Skip to main content
Drug Design, Development and Therapy logoLink to Drug Design, Development and Therapy
. 2020 Jul 30;14:3069–3078. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S252681

In vivo Screening of Natural Products Against Angiogenesis and Mechanisms of Anti-Angiogenic Activity of Deoxysappanone B 7,4ʹ-Dimethyl Ether

Kan Chen 1, Yuqi Fan 1, Jun Gu 1, Zhihua Han 1, Huasu Zeng 1, Chengyu Mao 1, Changqian Wang 1,
PMCID: PMC7398751  PMID: 32801645

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to screen the leading compounds of natural origin with anti-angiogenic potential and to investigate their anti-angiogenic mechanism preliminarily.

Materials and Methods

An initial screening of 240 compounds from the Natural Products Collection of MicroSource was performed using the transgenic zebrafish strain Tg [fli1a: enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)]y1. The zebrafish embryos at 24 h post-fertilization were exposed to the natural compounds for an additional 24 h; then, morphological changes in the intersegmental vessels (ISVs) were observed and quantified under a fluorescence microscope. The expression profiles of angiogenesis-related genes in the zebrafish embryos were detected using quantitative real-time PCR.

Results

Five compounds were identified with potential anti-angiogenic activity on the zebrafish embryogenesis. Among them, deoxysappanone B 7.4ʹ-dimethyl ether (Deox B 7,4) showed anti-angiogenic activity on the formation of ISVs in a dose-dependent manner. The inhibition of ISV formation reached up to 99.64% at 5 μM Deox B 7,4. The expression of delta-like ligand 4 (dll4), hes-related family basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor with YRPW motif 2, ephrin B2, fibroblast growth factor receptor (fgfr) 3, cyclooxygenase-2, protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type B (ptp-rb), phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 2, slit guidance ligand (slit) 2, slit3, roundabout guidance receptor (robo) 1, robo2, and robo4 were down-regulated, while vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, fgfr 1, and matrix metallopeptidase 9 were up-regulated in the zebrafish embryos treated with Deox B 7,4.

Conclusion

Deox B 7,4 has a therapeutic potential for the treatment of angiogenesis-dependent diseases and may exert anti-angiogenic activities by suppressing the slit2/robo1/2, slit3/robo4, cox2/ptp-rb/pik3r2, and dll4/hey2/efnb2a signaling pathways as well as activation of vegfr-2/fgfr1/mmp9.

Keywords: angiogenesis, natural products, deoxysappanone B 7, 4ʹ-dimethyl ether, delta-like ligand 4, slit guidance ligand/roundabout guidance receptor, protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type B

Introduction

Angiogenesis is the physiological process by which new blood vessels generate from pre-existing vessels.1,2 Physiological angiogenesis is a normal and a vital process in embryo development and wound healing. However, abnormally accelerated angiogenesis or pathological angiogenesis is associated with several diseases, including cancer.3 The proliferation and the metastatic spread of cancer cells depend on an adequate supply of nutrients and oxygen, which are key components of blood.4 Both activators and inhibitors regulate angiogenesis. Keeping a balance between activators and inhibitors is crucial for vascular homeostasis.3 Angiogenesis inhibitors may systematically disrupt blood vessel formation or support removal of existing vessels by acting on several proteins that have been identified as angiogenic activators, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF), angiogenin, transforming growth factor (TGF)-α, TGF-β, tumor necrosis factor-α, platelet-derived endothelial growth factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, placental growth factor, interleukin-8, hepatocyte growth factor, and epidermal growth factor.5 Therefore, the discovery of novel angiogenic inhibitors may help to reduce both morbidity and mortality related to carcinomas.

Due to a vast molecular, structural, and chemical diversity, natural products (NPs) have a higher likelihood to exhibit specific bioactivities than the ones exhibited by many synthetic small molecules.6 The use of NPs in drug discovery has significantly declined because of the phenomenal advances in high-throughput screening and combinatorial synthesis during the past two decades; however, they remain the best sources of drugs and drug leads.7 The vast, untapped, ecological biodiversity of NPs favor their consideration in drug discovery and drug development. The Zebrafish is an ideal in vivo model platform to systematically identify bioactive natural products with therapeutic potential. There is a strong conservation in genetics, development, and physiology between the zebrafish and humans.8 The zebrafish embryos are optically transparent, allowing for visual screening, and observation of the effects of drugs on internal organs during the embryogenesis process.9 The zebrafish embryos are small, only 1 mm to 5 mm, and consequently compatible with microtiter plates for screening, and require only microgram amounts of the compound to be tested.10 The ease of maintenance at high densities and high fecundity of the zebrafish provide representative significant statistical data for experimental analysis.9

In the present study, we screened 240 compounds from the Natural Products Collection of MicroSource Discovery Systems [NP150704]11 (http://www.msdiscovery.com) using a transgenic zebrafish line with fluorescent blood vessels.12 Among the screened compounds, five compounds, dihydro-munduletone, deoxysappanone B 7,4ʹ-Dimethyl Ether (Deox B 7,4), Mundoserone, ononetin, and pomiferin, were identified to have potential anti-angiogenic activity on the zebrafish embryogenesis. Since the anti‑angiogenic activity of dihydro-munduletone and mundoserone has been reported in previous studies,13,14 we focused on the anti-angiogenic activity of Deox B 7,4 on the zebrafish embryos in this study. qRT-PCR was used to examine the expression pattern of various genes that regulate angiogenesis in the zebrafish embryos treated with Deox B 7,4. Our data supported the potential utility of Deox B 7,4 in the treatment of angiogenic-dependent diseases.

Materials and Methods

Zebrafish Care and Maintenance

The zebrafish strain Tg (fli1a:EGFP)y1 with transgenic endothelial cells expressing EGFP was obtained from the Shanghai Research Center for Model Organisms (Shanghai, China). The adult zebrafishes were maintained at 28.5°C under a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle. The embryos were generated by natural pair-wise breeding. Five pairs to six pairs of the zebrafishes can produce up to 200 embryos–300 embryos per mating session. The embryos were raised at 28.5°C in deionized water containing 0.2% Instant Ocean Salt (Aquarium Systems, Inc., Mentor, OH, USA). The embryos were washed and staged, as described in the previous study.15 The establishment and characterization of the fli1a-EGFP transgenic lines were performed according to the methods described by a previous study.16 All protocols comply with the guidelines of the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International.

Drug Library and Drug Treatment

The 240 compounds used for the initial screening in this study were obtained from the Natural Products Collection Library (MicroSource Discovery Systems, Gaylordsville, CT, USA) (Supplementary Table 1). All compounds in the product were at 95% purity or greater and were provided in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution at a concentration of 10 mM. The compounds were aliquoted into ten 96-well plates with one compound per well and 80 compounds per plate. The plates were stored at −80°C for the initial screening and re-testing procedure.

At 24 h post-fertilization (hpf), the Tg (fli1a:EGFP) embryos were distributed into 12-well plates (30 embryos/well) with 250 μL deionized water containing 0.2% Instant Ocean Salt in each well. The compounds were diluted in 0.1% DMSO and added to each well at a final concentration of 10 μM. PTK787 (5 μM, Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA), a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) antagonist,17 was used as a positive control and 0.1% DMSO was used as a negative control. To observe the concentration-dependent anti-angiogenic effects of Deox B 7,4, the Tg (fli1a:EGFP) embryos were added to 12-well plates (30 embryos/well) and exposed to 1 μM, 2.5 μM, and 5 μM of Deox B 7,4 for 24 h.

Angiogenesis Assessment

After 48 hpf, ten embryos in each well were anesthetized with 0.016% MS-222 (tricaine methanesulfonate, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and the morphology of the intersegmental vessels (ISVs), which normally connect the dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessels (DLAVs) to the dorsal aorta (DA), was visualized and assessed using the Nikon SMZ 1500 Fluorescence microscope (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital camera. Quantitative image analyses were performed using image-based morphometric analysis software NIS-Elements D3.1 (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). To optimally visualize the morphology of ISVs, the Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA) was used to adjust the images for their levels of brightness, contrast, hue, and saturation. Lead compounds were defined as the compounds which inhibited the total number of ISVs formed and/or the number of complete ISVs (ie, the number of ISVs that connect DA to DLAV). Drug effects were calculated according to the following formula:

Inhibition (%) = (1 – ISVconcentration of compound/ISVvehicle) × 100%.

Drug Toxicity

The remaining embryos in each well of 12-well plates were continuously treated with compounds for another 24 h, the toxic effects of compounds on the zebrafish embryo development were observed under the Nikon SMZ 1500 Fluorescence microscope.

RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from 30 to 50 embryos that were treated with 5 μM Deox B 7,4, 5 μM PTK787, or DMSO for 24 h using TRIzol® (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Otsu, Japan). The quantification of gene expression was performed in triplicates using the iQ™ SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and the Mastercycler® Realplex system (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Primers used in this study have been listed in Table 1. β-actin was used as an internal reference. The relative gene expression was quantified based on the comparative threshold cycle method (2−ΔΔCt). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Table 1.

Primer Sequences Used in This Study

Gene Forward Primer 5ʹ-3’ Reverse Primer 5ʹ-3’
dll4 AGGCCTGGCACTCACCTTACTC CACCCCAGCCCTCTTTACAGTT
notch1a GCCGCAGATGCAGGGCAATGAAGT GAGGGCAGGCAGGGCTGGTAGAGG
hey2 CGGCTTCCGGGAGTGTCTGACT TCCCCACGGTCGGTATGGTTTA
efnb2a TTGGGGCCTGGAGTTCTTCAGA TCTTGGGCGTGGCTAATGTGCT
slit2 GAGCGACTGGACCTGAATG GTAGATCCTGAAATGCCCCTC
slit3 GCGAGTGTTTCCAAGACCTG GATTTCATTGTCGTTCAGCCG
robo1 AGGAGTCACATACAGGCTAGAG GTCTGAGATCTGCTGGGAAATG
robo2 GAGGTGTGGATGTGGACTATG CTACAATCCGAGGTGGAGAATC
robo4 GAGATCAGTCCCAAACCACAG CCCACAGATATAGCCCAACG
vegfaa CTCCATCTGTCTGCTGTAAAGG GGGATACTCCTGGATGATGTCTA
kdr/flk1/vegfr-2 CCTGAGACCATCTTTGACCG GTTCCCTCTTTAAGTCGCCTG
flt1/vegfr-1 GTATTTGAACAGCACGGGTTTAG CGGCTTCTTGATATGCGTTTG
fgfr1 CCTGCGCAACGATCAGATGGAGAT TTGCCGTTTTTAAGCCACTTGAGC
fgfr2 CCCCGACAACCGCACGCTCGTA TAGCCGCCCATGCGATCCTCCTGT
fgfr3 TCCCCGTATCCAGGTATCC TCTGAACGTGGGTCTTTGTG
fgfr4 GCTGCGCATTGGATTGACCGATAA AGGCCCCAGGCGATTACTGTCCTT
COX2 CCTTCCGGCCATCATTCTTATT CCGCAGATTTCAGAGCATTGTC
mmp9 GTGCCGGACATCCGCAACTACA CACCAGGGAAGGCCATCTGTGC
ptp-rb TTGGGCAGCATGCGGAATACTGAG TTACCAGGCTGCCATGAAACATCC
pik3r2/p85β CCCGGAAACTGCTCCCCCTAATCT AGCGGGAGGAGTCGGCTCTTGTT
β-actin TCCGGTATGTGCAAAGCCGG CCACATCTGCTGGAAGGTGG

Abbreviations: dll4, delta-like ligand 4; notch1a, neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1; hey2, hes-related family basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor with YRPW motif 2; efnb2, ephrin B2; slit2, slit guidance ligand 2; slit3, slit guidance ligand 3; robo, roundabout guidance receptor; vegfaa, vascular endothelial growth factor Aa; vegfr, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; fgfr, fibroblast growth factor receptor; COX, cyclooxygenase; mmp9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; ptp-rb, protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type B; pik3r2, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 2.

Statistical Analysis

All results were presented as means ± standard error of the mean. Differences between the two groups were evaluated using a t-test. For multiple comparisons, analysis of variance was employed. GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis and graphical representation of the data. P <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant (*), P <0.01 was considered as statistically very significant (**), and P <0.001 was considered as statistically highly significant (***).

Results

Angiogenesis Drug Screening

The transgenic zebrafish line Tg (fli1a:EGFP) was used for angiogenesis drug screening. Among 240 compounds from the Natural Products Collection Library, 5 compounds, dihydromunduletone, Deox B 7,4, ononetin, mundoserone, and pomiferin, exhibited strong anti-angiogenic activity on the zebrafish embryogenesis (Table 2). Dihydromunduletone inhibits angiogenic vessel growth in the zebrafish, which has been reported in the previous study.17 The zebrafish embryos in the vehicle group developed complete ISVs, DA, and DLAV, while the formation of ISVs, DA, and DLAV in the zebrafish embryos treated with PTK787 was completely inhibited. In comparison of the vehicle group to the positive controls, the embryos treated with Deox B 7,4, ononetin, or pomiferin presented a few incomplete ISVs, and the primary sprouts of DA can be occasionally observed (Figure 1). The chemical structures of Deox B 7,4, ononetin, and pomiferin have been presented in Figure 2. Twelve compounds showed toxic activity on the zebrafish embryos, mundulone, celastrol, purpurogallin-4-carboxylic acid, purpurogallin, and agaric acid caused 100% mortality; 4-nonylphenol caused 80% mortality; madecassic acid caused 40% mortality. 7-desacetoxy-6,7-dehydrogedunin, obliquin, and rhamnetin exhibited organ-specific (skin, muscle, heart, and fin) toxicity. Moreover, 3-methylcatechol inhibited pigmentation, while xanthone inhibited hatching (Table 2).

Table 2.

Summary of the Initial Screening of 240 Compounds from the Natural Products Collection Library

Embryo Stage at Treatment Angiogenesis Inhibit (%) Toxicity ID Mol Name Mol Wt
48 hpf 100% death 00200011 Munduletone 434.494
48 hpf 100 00210203 Dihydro-munduletone 424.498
48 hpf 100 02300332 Deoxysappanone B 7,4ʹ-dimethyl ether 314.341
48 hpf 100% skin and muscle toxicity 00100146 7-desacetoxy-6,7-dehydrogedunin 422.526
48 hpf 80% death 00330085 4-nonylphenol 220.358
72hpf 100% cardiovascular toxicity 00100540 Obliquin 244.249
72 hpf Fin-reduction phenotypes 00310031 Rhamnetin 316.27
72 hpf Pigmentation inhibition 01600919 3-Methylcatechol 140.140
72 hpf Hatching inhibition 00200523 Xanthone 196.208
48 hpf 100 00212097 Ononetin 258.276
48 hpf 100 00201477 Mundoserone 342.352
48 hpf 100 00201580 Pomiferin 420.466
48 hpf 40% death 01505250 Madecassic acid 504.713
48 hpf 100% death 00201664 Celastrol 450.624
48 hpf 100% death 00240826 Purpurogallin-4-carboxylic acid 264.193
48 hpf 100% death 00210505 Purpurogallin 220.183
48 hpf 100% death 01505775 Agaric acid 416.560

Abbreviations: ID, identification number in the Natural Products Collection Library; Mol, molecule; Wt, weight; hpf, hours post fertilization.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative bright-field (A, D, G, J and M) and fluorescent (B, E, H, K and N) images of 24 h post-fertilization zebrafish embryos exposed to 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (control), 10 μM lead compounds, or 5 μM PTK787 for 24 h (magnification ×40). The images of (C, F, I, L and O) (magnification ×112.5) are the subset of the images B, E, H, K, N, respectively. Asterisks indicate occasional sprouts of DA. Scar bar = 200 μm; Deox B 7,4, Deoxysappanone B 7,4ʹ-Dimethyl Ether.

Abbreviations: DLAV, dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessels; ISVs, intersegmental vessels; DA, dorsal aorta; PCV, posterior cardinal vein.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Chemical structures of Deox B 7,4 (A), ononetin (B) and pomiferin (C). Deoxysappanone B 7,4ʹ-Dimethyl Ether, Deox B 7,4.

Deox B 7,4 Inhibited the Formation of ISVs in the Zebrafish Embryos in a Dose-Dependent Manner

The dose-response effect of Deox B 7,4 on ISVs formation of the zebrafish was further investigated. After the Tg (fli1a:EGFP)y1 embryos were treated with 1 μM, 2.5 μM, and 5 μM of Deox B 7,4, respectively, for 24 h, the number of complete ISVs formed in the zebrafish embryos at 48 hpf declined accordingly (Figure 3). The number of complete ISVs in the zebrafish embryos treated with Deox B 7,4 was significantly reduced as compared to the number of ISVs in the vehicle group, and the inhibition rates of 1, 2.5, or 5 μM Deox B 7,4 on the formation of ISVs were up to 89.13%, 96.02%, or 99.64%, respectively (Figure 3P and Q).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative bright-field (AE) and fluorescent (FJ) images of 24 h post-fertilization zebrafish embryos exposed to 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (control), 1 μM, 2.5 μM, or 5 μM Deox B 7,4, or 5 μM PTK787 for 24 h (magnification ×40). The image of (KO) (magnification ×112.5) is a subset of the image of (FJ), respectively. Asterisks indicate occasional sprouts of DA. (P) The number of complete ISVs in embryos treated with dimethyl sulfoxide, Deox B 7,4, or PTK787. (Q) The inhibition rate of complete ISVs in Deox B 7,4-treated embryos. Values have been displayed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n=10). ***P <0.001. Scar bar = 200 μm; Deox B 7,4, Deoxysappanone B 7,4ʹ-Dimethyl Ether.

Abbreviations: DLAV, dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessels; ISVs, intersegmental vessels; DA, dorsal aorta; PCV, posterior cardinal vein.

Deox B 7,4 Regulated the Expression of Angiogenesis-Related Genes During Zebrafish Embryogenesis

In order to unveil the molecular mechanisms underlying the Deox B 7,4-mediated inhibition of growth of angiogenic vessels in the zebrafish, qRT-PCR was performed to evaluate the expression of the genes that participated in the angiogenesis-associated signaling pathways in embryos, ie, delta-like ligand 4 (dll4), neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1 (notch1a), hes-related family basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor with YRPW motif 2 (hey2), ephrin B2 (efnb2), slit guidance ligand (slit) 2, slit3, roundabout guidance receptor (robo) 1, robo2, robo4, vascular endothelial growth factor Aa (vegfaa), vegfr-1, vegfr-2, fibroblast growth factor receptor (fgfr) 1, fgfr2, fgfr3, fgfr4, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), matrix metallopeptidase 9 (mmp9), protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type B (ptp-rb), phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 2 (pik3r2). As shown in Figure 4, Deox B 7,4 treatment significantly suppressed the expression of dll4, hey2, efnb2, slit2, slit3, robo1, robo2, robo4, fgfr3, COX2, ptp-rb, and pik3r2; Deox B 7,4 treatment markedly promoted the expression of fgfr1, vegfr-2, and mmp9 as compared to the expression of genes in the vehicle group. No significant difference in the expression of notch1a, fgfr2, fgfr4, vegfaa, and vegfr-1 was observed between the vehicle group and the Deox B 7,4-treated group.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Expression profiles of angiogenesis-related genes in 24 h post-fertilization zebrafish embryos treated with 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (control), 5 μM Deox B 7,4, or 5 μM PTK787 for 24 h. Values have been displayed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n=4). **P <0.01 vs control, ***P <0.001 vs control. ns, not significant.

Abbreviations: vegfaa, vascular endothelial growth factor Aa; vegfr, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; fgfr, fibroblast growth factor receptor; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; mmp9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; ptp-rb, protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type B; pik3r2, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 2; slit, slit guidance ligand; robo, roundabout guidance receptor; dll4, delta-like ligand 4; notch1a, neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1; hey2, Hes-related family basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor with YRPW motif 2; efnb2, ephrin B2.

Discussion

Pathological angiogenesis has been reported in a range of angiogenesis-dependent diseases, including cancer,18 psoriasis,19 diabetic retinopathy,20 rheumatoid arthritis,21 and endometriosis.22 Tumor angiogenesis provides the tumor with a continuous supply of blood and nutrients in the tumor microenvironment, hence promotes tumor progression. Anti-angiogenesis strategies are considered as a promising new form of cancer treatment.3 Several anti-angiogenesis NP drugs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and continue to be used for cancer treatment;2325 however, the wide range of side effects caused by these anti-angiogenesis agents limits their broad application and acceptability.26,27 Using the transgenic zebrafish strain Tg (fli1a:EGFP)y1, we screened 240 compounds from the Natural Products Collection Library and identified five lead compounds (dihydromunduletone, Deox B 7,4, ononetin, mundoserone, and pomiferin) with strong anti-angiogenic activity on angiogenic vessel-growth of the zebrafish. Of these five leads, dihydromunduletone has been demonstrated to inhibit the intersegmental vessel growth in the zebrafish and possesses antitumor activity against prostate cancer.13 Besides, the anti‑angiogenic activity of Mundoserone has been reported in our previous study.14

In this study, we used zebrafish strain Tg (fli1a:EGFP)y1 as the in vivo model for screening of natural products because of its high genetic, pharmacologic and physiologic similarity with humans. Besides, the zebrafish is usually small, optical transparency and produces a large number of embryos. These characters define zebrafish as an ideal in vivo model for drug discovery compared with other animals, such as rats and mice.28,29 The zebrafish strain Tg (fli1a:EGFP)y1 is a transgenic zebrafish strain which exhibits vasculature-specific expression of EGFP in tail and trunk during embryonic and larval development. This strain has been frequently used as the in vivo model for studying the angiogenic activity of nature products.10,30

The anti-angiogenic activity of mundoserone on zebrafish embryogenesis has been previously reported by a study conducted by our group.14 Deox B 7,4 seemed to exhibit the most robust anti-angiogenic activity on angiogenic vessel-growth of the zebrafish as compared to the anti-angiogenic activity exhibited by the other four compounds (Figure 1). In this study, we further evaluated Deox B 7,4 for its anti-angiogenic efficacy and mechanism of action.

Deox B 7,4 is a compound with anti-leukemic activity.31 In the present study, we found that Deox B 7,4 can also function as an anti-angiogenic agent to inhibit the vessel growth of the zebrafish. The Tg (fli1a:EGFP)y1 embryos at 24 hpf were exposed to 1, 2.5, and 5 μM of Deox B 7,4, respectively, for 24 h, the number of complete ISVs formed in the zebrafish embryos at 48 hpf was observed under a fluorescence microscope. Deox B 7,4 treatment in a dose-dependent manner inhibited the ISVs formation in the zebrafish embryos, and almost completely inhibited the ISVs formation at 5 μM (99.64% inhibition, Figure 3). These findings suggest that Deox B 7,4 possesses anti-angiogenic activities and has a therapeutic potential for the treatment of angiogenesis-dependent disorders, especially cancer.

Pro-angiogenic factors, VEGF and FGF, can stimulate angiogenesis through specific binding to cell surface-expressed receptors with tyrosine kinase activity. The activation of receptor kinases leads to downstream signaling cascades that regulate various aspects of endothelial cells like differentiation, proliferation, and migration.32 In this study, we detected the gene expression of vegfaa, VEGF and FGF receptors vegfr-1, vegfr-2, fgfr1, fgfr2, fgfr3, and fgfr4 in the zebrafish embryos treated with Deox B 7,4. We observed that fgfr3 was significantly down-regulated in the zebrafish embryos as compared to the levels observed in the vehicle group (Figure 4), suggesting that Deox B 7,4 may exert anti-angiogenesis activity via suppressing fgfr3 in the zebrafish. The up-regulation of vegfr-2 and fgfr1 may be attributed to the stress-response of Deox B 7,4 treatment. The FGF signaling pathway is responsible for the maintenance of vascular integrity through enhancement of the stability of VE-cadherin at adherens junctions. Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are involved in the maintenance of the VE-cadherin-catenin complex at adherens junctions.33 Blockade of the FGF signaling pathway has been demonstrated to accelerate the degradation of PTP non-receptor type 11 (PTPN11) and disrupts the PTPN11/VE-cadherin interaction, leading to the loss of endothelial junction integrity and loss of endothelial cell elongation ability.33,34 In addition, PTP has been reported to regulate the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway through dephosphorylation of pik3r2.35 In this study, the expression of ptp-rb and pik3r2 in the zebrafish was inhibited by Deox B 7,4 treatment, which is consistent with the results of the previous studies.

COX-2 and matrix metallopeptidases are the vital regulators of inflammatory angiogenesis; the inhibition of expression of COX-2 and expression of mmp9 has been shown to contribute to reduced angiogenesis in endothelial cells.36 Consistently, our data showed that COX-2 expression in the zebrafish was significantly inhibited by Deox B 7,4 treatment (Figure 4). The expression of mmp9 was substantially up-regulated by Deox B 7,4 treatment, suggesting that the anti-angiogenesis potential of Deox B 7,4 in the zebrafish embryos might not dependent on inhibition of mmp9 expression. However, the molecular mechanism of the upregulation of mmp9 needs further research.

The crucial roles of secreted slit proteins and their respective robo receptors during angiogenesis have been highlighted in a number of studies. Interaction of ROBO1/2 and SLITs, especially SLIT2, favors angiogenesis by promoting endothelial cell motility and cell polarity.37,38 Vertebrate ROBO4 is reported to control angiogenesis and blood vessel permeability.39,40 In human endothelial cells, ROBO1/ROBO4 heterodimer promotes cell migration.41 As a common cause of preeclampsia, hypoxia can significantly enhance the levels of SLIT3, ROBO1, and ROBO4 in placental endothelial cells.42 In this study, the potential anti-angiogenic agent Deox B 7,4 significantly inhibited the expression of slit2, slit3, robo1, robo2, and robo4 in the zebrafish embryos (Figure 4).

The Dll4/Notch signaling pathway controls arterial-venous differentiation and angiogenic tip cell selection during embryonic vascular development.4346 In endothelial cells, activation of dll4/Notch transcriptionally enhances efnb2 expression, while decreased dll4/Notch function leads to ectopic arterial expression of efnb2 and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).47 Furthermore, hey1 and hey2 are also canonical targets of Notch in endothelial cells.4749 In this study, dll4 and Notch-targeted hey2 and efnb2 were markedly down-regulated in the zebrafish embryos by Deox B 7,4 treatment (Figure 4), suggesting Deox B 7,4 treatment may result in AVMs during vascular development.

There were several limitations to this study. First, Deox B 7,4 exhibited multiple severe effects on the zebrafish embryogenesis in this study. Deox B 7,4 treatment not only resulted in the inhibition of ISVs formation but also led to ocular dysplasia and skeletal dysplasia in the zebrafish embryos, suggesting the roles of Deox B 7,4 treatment in the zebrafish embryogenesis are complex and may be involved in multiple mechanisms. Further studies are needed that focus on the side effects caused by Deox B 7,4 treatment and the underlying mechanisms. Second, the safety and the toxicity of Deox B 7,4 treatment for the juvenile zebrafish and the adult zebrafish with full development of major organ systems remain unknown. As a potential anti-angiogenic drug, these effects of Deox B 7,4 treatment should be investigated in future studies. Third, the in vitro anti-angiogenic functions of human endothelial cells were not conducted in this study. Therefore, this is a preliminary study about the anti-angiogenic functions of Deox B 7,4 and much investigation is still warranted before its clinical use.

In conclusion, five leads out of 240 compounds from the Natural Products Collection Library were identified with anti-angiogenic activities. Among them, treatment with Deox B 7,4 inhibited the formation of ISVs in the zebrafish embryos in a dose-dependent manner. The expression profile of angiogenesis-related genes suggested that Deox B 7,4 treatment may exert anti-angiogenic functions by inhibiting the slit2/robo1/2, the slit3/robo4, the cox2/ptp-rb/pik3r2, and the dll4/hey2/efnb2a signaling pathways as well as activation of vegfr-2/fgfr1/mmp9 (Figure 5). Further investigations need to be conducted in the future to unveil how Deox B 7,4 mediates the above-mentioned signaling pathways during vascular development.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Schematic model illustrating the mechanism underlying Deox B 7,4 inhibition on angiogenesis.

Abbreviations: Slit, slit guidance ligand; robo, roundabout guidance receptor; fgfr, fibroblast growth factor receptor; cox2, cyclooxygenase; ptp-rb, protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type B; pik3r2, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 2; dll4, delta-like ligand 4; hey2, Hes-related family basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor with YRPW motif 2; efnb2, ephrin B2; vegfr-2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2; mmp9, matrix metallopeptidase 9.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81500331) and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai (No. 17140902600).

Data Sharing Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study have been included in this published article.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All protocols comply with the guidelines of the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International. The protocol was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Shanghai Research Center for Model Organisms (IACUC No. 2015-0022).

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this work.

References

  • 1.Acunzo M, Romano G, Wernicke D, Croce CM. MicroRNA and cancer – a brief overview. Adv Biol Regul. 2015;57:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2014.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Birbrair A, Zhang T, Wang ZM, et al. Type-2 pericytes participate in normal and tumoral angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2014;307(1):C25–38. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00084.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rajabi M, Mousa SA. The role of angiogenesis in cancer treatment. Biomedicines. 2017;5(2):34. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines5020034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nishida N, Yano H, Nishida T, Kamura T, Kojiro M. Angiogenesis in cancer. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(3):213–219. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.3.213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mousa SA, Davis PJ. Angiogenesis and Anti-Angiogenesis Strategies in Cancer Therapeutics. Academic Press; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shen B. A new golden age of natural products drug discovery. Cell. 2015;163(6):1297–1300. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. J Nat Prod. 2012;75(3):311–335. doi: 10.1021/np200906s [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Parng C, Seng WL, Semino C, McGrath P. Zebrafish: a preclinical model for drug screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2002;1(1 Pt 1):41–48. doi: 10.1089/154065802761001293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mandrekar N, Thakur NL. Significance of the zebrafish model in the discovery of bioactive molecules from nature. Biotechnol Lett. 2009;31(2):171–179. doi: 10.1007/s10529-008-9868-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crawford AD, Liekens S, Kamuhabwa AR, et al. Zebrafish bioassay-guided natural product discovery: isolation of angiogenesis inhibitors from East African medicinal plants. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e14694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pantel J, Williams SY, Mi D, et al. Development of a high throughput screen for allosteric modulators of melanocortin-4 receptor signaling using a real time camp assay. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;660(1):139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.01.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cross LM, Cook MA, Lin S, Chen J-N, Rubinstein AL. Rapid analysis of angiogenesis drugs in a live fluorescent zebrafish assay. Arterioscle Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(5):911–912. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000068685.72914.7E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang C, Tao W, Wang Y, et al. Rosuvastatin, identified from a zebrafish chemical genetic screen for antiangiogenic compounds, suppresses the growth of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2010;58(3):418–426. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen K, Wang C, Fan Y, et al. Identification of mundoserone by zebrafish in vivo screening as a natural product with anti-angiogenic activity. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(6):4562–4568. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203(3):253–310. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002030302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lawson ND, Weinstein BM. In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2002;248(2):307–318. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chan J, Bayliss PE, Wood JM, Roberts TM. Dissection of angiogenic signaling in zebrafish using a chemical genetic approach. Cancer Cell. 2002;1(3):257–267. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00042-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu H, Zhang Y, Pena MM, Pirisi L, Creek KE. Six1 promotes colorectal cancer growth and metastasis by stimulating angiogenesis and recruiting tumor-associated macrophages. Carcinogenesis. 2017;38(3):281–292. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgw121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Malecic N, Young HS. Excessive angiogenesis associated with psoriasis as a cause for cardiovascular ischaemia. Exp Dermatol. 2017;26(4):299–304. doi: 10.1111/exd.13310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Abu El-Asrar AM, Struyf S, Mohammad G, et al. Osteoprotegerin is a new regulator of inflammation and angiogenesis in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(7):3189–3201. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lu Y, Yu SS, Zong M, et al. Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (g6pi) mediates hypoxia-induced angiogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40274. doi: 10.1038/srep40274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rakhila H, Al-Akoum M, Bergeron ME, et al. Promotion of angiogenesis and proliferation cytokines patterns in peritoneal fluid from women with endometriosis. J Reprod Immunol. 2016;116:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2016.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liang F, Han Y, Gao H, et al. Kaempferol identified by zebrafish assay and fine fractionations strategy from dysosma versipellis inhibits angiogenesis through VEGF and FGF pathways. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14468. doi: 10.1038/srep14468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang GW, Jiang JS, Lu WQ. Ferulic acid exerts anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activity by targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-mediated angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(10):24011–24031. doi: 10.3390/ijms161024011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhao D, Qin C, Fan X, Li Y, Gu B. Inhibitory effects of quercetin on angiogenesis in larval zebrafish and human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;723:360–367. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.10.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Oh WK, McDermott D, Porta C, et al. Angiogenesis inhibitor therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma: toxicity and treatment patterns in clinical practice from a global medical chart review. Int J Oncol. 2014;44(1):5–16. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.2181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Motzer RJ, Porta C, Vogelzang NJ, et al. Dovitinib versus sorafenib for third-line targeted treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an open-label, randomised Phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):286–296. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70030-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pitchai A, Rajaretinam RK, Freeman JL. Zebrafish as an emerging model for bioassay-guided natural product drug discovery for neurological disorders. Medicines (Basel). 2019;6(2):61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Crawford AD, Esguerra CV, de Witte PA. Fishing for drugs from nature: zebrafish as a technology platform for natural product discovery. Planta Med. 2008;74(6):624–632. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lam HW, Lin HC, Lao SC, et al. The angiogenic effects of angelica sinensis extract on huvec in vitro and zebrafish in vivo. J Cell Biochem. 2008;103(1):195–211. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bernard D, Gebbia M, Prabha S, et al. Select microtubule inhibitors increase lysosome acidity and promote lysosomal disruption in acute myeloid leukemia (aml) cells. Apoptosis. 2015;20(7):948–959. doi: 10.1007/s10495-015-1123-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cross MJ, Claesson-Welsh L. FGF and VEGF function in angiogenesis: signalling pathways, biological responses and therapeutic inhibition. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22(4):201–207. doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01676-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hatanaka K, Lanahan AA, Murakami M, Simons M, Ushio-Fukai M. Fibroblast growth factor signaling potentiates ve-cadherin stability at adherens junctions by regulating shp2. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sauteur L, Krudewig A, Herwig L, et al. Cdh5/ve-cadherin promotes endothelial cell interface elongation via cortical actin polymerization during angiogenic sprouting. Cell Rep. 2014;9(2):504–513. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pestell RG. New roles of cyclin d1. Am J Pathol. 2013;183(1):3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Scoditti E, Calabriso N, Massaro M, et al. Mediterranean diet polyphenols reduce inflammatory angiogenesis through mmp-9 and cox-2 inhibition in human vascular endothelial cells: a potentially protective mechanism in atherosclerotic vascular disease and cancer. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012;527(2):81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dubrac A, Genet G, Ola R, et al. Targeting nck-mediated endothelial cell front-rear polarity inhibits neovascularization. Circulation. 2016;133(4):409–421. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rama N, Dubrac A, Mathivet T, et al. Slit2 signaling through robo1 and robo2 is required for retinal neovascularization. Nat Med. 2015;21(5):483–491. doi: 10.1038/nm.3849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bedell VM, Yeo SY, Park KW, et al. Roundabout4 is essential for angiogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(18):6373–6378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408318102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jones CA, Nishiya N, London NR, et al. Slit2-robo4 signalling promotes vascular stability by blocking arf6 activity. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(11):1325–1331. doi: 10.1038/ncb1976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sheldon H, Andre M, Legg JA, et al. Active involvement of robo1 and robo4 in filopodia formation and endothelial cell motility mediated via wasp and other actin nucleation-promoting factors. FASEB J. 2009;23(2):513–522. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-098269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liao WX, Laurent LC, Agent S, Hodges J, Chen DB. Human placental expression of slit/robo signaling cues: effects of preeclampsia and hypoxia. Biol Reprod. 2012;86(4):111. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.088138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lawson ND, Scheer N, Pham VN, et al. Notch signaling is required for arterial-venous differentiation during embryonic vascular development. Development. 2001;128(19):3675–3683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hellstrom M, Phng LK, Hofmann JJ, et al. Dll4 signalling through notch1 regulates formation of tip cells during angiogenesis. Nature. 2007;445(7129):776–780. doi: 10.1038/nature05571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Siekmann AF, Lawson ND. Notch signalling limits angiogenic cell behaviour in developing zebrafish arteries. Nature. 2007;445(7129):781–784. doi: 10.1038/nature05577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shirota H, Klinman DM. Recent progress concerning cpg DNA and its use as a vaccine adjuvant. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2014;13(2):299–312. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2014.863715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Iso T, Maeno T, Oike Y, et al. Dll4-selective notch signaling induces ephrinb2 gene expression in endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;341(3):708–714. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Taylor KL, Henderson AM, Hughes CC. Notch activation during endothelial cell network formation in vitro targets the basic hlh transcription factor hesr-1 and downregulates vegfr-2/kdr expression. Microvasc Res. 2002;64(3):372–383. doi: 10.1006/mvre.2002.2443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rochon ER, Wright DS, Schubert MM, Roman BL. Context-specific interactions between notch and alk1 cannot explain alk1-associated arteriovenous malformations. Cardiovasc Res. 2015;107(1):143–152. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvv148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Drug Design, Development and Therapy are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES