Significance
Hyperpolarized 129Xe NMR/MRI is a useful method for diagnosis of diseases of the respiratory system. However, the sensitive detection of specific compounds in blood remains a challenge because of the weak 129Xe signal in aqueous solution. We developed a way, Hyper-SAME, to promote the 129Xe signal in aqueous solution. The 129Xe signal intensity is four times beyond that of free 129Xe in water and 200 times better than the benchmark molecular cage, cryptophane-A, in its saturated aqueous solution. Additionally, the hyperpolarized 129Xe signal can be amplified further by combining Hyper-SAME with hyperpolarized 129Xe chemical exchange saturation transfer.
Keywords: MOFs, NMR, Hyper-CEST, MRI, signal advancement
Abstract
We report hyperpolarized Xe signal advancement by metal-organic framework (MOF) entrapment (Hyper-SAME) in aqueous solution. The 129Xe NMR signal is drastically promoted by entrapping the Xe into the pores of MOFs. The chemical shift of entrapped 129Xe is clearly distinguishable from that of free 129Xe in water, due to the surface and pore environment of MOFs. The influences from the crystal size of MOFs and their concentration in water are studied. A zinc imidazole MOF, zeolitic imidazole framework-8 (ZIF-8), with particle size of 110 nm at a concentration of 100 mg/mL, was used to give an NMR signal with intensity four times that of free 129Xe in water. Additionally, Hyper-SAME is compatible with hyperpolarized 129Xe chemical exchange saturation transfer. The 129Xe NMR signal can be amplified further by combining the two techniques. More importantly, Hyper-SAME provides a way to make detection of hyperpolarized 129Xe in aqueous solution convenient and broadens the application area of MOFs.
Gas molecules are excellent probes for bioimaging using NMR techniques (1–4). This approach has great potential for noninvasive diagnosis and therapy evaluation of diseases of the respiratory system with merits unmatched by other techniques (5, 6). Among the gaseous probes, 129Xe has been most widely explored and is able to provide high signal intensity through hyperpolarization. Additionally, the 129Xe NMR signal intensity can be amplified through a technology called hyperpolarized Xe signal amplification by gas extraction (Hyper-SAGE) (7). However, 129Xe NMR detection is not specific; if it is directly used for biological system detection, the contrast between the biological tissues and blood is usually low due to the similar chemical shifts of 129Xe in these aqueous environments (8). Recently, molecular cages such as cryptophane-A (CrypA) have been successfully applied to bind hyperpolarized 129Xe into its pore to give a unique chemical shift different from that of 129Xe in aqueous solution (9). Coupling cryptophane with functional groups that can be tailored chemically, these molecular cages provide desirable selectivity for the imaging of target biomolecules or cells by NMR (10–15). Additionally, the captured 129Xe atoms reversibly bind to cages and can be detected at ultralow concentration through hyperpolarized 129Xe chemical exchange saturation transfer (Hyper-CEST) (16). However, the low solubility of these cages in aqueous solution results in limited sensitivity of the corresponding 129Xe NMR signal, even when saturated aqueous solutions are used. The intensities of 129Xe signals in these cages are usually less than 1/10 that of free 129Xe dissolved in water (Fig. 1B); therefore, the main portion of 129Xe is left unutilized. The molecular structure of these cages allows for chemical modification with hydrophilic functional groups to increase their solubility (17, 18). It remains challenging to bring up the signal intensity to exceed that of free 129Xe in water in fast and direct detection. Here, we show that the signal intensity of hyperpolarized 129Xe is enhanced by hyperpolarized Xe signal advancement by metal-organic framework (MOF) entrapment (Hyper-SAME) in aqueous solution (Fig. 1). Specifically, a water-stable MOF composed of zinc and 2-methylimidazole (mIM), ZIF-8 (19, 20), was synthesized with tunable nanocrystal sizes for the optimal accommodation of Xe. The zinc ions at the framework surface provide excellent dispersity for these MOF nanoparticles in water. In addition, the hydrophobic pore environment offers specific interaction with the Xe atom, reflected in a characteristic chemical shift near 84 ppm (parts per million), which is ∼109 ppm apart from that of free 129Xe in aqueous solution (near 193 ppm). The peak of entrapped 129Xe is unambiguously identified, and its intensity exceeds that of free 129Xe in aqueous solution (Fig. 1 A and B), leading to a high utilization rate of 129Xe. The signal intensity of hyperpolarized 129Xe entrapped in MOF pores, corresponding to integral, is four times stronger than that of free 129Xe, 80 times stronger than that of the-state-of-the-art CrypA modified with one carboxylate group, and 200 times stronger than that of pristine CrypA, all at saturated conditions with identical volumes of water (SI Appendix, Figs. S28 and S29).
MOFs are porous crystalline materials constructed by metal-containing units with organic linkers (21–24) and have wide potential use in gas capture and separation (25–30), biomolecule encapsulation (31), and biomedical applications (32, 33). Gas molecules have been routinely used to study the pore environment of MOFs (19–33), with 129Xe as one of the probes (34–37). However, the capability of MOFs to promote NMR signal of hyperpolarized 129Xe in aqueous solution was left unexplored. Different from conventional molecular hosts used to trap Xe atoms (38–42), the high surface area and porosity of MOFs are ideally suited to concentrate Xe atoms into the pores, separating them from aqueous solution. Therefore, MOFs not only provide a unique chemical shift as a fingerprint peak for entrapped hyperpolarized 129Xe but are also capable of greatly enhancing the NMR signals. In this study we demonstrated the 129Xe NMR signal amplification by MOFs. The water-soluble surface, hydrophobic pore environment, and chemical stability of ZIF-8, combined with its suitable pore size for 129Xe, make it an excellent molecular host for 129Xe and its NMR signal advancement in aqueous solution.
Results and Discussion
ZIF-8 nanoparticles were synthesized by mixing solutions of 2-methyl-imidazolate and zinc salts. The particle sizes of ZIF-8 were precisely controlled by reaction time and solvent types (SI Appendix, section S1). A series of five ZIF-8 nanoparticles with gradually increasing particle sizes, 50, 110, 120, 300, and 700 nm, were prepared with narrow size distributions, as reflected by their dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis (SI Appendix, Figs. S1–S5 and Table S1). The typical dodecahedral-shaped ZIF-8 crystals were unambiguous in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images (Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Figs. S7–S10). The pores of ZIF-8 were also clearly revealed in high-resolution TEM images (SI Appendix, Figs. S8 and S9). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of these particles matched well with the simulated pattern based on the single-crystal structure of ZIF-8, demonstrating their phase purity (SI Appendix, Fig. S11). Solvent molecules in the pores of ZIF-8 were removed by solvent exchange followed by exposure to vacuum. No weight loss was observed before 300 °C in the thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) of these samples, indicating the complete removal of solvent (SI Appendix, Fig. S14). The permanent porosity was confirmed by the high uptake in the N2 adsorption isotherm at 77 K. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface areas of these samples were around 1,400 m2/g, and the pore size distribution was around 11 Å (SI Appendix, Figs. S15–S25), both consistent with previous reports (19, 20, 34).
The solvent-free ZIF-8 nanoparticles were directly used to entrap hyperpolarized 129Xe in aqueous solution. A characteristic peak at 84 ppm emerged in aqueous solution with 5.0 mg/mL of ZIF-8 nanoparticles in 110-nm size (Fig. 1B). The influence of the particle size and the MOF content in the solution was investigated. We found that the entrapped 129Xe NMR signal increased as more ZIF-8 with identical particle size presented in the solution, without altering the peak position (Fig. 1D). A linear relationship was established between the intensity of the entrapped 129Xe NMR signal and ZIF-8 content in the range from 2.5 mg/mL to 25 mg/mL (SI Appendix, Fig. S30). Further increase of ZIF-8 content to 100 mg/mL led to a maximum 129Xe signal intensity; however, if there was too much MOF, for example exceeding 100 mg/mL, the signal intensity did not increase any more. The impact of particle size was different from that of MOF content in aqueous solution. Not only the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was changed but the peak position was also different (Fig. 2B). The chemical shift of entrapped 129Xe in the pores moved from 88 ppm to 82 ppm as the particle size of ZIF-8 increased from 50 nm to 300 nm (Fig. 2 B and C), while the SNR was increased by twofold (SI Appendix, Table S4). Further increasing the particle size to 700 nm the chemical shift of the signal was kept at 82 ppm, but the SNR slightly decreased, which could be attributed to the worse dispersity of these larger nanoparticles in water. The low dispersity of these larger nanoparticles influenced the gas capture ability of ZIF-8, which caused the NMR signal of entrapped Xe weak. We speculated that if the size of ZIF-8 was too small, the exchange between the entrapped and dissolved 129Xe would be too fast, which resulted in a short relaxation time and a broad signal peak width. The ZIF-8 nanoparticle with too small size also exhibited insufficient pores to capture Xe, which also made the signal intensity weak. According to our results (SI Appendix, Table S4), 110 nm is the optimal particle size, considering both the SNR and peak width of entrapped 129Xe in ZIF-8. Due to the gas concentration ability of ZIF-8 in aqueous solution, the 129Xe entrapped in ZIF-8 with nanoparticle size of 110 nm gave the highest NMR signal intensity (signal integral), fourfold higher than that of free 129Xe in aqueous solution under the same experimental conditions (SI Appendix, Fig. S28). This value is 200 times that of 129Xe entrapped in a saturated aqueous solution of CrypA (SI Appendix, Fig. S29). Hyper-SAME enhanced the 129Xe NMR signal through the gas concentration ability of MOFs, which is different from Hyper-SAGE. Although the mechanism is different, the gas NMR signal promoted effect in aqueous solution of Hyper-SAME is as well as Hyper-SAGE. We can conclude that it is an efficient signal advancement strategy.
Additionally, Hyper-SAME was combined with Hyper-CEST to further amplify the NMR signal of entrapped Xe in MOF pores. When tested at a low concentration of ZIF-8 (100 μg/mL) in aqueous solution, there was no signal appearing near 84 ppm with direct detection (Fig. 3A), but two saturation responses were displayed in the Hyper-CEST spectrum (Fig. 3B). One saturation response was attributed to the direct saturation of free dissolved 129Xe (center at δ = 193 ppm), whereas the other was centered at 84 ppm, arising from the saturation transfer from 129Xe entrapped in ZIF-8. Although the concentration of ZIF-8 is low (100 µg/mL), the Hyper-CEST effect is ∼90%, which means that the Hyper-CEST can be used to amplify the NMR signal of entrapped 129Xe. Hyper-CEST MRI of ZIF-8 at low concentration (100 µg/mL) in aqueous solution was also done. The signal intensity of Hyper-CEST images is strong, and the Hyper-CEST effect is almost 65% (Fig. 3C). These results unambiguously demonstrate that the ZIF-8 is a good host for 129Xe to use in hyperpolarized 129Xe NMR signal advancement.
The interaction between the entrapped 129Xe and the pores of ZIF-8 was studied by variable-temperature 129Xe NMR experiments as well as X-ray diffraction. The chemical shift of 129Xe dissolved in aqueous solution in the presence of ZIF-8 showed a nonlinear behavior (Fig. 4D), similar to that observed in pure water and in the presence of other molecular hosts. On the other hand, hyperpolarized 129Xe signal entrapped in the pores of ZIF-8 exhibited a linear correlation with temperature between 278 and 320 K (Fig. 4D) and a negative slope, which was consistent with previous studies of MOFs (37, 43) but distinctively different from those in other molecular hosts (42, 44–46). Since there can be multiple Xe atoms in MOF pores, Xe–Xe interactions take place, which cannot occur relative to in the other molecular hosts with only one Xe atom per cavity (37, 44–49). At higher temperatures, the chaotic motion of Xe is more vigorous, which shortens the residence time of Xe in ZIF-8 pores and decreases the Xe–Xe interactions, leading to the upfield change in the chemical shift of entrapped 129Xe in comparison to lower temperatures.
The electron density of 129Xe trapped in the pores of ZIF-8 was visualized by X-ray diffraction. Difference Fourier analysis of the measured intensity profile of the 129Xe-filled ZIF-8 samples was subtracted by the calculated intensity profile of pristine ZIF-8 as background, refined based on 2,242 (47 independent) reflections (Fig. 4 A and B and SI Appendix, Figs. S33 and S34). Although the exact atomic position of 129Xe could not be determined due to disorder, the electron density map provided enough resolution to reveal the distribution of confined 129Xe in the ZIF-8 pores, except for the electron density at the symmetry point of the pore center, which might be affected by termination effects in the Fourier synthesis. A large portion of the electron density was found close to the six-membered ring in ZIF-8 (Fig. 4A), while electron density is absent at the four-membered ring position (Fig. 4B). This indicates 129Xe atom prefers to interact with the larger window size six-membered ring rather than the four-membered ring.
The impact of MOF pore size and pore aperture size was also studied. When an MOF with identical sod topology to ZIF-8, but with smaller pore size and aperture size, here ZIF-7, was tested on the same condition, only one peak appeared at 193 ppm representing the dissolved 129Xe in water (Fig. 4C). The absence of peaks from entrapped 129Xe indicated that the aperture size of ZIF-7 is too small to accommodate the Xe atom (SI Appendix, Fig. S35). This result demonstrates that the aperture size of ZIF-8 is just sufficient for the inclusion of Xe into its pores. The chemical shift of 129Xe in a ZIF-8 solid sample was slightly different (only 2 ppm) from that in aqueous solution of ZIF-8, indicating the absence of water molecules in its hydrophobic pores.
Conclusions
In summary, we demonstrated that MOFs can be used as efficient hosts to enhance NMR signal of hyperpolarized 129Xe in aqueous solution by entrapment in their pores. A maximum 200-fold improvement was observed by ZIF-8 in comparison to that of CrypA in saturated solution, while providing a unique chemical shift of 84 ppm. The favorable interaction between Xe and MOF pores, which depends on the parameters of pores and pore apertures, are critical for the signal improvement. We expected that this method could not only be applied with ZIF-8 but also be extended to more MOFs to enhance the NMR signal of gas in aqueous solution. This discovery will also help broaden the application scope of MOFs. Additionally, Hyper-SAME is also compatible with Hyper-CEST, making it a valuable tool for the detection and imaging of trace molecules in biological systems by NMR technique in the future.
Materials and Methods
Synthesis and Activation of ZIF-8.
Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O (734.4 mg, 2.47 mmol) and mIM (810.6 mg, 9.87 mmol) were separately dissolved in MeOH (50 mL). The solution of mIM was poured into the solution of zinc salt under vigorous stirring. After the mixture fully mixed, the stirring was stopped immediately. Then, the white precipitate was centrifuged from the solution after standing 24 h. The residual organic linkers and metal ions in the solid were removed by washing with MeOH for three times. The pure ZIF-8 nanoparticles were dried under vacuum at room temperature and degassed in vacuum at 120 °C for 12 h. Different modulators were combined with the mIM solution to control the size of ZIF-8, as described in SI Appendix, section S1.
Hyperpolarized 129Xe NMR.
For the hyperpolarized 129Xe NMR experiments, after the gas mixture polarized (home-built hyperpolarizer, hyperpolarized 129Xe nuclear spin polarization was 100,000 times greater than its thermal equilibrium polarization), the gas was directly bubbled into the NMR tube containing the MOF sample (10 mm NMR) for 20 s; a delay of 3 s allowed the bubbles to collapse. A zg sequence (rectangular pulse, the pulse length p1 = 31.8 μs) was then applied to acquire the spectrum. For the variable-temperature experiments, a range of temperatures from 278 K to 320 K was used, in steps of 2 K. After a temperature stabilization time of 10 min, the 129Xe NMR was obtained. For all experiments, the sample temperature was controlled by a variable temperature (VT) unit installed on the NMR spectrometer.
Hyper-CEST Spectrum.
For the Hyper-CEST experiment, after the hyperpolarized gas mixture was directly bubbled into the NMR tube (10 mm NMR) for 20 s a 3-s delay time allowed the bubbles to collapse. A continuous-wave pulse (6.5 μT, 10 s) was then applied to saturate the Xe in the ZIF-8 pores, and the 129Xe NMR spectrum was acquired in a single scan. Spectra were processed using Lorentzian broadening (LB = 5 Hz).
Hyper-CEST MRI.
For the Hyper-CEST MRI experiment, 16 on-resonant and 16 off-resonant scans were acquired and averaged. The image was acquired using a RARE sequence (slice thickness = 30 mm, matrix size = 32 × 32, field of view = 30 × 30 mm2, in-plane resolution = 0.9375 × 0.9375 mm2, bandwidth = 5,400 Hz, echo time = 4.97 ms, repetition time = 82.3 ms, centric k-space encoding, no partial Fourier transform acceleration, rare factor = 8). For each excitation, the Xe gas mixture was bubbled into solution for a period of time (20 s), followed by a delay time (3 s) to allow the bubbles to collapse. After that, a saturation pulse (13 µT, 5 s) was applied to saturate the Xe in the ZIF-8 pores (−109 ppm, relative to dissolved Xe in solution at 0 ppm) or off resonance (109 ppm, relative to dissolved Xe in solution at 0 ppm). Then, the image was acquired. The MR images were processed on MATLAB (R2014a; MathWorks). The image matrix 32 × 32 was interpolated into a 128 × 128 image matrix. Hyper-CEST effect for on-resonant saturation was analyzed compared to off-resonant saturation for each pixel by the formula (CEST effect = (Intensityoff-Intensityon)/Intensityoff) point by point.
Supporting Information.
SI Appendix contains details of the synthesis, DLS analysis, electron microscopy images, PXRD, TGA, N2 adsorption analysis, and hyperpolarized 129Xe NMR/MRI data.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge support by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0704000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81625011, 91859206, 21921004, and 21971199), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDBS-LY-JSC004 and QYZDY-SSW-SLH018), Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2017CFA013), and General and Special Financial Grant from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M622500). X. Zhou acknowledges the support from the Tencent Foundation through the XPLORER PRIZE. We thank Dr. Haoqing Jiang and Ms. Wei Yan for invaluable discussions and Prof. David E. Wemmer (University of California, Berkeley) for his valuable suggestions and editing.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2004121117/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability.
Additional data are available in SI Appendix.
References
- 1.Albert M. S. et al., Biological magnetic resonance imaging using laser-polarized 129Xe. Nature 370, 199–201 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ebert M. et al., Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarised helium-3. Lancet 347, 1297–1299 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cleveland Z. I. et al., Hyperpolarized 83Kr MRI of lungs. J. Magn. Reson. 195, 232–237 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhou X. et al., MRI of stroke using hyperpolarized 129Xe. NMR Biomed. 24, 170–175 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Doganay O. et al., Time-series hyperpolarized xenon-129 MRI of lobar lung ventilation of COPD in comparison to V/Q-SPECT/CT and CT. Eur. Radiol. 29, 4058–4067 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang J. M. et al., Using hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI to quantify regional gas transfer in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax 73, 21–28 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhou X., Graziani D., Pines A., Hyperpolarized xenon NMR and MRI signal amplification by gas extraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 16903–16906 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mugler J. P. 3rd et al., Simultaneous magnetic resonance imaging of ventilation distribution and gas uptake in the human lung using hyperpolarized xenon-129. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 21707–21712 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Spence M. M. et al., Functionalized xenon as a biosensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 10654–10657 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hilty C., Lowery T. J., Wemmer D. E., Pines A., Spectrally resolved magnetic resonance imaging of a xenon biosensor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 45, 70–73 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chambers J. M. et al., Cryptophane xenon-129 nuclear magnetic resonance biosensors targeting human carbonic anhydrase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 563–569 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rose H. M. et al., Development of an antibody-based, modular biosensor for 129Xe NMR molecular imaging of cells at nanomolar concentrations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 11697–11702 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kotera N. et al., A doubly responsive probe for the detection of Cys4-tagged proteins. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 51, 11482–11484 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang S. et al., Hyperpolarized 129Xe magnetic resonance imaging sensor for H2S. Chemistry 23, 7648–7652 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zeng Q. et al., Mitochondria targeted and intracellular biothiol triggered hyperpolarized 129Xe magnetofluorescent biosensor. Anal. Chem. 89, 2288–2295 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schröder L., Lowery T. J., Hilty C., Wemmer D. E., Pines A., Molecular imaging using a targeted magnetic resonance hyperpolarized biosensor. Science 314, 446–449 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tyagi R., Witte C., Haag R., Schröder L., Dendronized cryptophanes as water-soluble xenon hosts for (129)Xe magnetic resonance imaging. Org. Lett. 16, 4436–4439 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Delacour L. et al., “Clickable” hydrosoluble PEGylated cryptophane as a universal platform for 129Xe magnetic resonance imaging biosensors. Chemistry 19, 6089–6093 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Park K. S. et al., Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 10186–10191 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang X. C., Lin Y. Y., Zhang J. P., Chen X. M., Ligand-directed strategy for zeolite-type metal-organic frameworks: zinc(II) imidazolates with unusual zeolitic topologies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 45, 1557–1559 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhou H. C., Long J. R., Yaghi O. M., Introduction to metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 112, 673–674 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Deng H. et al., Large-pore apertures in a series of metal-organic frameworks. Science 336, 1018–1023 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Deng H. et al., Multiple functional groups of varying ratios in metal-organic frameworks. Science 327, 846–850 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kong X. et al., Mapping of functional groups in metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 882–885 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pei C., Ben T., Li Y., Qiu S., Synthesis of copolymerized porous organic frameworks with high gas storage capabilities at both high and low pressures. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 50, 6134–6136 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Banerjee R. et al., High-throughput synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and application to CO2 capture. Science 319, 939–943 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Du L. et al., Fine-tuning pore size by shifting coordination sites of ligands and surface polarization of metal-organic frameworks to sharply enhance the selectivity for CO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 562–565 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen X. et al., Direct observation of Xe and Kr adsorption in a Xe-selective microporous metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 7007–7010 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Feng X. et al., Kr/Xe separation over a chabazite zeolite membrane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 9791–9794 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liao P. Q., Huang N. Y., Zhang W. X., Zhang J. P., Chen X. M., Controlling guest conformation for efficient purification of butadiene. Science 356, 1193–1196 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Peng S. et al., Metal-organic frameworks for precise inclusion of single-stranded DNA and transfection in immune cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 1293 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ma Y. et al., H2S-activable MOF nanoparticle photosensitizer for effective photodynamic therapy against cancer with controllable singlet-oxygen release. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 56, 13752–13756 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dong Z., Sun Y., Chu J., Zhang X., Deng H., Multivariate metal-organic frameworks for dialing-in the binding and programming the release of drug molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 14209–14216 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pawsey S. et al., Hyperpolarized 129Xe nuclear magnetic resonance studies of isoreticular metal-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 6060–6067 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Springuel-Huet M.-A. et al., 129Xe NMR study of the framework flexibility of the porous hybrid MIL-53(Al). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 11599–11607 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hoffmann H. C. et al., High-pressure in situ 129Xe NMR spectroscopy and computer simulations of breathing transitions in the metal-organic framework Ni2(2,6-ndc)2(dabco) (DUT-8(Ni)). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 8681–8690 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen Y. Z. et al., Location determination of metal nanoparticles relative to a metal-organic framework. Nat. Commun. 10, 3462 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kunth M., Witte C., Hennig A., Schröder L., Identification, classification, and signal amplification capabilities of high-turnover gas binding hosts in ultra-sensitive NMR. Chem. Sci. (Camb.) 6, 6069–6075 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shapiro M. G. et al., Genetically encoded reporters for hyperpolarized xenon magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Chem. 6, 629–634 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stevens T. K., Ramirez R. M., Pines A., Nanoemulsion contrast agents with sub-picomolar sensitivity for xenon NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 9576–9579 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang Y., Roose B. W., Palovcak E. J., Carnevale V., Dmochowski I. J., A genetically encoded β-lactamase reporter for ultrasensitive 129Xe NMR in mammalian cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 8984–8987 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Roukala J. et al., Encapsulation of xenon by a self-assembled Fe4L6 metallosupramolecular cage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 2464–2467 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ooms K. J., Wasylishen R. E., 129Xe NMR study of xenon in iso-reticular metal-organic frameworks. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 103, 341–351 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schröder L. et al., Temperature response of 129Xe depolarization transfer and its application for ultrasensitive NMR detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 257603 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Huber G. et al., Cryptophane-xenon complexes in organic solvents observed through NMR spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 11363–11372 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schilling F. et al., MRI thermometry based on encapsulated hyperpolarized xenon. ChemPhysChem 11, 3529–3533 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ito T., Fraissard J., 129Xe NMR study of xenon adsorbed on Y zeolites. J. Chem. Phys. 76, 5225–5229 (1982). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bunzen H. et al., Achieving large volumetric gas storage capacity in metal-organic frameworks by kinetic trapping: A case study of xenon loading in MFU-4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 10191–10197 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kemnitzer T. W., Tschense C. B. L., Wittmann T., Rössler E. A., Senker J., Exploring local disorder within CAU-1 frameworks using hyperpolarized 129Xe NMR spectroscopy. Langmuir 34, 12538–12548 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Additional data are available in SI Appendix.