Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2020 Aug 4;324(5):513–514. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7317

Prevalence, Characteristics, and Costs of Urgent Care Center Membership Programs

Walter Hsiang 1,, Grace Jin 1, Howard Forman 2, Daniel Wiznia 3
PMCID: PMC7403913  PMID: 32749481

Abstract

This study uses simulated patient phone calls to a random selection of US urgent care clinics (UCCs) to describe the proportion that offer membership programs with access to discounted visits for recurring fees and the characteristics (affiliations, accreditations, population income) and fees and charges of those that do.


Demand for urgent care centers (UCCs) has increased significantly over the last decade as patients seek timely and affordable health care.1 Some UCCs have begun membership programs that offer access to discounted visits for recurrent fees. We examined the prevalence, characteristics, and costs of UCCs offering membership programs in the United States.

Methods

This study received institutional review board exemption from the Yale School of Medicine. Five UCCs (defined as walk-in clinics in an ambulatory medical facility outside of a hospital-based or freestanding emergency department) from each of the 50 states were randomly selected from the Solv Health Directory, a community-sourced listing of approximately 11 000 UCCs. Although Solv Health is a commercial directory, UCCs are not required to pay to be listed in the directory. Affiliation with a hospital or health system, association with a large national urgent care network (eg, Concentra and NextCare), and accreditation status were obtained from the directory and the UCCs’ websites. Median household income in each UCC’s zip code was obtained from the 2017 American Community Survey.2

Trained investigators posing as uninsured patients used a standardized script (eAppendix in the Supplement) to ask UCC receptionists about individual membership programs. Calls were made in August 2019, during which information about program eligibility and cost of an urgent care visit was collected.

Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Pro version 13. Characteristics between membership and nonmembership UCCs were compared using χ2 tests and unpaired t tests. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of 250 UCCs contacted, 15 (6%) offered membership programs. Membership programs were offered in 10 states, with 2 or 3 UCCs of the 5 contacted in 3 states offering such programs. Table 1 compares characteristics and differences between membership and nonmembership UCCs. Membership UCCs were significantly less likely to be affiliated with a hospital or health system compared with nonmembership UCCs and significantly more likely to belong to large nationwide networks. No significant differences in Joint Commission accreditation, Urgent Care Association accreditation, or income quartile of the UCC’s community were observed.

Table 1. Characteristics of Membership and Nonmembership UCCs.

Characteristics of UCC UCCs, No. (%) P valueb
Overall (N = 250)a Membership (n = 15) Nonmembership (n = 235)
Affiliation with hospital or health network 117 (47) 2 (13) 115 (49) .01
Association with large national urgent care network 30 (12) 7 (47) 23 (10) <.001
Joint Commission accredited 24 (10) 0 24 (10) .37
Urgent Care Association accredited 21 (8) 1 (7) 20 (9) .80
Income quartile of UCC zip code relative to the state .90
Lowest 30 (12) 1 (7) 29 (12)
Second 47 (19) 3 (20) 44 (19)
Third 72 (29) 4 (27) 68 (29)
Highest 101 (40) 7 (47) 94 (40)

Abbreviation: UCC, urgent care center.

a

Indicates all UCCs included in this study.

b

P values reflect the comparison between membership UCCs and nonmembership UCCs using the Fisher exact test (for comparisons with frequency <5) and the χ2 test.

Respondents from all 15 membership programs reported that any patient, regardless of insurance status, could enroll. Membership fees ranged from $50 per year to $800 per year (mean, $373 [SD, $225]), discounted visit fees for members from $0 to $125 per year (mean, $47 [SD, $38]), and full-price visit fees for nonmembers from $90 to $275 per year (mean, $149 [SD, $43]). Visit fees for members were statistically significantly less for members vs nonmembers (difference, $102; 95% CI, $72-$132; P < .001) (Table 2).

Table 2. Costs, Benefits, and Services of Individual Membership Programs at 15 UCCs.

Statea Individual membership fees, $ Visit price, $ Included membership benefits and services
Per month Per yearb Member Nonmember
Arizona 39c,d 468 39 170 Excludes preventive services, motor vehicle crash injuries, durable medical equipment, prescription medications, and outside laboratory testing or imaging
Arizona NR 65d 125
Arizona NR 50d 79 129 Most procedures $159-$299; discounts for x-rays, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms; additional costs for medications, durable medical equipment, and vaccinations
Californiae 20d 240 68 200 10%-60% Discount on services
Colorado 39c,d 468 39 145 Excludes preventive services, motor vehicle crash injuries, durable medical equipment, prescription medications, and outside laboratory testing or imaging
Coloradoe 20d 240 68 140 10%-60% Discount on services
Connecticut 50d 600 0 135 Unlimited visits; discounted in-house services including laboratory testing, x-rays, and procedures
Floridaf 50d 600 10 120 All in-house services included, plus discounted bloodwork
Georgia 39c,d 468 25 129 Includes examination, laboratory testing, and some injectable medicines
Georgia NR 399d
Illinois NR 800d 0 90 Includes 6 visits per year, bloodwork, x-rays, Papanicolaou test, and electrocardiogram; discounts available for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
Nevadae 20d 240 68 145 10%-60% Discount on services
Texase,f 20d 240 68 160 10%-60% Discount on services
Texase,f 50d 600 0 275 One well visit per year; unlimited urgent care visits, blood pressure check, venipuncture, and vaccination
Texas 18d 216 79 129 Unlimited urgent care visits; discounted nonurgent care health benefits such as dental, vision, and pharmacy
Utahf 50d 600 10 129 Unlimited primary care and urgent care visits; includes any in-clinic procedures and offers discounted blood tests, telemedicine, and virtual monitoring

Abbreviations: NR, not reported; UCC, urgent care center.

a

Some UCCs (shown by state) are listed more than once because they offer more than 1 plan.

b

Unless otherwise indicated, values show the calculated annual fee determined by multiplying the quoted monthly fee by 12.

c

Two individual membership options were presented. The short-term $39-per-month option was excluded from the cost analysis.

d

Indicates fee as directly quoted by the UCC.

e

These UCCs all belonged to the same national urgent care network.

f

Four UCCs quoted new member fees: $135 for Connecticut, $50 for Florida, $135 for Texas, and $20 for Utah.

Discussion

A small number of UCCs in 10 states offered membership programs. Similar programs have been observed in other practice settings, such as the direct primary care model, in which a primary care practice charges periodic and per-visit fees for its services.3 Compared with nonmembership UCCs, those offering memberships were more often unaffiliated with hospitals and associated with large national urgent care networks.

These membership programs may offer convenience and improve access to care for uninsured and underinsured patients. However, there are serious disadvantages, including limited continuity of care and additional fees for imaging and laboratory services. These programs are unlikely to save most people money. Membership fees do not contribute to insurance deductibles and cannot be paid using health savings accounts or flexible spending accounts, possibly increasing patient out-of-pocket costs. Given an estimated mean cost savings of $100 per visit and a mean annual membership fee of $400, approximately 4 UCC visits per year would be needed to offset the membership fee.

Limitations include the small number of UCCs contacted per state, which may not be representative. Concentration of such programs in 3 states may suggest geographic localization of membership programs or sampling bias. The fixed sampling of UCCs per state may also overrepresent smaller states. Additionally, several membership UCCs in the sample belonged to the same national urgent care network. Therefore, any conclusions regarding the breadth of policies at the company level should consider the skewed overrepresentation of larger networks. Additionally, the cost analysis did not account for possible reimbursement by insurance.

Future research should examine changes in the prevalence of UCC membership programs and the effect of membership programs on accessibility, quality, and value of care.

Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Deputy Editor.

Supplement.

eAppendix. UCC Subscriptions Call Script

References

  • 1.Poon SJ, Schuur JD, Mehrotra A. Trends in visits to acute care venues for treatment of low-acuity conditions in the United States from 2008 to 2015. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(10):1342-1349. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.US Census Bureau 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Accessed July 2, 2020. https://data.census.gov/cedsci
  • 3.Eskew PM, Klink K. Direct primary care: practice distribution and cost across the nation. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28(6):793-801. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.06.140337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

eAppendix. UCC Subscriptions Call Script


Articles from JAMA are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES