Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;12(7):2038. doi: 10.3390/nu12072038

Table 5.

Multivariate regression models of breakfast nutrient intake and breakfast food servings with regular consumers as the referent group (n = 557).

Intermittent
Variable β (95% CI) p
Breakfast Dietary Intake Parameters
 Breakfast total energy (kcal) −207.11 (−208.88, −159.76) <0.001 *
 Breakfast protein (%kcal) a,b −0.34 (−1.13, 0.44) 0.13
 Breakfast fat (%kcal) a,b 0.51 (−1.80, 2.82) 0.59
 Breakfast carbohydrate (%kcal) a,b −0.37 (−3.24, 2.51) 0.43
 Breakfast total fiber (g) a −1.75 (−2.07, −1.43) <0.001 *
 Breakfast total sugar (%kcal) a −0.61 (−3.12, 1.89) 0.63
 Breakfast soluble fiber (g) b −0.62 (−0.74, −0.51) <0.001 *
 Breakfast insoluble fiber (g) b −1.11 (−1.34, −0.87) <0.001 *
 Breakfast added sugar (%kcal) b 1.38 (−0.52, 3.29) 0.81
Breakfast Food Servings
 Breakfast whole grains (serving/day) c −0.22 (−0.31, −0.13) <0.001 *
 Breakfast refined grains (serving/day) c −0.03 (−0.12, 0.07) 0.14

* Indicates a statistically significant value of p < 0.05. Multivariate regression assessed relationships between all dietary parameters by breakfast consumption groups (n = 557). Regular consumers served as the referent group for all analyses. Overall effects not reported due to contrast of only two levels of breakfast consumption groups. Breakfast energy was assessed in a univariate model, adjusting for subsequent energy. a Model included breakfast percent protein, percent fat, percent carbohydrate, total fiber, and percent total sugar. b Model included breakfast percent protein, percent fat, percent carbohydrate, soluble fiber, insoluble fiber, and percent added sugar. c Model included breakfast whole and refined grain servings. A priori covariates included: age, sex, race/ethnicity, free/reduced lunch status, BMI z-score, day of the week, and total energy.