In supporting information file S4 Table, some table row headers were omitted in the final version of the table, leading to incorrect numbers in the rows affected. For example in the last section ‘50c per litre’, the row heading ‘% expenditure food and non-alcoholic drinks’ is missing.
Please see the corrected S4 Table.
Supporting information
S4 Table. Cost-effectiveness results of the sensitivity analyses.
(PDF)
Click here for additional data file. (207.5KB, pdf)
Reference
- 1.Lal A, Mantilla-Herrera AM, Veerman L, Backholer K, Sacks G, Moodie M, et al. (2017) Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: A cost-effectiveness and equity analysis. PLoS Med 14(6): e1002326 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
S4 Table. Cost-effectiveness results of the sensitivity analyses.
(PDF)
Click here for additional data file. (207.5KB, pdf)