Skip to main content
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
. 2020 Jul 31;8(7 suppl6):2325967120S00351. doi: 10.1177/2325967120S00351

Defining the MCID, PASS and SCB for Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery at Minimum Five-Year Follow-up

Benedict Nwachukwu 1, Edward Beck 1, Kyle Kunze 1, Jorge Chahla 1, Justin Drager 1, Shane Nho 1, Jonathan Rasio 1
PMCID: PMC7401159

Abstract

Objectives:

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) have gained prominence as important variables in the orthopedic outcomes literature. In hip preservation surgery, much attention has been given to defining early clinically significant outcome, however, it is unknown what represents meaningful patient reported outcome improvement in the medium to long-term. The purpose of the present study was to define MCID, PASS and SCB at a minimum five years after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Secondarily, we sought to evaluate the time dependent nature of MCID, PASS and SCB.

Methods:

Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and March 2014 were included. Clinical and demographic data were collected in an institutional hip preservation registry. MCID, PASS, and SCB were calculated for each outcome score at 1-, 2-, and 5- years. MCID was calculated using a distribution-based method while PASS and SCB were calculated using an anchor method.

Results:

Two hundred and eighty-three patients were included with an average age of 34.2+11.9 years. The one year, two year and five-year MCID scores were as follows respectively: HOS-ADL (8.8, 9.7, 10.2); HOS-SS (13.9, 14.3, 15.2); mHHS (6.9, 9.2, 11.4) and iHOT-12 (15.1, 13.9, 15.1). PASS scores were as follows: HOS-ADL (89.7, 88.2, 99.2); HOS-SS (72.2, 76.4, 80.9); mHHS (84.8, 83.3, 83.6) and iHOT-12 (69.1, 72.2, 74.3). SCB scores were as follows: HOS-ADL (89.7, 91.9, 94.6); HOS-SS (78.1, 77.9, 85.8); mHHS (86.9, 85.8, 94.4) and iHOT-12 (72.6, 76.8, 87.5). More patients achieved MCID, SCB and PASS at two-year follow-up than at one-year follow-up. However, 79.3% of the patients achieved MCID by 5 years.

Conclusion:

The greatest proportion of patients achieve clinically significant outcome improvement at two-year follow-up after arthroscopic treatment of FAIS. Improvements are maintained out to five-year follow-up although there is a slight decrease in the proportion of patients achieving clinical significance.

Table 1.

Frequency of patients achieving any MCID, PASS, or SCB threshold at 1,2, and 5-years

1-year 2-year 5-year p-value
Any MCID 233 (82.6%) 247 (87.3%) 224 (79.3%) 0.035
Any PASS 191 (67.6%) 211 (74.9%) 191 (67.5%) 0.114
Any SCB 176 (62.3%) 190 (67.2%) 160 (56.6%) 0.034

Articles from Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES