Abstract
The novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus that emerged in the city of Wuhan, China, last year has since become the COVID-19 pandemic across all continents. To restrict the spread of the virus pandemic, the Government of India imposed a lockdown from 25 March 2020. In India, Kannur district was identified as the first “hotspot” of virus transmission and a “triple-lockdown” was implemented for a span of twenty days from 20 April 2020. This article highlights the variations of surface O3, NO, NO2, CO, SO2, NH3, VOC’s, PM10, PM2.5 and meteorological parameters at the time of pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days at Kannur town in south India using ground-based analyzers. From pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days, surface O3 concentration was found to increase by 22% in this VOC limited environment. NO and NO2 concentrations were decreased by 61% and 71% respectively. The concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 were observed to decline significantly by 61% and 53% respectively. Reduction in PM10 during lockdown and triple-lockdown days enhanced the intensity of solar radiation reaching the lower troposphere, and increased air temperature and reduced the relative humidity. Owing to this, surface O3 production over Kannur was found to have increased during triple-lockdown days. The concentration of CO (67%), VOCs (61%), SO2 (62%) and NH3 (16%) were found to decrease significantly from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. The air quality index revealed that the air quality at the observational site was clean during the lockdown.
Keywords: COVID-19, Lockdown, Kannur, Air pollutants, Air quality
Introduction
Air pollution is a major environmental issue that affects people in developed and developing countries alike. Particulate matters (PM10 and PM2.5), oxides of nitrogen (NO and NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO) and volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) are the most common atmospheric air pollutants encountered in our daily life (Chen & Kan, 2008; Guo et al., 2019). At the ground level, O3 is a major secondary air pollutant and greenhouse gas, produced from its precursor gases in the presence of solar radiation, and it plays a crucial role in air quality (Yadav et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2018; Ding et al., 2020; Maji, Beig & Yadav, 2020; Resmi et al., 2020). Particulate matters are complex mixture of organic and inorganic substances found in the ambient air, and they play a vital role in the radiation budget of the atmosphere via the scattering and absorption processes (Qu et al., 2017, 2018). The major anthropogenic sources of PM10 and PM2.5 are vehicular emission, industry, building construction, quarrying and mining cement plants, ceramic industries and burning of fossil fuel power plants (Cheng et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2015). Guo et al. (2017) revealed that, in India more than one million people died in 2015 due to particulate matter pollution.
Carbon monoxide is an important trace pollutant that influences the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere, and the concentration of the surface O3 by removing hydroxyl radicals, the primary oxidant in the troposphere (Duncan & Logan, 2008; Yadav et al., 2019a). The main CO sources in the atmosphere are anthropogenic and natural (Lawrence & Lelieveld, 2010). Inhalation of CO is considered very toxic to humans because it can cause acute intoxication (Kinoshita et al., 2020). VOC’s emitted in the atmosphere consist of saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, and halogenated organic compounds (Liu et al., 2008; Montero-Montoya, Lopez-Vargas & Arellano-Aguilar, 2018). These are emitted into the atmosphere by a number of industrial activities such as petrochemical process, storage, distribution, paint, solvent, combustion processes and motor vehicle exhaust (Franco et al., 2015; Yadav et al., 2019b). Isoprene and monoterpenes are another reactive natural VOC’s commonly found in the lower atmosphere, which are mainly emitted by biogenic sources like trees and plants (Fuentes et al., 2000; Menchaca-Torre, Mercado-Hernandez & Mendoza-Domínguez, 2015). These hydrocarbons play a crucial role in the photochemical production of O3 and other oxidants in the lower atmosphere (Atkinson, 2000; Srivastava, Sengupta & Dutta, 2005).
Sulfur dioxide is released into the atmosphere through both natural and anthropogenic emissions. Natural sources are mainly by volcanic eruptions while anthropogenic sources include the combustion of all sulfur containing fuels like oil coal and diesel used for the power generation for industrial activities (Mallik & Lal, 2014; Zhang et al., 2017). Industrial and traffic emissions are the major ammonia (NH3) sources in an urban environment (Pandolfi et al., 2012; Phan et al., 2013).
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus-2 (SARS-CoV2) is the pathogenic agent of Covid-19, a disease first reported from Wuhan Hubei Province of China in December 2019. It was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 11 March 2020 (Al-Qahtani, 2020). The course of the disease is often mild undistinguishable from severe pneumonia which eventually lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death (Lu, Stratton & Tang, 2020). India reported the first confirmed case of coronavirus infection on 30 January 2020 in the southern state of Kerala (Gautam & Hens, 2020). To stop the spread of the virus pandemic, many countries have decided to enforce lockdown measures, even as they caused a severely downturn on the global economy. Subsequently, the Government of India imposed a countrywide lockdown to implement the Break-the-Chain mission to curtail its spread for 21 days in its first phase, and extended up to a second spell of 19 days and a final third phase of 14 days up to May 17 for a total of 54 days. As a result, tightened restrictive measures (i.e., closure all academic institutes, industries, markets, malls and all public places, non-essential businesses, limitation of motorized transports, shut down of Indian railway network, cancelation of inbound and outbound flights) were implemented throughout the nation to impose social distancing.
A substantial enhancement in the air quality in the lockdown period from all over the world were reported. Air pollution in China was significantly reduced as more people quarantined to prevent the social spread of Covid-19 (Dutheil, Baker & Navel, 2020; Muhammad, Long & Salman, 2020; Wang & Su, 2020). Bao & Zhang (2020) reported that the concentrations of SO2, PM2.5, PM10, NO2 and CO over 44 cities in northern China have decreased significantly by 6.76%, 5.93%, 13.66%, 24.67% and 4.58%, respectively due to vehicular restrictions during lockdown period. In addition to these, they conclude that these reduction in air pollutants caused a decrease in air quality index (AQI) by 7.80% over these cities in China. Likewise, Community Multi-scale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) analysis carried out by Wang et al. (2020) found that, PM2.5 concentration over different parts of urban areas in China were significantly reduced in lockdown period. The findings of Shi & Brasseur (2020) showed that particulate matter pollution decreased by an average of 35 percent and nitrogen dioxide decreased by an average of 60 percent in northern China after the lockdowns began on January 23. However, the study found the average surface O3 concentration increased by a factor of 1.5–2 over the same time period. Bauwens et al. (2020) also observed a substantial decrease of NO2 column by 40% over cities in China and 20–38% in Western Europe and USA.
Kanniah et al. (2020) reported that PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2 and CO concentrations were reduced to 26–31%, 23–32%, 63–64%, 9–20% and 25–31%, respectively in urban regions of Malaysia during the lockdown period. Further, they revealed that the restricted industrial activities imposed in lockdown period resulted a reduced concentrations of Aerosol Optical Depth and tropospheric NO2 over East Asian region. There were reports that air pollution was significantly reduced in Barcelona in Spain (Tobías et al., 2020) and European region (Sicard et al., 2020) due to the lockdown to prevent Covid-19 spread. A decline in NO2, NO and an increase in surface O3 was observed at Sao Paulo in Brazil during lockdown period (Dantas et al., 2020; Nakada & Urban, 2020). Air pollution levels have dropped significantly in India due to a massive dip in vehicular movement and industrial activity which have resulted in clean and fresh air (Gautam, 2020; Mahato, Pal & Ghosh, 2020; Sharma et al., 2020).
In the meantime, Kerala state government imposed a “triple-lockdown” in Kannur from 20 April for 20 days after identifying Kannur as a “hotspot” of Covid-19 and declared it a “red” zone in the state. The “triple-lockdown” involved a combination of technology and human surveillance and movement restrictions ple by providing one entry and exit point in all abodes leaving all other roads closed for traffic. People in red zones were not allowed to leave their houses and essential items were made available local authorities through specific requests. Further, guards were deployed to ensure that people in the containment zones stayed indoors during the entire period of the lockdown. During the general lockdown and triple-lockdown periods, the skies over the polluted cities quickly cleared and smelled of fresh air. This offered a rare occasion for investigating how the air pollution levels responded to an extraordinary development.
In this work, we describe the trend in air pollution via monitoring the variations of surface O3, NO and NO2, PM10 and PM2.5, CO, VOC’s including benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylene, o-xylene (collectively called BTEX), SO2, NH3, and meteorological parameters at the time of pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days at Kannur town in the Kerala state of South India.
Methodology
Observational site
Kannur was the British military headquarters on the west coast of India until 1987. Kannur has had its industrial importance from very early days. It was an important trading center of the 12th century with an active business relationship with European and Arab countries. When the state of Kerala was formed in 1957, it was named Kannur town, because administrative offices were established in the district. Kannur is the sixth-most urbanized district in Kerala, with more than 50% of its residents living in urban areas. The district is known for its high level of literacy and health care. Kannur experiences a summer season from March to the end of May. This is followed by the south-west monsoon until September. Even the smallest pollution in the atmosphere of Kannur affects the quality of the air and subsequently the health of the people here. In the first phase of Covid-19, Kannur district reported the highest number of cases in Kerala till 15 May. Ground based observations were carried out at Kannur town to investigate the variations of different trace pollutants in the atmosphere from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. The observational site lies in a coastal belt along the Arabian Sea and is very close to the National Highway (NH 17). Observational site at Kannur town (11.87° N 75.37° E 3 m msl) in northern part of Kerala state. Kannur in south India is shown in the Fig. 1A and the aerial view of Kannur town and surroundings with observational site is shown in the Fig. 1B.
Experimental setup
Observations of trace pollutants were carried out using the respective ground based gas analyzers from Environment S.A France. The measurements of the O3 were made using a continuous O3 analyzer (Model O342e) with a detection limit of 0.2.ppbv. Its working principle is based on O3 detection by direct absorption in UV light. O3 absorption spectrum is intense in the 250 and 270 nm wavelength range. Thus, it corresponds to the maximum range of O3 absorption at 255 nm. NO, NO2 and NH3 were measured with the aid of gas analyzer (Model AC32e) with a detection limit of 0.2 ppbv. Its working principle is based on the NO chemiluminescence in the presence of highly oxidizing O3 molecules. The NO in the ambient air is oxidized by O3 to form excited NO2 molecules. The concentrations of NO, NO2 were measured based on the spectrum of the radiation emitted by NO2 molecules at the excited level. Particulate matters (PM10 and PM2.5) were measured by using suspended particulate beta gauge monitor (Model MP101M). Its working principle is based on the particle measurement by beta radiation attenuation. The measurement consists of calculating the absorption difference between a blank filter and a loaded filter, knowing that the beta ray absorption follows an exponential law and is independent of the physiochemical nature of the particles.
Measurements of CO were made by using an analyzer (Model CO12e) with a detection limit of 0.05 ppm. Its working principle is based on CO detection by absorption in infrared light. VOC’s (BTEX) were measured, based on gas chromatography coupled with a PID detector by using (VOC72e) analyzer. SO2 measurements were made by using a UV fluorescent sulfur dioxide analyzer (Model AF22e) with a detection limit of 0.4 ppbv. The ambient air to be analyzed is filtered by a hydrocarbon removing aromatic molecule device. The hydrocarbon molecule free sample to be analyzed is sent to a reaction chamber, to be irradiated by an UV radiation centered at 214 nm, which is the SO2 molecule absorption wavelength. All the gas analyzers have been calibrated by using sample gases on a regular basis. The total solar radiation was measured by LSI LASTEM Italia (DPA870) pyranometer and surface air temperature measured by an external Pt100 sensor.
Air Quality Index (AQI) calculation
The AQI is a scale designed to help us to understand the quality of the air we breathe and it also helps provide advice on how to improve air quality. Further, this index provides special awareness to the public who are sensitive to air pollution (Beig, Ghude & Deshpande, 2010). Normally air pollution levels may be higher in towns, near power plants and large stationary emission sources. To identify the overall improvement in air quality over Kannur, AQI was calculated and the details of AQI are available elsewhere (CPCB, 2014; Sharma et al., 2020). The AQI is divided into five categories: good (0–50), satisfactory (51–100), moderate (101–200), poor (201–300), very poor (301–400) and severe (401–500) respectively. The observed concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2, O3, CO and NH3 were converted into AQI using standard value. The AQI for each pollutant was calculated by the following formula given by Sahu & Kota (2017).
Where Ci is the observed concentration of the pollutant “i”; BreakHI and BreakLO are breakpoint concentrations greater and smaller to Ci; and IHI and ILO are corresponding AQI ranges. Breakpoint concentration of different pollutants are provided by CPCB (2014) and is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Breakpoint of different pollutants for AQI calculation, by CPCB (2014).
AQI category (Range) | PM10 24-h | PM2.5 24-h | NO2 24-h | SO2 24-h | NH3 24-h | O3 8-h | CO 8-h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Good (0–50) | 0–50 | 0–30 | 0–40 | 0–40 | 0–200 | 0–50 | 0–1.0 |
Satisfactory (51–100) | 51–100 | 31–60 | 41–80 | 41–80 | 201–400 | 51–100 | 1.1–2.0 |
Moderate (101–200) | 101–250 | 61–90 | 81–180 | 81–380 | 401–800 | 101–168 | 2.1–10 |
Poor (201–300) | 251–350 | 91–120 | 181–280 | 381–800 | 801–1200 | 169–208 | 10.1–17 |
Very poor (301–400) | 351–430 | 121–250 | 281–400 | 801–1600 | 1,200–1,800 | 209–748 | 17.1–34 |
Severe (401–500) | 430+ | 250+ | 400+ | 1,600+ | 1,800+ | 748+ | 34+ |
Results and discussion
Diurnal variation of surface O3, NO, NO2
In order to study the impact of lockdown on the variation of trace pollutants over Kannur, the study period was divided into three spans; namely pre-lockdown period of 32 days (1–24 March 2020 and 10–17 May 2020), lockdown period of 25 days (25 March–19 April 2020), and a triple-lockdown period of 20 days (20 April–9 May 2020). O3 concentration at Kannur town was very low (8–20 ppbv) at night time and high (15–55 ppbv) during the day time.
Figure 2A depict a diurnal variation of O3 in Kannur town, and it shows that O3 was observed to be high during afternoon hours due to the photolysis NO2 in the presence of VOC’s, CO and CH4. The observed low concentration at night-time was mainly due to the loss of O3 by the titration with NO (Nishanth et al., 2014). Diurnal variation of O3 showed a similar pattern in pre-lockdown days, lockdown days, and triple-lockdown days but with differences in their concentrations. The maximum concentration of O3 observed on pre-lockdown 4.74 (ppbv), lockdown days and triple-lockdown days were (45.64 ± 4.74 days), (49.58 ± 3.1 ppbv) and (55.66 ± 2.61 ppbv) respectively. Thus, an enhancement in O3 concentration was observed over Kannur from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown and this increase is 22%.
The diurnal variations of NO and NO2 are shown in the Figs. 2B and 2C respectively. NO concentration was observed high in night and early morning hours and found to be low during afternoon hours. The diurnal average concentrations of NO observed during pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days were (5.4 ± 1.2 ppbv), (3.5 ± 1.1 ppbv) and (2.1 ± 0.82 ppbv) respectively. Thus, the concentration of NO was found to be declined considerably from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days, and the decrease was 61%. The domination of O3 titration in the presence of high concentration of NO is the primary reason for the observed low concentration of O3 during pre-lockdown days.
In pre-lockdown days, NO2 concentration was found to increase in daytime due to enhanced emissions from vehicles and industries. The diurnal average concentrations of NO2 observed during pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days were (9.6 ± 2.1 ppbv), (4.9 ± 1.8 ppbv), and (2.8 ± 0.88 ppbv) respectively. Hence, the concentration of NO2 was found to be decreased significantly from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days and the observed decrease was 71%. Conversely, O3 concentrations observed were higher on triple-lockdown and lockdown period than pre-lockdown period, even in the absence of industrial activities and low traffic. Certainly, relatively lesser release of NO during lockdown and triple-lockdown days reduces the O3 scavenging, and hence improved the photochemical production of O3 from its other precursors.
At city-scale, VOC-NOx ratio is the key factor of O3 formation (Pusede & Cohen, 2012). The urban areas are characterized by a low value of this ratio due to high NOx concentrations (Beekmann & Vautard, 2010). In an environment with “VOC-limited” conditions, VOCs concentration is highly sensitive in O3 formation in an environment with high NOx emission. Likewise, the ratio of (NO2)/(NO) that depends on the local concentration of O3, since it is produced by the photodissociation of NO2 and its sink is titration with NO. Thus, O3 increase is due to a lower titration of O3 by NO due to the strong reduction in local NOx emissions by road transport (Sicard et al., 2020). However, the presence of VOC’s and NOx allows the formation of O3 through NO2 photolysis through a complex chemistry (Monks et al., 2015).
The day time average concentrations of (NO2/NO) during pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days were estimated to be (1.82 ± 0.8 ppbv), (1.38 ± 0.6 ppbv) and (0.86 ± 0.5 ppbv) which indicated a reduction of (NO2/NO) by 47% from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. The ratio between average concentrations of BTEX and NOx were found to be (1.2 ± 1.6 ppbv), (1.65 ± 1.1 ppbv) and (1.96 ± 0.82 ppbv) during pre-lockdown, lockdown and triple-lockdown days respectively; with an increase of 63% from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown. During the lockdown period, O3 lapse rate due to the titration of NO might be less than its photochemical production from its precursors, and this may be the primary reason for the enhancement in O3 observed. Further, a strong possibility of VOCs emission from home (e.g., cleaning fireplaces, painting) and garden activities (e.g., biomass burning) may also have contributed to the O3 increase (Su, Mukherjee & Batterman, 2003; Murphy et al., 2007; Wolff, Kahlbaum & Heuss, 2013) in triple-lockdown days. Thus, the reduced concentration in NOx, and any enhancement of biogenic VOC’s and their transport may have played a promising role in the enhancement of O3 during triple-lockdown in Kannur town like other cities, which could be confirmed only after further investigations.
Diurnal variation of photo-dissociation rate coefficient j(NO2) was computed to estimate the strong dependance of NO2 on the observed enhancement of O3, during lockdown and triple-lockdown days as shown in Fig. 2D. The j(NO2) values exhibited the typical pattern of increasing gradually after sunrise, attaining a maximum value during noontime and decreasing during evening-time. The values of j(NO2) gradually increasing in tune with the intensity of solar radiation reaching on the surface. During pre-lockdown days, O3 concentration was increasing in full harmony with the variation of j(NO2). Therefore, a positive correlation is observed between O3 and j(NO2) during day time hours and the photo-dissociation coefficients were low due to the reduced concentration of NO2 in lockdown and triple-lockdown periods. It was further observed that j(NO2) values were decreased in pre-lockdown days and triple-lockdown days by a percentage of 16%. This reveals that the O3 production was the result of photo-dissociation of NO2 in the presence of biogenic VOCs during lockdown and triple-lockdown days.
Diurnal variation of particulate matters (PM10 and PM2.5)
The diurnal variations PM10 and PM2.5 during the study period are shown in the Figs. 3A and 3B. During pre-lockdown days PM10 and PM2.5 showed two peaks; of which one peak in the morning (07:00–10:00) hours and the other one in the late evening to night time (19:00–22:00) hours. Further, moderate levels were observed from night till the early morning hours due to shallow boundary layer (Yadav et al., 2014; Qu et al., 2018). Concentrations of particulate matters showed a morning peak followed by a decline in the afternoon on pre-lockdown days. The observed low concentrations of particulate matters during the afternoon hours can be attributed primarily to the dilution of particles linked with broaden boundary layer and also lesser traffic (Stafoggia et al., 2019).
In the lockdown days, the vehicular emissions were considerably reduced, and the observed magnitude of the morning peak was fairly small; whereas in triple-lockdown days the peak was absent due to the roads were deserted. The diurnal average concentration of PM10 observed on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days and triple-lockdown days were (127.8 ± 21 µg/m3), (70.96 ± 12.6 µg/m3) and (50.2 ± 10.11 µg/m3) respectively. The concentration of PM10 was found to decrease significantly from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days (45%) and lockdown days to triple-lockdown days (29%). Likewise, the diurnal average concentration of PM2.5 on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days and triple-lockdown days were (69.4 ± 17 µg/m3), (45.5 ± 8 µg/m3) and (32.5 ± 7.5 µg/m3) respectively. The concentration of PM2.5 was found to be decrease extensively from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days (34%) and lockdown days to triple-lockdown days (29%).
Linear negative correlations are obtained between PM10 and solar radiation (Fig. 3C) and surface O3 (Fig. 3D). The higher concentration of particulate matters on pre-lockdown days can reduce the photolysis rate j(NO2) in the lower troposphere and it can decrease photochemical production of O3 on these days. During pre-lockdown days, the observed low concentration of O3 indicates the different impacts of particulate matters on photolysis frequencies. A strong negative correlation coefficient (−0.91) between PM10 and solar radiation reveals the active daytime photochemistry over Kannur town.
Diurnal variation of solar radiation, air temperature, and relative humidity observed over Kannur during the study period is shown in the Figs. 4A–4C respectively. Intensity of solar radiation and temperature were increase by 7% and 4% from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days and relative humidity decreased by 8%. The increase in solar flux is attributed to the decline in the concentration of particulate matters (Li et al., 2011) in lockdown and triple-lockdown days, and this enhanced atmospheric temperature and declined relative humidity at this site.
Diurnal variation of CO, BTEX, SO2 and NH3
Diurnal variation of CO, BTEX, SO2 and NH3 observed during the observational period are shown in the Figs. 5A–5D respectively. In pre-lockdown days, the diurnal variation of CO, BTEX and SO2 shows two distinct peaks; one peak during morning (08:00–11:00) hours and other at late evening. The small duration of the morning peak was due to the expansion of boundary layer height whereas the large evening peak due to the shallow boundary layer. These peaks were associated with high traffic during the morning and evening hours. During lockdown days, a small peak observed in the morning was due to the presence of few vehicles; while the peak was absent in triple-lockdown days due to the roads were deserted.
The maximum concentration of CO observed in day time on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days, and triple-lockdown days were (642 ± 115 ppbv), (368 ± 79 ppbv) and (210 ± 70 ppbv) respectively. The concentration of CO was found to decrease significantly from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days, and lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. The maximum concentration of BTEX observed in day time on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days and triple-lockdown days were (9.5 ± 1.4 ppbv), (6.7 ± 1.1 ppbv) and (3.7 ± 0.8 ppbv) respectively. The concentration of BTEX was found to be decreased from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days, and lockdown days to triple-lockdown days due to absence of vehicular and industrial emissions.
The diurnal variation of SO2 was most pronounced during traffic hours over Kannur town. The maximum concentration of SO2 observed in day time on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days, and triple-lockdown days were (2.86 ± 0.72 ppbv), (1.82 ± 0.45 ppbv) and (1.08 ± 0.32 ppbv) respectively. Thus the concentration of SO2 was found to be decrease considerably from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days, and lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. During pre-lockdown period, the daily averaged NH3 concentrations varied from 5.1 to 5.8 ppbv. Daily NH3 exhibited a temporal variation with higher concentrations on the noon time hours; due to higher air temperatures and lower wind speeds. High air temperatures will favor NH3 volatilization, and the low wind speeds support the accumulation of air pollutants (Wang et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2016). The maximum concentration of NH3 observed in day time on pre-lockdown days, lockdown days, and triple-lockdown days were (5.84 ± 0.52 ppbv), (5.32 ± 0.41 ppbv) and (4.91 ± 0.32 ppbv) respectively. Like other trace pollutants, the concentration of NH3 was also found to be decreased from pre-lockdown period to triple-lockdown days due to complete shutdown of traffic and industrial activities in Kannur district.
AQI during the study period
The overall AQI of a day is the maximum AQI of the constituent pollutant, and the corresponding pollutant is the dominating pollutant. Figure 6 represents the variation of AQI during the study period over Kannur town. The highest index of 235 ± 32 which refers to poor air quality was observed in pre-lockdown period from 1 to 5 in March, during which the vehicular traffic was quite normal. From the figure, it is observed that the AQI was declining from 25th March coincides with the beginning of lockdown. In the first 5 days of the lockdown its average value was changed to 128 ± 22 and then to 118 ± 20 in the following days. Since the triple-lockdown in Kannur was implemented on 20th April, the value of AQI further come down and reached its lowest level at 48 ± 10 due to the ban of complete vehicles on the road. As a result, air pollution was highly reduced by which the air became unpolluted at this site. Thus, the enhanced air quality resulted from the triple-lockdown may prevent the virus spread in Kannur district.
Conclusion
The present study revealed a drastic reduction in air pollution over Kannur a town in north of Kerala state India, which was identified as one of the “first hotspots” of COVID 19 by the Government of India. Subsequently, a triple-lockdown was implemented from 20 April for further twenty days that restricted the movement of people. A considerable reduction in atmospheric air pollutants over this region was observed during the lockdown and triple-lockdown periods at this site. The highlights of the observation are the following:
Surface O3 concentration was increased to 22% in triple-lockdown period while NO and NO2 concentrations were decreased to 61% and 71% from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days. The primary reason for the increase in O3 is due to the reduction in titration of O3 with NO. The sensitivity of VOC’s (both biogenic and industrial) could be confirmed by measuring them on a long-term basis. The calculated diurnal profile of j(NO2) values showed a maximum reduction in triple-lockdown period due to the decrease in NO2.
The concentration of CO, VOC’s (BTEX), SO2 and NH3 were declined to 67%, 61%, 62% and 16% respectively from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown days.
The concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 were decreased to 61% and 53% respectively. Further, the increase in solar flux observed was mainly due to the absence of scattering and absorption of aerosols present in the atmosphere due to lockdown.
The AQI analysis revealed that the air quality in Kannur was quite improved during lockdown period.
The dramatic decline in air pollution during this lockdown has significant immediate consequences. Exposure to high levels of particulate matters and trace gases has substantial detrimental effects on human health. Many researchers have hypothesized that the drop in air pollution levels may currently be saving a significant amount of lives, not only by reducing individuals’ susceptibility to COVID-19, but also by preventing world’s seven million annual deaths due to air pollution exposure.
Yao et al. (2020) analyzed the death rate due to COVID-19 and spatial correlation of PM10 and PM 2.5 in China, and they revealed that higher concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 had a positive correlation with deaths caused by COVID-19. Wu et al. (2020) suggested that, long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) induced a risk of COVID-19. Further, they found that an increase of 1 μg/m3 in PM2.5 enhanced 8% morbidity due to COVID-19 in the United States. Fattorini & Regoli (2020) suggested that, chronic exposure of particulate matters (PM10 and PM2.5) could aggravate the susceptibility of COVID-19 infection. A positive correlation exhibited between concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, CO and COVID-19 outbreak in California (Bashir et al., 2020). It is reported, that air pollution has a positive association with COVID-19 confirmed cases in China (Zhu et al., 2020). Thus, this improvement in air quality during lock down might have played a vital role in bringing reduced susceptibility of virus getting infected into the lungs. The enhancement in the air quality induced by triple-lockdown might be one of the prime reasons by which Kerala could flatten the transmission curve for the first time in India. This association of air quality and spread of COVID if confirmed by future studies suggest that air quality should also be considered as part of an integrated approach towards human health protection and prevention of the epidemic spreads.
Supplemental Information
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Dr. Shyam Lal Program Director of (AT-CTM) for his support and inspiration. Resmi expresses her gratitude to Dr. R. Venkatachalam (Principal) and Dr. D. Manivannan (HOD of Physics) of Erode Arts and Science College Tamil Nadu for providing the necessary facilities. Authors gratefully acknowledge the effort made by Dr. Gufran Beig, Academic Editor of Peerj, and the other three anonymous reviewers for the critical reviewing of the manuscript and making valuable suggestions for the improvement of the manuscript in the present form.
Funding Statement
This work was carried out with the support of ISRO- GBP (AT-CTM) program and Kerala State Council for Science Technology and Environment (KSCSTE) and the project sanction order no. Council (P) Order No. 186/2009/KSCSTE dated 17.2.2009. KT Valsaraj received support from the Charles and Hilda Roddey Distinguished Professorship in Chemical Engineering at LSU. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
C.T. Resmi performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
T. Nishanth conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
M.K. Satheesh Kumar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
M.G. Manoj analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
M. Balachandramohan performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
K.T. Valsaraj conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Field Study Permissions
The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):
The observations are carried out with the support of ISRO-GBP(AT-CTN) project and Kerala state council of science, Technology, Environment and it is a long term continuous program. The approval reference number is Council (P)Order No. 186/2009/KSCSTE (dated 17.2.2009). The observations were carried out Kannur Town, and permission to access the private building where sampling took place was provided by Rama Chandra.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data is available as a Supplemental File.
References
- Al-Qahtani (2020).Al-Qahtani A. Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): emergence history basic and clinical aspects. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.04.033. Epub achead of print 23 April 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson (2000).Atkinson R. Atmospheric chemistry of VOCs and NOx. Atmospheric Environment. 2000;34(12–14):2063–2101. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00460-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bao & Zhang (2020).Bao R, Zhang A. Does lockdown reduce air pollution? Evidence from 44 cities in northern China. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;731:139052. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bashir et al. (2020).Bashir MF, Jiang BMA, Bilal KB, Bashir MA, Farooq TH, Iqbal N, Bashir M. Correlation between environmental pollution indicators and COVID-19 pandemic: a brief study in Californian context. Environmental Research. 2020;187:2020–109652. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bauwens et al. (2020).Bauwens M, Compernolle S, Stavrakou T, Müller J-F, Van Gent J, Eskes H, Levelt PF, Van der AR, Veefkind JP, Vlietinck J, Yu H, Zehner C. Impact of coronavirus outbreak on NO2 pollution assessed using TROPOMI and OMI observations. Geophysical Research Letters. 2020;47(11):e2020GL087978. doi: 10.1029/2020GL087978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beekmann & Vautard (2010).Beekmann M, Vautard R. A modelling study of photochemical regimes over Europe: robustness and variability. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2010;10(20):10067–10084. doi: 10.5194/acp-10-10067-2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Beig, Ghude & Deshpande (2010).Beig G, Ghude SD, Deshpande A. Scientific evaluation of air quality standards and defining air quality index for India. Pune: Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Ministry of Earth Science Government of India; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Chen & Kan (2008).Chen B, Kan H. Air pollution and population health: a global challenge. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. 2008;13(2):94–101. doi: 10.1007/s12199-007-0018-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng et al. (2006).Cheng Y, Ho KF, Lee SC, Law SW. Seasonal and diurnal variations of PM10 PM25 and PM10 in the roadside environment of Hong Kong. China Particuology. 2006;4(6):312–315. doi: 10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60281-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- CPCB (2014).CPCB . National air quality index report. New Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Dantas et al. (2020).Dantas G, Siciliano B, França BB, Da Silva CM, Arbilla G. The impact of COVID-19 partial lockdown on the air quality of the city of Rio de Janeiro Brazil. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;729:139085. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding et al. (2020).Ding M, Tian B, Ashley M, Zhu Z, Wang L, Yang S, Li C, Xiao C, Qin D. Year-round record of near-surface ozone and O3 enhancement events (OEEs) at Dome A, East Antarctica. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2020 doi: 10.5194/acp-2019-1042. Epub ahead of print 9 March 2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Duncan & Logan (2008).Duncan BN, Logan JA. Model analysis of the factors regulating the trends and variability of carbon monoxide between 1988 and 1997. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2008;8(24):7389–7403. doi: 10.5194/acp-8-7389-2008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dutheil, Baker & Navel (2020).Dutheil F, Baker SJ, Navel V. COVID-19 as a factor influencing air pollution? Environmental Pollution. 2020;263(Pt A):114466. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fattorini & Regoli (2020).Fattorini D, Regoli F. Role of the atmospheric pollution in the Covid-19 outbreak risk in Italy. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.23.20076455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franco et al. (2015).Franco JF, Pacheco J, Behrentz E, Belalcázar LC. Characterization and source identification of VOC species in Bogotá, Colombia. Atmósfera. 2015;28(1):1–11. doi: 10.20937/ATM.2015.28.01.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fuentes et al. (2000).Fuentes JD, Lerdau M, Atkinson R, Baidocchi D, Bottenheim JW, Ciccioli P, Lamb B, Geron C, Go L, Guenther A, Sharkey TG, Stockwell W. Biogenic hydrocarbons in the atmospheric boundary layer: a review. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society. 2000;81:1537–1575. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<1537:BHITAB>2.3.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gautam (2020).Gautam S. The influence of COVID-19 on air quality in India: a boon or inutile. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2020;104(6):724–726. doi: 10.1007/s00128-020-02877-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gautam & Hens (2020).Gautam S, Hens L. SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in India: what might we expect? Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2020;22(5):3867–3869. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00739-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo et al. (2017).Guo H, Kota SH, Sahu SK, Hu J, Ying Q, Gao A, Zhang H. Source apportionment of PM 2.5 in North India using source-oriented air quality models. Environmental Pollution. 2017;231:426–436. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo et al. (2019).Guo H, Kota SH, Sahu SK, Zhang H. Contributions of local and regional sources to PM2.5 and its health effects in north India. Atmospheric Environment. 2019;214:116867. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116867. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kanniah et al. (2020).Kanniah KD, Kamarul Zaman NAF, Kaskaoutis GD, Latif MT. COVID-19’s impact on the atmospheric environment in the Southeast Asia region. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;736:139658. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinoshita et al. (2020).Kinoshita H, Türkan H, Vucinic S, Naqvi S, Bedair R, Rezaee R, Tsatsakis A. Carbon monoxide poisoning. Toxicology Reports. 2020;7:169–173. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence & Lelieveld (2010).Lawrence MG, Lelieveld J. Atmospheric pollutant outflow from southern Asia: a review. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2010;10(22):11017–11096. doi: 10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li et al. (2011).Li J, Wang Z, Wang X, Yamaji K, Takigawa M, Kanaya Y, Pochanart P, Liu Y, Irie H, Hu B, Tanimoto H, Akimoto H. Impacts of aerosols on summertime tropospheric photolysis frequencies and photochemistry over Central Eastern China. Atmospheric Environment. 2011;45(10):1817–1829. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu et al. (2015).Liu Z, Hu B, Wang L, Wu F, Gao W, Wang Y. Seasonal and diurnal variation in particulate matter (PM10 and PM25) at an urban site of Beijing: analyses from a 9-year study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2015;22:627–642. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3347-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu et al. (2008).Liu Y, Shao M, Lu S, Chang CC, Wang JL, Chen G. Volatile organic compound (VOC) measurements in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2008;8(6):1531–1545. doi: 10.5194/acp-8-1531-2008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lu et al. (2018).Lu X, Hong J, Zhang L, Cooper OR, Schultz MG, Xu X, Wang T, Gao M, Zhao Y, Zhang Y. Severe surface ozone pollution in China: a global perspective. Environmental Science & Technology Letters. 2018;5(8):487–494. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lu, Stratton & Tang (2020).Lu H, Stratton CW, Tang Y-W. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: the mystery and the miracle. Journal of Medical Virology. 2020;92(4):401–402. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahato, Pal & Ghosh (2020).Mahato S, Pal S, Ghosh KG. Effect of lockdown amid COVID-19 pandemic on air quality of the megacity Delhi, India. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;730:139086. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maji, Beig & Yadav (2020).Maji S, Beig G, Yadav R. Winter VOCs and OVOCs measured with PTR-MS at an urban site of India: role of emissions, meteorology and photochemical sources. Environmental Pollution. 2020;258:113651. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mallik & Lal (2014).Mallik C, Lal S. Seasonal characteristics of SO2, NO2, and CO emissions in and around the Indo-Gangetic plain. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2014;186(2):1295–1310. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3458-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menchaca-Torre, Mercado-Hernandez & Mendoza-Domínguez (2015).Menchaca-Torre HL, Mercado-Hernandez R, Mendoza-Domínguez A. Diurnal and seasonal variation of volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere of Monterrey, Mexico. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 2015;6(6):1073–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2015.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Monks et al. (2015).Monks PS, Archibald AT, Colette A, Cooper O, Coyle M, Derwent R, Fowler D, Granier C, Law KS, Mills GE, Stevenson DS, Tarasova O, Thouret V, Von Schneidemesser E, Sommariva R, Wild O, Williams ML. Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2015;15(15):8889–8973. doi: 10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Montero-Montoya, Lopez-Vargas & Arellano-Aguilar (2018).Montero-Montoya R, Lopez-Vargas R, Arellano-Aguilar O. Volatile organic compounds in air: sources distribution exposure and associated illnesses in children. Annals of Global Health. 2018;84(2):225–238. doi: 10.29024/aogh.910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muhammad, Long & Salman (2020).Muhammad S, Long X, Salman M. COVID-19 pandemic and environmental pollution: a blessing in disguise? Science of the Total Environment. 2020;728:138820. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy et al. (2007).Murphy JG, Day DA, Cleary PA, Wooldridge PJ, Millet DB, Goldstein AH, Cohen RC. The weekend effect within and downwind of Sacramento-part 1: observations of ozone nitrogen oxides and VOC reactivity. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2007;7(20):5327–5339. doi: 10.5194/acp-7-5327-2007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nakada & Urban (2020).Nakada LYK, Urban RC. COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on the air quality during the partial lockdown in São Paulo state Brazil. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;730:139089. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nishanth et al. (2014).Nishanth T, Praseed KM, Satheesh Kumar MK, Valsaraj KT. Influence of ozone precursors and PM10 on the variation of surface O3 over Kannur India. Atmospheric Research. 2014;138:112–124. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pandolfi et al. (2012).Pandolfi M, Amato F, Reche C, Alastuey A, Otjes RP, Blom MJ, Querol X. Summer ammonia measurements in a densely populated Mediterranean city. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2012;12(16):7557–7575. doi: 10.5194/acp-12-7557-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Phan et al. (2013).Phan NT, Kim KH, Shon ZH, Jeon EC, Jung K, Kim NJ. Analysis of ammonia variation in the urban atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment. 2013;65:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pusede & Cohen (2012).Pusede SE, Cohen RC. On the observed response of ozone to NOx and VOC reactivity reductions in San Joaquin Valley California 1995–present. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2012;12(18):8323–8339. doi: 10.5194/acp-12-8323-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Qu et al. (2017).Qu YW, Han Y, Wu YH, Gao P, Wang TJ. Study of PBLH and its correlation with particulate matter from one-year observation over Nanjing, Southeast China. Remote Sensing. 2017;9(7):668. doi: 10.3390/rs9070668. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Qu et al. (2018).Qu Y, Wang T, Cai Y, Wang S, Chen P, Li S, Li M, Yuan C, Wang J, Xu S. Influence of atmospheric particulate matter on ozone in Nanjing China: observational study and mechanistic analysis. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences. 2018;35(11):1381–1395. doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-8027-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Resmi et al. (2020).Resmi CT, Nishanth T, Satheesh Kumar MK, Balachandramohan M, Valsaraj KT. Long-term variations of air quality influenced by surface ozone in a coastal site in India: association with synoptic meteorological conditions with model simulations. Atmosphere. 2020;11(2):193. doi: 10.3390/atmos11020193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sahu & Kota (2017).Sahu SK, Kota SH. Significance of PM 2.5 air quality at the Indian capital. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2017;17(2):588–597. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.06.0262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma et al. (2020).Sharma S, Zhang M, Gao AJ, Zhang H, Kota SH. Effect of restricted emissions during COVID-19 on air quality in India. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;728:138878. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi & Brasseur (2020).Shi X, Brasseur GP. The response in air quality to the reduction of Chinese economic activities during the COVID-19 Outbreak. Geophysical Research Letters. 2020;47(11):e2020GL088070. doi: 10.1029/2020GL088070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sicard et al. (2020).Sicard P, Marco AD, Agathokleous E, Feng Z, Xu X, Paoletti E, Rodriguez JJD, Calatayud V. Amplified ozone pollution in cities during the COVID-19 lockdown. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;735:139542. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava, Sengupta & Dutta (2005).Srivastava A, Sengupta B, Dutta SA. Source apportionment of ambient VOCs in Delhi city. Science of the Total Environment. 2005;343(1–3):207–220. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stafoggia et al. (2019).Stafoggia M, Bellander T, Bucci S, Davoli M, De Hoogh K, De’ Donato F, Gariazzo C, Lyapustin A, Michelozzi P, Renzi M, Scortichini M, Shtein A, Viegi G, Kloog I, Schwartz J. Estimation of daily PM10 and PM25 concentrations in Italy 2013–2015 using a spatiotemporal land-use random-forest model. Environment International. 2019;124:170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su, Mukherjee & Batterman (2003).Su FC, Mukherjee B, Batterman S. Determinants of personal, indoor and outdoor VOC concentrations: an analysis of the RIOPA data. Environmental Research. 2003;126:192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2013.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tobías et al. (2020).Tobías A, Carnerero C, Reche C, Massagué J, Via M, Minguillón MC, Alastuey A, Querol X. Changes in air quality during the lockdown in Barcelona (Spain) one month into the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;726:138540. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang et al. (2020).Wang P, Chen K, Zhu S, Wang P, Zhang H. Severe air pollution events not avoided by reduced anthropogenic activities during COVID-19 outbreak. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2020;158:104814. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang et al. (2015).Wang S, Nan J, Shi C, Fu Q, Gao S, Wang D, Cui H, Saiz-Lopez A, Zhou B. Atmospheric ammonia and its impacts on regional air quality over the megacity of Shanghai, China. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(1):15842. doi: 10.1038/srep15842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang & Su (2020).Wang Q, Su M. A preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on environment—a case study of China. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;728:138915. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolff, Kahlbaum & Heuss (2013).Wolff GT, Kahlbaum DF, Heuss JM. The vanishing ozone weekday/weekend effect. Journal of the Air Waste Management Association. 2013;63(3):292–299. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2012.749312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu et al. (2020).Wu X, Nethery RC, Sabath BM, Braun D, Dominici F. Exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States: a nationwide cross-sectional study. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.05.20054502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yadav et al. (2016).Yadav R, Sahu LK, Beig G, Jaaffre SNA. Role of long-range transport and local meteorology in seasonal variation of surface ozone and its precursors at an urban site in India. Atmospheric Research. 2016;176:96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yadav et al. (2019a).Yadav R, Sahu LK, Beig G, Tripathi N, Maji S, Jaaffrey SNA. The role of local meteorology on ambient particulate and gaseous species at an urban site of western India. Urban Climate. 2019a;28:100449. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yadav et al. (2014).Yadav R, Sahu LK, Jaaffrey SNA, Beig G. Temporal variation of particulate matter (PM) and potential sources at an urban site of Udaipur in western India. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2014;14(6):1613–1629. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2013.10.0310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yadav et al. (2019b).Yadav R, Sahu LK, Tripathi N, Pal D, Beig G, Jaffrey SNA. Investigation of emission characteristics of NMVOCs over urban site of Western India. Environmental Pollution. 2019b;252:245–255. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao et al. (2020).Yao Y, Pan J, Wang W, Liu Z, Kan H, Meng X, Wang W. Spatial correlation of particulate matter pollution and death rate of COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.07.20052142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang et al. (2017).Zhang L, Lee CS, Zhang R, Chen L. Spatial and temporal evaluation of long term trend (2005–2014) of OMI retrieved NO2 and SO2 concentrations in Henan Province China. Atmospheric Environment. 2017;154:151–166. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao et al. (2016).Zhao M, Wang S, Tan J, Hua Y, Wu D, Hao J. Variation of urban atmospheric ammonia pollution and its relation with PM25 chemical property in winter of Beijing China. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2016;16:1378–1389. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu et al. (2020).Zhu Y, Xie J, Huang F, Cao L. Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 infection: Evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;727:138704. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data is available as a Supplemental File.