Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Aug 3;10:13061. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70012-2

Bone marrow mammaglobin-1 (SCGB2A2) immunohistochemistry expression as a breast cancer specific marker for early detection of bone marrow micrometastases

Iman Mamdouh Talaat 1,2,3,✉,#, Mahmood Yaseen Hachim 4,#, Ibrahim Yaseen Hachim 1,2,✉,#, Ramez Abd El-Razak Ibrahim 5, Mohamed Abd El Rahman Ahmed 6, Hanan Yehia Tayel 3
PMCID: PMC7400628  PMID: 32747636

Abstract

Despite all the advances in the management of breast cancer (BC), patients with distance metastasis are still considered incurable with poor prognosis. For that reason, early detection of the metastatic lesions is crucial to improve patients’ life span as well as quality of life. Many markers were proposed to be used as biomarkers for metastatic BC lesions, however many of them lack organ specificity. This highlights the need for novel markers that are more specific in detecting disseminated BC lesions. Here, we investigated mammaglobin-1 expression as a potential and specific marker for metastatic BC lesions using our patient cohort consisting of 30 newly diagnosed BC patients. For all patients, bone marrow (BM) aspiration, BM biopsy stained by H&E and BM immunohistochemically stained for mammaglobin-1 were performed. In addition, the CA15-3 in both serum and bone marrow plasma was also evaluated for each patient. Indeed, mammaglobin-1 immuno-staining was able to detect BM micrometastases in 16/30 patients (53.3%) compared to only 5/30 patients (16.7%) in BM biopsy stained by H&E and no cases detected by BM aspirate (0%). In addition, our results showed a trend of association between mammaglobin-1 immunoreactivity and the serum and BM plasma CA15-3. Further validation was done using large publicly available databases. Our results showed that mammaglobin-1 gene expression to be specifically upregulated in BC patients’ samples compared to normal tissue as well as samples from other cancers. Moreover, our findings also showed mammaglobin-1 expression to be a marker of tumour progression presented as lymph nodes involvement and distant metastasis. These results provide an initial evidence for the use of mammaglobin-1 (SCGB2A2) immunostaining in bone marrow as a tool to investigate early BM micrometastases in breast cancer.

Subject terms: Cancer, Breast cancer

Introduction

Despite the progress in breast cancer (BC) management, 20–30% of early-stage BC patients will end up with recurrence and distance metastasis1. Those patients usually experience worse prognosis and shortened median survival2. Moreover, 90% of the mortalities related to BC were found to occur in patients who presented with metastatic disease3,4.

For that reason, early detection of disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) and metastatic lesions, in addition to their effective management might be essential to reduce mortality and improve the patients’ outcome5. The discovery of novel markers for early detection of metastasis as well as the early intervention and monitoring for BC patients might represent a key factor in the management of such patients.

Many markers were proposed for the early detection of metastatic BC, however many of them showed low sensitivity and specificity, which limit their clinical utility6. This lack of sensitivity and specificity highlights the need for new and novel markers that can early detect metastasis and are BC specific.

Bone marrow (BM) is considered as one of the main sites for BC metastasis, for that reason, efforts were made to early detect malignant infiltrates in BM7. Cytokeratins including (CK19 & CK20) are considered as one of the most widely accepted protein markers for the detection of epithelial tumour cells in bone marrow8,9. Moreover, the serum levels of CA15-3 (MUC-1), which is a mucinous glycoprotein, is another commonly used tumor marker for preclinical detection of tumour recurrence and metastasis, in addition to patients’ follow up10. One of the limitations of the use of CA15-3 as a specific marker for BC metastasis is the fact that it is overexpressed in a group of other epithelial cancers including ovary, colon and lung11.

Previous reports also identified mammaglobin-1 (SCGB2A2), which is a glycoprotein that belongs to a larger family called uteroglobin12, as a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker for BC.

Indeed, 70–80% of the primary and metastatic BC biopsies were found to show evidence of mammaglobin-1 mRNA expression. Additionally, 80% of BC samples showed mammaglobin-1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC)13. While the diagnostic role of mammaglobin-1 expression in BC is well established, the utility of this marker as an early and tissue-specific marker of BC metastasis is yet to be illustrated14.

In this study, we used our patient cohort of 30 newly diagnosed BC patients with apparently non-metastatic primary lesion categorized as stage I, II and III who received no chemotherapy. All patients were investigated for bone marrow aspiration (BMA) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) stained by H&E as well as BM immunohistochemical staining for mammaglobin-1. Besides, the serum and BM plasma CA15-3 were also evaluated for each patient and the correlation between the two markers was investigated. Due to the limited number of our patient cohort, different publicly available databases containing thousands of BC samples was also used to investigate the specificity of mammaglobin-1 as a marker of tumour progression and metastatic lesions in BC.

Materials and methods

Patients

Our cohort consisted of 30 BC patients with early stages (0-III). Those patients were selected from Alexandria Armed Forces Hospital during the period from March 2014 to December 2015. The clinicopathological data and medical records of all patients were retrieved and reviewed.

Bone marrow biopsy

The BMB was obtained from the posterior superior iliac spine [PSIS] using the manual trephine needles. The obtained biopsy cores were fixed in 10% formol-saline for at least 24 h. The specimens then decalcified in formic acid-sodium citrate for 48 h.

Four µm thick sections were cut and then dehydrated in alcohol, cleared in xylene, embedded in paraffin wax, and stained with H&E stain.

Bone marrow aspiration

The BMA was obtained from the same puncture just after obtaining the core through the same skin incision with the same needle but after being angled in a different direction. The aspirate was spread immediately on multiple glass slides and left to dry before being stained by Leishman stain.

Immunohistochemical staining of BMB sections

Immunohistochemistry staining was performed on the BMB. In brief, the slides initially were incubated in peroxidase blocking solution for 10 min. The slides then incubated for 60 min with mammaglobin-1 monoclonal antibody available from DAKO for Anti-Mammaglobin, code no. M3625 diluted with DAKO Antibody Diluent code no. S 0809, pH 7.2–7.6, according to the recommended dilution (1:15–30). This is followed by applying labeled polymer to cover the section and incubate for 30 min. Then the whole section was covered by applying fresh prepared (DAB and chromogen) solution to be incubated afterwards for 5–10 min in the dark. The slides were counter-stained with hematoxylin stain and incubated for 15–20 min. Next, the slides were dehydrated by subsequent dipping into ascending grades of ethyl alcohol then cleared by two quick dips in xylene. Finally, the slides were mounted with DPX.

Morphological interpretation

Bone marrow aspiration interpretation

Criteria of morphologically positive BM aspirate includes the presence of any large pleomorphic cells with hyperchromatic coarsely reticular nuclear chromatin, prominent or sharply defined nucleoli and moderately abundant variably basophilic cytoplasm ± vacuolation. These neoplastic cells occur either as tight small clumps or clusters ± individually dispersed cells. In addition, they are arranged either in "syncytial" formation or in Indian file pattern.

Bone marrow biopsy interpretation

In biopsy sections, the criteria of positive BM include:

  1. The presence of neoplastic cells of same nuclear features as mentioned above, in randomly scattered small aggregates of 2–4 cells (forming micro-colonies) or in small but obvious sheet(s).

  2. Frequently associated marrow stromal reaction in the form of one or more of the following:

  3. Variable degrees of fibrous stromal response with formation of reticulin and/or collagen fibrosis among the involved areas with or without the formation of "desmoplasia".

  4. Obvious interstitial increase in marrow eosinophils, histiocytes, plasma cells and/or fibroblasts.

  5. Active "angiogenesis" or increased mean vascular density.

  6. Increased osteoblastic/osteoclastic activities with the occurrence of trabecular bone erosion and/or appositional bone formation that lead to widening of BM trabeculae spaces.

Criteria of morphologically suspicious BM

In aspirate smears:

  1. Absence of frank non-haemopoietic-looking neoplastic cells but rare or occasional presence of their single or clustered "bare" nuclei.

  2. Associated increase in marrow osteoblasts and osteoclasts.

In biopsy sections:

  1. Absence of obvious non-haemopoietic sheets or frank micro-metastatic colonies.

  2. Presence of sticking one or more of the above-mentioned marrow stromal reactions either associated with morphologically uncertain micro-metastatic deposits or not.

  3. The morphologic expectation of hidden metastatic cells that might be entangled among a prominent fibrotic reaction.

Criteria of morphologically negative BM

  1. Morphological absence of any frank or suspicious individual cells, micro-metastatic colonies or sheets in all examined both marrow smears and sections.

  2. Absence of any suspicious marrow stromal reactions in marrow sections.

Interpretation of immunohistochemistry staining

The cases were considered positive, if the cells showed diffuse brown coloration on cell membranes and/or in cytoplasm of cells.

CA15-3 serum and marrow plasma levels assessment

CA15‐3 serum and marrow plasma levels assessment were performed using the commercially available quantitative fully automated Abbott "Axsym" system (Abbot Laboratories, Abbot Park, IL).

From each patient, 150 µL of the sample were pipetted to one well of the reaction vessel where it was mixed with 115D8 MoAb‐coated microparticles forming an antigen–antibody complex. The reaction mixture was incubated, so the antigenic reactive determinants in the sample to bind to the antibody-coated micro-particles. An aliquot of the reaction mixture was transferred to the matrix cell where the micro-particles bound irreversibly to the glass fiber matrix. The matrix cell was washed to remove unbound materials. For the DF3 antibody, Alkaline Phosphatase conjugate was dispensed onto the matrix cell and bound to the Ag-Ab complex. The matrix cell was then washed to remove unbound materials. This is followed by adding the substrate to the matrix cell and the rate of fluorescent product formation was measured by the MEIA optical assembly.

Data mining

Different large, publicly available databases were used to investigate the association between mammaglobin-1 expression levels and different clinicopathological data. This included ONCOMINE database, which contains data from 700 different datasets constituting samples from diverse cancers. In addition, we used GOBO database that includes 1881 BC patients’ samples to investigate the association between gene expression levels and the clinicopathological parameters. Moreover, the BC Gene-Expression Miner v4.0 database was also used to investigate the correlation between mammaglobin-1 (SCGB2A2) and CA15-3 (MUC-1) gene expression levels.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistics software version 23. For our patient cohort, chi-square test was used to investigate the association between BMA, H&E stained BMB, mammaglobin-1 IHC and different clinicopathological parameters. The p value (< 0.05) was considered significant for all applied statistical tests. For the ONCOMINE database, the p-values was automatically calculated by the program using t-test. The figures were presented as box plots with median represented as the band inside the box, while the top and bottom of the boxes represent the 25th percentile and 75th percentile.

In breast cancer miner database as well as GOBO database, the association between gene expression levels and different clinicopathological parameters was done using Welch's test, in addition to Dunnett–Tukey–Kramer's tests.

Ethics statement

The research was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt (approval number: 052808025). Biopsies from the patients were collected after informed consent according to the Helsinki declaration. All experiments and methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Results

Bone marrow mammaglobin-1 immunoreactivity is more sensitive in detection of BM micrometastases than BMA and BMB H&E

To study the possible use of mammaglobin-1 as a marker for early prediction of BM metastasis in BC patients, we investigated the ability of mammaglobin-1 IHC in the detection of BM micrometastases compared to other classical markers and techniques using our patient cohort of 30 BC patients.

The presence or absence of BM micrometastases of all patients was determined by BMA and H&E stained BM trephine biopsy. The results were then compared to mammaglobin-1 BM IHC staining (Table 1).

Table 1.

The distribution of BMA, H&E stained BMB and mammaglobin-1 IHC staining in our patient cohort.

Technique No. of cases % p
BMA 0.0013*
Positive 0 0.0
Negative 30 100.0
H&E stained BMB
Suspicious 5 16.7
Negative 25 83.3
Mammaglobin-1 IHC staining
Positive 16 53.3
Negative 14 46.7
Open in a new tab

Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) was not able to detect any evidence of BM micrometastases in all 30 patients (0%). Moreover, H&E stained BMB showed suspected BM micrometastases in 5 patients (16.7%) presenting as hypercellularity, fibrosis, inflammatory infiltration (plasma cells, macrophage, and eosinophils), angiogenesis and osteoclastic hyperplasia (Figs. 1A–C). Mammaglobin-1 immunoreactivity, which is highly suggestive of BM micrometastases, was observed in 16 patients (53.3%) (P = 0.0013) (Fig. 1D).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Representative pictures of the H&E and mammaglobin-1 IHC staining. (A) Positive case of metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), the neoplastic epithelial cells forming nests in the fibrous stroma of the bone marrow (H&E, × 100). (B) Suspicious case of metastatic IDC shows hypercellularity and numerous inflammatory cells (plasma cells, histocytes and eosinophils) (H&E, × 400). (C) Suspicious case of metastatic breast carcinoma showing inflammatory infiltrates (plasma cells and eosinophils) (H&E, × 400). (D) The same case shown in C revealing brown cytoplasmic staining of mammaglobin-1 (positive stain) (Immunoperoxidase, × 400).

Interestingly, 4/5 of the BMB suspicious cases (80%) showed positive IHC staining for mammaglobin-1 (Table 2). These results highlight mammaglobin-1 IHC staining as a possible sensitive and specific marker to detect BM micrometastases in BC samples compared to other classical methods.

Table 2.

The association between mammaglobin-1 bone marrow immunoreactivity and different clinicopathological parameters.

Mammaglobin-1 bone marrow immunoreactivity p
Positive Negative % of Positive
BMB H&E
Negative 13 12 52 P = 0.24
Positive 4 1 80
Histological type
Invasive ductal carcinoma 11 11 50 P = 0.54
Invasive lobular carcinoma 5 3 62.5
Stage
Stages 0,1 3 5 37.5 P = 0.29
Stages 2,3 13 9 59.09
LN status
LN negative 3 7 30 P = 0.09
LN positive 13 7 65
Grade*
Grade I 0 3 0 P = 0.019
Grade II 4 6 40
Grade III 7 2 77
Open in a new tab

*8 cases were lobular carcinoma, so they were not included in the grading system.

Bone marrow mammaglobin-1 immunoreactivity is associated with more advanced disease and more aggressive phenotype

Next, we evaluated mammaglobin-1 positive cases and their association with classical clinicopathological parameters (Table 2). Despite the lack of statistical significance, our results showed that mammaglobin-1 positivity in the BM was doubled in more advanced stages (59.09%) (II & III) compared to the early stages (0 & I) (37.5%). Similarly, mammaglobin-1 immunoreactivity was more detected in LN positive samples (65%) compared to LN negative tumors (30%) (P = 0.09). Similarly, mammaglobin-1 expression was significantly higher in samples obtained from poorly differentiated tumors (77%) compared to no expression (0%) in samples obtained from well differentiated tumors (0%) (P = 0.019). This highlights that mammaglobin-1 positive BM expression to be associated with more advanced disease and more aggressive phenotype.

Bone marrow mammaglobin-1 immunoreactivity and its association with serum and BM plasma CA15-3

CA15-3, is a mucinous glycoprotein and a product of mucin-1 (MUC-1) gene usually found in most of the epithelial cells15. The expression of CA15-3 was found to be overexpressed in many tumors including breast, ovarian, colon, lung, and other cancers16,17. Many reports showed that elevated serum CA15-3 is usually associated with more advanced disease and lymph node involvement18,19. Moreover, serial measurement of CA15-3 is commonly used for follow up and early detection of tumor recurrence and metastatic disease in BC patients20,21.

For that reason, we next evaluated the association between both serum and BM plasma CA15-3 levels and mammaglobin-1 BM immunoreactivity. The mean serum CA15-3 in our patient cohort was 19.79 ± 13.65 (ranged 3.7–61). The mean BM plasma CA15-3 level was 19.87 ± 13.78 (range 3.9–61.5). There was no statistically significant difference between serum and BM plasma CA15-3 levels (P > 0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics for serum and BM plasma CA15-3.

Serum CA15-3 BM plasma CA15-3
Range 3.7–61 3.9–61.5
Mean 19.79 19.87
S.D 13.65 13.78
T 0.98
p 0.452
Open in a new tab

Interestingly, our results showed that patients with positive BM mammaglobin-1 immunoreactivity had higher levels of serum CA15-3 (21.975 ± 17.852) compared to 17.292 ± 5.955 in the mammaglobin-1 IHC negative group. Similarly, BM plasma CA15-3 was also higher in the positive BM mammaglobin-1 IHC cases (21.925 ± 18.109) compared with mammaglobin-1 IHC negative cases (17.51 ± 5.8228) (Table 4). Those results further highlight the role of BM mammaglobin-1 IHC detection as a possible marker for the early detection of bone marrow micrometastases.

Table 4.

Relation between serum and BM plasma CA15-3 and mammaglobin-1 IHC.

N Mean S.D Min Max t-test p
Serum CA15-3
Mammaglobin-1 IHC negative 14 17.2929 5.95502 7.60 27.80 0.874 0.358
Mammaglobin-1 IHC positive 16 21.9750 17.85208 3.70 61.00
BM plasma CA15-3
Mammaglobin-1 IHC negative 14 17.5143 5.82288 7.80 27.80 0.759 0.391
Mammaglobin-1 IHC positive 16 21.9250 18.10972 3.90 61.50
Open in a new tab

Mammaglobin-1 protein and RNA levels are highly expressed in breast tissue samples compared to other tissues

Our previous results showed mammaglobin-1 as a possible marker for early detection of bone marrow micrometastases in BC patients, for that reason, next we tried to further investigate its organ specificity in normal as well as malignant lesions from different tissues extracted from the human protein atlas , which is publicly available database.

In healthy tissues, mammaglobin-1 mRNA levels showed highest expression in breast tissue, followed by skin, uterine cervix and salivary glands (Fig. 2A). Similarly, between malignant tissues, mammaglobin-1 expression was significantly higher in BC samples compared to all other cancer types (P = 3.16E−97) (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Mammaglobin-1 (SCGB2A2) expression in different normal as well as malignant tissues. (A) SCGB2A2 gene expression levels in different healthy body tissue using human protein atlas database. (B) SCGB2A2 gene expression levels in 1,500 cancer cases from different organs using Bittner multicancer dataset from the ONCOMINE database. (C) MUC1 gene expression levels in 1,500 cancer cases from different organs using Bittner multicancer dataset from the ONCOMINE database. (D) SCGB2A2 gene expression and its association with breast cancer subtypes according to Hu and PAM50 classification using 1881 breast cancer cases of GOBO database.

Mammaglobin-1 gene expression levels showed higher tissue specificity in detecting BC tumors compared to CA 15-3

Next, and using the same in silico approach, we investigated the specificity of mammaglobin-1 compared to CA15-3, which is widely used marker for BC patients’ follow-up. Interestingly, our results showed that CA15-3 levels to be elevated in group of epithelial cancers with no specificity for BC. In comparison, mammaglobin-1 was specifically upregulated in BC samples compared to other tumors (Fig. 2B,C). This clearly demonstrates that mammaglobin-1 is a suitable candidate as a specific biomarker for breast lesions and is more specific than CA15-3.

Mammaglobin-1 gene expression is associated with luminal A BC subtype and least expressed in the basal-like BC subtype

For further evaluation of the role of mammaglobin-1 in BC, we investigated its expression in different breast cancer subtypes using another database that includes 1800 BC samples. Indeed, we found mammaglobin-1 gene expression to be significantly correlated with luminal A breast cancer subtype and to be least expressed in the basal-like BC subtype (Fig. 2D).

Mammaglobin-1 gene expression is upregulated in the more advanced BC disease

Then, we evaluated the expression levels of mammaglobin-1 gene and its association with tumor progression. Our results showed that mammaglobin-1 expression to be steadily upregulated in the more advanced stages (stages III and IV) compared to the early stages (stages 0, I and II). Similarly, CA 15-3 also showed the same trend of overexpression in the more advanced stages (III & IV) compared to the early stages (I & II) (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Mammaglobin-1 (SCGB2A2) gene expression in association with tumor progression. (A) Mammaglobin-1 and MUC1 gene expression and their association with tumor stage using Curtis dataset of ONCOMINE database. (B) Mammaglobin-1 gene expression and MUC1 its association with LN involvement using Lu dataset of ONCOMINE database. (C) Mammaglobin-1 gene expression and MUC1 its association with presence or absence of distant metastasis using Brittner dataset of ONCOMINE database.

Next, we investigated the association between mammaglobin-1 and LN involvement as well as distant metastasis, which are considered an important indicator of tumor progression. Our results clearly demonstrated an upregulation of the mammaglobin-1 gene expression in BC patients with LN positivity compared to LN negative tumors (Fig. 3B). Similarly, our results also showed that mammaglobin-1 gene expression to be overexpressed in patients with tumor metastasis compared to patients with no evidence of metastasis (Fig. 3C).

Interestingly, mammaglobin-1 showed higher power in differentiating LN status compared to CA15-3 (Fig. 3B). Similarly, mammaglobin-1 was also more able to differentiate metastatic samples from non-metastatic samples when compared to CA15-3 (Fig. 3C).

Mammaglobin-1 gene expression levels is associated with higher incidence of bone metastasis compared to other metastatic sites

Next, we investigated the association between mammaglobin-1 expression levels and different metastatic sites. Our results showed mammaglobin-1 to be higher in cases with bone metastasis compared to lung and other metastatic sites (Fig. 4A). These results further indicate the strong association between mammaglobin-1 expression and bone involvement in BC.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Mammaglobin-1 (SCGB2A2) gene expression in disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) compared to metastatic tumour cells (MTCs). (A) SCGB2A2 gene expression according to different metastatic sites in breast cancer using Minn dataset of ONCOMINE database. (B)The gene expression levels of SCGB2A2 in patients’ derived xenograft (PDX) of mice with BM metastasis compared to primary tumors using (GSE57947) dataset. (C)The gene expression levels of SCGB2A2 in DTCs compared to MTCs obtained from (GSE14776). (D)The Pearson’s correlation plot between SCGB2A2 and MUC1 gene expression levels in BC samples using BC Gene-Expression Miner v4.0 database. (E) The expression levels of SCGB2A2 in BC samples stratified according to MUC1 gene expression levels using BC Gene-Expression Miner v4.0 database.

Mammaglobin-1 expression can detect early disseminated tumor cells in BM

Then, we tried to investigate the role of mammaglobin-1 as an early marker for bone marrow metastasis. To achieve this, we extracted data profile from (GSE57947) dataset that represents a Patient Derived Xenograft (PDX) model established to identify genes that are associated with BM micro metastatic disease in breast cancer. Using our own in-house filtration method, we compared the gene expression levels of mammaglobin-1 in mice with primary tumors only compared to mice with BM metastasis as well as with splenic metastasis.

Even though the difference was not significant due to the limited number of mice, our results clearly showed higher levels of mammaglobin-1 in mice with BM metastasis compared to the primary tumor. Similarly, mammaglobin-1 levels were also high in mice with BM metastasis compared with mice with splenic metastasis (Fig. 4B).

Mammaglobin-1 is progressively increased from early disseminated tumor cells to overt bone metastasis

Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the BM of BC patients are commonly identified in early stage of the disease, however, their potential to initiate metastases is not known. Indeed, genes that are essential to develop bone metastasis might represent the ideal marker for micro-metastasis prediction. For that reason and using the same bioinformatic approach, we investigated the expression levels of mammaglobin-1 in DTCs from BM aspirates and then we compared them to matching overt bone metastasis obtained from CT guided biopsies of bone metastases of BC patients.

Our results showed that mammaglobin-1 expression was significantly upregulated in the overt metastatic tumour cells (MTCs) compared to only DTCs (P = 0.03) (Fig. 4C). These results indicate that mammaglobin-1 might be essential for DTCs to progress into overt MTCs and play role in facilitating their progression.

Mammaglobin-1 gene expression is highly associated with CA15-3 gene expression in large BC patient cohort

Due to the limited number of our patient cohort and to have better idea about the association between mammaglobin-1 expression and CA15-3 levels, we investigated the association between mammaglobin-1 gene expression and CA15-3 gene expression levels in 9,000 BC samples obtained from publicly available databases.

Indeed, our results showed a strong positive correlation between CA15-3 expression and mammaglobin-1 expression (r = 0.34, P < 0.0001). Moreover, splitting BC samples according to CA15-3 expression showed that BC samples that had CA15-3 expression more than the median have a significant upregulation in the mammaglobin-1 gene expression. This further confirms the strong association between mammaglobin-1 expression and CA15-3 in BC patients’ samples (Figs. 4D,E) and highlights the possible use of mammaglobin-1 as an alternative marker for CA15-3 in the prediction of BM micrometastases in BC patients.

Discussion

The prognosis of BC patients was found to be dramatically influenced by presence or absence of metastatic lesions. While the 5-year survival of patients with localized disease reaching up to 99%22, this rate dramatically decline to only 25% in patient presented with metastatic lesions22,23. This includes the presence of occult micrometastases to BM that was found to be present in around 30% of patients with early stage breast cancer and found to be related with worse patient’s outcome24.

For that reason, great efforts has been made during the last decades for the discovery of metastasis-related biomarkers that can be used for the prediction and early detection of disseminated tumor cells and metastatic lesions in BC25–27.

Known the fact that an ideal marker should specifically and universally be expressed on all BC cells. In addition, it should also be easy to detect and has clinical relevance, number of single and multi-marker assays were evaluated28.

Unfortunately, the lack of solely tissue specific marker for metastatic BC lesions is still considered as one of the major challenges in that field29. For examples, CA15-3, which is widely used as biomarker for BC patients’ follow-up and progression, was found to have low BC specificity28. Another major challenge, is the lack of international consensus and protocols for the various immunocytochemical and molecular markers used to detect occult micrometastases in the BM of BC patients29.

For that reason, here we investigated the possible use of BM mammaglobin-1 expression as a possible and single marker of early detection of BM micrometastases in BC patients.

Our results using our patient cohort revealed that BM IHC staining for mammaglobin-1 was more sensitive in the detection of early BM micrometastases compared to other conventional techniques including BMA and BMB stained by H&E. Indeed, this goes with the fact that using conventional H&E stain for detection of early metastatic lesions might not be able to detect very small amounts of disseminated occult tumor cells in different metastatic sites including lymph nodes28.

Additionally, our results showed a trend of association between mammaglobin-1immunoreactivity and the serum and BM plasma CA15-3, which is the most widely used serum marker for initial work-up for BC diagnosis, besides to its use as early marker for recurrence and/or metastatic breast disease20,21,30.

Due to the limited number of our patient cohort, different publicly available databases that contain thousands of BC samples were also used to investigate the specificity of mammaglobin-1 as a marker of tumour progression and metastatic lesions in BC.

Our results clearly demonstrated that mammaglobin-1 gene expression is specifically upregulated in BC patients compared to CA15-3, which showed upregulation in a group of other epithelial cancers including esophageal, gastric, lung and ovary. The specificity of mammaglobin-1 to BC was previously highlighted in a group of reports. Indeed, mammaglobin-1 expression was found to be strictly confined to normal mammary tissue as well as BC tissues31,32.

Moreover, our findings that mammaglobin-1 expression to be upregulated in the more advanced BC stages; with LN positive and/or with metastatic lesions also go with previous reports that showed human mammaglobin expression to be more evident in the advanced stages of BC compared to earlier stages33.

The sensitivity of mammaglobin-1 BM immunoreactivity to detect bone marrow micrometastases compared to BMA and BMB also goes with previous reports that showed mammaglobin expression as a sensitive marker for micrometastases in other tissues like sentinel lymph nodes34–40.

The superiority of mammaglobin-1 in differentiating LN positive from LN negative tumors as well as metastatic from non-metastatic lesions compared to CA15-3 clearly highlights the possible use of BM mammaglobin-1 immunoreactivity as well as gene expression levels as an ideal marker for early detection of BM micrometastases in BC.

One of the main limitations of our study is the small samples size of our cohort, in addition to the lack of the patients’ follow-up data in that cohort. This limitation is not restricted to our cohort, but also appear in many reports that investigated the clinical utility of different prognostic and predictive markers in BC. However, and to overcome this limitation, we tried to use additional bioinformatic approach to further validate our data. The main advantage of this approach is the ability to investigate gene expression levels as well as protein levels of mammaglobin-1 (SCGB2A2) in large patients’ cohort reaching to thousands of patients and compare it with a wide range of clinicopathological parameters including patient’s outcome.

In conclusion, our results provide an initial evidence for the use of mammaglobin-1 (SCGB2A2) IHC expression in BM as a tool to investigate early BM micrometastases in BC. Despite the limited number of cases, our data clearly showed mammaglobin-1 IHC expression as a sensitive and specific tool to detect occult BM micrometastases in a relatively early-stage disease. Indeed, those results need to be validated in larger patient cohort to address their clinical utility.

Abbreviations

BC

Breast cancer

BM

Bone marrow

BMA

Bone marrow aspiration

BMB

Bone marrow biopsy

DTCs

Disseminated tumor cells

IHC

Immunohistochemistry

Author contributions

I.T.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing—original draft. M.Y.H.: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft. I.Y.H.: Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing—original draft. R.A.I: Methodology, Validation, Writing—original draft. M.A.A.: Investigation, Methodology, Validation. H.Y.T.: Methodology, Validation, Writing—original draft.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Iman Mamdouh Talaat, Mahmood Yaseen Hachim and Ibrahim Yaseen Hachim.

Contributor Information

Iman Mamdouh Talaat, Email: italaat@sharjah.ac.ae.

Ibrahim Yaseen Hachim, Email: ibrahim.hachim@sharjah.ac.ae.

References

  • 1.Wang R, et al. The Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with different metastatic sites in stage IV breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:1091. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6311-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cardoso F, et al. 1st International consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 1) Breast. 2012;21:242–252. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.an overview of the randomised trials Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival. Lancet. 2005;365:1687–1717. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science. 2011;331:1559–1564. doi: 10.1126/science.1203543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Di Gioia D, et al. Early detection of metastatic disease in asymptomatic breast cancer patients with whole-body imaging and defined tumour marker increase. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;112:809–818. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kabel AM. Tumor markers of breast cancer: New prospectives. J. Oncol. Sci. 2017;3:5–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kamby C, et al. The presence of tumor cells in bone marrow at the time of first recurrence of breast cancer. Cancer. 1987;60:1306–1312. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870915)60:6&#x0003c;1306::aid-cncr2820600624&#x0003e;3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zehentner BK. Detection of disseminatedtumor cells: strategies and diagnostic implications. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2002;2:41–48. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2.1.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.9Bidard, F.-C. et al. (AACR, 2007).
  • 10.Geng B, Liang M-M, Ye X-B, Zhao W-Y. Association of CA 15–3 and CEA with clinicopathological parameters in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2015;3:232–236. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fu Y, Li H. Assessing clinical significance of serum CA15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2016;22:3154. doi: 10.12659/MSM.896563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Watson MA, Fleming TP. Mammaglobin, a mammary-specific member of the uteroglobin gene family, is overexpressed in human breast cancer. Can. Res. 1996;56:860–865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Han J-H, et al. Mammaglobin expression in lymph nodes is an important marker of metastatic breast carcinoma. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2003;127:1330–1334. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-1330-MEILNI. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Z, et al. Mammaglobin, a valuable diagnostic marker for metastatic breast carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2009;2:384. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thompson JA, Grunert F, Zimmermann W. Carcinoembryonic antigen gene family: molecular biology and clinical perspectives. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 1991;5:344–366. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1860050510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gendler SJ. MUC1, the renaissance molecule. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplas. 2001;6:339–353. doi: 10.1023/A:1011379725811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roy LD, et al. MUC1 enhances invasiveness of pancreatic cancer cells by inducing epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Oncogene. 2011;30:1449. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Park B-W, et al. Preoperative CA 15–3 and CEA serum levels as predictor for breast cancer outcomes. Ann. Oncol. 2007;19:675–681. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee J, et al. Elevated levels of preoperative CA 15–3 and CEA serum levels have independently poor prognostic significance in breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2012;24:1225–1231. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nicolini A, et al. Intensive post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients with tumour markers: CEA, TPA or CA15. 3 vs MCA and MCA-CA15. 3 vs CEA-TPA-CA15. 3 panel in the early detection of distant metastases. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:269. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pedersen AC, Sørensen PD, Jacobsen EH, Madsen JS, Brandslund I. Sensitivity of CA 15–3, CEA and serum HER2 in the early detection of recurrence of breast cancer. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2013;51:1511–1519. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Society, A. C. (American Cancer Society Atlanta, GA, 2017).
  • 23.Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Braun S, et al. A pooled analysis of bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:793–802. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.van de Vijver MJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1999–2009. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Appierto V, et al. How to study and overcome tumor heterogeneity with circulating biomarkers: the breast cancer case. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2017;44:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ramaswamy S, Ross KN, Lander ES, Golub TR. A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors. Nat. Genet. 2003;33:49–54. doi: 10.1038/ng1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lacroix M. Significance, detection and markers of disseminated breast cancer cells. Endocr. Relat. Cancer. 2006;13:1033–1067. doi: 10.1677/ERC-06-0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vincent-Salomon A, Bidard F-C, Pierga J-Y. Bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer: review of detection methods, prognostic impact and biological issues. J. Clin. Pathol. 2008;61:570–576. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.046649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Al-azawi D, et al. CA 15–3 is predictive of response and disease recurrence following treatment in locally advanced breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:220. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gargano G, et al. Detection and quantification of mammaglobin in the blood of breast cancer patients: can it be useful as a potential clinical marker? Preliminary results of a GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale) prospective study. Ann. Oncol. 2006;17:41–45. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Al Joudi FS. Human mammaglobin in breast cancer: a brief review of its clinical utility. Indian J. Med. Res. 2014;139:675. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mercatali L, et al. RT-PCR determination of maspin and mammaglobin B in peripheral blood of healthy donors and breast cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 2005;17:424–428. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Leygue E, et al. Mammaglobin, a potential marker of breast cancer nodal metastasis. J. Pathol. 1999;189:28–33. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1&#x0003c;28::AID-PATH389&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Roncella S, et al. Human mammaglobin mRNA is a reliable molecular marker for detecting occult breast cancer cells in peripheral blood. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. CR. 2005;24:265–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ferro P, et al. Detection of circulating tumour cells in breast cancer patients using human mammaglobin RT-PCR: association with clinical prognostic factors. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:2377–2382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dell’Orto P, et al. Assessing the status of axillary sentinel lymph nodes of breast carcinoma patients by a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay for mammaglobin 1 mRNA. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2006;98:185–190. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9148-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kataoka A, et al. RT-PCR detection of breast cancer cells in sentinel lymph modes. Int. J. Oncol. 2000;16:1147–1199. doi: 10.3892/ijo.16.6.1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Marchetti A, et al. mRNA markers of breast cancer nodal metastases: comparison between mammaglobin and carcinoembryonic antigen in 248 patients. J. Pathol. 2001;195:186–190. doi: 10.1002/path.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ouellette RJ, Richard D, Maïcas E. RT-PCR for mammaglobin genes, MGB1 and MGB2, identifies breast cancer micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2004;121:637–643. doi: 10.1309/MMACTXT55L8QTKC1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES