Skip to main content
Public Health in Practice logoLink to Public Health in Practice
letter
. 2020 Jul 31;1:100034. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100034

COVID-19 and autism: Uncertainty, distress and feeling forgotten

JA Patel a,b,, AA Badiani c, FBH Nielsen b, S Assi a, V Unadkat a, B Patel f, C Courtney f, L Hallas g
PMCID: PMC7392884  PMID: 34173571

Depression, struggling to cope with change and difficulty interacting with others. These are some of the challenges that people with autism face at the best of times. Yet, in the midst of a pandemic, these challenges were amplified. This article highlights some of the difficulties faced by people with autism and their families. Policymakers must recognise the complex needs of this group and the mental health toll that they face. People with autism will struggle to develop new routines as the UK emerges out of lockdown, whilst localised or subsequent lockdowns may cause significant distress - particular attention must be paid to this group of people and attempts must be made to minimise and alleviate their distress.

There are 700,000 people with autism spectrum disorders in the UK, ranging from high-functioning people with Asperger’s Syndrome to people with severely debilitating autism [1]. Generally, they display restrictive and repetitive behaviours and a strong preference for routines - disruption of their routines can cause distress [2]. Policies have rightly been implemented to protect those deemed extremely vulnerable, including delivering them essential supplies, their basic care needs and encouraging them to remain isolated from others. Yet other groups, such as people with autism, have largely been forgotten and left isolated, being confined to an afterthought [3]. Only in response to a legal challenge, which occurred more than two weeks after the implementation of lockdown, were the rules relaxed for people with learning difficulties and autism, allowing them to leave their homes more than once daily [4]. The only resources available are guidance and recommendations from non-profit organisations. For example, the National Autistic Society provided information for people with autism and their families about planning new routines and how to process information [5], whereas Autistica produced webinars about mental health management and coping with uncertainty. It is therefore unsurprising that the BBC reported that these people felt “forgotten” and “isolated” [3].

COVID-19 is likely to have increased distress for people with autism. First, adapting to increased hygiene and sanitation recommendations, social isolation and social distancing will have broken the daily routines of people with autism, causing distress [2]. Second, the uncertainty surrounding COVID-19 and the constant stream of new information, could overwhelm people with autism, increasing distress. Third, caregivers were unable to give warning signals of impending change, which normally allow people with autism to respond to change better and with less resistance [6]. The absence of these warning signals due to the immediate (rather than gradual) enforcement of lockdown, would have led to people with autism experiencing greater levels of distress.

For people with autism, the additional distress and trauma caused by COVID-19 are likely to have worsened their core symptoms of autism [2] and mental health. Overall, 20% of people with autism spectrum disorders are diagnosed with anxiety, whilst 11% suffer from depressive disorders [6]. The additional distress caused by the pandemic will mean that people with autism and an existing psychological disorder are likely to have experienced a worsening of their mental health - even those people with autism who do not have a mental health comorbidity were at an increased risk of developing them, particularly anxiety [7] and depression [8]. Despite the current lack of published research, experts believe COVID-19 likely worsened the mental health of people with autism, particularly due to the uncertainty surrounding the situation [9].

The mental health and welfare of family members who provide home-care to people with autism must also be considered, especially because they suffer from increased rates of stress, depression and anxiety [10]. There may be several sources of increased stress. First, establishing new routines for people with autism may generate challenging behaviour and resistance, especially if implemented suddenly and without warning [6], increasing stress for caregivers. Second, COVID-19 placed additional demands on caregivers because they received little external support or respite from delivering care during the lockdown, factors known to increase the burden placed upon caregivers [11]. The additional stress may have worsened caregivers’ mental health, with this increased burden associated with higher rates of self-reported depression and anxiety [11] – these conditions would have effected their daily functioning, preventing them from delivering optimal care.

Overall, the changing routines and uncertainty caused by COVID-19 will have brought distress to people with autism, worsening both its core symptoms and their mental health - even as the nation leaves lockdown, they will face fresh challenges and further uncertainty. Also, the additional demands of continuously caregiving without respite would have increased the caregiver burden, likely impacting their mental health and thereby the quality of care they delivered. Rather than being an afterthought, policymakers must understand that the needs of people with autism are vastly different from the general population. They must provide further mental health support for people with autism and their carers as the nation emerges from lockdown. In the event of further local lockdowns or a second wave of the pandemic, legislation must provide additional freedoms and support to people with autism. Policymakers must protect people with autism from acquiring COVID-19; however, this cannot be at the expense of the mental health needs of the population.

Declaration of competing interest

None declared.

References


Articles from Public Health in Practice are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES