Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
letter
. 2020 Aug 4;24:481. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03171-3

Plasma exchange in critically ill COVID-19 patients

Christian Morath 1,, Markus A Weigand 2, Martin Zeier 1, Claudius Speer 1, Shilpa Tiwari-Heckler 3, Uta Merle 3,
PMCID: PMC7399583  PMID: 32753056

The spectrum of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ranges from asymptomatic infection to respiratory failure and death of patients [1]. Severely affected patients may develop a cytokine storm-like clinical syndrome with multi-organ failure and a mortality rate of up to 90% [2]. Recently, it has been suggested that plasma exchange (PE) may positively influence this unfavorable course [3].

Here we report on five COVID-19 patients with a median age of 67 years who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit of Heidelberg University Hospital due to respiratory failure. Patients who had received at least one PE until May 15, 2020, were considered for analysis with clinical follow-up until June 15, 2020. Prophylactic antibiotic (piperacillin/tazobactam), antimycotic (caspofungin), and antiviral/immunomodulatory therapy (hydroxychloroquine or maraviroc) was initiated in all patients upon admission according to center practice. Additional treatments that were administered in some distance to PE are given in Table 1. During the course of the disease, patients developed vasopressor-dependent circulatory shock and/or persistent refractory fever (> 40.5 °C) together with increased interleukin 6 levels compatible with the cytokine storm-like clinical syndrome. In addition, all patients had multi-organ failure with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, 4 severe, 1 moderate) and acute kidney injury of at least KDIGO stage 2. A single PE with a median of 3.39 L of fresh frozen plasma was initiated in all patients followed by one additional treatment in patients 1, 3, and 5. During the PE, striking reduction of inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (− 47%, P = 0.0078) and interleukin 6 (− 74%, P = 0.0078), as well as significant reduction of ferritin (− 49%, P = 0.0078), LDH (− 41%, P = 0.0078), and D-dimer (− 47%, P = 0.016) were observed (Fig. 1a–e). Due to circulatory shock, four patients received vasopressor treatment at the start of the PE that could be substantially reduced during treatment (− 71%, P = 0.031, Fig. 1h). Biochemical and clinical improvement continued over the following days together with an increase in the oxygenation index in 4 out of 5 patients (Fig. 1i). These improvements were achieved with only 1 to 2 PE, which might be a possible indication of a direct pathophysiological influence of PE on the COVID-19-associated cytokine storm-like clinical syndrome. Three of the 5 most critically ill patients are alive, while a 71-year-old male and a 76-year-old female patient died after the therapy was limited due to persistent severe ARDS.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics and treatment

Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5
Age (years) 53 71 62 76 67
Sex Male Male Male Female Female
Comorbidities No CAD, s/p CABG, schizophrenia, depression Atrial fibrillation, hypertension Diabetes, hypertension, s/p stroke Diabetes, hypertension, CKD stage V*, obesity stage II
Antibiotic therapy during the course of the disease Piperacillin/tazobactam#, azithromycin, meropenem, vancomycin, ceftazidime, metronidazole Piperacillin/tazobactam#, azithromycin, meropenem, vancomycin Piperacillin/tazobactam#, azithromycin, meropenem, vancomycin Piperacillin/tazobactam#, meropenem, flucloxacillin Piperacillin/tazobactam#
Antifungal therapy during the course of the disease Caspofungin# Caspofungin# Caspofungin# Caspofungin# Caspofungin#
Antiviral and immunomodulatory therapy during the course of the disease Hydroxychloroquine#, lopinavir/ritonavir, maraviroc#, aciclovir (for HSV) Hydroxychloroquine#, maraviroc#, aciclovir (for HSV) Maraviroc#, aciclovir (for HSV), ganciclovir (for CMV) Maraviroc# Maraviroc#, aciclovir (for HSV)
Other therapy during the course of the disease Tocilizumab, interferon, prednisolone Immunoglobulins, prednisolone, convalescent serum Convalescent serum
Time from symptom to PE (days) 12 9 16 17 11
Time from admission to PE (days) 6 4 8 10 5
Processed plasma volume (L)

3.60

3.66 (2)

3.38

3.02

2.93 (2)

3.17

3.51

3.40 (2)

Clinical outcome as of June 15, 2020 Extubated and spontaneous breathing, discharged from hospital Died Extubated and spontaneous breathing, discharged from hospital Died Extubated and spontaneous breathing, discharged from hospital

*Not yet on dialysis, #representing center practice for critically ill COVID-19 patients at the time of treatment

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Changes of biochemical (af) and clinical (gi) parameters during plasma exchange. af The first value after plasma exchange (PE) is compared to the last value before PE. gh Mean values for the 24 h after compared to the 24 h before PE are given. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used for statistical analysis

It has been suggested that a cytokine storm-like clinical syndrome may be responsible for a significant proportion of COVID-19-associated patient deaths [4]. PE improved inflammation, microcirculatory clot formation, and hypotension, thereby improving clinical outcomes. Further studies to test whether (repeated) PE can alter the course of critically ill COVID-19 patients are clearly indicated.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

CM, MAW, MZ, and UM designed the work, CS, and STH collected and analyzed the data, CM and UM interpreted the data, CM, MAW, MZ, and UM drafted the work or substantively revised it, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

There was no funding for the study.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Biochemical and clinical parameters were collected under the ethics vote S148/2020 of the Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University, and informed consent was retrieved from legal representatives of the patients.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was retrieved from legal representatives of the patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Christian Morath, Email: Christian.Morath@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Uta Merle, Email: Uta.Merle@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

References

  • 1.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang D, Yin Y, Hu C, et al. Clinical course and outcome of 107 patients infected with the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, discharged from two hospitals in Wuhan, China. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02895-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Keith P, Day M, Perkins L, Moyer L, Hewitt K, Wells A. A novel treatment approach to the novel coronavirus: an argument for the use of therapeutic plasma exchange for fulminant COVID-19. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2836-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moore JB, June CH. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science. 2020;368(6490):473–474. doi: 10.1126/science.abb8925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES