Abstract
Myocardial infarction (MI) still remains a leading cause of mortality throughout the world. An adverse cardiac remodeling, such as hypertrophy and fibrosis, in non-infarcted area leads to uncompensated heart failure with cardiac dysfunction. We previously demonstrated that canstatin, a C-terminus fragment of type IV collagen α2 chain, exerted anti-remodeling effect against isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy model rats. In the present study, we examined whether a long-term administration of recombinant canstatin exhibits a cardioprotective effect against the adverse cardiac remodeling in MI model rats. Left anterior descending artery of male Wistar rats was ligated and recombinant mouse canstatin (20 μg/kg/day) was intraperitoneally injected for 28 days. Long-term administration of canstatin improved survival rate and significantly inhibited left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction after MI. Canstatin significantly inhibited scar thinning in the infarcted area and significantly suppressed cardiac hypertrophy, nuclear translocation of nuclear factor of activated T-cells, interstitial fibrosis and increase of myofibroblasts in the non-infarcted area. Canstatin significantly inhibited transforming growth factor-β1-induced differentiation of rat cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts. The present study for the first time demonstrated that long-term administration of recombinant canstatin exerts cardioprotective effects against adverse cardiac remodeling in MI model rats.
Subject terms: Pharmacology, Cardiovascular diseases, Acute coronary syndromes, Heart failure
Introduction
Myocardial infarction (MI), an ischemic heart disease, induced by occlusion of coronary artery remains a leading cause of mortality throughout the world1,2. Ischemic injury by coronary arterial occlusion evokes massive cardiomyocyte death, which in turn forms an infarcted area3,4. In the early phase of MI, cardiac fibroblasts contribute to repair the infarcted area through the activation of biological functions, such as proliferation, migration and differentiation into myofibroblasts5. Myofibroblasts characterized by an abundant expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) play a pivotal role during scar formation in the infarcted area through the synthesis of structural extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins3. Although maturation of scar tissue is important to maintain cardiac structure and function6, insufficient scar formation causes scar thinning, cardiac dysfunction and/or cardiac rupture3. The infarct size is an important in prognosis and mortality in MI patients7. On the other hand, the degree of cardiac remodeling in non-infarcted ventricles is also crucial in the prognosis of MI4. An adaptive cardiac hypertrophy in the non-infarcted area compensates the reduction of cardiac contractility8. In the chronic phase of MI, an interstitial fibrosis in the non-infarcted area is mainly induced by activated myofibroblasts, which increases ventricular stiffness9. The interstitial fibrosis and pathological cardiac hypertrophy result in eccentric hypertrophy with left ventricular (LV) wall thinning and dilatation4,9. The scar thinning in the infarcted area and the adverse cardiac remodeling in the non-infarcted area finally lead to uncompensated heart failure with cardiac dysfunction4. To date, an effective therapy to achieve a remission of the pathological condition after MI has not been established.
Canstatin, a C-terminus fragment of type IV collagen α2 chain, was discovered as an endogenous anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor peptide10. We previously demonstrated that canstatin exerts various biological effects in cardiac cells. Canstatin inhibited hypoxia-induced apoptosis in H9c2 rat cardiomyoblasts11. Canstatin promoted proliferation and secretion of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9, and inhibited contractile activity in myofibroblasts derived from the infarcted area of MI model rats12. We also clarified that canstatin was highly expressed in normal myocardium, but decreased in the infarcted area of MI model rats12,13. Moreover, we recently reported that a long-term administration of recombinant mouse canstatin suppressed isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis14. However, the effects of canstatin-treatment on MI have not been clarified. In the present study, we examined whether the long-term administration of recombinant mouse canstatin exhibits a cardioprotective effect against the scar formation and adverse cardiac remodeling in MI model rats.
Results
Canstatin improves survival rate in MI model rats
All rats in SHAM-operated group (SHAM + vehicle and SHAM + canstatin groups) were survived for 28 days [SHAM + vehicle: 100% (6/6, n = 6), SHAM + canstatin: 100% (6/6, n = 6)]. MI significantly decreased the survival rate compared with SHAM + vehicle group [MI + vehicle: 47.1% (8/17, n = 17) vs. SHAM + vehicle, P < 0.05], and canstatin improved it (72.7%: 8/11, n = 11) (Fig. 1).
Canstatin prevents LV dilatation and dysfunction in MI model rats
We examined the effects of canstatin on LV diameter and cardiac function at 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after MI by echocardiography (SHAM + vehicle and SHAM + canstatin: n = 6, MI + vehicle: n = 8–17, MI + canstatin: n = 8–11, Fig. 2A). The heart rate of rats was adjusted to approximately 400 beats per minutes by modulating the depth of anesthesia. MI significantly increased LV internal dimension at end-diastole (LVIDd) (P < 0.01, Fig. 2B) and LV internal dimension at end-systole (LVIDs) (P < 0.01, Fig. 2C). Administration of canstatin tended to inhibit the increase of LVIDd (Fig. 2B) and significantly inhibited the increase of LVIDs (P < 0.01, Fig. 2C). In addition, MI significantly decreased fractional shortening (FS) (P < 0.01, Fig. 2D) and ejection fraction (EF) (P < 0.01, Fig. 2E). Administration of canstatin significantly prevented the decrease of FS (P < 0.01, Fig. 2D) and EF (P < 0.01, Fig. 2E). Canstatin-alone administration had no effect on the LV diameter and cardiac function in the SHAM operated rats (Fig. 2B–E).
Canstatin prevents scar thinning in MI model rats
Scar thinning after MI is a risk factor for lethal cardiac rupture3,15. We examined the effects of canstatin on scar formation by picrosirius red staining (MI + vehicle and MI + canstatin: n = 8, Fig. 3A). Administration of canstatin significantly improved the scar thinning after MI (MI + vehicle: 469 ± 27 μm vs. MI + canstatin: 791 ± 115 μm, P < 0.05, Fig. 3B).
Canstatin inhibits cardiomyocyte hypertrophy of non-infarcted area in MI model rats
Cardiac hypertrophy of non-infarcted area was observed in the chronic phase of MI4. We examined the effects of canstatin on cardiac hypertrophy of non-infarcted area by measuring cross-sectional diameter of cardiomyocytes in LV using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining (SHAM + vehicle and SHAM + canstatin: n = 6, MI + vehicle and MI + canstatin: n = 8, Fig. 4A). MI significantly increased diameter of cardiomyocytes, which was significantly prevented by canstatin (MI + vehicle: 23.2 ± 0.3 μm vs. SHAM + vehicle: 18.2 ± 0.2 μm, P < 0.01; MI + canstatin: 17.6 ± 0.6 μm, P < 0.01 vs. MI + vehicle, Fig. 4B). Canstatin-alone administration had no effect on the diameter of cardiomyocytes (SHAM + canstatin: 17.2 ± 0.4 μm, Fig. 4B).
Canstatin prevents nuclear translocation of nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT)c4 in cardiomyocytes of non-infarcted area in MI model rats
Nuclear translocation of NFATc4 is associated with the transcription of hypertrophy-related genes in cardiomyocytes16. We previously reported that canstatin-administration inhibited nuclear translocation of NFATc4 in isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy model rats14. We then examined the effects of canstatin on nuclear translocation of NFATc4 in non-infarcted area by immunohistochemical staining (SHAM + vehicle and SHAM + canstatin: n = 6, MI + vehicle and MI + canstatin: n = 8, Fig. 5A). MI significantly induced nuclear translocation of NFATc4 in the cardiomyocytes of non-infarcted area, which was significantly prevented by canstatin (MI + vehicle: 372 ± 51% vs. SHAM + vehicle, P < 0.01; MI + canstatin: 215 ± 31%, P < 0.05 vs. MI + vehicle, Fig. 5B). Canstatin-alone administration had no effect on nuclear translocation of NFATc4 (SHAM + canstatin: 104 ± 4%, Fig. 5B).
Canstatin prevents interstitial fibrosis of non-infarcted area in MI model rats
Interstitial fibrosis of non-infarcted myocardium causes cardiac dysfunction by increasing myocardial stiffness9. We examined the effects of canstatin on interstitial fibrosis of non-infarcted area by picrosirius red staining (SHAM + vehicle and SHAM + canstatin: n = 6, MI + vehicle and MI + canstatin: n = 8, Fig. 6A). MI significantly increased interstitial fibrosis area of non-infarcted area, which was significantly prevented by canstatin (MI + vehicle: 10.6 ± 1.6% vs. SHAM + vehicle: 2.9 ± 0.3%, P < 0.01; MI + canstatin: 4.6 ± 0.7%, P < 0.01 vs. MI + vehicle, Fig. 6B). Canstatin-alone administration had no effect on the interstitial fibrosis (SHAM + canstatin: 3.1 ± 0.6%, Fig. 6B).
We also examined the expression of type I collagen in non-infarcted area by Western blotting (SHAM + vehicle and SHAM + canstatin: n = 6, MI + vehicle and MI + canstatin: n = 8, Fig. 6C). MI increased the expression of type I collagen, which was significantly prevented by canstatin (MI + vehicle: 349 ± 74% vs. SHAM + vehicle: 100 ± 14%, P < 0.05; MI + canstatin: 137 ± 24%, P < 0.05 vs. MI + vehicle, Fig. 6C). Canstatin-alone administration had no effect on the expression of type I collagen (SHAM + canstatin: 104 ± 15%, Fig. 6C).
Canstatin prevents differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts
During the development of adverse cardiac remodeling, cardiac fibroblasts differentiate into myofibroblasts, which highly express α-SMA and type I collagen, a main constituent for interstitial fibrosis9. We examined the effects of canstatin on the differentiation by immunohistochemical staining (SHAM + vehicle and SHAM + canstatin: n = 6, MI + vehicle and MI + canstatin: n = 8, Fig. 7A). MI significantly increased α-SMA-positive myofibroblasts in non-infarcted area, which was significantly prevented by canstatin (MI + vehicle: 312 ± 53% vs. SHAM + vehicle, P < 0.01; MI + canstatin: 113 ± 21%, P < 0.01 vs. MI + vehicle, Fig. 7B). Canstatin-alone administration had no effect on the number of myofibroblasts (SHAM + canstatin: 115 ± 29%, Fig. 7B).
We also performed in vitro experiments to clarify the direct effects of canstatin on transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-induced differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts by measuring expression of α-SMA (n = 7, Fig. 7C) and type I collagen (n = 5, Fig. 7D). TGF-β1 significantly increased the expression of α-SMA and type I collagen (α-SMA; TGF-β: 146 ± 8% vs. Cont, P < 0.01, type I collagen; TGF-β: 194 ± 29% vs. Cont, P < 0.05). Recombinant mouse canstatin (250 ng/ml, 30 min pre-treatment) significantly prevented it (α-SMA; TGF-β + canstatin: 112 ± 9%, P < 0.01 vs. TGF-β, type I collagen; TGF-β + canstatin: 105 ± 27%, P < 0.05 vs. TGF-β).
Discussion
The present study for the first time demonstrated that recombinant mouse canstatin improved survival rate and suppressed adverse cardiac remodeling, such as LV dilatation, scar thinning in the infarcted area as well as cardiac hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis in the non-infarcted area after MI.
We previously examined the effects of canstatin (10–250 ng/ml) on hypoxia- or isoproterenol-induced apoptosis in H9c2 rat cardiomyoblasts and found that 250 ng/ml of canstatin significantly inhibited apoptosis11,17. According to the estimated blood volume/body weight (64 ml/kg), the injection of recombinant canstatin (20 μg/kg) may reach approximately 310 ng/ml as a blood concentration, which can exert cardioprotective effects. In addition, we previously demonstrated that the administration of recombinant canstatin (4, 20 and 40 μg/kg) to isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy model rats inhibited the increase of LV weight in a dose-dependent manner14. Although the minimum dose (4 μg/kg) of canstatin did not significantly inhibit the increase of LV weight, the middle dose (20 μg/kg) significantly inhibit it. From these observations, we used 20 μg/kg of canstatin in the present study.
In the present study, canstatin improved survival rate after MI. The protective effect of canstatin was observed within 9 days after MI (52.9% of rats in MI + vehicle group died within 7 days after MI and 27.3% of the rats in MI + canstatin group died within 9 days) (Fig. 1). In addition, canstatin significantly suppressed the increase of LVID and improved FS and EF within 7 days (Fig. 2). From these results, it was suggested that canstatin improved myocardium injury in the early phase of MI. We previously reported that canstatin inhibited hypoxia-induced apoptosis in H9c2 rat cardiomyoblasts11. Thus, we examined whether canstatin exerts cytoprotective effect against acute ischemic stress by an ex vivo MI model. A knockdown of canstatin protein achieved by injecting small interference RNA of type IV collagen α2 chain gene exaggerated an infarct size and apoptosis of cardiomyocytes after left anterior descending artery (LAD) ligation (Fig. S1). Therefore, it is assumed that canstatin might improve survival rate, LV dilatation and dysfunction in the early phase of MI perhaps in part through the inhibition of apoptosis of cardiomyocytes. Further studies are needed to clarify the importance of early phase treatment of canstatin in MI.
In the present study, canstatin significantly thickened the scar tissue after MI (Fig. 3). Scar tissue is mainly composed of collagens (type I and III), which are produced by myofibroblasts differentiated from cardiac fibroblasts3. An insufficiency of the population and activation of myofibroblasts in infarcted area leads to the formation of fragile scar tissue, which results in systolic dysfunction, adverse cardiac remodeling and cardiac rupture15. We previously demonstrated that canstatin promoted migration of cardiac fibroblasts and proliferation of myofibroblasts derived from the infarcted area after MI12,18. Therefore, it was suggested that canstatin might prevent scar thinning by promoting adequate scar formation via regulating the functions of cardiac fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in the infarcted area.
In the present study, canstatin inhibited cardiac hypertrophy in the non-infarcted area after MI (Fig. 4). We previously reported that recombinant mouse canstatin inhibited isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy through the suppression of intracellular Ca2+ rise and subsequent activation of calcineurin/nuclear translocation of NFATc414. We also demonstrated that canstatin suppressed L-type Ca2+ channel activity in rat cardiomyocytes19. Sanchez-Alonso et al. reported that the open probability of L-type Ca2+ channel on surface of cardiomyocytes in MI-induced heart failure model rats increased20. In addition, it has been reported that the phosphatase activity of calcineurin and the transcriptional activity of NFAT were increased in the heart tissue of MI model mice and rats, respectively21,22. The present study showed that canstatin inhibited the nuclear translocation of NFATc4 in cardiomyocytes of the non-infarcted area (Fig. 5). Calcineurin activated by intracellular Ca2+ rise induces dephosphorylation and nuclear translocation of NFATc4, which promotes transcription of hypertrophy-related genes16,23. Thus, canstatin might inhibit cardiac hypertrophy in the non-infarcted area perhaps in part through the suppression of Ca2+/calcineurin/NFATc4 pathway after MI. The limitation of this study was that we were not able to determine precise inhibitory mechanisms of canstatin on cardiac hypertrophy of the non-infarcted area in MI model. Canstatin might affect other hypertrophic pathways, such as activation of calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and increase of reactive oxygen species, which are induced by an intracellular Ca2+ rise24,25. Further studies are needed to clarify the detailed mechanisms of canstatin for the inhibition of cardiac hypertrophy after MI.
In the present study, canstatin inhibited the interstitial fibrosis in the non-infarcted area (Fig. 6). Interstitial fibrosis is an adverse cardiac remodeling since it increases stiffness of myocardium which leads to cardiac dysfunction9. TGF-β synthesized and secreted after MI is a major cause for developing interstitial fibrosis in the non-infarcted area9. Mechanical stress in the non-infarcted area activates latent TGF-β, which promotes differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts9. In the present study, the number of α-SMA-positive myofibroblasts was decreased by canstatin in the non-infarcted area. Thus, it was suggested that canstatin might inhibit interstitial fibrosis in the non-infarcted area through the inhibition of differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts. In the present study, canstatin significantly inhibited TGF-β1-induced α-SMA expression in cultured cardiac fibroblasts (Fig. 7). αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins are thought to be functional receptors for canstatin11,26. It has been reported that cilengitide, an inhibitor of αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins, attenuated TGF-β1-induced differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts27. In addition, latent TGF-β1 was activated via αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins in response to mechanical stretch of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts28,29. We previously demonstrated that canstatin inhibited collagen gel contraction by cardiac myofibroblasts12. Therefore, canstatin might inhibit TGF-β1-induced differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts by regulating αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins and/or cellular contraction. Further study is needed to clarify the detailed inhibitory mechanism of canstatin in differentiation of fibroblasts.
Canstatin is known to be a potent anti-angiogenic factor10. Thus, we examined whether canstatin affects angiogenesis by immunohistochemical staining against antibody to CD31, an endothelial cell marker. We found that canstatin had no effect on the number of CD31-positive capillary vessels in non-infarcted area (Fig. S2), suggesting that canstatin had no effect on angiogenesis after MI. It has been reported that recombinant canstatin-treatment in the range of 3–10 mg/kg exerted anti-tumor effects through the inhibition of angiogenesis in tumor model mice10,30. Thus, canstatin at the lower concentration (20 μg/kg) used in this study might have no effect on angiogenesis. Inflammation in non-infarcted area after MI is involved in LV remodeling31. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6, an inflammatory cytokine, were upregulated in non-infarcted area after MI32. In the present study, we found that canstatin had no significant effects on the increase in mRNA expression of TNF-α and IL-6 mediated by MI (Data not shown, SHAM + vehicle and SHAM + canstatin: n = 6; MI + vehicle and MI + canstatin: n = 8). Therefore, the cardioprotective effect of canstatin might not be due to the inhibition of inflammation.
In conclusion, our study for the first time demonstrated that canstatin is a novel endogenous peptide, which prevents adverse cardiac remodeling after MI. MI remains the most common cause of heart failure throughout the world1,2. The present study thus provides an insight into the development of a novel therapeutic strategy to improve prognosis of MI-induced dysfunction leading to heart failure.
Methods
Reagent and antibodies
Reagents sources were as follows: recombinant mouse canstatin (produced by Escherichia coli as described previously)14 and TGF-β1 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, U.S.A).
Antibody sources were as follows: anti-NFATc4 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, U.S.A.), anti-type I collagen antibody (Rockland Immunochemicals, Gilbertsville, PA, U.S.A), anti-α-SMA antibody (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), anti-β-tubulin antibody (Wako, Osaka, Japan), anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase linked whole antibody and anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase linked whole antibody (Cell signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, U.S.A.).
MI model
All animal experiments were approved by the President of Kitasato University through the judgment by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kitasato University (Approval No. 17-082, 18-019, 19-126). Male Wistar rats (CLEA Japan, Tokyo, Japan) were cared in accordance with the guideline for animal care and treatment of the Kitasato University. MI was induced by ligating coronary artery of rats (7–8-week-old) as described previously12,13. Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (induction: 5%, maintenance: 2.5%) and ventilated (respiratory rate: 100 times/min, tidal volume: 5 ml) through an intubation tube. Buprenorphine (0.005 mg/100 g) was subcutaneously administered for an analgesia. After left thoracotomy was performed, LAD was permanently ligated using a 6–0 nylon suture and the chest was closed. LAD ligation was not performed in SHAM-operated rats. Recombinant mouse canstatin (20 μg/kg) or its vehicle (0.8 mM Tris, 20 mM L-Arginine, 4% glycerol in saline) was intraperitoneally administered for 28 days from the day of operation. Twenty eight days after the operation, the heart was isolated and perfused with Krebs–Henseleit solution (119 mM NaCl, 4.8 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 24.9 mM NaHCO3, 10.0 mM glucose). A part of isolated ventricular tissue of the heart was separated into infarcted area and non-infarcted area, which were immediately frozen with liquid nitrogen and preserved at – 80 °C for Western blotting. Remaining ventricular tissue of the heart was cut transversely and fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin for histological analysis.
Echocardiography
Echocardiography was performed at 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after MI by using SonoScape X5V (SonoScape Medical Corp., Shenzhen, China) as described previously14,33. The rats were anesthetized with 2–3% isoflurane and properly positioned. M-mode images at longitudinal axis between papillary muscles were obtained from a parasternal short axis view of LV. LVIDd, LVIDs, FS and EF were measured from the images.
HE staining
HE staining was performed to measure the cell size of cardiomyocytes as described previously34. LV tissues fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin were embedded in paraffin and sectioned (4 μm). The deparaffinized sections were incubated with hematoxylin for 5 min. Following a rinse with distilled water, the sections were stained with eosin for 30 min. The images were obtained using a light microscope (BX-51; OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a microscope digital camera (DP74; OLYMPUS). The diameter of 50 cardiomyocytes in non-infarcted area of left ventricle was measured by cellSens Imaging Software (OLYMPUS) in each rat.
Picrosirius red staining
Picrosirius red staining was performed to evaluate scar formation in the infarcted area and fibrosis of the non-infarcted area as described previously34. LV tissues fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin were embedded in paraffin and sectioned (4 μm). The deparaffinized sections were stained with iron hematoxylin solution for 8 min and stained with picrosirius red solution for 60 min. The images were obtained using a light microscope (BX-51) equipped with a microscope digital camera (DP74). Scar thickness was measured by cellSens Imaging Software (OLYMPUS) in the randomly selected fifteen points of the scar tissue. The fibrosis of non-infarcted area in left ventricle was measured by Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) in three high power fields, and fibrotic area (in %) (picrosirius red stained area/total area) was calculated.
Immunohistochemical staining
Immunohistochemical staining was performed to evaluate nuclear translocation of NFATc4 as described previously14. LV tissues fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin were embedded in paraffin and sectioned (4 μm). The deparaffinized sections were heated with a microwave for antigen retrieval in Tris-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) buffer (pH 9.0). The sections were incubated in methanol with 0.3% H2O2 for 20 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity, and then incubated with anti-NFATc4 antibody (1:100 dilution) at 4 °C overnight. After washing, the sections were incubated in biotinylated link (Dako) for 60 min and next in streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase (Dako) for 30 min at room temperature. Then, antigen–antibody reaction was visualized by a liquid DAB + substrate chromogen system (Dako). The nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. The images were obtained using a light microscope (BX-51) equipped with a microscope digital camera (DP74). The NFATc4 positive nuclei were counted in three high power fields, and NFATc4-positive nuclei/total nuclei was calculated.
Isolation and culture of cardiac fibroblasts
Cardiac fibroblasts were isolated from the ventricle of male Wistar rats (4–5-week-old) and cultured as described previously35. The isolated heart was perfused with 0.02% collagenase (Wako) by a Langendorff apparatus. Then, the ventricle was minced and suspended in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Wako). After centrifugation, the suspended cells were dispersed in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.) and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic mixed solution (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) on 2% gelatin-coated culture dish and incubated for 90 min at 37 °C in 5% CO2. After incubation, the floating cells were removed and the adhered cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic mixed solution. The cells (passage 1–2) were starved for 24 h in DMEM before treatment. Differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts was induced by a stimulation of human recombinant TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) for 48 h. Recombinant canstatin was treated 30 min before the TGF-β1 stimulation.
Western blotting
Western blotting was performed as described previously14. The isolated LV tissues of non-infarcted were homogenized with Cell destroyer (Bio Medical Science Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and total protein of the tissues was extracted by RIPA lysis buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, NaCl 150 mM, MgCl2 10 mM, 1% TritonX-100, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) containing 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque). Total protein of cardiac fibroblasts was extracted by cell lysis buffer (Cell signaling Technology) containing 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque). Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed to separate equal amounts of proteins (LV tissue lysate: 20 μg, cell lysate: 1 or 10 μg), and the proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.). The membranes were incubated in 0.5% skim milk for blocking non-specific binding of antibody to antigen. After overnight incubation with the primary antibody at 4 °C, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibody. The chemiluminescent signal was detected by EZ-ECL detecting reagents (Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit, Haemek, Israel) using an ATTO light capture system (AE-6972; ATTO, Tokyo, Japan). The images of chemiluminescent signals were analyzed with a CS Analyzer 3.0 software (ATTO).
Statistical analysis
The results were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.). In two-group comparison, statistical analyses were performed by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (Fig. 3B). In multi-group comparison, statistical analyses were performed by one-way (Fig. 7C–D) or two-way (Figs. 2B–E, 4B, 5B, 6B, C, 7B) ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. In the survival study, statistical analysis was performed by log-rank test (Fig. 1). A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Japan society for the Promotion of Science Research Fellow Grant (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 18J20623) and Kitasato University Research Grant for Young Researchers.
Author contributions
A.S.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation, Writing-original draft, Funding acquisition. R.I.: Investigation, Data curation. M.O.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing–review & editing, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. H.Y.: Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Writing-review & editing, Supervision, Project administration.
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-69736-y.
References
- 1.Finegold JA, Asaria P, Francis DP. Mortality from ischaemic heart disease by country, region, and age: statistics from World Health Organisation and United Nations. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013;168:934–945. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e56–e66. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ma Y, Brás LEDC, Toba H, Iyer RP, Lindsey ML. Myofibroblasts and the extracellular matrix network in post-myocardial infarction cardiac remodeling. Pflugers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2014;466:1113–1127. doi: 10.1007/s00424-014-1463-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Seropian IM, Toldo S, Van Tassell BW, Abbate A. Anti-inflammatory strategies for ventricular remodeling following St-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014;63:1593–1603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shinde AV, Frangogiannis NG. Fibroblasts in myocardial infarction: a role in inflammation and repair. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2014;70:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.van den Borne SW, Diez J, Blankesteijn WM, Verjans J, Hofstra L, Narula J. Myocardial remodeling after infarction: the role of myofibroblasts. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2009;7:30–37. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Caulfield JB, Leinbach R, Gold H. The relationship of myocardial infarct size and prognosis. Circulation. 1976;53(3 Suppl):I141–I144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sutton MG, Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction pathophysiology and therapy. Circulation. 2000;101:2981–2988. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.25.2981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Talman V, Ruskoaho H. Cardiac fibrosis in myocardial infarction-from repair and remodeling to regeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;365:568–581. doi: 10.1007/s00441-016-2431-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kamphaus GD, et al. Canstatin, a novel matrix-derived inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:1209–1215. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.2.1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kanazawa H, Imoto K, Okada M, Yamawaki H. Canstatin inhibits hypoxia-induced apoptosis through activation of integrin/focal adhesion kinase/Akt signaling pathway in H9c2 cardiomyoblasts. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0173051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sugiyama A, Okada M, Yamawaki H. Pathophysiological roles of canstatin on myofibroblasts after myocardial infarction in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017;807:32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sugiyama A, Mitsui A, Okada M, Yamawaki H. Cathepsin S degrades arresten and canstatin in infarcted area after myocardial infarction in rats. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2019;81:522–531. doi: 10.1292/jvms.18-0674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sugiyama A, Okada M, Yamawaki H. Canstatin suppresses isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy through inhibition of calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T-cells pathway in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020;871:172849. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Turner NA, Porter KE. Function and fate of myofibroblasts after myocardial infarction. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2013;6:5. doi: 10.1186/1755-1536-6-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wilkins BJ, Molkentin JD. Calcium-calcineurin signaling in the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;322:1178–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.07.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Okada M, Morioka S, Kanazawa H, Yamawaki H. Canstatin inhibits isoproterenol-induced apoptosis through preserving mitochondrial morphology in differentiated H9c2 cardiomyoblasts. Apoptosis. 2016;21:887–895. doi: 10.1007/s10495-016-1262-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Okada M, Murata N, Yamawaki H. Canstatin stimulates migration of rat cardiac fibroblasts via secretion of matrix metalloproteinase-2. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2017;312:C199–C208. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00329.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Imoto K, Hirakawa M, Okada M, Yamawaki H. Canstatin modulates L-type calcium channel activity in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;499:954–959. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sanchez-Alonso JL, et al. Microdomain-specific modulation of L-type calcium channels leads to triggered ventricular arrhythmia in heart failure. Circ. Res. 2016;119:944–955. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nieves-Cintrón M, et al. AKAP150 participates in calcineurin/NFAT activation during the down-regulation of voltage-gated K+ currents in ventricular myocytes following myocardial infarction. Cell. Signal. 2016;28:733–740. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wilkins BJ, et al. Calcineurin/NFAT coupling participates in pathological, but not physiological, cardiac hypertrophy. Circ. Res. 2004;94:110–118. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000109415.17511.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Molkentin JD. Calcineurin-NFAT signaling regulates the cardiac hypertrophic response in coordination with the MAPKs. Cardiovasc. Res. 2004;63:467–475. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang P. CaMKII: The molecular villain that aggravates cardiovascular disease (Review) Exp. Ther. Med. 2017;13:815–820. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Karmazyn M, Kilić A, Javadov S. The role of NHE-1 in myocardial hypertrophy and remodelling. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2008;44:647–653. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Magnon C, et al. Canstatin acts on endothelial and tumor cells via mitochondrial damage initiated through interaction with ανβ3 and ανβ5 integrins. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4353–4361. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Perrucci GL, et al. Integrin ανβ5 in vitro inhibition limits pro-fibrotic response in cardiac fibroblasts of spontaneously hypertensive rats. J. Transl. Med. 2018;16:352. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1730-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wipff PJ, Hinz B. Integrins and the activation of latent transforming growth factor β1—an intimate relationship. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2008;87:601–615. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sarrazy V, et al. Integrins ανβ5 and ανβ3 promote latent TGF-β1 activation by human cardiac fibroblast contraction. Cardiovasc. Res. 2014;102:407–417. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvu053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.He XP, et al. Effects of recombinant human canstatin protein in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006;12:6652–6657. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i41.6652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ong SB, et al. Inflammation following acute myocardial infarction: Multiple players, dynamic roles, and novel therapeutic opportunities. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018;186:73–87. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu L, et al. Up-regulated TLR4 in cardiomyocytes exacerbates heart failure after long-term myocardial infarction. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2015;19:2728–2740. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sugiyama A, Hirano Y, Okada M, Yamawaki H. Endostatin stimulates proliferation and migration of myofibroblasts isolated from myocardial infarction model rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:741. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Otani K, et al. Plasma exosomes regulate systemic blood pressure in rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;503:776–783. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yasuda J, Fukui K, Okada M, Yamawaki H. T3 peptide, a fragment of tumstatin, stimulates proliferation and migration of cardiac fibroblasts through activation of Akt signaling pathway. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2017;390:1135–1144. doi: 10.1007/s00210-017-1413-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.