Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2020 Jul 23;952:65–93. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.952.52695

Taxonomic note on Trichelix horrida (Pfeiffer, 1863) from Laos, with a type catalogue of Moellendorffia, Trichelix, and Moellendorffiella (Heterobranchia, Camaenidae)

Chirasak Sutcharit 1, Khamla Inkhavilay 2, Somsak Panha 1,✉
PMCID: PMC7394776  PMID: 32774112

Abstract

Land snail surveys conducted in northern Laos between 2013 and 2014 have led to the discovery of a living population of Trichelix horrida (Pfeiffer, 1863). This species has never been recorded from specimens other than the types, and its distribution and anatomy have remained essentially unknown. The genitalia and radula morphology are documented here for the first time and employed to re-assess the systematic position of this species: the unique morphological characters of T. horrida are a penis similar in length to the vagina, a small and triangular penial verge, gametolytic organs extending as far as the albumen gland, head wart present, and unicuspid triangular radula teeth. The type locality of this species was believed to be from “Lao Mountains, Camboja,” and is restricted herein to be Luang Phrabang Province, northern Laos. The assignment of species to either of three genera, Trichelix Ancey, 1887, Moellendorffia Ancey, 1887, and Moellendorffiella Pilsbry, 1905, based solely on information provided in their original descriptions is difficult. The type specimens of all nominal species presently placed in either of these three genera are examined and illustrated herein. Comparison with the primary type specimens will assist future revisions aiming to resolve the systematics of these taxa. In addition, we transfer Moellendorffia faberiana (Möllendorff, 1888) to the genus Moellendorffiella.

Keywords: Biodiversity, Indochina, Japan, land snail, limestone, systematics, type specimen

Introduction

The land snail genus Trichelix Ancey, 1887 has a wide distribution from southeastern China to the northern parts of Laos and Vietnam, Taiwan, and the central Ryukyu Islands of Japan (Schileyko 2003). Originally, Trichelix was described as a monotypic genus for the type species Helix horrida Pfeiffer, 1863. The flattened to sunken spire, elevated parietal callus, aperture with denticles, external furrows on the outer wall of the last whorl, and the hirsute shell microsculpture confer a very distinctive morphology to the shell of this species (Ancey 1887; Pilsbry 1890, 1895, 1901, 1905; Yen 1939; Zilch 1960). The early taxonomic work was restricted to the description of shell morphology, and Pilsbry (1905) treated Trichelix as a subgenus of Moellendorffia Ancey, 1887 due to a similar shell and apertural morphology. Five additional species have since been assigned to this taxon (Pilsbry 1905). Subsequently, Habe (1957), Minato (1971, 1980, 2011), and Azuma (1982) described the genital anatomy of the species from the eastern Asian islands. Schileyko (2003) revised the genus based on published information about species other than the type species. Schileyko (2003) found differences in the genital anatomy of species, which may be indicative of a distinct lineages, but he hesitated to propose this conclusion because the anatomy of the type species was still unknown. Later, examination of the genital anatomy and shell morphology of Moellendorffia eastlakeana (Möllendorff, 1882) from Vietnam has suggested a possibly close relationship between Moellendorffia and Trichelix (Panha et al. 2010). Recently, Minato (2011) reviewed the genus and followed Pilsbry’s (1905) classification by recognizing Trichelix as a subgenus; Minato (2011) examined the genital anatomy of Taiwanese species. These reports appear to be the only published literature on the systematics of Trichelix.

Helix horrida Pfeiffer, 1863 was established based on three specimens from the collection of H. Cuming, and these syntypes were collected by H. Mouhot. The type locality was stated to be “Lao Mountains, Camboja,” without any other precise locality information. Localities recorded by Mouhot were usually tentative and based on a broad geographical scale. This has rendered it difficult to infer the type localities of many species that were described based on material collected by Mouhot, including fish (Kottelat and Tan 2018), reptiles and amphibians (Stuart et al. 2006), and land snails (Sutcharit et al. 2019). Similarly, the type locality of Helix horrida Pfeiffer, 1863 is rather vague, and with no later records of this species available. The distribution of this species has remained essentially unknown to this day. The field surveys performed during 2013 and 2014 in the northern part of Laos contained a records of Helix horrida Pfeiffer, 1863 and comparisons with the type material confirm its identity.

Here, we report on the examination of examples of T. horrida (Pfeiffer, 1863) collected from northern Laos. The type locality is discussed, and a correction is proposed in accordance with the guidelines of ICZN (1999). In addition, the primary type specimens of all recognized taxa belonging to the genera Moellendorffia, Trichelix, and Moellendorffiella Pilsbry, 1905 are included for comparisons and because the species identification could not have been possible without comparison with the type specimens.

Materials and methods

Shells and living specimens were collected in a limestone forest in Luang Phrabang Province, northern Laos. The live specimens were photographed, euthanized (AVMA 2013), and then transferred to 70% (v/v) ethanol for fixation and preservation. The genitalia of three specimens were dissected and examined under a stereomicroscope. Drawings were made with a camera lucida. Radulae were extracted, soaked in 10% (w/v) NaOH, and then examined under scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JEOL, JSM-6610 LV). The formulae and morphology of radula were observed, recorded, and described. Adult shells were used to measure the shell height and shell width, and to count the number of whorls. The voucher specimens are now deposited in the Chulalongkorn University Museum of Zoology (CUMZ) and in the collection at the National University of Laos.

Anatomical conventions and abbreviations: In the descriptions of the genitalia, the following abbreviations are used, as defined by Habe (1957), Schileyko (2003), and Panha et al. (2010). The term ‘proximal’ refers to the region closest to the genital orifice, while ‘distal’ refers to the region furthest away from the genital orifice. Abbreviations: ag, albumen gland; at, atrium; e, epiphallus; fl, flagellum; fo, free oviduct; gd, gametolytic duct; gs, gametolytic sac; hd, hermaphroditic duct; hw, head wart; ov, oviduct; p, penis; pp, penial pilaster; pr, penial retractor muscle; pv, penial verge; v, vagina; vd, vas deferens; vp, vaginal pilaster.

Institutional abbreviations

ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia

MCZ Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge

MNHN Muséum National ďHistoire Naturelle, Paris

NHM Natural History Museum, London

NHMW Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna

NIGPAS Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing

SMF Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg, Frankfurt am Main

ZMB Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin

ZMNH AIMS Zhejiang Museum of Natural History, Hangzhou

Photo credits

Photos of the type specimens from the Molluscs Collection (IM) of MNHN are credited to the museum taken under the project E-RECOLNAT: ANR-11-INBS-0004 and MNHN/Philippe Maestrati, or as otherwise stated.

Systematics

Family Camaenidae

Genus. Trichelix

Ancey, 1887

693D028C-C37E-57D9-8967-90CBCA0F24F7

Type species.

Helix horrida Pfeiffer, 1863; by original designation.

Description.

Shell small to medium-sized, flattened to concave, rather thin, umbilicate, and corneous to brownish. Spire shrunken; embryonic shell nearly smooth; following whorls granulated and with short to long periostracal hairs arranged in oblique rows along the lines of growth. Last whorl rounded and descending anteriorly. Aperture ventral or subvertical; trigonal or subcircular; with strong or weak barriers inside the aperture at upper periphery and below periphery, and externally marked with strong to weak longitudinal furrows. Peristome expanded and continuous or discontinuous; parietal callus thin or thickened and little elevated.

Genitalia typical of camaenids, without either dart apparatus or accessory glands. Penis and epiphallus long, penial verge present, and flagellum short. Internal wall of penis and vagina with longitudinal pilasters.

Radular teeth arranged in V-shaped rows; central and lateral teeth triangular.

Remarks.

The genus is currently comprised of six nominal species (Schileyko 2003; Minato 2011). Two species occur in northern Laos and southern China (Fig. 3), viz. T. horrida and T. biscalpta (Heude, 1885), and one has been recorded from Taiwan, viz. T. hiraseana (Pilsbry, 1905). Three species occur on the Amami Islands, Central Ryukyu Islands, Japan, viz. T. eucharista (Pilsbry, 1901), T. diminuta (Pilsbry & Hirase, 1905) and T. tokunoensis (Pilsbry & Hirase, 1905).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Approximate geographical position of the type locality of all nominal species of the genera Moellendorffia (circle), Trichelix (square), and Moellendorffiella (triangle). The numbers indicated correspond to the nominal species listed in the catalogue of the type specimen.

Trichelix horrida

(Pfeiffer, 1863)

1022CAD3-022A-5EDA-841B-929249734061

Figures 1 , 2 , 7B

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Living snail and shell A specimen CUMZ 5248 B specimen CUMZ 5249.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Genitalia and radula of T. horrida specimen CUMZ 5248 A General view of the genital system B Interior structure of the penis and vaginal chambers C Dorsal view showing head wart D Scanning electron micrographs of central, lateral and marginal teeth. Central tooth is indicated by ‘C’ and the other numbers indicate the order of lateral and marginal teeth.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Open in a new tab

ATrichelix hiraseana, lectotype ANSP 89999 BTrichelix horrida, lectotype NHMUK 20200202/1 CTrichelix eucharista, syntype NHMUK 19991540 of Chloritis malangensisDTrichelix oshimana, syntype NHMUK 1922.8.29.83 E, FTrichelix tokunoensisE lectotype ANSP 87680 and F paralectotype ANSP 90048.

Type material.

Three specimens originating from H. Cuming’s collection with the original label stating the taxon name and collection location in Pfeiffer’s handwriting are present in the malacological collection of the NHMUK. Of these specimens, the one most closely matching the measurements given in the original description is here designated as the lectotype NHMUK 20200202/1 (Fig. 7B) to stabilize the name. The other two shells from the same lot become paralectotypes NHMUK 20200202/2 to 20200202/3.

Trichelix horrida was originally described based on specimens collected by H. Mouhot, with “Lao Mountain, Camboja” as the published type locality. Our survey following Mouhot’s itinerary in the south-western part of Cambodia yielded no specimens that could be identified in this genus. This record type locality seems to be imprecise. On the other hand, our survey in the northern part of Laos, where Mouhot had visited Luang Phrabang in 1861, recorded populations of this species in Muang Ngoi about 90 km north of Luang Phrabang City. Therefore, we restricted the known distribution and propose Luang Phrabang Province, Laos as the correct type locality for this species.

Material examined.

Moist evergreen forest on limestone hills between Ban Pha Toke and Ban Nong Ian, Muang Ngoi (Town), Ngoi District, Luang Phrabang Province, Laos (20°32'31.2"N, 102°38'56.3"E): CUMZ 5248 (eight specimens in ethanol; Fig. 1A), CUMZ 5249 (five shells; Fig. 1B), CUMZ 5250 (one shell).

Measurement.

From 10 specimens analyzed; shell height ranged from 12.4–14.7 mm (mean 13.5 ± 1.0); shell width ranged from 20.8–23.9 mm (mean 22.0 ± 1.2); and whorl count ranged from 6–6⅛ whorls.

Shell.

Shell medium-sized, dextral, slightly thin, translucent, depressed globose, biconcave shaped (dorsoventrally concave), and deeply umbilicate. Whorls 5–6, slightly convex, and increasing regularly; suture depressed, spire concave, looking like umbilicus. Embryonic shell large with very fine growth lines. Following whorl with corneous to brownish periostracum; upper surface with long hairs arranged in oblique rows; lower surface with slightly shorter hairs and few hairs around umbilicus. In worn specimens, shell surface possesses rough rows of tubercles running obliquely and descending, relatively smooth around umbilicus. Last whorl well rounded and little convex below periphery. Last whorl descending about ¼ whorl from aperture, and constriction occurs close to apertural lip. Aperture ear-shaped and opened subventrally; lip margin pale corneous, little thickened, and continuously expanded. External furrow aligns with internal apertural lamella or fold. Upper periphery marked with two furrows arranged spirally and correspond with palatal lamella and fold; below periphery with one furrow close to lip aligned with basal lamella. Parietal callus thickened, elevated, emarginated, and obtusely projecting inward. Umbilicus wide, but narrower than apex side which is cascade-shouldered.

Genitalia.

Atrium (at) short; penis (p) long; proximally with penial verge and enlarged fold at penial verge base; distally similar in length as proximally and somewhat slender tube. Epiphallus (e) slightly enlarged and almost the same length as penis. Flagellum (fl) very short and small. Vas deferens (vd) a small tube, follows vagina and penis, and connects distally on epiphallus and free oviduct. Penial retractor muscle (pr) slightly thickened and long (Fig. 2A).

Internal wall of penis ribbed by a series of swollen longitudinal penial pilasters (pp). Smooth pilasters line introverts penial chamber and encircles penial verge tip. Penial verge (pv) small, short conic with smooth surface (Fig. 2B).

Vagina (v) of similar length to proximal penis and held in position by series of muscles attached to foot floor. Gametolytic organ (duct and sac) long, cylindrical, and extending as far as albumen gland. Gametolytic duct (gd) as wide as gametolytic sac (gs) for most of its length but narrows before reaching gametolytic sac. Free oviduct (fo) short, about half of vagina length; oviduct (ov) small. Prostate gland (pg) and oviduct (ov) developed; hermaphroditic duct long and convoluted tube; albumen gland solid and tongue shape (Fig. 2A).

Internal wall of vagina possesses several longitudinal vaginal pilasters (vp). Pilasters with smooth surface and line entire vaginal chamber (Fig. 2B).

Animal.

Live animal covered with blackish-brown reticulated skin and dorsally with whitish stripe in middle of the body. A small curved head wart (hw) is located between the posterior tentacles (Fig. 2C). Foot narrow and long; mantle edge greyish; tentacles brownish, and lower tentacles pale brown. Mantle cavity possesses blackish pigmentation. Live snails possess short to long periostracal hairs, which mostly disappear in worn shells or old snails.

Radula.

Teeth arranged in anteriorly pointed, V-shaped rows; each row contains about 75 (37-(18–20)-1-(18–20)-38) teeth. Central tooth unicuspid, triangular with blunt cusp. Lateral teeth unicuspid, triangular with blunt tip, gradually taller laterally and little inclined to central tooth. Marginal teeth starting around tooth numbers 18 to 20 outwards from lateral teeth. Tricuspid or bicuspid marginal teeth, endocone usually absent; mesocone large, broad and with curved to blunt cusp; ectocone slightly large, pointed head and located at base of the teeth. Outer marginal teeth rather small; mesocone and ectocone indistinguishable, with undulated cusp (Fig. 2D).

Distribution.

Trichelix horrida was previously known only from the type locality (“Lao Mountain, Cambojia” [Cambodia or Laos]). The specimens examined herein were collected from limestone karst in Muang Ngoi Town, about 90 km north of Luang Phrabang City.

Our sampling locality was characterized by monsoonal karst landforms with high humidity. The snails occurred in tropical moist deciduous forest. There was heavy rain before our visit in August 2014. The snails were active, crawling or sitting on moist rotten logs among the limestone outcrops.

Remarks.

Trichelix horrida is distinctly different in shell morphology from all other Moellendorffia species by having a concave spire, rounded last whorl, and two furrows arranged spirally on the upper periphery (Table 1). In contrast, Moellendorffia species tend to have flattened to elevated spires, rounded to shouldered last whorls, and two furrows arranged vertically on the periphery. Trichelix horrida differs from the other congeners in having two short furrows on the last whorl and an elevated parietal callus (Fig. 7B), while T. biscalpta and T. hiraseana tend to have a long furrow on the last whorl and unelevated parietal callus (Figs 6C, 7A). In addition, T. hiraseana has a relatively long, drumstick-shaped flagellum, while the type species has a very short protrusion (see Minato 2011 for a comparison). In addition, Chloritis bifoveata (Benson, 1850) from Myanmar and Thailand, C. diplochone Möllendorff, 1898 from Laos and Thailand, and C. vinhensis Thach & Huber, 2018 from Vietnam differ from T. horrida by having a thin parietal callus, with a shell constriction occurring about half a whorl from the aperture (absent in C. vinhensis), and without apertural dentition (Sutcharit and Panha 2010; Páll-Gergely and Neubert 2019; Páll-Gergely et al. 2020).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

AMoellendorffia spurca, syntype MNHN-IM-2000-1992 BMoellendorffia trisinuata, syntype ZMB 7620 CTrichelix biscalpta, syntype MCZ 167125 DTrichelix diminuta, lectotype ANSP 90049 ETrichelix eucharista, lectotype ANSP 81221 FTrichelix hiraseana, lectotype SMF 7404/1 of Stegodera helleri. Photo: AJ Baldinger (C).

Table 1.

Comparison of Trichelix (continental and eastern Asian islands species) and the related genera Moellendorffia and Moellendorffiella.

Characters Moellendorffia Ancey, 1887 Trichelix Ancey, 1887 Moellendorffiella Pilsbry, 1905
Continental group Central Ryukyu group
Shell shape low conic to convex concave concave flat
Last whorl round or angular round round shouldered or strong shouldered keel
Periostracal hair short to long short to long short absent
Furrow on upper periphery and alignment on last whorl – one or two / spiral alignment – –
Furrow on periphery and alignment on last whorl two / vertical alignment – – one/ spiral alignment
Furrow below periphery one and strong one and strong absent or very weak one and strong
Parietal callus long elevated with nodule short elevated with nodule thin with cords thin
Distribution (Fig. 3) Southern China and Indochina Central China, Indochina and Taiwan Restricted to the Central Ryukyu Islands, Japan Central China
Suggested nominal species
(bold = type species)		 blaisei, deflexa, dengi, depressispira, eastlakeana, hensaniensis, loxotata, messageri, sculpticoncha, spurca, trisinuata biscalpta, hiraseana, horrida diminuta, eucharista, tokunoensis erdmanni, faberiana
Open in a new tab

Discussion

The newly collected material from Laos presents valuable additional information for the taxonomic position of Trichelix and its congeners. The relationship of Trichelix with Moellendorffia and Moellendorffiella has been suggested based on shell and genital anatomy characters (Panha et al. 2010). The shrunken spire and one or two furrows located on the upper periphery are the unique characteristics of Trichelix. At present, Trichelix s.l. has a wide distribution across Indochina to Taiwan, southern China, and the Central Ryukyu Islands of Japan (Fig. 3).

The genus Trichelix s.l. appears to be a heteromorphic assemblage, as noted by Schileyko (2003), based on both shell and genital anatomy characters. The genus comprises the continental group and the Central Ryukyu group. The continental group includes three nominal species from northern Laos (the type species), Taiwan (T. hiraseana), and southern China (T. biscalpta). They all have prominent palatal lamellae arranged spirally on upper periphery, strong columellar lamella, and vagina almost the same length as penis. The Central Ryukyu group contains three nominal species: T. eucharista, T. tokunoensis, and T. diminuta; they lack the parietal lamella and have a very weak or absent columellar lamella, and the vagina is relatively longer than the penis (Habe 1957; Minato 1971, 1980, 2011; Schileyko 2003). The unique genital characters of T. eucharista are: penis about half of vagina length and vagina with constrictions; T. tokunoensis possesses two penial retractor muscles, a very small epiphallus and penis about one-third of the vagina length; T. diminuta has the penis about half of the vagina length and the gametolytic duct bears constrictions (Habe 1957; Minato 1971, 1980, 2011; Schileyko 2003). These unique and distinct genital characters are likely to be apomorphic traits and would be the main reproductive barrier among these species. It is very likely that the three species inhabiting the Central Ryukyu Islands of Japan do not belong to the same genus as the continental and Taiwanese species. However, with so few synapomorphic traits among these Central Ryukyu Islands species, the confidence in defining distinct lineages remains low. Therefore, we refrain from describing a genus without additional evidence from molecular analyses.

Catalogue of type specimens of Moellendorffia, Trichelix, and Moellendorffiella

In the following catalogue list, the primary type specimens (i.e., holotype, lectotype, and syntype/s) along with secondary type specimens (paratype/s and paralectotype/s) of Moellendorffia, Trichelix, and Moellendorffiella species are provided. The species-group names are arranged by alphabetical order. The references for the usage of each taxon name have been comprehensively provided by Richardson (1985), Zilch (1966), and Minato (2011). The name in the original combination is given with the bibliographic information or the original description. The type locality is given, and if possible, the modern name and/or regional names of the type locality are provided in square brackets. The current taxonomic status includes the generic placement, whether a valid name or synonym. If necessary, remarks are given on the status of type specimens, authorships, availability of name, notes on the type locality, and other useful comments.

Alphabetical list of the taxa

I. Genus Moellendorffia Ancey, 1887

MoellendorffiaAncey 1887: 64. Zilch 1960: 611, 612. Schileyko 2003: 1514, 1515.

ProctostomaMabille 1887b: 102.

Moellendorffia (Moellendorffia): Pilsbry 1905: 65. Zilch 1960: 612. Zilch 1966: 210.

Type species.

Helix trisinuata Martens, 1867; by original designation.

Diagnosis.

Shell flattened to globose-conic, and umbilicate. Periostracum thick and covered with short to long hairs. Last whorl rounded to shoulder and descending anteriorly. Aperture trigonal or squarish, entirely free from preceding whorl; with barriers inside, and externally marked with furrows. Parietal wall elevated to form prominent nodule; one or two palatal lamellae (two lamellae arranged vertically); one columellar lamella.

Remarks.

The genus Moellendorffia can be distinguished from Trichelix s.l. in having low conical to elevated spire, one or two furrows (arranged vertically) on periphery and elevated parietal callus, while Trichelix s.l. has a concave spire. In addition, the continental-Trichelix have one or two furrows (arranged spirally) on the upper periphery and little elevated parietal callus, and the Central Ryukyu-Trichelix performs very weak or absent furrows, and a thin parietal callus.

1. blaisei Dautzenberg & Fischer, 1905

Moellendorffia blaiseiDautzenberg and Fischer 1905: 99, 100, pl. 3, figs 17–19. Type locality: Ile Krieu, Tonkin [Krieu Island, Ha Long Provincial, Quang Ninh Province, Vietnam]. Schileyko 2011: 43.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Syntype MNHN-IM-2000-1843 (one shell, Fig. 4A).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

AMoellendorffia blaisei, syntype MNHN-IM-2000-1843 BMoellendorffia callitricha, syntype MNHN-IM-2000-2006 CMoellendorffia spurca deflexa, lectotype SMF 27260a DMoellendorffia dengi, holotype ZMHN AIMS 1693 EMoellendorffia depressispira, syntype MNHN-IM-2000-34941 FMoellendorffia eastlakeana, lectotype SMF 8328/1. Photo: J He (D).

2. callitricha (Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1899)

Helix (Moellendorffia) callitrichaBavay and Dautzenberg 1899: 35, 36, pl. 1, fig. 6. Type locality: That-Khé [That Khe Town, Trang Dinh District, Lang Son Province, Vietnam].

Moellendorffia callitricha: Richardson 1985: 183.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Synonym of Moellendorffia eastlakeana (see Panha et al. 2010).

Type specimens.

Syntype MNHN-IM-2000-2006 (one shell, Fig. 4B).

3. deflexa Möllendorff, 1901

Moellendorffia spurca deflexaMöllendorff 1901: 74. Type locality: Masongebirge [Mau Son Mountains, Lang Son Province, Vietnam].

Moellendorffia (Moellendorffia) spurca deflexa: Zilch 1966: 210, pl. 6, fig. 54.

Moellendorffia spurca deflexa: Richardson 1985: 186. Schileyko 2011: 44.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia spurca. Accepted subspecies.

Type specimens.

Lectotype SMF 27260a (Fig. 4C) and paralectotype SMF 27260b (one shell) from Manson Gebirge, Tonkin.

Remarks.

The lectotype was designated in Zilch (1966: 210).

4. dengi Yang, Fan, Qiao & He, 2012

Moellendorffia dengiYang et al. 2012: 32, fig. 1. Type locality: Leye Country, Guangxi Province, China.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Holotype ZMHN AIMS 1693 (Fig. 4D) and paratypes unnumbered (three shells).

5. depressispira (Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1909)

Helix (Moellendorffia) depressispiraBavay and Dautzenberg 1909b: 244. Type locality: Pac-Kha [Pa Kha in Long Luong Commune, Van Ho District, Son La Province, Vietnam]. Bavay and Dautzenberg 1909a: 197, 198, pl. 8, figs 10–12.

Moellendorffia depressispira: Richardson 1985: 183. Schileyko 2011: 44.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Syntype MNHN-IM-2000-34941 (one shell, Fig. 4E).

6. eastlakeana (Möllendorff, 1882)

Helix eastlakeanaMöllendorff 1882: 185. Type locality: Guang-dung [Guangdong, China].

Moellendorffia (Moellendorffia) eastlakeana: Zilch 1966: 210, pl. 6, fig. 52.

Moellendorffia eastlakeana: Richardson 1985: 184. Panha et al. 2010: 21–24, figs 1–10. Schileyko 2011: 44.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Lectotype SMF 8328/1 (Fig. 4F) and paralectotype SMF 8329 (one juvenile) from Tai-mo-Shan, Guong-dong.

Remarks.

The lectotype was designated in Zilch (1966: 210).

7. exasperata (Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1909)

Helix (Moellendorffia) loxotata var. exasperataBavay and Dautzenberg 1909a: 196, pl. 8, figs 13, 14. Type locality: Nat-Son, Muong-Hum [probably in the area of Lao Cai Province, Vietnam].

Moellendorffia loxotata exasperata: Schileyko 2011: 44.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia loxotata. Accepted subspecies.

Type specimens.

Syntype MNHN-IM-2000-34940 (one shell, Fig. 5A).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

AMoellendorffia loxotata exasperata, syntype MNHN-IM-2000-34940 B, CMoellendorffia hensaniensisB lectotype NHMW 15795 and C paralectotype SMF 50076/1 DMoellendorffia loxotata, syntype MNHN-IM-2000-2071 EMoellendorffia messageri, syntype MNHN-IM-2000-1939 FMoellendorffia trisinuata sculpticoncha, lectotype SMF 8331/1. Photo: S Schnedl (B).

8. hensaniensis (Gredler, 1885)

Helix (Polygyra) hensaniensisGredler 1885: 4. Type locality: Heng-shan-hsien, Hunan, China. Gredler 1887: 283, pl. 11, figs 1–3.

Moellendorffia (Moellendorffia) hensaniensis: Zilch 1966: 210.

Moellendorffia hensaniensis: Zilch 1974: 194. Richardson 1985: 185.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Lectotype NHMW 15795 (Fig. 5B) and paralectotype SMF 50076/1 (one shell, Fig. 5C) from Hensan, China.

Remarks.

The lectotype was designated in Zilch (1974: 194) and illustrated for the first time in this study.

9. loxotata (Mabille, 1887)

Helix loxotataMabille 1887a: 5. Type locality: Tonkin.

Proctostoma loxotatum: Mabille 1887b: 102–104, pl. 1, figs 1–3.

Moellendorffia loxotata: Richardson 1985: 185.

Moellendorffia loxotata loxotata: Schileyko 2011: 44.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Syntype MNHN-IM-2000-2071 (one shell, Fig. 5D).

10. messageri (Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1899)

Helix (Moellendorffia) messageri Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1899: 33–35, pl. 1, fig. 5. Type locality: entre Lang-Son et That-Khé [That Khe Town, Trang Dinh District, Lang Son Province, Vietnam].

Moellendorffia messageri: Richardson 1985: 185, 186. Schileyko 2011: 44.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Syntype MNHN-IM-2000-1939 (one shell, Fig. 5E).

11. sculpticoncha (Zilch, 1951)

Helix (Polygyra) trisinuata var. sculptilisMöllendorff 1884: 310, 311, pl. 7, fig. 4 [non Bland 1858: 279]. Type locality: Lo-fou-shan, Guang-dung [Guangdong, China].

Moellendorffia trisinuata sculpticonchaZilch 1951: 86 [nomen novum for Helix (Polygyra) trisinuata var. sculptilis Möllendorff, 1884]. Zilch 1966: 211, pl. 6, fig. 53. Richardson 1985: 186.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia trisinuata sculpticoncha. Accepted subspecies (Zilch 1966).

Type specimens.

Lectotype SMF 8331/1 (Fig. 5F) and paralectotypes SMF 8332/3 (three shells), SMF 27142/4 (four shells) from Lo-fou-shan, Guang-dung, China.

Remarks.

The lectotype was designated in Zilch (1966: 211).

12. sculptilis Möllendorff, 1884

Remarks.

see under “sculpticoncha”.

13. spurca (Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1899)

Helix (Moellendorffia) spurcaBavay and Dautzenberg 1899: 31–33, pl. 1, fig. 4. Type locality: environ de Bac-Kau [Bac Quang, Than Uyen District, Lai Chau Province, Vietnam].

Moellendorffia spurca: Richardson 1985: 186.

Moellendorffia spurca spurca: Schileyko 2011: 44.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Syntype MNHN-IM-2000-1992 (one shell, Fig. 6A).

14. trisinuata (Martens, 1867)

Helix trisinuataMartens 1867: 50, 51. Type locality: Hongkong [Hong Kong].

Moellendorffia (Moellendorffia) trisinuata trisinuata: Zilch 1966: 210, 211.

Moellendorffia trisinuata: Richardson 1985: 186.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Syntype ZMB 7620 (one shell, Fig. 6B) from Hongkong.

II. Genus Trichelix Ancey, 1887

Type species.

Helix horrida Pfeiffer, 1863; by original designation.

Diagnosis.

Shell flattened to concave, spire shrunken and umbilicate. Periostracum covered with short hairs. Last whorl well rounded and descending anteriorly. Aperture subcircular, without barrier or with barriers inside, and externally marked with furrows. Parietal callus thin, with cord at margin or a little elevated to form nodule; two palatal lamellae arranged spirally; one columellar lamella.

Remarks.

The genus Trichelix s.l. can be distinguished from Moellendorffiella by having concave spire, and short to long periostracal hairs, while Moellendorffiella have flat spire and without periostracal hair. The Central Ryukyu-Trichelix have a thin parietal callus with cord and very weak furrows below the periphery, and the continental-Trichelix have an elevated parietal callus with a nodule, and there are one or two furrows (arranged spirally) on the upper periphery. In comparison, Moellendorffiella has a thin parietal callus and one furrow on periphery.

15. biscalpta (Heude, 1885)

Helix biscalptaHeude 1885: 113, pl. 29, fig. 10. Type locality: Tchen-k’eou [Chengkou, Chongqing, China].

Moellendorffia biscalpta: Richardson 1985: 183.

Moellendorffia (Trichelix) biscalpta: Minato 2011: 25, fig. 3h.

Current taxonomic status.

Trichelix. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Syntype MCZ 167125 (two shells, Fig. 6C).

Remarks.

The original description does not clearly state how many specimens were available to the author, and a unique name-bearing type was not explicitly designated. Heude’s (1885) original description included a single illustration and one set of shell measurements. Johnson (1973: 17) used the term “paratypes” for a lot of two shells from the MCZ collection, but this does not constitute a valid holotype designation (ICZN 1999: Articles 73.1.1 and 73.2 and Recommendation 73F). The MCZ museum registration book states “Cotype”; these are also considered to be syntypes.

16. diminuta (Pilsbry & Hirase, 1905)

Moellendorffia eucharistus diminutaPilsbry and Hirase 1905: 710. Type locality: Koniya, Oshima, Osumi [Koniya-Setouchi, Oshima District, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan].

Moellendorffia diminuta: Baker 1963: 245.

Moellendorffia eucharistus diminuta: Richardson 1985: 184.

Moellendorffia (Trichelix) diminuta: Minato 1971: 36–38, figs 2, 10–12. Minato 1980: 190, fig. 2. Minato 2011: 28, fig. 5c–f.

Current taxonomic status.

Trichelix. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Lectotype ANSP 90049 (Fig. 6D) and paralectotypes ANSP 452028 (three shells).

Remarks.

The lectotype was designated by Baker (1963: 245).

17. eucharista (Pilsbry, 1901)

Chloritis eucharistusPilsbry 1901: 347, 348. Type locality: Oshima [Oshima District, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan].

Moellendorffia (Trichelix) eucharistus: Habe 1957: 8, 9, pl. 1, figs 3–8. Minato 1971: 36, figs 1, 7–9. Minato 1980: 190, fig. 1. Minato 2011: 26, 28, figs 2a, b, 5a, b.

Moellendorffia eucharista: Richardson 1985: 184.

Trichelix eucharistis: Schileyko 2003: fig. 1950b, c. (incorrect subsequent spelling)

Current taxonomic status.

Trichelix. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Lectotype ANSP 81221 (one shell, Fig. 6E) from Oshima, Osumi.

Remark.

The lectotype was designated in Baker (1963: 245). In the original publication, the type locality was recorded as “Oshima” (=Island) which cannot be precisely located. The original label accompanying the lectotype states “Oshima, Osumi” (= historical name of Kagoshima). Habe (1957) examined the radula and genital anatomy based on a specimen from Amami Oshima, Kagoshima. Therefore, the type locality of this species is probably in the area of the Amami Islands, Kagoshima Prefecture.

18. helleri (Rolle, 1911)

Stegodera (Trichelix) helleriRolle 1911: 31, 32. Type locality: Toyenmongai auf Formosa [Dong-yuan-men-jie, Tainan City, Taiwan]. Zilch 1966: 211, pl. 6, fig. 57.

Moellendorffia hiraseana helleri: Richardson 1985: 185.

Current taxonomic status.

Trichelix. Synonym of Trichelix hiraseana (see Zilch 1966).

Type specimens.

Lectotype SMF 7404/1 (Fig. 6F) and paralectotypes SMF 156134/4 (four shells) from Toyenmongai, Formosa. Possible paralectotype NHMUK 20040594 (four shells).

Remarks.

Zilch (1966) assumed the SMF 7404 ex. H. Rolle as the holotype. However, there was no unique name-bearing type fixed in the original publication. Hwang (2014: 25) subsequently designated SMF 7404 as the lectotype.

19. hiraseana Pilsbry, 1905

Moellendorffia (Trichelix) hiraseanaPilsbry 1905: 66, 67, pl. 2, figs 4–6. Type locality: Hotawa, Taiwan. Zilch 1966: 211. Minato 2011: 25, figs 3g, 5h.

Moellendorffia hiraseana: Richardson 1985: 185.

Current taxonomic status.

Trichelix. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Lectotype ANSP 89999 (Fig. 7A).

Remarks.

Pilsbry (1905) clearly stated that there were two specimens in his lot. The lectotype was designated in Baker (1963: 245).

20. horrida (Pfeiffer, 1863)

Helix horridaPfeiffer 1863[“1862”]: 272, pl. 36, fig. 15. Type locality: Lao Mountain, Camboja [Cambodia or Laos].

Moellendorffia horrida: Richardson 1985: 285. Inkhavilay et al. 2019: 105, figs 53f, 54a, 58h.

Current taxonomic status.

Trichelix. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Lectotype NHMUK 20200202/1 ex. Cuming coll. (Fig. 7B), present designation, and paralectotypes NHMUK 20200202/2 to 20200202/3 ex. Cuming coll. (two shells).

21. malangensis (Bullen, 1905)

Chloritis malangensisBullen 1905: 192, pl. 11, fig. 2. Type locality: Malang, Java [error]. Gude 1907: 228.

Moellendorffia eucharista malangensis: Richardson 1985: 184.

Current taxonomic status.

Trichelix. Synonym of Trichelix eucharista (see Gude 1907: 228).

Type specimens.

Syntypes NHMUK 19991540 (two shells, Fig. 7C).

Remarks.

Ancey (1906: 128) stated that specimens sent by Mr Rouyer were often with doubtful or inaccurate locality records, where C. malangensis Bullen, 1905 was described based on Mr Rouyer’s collection. The type locality was mentioned as “Malang Java,” which is erroneous and should be ignored (Ancey 1906; Gude 1907). Ancey (1906: 128) also noticed this species was similar to Moellendorffia eucharista (Pilsbry, 1901) and does not occur in Java. Gude (1907: 228) compared the type specimen of C. malangensis with the Moellendorffia eucharista (Pilsbry, 1901) from Japan and found no differences in any of the shell characters.

22. oshimana (Gude, 1901)

Chloritis oshimanaGude 1901: 157, 158, figs 1–4. Type locality: Oshima, Loo-Choo Isles [Amami Islands, Kagoshima Prefecture]. Minato 2011: 26.

Moellendorffia eucharista oshimana: Richardson 1985: 184.

Current taxonomic status.

Trichelix. Synonym of Trichelix eucharista (see Minato 2011: 26).

Type specimens.

Syntype NHMUK 1922.8.29.83 (one shell, Fig. 7D).

Remark.

Gude (1901: 158) noted that the collection locality was from Oshima, Osumi Province. The type locality of this species is probably in the area of the Amami Islands of Kagoshima.

23. tokunoensis (Pilsbry & Hirase, 1905)

Moellendorffia eucharistus tokunoensisPilsbry and Hirase 1905: 710. Type locality: Tokunoshima, Osumi [Tokunoshima Island, Oshima District, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan].

Moellendorffia tokunoensis: Baker 1963: 247.

Moellendorffia eucharista tokunoensis: Richardson 1985:184, 185.

Moellendorffia (Trichelix) tokunoensis: Minato 1971: 38, 39, figs 3, 4–6. Minato 1980: 190–192, fig. 3. Minato 2011: 28, 29, fig. 5g.

Current taxonomic status.

Trichelix. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Lectotype ANSP 87680 (Fig. 7E) and paralectotypes ANSP 90048 (two shells, Fig. 7F), ANSP 460394 (one shell) from Tokunoshima, Osumi.

Remarks.

The original description did not clearly state how many specimens were available to Pilsbry, although he stated “Types No. 90,048, A. N. S. Phila., from No. 1,207 of Mr. Hirase’s collection.” Later, Baker (1963: 247) designated the ANSP 87680 ex. Hirase no. 1207 lot as the lectotype. This designation is still valid unless there is evidence that ANSP 87680 lot did not form part of the type series (ICZN 1999: Articles 72.1 and 74.2).

III. Genus Moellendorffiella Pilsbry, 1905

Moellendorffia (Moellendorffiella)Pilsbry 1905: 65. Zilch 1960: 612. Zilch 1966: 211.

Moellendorffiella: Schileyko 2003: 1513.

Type species.

Helix (Moellendorffia) erdmanni Schmacker & Boettger, 1894; monotypy.

Diagnosis.

Shell flattened and umbilicate. Periostracum thin, corneous. Last whorl shouldered and descending anteriorly. Aperture subcircular with barriers inside and externally marked with furrows. Parietal callus thin; one palatal lamella; one columellar lamella.

Remarks.

The genus Moellendorffiella differs from Moellendorffia in having one furrow on periphery, parietal callus thin, and without periostracal hair. While, Moellendorffia has one or two furrows on periphery, parietal callus elevated with nodule and short to long periostracal hairs.

24. erdmanni (Schmacker & Boettger, 1894)

Helix (Moellendorffia) erdmanniSchmacker and Boettger 1894: 173, 174, pl. 9, fig. 8. Type locality: China.

Moellendorffia (Moellendorffiella) erdmanni: Zilch 1966: 211, pl. 6, fig. 55.

Moellendorffia erdmanni: Richardson 1985: 184.

Moellendorffiella erdmanni: Schileyko 2003: 1513, fig. 1951.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffiella. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Lectotype SMF 8333/1 (Fig. 8A) and paralectotype SMF 8334 (one shell) from Chang-yang, Hupei, China.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Open in a new tab

AMoellendorffiella erdmanni, lectotype SMF 8333/1 BMoellendorffiella faberiana, holotype SMF 8330/1 CMoellendorffia ? polygyrella, holotype NIGPAS 36428. Photo: T Yü (C).

Remarks.

The lectotype was designated in Zilch (1966: 211).

25. faberiana (Möllendorff, 1888) comb. nov.

Helix faberianaMöllendorff 1888: 39, 40. Type locality: Omi, Sytshuan, 1000 m. alt. [in the area of Sichuan, China].

Moellendorffia (Trichelix) faberiana: Zilch 1966: 211, pl. 6, fig. 56.

Moellendorffia faberiana: Richardson 1985: 185.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffiella. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Holotype SMF 8330/1 (Fig. 8B) and paratype SMF unnumbered (one juvenile in the same holotype lot) from Berg Omi, Szechwan, China.

Remarks.

The distinguishing characters are depressed conic spire, aperture with elevated parietal callus, furrows on periphery and below periphery. Therefore, we move this species to the genus Moellendorffiella.

Species inquirenda

mariae (Nobre, 1909)

Stegodera (Moellendorffia) mariaeNobre 1909: 79. Type locality: Lucira, dist. de Benguella [Lucira Communes, Namibe Province, Angola].

Moellendorffia mariae: Richardson 1985: 185.

Current taxonomic status.

Not a member of Moellendorffia, Trichelix, or Moellendorffiella.

Type specimens.

The type specimen could not be located.

Remarks.

This nominal species was described by Nobre (1909) based on material collected from Angola on the west coast of Africa. Based on the shell morphology, Nobre (1909) attributed this taxon to the Southeast Asian endemic genus Stegodera (Moellendorffia). Later, Richardson (1985) placed this species under the genus Moellendorffia. However, the record of Moellendorffia on the east coast of Africa (Ethiopian Realm) are far outside of the known range of the genus. Thus, further study and anatomical examination are needed to relocate this nominal species into the suitable nominal genus, very probably a Sculptaria Pfeiffer, 1855 (Sculptariidae).

polygyrella Yü, 1982

Moellendorffia ? polygyrella Yü in Yü et al. 1982: 19, 20, pl. 5, figs 10–14. Type locality: Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary red series of Xuaneheng, Langxi and Nanling, Southern Anhui.

Current taxonomic status.

Moellendorffia. Valid species.

Type specimens.

Holotype NIGPAS 36428 (one shell: Fig. 8C) from Xuancheng, Luojing, Anhui, China.

Remarks.

The species was described based on one specimen. The holotype has a relatively small shell (shell width 8 mm) compared to other recent congeners. This species possesses a smooth shell surface and a narrow umbilicus. The outer surface of the last whorl probably has one spiral furrow on the periphery and two spiral furrows below the periphery. These characters suggest the possibility that it is closely related to the genus Traumatophora Ancey, 1887 (see Wu 2019 for a comparison).

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Trichelix
zookeys.952.52695-treatment1.xml (15.1KB, xml)
XML Treatment for Trichelix horrida
zookeys.952.52695-treatment2.xml (49.3KB, xml)

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all members of the Animal Systematics Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University for their kind help during field trips in Laos. Special thanks go to the Faculty of Natural Science, National University of Laos for the preparation of permission documents and data collection in Laos. The authors are also indebted to P. Callomon and E. Wildner (ANSP, Philadelphia), A. Baldinger (MCZ, Massachusetts), P. Bouchet, V. Héros, D. Brabant, M. Caballer, and P. Maestrati (MNHN, Paris), J. Ablett, F. Naggs and H. Taylor (NHM, London), A. Eschner and S. Schnedl (NHMW, Vienna), H. Zhang and T. Yu (NIGPAS, Nanjing), R. Janssen, K.-O. Nagel, and S. Hof (SMF, Frankfurt), T. von Rintelen and C. Zorn (ZMB, Berlin), and J. He (ZMNH AIMS, Hangzhou) for allowing the authors to examine the material housed in the type collections, the type material database, and photographs. This project was mainly funded through grants received from the TRF Strategic Basic Research DBG 6080011 (2017–2019), Center of Excellence on Biodiversity BDC-PG2-161002, The Thailand Research Fund (TRF-DPG6280001), and additional support by CU-ASEAN Scholarships and the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund.

Citation

Sutcharit C, Inkhavilay K, Panha S (2020) Taxonomic note on Trichelix horrida (Pfeiffer, 1863) from Laos, with a type catalogue of Moellendorffia, Trichelix, and Moellendorffiella (Heterobranchia, Camaenidae). ZooKeys 952: 65–93. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.952.52695

References

  1. Ancey C-F. (1887) Description of new genera or subgenera of Helicidae The Conchologists Exchange 1: 64. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28528930
  2. Ancey C-F. (1906) Description de deux espèces novelles ďHelicina. Journal de Conchyliologie 54: 125–128. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16298483 [Google Scholar]
  3. AVMA (2013) AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals. https://www.avma.org/KB/Policies/Documents/euthanasia.pdf [Accessed on: 2014-2-2]
  4. Azuma M. (1982) Colored illustrations of the land snails of Japan. Hoikusha, Japan, 343 pp. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker HB. (1963) Type land snails in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Part II. Land Pulmonata, exclusive of North America North of Mexico. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 115: 191–259. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4064561?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents [Google Scholar]
  6. Bavay A, Dautzenberg P. (1899) Description de coquilles nouvelles de ľIndo-Chine. Journal de Conchyliologie 47: 28–55. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15980403 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bavay A, Dautzenberg P. (1909a) Description de coquilles nouvelles de ľIndo-Chine (5e suite). Journal de Conchyliologie 57: 163–206. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/27393324 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bavay A, Dautzenberg P. (1909b) Molluscorum terrestrum tonkinorum diagnoses. Journal de Conchyliologie 56 [1908]: 229–251. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/55061#page/269/ [Google Scholar]
  9. Benson WH. (1856) Descriptions of one Indian and nine new Burmese Helices; and notes on two Burmese Cyclostomacea Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 2, 18: 249–254. 10.1080/00222935608697626 [DOI]
  10. Bland T. (1858) Descriptions of two new species of North American Helicidae. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York 6: 277–280. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16023883 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1858.tb00369.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bullen RA. (1905) On a new variety of Planispira zebra, Pfr., from the island of Gisser, and a new species of Chloritis from Java. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 6: 191–192. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dautzenberg P, Fischer H. (1905) Liste des mollusques récoltés par M. le Capitaine de Frégate Blaise au Tonkin, et description ďespèces nouvelles. Journal de Conchyliologie 53: 85–234. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16292495 10.5962/bhl.title.13158 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gredler V. (1885) Zur Conchylien-Fauna von China. VIII. Stück. S. Selbstverlag, Bozen, 19 pp. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gredler V. (1887) Zur Conchylien-Fauna von China. XI. Stück. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 2: 283–290. https://www.zobodat.at/publikation_series.php?q=Zur+Conchylien-Fauna+von+China [Google Scholar]
  15. Gude GK. (1901) Description of a new species of Chloritis from the Loo-Choo Islands. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 7 8: 157–158. 10.1080/03745480109442902 [DOI]
  16. Gude GK. (1907) A further contribution to our knowledge of the genus Chloritis, with descriptions of eleven new species. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 7: 228–233. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.mollus.a066178 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Habe T. (1957) Anatomy of Moellendorffia (Trihelix) eucharistus (Pilsbry). The Nautilus 71: 8–9. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8518957 [Google Scholar]
  18. Heude PM. (1885) Notes sur les mollusques terrestres de la vallée du Fleuve Bleu. Mémoires de ľ Histoire Naturelle de ľ Empire Chinois 1(3): 89–132. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34061485 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hwang C-C. (2014) Annotated type catalogue of land snails collected from Taiwan (Formosa) in the Natural History Museum, London. ZooKeys 428: 1–28. 10.3897/zookeys.428.8061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. ICZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4th Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted-sites/iczn/code/ [Google Scholar]
  21. Inkhavilay K, Sutcharit C, Bantaowong U, Chanabun R, Siriwut W, Srisonchai R, Pholyotha A, Jirapatrasilp P, Panha S. (2019) Annotated checklist of the terrestrial molluscs from Laos (Mollusca, Gastropoda). ZooKeys 834: 1–166. 10.3897/zookeys.834.28800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson RI. (1969) Pfeiffer’s Novitates Conchologicae, Series I, Land Mollusca, 1854–1879, and Dunker’s Novitates Conchologicae, Series II, Marine Mollusca, 1862–1882. A complete collation. Journal of the Society for Bibliography of Natural History 5: 236–239. 10.3366/jsbnh.1969.5.3.236 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson RI. (1973) Heude’s Molluscan Types or Asian land and freshwater mollusks, mostly from the People’s Republic of China, described by P.M. Heude. Special Occasional Publication No. 1, Department of Mollusks, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Massachusetts, 111 pp 10.5962/bhl.title.141074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kottelat M, Tan HH. (2018) Three new species of archerfishes from the freshwaters of Southeast Asia (Teleostei: Toxotidae) and notes on Henri Mouhot’s fish collections. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 952: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mabille J. (1887a) Molluscorum Tonkinorum Diagnoses. Masson A., Meulan, 18 pp. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mabille J. (1887b) Sur quelques mollusques du Tonkin. Bulletins de la Société Malacologique de France 4: 73–164. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16139447 [Google Scholar]
  27. Martens E von. (1867) Die Preussische Expedition nach Ost-Asien. Verlag der Königlichen Geheimen Ober-Hofbuchdruckerei, 477 pp. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12890941
  28. Minato H. (1971) Revision of the genus Moellendorffia from the Amami Islands. Venus 30: 35–39. [Google Scholar]
  29. Minato H. (1980) Genitalia of the Japanese land snails – XVI. Moellendorffia (Trichelix) tokunoensis Pilsbry & Hirase, 1905 from Tokunoshima Island. Venus 39: 190–192. [Google Scholar]
  30. Minato H. (2011) A memorandum of the studies of Japanese land snails (8), the genus Moellendorffia (Pulmonata: Camaenidae) from Amami Islands. Chiribotan 45: 20–34. [Google Scholar]
  31. Möllendorff OF von. (1882) Diagnoses specierum novarum Chinae meridionalis. Jahrbücher der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 9: 179–188. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16359972 [Google Scholar]
  32. Möllendorff OF von. (1884) Materialien zur fauna von China. Jahrbücher der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 11: 307–390. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16289265 [Google Scholar]
  33. Möllendorff OF von. (1888) Diagnoses specierum novarum sinensium. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 20: 38–44. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15599672 [Google Scholar]
  34. Möllendorff OF von. (1898) Die Binnenmollusken Annams. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 30: 65–85. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28228483 [Google Scholar]
  35. Möllendorff OF von. (1901) Diagnosen neuer von H. Fruhstorfer in Tongking gesammelter Landschnecken. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 33: 65–81. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15598608 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nobre A. (1909) Materiaux pour ľetude de la faune malacologique des possessions Portugaises de ľAfrique occidentale. Bulletin de la Société Portugaise des Sciences Naturelles 3, Supplement 2: 1–108.
  37. Páll-Gergely B, Hunyadi A, Auffenberg K. (2020) Taxonomic vandalism in malacology: comments on molluscan taxa recently described by N. N. Thach and colleagues (2014–2019). Folia Malacologica 28: 35–76. 10.12657/folmal.028.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Páll-Gergely B, Neubert E. (2019) New insights in Trichochloritis Pilsbry, 1891 and its relatives (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Camaenidae). ZooKeys 865: 137–154. 10.3897/zookeys.865.36296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Panha S, Sutcharit C, Can DN. (2010) An anatomical note on Moellendorffia eastlakeana (Möllendorff, 1882) a camaenid land snail from Vietnam (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Camaenidae). The Nautilus 124: 20–24. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50437634 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pfeiffer L. (1855) Versuch einer Anordnung der Heliceen nach natürlichen Gruppen. Malakozoologische Blätter 2: 112–185. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15864853 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pfeiffer L. (1863) Descriptions of thirty-six new land shells from the collection of H. Cuming, Esq. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 30 [1862]: 268–278. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28627248 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pfeiffer L. (1868a) Monographia Heliceorum Viventium, Supplement Tertium. Volume 5. F.A. Brockhaus, Lipsiae, 565 pp https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12932069 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pfeiffer L. (1868b) [1867–1876] Novitates Conchologicae. Series prima. Mollusca extramarina. Descriptions et figures de coquilles, estramarines nouvelles, ou peu connues. Beschreibung und Abbidung neuer order kritischer Land- und Süsswasser Mollusken. Tome 3, Lief. 25–36: 301–510, plates 73–108. [pp. 369–430, pls 85–96 (1868)]. [Published in parts, dates follow Johnson (1969)]. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/10946681
  44. Pfeiffer L, Kobelt W. (1880) [1877–1897] Die Schnirkelschnecken nebst den zunáchst verwandten Gattungen. Vierter Theil. Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz 1(12) [(4)]: 525–859, plates 162–228. [pp. 563–594, pls 168–172 (1880)] [Published in parts, dates follow Welter-Schultes (1999)]. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/51339237
  45. Pilsbry HA. (1890) [1890–1891] Manual of Conchology, Structure and Systematic, with Illustrations of the Species, Second Series, Volume 6 (Helicidae, Vol. IV). Academy of Natural Science Philadelphia, PA, 366 pp [pp.1–192 (1890)]. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/23626780 [Google Scholar]
  46. Pilsbry HA. (1895) [1893–1895] Manual of Conchology, Structure and Systematic, with Illustrations of the Species, Second Series, Volume 9 (Helicidae, Vol. 7. Guide to the Study of Helices). Academy of Natural Science Philadelphia, PA, 253 pp [pp. 161–336 (1895)]. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1103099 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pilsbry HA. (1901) New land Mollusca from Japan and Loo Choo Island. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia 53: 344–353. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/10089375 10.5962/bhl.title.18235 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pilsbry HA. (1905) Notes on Moellendorffia and Stegodera. The Nautilus 19: 63–67. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1755561 [Google Scholar]
  49. Pilsbry HA, Hirase Y. (1905) New land molluscs from the Japan Empire. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia 57: 705–719. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/6332145 [Google Scholar]
  50. Richardson L. (1985) Camaenidae: catalog of species. Tryonia 12: 1–479. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/57458814 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rolle H. (1911) Diagnosen neuer Arten. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 43: 30–32. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15107491 [Google Scholar]
  52. Schileyko AA. (2003) Treatise on recent terrestrial pulmonate mollusks. Part 11: Trigonochlamydidae, Papillodesmidae, Vitrinidae, Limacidae, Bielziidae, Agriolimacidae, Boettgerillidae, Camaenidae. Ruthenica, Supplement 2: 1467–1626. [Google Scholar]
  53. Schileyko AA. (2011) Check-list of land pulmonate molluscs of Vietnam (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora). Ruthenica 21: 1–68. https://www.biotaxa.org/Ruthenica/article/view/3603 [Google Scholar]
  54. Schmacker B, Boettger O. (1894) Descriptions of some Chinese land-shells. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 1: 169–174. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.mollus.a064109 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Stuart BL, Sok K, Neang T. (2006) A collection of amphibians and reptiles from hilly eastern Cambodia. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 54: 129–155. http://lkcnhm.nus.edu.sg/app/uploads/2017/06/54rbz129-155.pdf [Google Scholar]
  56. Sutcharit C, Panha S. (2010) Taxonomic re-evaluation of Chloritis bifoveata (Benson, 1856) and C. diplochone Möllendorff, 1898 (Pulmonata: Camaeniade). Journal of Conchology 40: 277–285. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sutcharit C, Naggs F, Ablett J, Sang PV, Hao LV, Panha S. (2019) Notes on the sinistral helicoid snail Bertia cambojiensis (Reeve, 1860) from Vietnam (Eupulmonata, Dyakiidae). ZooKeys 885: 1–14. 10.3897/zookeys.885.38980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Thach NN. (2018) New shells of South Asia seashells-freshwater & land snails, 3 new genera, 132 new species & subspecies. 48HrBooks Company, Akron, Ohio, USA, 173 pp. [Google Scholar]
  59. Welter-Schultes FW. (1999) Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz (1837–1920), bibliography of the volumes in Göttingen. Archives of Natural History 26: 157–203. 10.3366/anh.1999.26.2.157 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wu M. (2019) A taxonomic note on the helicoid land snail genus Traumatophora (Eupulmonata, Camaenidae). ZooKeys 835: 139–152. 10.3897/zookeys.835.32697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yang H, Fan Z, Qiao D, He J. (2012) Description of four land snails from China. Shell Discoveries 1(1): 32–33. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yen T-C. (1939) Die chinesischen land- und Süßwasser-Gastropoden des Natur-Museums Senckenberg. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergisch-Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 444: 1–234. [pls 1–16] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yü W, Pan H, Wang H. (1982) Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary non-marine gastropods from Southern Anhui. Memoirs of Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Academia Sinica 17: 1–36. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/36809809 [Google Scholar]
  64. Zilch A. (1951) Zur nomenklatur einiger Landschnecken aus China. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 80: 86.
  65. Zilch A. (1960 [1959–1960]) Gastropoda, Euthyneura. In: Schindewolf OH (Ed.) Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Band 6, Gastropoda. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, 835 pp. [pp. 401–835 (1960)]. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zilch A. (1966) Die typen und typoide des Natur-Museum Senckenberge, 34: Mollusca: Camaenidae (4). Archiv für Molluskenkunde 95: 197–223. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zilch A. (1974) Zur Geschichte der deutschen Malakozoologie, XIV. Vinzenz Gredler und die Erforschung der Weichtiere Chinas durch Franziskaner aus Tirol. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 104: 171–228. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Trichelix
zookeys.952.52695-treatment1.xml (15.1KB, xml)
XML Treatment for Trichelix horrida
zookeys.952.52695-treatment2.xml (49.3KB, xml)

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES