Skip to main content
Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis logoLink to Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
. 2016 Jun 1;23(6):728–736. doi: 10.5551/jat.31963

Association of Changes in Neck Circumference with Cardiometabolic Risk in Postmenopausal Healthy Women

Satomi Aoi 1, Takashi Miyake 2, Tadayuki Iida 1, Hiromi Ikeda 1, Fumiko Ishizaki 3, Chiho Chikamura 1, Noriko Tamura 1, Yumiko Nitta 4, Toshihide Harada 1, Hideki Miyaguchi 5,
PMCID: PMC7399285  PMID: 26797264

Abstract

Aim: Although neck circumference (NC) is thought to predict obesity-related metabolic abnormality, its causal role in cardiometabolic risk is unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of changes in NC on cardiometabolic risk in healthy postmenopausal women through a community-based longitudinal study.

Methods: From a local community in Japan, 63 generally healthy postmenopausal women were recruited. All participants received an assessment of obesity-related anthropometric markers, biochemical parameters, and hemodynamic measures and were followed on average for 3 years.

Results: At baseline analysis, larger NC was positively associated with atherosclerosis-related markers, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and blood pressure, as well as some lipid parameters. After the follow-up period, change in NC was associated with changes in body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, and waist circumference (WC). Interestingly, significant correlations of change in NC with changes in baPWV and blood pressure were observed, whereas changes in WC and BMI were only associated with changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and/or total cholesterol. In multivariate linear regression analysis, change in NC was significantly associated with changes in baPWV and systolic blood pressure, independent of changes in BMI, WC, and biochemical parameters. In addition, an increase in NC was associated with a 2.69-fold increased odds ratio of accelerated baPWV.

Conclusions: Change in NC was independently associated with changes in atherosclerosis-related markers. These observations suggest that NC is an important predictor of the risk of developing obesity-related atherosclerosis in healthy postmenopausal women.

Keywords: Neck circumference, Obesity, Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, Atherosclerosis

Introduction

Despite advances in medical and surgical procedures, coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the elderly. Although CAD is rare in young women, the incidence of CAD rapidly rises postmenopause because of estrogen deficiency1, 2). However, an early diagnosis of CAD is difficult in some women because older women with CAD often present with atypical symptoms, and noninvasive analysis for detecting CAD, such as exercise ECG, is less accurate3, 4). Consequently, the incidence of sudden cardiac death without CAD history and silent myocardial infarction is higher in women than in men5, 6). Therefore, the management of CAD in post-menopausal women is an imperative clinical problem. Responses to postmenopausal estrogen loss are linked to the pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome1, 2). Estrogen level is negatively correlated with body mass index (BMI) and abdominal fat accumulation in postmenopausal women, leading to an increased incidence of metabolic syndrome during and after menopause1). In addition, several clinical studies have reported the importance of obesity as a determinant of CAD in women7). To enable early therapeutic intervention against the development of CAD, risk assessment of obesity-related atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women is important in clinical practice because cardiovascular diseases mainly occur because of atherosclerosis progression.

Obesity is a potent mediator of an adverse metabolic profile and increases the risk of metabolic disorders including CAD79). However, obesity-related risk can be restored by early therapeutic intervention such as exercise for weight loss. To identify obesity in individuals, BMI, waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio are widely available as simple surrogate measures because the accurate assessment of fat distribution using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) is impractical in a clinical setting. However, these markers do not completely characterize fat topology and exhibit problems in reproducibility1012). Therefore, additional methods capable of improving metabolic disease risk assessment beyond traditional anthropometric measures are awaited. Recently, the neck fat depot has emerged as a potent predictor of metabolic disease independent of visceral and whole body obesity, and measurement of neck circumference (NC) was confirmed to reflect the amount of neck fat depot as assessed using CT or MRI1317). Indeed, our previous study also showed the ability of NC measurement to identify obesity-related metabolic abnormality18).

On the basis of these observations, we thought that NC measurement would be useful for clinical screening to evaluate the risk of atherosclerosis in postmenopausal healthy women. However, the causal role of NC in the development of cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women is unclear because several previous studies were conducted in a cross-sectional setting. The aim of this study was to clarify whether changes in NC influence cardiometabolic risk and whether NC measurement can predict atherosclerosis progression for the primary prevention of CAD in postmenopausal women, through a community-based longitudinal study.

Methods

Study Population

The participants were 63 generally healthy postmenopausal women who were recruited from a local community, Mihara city, in Japan. All subjects participated on their own free will and attended our medical center for risk-screening tests of metabolic syndrome. These participants underwent the assessment of cardiometabolic risk factors twice a year and were followed on average for 3.03 ± 0.46 years between December 2010 and June 2014. All participants were free of clinical chronic disease and medication use such as estrogen replacement therapy and diuretics. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee.

Anthropometric Measurements

Height, body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, WC, and NC were evaluated in all participants as anthropometric measurements. Height was measured to the nearest 1 mm using a stadiometer with no shoes and the head held in the Frankfurt horizontal plane, and weight was assessed to the nearest 0.1 kg using a digital scale with no outerwear or shoes. BMI was calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m2). Body fat percentage was determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis using a body fat meter. Both WC and NC were measured to the nearest 1 mm using a flexible tape measure. WC was measured at the level of the umbilicus in a standing position. NC was measured in a seated position at the level of the mid-neck, positioned just below the laryngeal prominence and spinous process of the 7th cervical vertebra.

Laboratory Assessments

After an overnight fast, a blood sample was collected from each participant for the measurement of biochemical parameters related to metabolic disorders. Serum triglyceride (TG), total-cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were measured for lipid profile analysis. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured to evaluate glucose metabolism using a standard biochemical procedure.

Measurement of Blood Pressure and Pulse Wave Velocity

Every participant was rested in a supine position for at least 5 min in a quiet room before measuring blood pressure and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV). Blood pressure was measured at both brachial arteries using a digital sphygmomanometer, and the mean of these measurements was used as the average blood pressure. baPWV was measured using a volume-plethysmographic system (Form/ABI; Colin Co. Ltd., Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and the average of bilateral recordings of baPWV was used for analysis.

Statistical Analysis

All values are expressed as mean ± standard division (SD). All tests were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Anthropometric measurements, including NC, WC, and BMI, were normally distributed. TC, TG, and HbA1c were log-transformed to improve the normality of their distribution. For statistical analysis, Student's t test was used for comparison of continuous variables. Associations among the anthropometric measurements and cardiometabolic risk factors or their changes were assessed using an age-adjusted Pearson's correlation coefficient. To adjust for the effects of covariates and further clarify independent relationships, we performed a multivariate linear regression analysis. In this model, we initially adjusted for covariates (age and changes in heart rate and/or mean blood pressure) and then evaluated independent variables to estimate the relative contribution of these variables and the variability of the dependent variables. Finally, we performed a multivariate logistic regression of dichotomous data for baPWV (increase or no increase during the follow-up period) after adjusting for age and change in heart rate to determine the size of the effect of variables as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. In this model, independent variables were changes in NC, WC, BMI, and biochemical parameters. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., IL).

Results

Subject Characteristics

The characteristics of the 63 participants in this study are presented in Table 1. All subjects were postmenopausal women in the local community and had a history of natural menopausal transition. All participants were nonsmokers and had similar lifestyles and backgrounds including age. Amongst these participants, 4 subjects had WC of 90 cm or greater, 11 had systolic blood pressure (SBP) of > 140 mmHg, and 14 had dyslipidemia (TG > 150 mg/dL or HDL-C < 40 mg/dL) at baseline. Mean BMI, WC, and NC were 22.1, 79.1 cm, and 33.1 cm respectively, and mean baPWV was 1518.1 cm/second at baseline. Although the presence of peripheral arterial disease affects baPWV, there were no subjects with low ankle brachial index (< 0.9).

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of study participants.

Baseline values
(mean ± SD)
Follow-up values
(mean ± SD)
p value
Age (years) 62.4 ± 7.1 65.2 ± 7.1 0.001
Height (cm) 153.5 ± 4.9 153.2 ± 4.8 0.004
Body weight (kg) 52.0 ± 8.0 52.0 ± 8.6 0.873
Body fat percentage (%) 33.0 ± 6.1 32.7 ± 7.5 0.373
Body mass index 22.1 ± 3.3 22.2 ± 3.5 0.519
Waist circumference (cm) 79.1 ± 9.6 81.8 ± 10.2 0.001
Neck circumference (cm) 33.1 ± 1.5 33.1 ± 1.9 0.730
baPWV (cm/sec) 1518.1 ± 274.2 1572.6 ± 333.8 0.025
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 128.2 ± 19.2 130.3 ± 21.5 0.243
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 73.4 ± 11.1 72.9 ± 12.3 0.712
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 106.8 ± 58.3 108.9 ± 47.5 0.703
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 212.1 ± 26.5 218.7 ± 29.2 0.048
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 118.4 ± 24.4 127.7 ± 26.4 0.001
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 71.1 ± 17.6 71.64 ± 18.0 0.858
HbA1c (%) 5.62 ± 0.37 5.65 ± 0.47 0.490

baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; LDL-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c.

After the follow-up period, WC, baPWV, TC, and LDL-C were significantly increased, and height was decreased as compared with baseline values. In contrast, there were no significant changes in body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, NC, TG, HDL-C, HbA1c, and blood pressure.

Correlations Among Anthropometric Markers and Metabolic Risk Factors at Baseline

We investigated the correlations among obesity-related anthropometric measurements using baseline values (Table 2). Age-adjusted Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated that NC and WC were significantly associated with anthropometric markers of whole body adiposity, BMI, and body fat percentage. In addition, a strong association between NC and WC was found at baseline. These observations indicate that NC was related to not only upper-body subcutaneous fat accumulation but also whole body and visceral fat accumulation.

Table 2. Correlations among anthropometric markers and cardio-metabolic risk factors at baseline, adjusted for age.

NC
WC
BMI
r p r p r p
Height −0.057 0.658 −0.088 0.495 −0.103 0.420
Body weight 0.689 0.001 0.812 0.001 0.922 0.001
Body fat percentage 0.741 0.001 0.863 0.001 0.922 0.001
BMI 0.744 0.001 0.883 0.001 ----------
WC 0.739 0.001 ---------- 0.883 0.001
NC ---------- 0.739 0.001 0.744 0.001
baPWV 0.349 0.005 0.194 0.128 0.206 0.105
SBP 0.359 0.004 0.309 0.014 0.261 0.039
DBP 0.278 0.027 0.259 0.040 0.200 0.115
TG 0.155 0.230 0.053 0.685 0.018 0.892
TC −0.182 0.157 −0.154 0.232 −0.193 0.132
LDL-C −0.036 0.782 0.018 0.887 −0.028 0.830
HDL-C −0.286 0.024 −0.257 0.044 −0.283 0.026
HbA1c 0.404 0.001 0.282 0.027 0.324 0.010

BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; NC, neck circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol.

The associations of anthropometric markers with hemodynamic measures and biochemical parameters were also investigated after adjusting for age (Table 2). Whereas both SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were correlated with NC and WC, baPWV was associated with NC only. Analysis of lipid and glucose metabolism demonstrated that NC, WC, and BMI negatively correlated with HDL-C, and HbA1c positively associated with these anthropometric markers.

Correlations Among Changes in Anthropometric Markers and Metabolic Risk Factors

To further clarify the ability of NC measurements to identify metabolic risk, we investigated the associations among changes in anthropometric markers, biochemical parameters, and hemodynamic measures using an age-adjusted Pearson's correlation coefficient. Although significant associations among changes in NC, WC, and BMI were observed, correlation coefficients were lower than those of baseline analysis. Interestingly, changes in NC, WC, and BMI were related to different medical conditions. Although subclinical atherosclerosis was evaluated by measuring baPWV and blood pressure, change in baPWV was associated with changes in NC (r = 0.537, p = 0.001) and BMI (r = 0.309, p = 0.014), and change in SBP correlated with change in NC only (r = 0.315, p = 0.012). In addition, change in baPWV was also associated with change in SBP (r = 0.448, p = 0.001). There were no associations between change in DBP and anthropometric markers (Fig. 1 and Table 3). In contrast, changes in lipid parameters correlated with changes in WC and BMI but not with change in NC. Change in WC was only associated with change in LDL-C, whereas change in BMI correlated with changes in TC and LDL-C. No significant association was observed between changes in anthropometric measures and change in HbA1c (Table 3).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Correlations between changes in anthropometric markers and hemodynamic measures

Change in baPWV was positively associated with changes in NC and BMI, and change in SBP correlated with change in NC only.

NC, neck circumference; WC, waist circumference; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity.

Table 3. Associations of changes in anthropometric markers with changes in cardio-metabolic risk factors, adjusted for age.

Change in NC
Change in WC
Change in BMI
r p r p r p
Height −0.007 0.954 −0.130 0.308 −0.085 0.506
Body weight 0.372 0.003 0.474 0.001 0.957 0.001
Body fat percentage 0.278 0.027 0.352 0.005 0.684 0.001
BMI 0.385 0.002 0.522 0.001 ----------
WC 0.254 0.045 ---------- 0.522 0.001
NC ---------- 0.254 0.045 0.385 0.002
baPWV 0.537 0.001 0.017 0.893 0.309 0.014
SBP 0.315 0.012 0.126 0.323 0.178 0.162
DBP 0.168 0.188 0.142 0.268 0.111 0.385
TG 0.065 0.616 0.085 0.510 0.120 0.355
TC 0.211 0.100 0.081 0.529 0.387 0.002
LDL-C 0.176 0.172 0.264 0.038 0.517 0.001
HDL-C 0.154 0.231 0.149 0.247 0.192 0.136
HbA1c −0.090 0.485 0.013 0.921 −0.080 0.535

Based on the correlation analysis, we focused on the association of changes in NC and atherosclerosis-related factors; subsequently, we performed multivariate linear regression analysis after adjusting for age and changes in heart rate and mean blood pressure (Table 4). In this analysis, change in NC was independently associated with changes in baPWV and SBP. However, changes in WC, BMI, and biochemical parameters were not associated with changes in atherosclerosis-related factors. In contrast, change in WC, but not change in NC, was independently correlated with change in LDL-C (β = 0.277, p = 0.026), and change in BMI was independently associated with changes in TC (β = 0.314, p = 0.004) and LDL-C (β = 0.493, p = 0.001).

Table 4. Multivariate linear regression analysis between changes in hemodynamic markers and cardio-metabolic risk factors.

Change in baPWV
Change in SBP
β p R2 β p R2
Model 1
    NC 0.411 0.001 0.392 0.346 0.008 0.073
Model 2
    NC 0.372 0.002 0.424 0.314 0.029 0.046
    WC −0.216 0.066 0.044 0.769
    BMI 0.240 0.051 0.052 0.737
Model 3
    NC 0.335 0.002 0.461 0.376 0.007 0.036
    LDL-C 0.112 0.298 −0.081 0.572
    HDL-C 0.200 0.062 −0.061 0.665
    HbA1c −0.134 0.207 0.021 0.881

Change in baPWV, adjusted for age and changes in mean blood pressure and heart rate; Change in SBP, adjusted for age and change in heart rate.

Finally, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the influence of change in NC on baPWV. After adjusting for age and change in heart rate, an increase in NC was associated with a 2.69-fold increased odds ratio of accelerated baPWV, and an increase in SBP was also associated with a 1.13-fold increased odds ratio of accelerated baPWV (Table 5).

Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression of risk factors for increased baPWV.

OR 95% CI p value
Change in NC 2.694 1.348–5.387 0.005
Change in WC 0.881 0.727–1.067 0.195
Change in BMI 1.297 0.907–1.855 0.154
Change in SBP 1.125 1.020–1.241 0.018
Change in LDL 0.993 0.921–1.071 0.856
Change in HDL 1.064 0.973–1.163 0.173

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

In this study, we examined the correlations of NC and its change with metabolic risk factors in community-based postmenopausal women in Japan and found that change in NC, but not changes in WC and BMI, was independently associated with changes in arteriosclerosis-related factors, baPWV, and blood pressure. These observations suggest that NC is an important surrogate marker to identify the early phase of atherosclerosis associated with obesity in healthy postmenopausal women.

The measurement of WC is a first step to recognize metabolic syndrome because it reflects the adverse metabolic profile associated with excess visceral fat accumulation19, 20). However, recent studies demonstrated that NC is also an independent predictor of metabolic abnormality1318). Indeed, the present study showed that NC was related to an adverse metabolic profile including low HDL-C and high HbA1c levels at baseline. In addition, we investigated the associations of NC with atherosclerosis-related factors because the primary prevention of CAD is based on the assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in individuals.

In this study, we utilized baPWV and blood pressure to assess atherosclerosis noninvasively, and NC was significantly associated with baPWV, SBP, and DBP at baseline. PWV is well known to reflect the elasticity of segmental arteries, providing an estimate of arterial stiffness21). Accelerated arterial stiffness is mainly due to the degeneration of the elastic layer, increased collagen in the central arterial wall and vascular dysfunction. Arterial stiffness reflects advanced arteriosclerosis, which precedes overt atherosclerosis, and arteriosclerosis progression is closely related to the incidence of cardiovascular diseases22, 23). In addition, a large part of the structural and functional changes of arterial stiffness is thought to be linked to the early phase of atherosclerosis24, 25). Carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) is widely used to assess central arterial stiffness. However, the measurement of cfPWV has some limitations for use in clinical screening because it is necessary to have relatively high skills and to expose the inguinal region for measurement, resulting in a lengthy measuring time. In contrast, because baPWV is calculated by measuring the pulse wave of the brachial and tibial arteries, the measurement can be easily and quickly performed compared with cfPWV and shows high reproducibility26). In addition, several clinical studies showed a strong association between baPWV and cfPWV or aortic PWV, and baPWV has been shown to predict future cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality above and beyond traditional risk factors2729). Therefore, the measurement of baPWV is thought to be suitable for clinical practice and screening to detect subclinical atherosclerosis.

To clarify the impact of increased NC on metabolic risk, we evaluated the changes in anthropometric measurements and metabolic risk factors in the same subject. As a result, change in NC was independently associated with changes in baPWV and SBP, and an increase in NC was associated with a 2.69-fold increased odds ratio of accelerated baPWV. However, changes in WC or BMI were not associated with change in baPWV despite the fact that a significant association was found among changes in NC, WC, and BMI. A large part of the effect of increased NC on metabolic risk is thought to relate to the whole body or visceral adiposity. However, the associations between changes in NC, WC, and BMI were reduced as compared with those of baseline analysis. Therefore, NC could rapidly increase in response to an increase in upper-body adiposity as compared with WC and BMI.

The accuracy of NC measurement might make it possible that change in NC can predict changes in baPWV and SBP. In the present study, measurement of NC was performed using two anatomic landmarks. This procedure can easily determine the location for measuring NC, resulting in high reproducibility and accuracy with a short measurement time. In addition, although the measurement of WC is influenced by postprandial and respiratory abdominal expansion, the value of NC is not affected by these physiological problems. Consequently, NC measurement could actually detect a slight increase in neck fat accumulation associated with upper-body obesity.

Recently, the role of subcutaneous adipocytes in metabolic abnormalities has received considerable attention. Excess upper-body subcutaneous adipose tissue can increase the secretion of angiotensinogen and proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 and TNF-α. Several studies demonstrated that these inflammatory biomarkers are significantly associated with arterial stiffness3032). In addition, recent studies using FDG-PET/CT demonstrated that metabolic activity and inflammation in upper-body subcutaneous adipose tissue, including the neck fat depot, were increased in obese individuals33). Furthermore, the inflammation of neck subcutaneous adipose tissue was significantly associated with increased inflammatory activity in the arterial wall34). Inflammatory stimuli enhance the secretion and activation of several proteases and cytokines in the arterial wall. These inflammatory factors are thought to induce medial degeneration, such as the destruction of the elastic layer and collagen deposition, leading to accelerated arteriosclerosis32). Therefore, the accumulation of neck or upper-body adipose tissue might be associated with obesity-related atherosclerosis progression through inducing an inflammatory response in the arterial wall.

On the other hand, dyslipidemia plays an important role in the process of atherogenesis. The pathology of atherosclerotic lesions is characterized by lipid deposition in the arterial wall, and this structural change results from increased lipid concentrations in blood. Therefore, lipid parameters are considered to be atherosclerosis markers. However, change in NC was not significantly associated with changes in lipid parameters during the follow-up period (3 years), although some lipid parameters correlated with NC at the baseline. In contrast, changes in WC and BMI were associated with changes in TC and/or LDL-C. Free fatty acids and glycerol can be stored as TG in subcutaneous adipocytes in nonobese subjects, and the visceral fat depot is thought to be increased after the disruption of this buffering effect of subcutaneous adipose tissue30). Therefore, changes in lipid parameters are closely associated with visceral fat accumulation. These observations suggest that NC is a more sensitive predictor of arteriosclerosis than are WC and BMI, and WC is mainly associated with atherosclerosis progression.

This study has one limitation. In contrast to our study, it has been reported that change in NC was associated with changes in lipid parameters16). This opposing result might be explained by the distinct age, menopausal state, or ethnicity of the study population. However, because of the small sample size in our study, we cannot exclude the possibility that the associations of changes in anthropometric measurements with lipid parameters were underestimated in the statistical analysis. Therefore, a longitudinal cohort study with a large population will be needed to clarify the precise role of NC in cardiovascular risk estimates.

Conclusion

NC was independently and sensitively predictive of arteriosclerosis progression among obesity-related anthropometric indices. Measurement of NC could be useful to identify individuals with a high risk of developing obesity-related atherosclerosis amongst healthy postmenopausal women, leading to the determination of an appropriate time for therapeutic intervention against the development of CAD.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1). Cignarella A, Kratz M, Bolego C: Emerging role of estrogen in the control of cardiometabolic disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2010; 31: 183-189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2). Carr MC: The emergence of the metabolic syndrome with menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2003; 88: 2404-2411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3). Solimene MC: Coronary heart disease in women: a challenge for the 21st century. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2010; 65: 99-106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4). Gulati M, Shaw LJ, Bairey Merz CN: Myocardial ischemia in women: lessons from the NHLBI WISE study. Clin Cardiol, 2012; 35: 141-148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5). Lerner DJ, Kannel WB: Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J, 1986; 111: 383-390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6). Ni H, Coady S, Rosamond W, Folsom AR, Chambless L, Russell SD, Sorlie PD: Trends from 1987 to 2004 in sudden death due to coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am Heart J, 2009; 157: 46-52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7). Manson JE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Rosner B, Monson RR, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH: A prospective study of obesity and risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med, 1990; 322: 882-889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8). Wilson PW, Kannel WB, Silbershatz H, D'Agostino RB: Clustering of metabolic factors and coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med, 1999; 159: 1104-1109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9). Ross R, Freeman J, Hudson R, Janssen I: Abdominal obesity, muscle composition, and insulin resistance in premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2002; 87: 5044-5051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10). Ross R, Rissanen J, Hudson R: Sensitivity associated with the identification of visceral adipose tissue levels using waist circumference in men and women: effects of weight loss. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 1996; 20: 533-538 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11). Pou KM, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Lieb K, Vasan RS, O'Donnell CJ, Fox CS: Patterns of abdominal fat distribution: the Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes Care, 2009; 32: 481-485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12). Freedman DS, Rimm AA: The relation of body fat distribution, as assessed by six girth measurements, to diabetes mellitus in women. Am J Public Health, 1989; 79: 715-720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13). Torriani M, Gill CM, Daley S, Oliveira AL, Azevedo DC, Bredella MA: Compartmental neck fat accumulation and its relation to cardiovascular risk and metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr, 2014; 100: 1244-1251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14). Kawaguchi Y, Fukumoto S, Inaba M, Koyama H, Shoji T, Shoji S, Nishizawa Y: Different impacts of neck circumference and visceral obesity on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2011; 19: 276-282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15). Preis SR, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, D'Agostino RB, Sr, Levy D, Robins SJ, Meigs JB, Vasan RS, O'Donnell CJ, Fox CS: Neck circumference as a novel measure of cardiometabolic risk: the Framingham Heart study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010; 95: 3701-3710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16). Ben-Noun LL, Laor A: Relationship between changes in neck circumference and cardiovascular risk factors. Exp Clin Cardiol, 2006; 11: 14-20 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17). Zhou JY, Ge H, Zhu MF, Wang LJ, Chen L, Tan YZ, Chen YM, Zhu HL: Neck circumference as an independent predictive contributor to cardio-metabolic syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2013; 12: 76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18). Aoi S, Miyake T, Harada T, Ishizaki F, Ikeda H, Nitta Y, Iida T, Chikamura C, Tamura N, Nitta K, Miyaguchi H: Neck circumference has possibility as a predictor for metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. Hiroshima J Med Sci, 2014; 63: 27-32 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19). Zhu S, Wang Z, Heshka S, Heo M, Faith MS, Heymsfield SB: Waist circumference and obesity-associated risk factors among whites in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: clinical action thresholds. Am J Clin Nutr, 2002; 76: 743-749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20). Pouliot MC, Després JP, Lemieux S, Moorjani S, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Lupien PJ: Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol, 1994; 73: 460-468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21). Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, Rasmussen S, Thijs L, Ibsen H, Jeppesen J: Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population. Circulation, 2006; 113: 664-670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22). Torii S, Arima H, Ohkubo T, Fujiyoshi A, Kadota A, Takashima N, Kadowaki S, Hisamatsu T, Saito Y, Miyagawa N, Zaid M, Murakami Y, Abbott RD, Horie M, Miura K, Ueshima H, SESSA Research Group : Association between pulse wave velocity and coronary artery calcification in Japanese men. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2015; in press [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23). Gomez-Sanchez L, Garcia-Ortiz L, Patino-Alonso MC, Recio-Rodriguez JI, Frontera G, Ramos R, Martí R, Agudo-Conde C, Rodriguez-Sanchez E, Maderuelo-Fernández JA, Gomez-Marcos MA: The association between the cardio-ankle vascular index and other parameters of vascular structure and function in Caucasian adults: MARK study. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2015; 22: 901-911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24). Ter Avest E, Stalenhoef AF, de Graaf J: What is the role of non-invasive measurements of atherosclerosis in individual cardiovascular risk prediction? Clin Sci (Lond), 2007; 112: 507-516 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25). Liang J, Wang Y, Li H, Liu X, Qiu Q, Qi L: Neck circumference and early stage atherosclerosis: the cardiometabolic risk in Chinese (CRC) study. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2014; 13: 107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26). Yamashina A, Tomiyama H, Takeda K, Tsuda H, Arai T, Hirose K, Koji Y, Hori S, Yamamoto Y: Validity, reproducibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement. Hypertens Res, 2002; 25: 359-364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27). Tomiyama H, Koji Y, Yambe M, Shiina K, Motobe K, Yamada J, Shido N, Tanaka N, Chikamori T, Yamashina A: Brachial -- ankle pulse wave velocity is a simple and independent predictor of prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circ J, 2005; 69: 815-822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28). Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Terentes-Printzios D, Ioakeimidis N, Stefanadis C: Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with brachial-ankle elasticity index: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension, 2012; 60: 556-562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29). Lee HS, Kim HL, Kim H, Hwang D, Choi HM, Oh SW, Seo JB, Chung WY, Kim SH, Kim MA, Zo JH: Incremental prognostic value of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity to single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2015; 22: 1040-1050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30). Summers LK: Adipose tissue metabolism, diabetes and vascular disease--lessons from in vivo studies. Diab Vasc Dis Res, 2006; 3: 12-21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31). Montague CT, Prins JB, Sanders L, Zhang J, Sewter CP, Digby J, Byrne CD, O'Rahilly S: Depot-related gene expression in human subcutaneous and omental adipocytes. Diabetes, 1998; 47: 1384-1391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32). Jain S, Khera R, Corrales-Medina VF, Townsend RR, Chirinos JA: Inflammation and arterial stiffness in humans. Atherosclerosis, 2014; 237: 381-390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33). Tahara N, Yamagishi S, Kodama N, Tahara A, Honda A, Nitta Y, Igata S, Matsui T, Takeuchi M, Kaida H, Kurata S, Abe T, Fukumoto Y: Clinical and biochemical factors associated with area and metabolic activity in the visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues by FDG-PET/CT. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2015; 100: E739-747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34). Bucerius J, Mani V, Wong S, Moncrieff C, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Machac J, Fuster V, Farkouh ME, Rudd JH, Fayad ZA: Arterial and fat tissue inflammation are highly correlated: a prospective 18F-FDG PET/CT study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2014; 41: 934-945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis are provided here courtesy of Japan Atherosclerosis Society

RESOURCES