Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Genetics logoLink to Frontiers in Genetics
. 2020 Jul 23;11:773. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00773

Development and Application of SSR Markers Related to Genes Involved in Leaf Adaxial-Abaxial Polarity Establishment in Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis)

Ying Gao 1,2,†, Yin Lu 1,†, Xiaoguang Li 3, Na Li 1, Xiaomeng Zhang 1, Xiangjie Su 1, Daling Feng 1, Mengyang Liu 1, Shuxin Xuan 1, Aixia Gu 1, Yanhua Wang 1, Xueping Chen 1, Jianjun Zhao 1,*, Shuxing Shen 1,*
PMCID: PMC7391075  PMID: 32793286

Abstract

In Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis), leaf adaxial-abaxial (ad-ab) polarity is tightly related to leaf incurvature, an essential factor for the formation of leafy heads. Therefore, identification of the genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity and studying their genetic variation may clarify the mechanism of leafy head formation. By comparing the sequences of the genes regulating leaf ad-ab polarity development in Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana), 41 candidate genes distributed on 10 chromosomes were found to be responsible for the establishment of ad-ab polarity in Chinese cabbage. Orthologous genes, including 10 single copies, 14 double copies, and one triple copies, were detected in the Chinese cabbage. The gene structure and conserved domain analyses showed that the number of exons of the 41 candidate genes range from one to 25, and that most genes share the conserved motifs 1, 6, and 10. Based on the 41 candidate genes, 341 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were detected, including five replicated types: single, double, triple, quintuple, and sextuple nucleotide replications. Among these sequence repeat (SSR) loci, 323 loci were used to design 969 specific primers, and 362 primer pairs were selected randomly and evaluated using 12 Chinese cabbage accessions with different heading types. 23 primer pairs resulting with clear, polymorphic bands, combined with other 127 markers, was used to construct a linkage map by using an F2 population containing 214 lines derived from the hybrid of the overlapping heading Chinese cabbage “14Q-141” and the outward curling heading Chinese cabbage “14Q-279.” The result showed that the sequences of markers in the genetic linkage map and the physical map was consistent in general. Our study could help to accelerate the breeding process of leafy head quality in Chinese cabbage.

Keywords: Chinese cabbage, leaf ad-ab polarity, SSR, genetic linkage map, marker-assisted selection

Introduction

Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis) is an important leafy vegetable grown worldwide and one of the most consumed vegetables in Asia. With the improvement of life quality, the leafy head appearance of Chinese cabbage is of increasing concern to both the consumers and breeders (Mao et al., 2014; Liang et al., 2016). Chinese cabbage goes through three developmental stages to produce a leafy head, namely, seedling, rosette, and heading (Yu et al., 2013). The leaves grow flat in the seedling and rosette stages, whereas in the heading stage they curve inwardly and show a large abaxial surface. Leaf incurvature is influenced by leaf ad-ab polarity, and is a precondition for the formation of leafy heads (Mao et al., 2014; Liang et al., 2016). Therefore, studies on leaf ad-ab polarity is helpful for improving the commercial traits of Chinese cabbage (Yu et al., 2013; Mao et al., 2014).

Leaf heading is a complicated quantitative trait controlled by various of genes (Yu et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014). With the completion of the whole genome sequencing of the model plant A. thaliana and a variety of other plants (Initiative, 2000; Wang et al., 2011), as well as the deep research in molecular biology and genetics, it has been found that the regulatory network controlling ad-ab polarity mainly involves abaxial patterning genes, adaxial patterning genes, WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX (WOX) genes, YABBY genes, and small RNAs genes (Yamaguchi et al., 2012). In angiosperm models, the adaxial polarity is regulated by genes of the class III homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-ZIPIII) family [REVOLUTA (REV), ATHB8, PHAVOLUTA (PHV), and PHB] (Mcconnell et al., 2001; Emery et al., 2003), Myb, and LOB domain transcription factors ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (AS1) and AS2 (Lin et al., 2003; Iwakawa et al., 2007). In contrast, the abaxial polarity is specified by the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTORS (ARF3 and ARF4) (Pekker et al., 2005), KANADI family genes (KAN1, KAN2, and KAN3) (Eshed et al., 2001, 2004; Kerstetter et al., 2001), and small RNAs miR165/166 (Kidner and Martienssen, 2004). WUS-related homeobox (WOX) genes (WOX1, WOX3), and YABBY genes are involved in adaxial/abaxial patterning and subsequent flat leaf growth (Kidner and Timmermans, 2007; Vandenbussche et al., 2009; Nakata et al., 2012). In addition, leaf ad-ab polarity is also regulated by microRNAs and tasiRNAs, which include ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1), ARGONAUTE7 (AGO7), RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 6 (RDR6), SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3), SERRATE (SE), DICER-LIKE1 (DCL1) and DICER-LIKE4 (DCL4) (Moon and Hake, 2011). Furthermore, 45 genes (Version 1.5) involved in leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity establishment were detected in Chinese Cabbage (Liang et al., 2016). Chinese cabbage and Arabidopsis thaliana both belong to Cruciferae, giving the collinearity of the two genomes, most genes involved in leaf ad-ab polarity establishment are concluded to be conserved between these two genome.

Developing and utilizing molecular markers related to leaf ad-ab polarity establishment may lead to a better marker-assisted selection in breeding. SSR or microsatellites, are iterations of 1–6 bp nucleotide motifs. SSR molecular markers are widely distributed in genomes, have a high level of polymorphisms, are inherited co-dominantly and can be easily analyzed by PCR. Therefore, it becomes one of the most popular molecular markers and have been used widely to construct genetic linkage map, indentify varieties, and carry out diverse genetic analyses (Zhao et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2012). With the accomplishment of genome sequencing in Chinese cabbage (Wang et al., 2011), it is possible to develop the molecular markers related to leaf ad-ab polarity based on the information of regulators from Arabidopsis.

In this study, we developed specific SSR markers that correlate with the establishment of leaf ad-ab polarity. The repeat units and distribution characteristics of these SSR loci as well as the amplification efficiency and polymorphism level were analyzed. Our study will benefit to clarify the molecular mechanism of leafy head formation, and help to accelerate breeding process in leafy head quality in Chinese cabbage.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

An F2 population was used as the mapping population in this study. The female parent of the population was the overlapping heading Chinese cabbage “14Q-141,” and the male parent was the outward curling heading Chinese cabbage “14Q-279” (Figure 1). F1 was obtained from a cross between “14Q-141” and “14Q-279.” 214 F2 plants were gained after F1 selfing. The experiment was carried out at Hebei Agricultural University in Hebei, China. The seeds of the 214 F2 and their parental lines were sown in greenhouse and the seedlings were transplanted to an open field in September 2016, and kept growing until November 2016 in natural conditions.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Parents, F1 and representatives in F2 population.

The Sequences Updates of Genes Responsible for Leaf ad-ab Polarity in Chinese Cabbage

The sequences of genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity in Chinese cabbage was published in version 1.5 (Liang et al., 2016). The BRAD database1 (Cheng et al., 2011) was used to update the sequences information of these genes from version 1.5 to version 3.0. Table 1 showed the genes responsible for the establishment of leaf ad-ab polarity in Chinese cabbage.

TABLE 1.

Leaf ad-ab polarity–controlling genes in Chinese cabbage.

Regulation pathway Gene Arabidopsis thaliana genes Chinese cabbage genes Location in Linkage group
Adaxial determinants REV AT5G60690 BrREV1 (BraA10g018460.3C) chr10: 13671299..13675382
BrREV2 (BraA02g010200.3C) chr02: 4908251..4904176
PHB AT2G34710 BrPHB1 (BraA05g010360.3C) chr05: 5534983..5539344
BrPHB2 (BraA04g024760.3C) chr04: 17922205..17918117
PHV AT1G30490 BrPHV (BraA09g034560.3C) chr09: 27178071..27182489
ATHB8 AT4G32880 BrHB8.1 (BraA01g005160.3C) chr01: 2462816..2467248
BrHB8.2 (BraA08g016820.3C) chr08: 13619843..13624628
AS1 AT2G37630 BrAS1.1 (BraA05g007920.3C) chr05: 4047371..4048456
BrAS1.2 (BraA03g019630.3C) chr03: 9309263..9308220
AS2 AT1G65620 BrAS2 (BraA02g016770.3C) chr02: 8953550..8954158
Middle domain determinants YAB1 AT2G45190 BrYAB1.1 (BraA04g030760.3C) chr04: 21056868..21059180
BrYAB1.2 (BraA03g023630.3C) chr03: 11342365..11340257
YAB2 AT1G08465 BrYAB2.1 (BraA06g005620.3C) chr06: 3309705..3311007
BrYAB2.2 (BraA08g033150.3C) chr08: 21874379..21873237
BrYAB2.3 (BraA09g062760.3C) chr09: 43480055..43477632
YAB3 AT4G00180 – –
YAB5 AT2G26580 BrYAB5 (BraA03g025390.3C) chr03: 12518810..12521194
WOX1 AT3G18010 BrWOX1.1 (BraA05g029540.3C) chr05: 21857860..21859470
BrWOX1.2 (BraA03g038230.3C) chr03: 18917799..18915771
WOX3 AT2G28610 BrWOX3.1 (BraA04g020450.3C) chr04: 15389303..15390390
BrWOX3.2 (BraA03g024810.3C) chr03: 12196864..12195825
Abaxial determinants KAN1 AT2G28610 BrKAN1 (BraA10g023200.3C) chr10: 16161361..16168134
KAN2 AT1G32240 BrKAN2.1 (BraA09g032840.3C) chr09: 25471282..25477168
BrKAN2.2 (BraA05g023490.3C) chr05: 17380156..17384804
KAN3 AT4G17695 BrKAN3.1 (BraA01g009320.3C) chr01: 4661501..4658601
BrKAN3.2 (BraA08g012540.3C) chr08: 10833475..10830673
ARF3 AT2G33860 BrARF3.1 (BraA05g011080.3C) chr05: 5950051..5952569
BrARF3.2 (BraA04g024390.3C) chr04: 17725613..17723081
ARF4 AT5G60450 BrARF4.1 (BraA10g018230.3C) chr10: 13539330..13535905
BrARF4.2 (BraA02g010280.3C) chr02: 5008076..5008416
Small RNA pathway AGO1 AT1G48410 BrAGO1.1 (BraA05g020200.3C) chr05: 13144642..13150296
AGO7 AT1G69440 BrAGO7 (BraA07g030370.3C) chr07: 22224668..22227518
AGO10 AT5G43810 BrAGO10.1 (BraA06g043560.3C) chr06: 28421795..28417452
BrAGO10.2 (BraA09g019960.3C) chr09: 12912026..12912769
SGS3 AT5G23570 BrSGS (BraA06g031000.3C) chr06: 21377862..21380043
RDR6 AT3G49500 BrRDR6 (BraA01g023640.3C) chr07: 13537572..13541477
HYL1 AT1G09700 BrHYL1.1 (BraA06g006590.3C) chr06: 3729485..3727977
BrHYL1.2 (BraA08g032470.3C) chr08: 21597984..21599798
DCL1 AT1G01040 BrDCL1 (BraA10g000840.3C) chr10: 428538.423842
DCL4 AT5G20320 BrDCL4 (BraA10g020250.3C) chr10: 14712105.14721149
SE AT2G27100 BrSE1 (BraA07g018000.3C) chr07: 15424372.15427821
BrSE2 (BraA04g019460.3C) chr04: 14704649.14701441
Open in a new tab

Motif Display and Phylogenetic Analyses of Genes Responsible for Leaf ad-ab Polarity in Chinese Cabbage

To search the conserved motifs of the proteins, the amino acid sequences of the 41 genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity in Chinese cabbage were uploaded and analyzed using the online tool MEME Suite 5.1.12 (Bailey et al., 2009). The amino acid sequences of these genes in A. thaliana were downloaded from the TAIR database3 (Rhee et al., 2003). The ClustalW 2.0 (Larkin et al., 2007) and MEGA6.0 (Tamura et al., 2013) software were used to construct the phylogenetic tree. The analysis of the conserved motifs was conducted using Pfam4 (Sara et al., 2019) and SMART (Letunic et al., 2009). The analyses of collinearity and visualization for the genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity were done using MCScan X (Wang et al., 2012) and TBtoolse5 (Chen et al., 2020), respectively.

SSR Identification and Primer Design

Based on the target gene and its upstream (5 kb) and downstream (5 kb) sequences (Gong et al., 2014). SSR primers were identified and located by MIcroSAtellite (MISA) (Thiel et al., 2003) software with Perl. The search criteria was set to be as follow: ≥ten repeat units for mononucleotides, ≥seven repeat units for dinucleotides, and ≥five repeat units for tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotides. The interrupted compound SSRs were also listed as search targets when the interval was less than or equal to 10 bp. Primer pairs were designed based on the sequences of the identified SSR using Primer 3.0 with Perl. The parameters of Primer 3.0 were set as follows: (a) melting temperature between 55°C and 65°C; (b) GC content between 40% and 60%; (c) primer length between 18 and 27 bases; and (d) PCR products length between 100 and 300 bp. The other parameters were set with default values. 969 SSR primer pairs were designed in all.

DNA Extraction

DNA was extracted from young leaves of the F2 population by the CTAB method (Murray and Thompson, 1980; Rogers and Bendich, 1985). 5–10 μL genomic DNA was used to assess the sample quality using 1.0% agarose gel. A NanoDrop2000 spectrometer was used to assess the DNA quality and concentration.

Assessment of SSR Polymorphisms

The validation of polymorphic primers was done using 12 Chinese cabbage accessions with different heading traits selected from the F2 population. 362 pairs of SSR primers were selected from the newly designed primers and were used to detect the SSR polymorphisms among the 12 accessions. The primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China. A total volume of 10.0 μL was used to perform PCR, including 1.0 μL of genomic DNA (50 ng/μL), 0.8 μl of dNTPs (2.5 mmol/L), 0.5 μL of each of forward and reverse primers (50 ng/μL), 1 μL of 10 × PCR buffer (Mg2+), 0.1 μL of Taq DNA polymerase (2.5 U/μL, TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and 6.1 μL H2O. The reactions conditions were as follows: 3 min at 94°C; then 35 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 30 s at the proper annealing temperature, 45 s at 72°C, and a final elongation 5 min at 72°C. After the PCR, the products were separated using 7% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and visualized by silver nitrate staining.

Genetic Map Construction

The markers to construct the F2 genetic map were selected from 581 insertion-deletion (InDel) markers, 60 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, 123 random SSR markers, and 362 ad-ab polarity related SSR markers. The genotypes of parents “CC-48” and “PC-101” were screened using the 60K B. napus array developed by array TraitGenetics (Germany), resulting in 5,795 polymorphic SNPs. The SNP markers were selected from the TraitGenetics dataset. The BRAD database were used to design the InDel markers and Primer Premier 5.0 (Lalitha, 2004) were used to design the random SSR markers. Native-PAGE method were used to analyze the genotypes of F2 population with InDel and SSR markers. A 96-well LightScanner instrument was used for SNP genotyping by high-resolution melting analysis of small amplicons.

The genotypes data were classified as type “a” or “b” based on whether they were the parents of “14Q-141” or “14Q-279,” the undefined and missing data were showed by “−.” JoinMap version 4.0 software was used to construct genetic maps for F2 populations (Van Ooijen, 2006). After creating the population nodes, the markers were assigned into the linkage groups (LGs) based on the LOD value of 8.0–10.0. With the method of Kosambi, frequencies of recombination were transformed into centiMorgans (cM) to calculate genetic distance. Mapchart 2.32 was used to draw the map (Voorrips, 2002). A comparison map of genetic linkage distance and physical position was constructed using the ALLMAPS software6 (Tang et al., 2015).

Results

Classification and Collinearity Analysis of Genes

In A. thaliana, a total of 26 genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity were identified, including genes of transcription factors and small RNA pathways (Liang et al., 2016). By comparing with these Arabidopsis genes, 41 orthologs genes were detected in Chinese cabbage, including 10 transcription factors for adaxial determination, 10 transcription factors for middle domain determination, 9 transcription factors for abaxial determination, and 12 small RNAs for ad-ab polarity. According to the genomic sequence information of A. thaliana and Chinese cabbage, orthologous genes related to leaf ad-ab polarity establishment, except for AT4G00180, were all obtained in Chinese cabbage. These genes includes 10 single copies, 14 double copies, and one triple copies (Figure 2). A total of four single copies, 11 double copies, and one triple copies were detected in the transcription factor pathway, with the proportion of single copy to multiple copies being 1:3. In the small RNA pathway, a total of six single copies, three double copies, and no triple copies were detected, with the proportion of single copy to multiple copies being 2:1 (Figure 3). 60% of the genes exist as double or triple copies in Chinese cabbage.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Synteny analysis of leaf ad-ab polarity–controlling genes between Chinese cabbage and Arabidopsis.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

The copy number of orthorlogous of leaf ad-ab polarity–controlling genes between Arabidopsis and Chinese cabbage.

Distribution of the Genes Responsible for the Leaf ad-ab Polarity and the Characterization of SSR Loci in Chinese Cabbage

Genes responsible for the leaf ad-ab polarity are distributed on 10 chromosomes in Chinese cabbage, with most of them (6, 14.63%) occurring on chromosome A05 and only a very few (2, 4.88%) on chromosome A01. Genes on other chromosomes are distributed evenly. A total of 341 SSR loci were developed for the genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity in Chinese cabbage. Among the 41 genes, four contain 1–3 SSR loci, nine contain 4–6 SSR loci, 12 contain 7–9 SSR loci, 13 contain 10–12 SSR loci, and only three contain more than 12 SSR loci (Figure 4). 55 SSR loci are located within the genes. According to the principle of SSR primer design, 323 SSR loci were used to design the corresponding SSR primers. A total of 362 SSR primer pairs were selected for this study.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

Number of SSRs in leaf ad-ab polarity–controlling genes in Chinese cabbage.

Structure and Motif Composition of Genes Responsible for Leaf ad-ab Polarity in Chinese Cabbage

The exon-intron organization of all the identified genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity was analyzed to get more insight into their evolution in Chinese cabbage. As shown in Figure 5, the length of the genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity is mostly within 6 kb, with only BrDCL1 and BrDCL4 reaching 7 and 9 kb, respectively. All the genes possess 1–25 exons. Genes BrAS2, BrAS1.1, and BrAS1.2 have only one exon and genes BrDCL4 has 25 exons. The distributions of exons and sequence length among these genes present obvious distinctions. A schematic representing the structure of four different regulatory pathway proteins is shown in Figure 5; the 30 motifs are named Motifs 1–30. Motifs 1, 6, and 10 are widely distributed domains. The members in the same groups are usually composed by a similar motif composition. For example, BrREV, BrPHB, BrPHV, and BrATHB8 in the adaxial determinant pathway contain relatively more motifs and show a highly similar motif distribution. The number of motifs varies greatly. In adaxial determinant pathway, genes BrPHV, BrPHB.1, and BrPHB.2 have the largest number of motifs (24), whereas gene BrAS2 contains the fewest motifs, only Motif 4. Among the homologous genes BrARF4.1, BrARF4.2, BrAGO10.1, and BrAGO10.2, the conserved motifs of one gene are partially lost in another. A total of two loci are located in the START conserved domain, one in gene BrPHV and the other in BrREV1.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

The gene structure and motif analyses of leaf ad-ab polarity–controlling genes in Chinese cabbage. The exon-intron structure of leaf ad-ab polarity–controlling genes were showed on the left, and schematic diagram of amino acid motifs of leaf ad-ab polarity–controlling proteins were showed on the right. (A) Adaxial-controlling genes in Chinese cabbage; (B) Middle domain-controlling genes in Chinese cabbage; (C) Abaxial-determinant genes in Chinese cabbage; (D) Small RNA-controlling genes in Chinese cabbage.

SSR Loci Analysis of the Genes Responsible for Leaf ad-ab Polarity in Chinese Cabbage

The repeat-type distributions of 341 SSR loci are shown in Table 2. Repeat types of SSR loci of the genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity are abundant in Chinese cabbage. Five repeat types are identified: mononucleotide (231) are the most abundant repeats (67.74%), and the following are dinucleotides (19.65%) and trinucleotides (9.38%); pentanucleotides and hexanucleotides are the fewest (0.30%, respectively). No tetranucleotides are found in the repeats. A/T, AT/TA, AAG, CAATG, and TAGATA are the predominant motifs. Mononucleotide repeats contain seven double-mononucleotide motifs, (A)11g(A)10, (G)10tgtagc(T)16, (A)10tttatc(T)11, (T)15(G)12, (T)10attttgg(A)10, (A)10gttcac(T)11, and (A)10tt(A)13. Dinucleotide repeats contain two double-dinucleotide motifs, (TG)10(TA)8 and (TC)9(TA)8.

TABLE 2.

Type, number and frequency of SSRs from leaf ad-ab polarity–controlling genes in Chinese cabbage.

Repeat types Types of repeat motif Total number of repeat motif Percentage(%) Type of predominant motif
Mononucleotide 4 238 69.79 T/A
Dinucleotide 8 69 20.23 TA/AT
Trinucleotide 26 32 9.38 AAG
Tetranucleotide 0 0 0 –
Pentanucleotide 1 1 0.30 GAATG
Hexanucleotide 1 1 0.30 TAGATA
Total 40 341 100
Open in a new tab

Screening and Polymorphic Analysis of SSR Primers

362 pairs of primers were selected at random from the 969 pairs for evaluation using 12 Chinese cabbage accessions with different heading types. The results show that clear amplification products can be obtained by 213 (58.84%) primer pairs, of which 89 (24.59%) primer pairs resulted in polymorphic bands (Supplementary Figure S1A), and 68 (18.78%) primer pairs gave no polymorphism (Supplementary Figure S1B). In addition, 149 (41.16%) primer pairs failed to give any amplification products (Supplementary Figure S1C), and 56 (15.47%) primer pairs resulted in non-specific bands (Supplementary Figure S1D).

Among the 89 polymorphic SSR primers, 23 pairs with high polymorphism and clear bands were selected to analyze the 214 Chinese cabbage accessions. These SSR markers distribute on chromosomes A01, A02, A03, A04, A05, A06, A08, A09, and A10. These primers amplified 53 polymorphic bands, and the numbers of amplified fragments varied from two to four. On average, each primer amplifies 2.3 bands. Two alleles were detected by 17 SSR primers, three alleles by five SSR primers, and four alleles by one SSR primer. The primer S119 located on chromosome A05 detect the highest number of alleles (four). 78.6% of the accessions were amplified with one allele (Supplementary Table S1).

Genetic Map Construction

34 SSRs (23 specific SSR primers and 11 random SSR primers), 13 SNPs, and 103 InDel markers distributed over 10 linkage groups (LGs) were used to construct the linkage map. The total map length is 1747.57 cM with an average distance of 11.65 cM between adjacent markers (Figure 6). The most markers (23) were in linkage group (LG) A02 and the fewest (7) in LG A04. The length of each LG ranged from 90.32 to 235.61 cM. The biggest gap in the genetic map was 24.63 cM in LG A04, and the smallest gap was 5.65 cM in LG A05. The result showed that the sequences of markers in genetic linkage map and physical map are generally consistent, with only three groups of markers distribute in the LG A01, A05, and A08 showing different sequences (Figure 7).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Open in a new tab

A genetic linkage map of the F2 population. Recombination distances (cM) are showed on the left, marker names on the right of each linkage group.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Open in a new tab

A genetic linkage map and a physical map constructed based on F2 population. In each group, recombination distances (cM) are showed on the left, physical distances (Mb) are showed on the right, and their correspondences are showed with lines in the middle.

Discussion

Analysis of the Evolution of the Relationship Between SSR Loci, Gene Structure, and Conserved Motifs

During plant growth and development, the leaf shapes of different species and the same plant at different growth stages may show diverse morphology. It was found that the leaf ad-ab patterning can affect leaf curvature (Kidner and Timmermans, 2010; Yamaguchi et al., 2012). Based on 26 genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity in A. thaliana, we identified 41 orthologous genes in Chinese cabbage by a comparative genomic analysis. 75.6% of these genes contains double or triple copies in Chinese cabbage, indicating that they went through duplication and were reserved after whole genome triploidization. Multiple copy genes were also detected in the research of genes for glucosinolate (GS) biosynthesis in Chinese cabbage (Gong et al., 2014). However, among 12 orthologs genes detected in the small RNA pathway responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity, 42% genes have one or no copies in Chinese cabbage, and none has more than two copies. It was speculated that Chinese cabbage may have experienced a triplication of the whole genome and then undergone diploidy to delete one or two gene copies (Cheng et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2012). We inferred that there was a large amount of gene lost or rearranged during this process (Wang et al., 2011; Cheng et al., 2013). It remains to be further verified whether the leaf morphology establishment is affected by the different copies of leaf ad-ab polarity genes in various breeding materials.

Gene structure analysis is useful in mining the relationship between gene family evolution and gene duplication. The number and distribution of introns and exons may be related to gene evolution. We found that obvious differences exist in the distribution of exons and sequence length among four group of genes. We speculate that these genes may play distinct roles in leaf development. Through motif analysis, we found that Motifs 1, 6, and 10 are widely distributed domains, suggesting that these domains may be very important for the gene function. Between the homologous genes BrARF4.1, BrARF4.2, BrAGO10.1, and BrAGO10.2, the conserved motifs of one gene was partially lost in another, suggesting a possibility of fragments lost during evolution. The striking dissimilarity between four groups of genes provides useful evidence for the study of genome duplication and phylogenetic evolution.

Development of Specific SSR Markers for Genes Controlling Leaf ad-ab Polarity

Simple sequence repeats markers are widely used because they are simple, rapid, low-cost, and have good repeatability. In molecular-assisted selection breeding, analyzing the diversity by using the SSR markers based on the target functional gene sequences or their upstream and downstream regions can overcome the problem of identification bias for non-gene region. In this study, 341 SSR loci were developed based on the 41 genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity, with the mononucleotide repeats (242, 70.96%) the most common and showing a strong bias toward A/T. 969 specific primers were designed from these SSR loci. These studies laid a foundation for further research on head-related traits in Chinese cabbage.

Application of Specific SSR Markers

Simple sequence repeats markers with wide genomic distribution and a high degree of polymorphism are widely used in genetic analyses. A total of 6 jujube cultivars and wild types were used to verify the polymorphism of 1000 SSR primers; it was observed that, among the germplasms, 725 pairs (72.5%) were clear and effective and 511 pairs (51.1%) were polymorphic (Xiao et al., 2015). Eight Chinese cabbage inbred lines were used to screen the polymorphism of 77 SSR primers; it was shown that 49 SSR primers (63.64%) could amplify clear bands and 16 of them (20.8%) were polymorphic (Gong et al., 2014). In this study, 12 Chinese cabbage accessions with different heading types were used to evaluate the polymorphism of 362 SSR primer pairs, and 23 pairs (6.35%) resulting in high polymorphism and clear bands were selected to construct the linkage map. QTL analysis for 4 leafy head traits of Chinese cabbage was performed, which were head top shape (HTS), Head height (HH), Head Weight (HWe), Plant weight (PWe). The result showed that the sequences of markers in the linkage map were generally consistent with that of the physical map, 12 QTLs were mapped including 6 QTLs with 7 specific SSR coseparation, indicating that these specific SSR markers can be used in the further study and the candidate genes could be quickly indentified with them. However, the polymorphism of these SSRs was low, possibly because the genes responsible for leaf ad-ab polarity were highly conserved during evolution. Therefore, development of primers from other SSR loci of functional genes and other molecular markers such as InDel and SNP are still needed.

As the gene sequences are conserved between Chinese cabbage and other Brassica plants, SSR primers from Chinese cabbage are transferable to relative species. In our study, 55 SSR loci were located with the genes and two were in START conserved domain. The molecular genetic map constructed by these genes specific SSR markers, especially markers within the genes, can provide reference for linkage and QTL mapping of target genes among related species. Furthermore, as the reference markers, these SSR markers can be used to integrate the molecular genetic maps among relative species, thus providing a new method for comparative genomics research.

Conclusion

Establishment of leaf ad-ab polarity is tightly related to leaf incurvature in Chinese cabbage, which is a main factor result in the formation of a leafy head. In this study, by comparing the sequences of genes controlling leaf ad-ab polarity in A. thaliana, 41 candidate orthologous genes were found in Chinese cabbage. Based on these gene, 341 SSRs were detected and characterized. A genetic linkage map were constructed by SSR and other molecular markers screened. The result showed that the sequences of markers in genetic linkage and physical map was generally consistent, suggesting that these SSR markers were valuable for assisted-selective breeding in Chinese cabbage.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

YG and YL performed the research and wrote the manuscript. XL, NL, and XS surveyed the morphological characteristics. XZ and DF performed the assessment of SSR polymorphisms. ML, SX, and AG performed the motif display and phylogenetic analyses of genes. YW and XC performed the genetic map construction analysis. NL and JZ reviewed the manuscript. JZ and SS designed the research and reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding. This work was supported by the National Key R&D of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFD0101802 and 2016YFD0100204-17), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31930098, 31902005, 31872100, and 31801857), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei (C2018204135), the Science and Technology Support Program of Hebei (16226304D-2), and the International Cooperation Project in the Science and Technology Support Program of Hebei (Grant Nos. 17396315D and 2019YX023A).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.00773/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (5.6MB, TIF)
Click here for additional data file. (22.5KB, xls)

References

  1. Bailey T. L., Boden M., Buske F. A., Frith M., Grant C. E., Clementi L., et al. (2009). MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37 W202–W208. 10.1093/nar/gkp335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen C. J., Chen H., Zhang Y., Thomas H. R., Frank M. H., He Y. H., et al. (2020). TBtools - an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/289660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng F., Liu S., Wu J., Fang L., Sun S., Liu B., et al. (2011). BRAD, the genetics and genomics database for Brassica plants. BMC Plant Biol. 11:136. 10.1186/1471-2229-11-136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng F., Mandáková T., Wu J., Xie Q., Lysak M. A., Wang X. (2013). Deciphering the diploid ancestral genome of the mesohexaploid Brassica rapa. Plant Cell 25 1541–1554. 10.1105/tpc.113.110486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng F., Wu J., Fang L., Sun S., Liu B., Lin K., et al. (2012). Biased gene fractionation and dominant gene expression among the subgenomes of Brassica rapa. PLoS One 7:e36442. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Emery J. F., Floyd S. K., Alvarez J., Eshed Y., Hawker N. P., Izhaki A., et al. (2003). Radial patterning of Arabidopsis shoots by class III HD-ZIP and KANADI genes. Curr. Biol. 13 1768–1774. 10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eshed Y., Baum S. F., Perea J. V., Bowman J. L. (2001). Establishment of polarity in lateral organs of plants. Curr. Biol. 11 1251–1260. 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00392-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eshed Y., Izhaki A., Baum S. F., Floyd S. K., Bowman J. L. (2004). Asymmetric leaf development and blade expansion in Arabidopsis are mediated by KANADI and YABBY activities. Development 131 2997–3006. 10.1242/dev.01186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao Y., Luo S. X., Wang Y. H., Gu A. X., Zhao J. J., Chen X. P., et al. (2012). Association analysis of bolting and flowering time with SSR and InDel markers in Chinese cabbage. Acta Hortic. Sin. 39 1081–1089. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gong H. Y., Luo S. X., Gu A. X., Wang Y. H., Zhao J. J., Shen S. X. (2014). Development of SSR markers linked to glucosinolate synthesis genes in chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis). J. Agric. Biotechnol. 22 1232–1241. [Google Scholar]
  11. Initiative T. A. G. (2000). Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408 796–815. 10.1038/35048692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Iwakawa H., Iwasaki M., Kojima S., Ueno Y., Soma T., Tanaka H., et al. (2007). Expression of the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene in the adaxial domain of Arabidopsis leaves represses cell proliferation in this domain and is critical for the development of properly expanded leaves. Plant J. 51 173–184. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03132.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kerstetter R. A., Bollman K., Taylor R. A., Bomblies K., Poethig R. S. (2001). KANADI regulates organ polarity in Arabidopsis. Nature 411 706–709. 10.1038/35079629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kidner C. A., Martienssen R. A. (2004). Spatially restricted microRNA directs leaf polarity through ARGONAUTE1. Nature 428 81–84. 10.1038/nature02366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kidner C. A., Timmermans M. C. (2007). Mixing and matching pathways in leaf polarity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10 13–20. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kidner C. A., Timmermans M. C. (2010). Signaling sides adaxial-abaxial patterning in leaves. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 91 141–168. 10.1016/S0070-2153(10)91005-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lalitha S. (2004). Primer Premier 5. Biotech Softw. Int. Rep. 1 270–272. 10.1089/152791600459894 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Larkin M. A., Blackshields G., Brown N. P., Chenna R., Mcgettigan P. A., Mcwilliam H., et al. (2007). Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23 2947–2948. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Letunic I., Doerks T., Bork P. (2009). SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 37 D229–D232. 10.1093/nar/gkn808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liang J. L., Liu B., Wu J., Cheng F., Wang X. W. (2016). Genetic variation and divergence of genes involved in leaf adaxial-Abaxial polarity establishment in Brassica rapa. Front. Plant Sci. 7:94. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin W. C., Shuai B., Springern P. S. (2003). The Arabidopsis LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES-domain gene ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 functions in the repression of KNOX gene expression and in adaxial-abaxial patterning. Plant Cell 15 2241–2252. 10.1105/tpc.014969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mao Y., Wu F., Yu X., Bai J., Zhong W., He Y. (2014). MicroRNA319a-targeted Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis TCP genes modulate head shape in chinese cabbage by differential cell division arrest in leaf regions. Plant Physiol. 164 710–720. 10.1104/pp.113.228007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mcconnell J. R., Emery J., Eshed Y., Bao N., Bowman J., Barton M. K. (2001). Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature 411 709–713. 10.1038/35079635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moon J., Hake S. (2011). How a leaf gets its shape. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14 24–30. 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Murray M. G., Thompson W. F. (1980). Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 8 4321–4326. 10.1093/nar/8.19.4321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nakata M., Matsumoto N., Tsugeki R., Rikirsch E., Laux T., Okada K. (2012). Roles of the middle domain-specific WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX genes in early development of leaves in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24 519–535. 10.1105/tpc.111.092858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pekker I., Alvarez J. P., Eshed Y. (2005). Auxin response factors mediate Arabidopsis organ asymmetry via modulation of KANADI activity. Plant Cell 17 2899–2910. 10.1105/tpc.105.034876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rhee S. Y., Beavis W. D., Berardini T. Z., Chen G., Dixon D. A., Doyle A., et al. (2003). The Arabidopsis information resource (TAIR): a model organism database providing a centralized, curated gateway to Arabidopsis biology, research materials and community. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 224–228. 10.1093/nar/gkg076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rogers S. O., Bendich A. J. (1985). Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummifified plant tissues. Plant Mol. Biol. 5 69–76. 10.1007/BF00020088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sara E. G., Jaina M., Alex B., Eddy S. R., Luciani A., Potter S. C., et al. (2019). The pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47 D427–D432. 10.1093/nar/gky995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D. S., Filipski A., Kumar S. (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis Version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30 2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tang H., Woodhouse M. R., Cheng F., Schnable J. C., Pedersen B. S., Conant G., et al. (2012). Altered patterns of fractionation and exon deletions in Brassica rapa support a two-step model of paleohexaploidy. Genetics 190 1563–1574. 10.1534/genetics.111.137349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tang H. B., Zhang X. T., Miao C. Y., Zhang J. S., Ming R., Schnable J. C., et al. (2015). ALLMAPS: robust scaffold ordering based on multiple maps. Genome Biol. 16:3. 10.1186/s13059-014-0573-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thiel T., Michalek W., Varshney R. K., Graner A. (2003). Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet. 106 411–422. 10.1007/s00122-002-1031-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Ooijen J. W. (2006). JoinMap 4, Software for the Calculation of Genetic Linkage Maps in Experimental Populations. Wageningen: Kyazma BV. [Google Scholar]
  36. Vandenbussche M., Horstman A., Zethof J., Koes R., Rijpkema A. S., Gerats T. (2009). Differential recruitment of WOX transcription factors for lateral development and organ fusion in Petunia and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21 2269–2283. 10.1105/tpc.109.065862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Voorrips R. E. (2002). MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J. Hered. 93 77–78. 10.1093/jhered/93.1.77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang X., Wang H., Wang J., Sun R., Wu J., Liu S., et al. (2011). Brassica rapa genome sequencing project consortium. the genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat. Genet. 43 1035–1039. 10.1038/ng.919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang Y., Tang H., DeBarry J. D., Tan X., Li J., Wang X., et al. (2012). MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:e49. 10.1093/nar/gkr1293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang Y., Wu F., Bai J., He Y. (2014). BrpSPL9 (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis SPL9) controls the earliness of heading time in Chinese cabbage. Plant Biotechnol J. 12 312–321. 10.1111/pbi.12138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Xiao J., Zhao J., Liu M. J., Liu P., Dai L., Zhao Z. H. (2015). Genome-wide characterization of simple sequence repeat (SSR) Loci in Chinese Jujube and Jujube SSR primer transferability. PLoS One 10:e0127812. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yamaguchi T., Nukazuka A., Tsukaya H. (2012). Leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity specification and lamina outgrowth: evolution and development. Plant Cell Physiol. 53 1180–1194. 10.1093/pcp/pcs074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yu X., Wang H., Zhong W., Bai J., Liu P., He Y. (2013). QTL mapping of leafy heads by genome resequencing in the RIL population of Brassica rapa. PLoS One 8:e76059. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhao J., Diaan C. L., Lou P., Wang Y., Wu J., Wang X., et al. (2008). Quantitative trait loci analysis of phytate and phosphate concentrations in seeds and leaves of Brassica rapa. Plant Cell Environ. 31 887–900. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01791.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (5.6MB, TIF)
Click here for additional data file. (22.5KB, xls)

Data Availability Statement

All datasets presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.

Articles from Frontiers in Genetics are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES