Abstract
Background:
Geosocial networking applications (GNA) are relatively new outlets through which individuals may find partners for sexual encounters. There has been a paucity of research on the associations between use of these platforms and measures of mental health and compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD).
Methods:
Using data from a large web-based sample (N=4,203), we examined demographics associated with the use of GNA. Using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for demographic differences between users and non-users, we examined associations between GNA use, anxiety, and CSBD.
Results:
12.3% of participants reported that they used GNA. Those who reported using the applications compared with those who did not were more likely to be young, male, and non-heterosexual. After adjusting for demographic variables, GNA use was associated with CSBD (aOR=1.62, 95% CI 1.09-2.37, p=.015) but not anxiety.
Conclusion:
Use of GNA was prevalent among our sample and associated with CSBD. GNA use may represent an important platform through which CSBD manifests. Conversely, GNA use may drive CSBD. Given the cross-sectional nature of this study, direction of causation cannot be determined, and further research is needed to better understand the interactions between GNA use and CSBD.
Keywords: Compulsive sexual behavior, geosocial networking applications, anxiety, gay, bisexual
INTRODUCTION
Geosocial networking applications (GNA) are digital social media platforms through which individuals can create a personal profile and connect with nearby users to form new relationships 1 These platforms utilize global positioning system technology to connect users based on geographic proximity to each other 1. Popular examples include Grindr, Tinder, Scruff, Her, and Jack’d, among others.
Most research on these platforms have focused on non-heterosexual cisgender men. Researchers have largely focused on Grindr, a popular GNA, with an estimated six million users in 192 countries, and the associations between Grindr use and sexual behaviors and sexually transmitted infections 1. Studies have shown that GNA use is associated with having unprotected anal intercourse 2 and the acquisition of sexually transmitted infections 3. For this reason, some have argued that GNA like Grindr may be attractive platforms through which to implement sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs 4.
While a body of researching regarding GNA and sexual health is emerging, there is limited data regarding the interactions between GNA and mental health. In a recent qualitative study of rural non-heterosexual men, participants noted that GNA can provide a sense of community that would otherwise be difficult to develop, as few users are openly non-heterosexual or “out,” and users feel more comfortable connecting with other non-heterosexual users online 5. However, participants also noted that GNA can have an isolating effect due to anonymity and limited relationship development that is often based on sexual relationships 5. In a study of 200,000 iPhone users, 77% of Grindr users reported feeling unhappy after using Grindr. 6.
There has been an even greater paucity of research regarding the use of GNA by heterosexual users; however, in one study of Tinder users, app use was associated with feelings of shame and body dissatisfaction 6.
Compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) was recently included in the ICD-11 and is defined as “a persistent pattern of failure to control intense, repetitive sexual impulses or urges resulting in repetitive sexual behavior” that impairs personal, family, social, educational, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. 7 In the past, we have theorized that some individuals with internalized psychopathology (i.e. anxiety or depression) may utilize digital sexual outlets as a way to alleviate negative affect, and that this behavior may become compulsive, leading to compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD), which has also been termed “hypersexuality” 9. We found in a convenience sample of U.S. Veterans that digital sex-seeking was associated with anxiety, depression, and CSBD. 9Though it is difficult to generalize these findings to the general population, we hypothesized that GNA may be associated with anxiety and CSBD in the civilian population as well.
An alternative explanation for how GNA use could lead to CSBD is through intermittent ratio reinforcement 8. Under this theoretical model, rewards for GNA use (i.e. orgasm and sexual satisfaction) come at unpredictable intervals (i.e. intermittent ratio reinforcement) 8. It has been well-documented that this reinforcement schedule makes reinforced behavior difficult to extinguish 8. Under this model, the behavior need not necessarily be driven by an attempt to alleviate negative affect, but rather by a drive toward reward.
Using a large non-targeted online sample, we examined the prevalence of GNA use as well as demographic variables associated with use. We then examined associations between GNA use, anxiety, and CSBD.
METHODS
Participants
Participants were recruited through TestMyBrain.org, an online platform where visitors can participate in research and receive immediate personalized feedback. TestMyBrain is a citizen science research platform where people can participate in research on the mind, brain, and mental health, in exchange for individualized feedback about their own scores in relation to others who have completed the same measures. People come to TestMyBrain from a variety of sources, primarily organic search engines queries (e.g. “learn about my brain” or “brain tests”) or links posted by previous participants on social media. Previous studies have shown that data from TestMyBrain participants is similar in quality to data collected in traditional settings 9 and that findings from TestMyBrain samples replicate findings from traditional research studies 10, 11, including nationally representative samples 12.
For the current study, participants received their generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) score and how this score compared with other TestMyBrain.org participants as immediate study feedback. To avoid confirmation bias, measures were embedded within a battery shown to participants under the name “Life Experiences and Face Attractiveness” which included a facial attractiveness judgment task and a choice reaction time task as well as the measures of interest. The present study was approved by the Harvard Commitee on the Use of Human Subject.
Measures
Geosocial Networking Application Use
Participants were asked if they used any of several commonly used GNA (Tinder, Grindr, HER, Coffee Meets Bagel, and Bumble). Participants endorsing use of any of these GNA were coded as “users” and those who did not endorse using one of these were coded as “non-users.” Note that this method could have resulted in those who use less popular GNA apps being coded as “non-users,” increasing the likelihood of a Type II error.
Generalized Anxiety
The GAD-7 is a screening instrument for generalized anxiety disorder and has been shown to have high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (82%) 13. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0 to 3), with scores ranging from 0 to 21. A score greater than or equal to 11 was used to define clinically significant anxiety 13.
Compulisve Sexual Behavior Disorder (CSBD)
The hypersexual behavior inventory (HBI) is a 19-item scale that measures clinical characteristics of CSBD (e.g.“T feel like my sexual behavior is taking me in a direction I don’t want to go.”). 14 Each scale item is scored on a five point Likert scale (1 to 5), with total scores ranging from 19 to 95. A score of 53 has been proposed as a clinical cutoff for CSBD. 14 For the current study, to increase retention, the Likert scale was converted to a True/False judgement where “True” responses were given a score of 1 and “False” responses were given a score of 0, giving a total score of 19 for the whole measure. To ensure reliability and validity of the modified HBI, we separately collected data to compare the Likert and True/False versions in N= 234 participants recruited from TestMyBrain.org. Each participant was randomized to receive half of the HBI items in Likert scale format and half in True/False format. Scores on the two forms were correlated at r = 0.87 [95% CI= 0.82-0.91] and r = 0.91 [95% CI = 0.88-0.94], with internal reliabilities (calculated using split-half method) of 0.87-0.89 for the True/False versions and 0.939-0.944 for the Likert scale versions, indicating that the modified HBI is both reliable and valid. For the modified HBI, we coded scores greater than or equal to 11 as CSBD, based on transformation of the original HBI cut-off of 53.
Statistical Analyses
Participants were classified as GNA users if they reported using any of the applications listed in the survey on GNA use, regardless of the frequency of use. For demographic variables, significance was tested with χ2 tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. To determine the relationship between GNA use and clinically significant anxiety and CSBD, we conducted logistic regressions, controlling for demographic variables that were significantly different between users and non-users. We also computed adjusted odds ratios based on these regression models. All data analysis was conducted in R.
RESULTS
12.3% of participants endorsed using GNA. App users were more likely to be male, younger, and non-heterosexual (Table 1). After adjusting for these covariates, GNA use was associated with CSBD (aOR=1.62, 95% CI 1.09-2.37, p=.015). No association was detected between GNA use and clinically significant anxiety. We additionally examined GAD-7 score as a continuous variable and again found no association between GNA use and anxiety.
Table 1.
Demographic variables comparing those who use geosocial networking applications “app users” and those who do not use geosocial networking applications “nonusers.”
Variable [range] | Nonusers n (%) |
M (SD) | App Users n (%) |
M (SD) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total participants | 3,688 | 515 | |||
Age [18-99] | 33.28 (15.01) | 26.11 (8.28) | <0.001 | ||
Gender | |||||
Male | 1,630 (44.2%) | 285 (55.3%) | |||
Female | 1,999 (54.2%) | 216 (41.9%) | |||
Non-binary/Genderqueer | 50 (0.4%) | 14 (2.7%) | <0.001 | ||
Sexual Orientation | |||||
Heterosexual | 2,376 (64.4%) | 307 (59.6%) | |||
Gay | 119 (3.2%) | 41 (8.0%) | |||
Bisexual | 421 (11.4%) | 81 (15.7%) | |||
Asexual | 64 (1.7%) | 3 (0.6%) | <0.001 | ||
Race | |||||
American Indian or Alaska Native | 135 (3.7%) | 15 (2.9%) | |||
Asian | 819 (22.2%) | 91 (17.7%) | |||
African/Black | 159 (4.3%) | 20 (3.9%) | |||
European/White | 1865 (50.6%) | 302 (58.6%) | |||
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 26 (0.7%) | 3 (0.6%) | 0.013 | ||
Education | |||||
None / Not Specified | 18 (0.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | |||
Primary School | 15 (0.4%) | 1 (0.2%) | |||
Middle School | 72 (2.0%) | 9 (1.8%) | |||
High School | 535 (14.5%) | 62 (12.0%) | |||
Some College | 775 (21.0%) | 129 (25.1%) | |||
Technical Training / Associate’s | 183 (5.0%) | 29 (5.6%) | |||
Degree | |||||
Bachelor’s Degree | 845 (22.9%) | 139 (27.0%) | |||
Gradaute School | 666 (18.1%) | 75 (14.6%) | 0.010 |
Note. Participants were asked to select all categories that applied when reporting their race. Thus, percentages do not add to 100. Bold indicated statistical significance. Categorical variables were compared using X2 tests and continuous variables were compared using t-tests.
DISCUSSION
We found that a sizable minority (12.3%) of our online sample engaged with GNA. GNA use was especially prevalent among gay and bisexual men (26.4%), and users were on average younger. The high rate among sexual minority individuals may be due to these individuals feeling safer exploring sex and romance online, rather than through in-person venues that may stigmatize non-heterosexual individuals 8. The younger age of GNA users compared with non-GNA users may represent relatively more comfort with technology among younger people. The higher rates of GNA use among males may be secondary to social pressures against women engaging in casual romantic or sexual relationships. More research is needed to better understand the reasons for these demographic differences.
In contrast with past studies that found associations between digital sex seeking and poor mental health, we found no association between GNA use and anxiety. We did, however, find a significant association between GNA and CSBD.
Given the cross-sectional nature of this study, it is impossible to determine the direction of causation between GNA and CSBD. One possibility is that GNA represents a platform through which CSBD manifests 15. Alternatively, GNA may drive CSBD. GNA platforms like Grindr can be understood as utilizing intermittent variable ratio reinforcement, providing validation and sexual excitement at unpredictable intervals. This model of reinforcement has been shown to have strong addictive potential, and is one proposed mechanism for the addictive nature of slot machines in gambling disorder 16.
Our second theory, that GNA use leads to CSBD as individuals attempt to self-sooth negative affect was not supported by our findings, as anxiety levels were not elevated among GNA users. Though we did not find associations between anxiety and GNA, it is plausible that other types of psychopathology that were not measured in the current study (e.g. depression) may lead individuals to engage with GNA, later leading to CSBD. 6 Future research should examine this possibility.
Strengths of this study include its large sample size and non-targeted recruitment design, which minimizes confirmation bias. Limitations of this study include its cross-sectional design, which limits interpretation in terms of direction of causation. The current study also lacked additional information regarding participants’ GNA use (frequency of use, goals of use, number of GNA used, whether participants have sex with partners met on GNA, etc.). Future research should collect more granular data on the ways in which participants engage with GNA. It is important to note that the HBI was developed prior to the addition of CSBD to the ICD-11 7, 14. Future research should use CSBD-specific scales. Future qualitative research will be helpful to better understand the motivations to use GNA as well as the mental health sequelae of use. Future research should also explore other measures of psychopathology, as the current study examined only anxiety. An additional limitation is our use of a crowdsourced sample, which allowed us to get a large sample size but introduces potential self-selection biases. Future studies with nationally representative samples might clarify prevalence of GNA use and give more accurate population level associations.
Overall, this study is an initial foray into understanding the relationships between GNA and mental health. Further research is needed to understand the relationships between GNA use, psychopathology, and CSBD.
Table 2.
Associations between geosocial networking application (GNA) use, clinically-relevant anxiety (GAD-7 >= 10) and compulsive sexual behavior disorder (HBI>=11), adjusted for age, gender, and sexual orientation).
Outcome | N | % in GNA users | % in GNA nonusers | AOR (95% CI) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBI >= 11 | 4,028 | 7.74 | 3.65 | 1.62 (1.09, 2.37) | 0.015 |
GAD-7 >= 10 | 3,509 | 45.37 | 43.89 | 0.87 (0.70, 1.08) | 0.21 |
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of Interest:
None
REFERENCES
- [1].Goedel WC, Duncan DT. Geosocial-networking app usage patterns of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: survey among users of Grindr, a mobile dating app. JMIR public health and surveillance. 2015;1: e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Holloway IW, Pulsipher CA, Gibbs J, Barman-Adhikari A, Rice E. Network influences on the sexual risk behaviors of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men using geosocial networking applications. AIDS and behavior. 2015;19: 112–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Owen S, Kurka T, Richardson D. UG2 Grindr© use by men who have sex with men (MSM) is associated with high rates of bacterial sexually transmitted infections. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Holloway IW, Dunlap S, Del Pino HE, Hermanstyne K, Pulsipher C, Landovitz RJ. Online Social Networking, Sexual Risk and Protective Behaviors: Considerations for Clinicians and Researchers. Current addiction reports. 2014;1: 220–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Hubach RD CJ, Giano Z, Meyers H, DeBoy K, Wheeler DL, Croff JM. Experiences of Stigma by Gay and Bisexual Men in Rural Oklahoma. Health Equity. 2019;3: ePublication ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Strubel J, Petrie TA. Love me Tinder: body image and psychosocial functioning among men and women. Body Image. 2017;21: 34–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Reed GM, First MB, Kogan CS, et al. Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2019;18: 3–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Turban J We need to talk about how Grindr is affecting gay men’s mental health. Vox; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Germine L, Nakayama K, Duchaine BC, Chabris CF, Chatterjee G, Wilmer JB. Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2012;19: 847–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Dodell-Feder D, Saxena A, Rutter L, Germine L. The network structure of schizotypal personality traits in a population-based sample. Schizophrenia research. 2019;208: 258–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Rutter LA, Dodell-Feder D, Vahia IV, et al. Emotion sensitivity across the lifespan: Mapping clinical risk periods to sensitivity to facial emotion intensity. Journal of experimental psychology: general. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Hartshorne JK, Germine LT. When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span. Psychological science. 2015;26: 433–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of internal medicine. 2006;166: 1092–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Reid RC, Garos S, Carpenter BN. Reliability, validity, and psychometric development of the Hypersexual Behavior Inventory in an outpatient sample of men. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity. 2011;18: 30–51. [Google Scholar]
- [15].Kraus SW, Krueger RB, Briken P, et al. Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder in the ICD-11. World Psychiatry. 2018;17: 109–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Murch WS, Clark L. Games in the brain: neural substrates of gambling addiction. The Neuroscientist. 2016;22: 534–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]