Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2020 Aug 4;5(4):e00495-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00495-20

The Stringent Stress Response Controls Proteases and Global Regulators under Optimal Growth Conditions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Daniel Pletzer a,b,, Travis M Blimkie a, Heidi Wolfmeier a, Yicong Li a, Arjun Baghela a, Amy H Y Lee a,c, Reza Falsafi a, Robert E W Hancock a,
Editor: David W Clearyd
PMCID: PMC7406228  PMID: 32753509

Microorganisms need to adapt rapidly to survive harsh environmental changes. Here, we showed the broad influence of the highly studied bacterial stringent stress response under nonstressful conditions that indicate its general physiological importance and might reflect the readiness of bacteria to respond to and activate acute stress responses. Using RNA-Seq to investigate the transcriptional network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells revealed that >30% of all genes changed expression in a stringent response mutant under optimal growth conditions. This included genes regulated by global transcriptional regulators and novel downstream effectors. Our results help to understand the importance of this stress regulator in bacterial lifestyle under relatively unstressed conditions. As such, it draws attention to the consequences of targeting this ubiquitous bacterial signaling molecule.

KEYWORDS: ppGpp, relA, spoT, aprA, global transcriptional regulator, global regulatory networks, proteases, stringent response

ABSTRACT

The bacterial stringent stress response, mediated by the signaling molecule guanosine tetraphosphate, ppGpp, has recently gained attention as being important during normal cellular growth and as a potential new therapeutic target, which warrants detailed mechanistic understanding. Here, we used intracellular protein tracking in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, which indicated that RelA was bound to the ribosome, while SpoT localized at the cell poles. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) was used to investigate the transcriptome of a ppGpp-deficient strain under nonstressful, nutrient-rich broth conditions where the mutant grew at the same rate as the parent strain. In the exponential growth phase, the lack of ppGpp led to >1,600 transcriptional changes (fold change cutoff of ±1.5), providing further novel insights into the normal physiological role of ppGpp. The stringent response was linked to gene expression of various proteases and secretion systems, including aprA, PA0277, impA, and clpP2. The previously observed reduction in cytotoxicity toward red blood cells in a stringent response mutant appeared to be due to aprA. Investigation of an aprA mutant in a murine skin infection model showed increased survival rates of mice infected with the aprA mutant, consistent with previous observations that stringent response mutants have reduced virulence. In addition, the overexpression of relA, but not induction of ppGpp with serine hydroxamate, dysregulated global transcriptional regulators as well as >30% of the regulatory networks controlled by AlgR, OxyR, LasR, and AmrZ. Together, these data expand our knowledge about ppGpp and its regulatory network and role in environmental adaptation. It also confirms its important role throughout the normal growth cycle of bacteria.

IMPORTANCE Microorganisms need to adapt rapidly to survive harsh environmental changes. Here, we showed the broad influence of the highly studied bacterial stringent stress response under nonstressful conditions that indicate its general physiological importance and might reflect the readiness of bacteria to respond to and activate acute stress responses. Using RNA-Seq to investigate the transcriptional network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells revealed that >30% of all genes changed expression in a stringent response mutant under optimal growth conditions. This included genes regulated by global transcriptional regulators and novel downstream effectors. Our results help to understand the importance of this stress regulator in bacterial lifestyle under relatively unstressed conditions. As such, it draws attention to the consequences of targeting this ubiquitous bacterial signaling molecule.

INTRODUCTION

To deal with stress and/or harmful environmental conditions, microbes can adopt versatile adaptive lifestyles. To enable such lifestyle changes to occur rapidly, bacteria have evolved complex hierarchical regulatory networks to trigger diverse molecular responses that alter gene expression and protein activity. Global regulatory systems enable the coordination of downstream effectors that help recognize and appropriately respond to new environments. In particular, microbial life depends on the ability to rapidly switch from favorable conditions, such as rapid growth in nutrient-rich media, to recognize and counteract external threats and switch into a survival mode (1). Here, we wondered whether such stress adaptations might also operate under optimal, rapid-growth conditions that are not usually considered stressful.

As long as sufficient and appropriate nutrients are provided and toxic agents are absent, bacteria continue to replicate, although in normal culture they eventually stop growing (e.g., in Escherichia coli at around two billion bacteria per ml). On a cellular and molecular level, the processes that they undergo during rapid growth are, however, likely quite stressful, with rapid replication, protein synthesis, cell division, and reorganization of the cell (2). For example, there is a disconnect between bacterial division every 20 to 40 min under optimal conditions and replication and segregation of the chromosomal DNA, which is 1,000 times the length of the cell and, thus, highly condensed, that requires 60 to 90 min (2). Furthermore, as the density of bacteria increases, they start to experience depletion of one or more essential nutrients/growth requirements and/or the formation of inhibitory products, such as organic acids, which eventually leads to the stationary phase (3). It is known that maintenance of bacteria in stationary phase is guided by the alternative stress/starvation sigma factor (σS) (4, 5) and the stringent stress response (3), which indicates that the cessation of growth in broth culture occurs under stressful circumstances. However, it is worth asking about the mechanistic impacts of such factors during rapid, apparently uninhibited growth.

One major mechanism for dealing with stress is the stringent stress response intermediated by the second messenger guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) (6, 7). The activation of the stringent stress response during amino acid starvation is due to the accumulation of uncharged, deacylated tRNA molecules in the cytosol that enter the ribosome A site and ultimately cause ribosome stalling (8). In most Gram-negative bacteria, two enzymes, RelA and SpoT, mediate ppGpp homeostasis. Recently, Winther et al. (9) showed that RelA binds to empty tRNA molecules in the cytosol and the tRNA-RelA complex further loads into the A-site of the ribosome. RelA becomes activated and synthesizes ppGpp after interaction with the large Sarcin-Ricin loop of the 23S rRNA (9). On the other hand, SpoT, a bifunctional enzyme with weak ppGpp synthetase activity as well as a ppGpp degradative function, controls the balance of cellular ppGpp levels through its hydrolase activity (10). SpoT is mainly regulated by other environmental stress and starvation signals, including carbon, phosphate, iron, or fatty acid starvation (7). The stringent stress response leads to the dysregulation of a third or more of bacterial genes, enabling stressed cells to divert resources away from growth and division and toward stress coping mechanisms to promote survival until nutrient conditions improve (7).

Mutants lacking RelA and SpoT are unable to produce ppGpp and consequently have multiple defects in coping with stress and show reduced virulence in animal models (1115). Interestingly, during exponential growth, basal levels of ppGpp in Bacillus subtilis act as one of the major regulators of GTP homeostasis (16), while in E. coli ppGpp influences negative supercoiling (17) and modestly affects bacterial growth rates in Luria Broth but not M9 glucose minimal medium (18). Recently, ppGpp has been shown to bind to two separate sites on the RNA polymerase, (i) the β′-ω subunit and (ii) the interface between the β′ subunit and the transcription factor DksA. DksA works in concert with ppGpp as a coregulator that amplifies the impact of ppGpp (19). During starvation, cells accumulate ppGpp that interferes with σ70 binding to promoters and consequently allows for the binding of alternative factors, such as σS and σ32, that can redirect the RNA polymerase to energy-saving processes (20, 21). The fact that ppGpp has been shown to interfere with binding of a variety of σ factors to the core RNA polymerase (21, 22) raises the question as to what happens at the transcriptional level when ppGpp is absent. We hypothesized that the absence of a regulatory element impacting RNA polymerase should have substantial transcriptional consequences even under nonstressful conditions. This was further supported by the recent work of Sanchez-Vazquez et al. (23) that demonstrated that overproduction of ppGpp in E. coli, after only 5 min and in the absence of any obvious stress, led to the altered expression of more than 750 transcripts dependent on ppGpp binding to the RNA polymerase.

Here, we investigated the promoter activity of the relA and spoT genes and examined their intracellular localization in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. We used a stringent response mutant and compared its transcriptional landscape to wild-type expression during an unstressed (rich medium) bacterial lifestyle where cells would be likely to mainly focus on growth and replication. Our findings strongly suggest that, in addition to its function in managing stress and growth rate, the stringent response also plays an important role during normal growth.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

RelA-YFP was observed in a helical arrangement in P. aeruginosa.

Bacterial growth rate is regulated and controlled in part by the availability and quantity of ribosomes and rRNA. In E. coli, ribosomal gene expression is controlled by ppGpp, which helps to maintain the association of charged tRNAs with the ribosome (24). In E. coli, Nakagawa et al. (25) and Sarubbi et al. (26) demonstrated that relA gene expression is under dual promoter control, with one promoter constitutively expressed and one activated temporarily during the transition from exponential to stationary growth phase. Here, we confirmed the dual-promoter activity of relA in P. aeruginosa PAO1 and the requirement of both promoters for maximum expression of RelA during amino acid starvation and in the stationary phase (see Data Set 1 in the supplemental material). At the translational level, the current working model indicates that RelA becomes activated when uncharged tRNA molecules enter the A-site of the ribosome. Activation of RelA and, thus, synthesis of ppGpp, leads to the deactivation and release of RelA from the ribosome until it is reactivated by another stalled ribosome, a mechanism known as hopping between stalled ribosomes (8). This paradigm for the association between the ribosome and RelA has recently been challenged, and it has been suggested that the interaction between RelA and uncharged tRNA does not necessarily involve the ribosome. Nevertheless, activation of RelA only occurs when a RelA-tRNA complex enters the A-site of a stalled ribosome (9). This is supported by cryo-electron microscopy structures of ribosome-bound RelA-tRNA complexes, shown by Li et al. (27) and others (28, 29), where they revealed that RelA synthesizes ppGpp only when bound to the 70S subunit of the ribosome.

This prompted us to further investigate, in P. aeruginosa, the subcellular localization of RelA when fused to yellow fluorescence protein (YFP). At single-cell resolution, we identified the helical spatial distribution of RelA-YFP (twisted with alternating bands around the DNA-rich nucleoid area) (Fig. 1A), similar to that observed for ribosomes in E. coli (3032), indicating that, as for E. coli, RelA was likely bound to the ribosomes in P. aeruginosa when overexpressed. Our data were also in accordance with those of English et al. (33), where they used in single-molecule experiments to show that RelA was bound to the ribosome under nonstarvation conditions. We further investigated the subcellular localization of RelA-YFP upon stress induction using either serine-hydroxamate (SHX) to mimic amino acid starvation or stationary-phase growth of P. aeruginosa cultures. While a very similar distribution of RelA-YFP was observed after stress induction, there was a significantly higher coefficient of variation (Fig. 1C), consistent with increased fluorescence distribution as spots within the cell (as opposed to equally distributed signal). This was consistent with an interpretation that RelA was bound to the ribosome but dissociated to some extent during stress.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Subcellular localization of RelA-YFP and SpoT-GFP fusions in P. aeruginosa PAO1. Cells were grown in BM2 to mid-exponential phase, and fluorescent constructs were induced with 5% l-arabinose for 30 min prior to individual stress treatments. Cells were washed in PBS, and subsequently the DNA was counterstained with Hoechst 3342 DNA stain (blue). (A) RelA-YFP cultures were treated with or without (control) 1 mM SHX at an OD of 0.5 for 30 min. Stationary-phase cultures were grown to an OD of 2.5 ± 0.3 before induction with 5% l-arabinose. (B) SpoT-GFP cultures were transferred into BM2 (control) or BM2 without carbon source or were treated with 1 mM of the iron chelator dipyridyl at an OD of 0.5 for 30 min. Stationary-phase cultures were grown to an OD of 2.5 ± 0.3 before induction with 5% l-arabinose. (A and B) The pictures to the very right show a single cell under uninduced (control) conditions. The rectangle indicates the identification of single cells that have been used to measure fluorescence intensity. (C) RelA-YFP fluorescence intensity (left) and coefficient of variation (right) with or without (control) 1 mM SHX and in stationary phase. (D) SpoT-GFP fluorescence intensity (left) and coefficient of variation (right) without stress (control) and upon removal of the carbon source, addition of 1 mM iron chelator dipyridyl, and stationary phase. (C and D) Statistics were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunn’s multiple-comparison test; P < 0.01 (**). The percent coefficient of variation is standard deviation (intensity) divided by mean (intensity) times 100. The higher the coefficient percentage, the higher the likelihood of individual spots in the cells, while a lower percentage indicates a rather equally distributed signal. Rel-YFP (n = 520 to 1,700 cells) and SpoT-GFP (n = 750 to 1,500 cells) were used.

SpoT-GFP localized at the cell pole in P. aeruginosa.

We utilized a SpoT-GFP fusion protein to visualize its subcellular localization and found that under normal growth conditions, the fusion protein localized at the cell pole and the septal ring of elongated cells (Fig. 1B). Bacterial cells are well-organized factories where cellular asymmetry and compartmentalization play a vital role in many cellular processes (34). In recent years, the importance of localization of certain proteins at the pole of rod-shaped bacteria has become increasingly evident, with such proteins being crucial for fundamental cellular and regulatory processes (including chromosome segregation, cell cycle, chemotaxis, adhesion, and motility) as well as virulence (34, 35). Intriguingly, the manifestation of pili or flagella at a specific pole allows bacteria to quickly move through the environment and associate with, e.g., mucosal surfaces, which is interesting given the polar localization of SpoT and the role of ppGpp in such processes (36, 37). The localization at the division septum was consistent with results in Caulobacter, where SpoT was found to be involved in blocking the initiation of DNA replication and regulation of DnaA, a conserved replication initiator protein (38), although we did not investigate this potential function here.

Intriguingly, upon stress induction by either carbon or iron (dipyridyl treatment) limitation, the median signal intensity of the SpoT-GFP complex decreased by 5.7-fold and 4-fold, respectively, and the signal became more uniformly distributed. The decreased coefficient of variation correlated with irregular fluorescence observed across the cells (Fig. 1B and D). This observation might relate to the ppGpp hydrolyzing activity of SpoT, which presumably maintains ppGpp homeostasis; indeed, inside the cell, ppGpp molecules are broadly distributed and bind to ribosomes that are found around the nucleoid and at the cell poles (30).

Transcriptional changes dependent on ppGpp occurred during normal growth.

Since both RelA and SpoT were obviously present during logarithmic growth under nutrient-rich conditions (Fig. S1 and S2) (17, 18), we investigated a role for ppGpp under such circumstances. Interestingly, there were no obvious or significant differences, for the studied strains, on growth during the logarithmic phase in three different media (Fig. S3), which contrasted with results in E. coli (18), where they used a different growth methodology to avoid spontaneous suppressor mutants. To understand underlying mechanisms, Gaca et al. (39) used microarrays to show that a ppGpp-deficient strain, in the Gram-positive bacterium Enterococcus faecalis, altered expression in the exponential phase of growth of 246 genes, including genes influencing pyruvate production and GTP homeostasis. Here, we utilized the more comprehensive method of transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) to test the effect that the absence of ppGpp had on the transcriptome under nutrient-rich, nonstressful conditions in P. aeruginosa.

FIG S1

Genomic orientation of the ppGpp synthase relA (PA0934) in P. aeruginosa PAO1 and promoter activity in a PAO1 WT and an arginine auxotroph mutant. (A) The relA gene shown in an operon with the cysteine synthase (cysM, PA0932) and RNA methyltransferase (ygcA, PA0933) (thin arrow below genes). σ factor binding sites for RpoH (σ32; heat shock) and RpoS (σ38; stationary phase, starvation) are indicated by the dotted lines upstream of relA and cysM, respectively. (B and C) The cysM and relA promoter, respectively, was fused to the mCherry reporter gene and grown over a period of 16 h in BM2 broth in a 96-well plate with continuous shaking (567 cpm) with 6.5 and 12.5 μM arginine in PAO1 wild type (left) and PAO1 ΔargB mutant (right). Measurements were taken every hour at the OD600 for absorbance (B) and red fluorescence (mCherry expression) at excitation of 580 nm and emission of 610 nm (C). The first significant time point of the signal over time point 1 is indicated for the relA-mCherry (*) and cysM-mCherry (+). The occurrence of the first significant difference between the two constructs is indicated with a number symbol. (D and E) The cysM-relA promoters were fused to the mCherry reporter gene and grown over a period of 16 h in BM2 broth in a 96-well plate with continuous shaking (567 cpm) with 6.5 and 12.5 μM arginine in PAO1 (left) and PAO1 ΔargB mutant (right). Measurements were taken every hour at the OD600 for absorbance (D) and red fluorescence (mCherry expression) at excitation of 580 nm and emission of 610 nm (E). (B to E) The values are the means from three biological and six technical replicates; error bars represent the standard errors of the means. Comparisons were analyzed with a two-tailed Student’s t test and significant differences indicated at P < 0.05. Download FIG S1, EPS file, 0.4 MB (423.2KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Promoter activity of an rpoZ-spoT transcriptional fusion to GFP in a PAO1 WT. The rpoZ-spoT promoter fused to GFP measured at the OD600 for absorbance (left) and green fluorescence (right) at excitation of 488 nm and emission of 509 nm. The values are the means from three biological and six technical replicates grown in BM2 medium; error bars represent the standard errors of the means. Download FIG S2, EPS file, .04 MB (400.8KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Deletion of relA and spoT had no obvious impact on growth in three different media. (A) King’s B (KB). (B) Double yeast tryptone (2YT). (C) Synthetic cystic fibrosis medium (SCFM). A minor effect was observed in the rate of death during stationary phase only in SCFM minimal medium, whereby the PAO1 ΔrelA ΔspoT strain died at a lower rate, which could be complemented by introduction of the relA gene. (A to C) Bacterial growth in a 96-well plate with continuous shaking (567 cpm) for 16 h at 37°C. OD600 absorbance was measured every hour. Download FIG S3, EPS file, 0.1 MB (66.1KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

RNA-Seq was performed on the P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild type and a strain lacking the ability to produce ppGpp (ΔrelA ΔspoT double mutant) during exponential growth (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] of 0.5) under nutrient-rich conditions (double yeast tryptone [2YT] broth). This revealed 1,673 dysregulated genes with a fold change of ±1.5 and an adjusted (for false discovery) P value of <0.05 (Data Set S1). Expression of a subset of 15 genes (with a fold change around the ±1.5 cutoff) was validated using quantitative real-time-PCR (qRT-PCR), demonstrating similar expression trends and an overall R2 correlation coefficient of 0.66 (P < 0.01) (Fig. S4).

FIG S4

Scatter plot of the correlation between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR expression for genes around the threshold cutoff (fold change of ±1.5). Verification of RNA-Seq data was performed on the same RNA for the following 15 genes: PA0652, PA0675, PA0762, PA0893, PA1270, PA1282, PA1430, PA2237, PA2426, PA3385, PA3410, PA3462, PA3899, PA5261, and PA5344. Download FIG S4, EPS file, 0.2 MB (188.8KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DATA SET S1

Differentially expressed gene set. Download Data Set S1, XLSX file, 0.6 MB (616.6KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment (KEGG) were used for functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed (DE) genes identified when comparing the PAO1 stringent response mutant to the PAO1 wild type. This demonstrated the upregulation of six pathways (including biosynthetic and metabolic processes, as well as the type 3 secretion system [T3SS] and cell surface signaling pathways) and downregulation of six pathways (including cell transport, type 2 and 6 secretion systems, and acetyltransferase activity) in GO (Fig. 2A), while KEGG analysis indicated the downregulation of six pathways (including chemotaxis, quorum sensing, and amino acid and fatty acid metabolism) (Fig. 2B). Upregulation, in the stringent response mutant, of the type 3 secretion system was interesting, since this system requires bacterial cells to contact with the host to directly inject its substrates that include cytotoxins (40). In contrast, several genes encoding type 2 secretion systems (PA3095 to PA3103, Xcp genes that mediate exoprotease secretion and PA0677 to PA0689, Hxc genes, and effector LapA) and type 6 secretion systems (T6SS) (Fig. 2A) were downregulated in the mutant. The T6SS, found on three different loci on the chromosome (H1-T6SS, PA0074 to PA0091; H2-T6SS, PA1656 to PA1671; and H3-T6SS, PA2359 to PA2371) target other bacteria by secreting effector proteins that can inhibit or kill them through a contact delivery system (41). The H2 and H3 systems are important P. aeruginosa pathogenesis mediators (42). Although GO analysis indicated that the T6SS were overall downregulated in the stringent response mutant (Fig. 2A), the H1 system was actually upregulated. This agrees with others who showed that H1-T6SS is repressed when quorum sensing is highly active, whereas such circumstances activate H2 and H3 (42). Indeed, regulation of the T6SSs might be under quorum-sensing control, since quorum-sensing pathways were downregulated in our KEGG analysis (Fig. 2B).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

GO enrichment, KEGG analysis, and circular visualization of the differential expressed genes between the P. aeruginosa PAO1 ΔrelA ΔspoT stringent stress response mutant and wild-type strain under planktonic conditions. (A) Results of GO term enrichment performed by GOfuncR on the list of differentially expressed genes, upregulated (left; red) and downregulated (right; green). GO terms were considered significant with a q value of ≤0.2. (B) Results of KEGG enrichment performed by GAGE analysis with a threshold of a q value of ≤0.2. (A and B) Dot size indicates total number of genes annotated to a particular term/pathway. Gene ratio represents the proportion of total genes assigned to a term that are differentially expressed. (C) Neighboring genes within the DE genes across the chromosome (left). The inner track of the Circos plot shows log2 fold change (gray). All significant values with adjusted P value of <0.05 are highlighted in red (log2 fold change, >0.585) and green (log2 fold change, <−0.585). The numbers around the expression pattern show identified regions where a minimum of five consecutive genes were dysregulated in the same direction. The outer track shows the location of the genes (PA0001 to PA5420) on the PAO1 chromosome without the PA prefix. Heatmap of the 34 regions color-coded based on up- (red) or downregulation (green) of the set of the five consecutive dysregulated genes (right). See Data Set S2 for the full list of genes and annotation.

DATA SET S2

Cluster overview and curated PAO1 lists. Download Data Set S2, XSLX file, 0.6 MB (162.2KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Quorum sensing is a complex network that cells use for cell-to-cell communication. The quorum-sensing network follows a hierarchy with LasR at the top directly influencing transcriptional regulators, such as qscR, vqsR, and rhlR, which regulate another set of regulators, such as two-component response systems (e.g., gacAS and pprAB), which in turn further regulate quorum sensing (43, 44). The stringent response is known to activate quorum sensing in Pseudomonas through increased expression of lasR and rhlR when relA was overexpressed, indicating that quorum sensing can be activated independently of cell density (45), which is in accordance with our data.

We also observed that differential expression often involved coexpressed neighboring genes. This could be visualized by projecting differentially expressed genes onto the circular chromosome (Fig. 2C), which revealed 34 clusters of genes (total of 289 genes, 17% differentially expressed genes) with multiple genes with a similar direction of expression that had a broad array of functions. Indeed, within these clusters, we observed differential expression of genes involved in various secretion systems, transporters, quorum sensing, pyocin synthesis, vitamin B12 synthesis, heme export, cytochrome c synthesis, ethanol oxidation, sulfur and carbon metabolism, biofilm formation, fatty acid and lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, polyamine transport, adherence, ribosomes, and other biosynthetic gene synthesis systems (Data Set S2). Intriguingly, only genes in 8 out the 34 clusters were organized in operons.

The stringent response is required for environmental adaptations.

Since the ΔrelA ΔspoT stringent response double mutant grew normally during the logarithmic phase, we postulated that during normal growth the stringent response controls processes that prepare cells for more stressful situations, including environmental adaptations. Therefore, we examined the RNA-Seq data with this in mind.

Once bacteria have invaded host tissues, they must immediately deal with stresses imposed by host responses. One element assisting the initiation of colonization of P. aeruginosa and counteracting host responses is direct cytotoxicity toward host cells that processes epithelial surfaces, enables adhesion, and counteracts the action of phagocytic cells (46). Stringent response mutants demonstrate decreased cytotoxicity toward human bronchial epithelial cells as well as minimal hemolytic activity compared to that of the wild type (12). This was consistent with the finding here that many prominent cytolytic proteases were under the control of the stringent response under rapid growth conditions, as judged by their downregulation in the double mutant, including LasA elastase (−7.3-fold), LasB elastase (−7.8-fold), protease IV (piv; −3.2-fold), alkaline protease AprA (−9.6-fold), and PA3535 (−2.1-fold); similarly, the heat-stable hemolysin/rhamnolipid (synthesized by rhlABC, −4.5-, −8.3-, and −8.7-fold, respectively) was substantially downregulated (Data Set S1). This is also generally consistent with the role of the stringent response in adjusting to amino acid deprivation, since extracellular proteases could digest proteins in the environment, creating an additional source of needed amino acids. Nevertheless, protease upregulation by ppGpp under normal growth conditions could be considered preparatory to more stressful circumstances.

Conversely, as mentioned above there was upregulation by about 2-fold of the T3SS machinery and regulatory genes in several adjacent operons (PA1699 to PA1725) (Fig. 2) as well as the effector/toxin exoT. Both of these observations could be related in part to stringent regulation of quorum-sensing genes under rapid growth conditions, since we observed downregulation in the ΔrelA ΔspoT stringent response double mutant of rhlI (−3.0-fold), rhlR (−2.6-fold), lasR (−1.6-fold), rsaL (−3.0-fold), pqsH (−2.0-fold), and pqsL (−3.6-fold; cf. pqsA-E, which were 3.9- to 4.6-fold upregulated). Exoproteases and hemolysin are upregulated during quorum sensing, which, in turn, is upregulated by ppGpp, whereas T3SS genes are negatively controlled by RhlI (47).

The ability to respond rapidly is necessary to accommodate sudden environmental changes, and the failure to adapt can have negative or even lethal consequences to the organism. Consistent with a role in preparing for environmental adaptation, the stringent response was shown to be required for swarming motility, rhamnolipid production, adherence, and pyoverdine and pyocyanin production in strain PAO1 (Fig. S5), in accordance with previous studies (12, 37, 48). P. aeruginosa cells that encounter semiviscous conditions with a poor nitrogen source are driven to swarm rapidly across surfaces (49). Intriguingly, while the stringent response double mutant was unable to swarm, we found that, in rich-medium liquid broth, where even the wild type fails to swarm, genes required for swarming, such as LasB (50), were strongly dysregulated in the ΔrelA ΔspoT mutant. Indeed, 29% (60 out of 207) of the genes that are known (PAO1 orthologues from Yeung et al. [49]) to influence swarming motility (49) were either upregulated (30 genes) or downregulated (30 genes) in the ΔrelA ΔspoT stringent response mutant. Included in these were regulators required for normal swarming motility, with five (rhlIR, lasR, rsaL, mvaT, and oruR) that were downregulated in the mutant (i.e., positively regulated by the stringent response) and three that were upregulated (gbuR, phoQ, and nosR). Intriguingly, the two-component response regulator gacA actually suppresses swarming, and mutants in this gene demonstrate hyperswarming phenotypes (49); correspondingly, it was 1.8-fold upregulated in the mutant (i.e., suppressed in the WT by ppGpp). We hypothesize that this large proportion of gene expression changes, especially in regulatory genes, prepares for conditions of rapid adaptation to swarming motility.

FIG S5

Phenotypic confirmations of the P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild type, the stringent response mutant, and complements. (A) Swarming on KB agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. (B) Rhamnolipid production (yellow arrows indicate ring formation) at 37°C for 48 h. (C) Adherence to 96-well polypropylene plates in 2YT, KB, and SCFM medium at room temperature for 1 h. Data normalized to wild-type adherence. (D) Pyoverdine production normalized to wild-type production. (E) Pyocyanin production. (C to E) Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple-comparison test; P values were <0.05 (*) and 0.01 (**) compared to the wild type. Experiments were performed at least three times. Error bars indicate ± standard errors. Download FIG S5, EPS file, 1.5 MB (1.5MB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Swarming and the expression of flagella are also necessary to prepare cells for cell-to-cell or cell-to-surface adherence (49). The Pseudomonas permeability regulator (PprB, PA4296) controls the tad (tight adherence) locus and positively regulates fimbria assembly (51) and flp pilus assembly; therefore, it is a key regulator required for adhesion (52). The tad locus (PA4302 to PA4306, cluster 33), the type IVb pilin flp, and the usher- and chaperone-encoding cupE1 were >2-fold, 7.1-fold, and 2.8-fold downregulated in the stringent response mutant (Fig. 2C and Data Sets S1 and S2). This is in accordance with results for their corresponding regulator PprB, which was 4.7-fold downregulated. Induction of the stringent response led to the expression of pprB and tadG (Table 1), suggesting that the stringent response regulates pilus assembly via PprB. Adaptation and attachment are the first steps before bacterial biofilm formation, which is also regulated by the stringent response (76). Consistent with this, we found that 31% (228 out of 734) of genes that are known to be required for biofilm formation in Pseudomonas (54) were either upregulated (92 genes) or downregulated (136 genes) in the ΔrelA ΔspoT mutant. Intriguingly, 11 biofilm regulators were also identified with 4 upregulated (including efflux pump repressor mexR, T3SS assembly regulator pcrH and repressor ptrB, and anti-sigma factor vreR) and 7 downregulated (including the two-component sensory protein pprA, the chloramphenicol resistance activator cmrA, and mycobactin siderophore uptake regulator femR). Overall, these data support the proposal that the stringent response regulates rapid adaptation to environmental changes.

TABLE 1.

Fold changes of P. aeruginosa PAO1 mRNA expressiona

Locus Gene Description or product Fold change relative to WT PAO1
ΔrelA ΔspoT WT + SHX WT + relA++
Differential effect of loss (ΔrelA ΔspoT) and overproduction of ppGpp (+SHX/relA++)
    PA0277 Zn-dependent protease with chaperone function 9.9 −5.2 −1.1
    PA0572 impA Hypothetical protein −9.1 2.8 1.3
    PA1245 aprX Type I secretion system −2.8 4.3 2.3
    PA1249 aprA Alkaline metalloprotease −9.6 4.1 2.0
    PA1384 galE UDP-glucose 4-epimerase −1.9 4.4 1.2
    PA1430 lasR Transcriptional regulator −1.6 −1.1 3.0
    PA1477 ccmC Heme exporter protein 1.6 −2.3 1.2
    PA1656 hsiA2 Type VI secretion protein −1.8 1.2 1.8
    PA1874 bapA Adhesion protein −4.3 3.0 2.0
    PA2016 liuR Regulator of liu genes −1.6 2.0 −1.4
    PA2050 RNA polymerase ECF-subfamily σ70 factor 2.5 −1.5 −1.1
    PA2227 vqsM Transcriptional regulator −1.7 1.4 2.5
    PA2259 ptxS Transcriptional regulator −1.9 2.4 −1.2
    PA2302 ambE Nonribosomal peptide synthetase −4.1 3.0 1.4
    PA2911 TonB-dependent receptor 8.0 −3.0 1.3
    PA3095 xcpZ General secretion pathway protein −2.4 1.9 1.1
    PA3326 clpP2 ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit −10.9 2.4 1.8
    PA3327 Nonribosomal peptide synthetase −21.0 8.0 2.0
    PA3462 Sensor/response regulator −1.5 2.2 1.1
    PA3607 potA Polyamine transport protein 2.9 −9.9 −1.1
    PA4210 phzA1 Phenazine biosynthesis protein −9.8 4.2 2.5
    PA4211 phzB1 Phenazine biosynthesis protein −7.9 12.7 1.9
    PA4296 pprB Two-component response regulator −4.7 3.8 1.7
    PA4297 tadG Pilus assembly −2.0 3.1 1.4
Smaller effect of either loss of ppGpp or overproduction (+SHX and/or relA++)
    PA0149 RNA polymerase ECF-subfamily σ70 factor 1.8 1.2 1.0
    PA0625 Pyocin production 6.8 1.2 1.2
    PA0652 vfr Transcriptional regulator −1.7 1.1 1.2
    PA0762 algU RNA polymerase σ factor AlgU 1.9 −1.2 1.0
    PA0893 argR Transcriptional regulator 1.1 −1.0 2.1
    PA1271 TonB-dependent receptor 3.4 −1.0 1.3
    PA1272 cobO Cob(I)alamin adenosyltransferase 2.4 −1.2 1.2
    PA1541 Drug efflux transporter 10.9 2.4 1.0
    PA1698 popN Type III secretion protein 3.3 −1.3 1.4
    PA2069 Carbamoyl transferase −8.1 1.4 1.4
    PA2193 hcnA Hydrogen cyanide synthase −3.2 −1.5 −1.1
    PA2231 pslA Exopolysaccharide biosynthesis 2.3 1.2 1.6
    PA2360 hsiA3 Type VI secretion protein −1.9 1.0 1.2
    PA2426 pvdS RNA polymerase ECF-subfamily σ70 factor −1.1 −18.1 −2.7
    PA3385 amrZ Alginate and motility regulator −1.0 1.0 2.1
    PA3410 hasI RNA polymerase ECF-subfamily σ70 factor 3.0 −1.4 1.0
    PA3661 Hypothetical protein 17.2 5.1 5.4
    PA3899 fecI RNA polymerase σ factor 1.9 −1.1 −1.1
    PA5261 algR Alginate biosynthesis regulatory protein −1.4 −1.2 2.1
    PA5344 oxyR Transcriptional regulator −1.1 1.2 1.9
a

Shown are the fold changes of P. aeruginosa PAO1 mRNA expression in the ΔrelA ΔspoT double mutant compared to the wild type (RNA-Seq data) and compared to the influence of overexpression in the WT of relA and induction with 1 mM serine hydroxamate (SHX) (qRT-PCR). Changes greater than 2-fold are presented in boldface.

The metalloprotease AprA, a novel downstream effector of the stringent stress response, was required for full virulence.

Since the stringent response has been shown to influence P. aeruginosa infection in multiple models (12, 14, 36, 37, 48, 55) and strongly regulated cytolytic proteases under normal growth conditions, we further investigated the importance of one of these, AprA, in a high-density murine skin infection model. The alkaline protease aprA (PA1249) was 4.1-fold upregulated upon SHX induction and 9.6-fold downregulated in the mutant. The deletion of the aprA gene did not affect lesion sizes (Fig. 3B) or bacterial counts (Fig. 3C) in the abscess. However, after 3 days there was a significant enhancement of survival (77%) of the mice infected with the aprA mutant over the mice infected with the wild-type PAO1 (∼33% survival of mice) (Fig. 3D). Therefore, AprA acts as a novel downstream effector of the stringent response and is required for full virulence under high-density infections; previous data have implicated this protein in the regulation of virulence and destruction of host defense systems (56).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Differentially expressed protease genes of the stringent response mutant compared to the wild type and alkaline protease mutant aprA in a high-bacterial-density skin infection model. (A) Circos plot of proteases and peptidases (www.pseudomonas.com and MEROPS) with downregulated (green) and upregulated (red) genes around the chromosome. Proteases that were not significant are delineated as gray. (B to D) PAO1 wild type (n = 15) and PAO1 aprA-deficient strain (n = 13) in a cutaneous mouse infection model. (B) Abscess sizes. (C) Bacterial load recovered from abscess tissue 3 days postinfection. (D) Survival percentage over the course of a 3-day experiment. Statistics were performed using the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test (P = 0.032) and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test (P = 0.025); a P value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Based on this result, we further examined protease-coding genes using the combined lists of peptidases/proteases from MEROPS (57) and the Pseudomonas Genome Database (58). It was found that 37.6% (73 of 194 genes; P < 0.001) of genes were significantly dysregulated in the stringent response mutant (Fig. 3A). We then focused on genes that were dysregulated in the double mutant, according to RNA-Seq, and showed an inverse correlation, using qRT-PCR, when ppGpp production was induced by SHX or relA overexpressed (Table 1).

The zinc-dependent protease PA0277 (5.2-fold downregulated by SHX induction, 9.9-fold upregulated in the mutant) is directly controlled by the posttranscriptional regulator RsmA (59), and the expression of rsmA is directly activated by AlgR (60) and indirectly via GacA through RsmY and RsmZ (61). The response regulators AlgR and GacA were controlled by the stringent stress response under normal conditions. Intriguingly, Bowden et al. (62) described a link between the stringent stress response and the loss of rsmA expression, which restored protease production in the plant pathogen Erwinia atrosepticum. This further supports our conclusions that proteases are downstream effectors of the stringent response in P. aeruginosa.

The immunomodulating metalloprotease impA (PA0572) was 2.8-fold upregulated by SHX and 9.1-fold downregulated in the mutant. ImpA is important during infection and protects P. aeruginosa from neutrophil attack by cleaving the P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 on neutrophils as well as targeting CD43 and CD44, involved in leukocyte homing (63). ImpA contains a LasR-regulated Xcp-dependent signal sequence (64), but SHX induction did not influence the expression of lasR. Therefore, impA might be under direct control of the stringent response. The putative caseinolytic peptidase clpP2 (PA3326) was 2.4-fold upregulated by SHX and 10.9-fold downregulated in the stringent response mutant; it is known to be involved in motility, biofilm formation, pigmentation, and iron scavenging (65). Thus, we investigated the impact of these proteases in the high-density murine skin infection model. There was no effect when transposon mutants in PA0277, ImpA, or ClpP2 were tested (data not shown).

Stringent regulation of global transcriptional regulators.

The large number of differentially expressed genes was apparently controlled in a hierarchical process. Thus, no fewer than 132 regulators were differentially expressed in the ΔrelA ΔspoT double mutant, with 79 being downregulated and 53 upregulated. More highly dysregulated and prominent regulators included alternative sigma factor and regulator of the general stress response and quorum-sensing rpoS (−3.8-fold), quorum-sensing regulators rhlIR (−3.0-fold and −2.6-fold) and rsaL (−3.0-fold), the global regulator of virulence and quorum sensing, vqsR (−2.5-fold), virulence sigma factor vreI (3.0-fold), cold shock protein cspD (−3.0-fold), upregulated T3SS repressor ptrB (8.1-fold), regulator pcrG (2.3-fold), DNA damage-inducible regulator lexA (2.3-fold), the alternative sigma factor involved in alginate biosynthesis, algU (1.9-fold), the aerobic ethanol oxidation system regulator erbR (6.8-fold), two-component system eraSR (6.2-fold and 4.1-fold), the nitrous oxide reduction regulator nosR (5.4-fold), the efflux pump activator brlR (2.4-fold), downregulated two-component regulators of CupE fimbrial assembly activation, pprBA (−1.8-fold and −4.7-fold), and PA4074 (−3.2-fold).

The potential that regulators such as these were mediating the very substantial effects of RelA and SpoT during logarithmic growth phase prompted us to further investigate global regulation in the ppGpp-deficient strain. The 1,673 DE genes were used to search for transcriptional regulators (Fig. 4A) that influenced their expression by filtering to retain the first individual differentially expressed in an operon; this reduced the list to 1,201 unique genes. Based on the location of the start of the gene, we then extracted the region 250 bp upstream of the transcriptional initiation sites for these genes (66) and searched for potential transcription factor binding site motifs. Motif-based sequence analysis (MEME) identified four significant motifs (Fig. 4B) that were further processed using the motif comparison tool Tomtom, which revealed several known global regulators from CollecTF, namely, VqsM, AlgR, AmrZ, PvdS, LasR, and OxyR (Fig. 4B). In the next step, the regulon of each regulator extracted from CollecTF (67) was further tested for statistical enrichment in the original list of differentially expressed genes, which revealed four significantly dysregulated regulons, AlgR (P < 0.02), OxyR (P < 0.02), LasR (P < 0.01), and AmrZ (P < 0.01); of these, only LasR was modestly 1.57-fold downregulated. The relevance of this analysis is indicated by the fact that global regulators like these control many downstream targets affected by the stringent response, as typified by LasR, a mediator of the 3-oxo-C12-acylhomoserinelactone-mediated quorum-sensing response (45).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Motif search and regulons of identified transcription factor binding sites from CollecTF. (A) Overview of the identification pipeline to find dysregulated regulators in RNA-Seq data (66). TSS; transcriptional start site. (B) Identified motifs of dysregulated genes by MEME and regulators by TomTom. (C) AlgR regulon (20 genes; 12 downregulated, 1 upregulated). (D) OxyR regulon (89 genes; 20 downregulated, 10 upregulated). (E) LasR regulon (83 genes; 36 downregulated, 15 upregulated). (F) AmrZ regulon (144 genes; 22 downregulated, 37 upregulated). (C to F) Red, upregulated; green, downregulated; blue, regulator; black, no change. Adjusted P value of ≤0.05, fold change of ±1.5. The outer track shows the location of the genes (PA0001 to PA5420) on the PAO1 chromosome without the PA prefix.

Global transcriptional regulators responded to relA overexpression but not SHX induction.

To further explore regulation by the stringent-response mediator, we overexpressed the relA gene in the WT and induced the production of ppGpp with SHX (Table 1). Intriguingly, the expression of several transcriptional regulators, including argR, lasR, vqsM, amrZ, algR, and, to some extent, oxyR, was only increased when relA was overexpressed but not when the stringent response was induced with SHX (Table 1). SHX treatment triggers stress, since it is basically equivalent to amino acid starvation, while relA overexpression should in principle only affect ppGpp levels. These situations are not precisely equivalent, and we would argue that relA overexpression more precisely mimics effects during normal growth while SHX reflects an alarm response. Alterations in ppGpp levels due to relA overexpression could lead to the shrinkage and depletion of the GTP and c-di-GMP pools that might interfere with transcriptional and translational downstream processes (68), although the added impact of SHX-induced starvation would be a major consideration.

In P. aeruginosa, low levels of c-di-GMP can trigger the activation of the global regulators such as AmrZ or AlgR. AmrZ, involved in biofilm production, iron homeostasis, and motility, has been shown to regulate diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases to modulate c-di-GMP (69, 70). Under conditions where ppGpp was not synthesized in the double mutant, we found that ∼44% (59 out of 144) of genes of the AmrZ regulon were dysregulated (Fig. 4F), including upregulated genes in polysaccharide production, psl (cluster 16) and pel (cluster 21), and downregulated genes in the type VI secretion hsi (cluster 10) (Fig. 2). A comparison to the chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq) analysis by Jones et al. (69) further revealed that ∼29% of the regulon (115 out of 398) was dysregulated in the stringent response mutant (with 74 genes in common between the two regulons). However, AmrZ-mediated regulation is itself quite complex, since AmrZ belongs to the regulon of the quorum-sensing regulator LasR (71).

In the stringent response mutant, ∼61% (51 of 83) of genes in the LasR network were dysregulated (Fig. 4E), including rhamnolipid rhl (cluster 25), biofilm matrix polysaccharide psl (cluster 16), type VI secretion hsi (cluster 10), quinolone quorum-sensing pqs (cluster 4), anti-metabolite amb (cluster 18), alkaline protease apr (cluster 7) (Fig. 2C and 4E), and various other exoenzymes mentioned above. Furthermore, we observed altered expression in the ΔrelA ΔspoT double mutant of 7 of the 10 genes with direct LasR binding sites in their promoters (71), namely, aprX-A, pqsH, rhlR, rsaL, pslA-M, ambB-E, and clpP2 (Data Set S1). A comparison to the ChIP-Seq analysis by Gilbert et al. (71) showed similar dysregulation of ∼64% (47 out of 74) of genes in the LasR regulon (with an overlap of 72 genes in both regulons).

The stringent response has been suggested to affect OxyR and might modify the cellular redox state (72). OxyR uses a redox-sensing mechanism to sense oxidative damage such as that caused by H2O2 in the cytoplasm in E. coli (73). When oxidized, it induces the expression of a catalase that further reduces H2O2. The stringent response is required for optimal catalase activity (72), which is in accordance with our finding that katA (PA4236) was 2.4-fold downregulated in the stringent response mutant. The OxyR regulon also controls quorum sensing, protein synthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, and iron homeostasis (53), and ∼34% (30 of 89) of regulon genes were dysregulated in the stringent response mutant (Fig. 4D). Similarly, the double mutant demonstrated altered expression of ∼34% (19 out of 56) of genes of the OxyR regulon identified by ChIP-Seq by Wei et al. (53), including ahpC, katA, dpS, PA2050, pntAA, aspS, and PA1541 (with a total overlap of 44 genes in the two published versions of the OxyR regulon).

AlgR is important for type IV pilus and alginate production and synthesis of c-di-GMP via the diguanylate cyclase MucR (74). Of the small known AlgR regulon in CollectTF, 65% (13 of 20) of genes were dysregulated in the double mutant (Fig. 4C), including genes encoding pilus, hydrogen cyanide production (hcn), and cytochrome c oxidase (cco). In addition, a ChIP-Seq analysis by Kong et al. (74) revealed a much larger regulon, and we found ∼31% (48 of 155) of those genes were dysregulated in the stringent response mutant, only one of which overlapped the CollectTF regulon.

The stress σ factor RpoS is interrelated with the stringent response and is known to operate during normal growth (75). Intriguingly, the regulatory networks of RpoS, as well as RpoN, RpoD, and AlgU, were significantly dysregulated in the stringent stress response mutant (Fig. S6), and alternative σ factors PA0149, PA0762 (algU), PA2050, PA2896 (sbrI), PA3410 (hasI), and PA3899 (fecI) were all upregulated in this mutant (Table 1 and Data Set S1). However, overexpression of relA or induction of the stringent response did not influence the expression of any of these σ factors, suggesting that their dysregulation in the mutant is because of binding and stability difficulties of the RNA polymerase due to missing ppGpp.

FIG S6

Manually curated list analysis of the differential expressed genes between the P. aeruginosa PAO1 ΔrelA ΔspoT stringent stress response mutant and wild-type strains. Gene ratio and set size for a number of curated gene lists from various sources (see Data Set S2) were calculated using Fisher’s exact test with multiple test correction (Benjamin-Hochberg method). Significant results were determined using an adjusted P value threshold of 0.05. Gene ratio represents the proportion of total genes assigned to a term that are differentially expressed. Download FIG S6, EPS file, 0.4 MB (396.1KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Conclusions.

In conclusion, we find that the P. aeruginosa stringent stress response influences not only global transcriptional regulators under normal growth conditions but also the expression of downstream effectors that potentially enable rapid adaptations. Our findings expand our knowledge about the stringent response and suggest it has an important role throughout the bacterial life. The stringent response, originally discovered as a stress response during amino acid starvation, influences the expression of hundreds of genes (15). It is now clear that the stringent response is more than just a response to starvation and that the production of the signaling molecule ppGpp strongly influences global gene expression of bacterial cells. Here, we further defined the stringent response as being required under nutrient-rich, rapid-growth conditions. This reinforces proposals that the stringent response is an excellent, novel target for the development of new antimicrobials (12, 76, 77). Further mechanistic understanding of downstream processes after stringent response signal blockage will help in the development of novel compounds for clinical use and reveal new targets among the downstream effectors, such as the alkaline protease AprA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.

Bacterial strains and plasmids are listed in Table S1A and 1B in the supplemental material. All organisms were cultured at 37°C in double yeast tryptone (2YT) or basal medium 2 (BM2) (78). Liquid cultures were placed with shaking at 250 rpm. Cultures harboring individual vectors were supplemented with 15 μg/ml gentamicin (Gm) and 100 μg/ml ampicillin (Ap) for E. coli and 50 μg/ml Gm and 250 μg/ml carbenicillin (Cb) for P. aeruginosa. Bacterial growth was monitored at the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) using either a spectrophotometer or a 96-well microtiter plate reader (Synergy H1; BioTek).

TABLE S1

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and PCR primers used in this study. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (22.4KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Molecular methods.

PCRs were carried out using Phusion DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, and optimized annealing temperatures for each primer set. PCRs were supplemented with 5% dimethyl sulfoxide. Restriction digestions were performed using Thermo Scientific FastDigest restriction enzymes according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All ligation reactions were carried out at room temperature using Thermo Scientific T4 DNA ligase. DNA purifications were performed using the GeneJET PCR purification kit (Thermo Scientific) or the GeneJET gel extraction kit (Thermo Scientific) by following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Construction of the PAO1 arginine argB auxotroph and alkaline protease aprA mutant.

The construction of both knockout vectors was based on the protocol by Zumaquero et al. (79) and carried out as previously described (80). Briefly, primers argB_up_fwd(Bam)/argB_up_rev and argB_down_fwd/argB_down_rev(Hind) were used to amplify the 500-bp knockout alleles for the argB gene from P. aeruginosa PAO1 genomic DNA. Primers aprA_up_fwd(Bam)/aprA_up_rev and aprA_down_fwd/aprA_down_rev(Hind) were used to amplify the 500-bp knockout alleles for the aprA gene from P. aeruginosa PAO1 genomic DNA (Table S1C). The obtained fragments were used in an overlapping PCR with up_fwd and down_rev primers. Next, each fusion fragment was cloned into the suicide vector pEX18Gm via BamHI/HindIII restriction sites and verified by sequencing. The generation of both mutants was based on the site-specific insertional mutagenesis strategy of Schweizer et al. (81) and carried out as described previously (82). To confirm the deletions, locus-specific primers that bind up- and downstream of the amplified knockout alleles were used (argB_outA/argB_outB or aprA_outA/aprA_outB) and the resulting knockout fragments verified by sequencing.

Cloning of the PAO1 relA, cysM, and rpoZ transcriptional promoter reporter fusions.

Transcriptional fusions between the relA promoter region and the mCherry gene were created using the primers relA-Pro_fwd(Xba)/relA-Pro_rev-mCherry_fwd to amplify the 84-bp relA promoter from PAO1 genomic DNA and mCherry_fwd-relA-Pro_rev/mCherry_rev_t0(Kpn-Apa) to amplify mCherry from plasmid pUCP23.mCh. The resulting fragments were gel purified and fused in another PCR with relA-Pro_fwd/mCherry_rev primers. The fusion product was cloned onto pUCP22 in the direction opposite that of the lac promoter via XbaI/KpnI restriction sites. Transcriptional fusions between the promoter regions of cysM (270 bp) and the mCherry gene were created on plasmid pUCP22. Therefore, the mCherry gene was flipped onto pUCP22 via EcoRI/BamHI, yielding mCherry in the direction opposite that of Plac. Next, the cysM promoter was amplified from PAO1 genomic DNA via cysM-Pro_fwd(Xba)/cysM-Pro_rev(Bam), gel purified, and cloned onto pUCP22.mCherry via XbaI/BamHI (yielding pUCP22.cysM-Pro.mCherry). Transcriptional fusions of the cysM promoter, the relA promoter, and the mCherry gene were created via amplification of the cysM promoter (270 bp) from genomic DNA using cysM-Pro_fwd(Xba)/cysM-Pro_rev(Spe). The obtained fragment was ligated via XbaI/SpeI in front of the relA promoter on plasmid pUCP22.relA-Pro.mCherry to yield pUCP22.cysM-relA-Pro.mCherry. All created constructs were confirmed by sequencing and transformed into the PAO1 wild type as well as the ΔargB auxotroph arginine mutant, as described earlier (82).

Transcriptional fusions between the promoter regions of rpoZ and the eGFP gene were created on plasmid pUCP23. The rpoZ promoter region (88 bp) was amplified via rpoZ-Pro_fwd(SacI)/rpoZ-Pro_rev-egfp_fwd from PAO1 genomic DNA and the eGFP gene from pBBR.TIR.egfp.t0 via egfp_fwd-rpoZ-Pro_rev/egfp_rev(Kpn). Both fragments were fused with a subsequent PCR using rpoZ-Pro_fwd/egfp_rev and further transferred onto pUCP23 via SacI/KpnI in the direction opposite that of the lac promoter. All created constructs were confirmed by sequencing and transformed into PAO1 as described earlier (82).

Promoter fusion constructs: fluorescence and growth curve experiments.

Overnight-grown bacteria (16 to 18 h) in 2YT medium at 37°C with shaking (250 rpm) were washed (8,000 rpm, 3 min), resuspended in BM2, and further diluted to an OD600 of 0.1. Two hundred microliters was transferred to a flat-bottom 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate (Corning). Plates were incubated at 37°C with continuous fast linear shaking at 567 cycles per minute (cpm) in a microplate reader (Synergy H1; BioTek). OD600 and fluorescence (mCherry and eGFP were detected at 580 to 610 nm and 488 to 509 nm, respectively) readings were taken every hour over a 16-h period. Experiments were performed three times with at least three technical replicates. Amino acid starvation growth experiments were performed with the PAO1 wild type and the ΔargB auxotroph arginine mutant, both carrying promoter fusion constructs, in minimal medium BM2 without NH4Cl and supplementation of 6.25 μM or 12.5 μM arginine. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired one-sided t test where each time point was compared to the starting time point to identify a significant increase in promoter activity.

Cloning of the inducible relA and spoT constructs.

The relA gene was PCR amplified from PAO1 genomic DNA with primers relA_fwd(Xba)/relA_rev(Hind). The amplified product was gel purified and cloned into pHERD20T via XbaI/HindIII to allow expression from the pBAD promoter and subsequently sequenced. The spoT gene was PCR amplified from PAO1 genomic DNA with primers spoT_fwd/spoT_rev(Hind). The amplified product was gel purified, digested with HindIII, and cloned into pHERD20T via SmaI/HindIII to allow expression from pBAD and was subsequently sequenced. Each plasmid was transformed into the P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild type as previously described (82).

Cloning of the RelA-YFP and SpoT-GFP translational reporter fusions.

The relA gene was PCR amplified from PAO1 genomic DNA with primers relA_fwd/relA_rev. Both primers had an EcoRI restriction site incorporated. The reverse primer lacked the RelA stop codon. The amplified product was cloned onto pBAD24.yfp via EcoRI and orientation verified via restriction digest and sequencing. The resulting pBAD24.relA-linker-yfp plasmid was digested with BamHI, treated with S1 nuclease, and further digested with HindIII. The resulting fragment was transferred onto pHERD20T via HindIII/SmaI.

The spoT gene was PCR amplified from PAO1 genomic DNA with primers spoT_fwd/spoT_rev-link-gfp_fwd. The reverse primer lacked the SpoT stop codon and had an in-frame linker sequence (ATGGTGTCTATCACTAAAGATCAAATC) fused to the forward sequence of egfp. The egfp gene was amplified from pBBR1.TIR.egfp.t0 with primers gfp-fwd-link-spoT-rev/egfp-rev, whereby the gfp-fwd primer was the reverse complement primer of the spoT-rev primer to allow the fusion of both fragments in a second PCR with spoT_fwd and gfp_rev primers. The amplified product was gel purified, digested with HindIII, and cloned into pHERD20T via SmaI/HindIII before sequencing. Reporter fusions were verified as described below.

Functional verification of the RelA-YFP and SpoT-GFP reporter fusions using swarming.

Since the fluorescence fusions were in-frame at the C-terminal end of the gene of interest, a fluorescent signal would indicate a correctly folded fusion protein. However, overexpression of fusion proteins can lead to misfolding and subsequent sequestering into insoluble inclusion bodies (83). To verify that both fusion proteins were correctly folded and functional, we complemented the ΔrelA ΔspoT double mutant with either RelA-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) or SpoT-green fluorescent protein (GFP) and tested the ability of the strain to swarm on semisolid agar plates (BM2 plates containing 0.4% agar). The PAO1 stringent response double mutant is unable to swarm (Fig. S7) (37, 84). The PAO1 wild-type strain as well as the ΔrelA ΔspoT mutant were transformed with an empty pHERD20T vector control and RelA-YFP and SpoT-GFP fusions. All strains were scraped from overnight-grown plates and suspended in sterile demineralized water to an OD600 of 0.025. Ten microliters of a bacterial cell suspension was applied onto a swarming agar plate and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Experiments were repeated at least three times. The motility complementation further verified an intact fusion protein (Fig. S6).

FIG S7

Verification of functional RelA-YFP and SpoT-GFP in the PAO1 ΔrelA ΔspoT stringent stress response mutant. Shown is swarming on BM2 agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Representative images of the swarming-deficient stringent stress response mutant (left) and the complementation with RelA-YFP (middle) or SpoT-GFP (right) are shown. Experiments were repeated three times. Download FIG S7, EPS file, 0.8 MB (881.3KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Growth and confocal microscopy of protein fusions.

Cultures harboring the RelA-YFP construct were grown in BM2 (at 250 rpm) to an OD600 of 0.3 prior to induction with 5% l-arabinose. After 30 min of induction, cultures were split and one received with 1 mM SHX for another 30 min. Stationary-phase cultures at an OD of 2.5 ± 0.3 were induced with 5% l-arabinose for 30 min. Cultures harboring SpoT-GFP were grown to an OD600 of 0.3 before induction with 5% l-arabinose for 30 min. Cultures were washed one time with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (8,000 rpm, 5 min) before resuspending in BM2 with or without a carbon source for 30 min. Iron starvation was induced with 1 mM dipyridyl for 30 min.

To visualize the fluorescent protein localization in cells, the fluorescent proteins were cross-linked to achieve minimal cell movement and preserve the physiological state. Cells were cross-linked with 3.7% formaldehyde at room temperature for 1 h. Cells were washed twice with PBS by centrifugation (8,000 rpm, 5 min) and the subsequent pellet resuspended in 1 ml of PBS. Cells were visualized on a Zeiss microscope.

Growth, induction, and RNA isolation for qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq.

P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild-type, ΔrelA ΔspoT double mutant, as well as relA- and spoT-overexpressing strains were grown to an OD600 of 0.5 in 2YT broth. Induction experiments were carried out with either 1 mM SHX to chemically induce stringent conditions in the wild type or via overexpression of relA or spoT from pHERD20T through the addition of 1% l-arabinose to the culture medium. Induced cultures were left for 30 min at 37°C with shaking (250 rpm).

Bacteria were harvested in RNAprotect bacterial reagent (Qiagen) by centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 2 min). Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen) by following the manufacturer’s instructions. The obtained RNA was DNase treated (Ambion/Life Technologies) and subsequently quantified using a NanoDrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific), and RNA integrity determined by agarose gel electrophoresis.

For qRT-PCR experiments, high-quality RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified with a Roche LightCycler 96 instrument, in combination with the qScript one-step SYBR green qRT-PCR kit (QuantaBio), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Template RNA (5 ng/sample) was used in a standard 25-μl qRT-PCR with specific primers. Each sample was analyzed for gene expression in at least triplicate. Quantification of mRNA transcripts was performed by the comparative threshold cycle method (85) using the 16S gene as a normalizer.

For RNA-Seq experiments, rRNA was further depleted using the RiboZero bacterial kit (Illumina). Library preparation was done with the KAPA stranded total RNA kit (Kapa Biosystems), and sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq2500 instrument at the University of British Columbia’s Sequencing and Bioinformatics Consortium (generating single-end reads of 1× 100 bp). The read quality and alignment of sequencing samples were carried out as previously described (84). Briefly, FastQC v0.11.6 and MultiQC v1.6 were used for quality, STAR v2.6 for the alignment of transcriptomic reads to the PAO1 reference genome (obtained from the Pseudomonas Genome Database [58]), and read counts generated using HTSeq v0.11.2. Library sizes had a minimum of 1.2 million, median of 3.1 million, and maximum of 7.6 million uniquely mapped reads. Differentially expressed (DE) genes between the double mutant and wild type were determined using DESeq2 v1.24.0, with thresholds of adjusted P values of ≤0.05 and absolute fold change of ≥1.5.

Visualization of RNA-Seq data.

Relative expression of DE genes was plotted using the circular visualization software package CIRCOS (86). Since we found stretches of genes that were dysregulated in the same direction, we used an arbitrary cutoff of five consecutive genes to extract gene information for these regions. The rationale for using at least five genes in a row was that four genes almost revealed 100 clusters and six in a row also showed 34 clusters.

Regulatory elements and regulator enrichment.

Operon information for P. aeruginosa PAO1 was downloaded from DOOR2 (87) and gene annotations obtained from the Pseudomonas Genome Database (58). The following methodology was then applied to all 1,673 DE genes identified in the RNA-Seq experiment. The transcriptional start site (TSS) of each gene was obtained from Gill et al. (66). For any TSS type denoted as antisense, the strand for that gene was switched. In case there was no TSS available, the start codon as listed in the genome annotations was used. The list of 1,673 genes then was filtered to include the first gene from a given operon (or single genes for those not in an operon), yielding 1,201 genes. Once the starting location had been determined, the R package BSGenome v1.48.0 (88) was used to extract the 250-bp upstream region for each of the 1,201 genes. These sequences were then submitted to MEME (89) for identification of novel motifs with a significance threshold E value of ≤0.05. The program was set to find up to five motifs, while all other settings were left at their defaults. These five de novo motifs found by MEME were then submitted to TomTom (90) to identify potential matches to characterized motifs and their corresponding regulators within the CollecTF database (67). Matches identified by TomTom were considered significant with a q value of ≤0.5.

The list of all PAO1 regulators and their controlled genes (regulon) was downloaded from CollecTF (67) or recent Chip-Seq manuscripts as indicated in the text. This list of regulons was then tested for enrichment in the list of 1,673 DE genes using Fisher’s exact test, implemented via a custom script in R. Multiple test correction was performed using the Benjamin-Hochberg (BH) method. Significance of enrichment for each regulon was determined using a threshold of BH-corrected P values of ≤0.05.

Functional enrichment of DE genes.

Enrichment of GO terms was performed using GofuncR (Steffi Grote, 2018), testing the DE genes against a custom set of GO annotations downloaded from the Pseudomonas Genome Database (58). The full list of 1,673 DE genes was split into up- and downregulated genes, with GO enrichment being performed independently on each of these sets. Results were filtered using a significance threshold of family-wise error rate (FWER) of ≤0.1. Enrichment of KEGG pathways was done using Gage v2.3.0 (91) on the full list of 1,673 DE genes. Results were filtered for significance based on q value of ≤0.2.

Enrichment of cellular functions, based on manually curated lists from various sources (Data Set S2), was performed on the full list of 1,673 DE genes using Fisher’s exact test, implemented via a custom script in R. Multiple test correction was performed using the BH method and filtered on a significance of ≤0.05.

Growth curve experiments, pyoverdine production, and pyocyanin measurements.

PAO1 strains were grown overnight (16 to 18 h) in 2YT medium at 37°C with shaking (250 rpm). The overnight culture was resuspended in 2YT broth to an OD600 of 0.1, and then 200 μl was transferred to a flat-bottom 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate (Corning) and incubated at 37°C with continuous fast linear shaking at 567 cpm in a microplate reader (Synergy H1; BioTek). OD600 and fluorescence readings were taken every hour over a 24-h period, as previously described (84). Experiments were performed three times with at least three technical replicates.

Pyocyanin production of PAO1 and PAO1 ΔrelA ΔspoT strains was measured as previously described (84). Briefly, cells were grown in LB overnight and subsequently washed in SCFM broth, adjusted to an OD600 of 0.1, and further cultivated at 37°C with aeration (250 rpm) for 20 h, and pyocyanin was extracted from filter-sterilized supernatants. Experiments were performed three times with at least two technical replicates.

Swarming motility assays.

Swarming motility was examined on KB plates containing 0.4% agar. Strains were adjusted in KB medium to an OD600 of 0.1 and incubated for 24 h at 37°C as previously described (82). All experiments were performed at least three times.

Adherence experiments.

Adherence experiments were performed as previously described (84). Briefly, strains were streaked onto 2YT agar plates and grown overnight at 37°C. Bacteria were scraped from the plates and resuspended in 2YT medium to an OD600 of 0.5, and 100 μl was added into polystyrene microtiter plates (Falcon) and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Each well then was washed and adhered cells stained with crystal violet. Afterwards, plates were washed and crystal violet dissolved in 70% ethanol at room temperature, and absorbance was measured at 595 nm with a microplate reader (Synergy H1; BioTek). Data analysis was performed to calculate the mean and standard deviation after removal of outliers that were more than one standard deviation from the mean. Data were further normalized to the wild type. Experiments were performed at least three times with up to six technical replicates.

Ethics statement.

Animal experiments were performed in accordance with The Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) guidelines and were approved by the University of British Columbia Animal Care Committee (certificate number A14-0363).

Cutaneous mouse infection model.

Mice used in this study were female outbred CD-1. All animals were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA), were 7 weeks of age, and weighed about 25 ± 3 g at the time of the experiments. One to 3% isoflurane was used to anesthetize the mice. Mice were euthanized with carbon dioxide. The cutaneous mouse abscess infection model was performed as described earlier (92). Briefly, P. aeruginosa PAO1 and its alkaline protease AprA-deficient mutant were grown to an OD600 of 1.0 in 2YT broth, subsequently washed twice with sterile PBS, and further adjusted to 5 × 108 CFU/ml. A 50-μl bacterial suspension was injected into the right side of the dorsum. The progression of the infection was monitored daily and mice euthanized that reached the humane endpoint. Abscess lesion size (visible dermonecrosis) was measured on day three. Skin abscess tissues were excised (including all accumulated pus) and homogenized in 1 ml sterile PBS using a Mini-Beadbeater-96 (Biospec products) for 5 min, and bacterial counts were determined by serial dilution. Experiments were performed at least 2 times independently with 3 to 5 animals per group.

Data availability.

All fastq and count files are available under Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession number GSE147132. The full list of differentially expressed genes is included in Data Set S1.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

D.P. is supported by an Alexander von Humboldt–Feodor Lynen Postdoctoral Fellowship, a Cystic Fibrosis Canada Postdoctoral Fellowship, and a Research Trainee Award from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. R.E.W.H. is supported by Canadian Institutes from Health Research grant FDN-154287 and holds a Canada Research Chair and UBC Killam Professorship.

We thank Caleb Ritchie for his help with adherence- and motility-based experiments and Leo Liu for his help with measuring pyoverdine and pyocyanin production.

We have no competing interests to declare.

Footnotes

The review history of this article can be read here.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aertsen A, Michiels CW. 2004. Stress and how bacteria cope with death and survival. Crit Rev Microbiol 30:263–273. doi: 10.1080/10408410490884757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fossum S, Crooke E, Skarstad K. 2007. Organization of sister origins and replisomes during multifork DNA replication in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 26:4514–4522. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pletnev P, Osterman I, Sergiev P, Bogdanov A, Dontsova O. 2015. Survival guide: Escherichia coli in the stationary phase. Acta Naturae 7:22–33. doi: 10.32607/20758251-2015-7-4-22-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paget MS. 2015. Bacterial sigma factors and anti-sigma factors: structure, function and distribution. Biomolecules 5:1245–1265. doi: 10.3390/biom5031245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burgess RR, Travers AA, Dunn JJ, Bautz E. 1969. Factor stimulating transcription by RNA polymerase. Nature 221:43–46. doi: 10.1038/221043a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Atkinson GC, Tenson T, Hauryliuk V. 2011. The RelA/SpoT homolog (RSH) superfamily: distribution and functional evolution of ppGpp synthetases and hydrolases across the tree of life. PLoS One 6:e23479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hauryliuk V, Atkinson GC, Murakami KS, Tenson T, Gerdes K. 2015. Recent functional insights into the role of (p)ppGpp in bacterial physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:298–309. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wendrich TM, Blaha G, Wilson DN, Marahiel MA, Nierhaus KH. 2002. Dissection of the mechanism for the stringent factor RelA. Mol Cell 10:779–788. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00656-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Winther KS, Roghanian M, Gerdes K. 2018. Activation of the stringent response by loading of RelA-tRNA complexes at the ribosomal A-site. Mol Cell 70:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xiao H, Kalman M, Ikehara K, Zemel S, Glaser G, Cashel M. 1991. Residual guanosine 3’,5’-bispyrophosphate synthetic activity of Rela null mutants can be eliminated by Spot null mutations. J Biol Chem 266:5980–5990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abranches J, Martinez AR, Kajfasz JK, Chavez V, Garsin DA, Lemos JA. 2009. The molecular alarmone (p)ppGpp mediates stress responses, vancomycin tolerance, and virulence in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 191:2248–2256. doi: 10.1128/JB.01726-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pletzer D, Wolfmeier H, Bains M, Hancock R. 2017. Synthetic peptides to target stringent response-controlled virulence in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa murine cutaneous infection model. Front Microbiol 8:1867. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Geiger T, Kastle B, Gratani FL, Goerke C, Wolz C. 2014. Two small (p)ppGpp synthases in Staphylococcus aureus mediate tolerance against cell envelope stress conditions. J Bacteriol 196:894–902. doi: 10.1128/JB.01201-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yan X, Zhao C, Budin-Verneuil A, Hartke A, Rince A, Gilmore MS, Auffray Y, Pichereau V. 2009. The (p)ppGpp synthetase RelA contributes to stress adaptation and virulence in Enterococcus faecalis V583. Microbiology 155:3226–3237. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.026146-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Traxler MF, Summers SM, Nguyen HT, Zacharia VM, Hightower GA, Smith JT, Conway T. 2008. The global, ppGpp-mediated stringent response to amino acid starvation in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 68:1128–1148. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06229.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kriel A, Bittner AN, Kim SH, Liu K, Tehranchi AK, Zou WY, Rendon S, Chen R, Tu BP, Wang JD. 2012. Direct regulation of GTP homeostasis by (p)ppGpp: a critical component of viability and stress resistance. Mol Cell 48:231–241. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fernandez-Coll L, Maciag-Dorszynska M, Tailor K, Vadia S, Levin PA, Szalewska-Palasz A, Cashel M. 2020. The absence of (p)ppGpp renders initiation of Escherichia coli chromosomal DNA synthesis independent of growth rates. mBio 11:e03223-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03223-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Potrykus K, Murphy H, Philippe N, Cashel M. 2011. ppGpp is the major source of growth rate control in E. coli. Environ Microbiol 13:563–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02357.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ross W, Sanchez-Vazquez P, Chen AY, Lee JH, Burgos HL, Gourse RL. 2016. ppGpp binding to a site at the RNAP-DksA interface accounts for its dramatic effects on transcription initiation during the stringent response. Mol Cell 62:811–823. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.04.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Osterberg S, del Peso-Santos T, Shingler V. 2011. Regulation of alternative sigma factor use. Annu Rev Microbiol 65:37–55. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jishage M, Kvint K, Shingler V, Nystrom T. 2002. Regulation of sigma factor competition by the alarmone ppGpp. Genes Dev 16:1260–1270. doi: 10.1101/gad.227902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gourse RL, Ross W, Rutherford ST. 2006. General pathway for turning on promoters transcribed by RNA polymerases containing alternative sigma factors. J Bacteriol 188:4589–4591. doi: 10.1128/JB.00499-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sanchez-Vazquez P, Dewey CN, Kitten N, Ross W, Gourse RL. 2019. Genome-wide effects on Escherichia coli transcription from ppGpp binding to its two sites on RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:8310–8319. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1819682116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bosdriesz E, Molenaar D, Teusink B, Bruggeman FJ. 2015. How fast-growing bacteria robustly tune their ribosome concentration to approximate growth-rate maximization. FEBS J 282:2029–2044. doi: 10.1111/febs.13258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nakagawa A, Oshima T, Mori H. 2006. Identification and characterization of a second, inducible promoter of relA in Escherichia coli. Genes Genet Syst 81:299–310. doi: 10.1266/ggs.81.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sarubbi E, Rudd KE, Cashel M. 1988. Basal ppgpp level adjustment shown by new spot mutants affect steady-state growth-rates and ribosomal-RNA ribosomal promoter regulation in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet 213:214–222. doi: 10.1007/BF00339584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li WT, Bouveret E, Zhang Y, Liu KQ, Wang JD, Weisshaar JC. 2016. Effects of amino acid starvation on RelA diffusive behavior in live Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 99:571–585. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Loveland AB, Bah E, Madireddy R, Zhang Y, Brilot AF, Grigorieff N, Korostelev AA. 2016. Ribosome RelA structures reveal the mechanism of stringent response activation. Elife 5:e17029. doi: 10.7554/eLife.17029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Arenz S, Abdelshahid M, Sohmen D, Payoe R, Starosta AL, Berninghausen O, Hauryliuk V, Beckmann R, Wilson DN. 2016. The stringent factor RelA adopts an open conformation on the ribosome to stimulate ppGpp synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6471–6481. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bakshi S, Choi H, Weisshaar JC. 2015. The spatial biology of transcription and translation in rapidly growing Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol 6:636. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lewis PJ, Thaker SD, Errington J. 2000. Compartmentalization of transcription and translation in Bacillus subtilis. EMBO J 19:710–718. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.4.710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bakshi S, Siryaporn A, Goulian M, Weisshaar JC. 2012. Superresolution imaging of ribosomes and RNA polymerase in live Escherichia coli cells. Mol Microbiol 85:21–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08081.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.English BP, Hauryliuk V, Sanamrad A, Tankov S, Dekker NH, Elf J. 2011. Single-molecule investigations of the stringent response machinery in living bacterial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:365–373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102255108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Govindarajan S, Nevo-Dinur K, Amster-Choder O. 2012. Compartmentalization and spatiotemporal organization of macromolecules in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:1005–1022. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Laloux G, Jacobs-Wagner C. 2014. How do bacteria localize proteins to the cell pole? J Cell Sci 127:11–19. doi: 10.1242/jcs.138628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chatnaparat T, Li Z, Korban SS, Zhao YF. 2015. The stringent response mediated by (p)ppGpp is required for virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and its survival on tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 28:776–789. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-11-14-0378-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vogt SL, Green C, Stevens KM, Day B, Erickson DL, Woods DE, Storey DG. 2011. The stringent response is essential for Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in the rat lung agar bead and Drosophila melanogaster feeding models of infection. Infect Immun 79:4094–4104. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00193-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lesley JA, Shapiro L. 2008. SpoT regulates DnaA stability and initiation of DNA replication in carbon-starved Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol 190:6867–6880. doi: 10.1128/JB.00700-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gaca AO, Kajfasz JK, Miller JH, Liu KQ, Wang JD, Abranches J, Lemos JA. 2013. Basal levels of (p)ppGpp in Enterococcus faecalis: the magic beyond the stringent response. mBio 4:e00646-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00646-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cornelis GR. 2010. The type III secretion injectisome, a complex nanomachine for intracellular 'toxin' delivery. Biol Chem 391:745–751. doi: 10.1515/BC.2010.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Corbitt J, Yeo JS, Davis CI, LeRoux M, Wiggins PA. 2018. Type VI secretion system dynamics reveals a novel secretion mechanism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 200:e00744-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00744-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lesic B, Starkey M, He J, Hazan R, Rahme LG. 2009. Quorum sensing differentially regulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa type VI secretion locus I and homologous loci II and III, which are required for pathogenesis. Microbiology 155:2845–2855. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.029082-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lee J, Zhang L. 2015. The hierarchy quorum sensing network in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Protein Cell 6:26–41. doi: 10.1007/s13238-014-0100-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Venturi V. 2006. Regulation of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30:274–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2005.00012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.van Delden C, Comte R, Bally AM. 2001. Stringent response activates quorum sensing and modulates cell density-dependent gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 183:5376–5384. doi: 10.1128/jb.183.18.5376-5384.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Campodonico VL, Gadjeva M, Paradis-Bleau C, Uluer A, Pier GB. 2008. Airway epithelial control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Trends Mol Med 14:120–133. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bleves S, Soscia C, Nogueira-Orlandi P, Lazdunski A, Filloux A. 2005. Quorum sensing negatively controls type III secretion regulon expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol 187:3898–3902. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.11.3898-3902.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xu XH, Yu H, Zhang D, Xiong JZ, Qiu J, Xin R, He XM, Sheng HL, Cai WQ, Jiang L, Zhang KB, Hu XM. 2016. Role of ppGpp in Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute pulmonary infection and virulence regulation. Microbiol Res 192:84–95. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yeung AT, Torfs EC, Jamshidi F, Bains M, Wiegand I, Hancock REW, Overhage J. 2009. Swarming of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is controlled by a broad spectrum of transcriptional regulators, including MetR. J Bacteriol 191:5592–5602. doi: 10.1128/JB.00157-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Overhage J, Bains M, Brazas MD, Hancock R. 2008. Swarming of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a complex adaptation leading to increased production of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance. J Bacteriol 190:2671–2679. doi: 10.1128/JB.01659-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Giraud C, Bernard CS, Calderon V, Yang L, Filloux A, Molin S, Fichant G, Bordi C, de Bentzmann S. 2011. The PprA-PprB two-component system activates CupE, the first non-archetypal Pseudomonas aeruginosa chaperone-usher pathway system assembling fimbriae. Environ Microbiol 13:666–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bernard CS, Bordi C, Termine E, Filloux A, de Bentzmann S. 2009. Organization and PprB-dependent control of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa tad Locus, involved in Flp pilus biology. J Bacteriol 191:1961–1973. doi: 10.1128/JB.01330-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wei Q, Minh PNL, Dötsch A, Hildebrand F, Panmanee W, Elfarash A, Schulz S, Plaisance S, Charlier D, Hassett D, Häussler S, Cornelis P. 2012. Global regulation of gene expression by OxyR in an important human opportunistic pathogen. Nucleic Acids Res 40:4320–4333. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dotsch A, Eckweiler D, Schniederjans M, Zimmermann A, Jensen V, Scharfe M, Geffers R, Haussler S. 2012. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcriptome in planktonic cultures and static biofilms using RNA sequencing. PLoS One 7:e31092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Erickson DL, Lines JL, Pesci EC, Venturi V, Storey DG. 2004. Pseudomonas aeruginosa relA contributes to virulence in Drosophila melanogaster. Infect Immun 72:5638–5645. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.10.5638-5645.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bardoel BW, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA, Milder FJ. 2012. Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence: characterization of the AprA-AprI interface and species selectivity. J Mol Biol 415:573–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rawlings ND, Waller M, Barrett AJ, Bateman A. 2014. MEROPS: the database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D503–D509. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Winsor GL, Griffiths EJ, Lo R, Dhillon BK, Shay JA, Brinkman FS. 2016. Enhanced annotations and features for comparing thousands of Pseudomonas genomes in the Pseudomonas genome database. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D646–653. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Brencic A, Lory S. 2009. Determination of the regulon and identification of novel mRNA targets of Pseudomonas aeruginosa RsmA. Mol Microbiol 72:612–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06670.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Stacey SD, Williams DA, Pritchett CL. 2017. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa two-component regulator AlgR directly activates rsmA expression in a phosphorylation-independent manner. J Bacteriol 199:e00048-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00048-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Goodman AL, Kulasekara B, Rietsch A, Boyd D, Smith RS, Lory S. 2004. A signaling network reciprocally regulates genes associated with acute infection and chronic persistence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Dev Cell 7:745–754. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bowden SD, Eyres A, Chung JCS, Monson RE, Thompson A, Salmond GPC, Spring DR, Welch M. 2013. Virulence in Pectobacterium atrosepticum is regulated by a coincidence circuit involving quorum sensing and the stress alarmone, (p)ppGpp. Mol Microbiol 90:457–471. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bardoel BW, Hartsink D, Vughs MM, de Haas CJ, van Strijp JA, van Kessel KP. 2012. Identification of an immunomodulating metalloprotease of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IMPa). Cell Microbiol 14:902–913. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01765.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nouwens AS, Beatson SA, Whitchurch CB, Walsh BJ, Schweizer HP, Mattick JS, Cordwell SJ. 2003. Proteome analysis of extracellular proteins regulated by the las and rhl quorum sensing systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microbiology 149:1311–1322. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.25967-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hall BM, Breidenstein EBM, de la Fuente-Nunez C, Reffuveille F, Mawla GD, Hancock REW, Baker TA. 2017. Two isoforms of Clp peptidase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa control distinct aspects of cellular physiology. J Bacteriol 199:e00568-16. doi: 10.1128/JB.00568-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gill EE, Chan LS, Winsor GL, Dobson N, Lo R, Ho Sui SJ, Dhillon BK, Taylor PK, Shrestha R, Spencer C, Hancock REW, Unrau PJ, Brinkman F. 2018. High-throughput detection of RNA processing in bacteria. BMC Genomics 19:223. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4538-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kılıç S, Sagitova DM, Wolfish S, Bely B, Courtot M, Ciufo S, Tatusova T, O’Donovan C, Chibucos MC, Martin MJ, Erill I. 2016. From data repositories to submission portals: rethinking the role of domain-specific databases in CollecTF. Database 2016:baw055. doi: 10.1093/database/baw055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Krasny L, Gourse RL. 2004. An alternative strategy for bacterial ribosome synthesis: Bacillus subtilis rRNA transcription regulation. EMBO J 23:4473–4483. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jones CJ, Newsom D, Kelly B, Irie Y, Jennings LK, Xu BJ, Limoli DH, Harrison JJ, Parsek MR, White P, Wozniak DJ. 2014. ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq reveal an AmrZ-mediated mechanism for cyclic di-GMP synthesis and biofilm development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003984. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Muriel C, Arrebola E, Redondo-Nieto M, Martínez-Granero F, Jalvo B, Pfeilmeier S, Blanco-Romero E, Baena I, Malone JG, Rivilla R, Martín M. 2018. AmrZ is a major determinant of c-di-GMP levels in Pseudomonas fluorescens F113. Sci Rep 8:1979. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20419-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gilbert KB, Kim TH, Gupta R, Greenberg EP, Schuster M. 2009. Global position analysis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing transcription factor LasR. Mol Microbiol 73:1072–1085. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06832.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Khakimova M, Ahlgren HG, Harrison JJ, English AM, Nguyen D. 2013. The stringent response controls catalases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and is required for hydrogen peroxide and antibiotic tolerance. J Bacteriol 195:2011–2020. doi: 10.1128/JB.02061-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Storz G, Tartaglia LA, Ames BN. 1990. The OxyR regulon. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 58:157–161. doi: 10.1007/BF00548927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kong W, Zhao J, Kang H, Zhu M, Zhou T, Deng X, Liang H. 2015. ChIP-seq reveals the global regulator AlgR mediating cyclic di-GMP synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nucleic Acids Res 43:8268–8282. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dong T, Kirchhof MG, Schellhorn HE. 2008. RpoS regulation of gene expression during exponential growth of Escherichia coli K12. Mol Genet Genomics 279:267–277. doi: 10.1007/s00438-007-0311-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.de la Fuente-Nunez C, Reffuveille F, Haney EF, Straus SK, Hancock RE. 2014. Broad-spectrum anti-biofilm peptide that targets a cellular stress response. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004152. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pletzer D, Hancock R. 2018. Is synergy the key to treating high-density infections? Future Microbiol 13:1629–1632. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2018-0216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Overhage J, Lewenza S, Marr AK, Hancock R. 2007. Identification of genes involved in swarming motility using a Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 mini-Tn5-lux mutant library. J Bacteriol 189:2164–2169. doi: 10.1128/JB.01623-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zumaquero A, Macho AP, Rufian JS, Beuzon CR. 2010. Analysis of the role of the type III effector inventory of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola 1448a in interaction with the plant. J Bacteriol 192:4474–4488. doi: 10.1128/JB.00260-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pletzer D, Lafon C, Braun Y, Kohler T, Page MG, Mourez M, Weingart H. 2014. High-throughput screening of dipeptide utilization mediated by the ABC transporter DppBCDF and its substrate-binding proteins DppA1-A5 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS One 9:e111311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hoang TT, Karkhoff-Schweizer RR, Kutchma AJ, Schweizer HP. 1998. A broad-host-range Flp-FRT recombination system for site-specific excision of chromosomally-located DNA sequences: application for isolation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants. Gene 212:77–86. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(98)00130-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pletzer D, Braun Y, Weingart H. 2016. Swarming motility is modulated by expression of the putative xenosiderophore transporter SppR-SppABCD in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 109:737–753. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0675-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Baneyx F, Mujacic M. 2004. Recombinant protein folding and misfolding in Escherichia coli. Nat Biotechnol 22:1399–1408. doi: 10.1038/nbt1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Pletzer D, Sun E, Ritchie TC, Wilkinson L, Liu TL, Trimble JM, Wolfmeier H, Blimkie MT, Hancock R. 2020. Surfing motility is a complex adaptation that is different from swarming motility and requires the stringent stress response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa LESB58. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008444. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. 2008. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3:1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. 2009. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res 19:1639–1645. doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mao F, Dam P, Chou J, Olman V, Xu Y. 2009. DOOR: a database for prokaryotic operons. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D459–D463. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pagès H. 2018. BSgenome: software infrastructure for efficient representation of full genomes and their SNPs. R package version 1.48.0. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Bailey TL, Elkan C. 1994. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 2:28–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gupta S, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Bailey TL, Noble WS. 2007. Quantifying similarity between motifs. Genome Biol 8:R24. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Luo W, Friedman MS, Shedden K, Hankenson KD, Woolf PJ. 2009. GAGE: generally applicable gene set enrichment for pathway analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 10:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Pletzer D, Mansour SC, Wuerth K, Rahanjam N, Hancock R. 2017. New mouse model for chronic infections by Gram-negative bacteria enabling the study of anti-infective efficacy and host-microbe interactions. mBio 8:e00140-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00140-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

Genomic orientation of the ppGpp synthase relA (PA0934) in P. aeruginosa PAO1 and promoter activity in a PAO1 WT and an arginine auxotroph mutant. (A) The relA gene shown in an operon with the cysteine synthase (cysM, PA0932) and RNA methyltransferase (ygcA, PA0933) (thin arrow below genes). σ factor binding sites for RpoH (σ32; heat shock) and RpoS (σ38; stationary phase, starvation) are indicated by the dotted lines upstream of relA and cysM, respectively. (B and C) The cysM and relA promoter, respectively, was fused to the mCherry reporter gene and grown over a period of 16 h in BM2 broth in a 96-well plate with continuous shaking (567 cpm) with 6.5 and 12.5 μM arginine in PAO1 wild type (left) and PAO1 ΔargB mutant (right). Measurements were taken every hour at the OD600 for absorbance (B) and red fluorescence (mCherry expression) at excitation of 580 nm and emission of 610 nm (C). The first significant time point of the signal over time point 1 is indicated for the relA-mCherry (*) and cysM-mCherry (+). The occurrence of the first significant difference between the two constructs is indicated with a number symbol. (D and E) The cysM-relA promoters were fused to the mCherry reporter gene and grown over a period of 16 h in BM2 broth in a 96-well plate with continuous shaking (567 cpm) with 6.5 and 12.5 μM arginine in PAO1 (left) and PAO1 ΔargB mutant (right). Measurements were taken every hour at the OD600 for absorbance (D) and red fluorescence (mCherry expression) at excitation of 580 nm and emission of 610 nm (E). (B to E) The values are the means from three biological and six technical replicates; error bars represent the standard errors of the means. Comparisons were analyzed with a two-tailed Student’s t test and significant differences indicated at P < 0.05. Download FIG S1, EPS file, 0.4 MB (423.2KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Promoter activity of an rpoZ-spoT transcriptional fusion to GFP in a PAO1 WT. The rpoZ-spoT promoter fused to GFP measured at the OD600 for absorbance (left) and green fluorescence (right) at excitation of 488 nm and emission of 509 nm. The values are the means from three biological and six technical replicates grown in BM2 medium; error bars represent the standard errors of the means. Download FIG S2, EPS file, .04 MB (400.8KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Deletion of relA and spoT had no obvious impact on growth in three different media. (A) King’s B (KB). (B) Double yeast tryptone (2YT). (C) Synthetic cystic fibrosis medium (SCFM). A minor effect was observed in the rate of death during stationary phase only in SCFM minimal medium, whereby the PAO1 ΔrelA ΔspoT strain died at a lower rate, which could be complemented by introduction of the relA gene. (A to C) Bacterial growth in a 96-well plate with continuous shaking (567 cpm) for 16 h at 37°C. OD600 absorbance was measured every hour. Download FIG S3, EPS file, 0.1 MB (66.1KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Scatter plot of the correlation between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR expression for genes around the threshold cutoff (fold change of ±1.5). Verification of RNA-Seq data was performed on the same RNA for the following 15 genes: PA0652, PA0675, PA0762, PA0893, PA1270, PA1282, PA1430, PA2237, PA2426, PA3385, PA3410, PA3462, PA3899, PA5261, and PA5344. Download FIG S4, EPS file, 0.2 MB (188.8KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DATA SET S1

Differentially expressed gene set. Download Data Set S1, XLSX file, 0.6 MB (616.6KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DATA SET S2

Cluster overview and curated PAO1 lists. Download Data Set S2, XSLX file, 0.6 MB (162.2KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S5

Phenotypic confirmations of the P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild type, the stringent response mutant, and complements. (A) Swarming on KB agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. (B) Rhamnolipid production (yellow arrows indicate ring formation) at 37°C for 48 h. (C) Adherence to 96-well polypropylene plates in 2YT, KB, and SCFM medium at room temperature for 1 h. Data normalized to wild-type adherence. (D) Pyoverdine production normalized to wild-type production. (E) Pyocyanin production. (C to E) Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple-comparison test; P values were <0.05 (*) and 0.01 (**) compared to the wild type. Experiments were performed at least three times. Error bars indicate ± standard errors. Download FIG S5, EPS file, 1.5 MB (1.5MB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S6

Manually curated list analysis of the differential expressed genes between the P. aeruginosa PAO1 ΔrelA ΔspoT stringent stress response mutant and wild-type strains. Gene ratio and set size for a number of curated gene lists from various sources (see Data Set S2) were calculated using Fisher’s exact test with multiple test correction (Benjamin-Hochberg method). Significant results were determined using an adjusted P value threshold of 0.05. Gene ratio represents the proportion of total genes assigned to a term that are differentially expressed. Download FIG S6, EPS file, 0.4 MB (396.1KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and PCR primers used in this study. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (22.4KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S7

Verification of functional RelA-YFP and SpoT-GFP in the PAO1 ΔrelA ΔspoT stringent stress response mutant. Shown is swarming on BM2 agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Representative images of the swarming-deficient stringent stress response mutant (left) and the complementation with RelA-YFP (middle) or SpoT-GFP (right) are shown. Experiments were repeated three times. Download FIG S7, EPS file, 0.8 MB (881.3KB, eps) .

Copyright © 2020 Pletzer et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Reviewer comments

Data Availability Statement

All fastq and count files are available under Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession number GSE147132. The full list of differentially expressed genes is included in Data Set S1.


Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES