Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Aug 4;14(5):1495–1501. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.053

A proposed ABCD scoring system for patient’s self assessment and at emergency department with symptoms of COVID-19

Abhijeet Ashok Salunke 1,, Subodh Kumar Pathak 2, Anant Dhanwate 3, Vikas Warikoo 4, Kunal Nandy 5, Harshal Mendhe 6, Viswanth Kottakota 7, Rahul Madhukar Shinde 8, Shubham Ashok Patil 9, Tehsin Petiwala 10, Shashank Pandya 11
PMCID: PMC7399652  PMID: 32795741

1. Introduction

COVID -19 is a global pandemic and has the common symptoms in COVID-19 infection are fever, cough, myalgia and fatigue [1]. Pre-existing comorbidities are associated with severe disease and may have impact on the overall outcomes [2], [3]. Limited medical resources are a concern for all countries during this pandemic and the identification of high risk patients at early stage will be is helpful to avoid serious events and mortality in COVID-19. Currently there are limited tools available about grading of patients with corona infections at a medical centre [[4], [5], [6], [7]].

At present no scoring system has been described from medical professionals in Indian subcontinent. We propose a new tool for patient self-assessment, for emergency department of hospital with symptoms of COVID-19. The score is named as “ABCD Scoring system” and we have prepared a color coding based triage system based on the final score.

2. Material and methods

First described score is for patient’s self-assessment at home. The components included were age of patient, symptoms that includes breathlessness, cough, fever, fatigue and associated preexisting co-morbidities. The patient and his attendants can calculate their individual score and sum up the final score (Fig. 1, Fig. 2 ). The patients can subdivide themselves into three subgroups based on the score. According to the final score a color box that includes green, yellow and red color can be marked. Finally, they can mark their score color into a pyramid prepared at the end of scoring method.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

ABCD Scoring system for patient self-assessment with symptoms of COVID-19.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Triage system according to ABCD scoring system for patient self-assessment.

The second described score is for patient assessment at a COVID-19 emergency department or screening centre or during the admission process at a hospital. This score includes age of the patient, breathlessness, O2 saturation, chest x-ray, cough, fever, fatigue and associated preexisting co-morbidities. The paramedical staff and the attending doctor can calculate their individual score and sum up the final score (Fig. 3, Fig. 4 ). Finally, they can mark their score color into a pyramid prepared at the end of scoring method.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

ABCD Scoring system for health care professionals at emergency department in hospital admission for patients with symptoms of COVID-19.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Triage system according to ABCD scoring system for health care professionals at emergency department.

3. Results

The score for patient self assessment and screening centre were developed using the variables which outputs a value from 0,1,2. The final score was calculated by performing a sum of all the points. Three category we’re prepared that included mild (0–3), moderate (4–6) and severe (>6). According to the final score a color box that includes green, yellow and red color were marked. This was followed by marking the score color into a pyramid at the end of scoring method (Fig. 3). In patient self-assessment score for mild category suggestion was to observe and if symptoms persist then should consult the doctor, for moderate category suggestion was to consult a doctor and in sever category suggestion was to consult a corona treating centre. In emergency department score for mild category suggestion was to treat patient symptomatically, in moderate category suggestion was to provide semi critical care with oxygen supplementation and in severe category suggestion was for to provide critical care with artificial ventilation. (Fig. 3, Fig. 4).

4. Discussion

This study is, to best of our knowledge, is the first scoring tool that can utilized by patient himself, screening centers and hospital for predicting severity of disease with COVID-19 infection. In current score for patient at screening centre or during admission in hospital included a chest radiograph. The radiologic features in patients with COVID-19 are bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and ground glass opacity. Also in current scores dyspnea and oxygen saturation were included as an evaluation of pulmonary para meters. We reviewed the literature on various scoring systems for COVID-19 and compared them with current score [[4], [5], [6], [7]] (Table 1 ).

Table 1.

Review of Literature and comparison of various scoring tools for assessment in COVID-19.

Authors Title of Score Origin of score Severity risk score/Progression risk score Components of score
Duca et al5 Brescia-COVID respiratory severity scale Italy Severity risk Patient Wheezing
Respiratory rate
Pa O2 Sp O 2
Chest Xray
Dong et al6 CALL Score China Progression Risk Age
Comorbidity
Lymphocyte count
LDH
Lee Wallis et al7 Covid-19 Severity Score South Africa Severity Risk Comorbidities
Mobility
Assessment
Temperature
Pulse
Respiratory rate
Systolic BP
Shi et al4 Host Risk Score China Severity risk Age
Sex
Hypertension
Current Study ABCD score India Severity risk
Score1: Patients self assessment
Score 2:At Emergency department in hospitals
A: Age
B: Body ache
B: Body temperature
C: Contact with COVID patient
C: Cough
C: Comorbidities
C: Chest X-ray and CT scan
D:Dyspnea/Respiratory rate/O2 saturation

The current scoring tool is easy to remember due to alphabets A, B, C, D; and patients, health care professionals can easily use it. Secondly as it is an objective method and easily reproducible for assessment in COVID-19 infection. The color coding system into green, yellow and red color is similar to the traffic signal pattern and making it universal for use without language barrier. The scores are categorized into 3 subgroups groups and assigned 3 color as green(mild), yellow(moderate), red(severe). The three symbols used in pyramid are yellow color (resting person or observation/mild disease), green color (walking person or consult doctor/moderate disease) and red color (consult COVID centre/severe disease/ICU stay or Ventilator support). Higher score indicates increased severity and demands for intensive care. The advantages of this scoring system can help the health care workers to priorities the severe patients and early transfer to the intensive care. Also these tools may aid in planning different management modalities. The patients can be subdivided according to the scoring system into various categories which will help in utilizing the limited medical resources in an efficient manner. Similar triage systems have been described in literature in mass causality and war like situations [8].

4.1. Limitations of this study

The limitation of our study is that there is lack of validation of current scoring system. We propose a multi-centre study for the validation of current score and refinement according to its findings.

5. Conclusion

The ABCD scoring system is a tool can be useful as a medical triage system and subdivide patients according to the required treatment. The easy to use and remember system can be a helpful guide for health care professionals along with clinical findings for better management of patients with COVID-19 infection.

Funding

Nil.

Role of the funding source

There was no funding source for this study. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Declaration of competing interest

Nil.

References

  • 1.COVID-19 map - Johns Hopkins coronavirus resource center. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html n.d.
  • 2.Nandy K., Salunke A., Pathak S.K., Pandey A., Doctor C., Puj K. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of various comorbidities on serious events. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Jul 2;14(5):1017–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.064. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32634716; PMCID: PMC7331565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guan W.J., Ni Z.Y., Hu Y., Liang W.H., Ou C.Q., He J.X., China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19 Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shi Y., Yu X., Zhao H., Wang H., Zhao R., Sheng J. Host susceptibility to severe COVID-19 and establishment of a host risk score: findings of 487 cases outside Wuhan. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):2–5. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2833-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Duca A., Piva S., Focà E., Latronico N., Rizzi M. Calculated decisions: brescia-COVID respiratory severity scale (BCRSS)/Algorithm. Emerg Med Pract. 2020 Apr 16;22(5 Suppl):CD1–CD2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32297727 PMID: 32297727. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ji D., Zhang D., Xu J., Chen Z., Yang T., Zhao P. Prediction for Progression Risk in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: the CALL Score. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;9 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wallis L.A. African Federation for Emergency Medicine resources for managing COVID-19 in low resourced settings. Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(2):49. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bazyar J., Farrokhi M., Khankeh H. Triage systems in mass casualty incidents and disasters: a review study with a worldwide approach. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Feb 15;7(3):482–494. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES