Triazolopyridopyrimidine: A New Scaffold for Dual-Target Small Molecules for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is multifactorial disease characterized by the accumulation of abnormal extracellular deposits of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide, and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), along with dramatic neuronal death and decreased levels of choline acetyltransferase. Given the limited therapeutic success of available drugs, it is urgent to explore all the opportunities available to combat this illness. Among them, the discovery of new heterocyclic scaffolds binding different receptors involved in AD should offer structural diversity and new therapeutic solutions. In this context, this work describes new triazolopyridopyrimidine easily prepared in good yields showing anticholinesterase inhibition and strong antioxidant power, particularly the most balanced: 6-amino-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6] pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile(3c) with IC₅₀ equal to 1.32 μM against AChE and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) value equal to 4.01 Trolox equivalents (TE); thus representing a new and very promising hit-triazolopyridopyrimidine for AD therapy.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder and the most common form of senile dementia, and constitutes one of the major public health problems, mainly due to the increasing old population in developed countries [1,2]. AD is characterized by the progressive loss of cognitive abilities that gradually leads to the physical and mental impairment of patients who eventually die as a consequence of secondary complications associated with the disease, such as pneumopathies, septicemia, infected bedsores or stroke [3]. AD is a multifactorial pathology characterized by two principal hallmarks: the accumulation of abnormal extracellular deposits of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide, and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), along with dramatic neuronal death and decreased levels of choline acetyltransferase [4]. Oxidative stress and imbalances in the homeostasis of biometals such as Cu, Fe or Zn [5,6,7] constitute other prominent features of AD pathogenesis. Current AD pharmacotherapy focuses mainly on the impairment of cholinergic and glutamatergic systems, the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors donepezil [8], galantamine [9], rivastigmine [8] and memantine, a N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist [8,10], being the only clinically administered drugs, albeit with limited therapeutic success. In view of this situation, new strategies have been promoted based on the multitarget small molecules (MSM) approach [11] for the development of new drugs able to bind simultaneously diverse enzymatic systems or receptors involved in AD pathology [11,12,13,14,15]. Following this paradigm, we developed a number of new MSM [16,17,18] based on azaheterocycle scaffolds. In fact, nitrogen containing heterocycles have been widely used in medicinal chemistry these last years to find new bioactive molecules for AD [19,20,21].

In this context, triazole-containing derivatives have attracted great interest in searching new hit-compounds for AD, as they may display promising in vitro and in vivo AD activities and might be able to prevent drug resistance to certain extent [20,22,23]. Pyridopyrimidines, which are nitrogen bioisosteres of quinoxaline, are associated with a diverse range of biological activities, such as central nervous system (CNS) disorders [24], and constitute a promising scaffold to develop bioactive molecules for AD.

Continuing with our contributions to this area, by using the antioxidant approach associated with cholinesterase (ChE) inhibition based on a new scaffold, we describe here the synthesis of 11 new molecules by combining a triazole ring with a pyridopyrimidine core as well as their cholinesterase inhibition and antioxidant power. Among the 11 synthetized compounds, we identified 6-amino-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimi-dine-4-carbonitrile (3c) as the most balanced triazolopyridopyrimidine, exhibiting micromolar inhibition of AChE with IC₅₀ equal to 1.32 μM and strong antioxidant activity, representing, thus, a new and very promising hit-triazolopyridopyrimidine for AD therapy.

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis

The synthesis of the new triazolopyridopyrimidine 3a–k has been carried out in a short synthetic procedure as depicted in Scheme 1, in good overall yields, by reacting 2-(5-phenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)acetonitrile (1), synthesized from 2-cyanoacetohydrazide and ethyl benzimidate in ethanol at reflux, with the appropriate aldehyde and malonitrile, as reported [25], to afford 5-amino-2-diphenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine-6,8-dicarbonitriles 2, followed by treatment with formamide at reflux for 1 h.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of triazolopyridopyrimidine 3a–k.

All new triazolopyridopyrimidines showed excellent analytical and spectroscopic data, in good agreement with the expected values (see Section 3 and Supplementary Material). The structure of compound 3a was also confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 1)

Figure 1.

ORTEP (Oak Ridge Thermal-Ellipsoid Plot Program) plot of the X-ray crystal structure of triazolopyridopyrimidine 3a.

2.2. Biological Evaluation

The new compounds were then submitted to antioxidant capacity analysis and cholinesterase inhibition.

2.2.1. Antioxidant Analysis

The ability of triazolopyridopyrimidines 3a–k to reduce the amount of peroxyl radicals was determined by the oxygen radical absorbance capacity by fluorescence (ORAC-FL) method [26,27] using fluorescein (FL) as the fluorescent probe, and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-chroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) as standard compound. Results were expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents (TE). Melatonin and ferulic acid were used as positive controls, showing ORAC values equal to 2.4 and 3.7 TE, respectively, which fully agree with the values previously described for them [28,29]. As shown in Table 1, all compounds presented a good ability to reduce a peroxyl radical. The ORAC values ranged between 1.77 (3b) and 7.17 (3g), and seven compounds (3c–e, 3g–h, 3j–k) showed ORAC values higher than melatonin, whereas three of them (3c–e) were more potent than ferulic acid. Concerning the structure activity relationship, the most potent antioxidant triazolopyridopyrimidine is 3g, which bears an hydroxyl group as a substituent at the phenyl ring. Triazolopyridopyrimidines 3c–e, bearing methoxy groups as substituents at the phenyl ring, and 3h exhibiting a nitro group, are moderate antioxidants. The phenoxy group present in compound 3k confers weaker antioxidant activity, while methyl (3b), chlorine (3f), and isopropyl (3i) groups do not seem to favor the antioxidant effect, as well as the absence of the substituent as in triazolopyridopyrimidine 3a.

Table 1.

Inhibition percentages for triazolopyridopyrimidines 3a–k at 10 μM against EeAChE and their oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) (Trolox equivalents, TE) values.

Compound	R1	R2	R3	ORAC a (TE)	% Inhibition of EeAChE b at 10 μM	IC50 (μM) c
3a	H	H	H	1.85 ± 0.1	40.27 ± 2.4	nd
3b	H	CH3	H	1.77 ± 0.1	73.13 ± 0.1	1.17 ± 0.0
3c	H	OCH3	H	4.01 ± 0.1	63.93 ± 1.8	1.32 ± 0.0
3d	OCH3	H	H	4.33 ± 0.1	31.23 ± 2.1	nd
3e	H	H	OCH3	3.79 ± 0.1	32.33 ± 2.4	nd
3f	H	Cl	H	1.81 ± 0.1	43.90 ± 1.2	nd
3g	H	OH	H	7.17 ± 0.2	36.43 ± 0.6	nd
3h	H	NO2	H	3.54 ± 0.1	44.63 ± 1.6	nd
3i	H	iPr	H	1.89 ± 0.1	18.17 ± 1	nd
3j	H	Br	H	2.57 ± 0.0	38.13 ± 1.1	nd
3k	H	OPh	H	2.99 ± 0.2	18.60 ± 1.8	nd
Melatonin	-	-	-	2.45 ± 0.1	-	-
Ferulic acid	-	-	-	3.74 ± 0.2	-	-
Tacrine	-	-	-		95.63 ± 2.1	0.03 ± 0.0

^a Data are expressed as Trolox equivalents and are the mean (n = 3) ± SEM. ^b Every percentage value is the mean of a triple of at least two different experiments. ^c Each IC₅₀ value is the mean ± SEM of a quadruplicate of at least three different experiments; nd: not determined.

2.2.2. Inhibition of EeAChE/eqBuChE

For the ChE inhibition experiments we used the cheap and easily available EeAChE and eqBuChE, tacrine as reference, and the Ellman protocol for the determination of the inhibitory potency [30]. All triazolopyridopyrimidines showed a very weak inhibition against BuChE at 10 μM. However, the percentage of inhibition at 10 μM against AChE ranged from 18.17 for 3i to 73.13 for 3b (Table 1). The IC₅₀ was then evaluated for compounds 3b and 3c showing percentages of inhibition at 10 μM higher than 50%. Interestingly these two compounds exhibited an IC₅₀ equal to 1.17 μM and 1.32 μM, respectively, only 39- and 44-fold less active than tacrine (IC₅₀ = 0.03 μM) [31,32].

2.3. Molecular Modeling

To explore the possible binding mode of triazolopyridopyrimidines 3a–k at EeAChE, docking studies were performed for the most promising triazolopyridopyrimidine, 3c, using AutoDock Vina software [33].

The importance of the role of the protonation state in the ligand-receptor recognition and binding is well known, and consequently, the determination of ligand protonation states was carried out before docking. For compounds 3a–k, the protonated states were computationally predicted at physiological pH. Accordingly, two protonation states were analyzed: protonation of N3 of the triazole ring giving rise to a monoprotonated compound 3c.H⁺ and a diprotonated state 3c.2H⁺² as a result of the diprotonation of the N3 and N9 of the pyrimidine ring (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Protonated states of triazolopyridopyrimidine 3c at physiological pH.

Ligand docking studies were performed on the crystal structure of EeAChE taken from Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 1C2B, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Docking procedure allows the docking of ligands on the entire protein surface, without prior specification of the binding site (blind docking). The recognition process between ligands and protein was theoretically investigated by flexible docking experiments. At the stage of protein orientation, flexibility in protein structure plays a central role and that is why we usually introduce protein flexibility into the docking procedure. In this case four selected side-chains—Trp286, Tyr124, Tyr337, and Tyr72—were allowed to change their conformations at the same time as the ligand being docked. In this way the access of bulky ligands, such as triazolopyridopyrimidine 3c, to the catalytic site can be facilitated. Inhibitors were analyzed on the basis of their affinity energy and type of interactions that they made with protein residues.

The visualization of 3c.H⁺ inside EeAChE enzyme revealed several important interactions. This triazolopyridopyrimidine simultaneously occupied both the catalytic anionic site (CAS) and peripheral anionic subsite (PAS) of AChE (Figure 3). The methoxybenzene ring was located at the CAS through carbon hydrogen interaction with the amino acid of the catalytic triad, His447. Additionally, the methoxybenzene ring formed a π-π stacked interaction with Phe338 and a T-shaped interaction with Tyr341 (Figure 4). In the middle of the gorge, the amino acids, Tyr341 and Tyr124, were also observed to form π-π stacked and T-shaped interactions with fused-rings part of the envisioned triazolopyridopyrimidine. The triazolopyridopyrimidine moiety forms a stable network of hydrogen bonding between the protonated N3 and N9 with Tyr124 and Phe295, respectively (Figure 4). The phenyl ring is located in the pocket forming PAS interacting with Tyr72 and Trp286 via face-to-face and edge-to-face π-π interactions, respectively. In this situation, Trp286 also established a hydrogen bond with a pyrimidine nitrogen. The protonated triazole moiety interacted with Asp74, in PAS, via salt bridge interaction (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Binding mode of inhibitor 3c.H⁺ within the active site of EeAChE (binding affinity: –11.5 kcal/mol). Compound 3c.H⁺ is illustrated in red. Ligand is rendered as ball and sticks and the side chain conformations of the mobile residues are illustrated in the same color as the ligand. Catalytic triad amino acids (CT) are in green, anionic sub-site (AS) in orange, acyl binding pocket (ABP) in yellow, and peripheral anionic subsite (PAS) in light red, and color coded.

Figure 4.

Schematic 2D representation of interactions of 3c.H⁺ with EeAChE.

For compounds 3a.H⁺–3k.H⁺ AutoDock Vina runs resulted in binding energy scores that ranged from −8.7 to −12.1 kcal/mol. Although there was no exact correlation between docking score and inhibitory activity, we found some correlation between experimental activities and computational binding energies. Among the 11 triazolopyridopyrimidines, the less active compounds, 3i.H⁺ and 3k.H⁺, showed the highest binding energy values at −8.7 and −9.6 kcal/mol, respectively. The most active compound was found to be 3b.H⁺ and it exhibited the lowest dock score of −12.1 kcal/mol. The second most active compound, 3c.H⁺, exhibited a dock score of −11.5 kcal/mol. The rest of the compounds (3a.H⁺, 3d.H⁺–3h.H⁺, and 3j.H⁺) have shown binding energy scores that ranged from −9.6 to −11.5 kcal/mol, but correlation with percentage of inhibition seems hard to establish.

Triazolopyridopyrimidine 3c.2H⁺² is bound to the EeAChE active site in similar fashion as 3c.H⁺, with a binding affinity of −10.4 kcal/mol. As shown in Figure 5, triazolopyridopyrimidine 3c.2H⁺² is located in the entire enzymatic gorge. Docking simulations showed a clear preference to accommodate the pyrimidine and methoxyphenyl moieties within the PAS. The phenyl ring is embedded in the binding pocket forming the CAS, with the pyridotriazole moiety lying in the middle of the gorge between the CAS and PAS. In the complex, the phenyl ring points towards the catalytic triad residues (His447, Ser203, and Glu334) and interacts via van der Waals interactions with His447. It was also found that this ring forms π-π T-shaped and π-stacked interactions with Trp86 and Tyr337 (Figure 5 and Figure 6).

Figure 5.

Binding mode of inhibitor 3c.2H⁺² (blue) at the active site of EeAChE. Ligand is rendered as ball and sticks, and the side chain conformations of the mobile residues are illustrated in the same color as the ligand. Catalytic triad (CT) is colored in green, anionic sub-site (AS) in orange, acyl binding pocket (ABP) in yellow, and peripheral anionic subsite (PAS) in light blue, and color coded.

Figure 6.

Schematic 2D representation of different interactions of 3c.2H⁺² at EeAChE.

The methoxyphenyl moiety facilitates π-π T-shaped interaction with the side chain of Trp286 from the PAS at the gorge opening (Figure 6). Similarly, the pyrimidine and pyridine motifs provide π-π stacked interactions with Trp286. Furthermore, the triazolopyridopyrimidine moiety provides π-π stacked interactions with Tyr341. In addition, protonated nitrogen facilitates salt bridge and π-cation interactions with Asp74 and Tyr341. Finally, three hydrogen bond interactions with Tyr124 and Phe295 strengthen the protein–ligand interaction (Figure 6).

The most stable conformation generated through the docking studies for both 3c.H⁺ and 3c.2H⁺² showed that these ligands occupy the same spatial region in the AChE enzyme, but the arrangement of the three-ring system is different. They share the position of the central core of the ligands (pyridine moieties) and this implies that the phenyl moiety of 3c.2H⁺² occupies a similar position as the methoxyphenyl moiety of the 3c.H⁺ (Figure 7). The binding modes place the ligands interacting with both the PAS and the CAS.

Figure 7.

Superposition of bioactive conformations for 3c.H⁺ (red) and 3c.2H⁺² (blue).

3. Materials and Methods

All reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Melting points were determined on a Kofler apparatus (Wagner Munz, München, Germany). Progress of the reactions was monitored with Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using aluminum sheets with silica gel 60 F254 from Merck (Kenilworth, NJ, USA). ¹H and ¹³C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker spectrometer, operating at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, using DMSO-d₆ as solvent. The chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm), using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal reference. The multiplicities of the signals are indicated by the following abbreviations: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quadruplet; and m, multiplet; coupling constants are expressed in Hz. Elemental analyses were obtained by a Carlo Erba EA 1108 analyzer and the analytical results were within ± 0.2% of the theoretical values for all compounds.

3.1. Synthesis of Compounds 3a–k

In a typical experiment, a solution of 5-amino-2-diphenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine-6,8-dicarbonitrile (0.01 mol) and formamide (7 mL, Aldrich, St. Quentin Fallavier, France) was heated under reflux for 1 h. The solid product formed by cooling was filtered, washed with water and ethyl acetate, and dried. Following this protocol, it was possible to synthesize 6-amino-5-(aryl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6] pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile 1–11 with good yields.

6-Amino-2,5-diphenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3a, Rdt = (76%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 8.70 (s, 1H), 8.57 (s, 1H, NH), 8.29–8.29 (m, 2H), 7.76–7.73 (m, 3H), 7.65 (m, 2H), 7.61–7.59 (m,3H), 4.90 (s, 1H, NH), ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.5, 162.3, 160.4,150.6, 149.8, 149.6, 135.2, 131.3, 131.2, 130.4, 130.0, 129.6, 128.6, 127.6, 114.4, 99.9, 98.9. Anal. Calcd: for C₂₁H₁₅N₇: C, 69.03; H, 4.14; N, 26.83 found: C, 69.75; H, 3.58; N, 26.67.

6-Amino-2-phenyl-5-(p-tolyl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3b, Rdt = (74%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 8.67 (s,1H), 8.54 (s, 1H, NH), 8.27 (d, J = 3,2 Hz, 2H), 7.58–7.47 (m, 7H), 4.98 (s, 1H, NH), 2.48 (s, 3H, CH₃), ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.4, 162.4, 160.4, 150.5, 150.0, 149.4, 141.0, 132.3, 131.3, 131.0, 130.0, 129.6, 128.5, 127.6, 114.4, 100.0, 98.0, 21.5 Anal. Calcd: for C₂₂H₁₇N₇ C, 69.64; H, 4.52; N, 25.84 found: C, 69.85; H, 4.08; N, 26.07.

6-Amino-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3c, Rdt = (75%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 8.66 (s,1H), 8.54 (s, 1H, NH), 8.27 (2H, d, J = 6,9 Hz), 7.59–7.57 (m, 5H), 7.29–7.26 (d, 2H, J = 6,9 Hz), 5.09 (s, 1H, NH), 3.91 (3H, s, OCH₃), ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.4, 162.4, 161.3, 160.3, 150.6, 149.9, 149.4, 131.3, 130.3, 130.0, 129.6, 127.6, 126.8, 115.8, 114.5, 100.1, 99.0, 55.9. Anal. Calcd: for C₂₂H₁₇N₇O C, 66.82; H, 4.33; N, 24.80; found: C, 67.44; H, 3.85; N, 24.70.

6-Amino-5-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3d, Rdt = (73%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 8.67 (s, 1H), 8.57 (s, 1H, NH), 8.36–8.26 (m, 2H), 7.71–7.31 (m, 7H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.5, 162.4, 160.4, 156.1,150.6,149.5,147.0, 133.5, 131.3, 130.0, 129.9, 129.6, 127.6,123.2, 122.4, 114.3, 113.4, 100.1, 99.1, 56.6 Anal. Calcd: for C₂₂H₁₇N₇O: C, 66.82; H, 4.33; N, 24.80; found: C, 67.26; H, 3.79; N, 25.15.

6-Amino-5-(2-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3e, Rdt = (70%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 8.69 (s,1H), 8.55 (s,1H, NH), 8.27–8.29 (m, 2H), 7.71–7.75(m, 1H), 7.56 (m, 4H), 7.39–7.42 (m, 1H,), 7.29–7.32 (m, 1H), 5.2 (s,1H, NH), 3.81 (s, 3H, OCH₃), ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.5, 162.5, 160.4, 156.1, 150.6,149.5,147.0, 133.5, 131.3, 130.1, 130.0, 129.6, 127.6,123.3, 122.4, 114.3, 113.4, 100.1, 99.2, 56.6 Anal. Calcd: for C₂₂H₁₇N₇O: C, 66.82; H, 4.33; N, 24.80; O, 4.05 found: C, 67.47; H, 3.88; N, 25.08.

6-Amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3f, Rdt = (74%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 8.70 (s,1H), 8.54 (s, 1H, NH), 8.29 (m, 2H), 7.81 (m, 1H,), 7.69–7.56 (m, 6H), 5.19 (s,1H, NH), ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.5, 162.3, 160.3,150.6,149.6,148.8,136.1, 133.8, 131.4, 130.9,130.5, 130.0, 129.6, 127.6, 114.2, 99.8, 99.0. Anal. Calcd: for C₂₁H₁₄ClN₇: C, 63.08; H, 3.53; N, 24.52 found: C, 63.57; H, 3.01; N, 24.58.

6-Amino-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3g, Rdt = (69%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 10.27 (s, 1H,OH) 8.66 (s, 1H), 8.54 (s, 1H, NH), 8.30–8.25 (m, 2H), 7.57–7.54 (m, 3H), 7.43 (d, J = 8,3 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (d, J = 8,3 Hz, 2H), 5.15 (s, 1H, NH) ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.4, 162.5, 160.3, 159.9, 150.6,150.4,149.4, 131.3, 130.2,130.0,129.6, 127.6,125.1, 117.1, 114.6, 100.2, 99.0 Anal. Calcd: for C₂₁H₁₅N₇O: C, 66.13; H, 3.96; N, 25.71; O, 4.19 found: C, 66.59; H, 3.43; N, 25.95.

6-Amino-5-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3h, Rdt = (71%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 8.68 (s, 1H), 8.42 (s, 1H, NH), 8.27 (s, 1H), 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 8,1 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (m, 5H), 5.12(s, 1H,NH), ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.5, 162.4, 160.7, 160.3, 150.6,149.6,149.5, 140.5, 131.3, 130.0, 129.6, 129.5, 129.4, 127.6, 120.5, 114.4, 99.9, 99.0. Anal. Calcd: for C₂₁H₁₂N₈O₂: C, 61.76; H, 2.96; N, 27.44 found C, 61.67; H, 3.01; N, 27.38.

6-Amino-5-(4-isopropylphenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3i, Rdt = (76%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 8.68 (s, 1H), 8.51 (s, 1H, NH), 8.30 (m, 2H), 7.63–7.55 (m, 7H), 5.93(s, 1H,NH), 3.07(m, 1H, CH), 1.32(s, 3H, CH3), 1.30(s, 3H,CH3), ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.5, 162.4, 160.4, 151.7, 150.6, 150.0, 149.5, 132.6, 131.3,130.0,129.6, 128.6,128.3, 127.6, 124.9, 114.5, 100.0, 98.9, 33.8, 24.1. Anal. Calcd: for C₂₄H₁₉N₇:C, 71.09; H, 4.72; N, 24.18 found C, 70.67; H, 4.61; N, 24.26.

6-Amino-5-(4-bromophenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3j: Rdt = (74%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 8.67 (s, 1H), 8.49 (s, 1H, NH), 8.26–8.28 (m, 2H), 7.93–7.95 (d, J = 8,4 Hz, 2H), 7.60 7.63(d, J = 8,4 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (m, 3H), 5.16 (s, 1H, NH), ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.5, 162.2, 160.3, 150.5, 150.6, 1549.5, 148.7, 134.2, 133,4, 131.4, 131.0, 129.9, 129.6, 127.6, 124.9, 114.3, 99.7, 98.9. Anal. Calcd: for C₂₁H₁₂BrN₇: C, 57.03; H, 2.73; Br, 18.07; N, 22.17 found C, 57.89; H, 2.68; N, 22.23.

6-Amino-5-(4-phenoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile3k, Rdt = (67%); mp > 260 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 8.65 (s, 1H), 8.53 (s, 1H, NH), 8.26 (s, 2H), 7.66 (m, 2H), 7.56 (s, 2H), 7.52–7.49 (m, 2H), 7.33–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.19 (m, 3H), 5.20(s, 1H,NH), ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSOd₆) δ 164.4, 162.3, 160.3, 159.8, 155.8, 150.5, 149.5, 130.9, 130.8, 130.7, 130.0, 129.5, 129.3, 127.6, 125.0, 120.1, 119.9, 119.4, 114.4, 99.9, 99.0. Anal. Calcd: for C₂₇H₁₇N₇O: C, 71.20; H, 3.76; N, 21.53; O, 3.51 found C, 70.99; H, 3.81; N, 21.66.

3.2. Biological Evaluation

3.2.1. Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity Assay

The antioxidant activity of compounds 3a–k was carried out by ORAC-FL using fluorescein as a fluorescent probe. Briefly, fluorescein and antioxidant were incubated in a black 96-well microplate (Nunc) for 15 min at 37 °C. 2,2′-Azobis(amidinopropane) dihydrochloride was then added quickly using the built-in injector of Varioskan Flash plate reader (Thermo Scientific). The fluorescence was measured at 485 nm (excitation wavelength) and 535 nm (emission wavelength) each min for 1 h. All the reactions were made in triplicate and at least three different assays were performed for each sample.

3.2.2. Inhibition of EeAChE and eqBuChE

The effect of the test compounds on the activity of both EeAChE and eqBuChE was evaluated following the spectrophotometric method of Ellman [30]. The reaction occurred in a final volume of 3 mL of a 0.1 M phosphate-buffered solution at pH = 8.0, containing 5,5′-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB, 2625 µL, 0.35 mM, final concentration), EeAChE (29 µL, 0.035 U/mL, final concentration) or eqBuChE (60 µL, 0.05 U/mL, final concentration), tested compound (3 µL, 0.001–1000 nM, final concentrations), and 1% w/v bovine albumin serum phosphate-buffered (pH = 8) solution (BSA, 60 µL). After this pre-incubation period, acetylthiocholine iodide (105 µL, 0.35 mM, final concentration) or butyrylthiocholine iodide (150 µL, 0.5 mM, final concentration) was added, allowing 15 min of additional incubation time. For IC₅₀, inhibition curves were built by pre-incubating this blend at room temperature with nine concentrations of each compound for 10 min.

3.2.3. Molecular Modeling

To carry out docking simulations, the starting ligand geometries for compounds 3c.H⁺ and (3c.2H)²⁺ were built with Discovery Studio (DS, San Diego, CA, USA), version 2.1, software package and then protonated at pH 7.4. The resulting molecules were subsequently minimized using the adopted-based Newton–Rapson algorithm. Structure was considered fully optimized when the energy changes between interactions were less than 0.01 kcal/mol [34]. The coordinates of EeAChE (PDB:1C2B) were obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The structure was initially processed by “prepare protein” module in DS, to give the structure suitable for docking. Missed side chains of the protein were added and the water molecules were removed; later the structure was protonated at pH 7.4. AutoDockTools (ADT; version 1.5.4, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to add hydrogens and partial charges for proteins and ligands using Gasteiger charges. Flexible torsions in the ligands were assigned with the AutoTors module, and the acyclic dihedral angles were allowed to rotate freely. Docking runs were carried out allowing the rotation of Trp286, Tyr124, Tyr337, and Tyr72 receptor residues, using the AutoTors module.

Ligand–protein docking was conducted using the program Autodock Vina [33]. The box center was defined, and the docking box was displayed using ADT. The docking procedure was applied to the whole protein target, without imposing the binding site (“blind docking”). The coordinates of the grid box were as follows: x = 21.5911, y = 87.752, and z = −23.591. The grid dimensions were as follows: x = 60, y = 60, and z = 72, using a spacing of 1 Ǻ, and a num_modes of 40. The top ranked conformations for each docked compound were retained and visually inspected for binding pattern analysis, which was visualized and depicted in DS software.

4. Conclusions

AD is a neurodegenerative disorder and the most common form of senile dementia. The four current AD pharmacotherapies focus on the impairment of cholinergic and glutamatergic, but with limited therapeutic success. Therefore, it is urgent to explore all the opportunities in order to combat this illness, such as the discovery of new heterocyclic scaffolds binding with different receptors involved in AD to offer more structural diversity and new solutions in this field. For this purpose, in this work we developed new triazolopyridopyrimidines easily prepared in three steps in good yields showing antioxidant activity and inhibition of AChE. As a result, we identified 6-amino-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-carbonitrile (3c) as the most balanced compound showing micromolar inhibition of AChE with IC₅₀ equal to 1.3 μM. Molecular modeling of monoprotonated and diprotonated states of 3c revealed several important interactions with AChE and showed that 3c.H⁺ simultaneously occupied both the CAS and PAS of AChE while 3c.2H²⁺ bound principally at active site and was located in the entire enzymatic gorge. This new type of heterocycle, and particularly triazolopyridopyrimidine 3c, constitute very promising findings that deserve further investigation for AD. Work is now in progress in our laboratories to develop analogues with the best pharmacological profile by exploring the impact to introduce different substituents on the aromatic ring attached to the triazolo core. The investigation of the activities of these new compounds as inhibitors of Aβ self-aggregation will be explored too. The results will be reported in due course.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online: NMR spectra of compounds 3a–k.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C.; methodology, L.I., I.I. and J.M.-C. Investigation, L.Z., I.P.-A., Ò.M.B.-A., D.D.-I. and I.I.; resources, L.I. and F.C.; writing—original draft preparation, L.I. writing—review and editing, J.M.-C.; supervision, L.I.; funding acquisition, L.I and F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the MuTaLig (CA15135) COST action. This work was supported by the Regional Council of Franche-Comté (2016YC-04540 and 04560).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.