Skip to main content
Paediatrics & Child Health logoLink to Paediatrics & Child Health
. 2020 Jul 1;25(5):317–321. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxaa078

E-cigarettes: A new hazard for children and adolescents

Sarah A Richmond 1,, Ian Pike 1, Jonathon L Maguire 1, Alison Macpherson 1
PMCID: PMC7395323  PMID: 32765168

Abstract

Objectives

Electronic cigarettes and fluid (e-cigarettes, e-fluid) are hazardous materials that when inhaled or ingested may pose significant health risks to children and adolescents. The objective of this work was to explore the spectrum of injury related to e-cigarette exposure among Canadian children and adolescents.

Methods

A one-time survey was sent to all paediatricians in Canada. Information was collected on children and adolescents who presented with e-cigarette exposure (inhalation and ingestion cases) in the previous 12 months. Questions included the number of injuries and symptoms, in addition to age, sex, treatment setting, intentional e-cigarette use, and how the products were accessed.

Results

A total of 520 surveys were completed and returned, identifying 35 cases. Symptoms related to inhalation were present in 30 cases and in 5 ingestion cases (5 unintentional, 0 intentional). For inhalation cases, most were male, ages 15 to 19 years, who sought treatment for nausea/vomiting, cough, throat irritation, or acute nicotine toxicity in an outpatient clinic/office. Most inhalation cases reported e-cigarette use 2 to 3 days/week, and e-cigarettes purchases from a mall kiosk/store. For ingestion cases, most were male, ages 1 to 4 years presenting to an emergency department with nausea/vomiting, cough, or respiratory irritation. Younger cases accessed e-fluid at home, older cases purchased in a mall kiosk/store. E-fluid flavours reported consumed were fruit, candy, and tobacco.

Conclusions

E-cigarettes, recently introduced into the North American market are hazardous to children and adolescents. Given the low response rate to the survey, further investigation into the true burden of injury, as well as the risks that e-cigarettes pose, together with ways to reduce exposure, is needed.

Keywords: Adolescent, Child, Electronic nicotine delivery systems, Wounds and injuries


Children and adolescents represent a vulnerable population in that even small exposures to hazards, particularly ingested hazards, can cause injury or death. Injury prevention efforts in the 1960s and 1970s made significant improvement to morbidity and mortality from unintentional poisoning by implementing product safety standards including recommendations about safe storage, packaging, handling and disposal of prescription and over the counter medication, and household cleaning products (e.g., antifreeze) (1). Despite these successes, unintentional poisoning is one of the only injury types in North America that has demonstrated annual increases in hospitalizations and deaths (2–4). Children under the age of 6 years are most frequently exposed to potential toxins, representing 52% of all exposures (2,4). This may be due to the ever-increasing availability of potentially toxic substances in the market that are available and accessible to children.

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are a type of electronic nicotine delivery system that when activated, vaporizes and delivers inhalable liquid (e-fluid). The e-fluid contains glycerin, propylene glycol, flavourings, and other substances (5) and may or may not contain nicotine in varying concentrations. These materials, when inhaled and/or ingested, pose significant health risks to children and adolescents, including nicotine, a major ingredient found in many e-fluid solutions. Of particular importance with the nicotine found in e-fluids are variations in concentration per refill solution and the significant discrepancy between actual and labelled concentrations (6,7). In Canada and the USA, it is not required by law to meet standards to label the amount of nicotine contained in the e-fluid mixtures (8,9). In addition to nicotine, other ingredients found in e-cigarette devices are harmful to child health and include glycerin, propylene glycol, aldehydes, metals, tobacco-specific alkaloids, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (10). The most popular solvents found in e-fluid are glycerin and propylene glycol (11). When the user initiates inhalation of the e-cigarette device, the heating element raises the temperature of the e-fluid, which in turn, activates changes to the composition of the liquids, forming potentially toxic compounds including formaldehyde and acetaldehyde (11). Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde are widely published as Group 2A and 2B carcinogens, respectively (12). A recent study measured the carbonyl compounds from commercially available e-fluids and found formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in 8 of the 13 samples, with levels of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone comparable to tobacco in high-voltage devices (11). A nicotine concentration of 10 mg is considered a lethal dose in child and adolescent exposures (a dose of 6.5 mg/kg to 13 mg/kg is fatal in adults) (6,13,14); considering the average e-fluid refill container of 10 mL with a reported 20 mg/mL level of nicotine, ingestion of this fluid by a child would exceed lethal concentrations (6,13). In a recent study by Davis et al., nicotine concentrations assessed in over 70 e-cigarette refill fluids ranged from 0 mg/mL to 134 mg/mL (6). The rise in popularity of these devices has raised many unanswered questions about their impact on children and adolescents. Data from the 2013 Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey (CTADS) indicated that approximately 2.5 million Canadians ages 15 years and older reported having experimented with an e-cigarette device (15). One in five youth ages 15 to 19 years as well as young adults ages 20 to 24 years reported at least one use of an e-cigarette, the highest reported use across all age groups (15). Data from middle school students who completed the 2013 National Youth Tobacco Survey in the USA demonstrated increased use from 1.4% in 2011 to 3% in 2013 among those who reported having ever used an e-cigarette (16). In Canada, 14.6% of secondary students that responded to the Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey (OSDUHS) in 2013 reported lifetime e-cigarette use; in 2015, the proportion increased to 28.2% (17). In addition, despite legislation in Canada that restricts e-cigarette products from containing nicotine (18), 18.8% of OSDUHS regular use respondents reported use of a nicotine-containing e-cigarette (17,19). In addition to the known adverse health effects of nicotine and other toxic exposures found in e-fluid for youth, the potential risk of serious injury or death among children from poisoning from contact with the e-fluid is high (20). Canadian and US studies have reported an increase in calls to poison centres due to exposure to e-cigarette products, particularly ingestion of the e-fluid in younger children (21–25).

More information on the frequency of child and adolescent exposure to these devices and their content is needed to understand the underlying risk. There are minimal data in Canada and the USA on the adverse affects of e-cigarette exposure among youth. In particular, there is minimal information on the unintentional ingestion of e-fluid (often flavoured with candy, chocolate, alcohol, and fruit, for example) used for refilling the device. In addition, much of the information on potentially adverse exposures to e-cigarettes among children and adolescents comes from poison centres, and much of this information focuses on young children. Descriptions of potentially adverse exposures among older children, particularly adolescents, are lacking. Moreover, much of the literature on e-cigarettes is from the USA and Europe. The aim of this study was to describe the spectrum of injuries observed by Canadian paediatricians related to inhalation of e-cigarettes or ingestion of e-cigarette fluid among children and youth.

METHODS

In 2015 a cross-sectional study was conducted by administering a one-time survey (https://www.cpsp.cps.ca/uploads/surveys/e-cigarettes-e-liquid-survey-questions.pdf) to all practicing paediatricians participating in the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program (CPSP) (n=2,533). The CPSP conducts national surveillance on paediatric disorders or conditions that are high in disability, morbidity, mortality, and economic cost to society, despite low frequency. The CPSP gathers information through multiyear studies and one-time surveys. In December 2015, participants were asked about the number and injuries/symptoms of children and adolescents who had presented with e-cigarette exposure (inhalation and ingestion cases) in the previous 12 months. In addition, information was collected on patients’ age, sex, treatment setting sought, e-cigarette use, and access.

Exposure was categorized into either ingestion or inhalation cases. Questions for cases included patient age group (<1 year, 1 to 4 years, 5 to 9 years, 10 to 14 years, 15 to <19 years) and sex (male, female). Health care setting was categorized as office or outpatient clinic, hospital inpatient ward, hospital emergency department, or other (specify). Injury and/or symptom categories included nausea/vomiting, cough, throat irritation, mouth irritation, respiratory irritation, symptoms of acute nicotine toxicity (other than nausea/vomiting), burn (skin, mouth/esophagus), decrease in pulmonary function (e.g., increased dynamic airway resistance), central nervous system depression, other (specify). Access to the e-fluid was categorized by purchases from the Internet, from a mall kiosk/convenience store, in the home, from parents/caregivers, friends, unknown, or other (specify). Finally, respondents were asked to indicate the types of flavours most commonly reported ingested from the following: tobacco, fruit, coffee, menthol, candy, alcohol, unknown, and other (specify). Respondents were also asked to provide the frequency of reported use of e-cigarettes in inhalation cases that included: once, once per week, two to three times per week, four to seven times per week, and more than seven times per week.

All data were analyzed using STATA 12.0 (StataCorp, Texas) software and aggregate descriptive data are reported. This study did not require research ethics approval due to the aggregate and anonymous collection of data for surveillance purposes.

RESULTS

Of the 2,533 paediatricians and paediatric subspecialists in Canada, 520 surveys were received, representing a 20.5% response frequency. Twenty per cent of respondents indicated that the topic presented in the survey was not relevant to their area of practice. Over the previous year period, there were 35 children and adolescents under the age of 19 years, seen by paediatricians for injuries/symptoms from exposure to e-cigarettes. Approximately half of the patients were seen by a general paediatrician and the other half by a paediatric subspecialist. Of the cases seen by subspecialists, most were emergency medicine, adolescent medicine, gastroenterology, or infectious disease experts. Symptoms related to inhalation were present in 30 cases (3 unintentional, 27 intentional) and in 5 ingestion cases (5 unintentional, 0 intentional) (see Table 1 for characteristics by ingestion and inhalation case type).

Table 1.

Aggregate* patient characteristics

Inhalation cases (n=30) Ingestion cases (n=5)
Age 15–19 years 1–4 years
Most reported injuries/symptoms Cough, nausea/vomiting Nausea/vomiting, cough
Setting patient treated Outpatient clinic/office Emergency department
E-cigarette use 2–3 times/week N/A
E-cigarette access Mall kiosk/store Home

*Data shown represent characteristics for the majority of cases presented in each category (inhalation vs. ingestion).

N/A Not applicable.

For inhalation cases, the majority of cases were reported to be male, ages 15 to 19 years. Cases most often sought treatment for cough, nausea/vomiting, throat irritation, or acute nicotine toxicity in an outpatient clinic or office. Most inhalation cases reported e-cigarette use 2 to 3 days per week, and e-cigarettes purchases from a mall kiosk/store. For ingestion cases, most were male, ages 1 to 4 years presenting to an emergency department with nausea/vomiting, cough, or respiratory irritation. Younger ingestion cases accessed e-fluid at home, older cases purchased it in a mall kiosk/store. E-fluid flavours reported consumed were fruit, candy, and tobacco.

DISCUSSION

The results of this survey suggest that e-cigarette materials may cause injury to Canadian children and youth who are exposed. The number of cases reported from the CPSP survey, however, should be interpreted with caution. The response rate for this survey was low and may not capture the true burden of cases that have presented to practicing paediatricians in Canada.

E-cigarettes have increased in popularity and accessibility in Canada in recent years (8). What remains unknown is the adverse affects of e-cigarettes among children and youth, including exposure from inhalation and ingestion of the associated products (i.e., vapour and e-fluid). In 2009, Health Canada provided guidelines for the importation and sale of e-cigarettes and related products that contained nicotine. What remained, however, was the ability for consumers of all ages to purchase e-cigarettes and related products, particularly over the Internet, and these products have been cited to have significant variability in the actual nicotine content in the e-fluid (6,7). Legislation to control the sale and use of e-cigarettes at the federal level has not been passed; however, there is some regulation at the provincial and territorial level in Canada. Provinces in Canada that have passed legislation to include e-cigarettes in the Tobacco Sale and Access Act that include restrictions on the sale or purchase of e-cigarette and e-cigarette products include Ontario (January 2016—passed), British Columbia (March 2015—introduced), Manitoba (November 2015—passed), Nova Scotia (May 2015—passed), New Brunswick (July 2015—passed), Quebec (November 2015—passed), and Prince Edward Island (June 2015—introduced). Provinces and territories yet to introduce provincial legislation include Saskatchewan, Northwest Territories, Yukon, Nunavut, Newfoundland & Labrador, and Alberta. Of the provinces that have enacted legislation, all provinces except Ontario have also included legislation to include e-cigarettes in the Smoke-Free Places Act that restricts use of e-cigarettes in specified locations (e.g., bars, restaurants, hotels, etc.).

Regulation of e-cigarettes and e-fluid contents and packaging are also issues of concern in Canada. The liquid used in e-cigarette devices is often flavoured with candy and fruit: flavouring that may be appealing to the first-time, experimental user. In addition, the labelling for e-fluids is often colourful, which may draw the attention of younger children who are unaware of the contents of the product, placing them at risk of unintentional ingestion. From this survey, 34 cases presented to a health care setting as a result of unintentional ingestion of e-fluids. Unintentional ingestion of e-fluid is of serious concern as labelling is not required to meet any restrictive or legal standards in Canada (8). In addition, there is no legislation to label the actual nicotine content in e-fluids, and it has been reported that these concentrations vary widely (6,7). Finally, there have been several reports in mainstream media of e-cigarette devices causing serious injury by exploding. In the October 2014 report from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in the USA, there were 25 separate incidents of explosion and fire involving an e-cigarette device reported in the media (26). In a recent review of all media sources found on local and national sites on the Internet, there have been a total of 183 reports of e-cigarette explosions (27).

The results of this survey are consistent with the existing literature. For both inhalation and ingestion, the majority of cases were reported to be male. This is consistent with self-reported data from the Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey that reported males (14.5%) were significantly more likely to use e-cigarettes, compared with females (8.7%) (17). In addition, a recent study by Reid et al. found Canadian male teens to have slightly higher self-reported use of e-cigarettes over females (28). Data from the USA also support higher use among males; 15% of males compared with 11.9% of females reported use of an e-cigarette in the previous 30 days (16,29) and Forrester et al. reported 51% of cases reported to Texas poison centres were male (24). This is the first study in Canada to report the adverse health effects of exposure to e-cigarettes and e-fluid in children and adolescents. Studies from the US cite similar reported injuries including cough, mouth and throat irritation (30–33); however, these studies were reported adult e-cigarette users. One US study in children under the age of 5 reported the most commonly reported clinical effects of cases included vomiting, drowsiness, and cough (24). US poison control centres have reported a 28-fold increase (84 cases in 2011 to 2,360 cases in 2014), in the number of calls about children ages 5 and under who had been exposed to e-fluid containing nicotine (34), and an increase in the number of cases of acute nicotine toxicity from unintentional exposures to e-fluid, including one reported child death (20).

Strengths and limitations

There are some strengths to this work. This is the first time that data have been collected on the type of symptoms and injuries presented to paediatricians for e-cigarette-related exposure in children and youth in Canada.

There are, however, several limitations to this work. The first includes the data collection tool used. A survey of this kind (one-page data collection limit) does not allow for a fulsome understanding of the types of injuries that presented to physicians following e-cigarette materials exposure. Further, at the time the survey was issued, the data could only be collected at an aggregate level; therefore, the data presented do not represent injuries and symptoms at an individual level. In addition, as with all survey data collection methods, there is a risk of recall bias in the report of the number of cases reported. Paediatricians were asked to generalize the number of cases seen over the previous 12 months; therefore, the number of cases reported may represent an under or overestimation of the true number of both inhalation and ingestion cases. Finally, the response rate of the survey was low, with only 20.5%, or 520 of the 2,533 paediatricians in Canada responding. The low response rate precludes an understanding of the true burden of injury from e-cigarette materials exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

E-cigarettes, recently introduced into the Canadian market are causing harm to children and adolescents. Data on the injuries presented to paediatricians from exposure to e-cigarettes and e-fluids are summarized here; however, much more work is needed to understand the true burden of injury as well as the mechanisms of injury among Canadian children and youth. Children and youth reported in this survey presented to paediatricians with injuries including cough, nausea/vomiting, throat and respiratory irritation, or acute nicotine toxicity. Improving education for parents and caregivers about the risk of injury that can result from exposure to e-cigarettes and e-fluid may reduce the risk. However, more stringent legislation around the use, access, and control of sale and purchase of e-cigarettes in Canada and the USA is needed. Policy recommendations from the Canadian Paediatric Society related to the federal Tobacco Control Act include: regulation of the marketing, packaging (including child-resistant packaging on all e-fluid containers), and labelling of devices (i.e., enforcement of a maximum dose of nicotine in e-fluids together with accurate labelling; all packaging to include information of the potential and known harmful effects of use; banning advertising, sponsorship, and marketing at events and activities where children and youth are involved); restriction of e-cigarette manufacturers or sellers from making positive health claims related to the use of the products; restrictions on the sale of e-cigarettes and products over the Internet to identified adults with direct mailing options; and enactment of legislation, across all provinces and territories, making it illegal for children and youth (by provincial legal age determinants) to use, purchase, or have any form of e-cigarette device (8). The American Association for Cancer Research, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the American Academy of Pediatrics have called for regulation in the USA, recommending that all levels of government regulate the sale, labelling, advertising, and packaging of e-cigarette and related products (20,35). Further investigation into the health impacts, patterns of use, access, and mechanisms to reduce the risks that e-cigarettes pose to children and adolescents is needed to minimize injury and to provide the evidence to support provincial and federal advocacy for policy change. Finally, Canadians should follow the progress being made by the recent introduction of Bill S-7, first read into parliament on November 22, 2016 (36). This Bill proposes to amend the existing Tobacco Act and the Non-smokers Health Act to regulate vaping and vaping products under the newly renamed Act, the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act (36). This Bill does not include all of the recommendations provided in this paper; however, it is a step in the right direction to regulate these hazardous products with respect to selling, packaging, labelling, and use.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge all of the participating paediatricians in Canada for taking part on this survey. In addition, we would like to thank the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program, a partnership between the Canadian Paediatric Society and the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Funding: AM reports grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research during the conduct of the study.

Potential Conflicts of Interest: All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

  • 1. Warner M, Chen LH, Makuc DM, Anderson RN, Miniño AM. Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980–2008. NCHS Data Brief 2011;81:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chen Y, Mo F, Yi QL, Jiang Y, Mao Y. Unintentional injury mortality and external causes in Canada from 2001 to 2007. Chronic Dis Inj Can 2013;33(2):95–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bond GR, Woodward RW, Ho M. The growing impact of pediatric pharmaceutical poisoning. J Pediatr 2012;160(2):265–70.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. British Columbia Injury Research and Prevention Unit (BCIRPU) [Internet]. British Columbia: Poison quick facts <http://www.injuryresearch.bc.ca/quick-facts/poisoning/> (Accessed April 30, 2016).
  • 5. Etter JF, Zäther E, Svensson S. Analysis of refill liquids for electronic cigarettes. Addiction 2013;108(9):1671–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Davis B, Dang M, Kim J, Talbot P. Nicotine concentrations in electronic cigarette refill and do-it-yourself fluids. Nicotine Tob Res 2015;17(2):134–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Goniewicz ML, Kuma T, Gawron M, Knysak J, Kosmider L. Nicotine levels in electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15(1):158–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Stanwick R. E-cigarettes: Are we renormalizing public smoking? Reversing five decades of tobacco control and revitalizing nicotine dependency in children and youth in Canada. Paediatr Child Heal 2015;20(2):101–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. US Department of Health and Human Services. US Drug and Food Administration [Internet]. Silver Springs: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) Updated May 9, 2016; <http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/PublicHealthFocus/ucm172906.htm> (Accessed June 2, 2016).
  • 10. Cheng T. Chemical evaluation of electronic cigarettes. Tob Control 2014;23(Suppl 2):ii11–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Fik M, et al. Carbonyl compounds in electronic cigarette vapors: Effects of nicotine solvent and battery output voltage. Nicotine Tob Res 2014;16(10):1319–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Volume 83, Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking Geneva, 2004. <http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol83/mono83-1.pdf> (Accessed June 2, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mayer B. How much nicotine kills a human? Tracing back the generally accepted lethal dose to dubious self-experiments in the nineteenth century. Arch Toxicol 2014;88(1):5–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Etter JF, Bullen C, Flouris AD, Laugesen M, Eissenberg T. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: A research agenda. Tob Control 2011;20(3):243–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Statistics Canada. [Internet] Ottawa: Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drugs Survey (CTADS) Updated February 3, 2015; <http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/science-re-search-sciences-recherches/data-donnees/ctads-ectad/summa-ry-sommaire-2013-eng.php> (Accessed June 2, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Arrazola RA, Singh T, Corey CG, et al. ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Tobacco use among middle and high school students - United States, 2011-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64(14):381–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Boak A, Hamilton H, Adlaf E, Mann R.. Drug Use Among Ontario Students, 1977–2015: OSDUHS Highlights. Toronto, ON: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Czoli C, Reid J, Rynard VL, Hammond D. E-Cigarettes in Canada - Tobacco Use in Canada: Patterns and Trends, 2015 Edition, Special Supplement 2015. <http://www.tobaccoreport.ca/2013/TobaccoUseinCanada_2013.pdf> (Accessed June 2, 2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19. Hamilton HA, Ferrence R, Boak A, et al. Ever use of nicotine and nonnicotine electronic cigarettes among high school students in Ontario, Canada. Nicotine Tob Res 2015;17(10):1212–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Walley SC, Jenssen BP; Section on Tobacco Control Electronic nicotine delivery systems. Pediatrics 2015;136(5):1018–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kim JW, Baum CR. Liquid nicotine toxicity. Pediatr Emerg Care 2015;31(7):517–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gill N, Sangha G, Poonai N, Lim R. E-cigarette liquid nicotine ingestion in a child: Case report and discussion. CJEM 2015;17(6):699–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Vakkalanka JP, Hardison LS Jr, Holstege CP. Epidemiological trends in electronic cigarette exposures reported to U.S. Poison Centers. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2014;52(5):542–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Forrester MB. Pediatric exposures to electronic cigarettes reported to Texas poison centers. J Emerg Med 2015;49(2):136–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gupta S, Gandhi A, Manikonda R. Accidental nicotine liquid ingestion: Emerging paediatric problem. Arch Dis Child 2014;99(12):1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Federal Emergency Management Agency. US Department of Homeland Security. [Internet] New York: Electronic Cigarette Fires and Explosions; <https://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/elec-tronic_cigarettes.pdf> (Accessed October 4, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ecigone.com [Internet]. E-Cigarette Explosions: Comprehensive List Updated July 13, 2016; <http://ecigone.com/featured/e-cigarette-explosions-comprehensive-list/> (Accessed October 4, 2016).
  • 28. Reid JL, Rynard VL, Czoli CD, Hammond D. Who is using e-cigarettes in Canada? Nationally representative data on the prevalence of e-cigarette use among Canadians. Prev Med 2015;81:180–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lippert AM. Do adolescent smokers use E-cigarettes to help them quit? The sociodemographic correlates and cessation motivations of U.S. adolescent E-cigarette use. Am J Health Promot 2015;29(6):374–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Bhatnagar A, Whitsel LP, Ribisl KM, et al. Electronic cigarettes: A policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014;130(16):1418–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bullen C, McRobbie H, Thornley S, Glover M, Lin R, Laugesen M. Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: Randomised cross-over trial. Tob Control 2010;19(2):98–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Flouris AD, Chorti MS, Poulianiti KP, et al. Acute impact of active and passive electronic cigarette smoking on serum cotinine and lung function. Inhal Toxicol 2013;25(2):91–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Goniewicz ML, Lingas EO, Hajek P. Patterns of electronic cigarette use and user beliefs about their safety and benefits: An internet survey. Drug Alcohol Rev 2013;32(2):133–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR Jr, Bailey JE, Ford M. 2012 Annual report of the American association of poison control centers’ national poison data system (NPDS): 30th Annual Report. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2013;51(10):949–1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Brandon TH, Goniewicz ML, Hanna NH, et al. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: A policy statement from the American association for cancer research and the American society of clinical oncology. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(8):952–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Senate of Canada. [Internet]Bill S-5: An Act to Amend the Tobacco Act and the Non-smokers’ Health Act and to Make Consequential Amendments to Other Acts Updated April 4, 2017; <http://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/bill/S-5/first-reading> (Accessed May 23, 2017).

Articles from Paediatrics & Child Health are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES