; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.

RhodOA presents a dose-dependent anti-angiogenic effect

The anti-angiogenic effect of the OA-rhodamine B derivative was tested in vivo using the CAM assay. Chicken embryo specimens showed good viability and survival rate, allowing compound testing up to approximately ED11. After 3 days of treatment, a change in the vascular network was observed. Fig. 12 shows a decrease in vascular density, with numerous areas with a low number of capillaries inside the ring. This decrease in the number of newly formed vessels is directly proportional to the concentration tested, significant results were obtained in the case of the highest tested concentration (100 nM).

Figure 12.

Effect of RhodOA (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 nM) and 0.05% DMSO on CAM assay on normal angiogenesis after 3 days of treatment. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; CAM, chorioallantoic membrane.

Discussion

Old strategies, which aimed to treat cancer just by the induction of cell death, are no longer relevant. New therapeutic approaches that also target the tumor microenvironment treatment, immune/inflammatory response modulation, stopping angiogenesis and resistance of cancer cell death by using highly selective compounds with a specific action and with reduced systemic toxic effects, represent the focus of the current trends in cancer research. Therefore, an increasing number of preclinical and epidemiological studies support the beneficial effect of phytochemicals in cancer (34,35). Due to their selectivity against cancer cells and the plethora of biological activities (anticancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic, antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral and antifungal), the use of triterpenes have emerged as a multifaceted potential alternative in cancer prevention and treatment (36). Among triterpenes, the antiproliferative effect of OA has been described in various types of cancer, such as: breast cancer (4), lung cancer (3), liver cancer (37), skin cancer (38,39), gastric cancer (40), pancreatic cancer (41), prostate cancer (42) and in leukemia (43).

In order to increase its therapeutic potential in cancer treatment, numerous derivatizations of OA have been performed. A study by Wiemann et al (44) evaluated the cytotoxic potential of hydroxiaminated derivatives of OA and revealed that the obtained derivatives exhibit higher cytotoxic effect on certain tumor cell lines (breast cancer, MCF-7, lung cancer, A549) and a lower cytotoxic activity against healthy cell lines (nonmalignant mouse fibroblasts, NIH 3T3). Another study demonstrated that by introducing a double bond at C ring, a derivative with superior antitumor effect is obtained by increasing ROS production, caspase-9 activity and inducing mitochondrial mediated apoptosis in MCF-7, breast cancer cell line (14). Heller et al (15) showed that 3-O-acetyl-OA derived carboxamides also have a superior antitumor effect compared to OA when applied on several human tumor cell lines, by inducing cell cycle arrest and cell death via autophagy or apoptosis. In line with the previous stated findings, Xie et al (45), reported the synthesis of a rhodamine-B-docetaxel conjugate, in order to obtain improved mitochondrial delivery and increased cytotoxicity; results showed the specific delivery of the compound to mitochondria and improved antitumor effect.

Similarly, pentacyclic triterpenoic acid rhodamine B esters or piperazine-spacered rhodamine B amides were shown to be more cytotoxic on various cancer cell lines compared with their parent compound (12,46). The present work aimed to further investigate oleanolic acid-rhodamine B (RhodOA) mechanism of action by a series of in vitro and in ovo biological studies. Thus, the effect of RhodOA on cellular viability was first assessed in three tumor cell lines: lung cancer (A549), breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) and human melanoma (A375) cell lines and in a healthy human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT). We found that after 72 h exposure, RhodOA significantly decreased cell viability, in a dose-dependent manner, in all three different types of cancer cell lines (the most significant effect was observed in A375 cells, cell line selected for further investigations), whereas healthy human keratinocyte cells were not affected. Moreover, RhodOA induced a dose-dependent anti-migratory effect in A375 cell line (Fig. 6). As suggested by the obtained data, RhodOA presents selective antitumor activity as well as reduced toxicity on healthy cells.

One of the hallmarks of cancer is the immense ability of tumor cells to evade apoptosis. A large number of literature studies revealed that defects in the apoptotic pathways have an important role in carcinogenesis and thus, treatment strategies that target apoptosis can be successfully used in cancer therapy (47,48). The morphological changes associated with apoptosis include: formation of apoptotic bodies, nuclear condensation, DNA fragmentation, cell shrinkage and membrane alterations (49). Several recent studies indicated that OA can induce the above-mentioned morphological changes in HepG2-human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (50), in HeLa-human cervical cancer cell line (51) and in various human astrocytoma cell lines (52). Similar morphological changes of apoptosis were reported when OA derivatives were used against SMMC-7721 human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (53), K562 human leukemia cell line (54) and B16-F10 melanoma cell line, respectively (55). Moreover, another cytotoxic triterpenoid, piperazine, of rhodamine B derivatives were reported to accumulate in mitochondria and to trigger apoptosis in A2780 ovarian carcinoma cells (46). Our results are in line with all these findings, showing that RhodOA produced a condensation of the nuclei, a hallmark of apoptosis, with the highest effect being detected when the highest concentration was used (100 nM, Fig. 4), visible only in the case of A375 cells and not in the HaCaT cells; therefore, a high degree of selectivity can be assumed. However, a deeper analysis is required to evaluate all the morphological changes associated with apoptosis and to conclude on the pro-apoptotic effect of the new OA-rhodamine B derivative.

The tumor invasion and metastasizing capacity depends on the cancer cell ability to move, and hence by the actin content. Our findings regarding the evaluation of actin fiber organization, in A375 human melanoma cells, revealed that treatment with RhodOA causes significant changes in the F-actin pattern, increasing the condensation of F-actin, the strongest effect being observed at 100 nM, while untreated A375 human melanoma cells presented a normal morphology and actin spread (Fig. 4). For HaCaT human keratinocytes, no significant changes in the structure and organization of actin fibers were observed (Fig. 5). These results suggest that the RhodOA influences the cytoskeleton arrangement of human melanoma cells; similar results were obtained in astrocytoma cell lines treated with OA (52).

As reviewed by Kim et al (56), due to the essential role that mitochondria play in energy metabolism, signaling pathways and cell death, they are implicitly involved in tumor initiation, growth, metastasis and even in drug resistance. Numerous studies have tried to identify the antitumor mechanisms of action of OA. Zhu et al (50) found that OA induces apoptosis in liver cancer cells by affecting mitochondria in a dose-dependent manner (50). Another study reported that OA induced apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HuH7) cell lines through mitochondria-mediated pathway (57). Similarly, when tested on A549 lung cancer cells, OA produces ultrastructural alterations of the mitochondria, increases ROS production and causes mitochondria autophagy, a process known as mitophagy (58).

In the present study, we evaluated the effects of a new RhodOA conjugate on mitochondrial respiration in healthy human keratinocytes (HaCaT) and on human melanoma tumor cells (A375). When applied to the A375 cells, RhodOA decreased routine respiration in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 8). Mitochondrial respiration and phosphorylation in the routine state are controlled by energy demand and turnover and the degree of mitochondrial coupling (29). The results also revealed a dose-dependent inhibition of the active respiration (OXPHOS) in the A375 cells as well as an increase of the active respiration in HaCaT cells (Fig. 8). However, mitochondrial uncoupling/toxicological dyscoupling can contribute to flux control in the OXPHOS state. In order to see if the decrease of OXPHOS observed in the A375 cells treated with RhodOA is a result of RhodOA acting as a mitochondrial uncoupler (i.e., by increasing the proton leak across the inner mitochondrial membrane, thus uncoupling the link between ADP phosphorylation in ATP and substrate oxidation) the values of State4 CI+CII were analyzed (Fig. 8). As presented by Terada (59) uncoupling agents increase State4 respiratory rate. Interestingly, our results showed a decrease of the State4 CI+CII respiratory rate, suggesting that RhodOA decreases proton leak/slip across the inner mitochondrial membrane and does not act as mitochondrial uncoupler. Hence, we can assume that the detected decrease of OXPHOS is a direct consequence of low ADP phosphorylation in ATP. Taken together these results suggests that treatment with RhodOA impaired mitochondrial function and the capacity to produce sufficient levels of ATP in A375 melanoma cells without inducing toxicity in the healthy human keratinocyte cells HaCaT. As previously demonstrated, ATP loss in cancer cells leads to energy depletion, cellular stress, and ultimately may induce cell death through different pathways (60,61). Contrary to the traditional belief that cancer cells present mitochondrial damage and consecutive metabolic inability, current studies have demonstrated that mitochondrial respiration is not impaired in many cancers (62). By calculating FCRs (Table I), we obtained valuable information regarding mitochondrial integrity, efficiency and more importantly, how the tested compound influenced mitochondrial functions. In A375 cells treated with RhodOA the results revealed a decrease of RCR and P/E parallel with an increase of L/E and R/E vs. control, thus suggesting that RhodOA decreases the capacity of the phosphorylation system. In addition, the L/E and R/E increase observed in the A375 cell tests (Table I) suggests an increased cellular ATP demand or the existence of a limitation in the mitochondrial respiratory capacity produced by defects in substrate oxidation or in ETS complexes after treatment with RhodOA (29). By correlating the high antitumor effect with the relevant intervention on mitochondrial respiration, we can presume that the new OA-rhodamine B derivative exhibits a ‘MITOCAN’ behavior.

As presented in a recent review by Yang et al (63), ROS role in cancer is like a double-edged sword, being a tumor-suppressing or a tumor-promoting agent, with vast evidence that supports both cases. However, this dichotomy of ROS in cancer cells depends on the stage of cancer progression; in early stages moderate ROS induce tumor growth and metastasis, whilst in late stages, with tumor progression, increasing ROS levels can lead to apoptosis, cell death and senescence (64). In the case of human melanoma cells, studies concluded that ROS play an important role in increasing the metastasis potential, by inducing DNA mutations and cell proliferation and by activating molecules involved in metastasis, such as: urokinase plasminogen receptor activator, interleukin-8, epidermal growth factor receptor, and vascular endothelial growth factor (65). In lung cancer, increasing ROS produce changes at the DNA level and in the structure of lipids, carbohydrates and proteins, thus leading to proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells (66). A study performed on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines concluded that ROS stimulate angiogenesis and favor the metastasis process (67). In terms of the effect phytochemicals exhibit in cancer, a study revealed that OA had an anti-proliferative effect while increasing the oxidative stress in various breast cancer cell lines, thus being a pro-oxidant agent (68). Controversially, on HCT 116 colon cancer cell line, OA exhibited anti-proliferative and antioxidant activity (69). The free radical scavenging activity of OA, analyzed through the same DPPH method used in the current work, showed that OA has a significant free radical inhibitory activity compared to the standard antioxidant ascorbic acid (IC₅₀=61.5 µg/ml; 132 µM) (69). This is in line with our findings, according to which RhodOA maintains the free radical scavenging activity exhibited by OA; moreover, RhodOA has a stronger antioxidant effect at 100 nM, comparable to that of the ascorbic acid control solution (RhodOA IC₅₀=60.44 nM).

Tumor development and progression represents a cumulative molecular and phenotypic modification of epithelial cells (70). Angiogenesis is one of the processes that underlies tumor development and progression. New blood vessel development is stimulated when tumor cells require increasing amounts of nutrients and oxygen due to a high and rapid proliferation rate (71,72). Therefore, inhibition of angiogenesis can result in tumor growth inhibition. Regarding the effect of OA on angiogenesis, an important effect in inhibiting the formation of blood vessels has been observed in the case of Sk-Mel-2 melanoma cells (73). The anti-angiogenic effect of OA has been previously tested using the CAM method and it was proven to have the potential to reduce vascular density and reduce capillary count in a concentration of 30 µM (73).

In this study, the effects of a novel OA-rhodamine B derivative were evaluated on angiogenesis and a decrease was detected in the vascular density and a lower number of capillaries after 3 days of treatment (Fig. 12). The best recorded results in terms of the number of newly formed vessels were recorded for the highest tested concentration (100 nM), a lower dose compared to that previously used for the parent compound (74). The literature contains data regarding optimized anti-angiogenic effect of certain OA derivatives; CDDO-Me (methyl 2-cyano-3,12-dioxoolean-1,9-dien-28-oate) and CDDO-Imm (2-cyano-3,12-dioxoolean-1,9-dien-28-oic imidazolide), exhibited increased anti-angiogenic effect, by preventing endothelial cell tubulogenesis, at low doses in the Matrigel sponge assay, being also able to inhibit tumor growth in an immortalized Kaposi's sarcoma cell line (74).

In conclusion, this study brings valuable evidence that an oleanolic acid-rhodamine B derivative, RhodOA, display antitumor properties against lung cancer, breast cancer and human melanoma cell lines without inducing toxic effects on human healthy keratinocytes. Moreover, when tested in human melanoma cells, RhodOA was able to produce a condensation of the nuclei and of F-actin. Despite the limitations of this study, the above-mentioned results suggest that RhodOA is involved in the apoptotic process of cancer cells as well as in suppressing tumor invasion and metastasis. A significant improvement of the anti-angiogenic potential compared to the parent compound OA was observed for the novel rhodamine B derivative. Furthermore, the novel formulation RhodOA showed an increased free radical scavenging activity compared to OA alone. In melanoma cells, RhodOA impaired mitochondrial function and the capacity to produce sufficient levels of ATP, whilst the mitochondrial function of healthy human keratinocytes was left intact. The observed antitumor effect can be correlated with the intervention that RhodOA has on mitochondrial respiration, therefore the new OA-rhodamine B derivative can be classified as a ‘MITOCAN’. Even though further studies are still needed to unravel its full mechanism of action, this study sheds light on the immense therapeutic anticancer potential of this novel OA derivative.

Funding

This study was supported by an internal grant at ‘Victor Babes’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy (grant no. 2DOC/1299/31.01.2020.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

VD, CD, CȘ: designed and directed the project; CD, AT: provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript; IM, AM, DC, VLD: contributed to the interpretation of the results; IM, ȘA, AM: carried out the experiments; IM, DAS, AM, CȘ, DC: wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All the authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

DAS is the Editor-in-Chief for the journal, but had no personal involvement in the reviewing process, or any influence in terms of adjudicating on the final decision, for this article. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.