Abstract
Abnormal subretinal neovascularization is a characteristic of vision-threatening retinal diseases, including macular telangiectasia (MacTel) and retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). Subretinal neovascular tufts and photoreceptor dysfunction are observed in very-low-density lipoprotein receptor (Vldlr–/–) mutant mice. These changes mirror those observed in patients with MacTel and RAP, but the pathogenesis is largely unknown. In this study, we show that retinal microglia were closely associated with retinal neovascular tufts in Vldlr–/– mice and retinal tissue from patients with MacTel; ablation of microglia/macrophages dramatically prevented formation of retinal neovascular tufts and improved neuronal function, as assessed by electroretinography. Vldlr–/– mice with retinal pigmented epithelium–specific (RPE-specific) Vegfa had greatly reduced subretinal infiltration of microglia/macrophages, subsequently reducing neovascular tufts. These findings highlight the contribution of microglia/macrophages to the pathogenesis of neovascularization, provide valuable clues regarding potential causative cellular mechanisms for subretinal neovascularization in patients with MacTel and RAP and suggest that targeting microglia activation may be a therapeutic option in these diseases.
Keywords: Angiogenesis, Ophthalmology
Keywords: Retinopathy
Pharmacological and genetic microglia ablation in retina inhibit formation of abnormal subretinal neovascular tufts improving visual function in a mouse model of subretinal neovascularization.
Introduction
Pathological angiogenesis in the eye is a characteristic of the vast majority of diseases resulting in irreversible vision loss (1). Retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) (a subform of neovascular age-related macular degeneration [AMD]) and macular telangiectasia (MacTel) are both characterized by abnormal retinal neovascularization (NV), which leads to loss of central vision (2, 3). Unlike most forms of AMD, the vascular changes in patients with MacTel and RAP originate in the intraretinal vasculature, rather than the choroid, and invade the normally avascular layer of photoreceptor cells, eventually developing choroidal NV and retinal-choroidal anastomoses (4, 5). The underlying molecular causes of the subretinal NV in these diseases are incompletely understood and may vary between diseases. Currently, the most commonly used therapies are aimed at reducing the activity of VEGF in order to reduce retinal NV. While effective for treating NV AMD and diabetic macular edema, there are issues with anti-VEGF–based therapies, because they are effective only in a subset of patients, elicit off-target effects by blocking VEGF activity (6, 7), and can exacerbate photoreceptor dysfunction by inhibiting the neurotrophic effect of VEGF (8–10). In addition, anti-VEGF therapy is ineffective in the treatment of patients with MacTel and, in fact, may be detrimental (11, 12). For patients with RAP, anti-VEGF therapies have short-term benefit, but they are not efficacious in the long term (13). Therefore, alternative treatment options are necessary, but these are dependent on better understanding of underlying cellular mechanisms driving the pathological NV.
The very-low-density lipoprotein receptor (Vldlr) mutant (Vldlr–/–) mouse represents a murine model of subretinal NV that is commonly used to model the vascular features of MacTel and RAP. Subretinal NV in Vldlr–/– mice originates from the intraretinal vasculature, and electroretinography (ERG) analyses reveal photoreceptor impairments, which are particularly striking in cones (14, 15). The mechanisms that initiate and direct normal blood vessels to the outer nuclear layer (ONL) are not fully understood. Using immunohistochemistry, we detected microglia/macrophages in areas where subretinal NV tufts subsequently form in Vldlr–/– mice, just before formation of subretinal NV and colocalized to NV at stages associated with maintenance of subretinal NV. In addition, we detected cells expressing microglial/macrophage markers near NV sites of patients with MacTel. These findings may be significant, because both macrophages and microglia are well recognized to play roles in physiological and pathological retinal angiogenesis (16). Using genetic and pharmacologic approaches, we observed significantly fewer NV tufts in the Vldlr–/– mouse and significantly improved ERG recordings when macrophages and microglia were depleted. In contrast, specific VEGF knockout in retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) resulted in reduced subretinal localization of microglia and prevented subretinal NV tuft formation. These data further demonstrate the key role of microglia activation in driving formation of subretinal NV in the Vldlr–/– mouse model. These insights may provide valuable clues regarding the pathogenesis of diseases with subretinal NV and inform further potential targets for therapeutic intervention in these degenerative eye diseases.
Results
Retinal microglia are associated with retinal NV tufts in Vldlr–/– mice.
To investigate the relationship between subretinal NV tufts in Vldlr–/– mice and retinal microglia/macrophages, we generated Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice (17). Cx3cr1GFP/+-knockin transgenic mice show GFP expression in myeloid cells, including monocytes, dendritic cells, macrophages, and microglia (17). In healthy retina, microglia are known to localize near the vasculature in the inner plexiform layer (IPL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), and ganglion cell layers (GCLs) (18). Neither GFP-positive cells nor GS-lectin–positive vessels were observed in the ONL and subretinal space of Cx3cr1GFP/+ and Vldlr-/+; Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice (Figure 1A and data not shown). However, GFP-positive microglia/macrophages were detected in P27 Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice, especially in close proximity to the invasive NV vessels and subretinal NV tufts in the outer retinas (Figure 1A). Microglia in ONL and subretinal spaces were round shaped and had short processes, which is characteristic of activated microglia compared with microglia on retinal surfaces (Figure 1A). We also confirmed pathological neovessels and GFP-positive microglia in vivo using deep focus confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy images. It was found that GFP-positive cells aggregated around the area of the pathological neovessels visualized by indocyanine green angiography (ICG) at P40 in Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice (Figure 1B). NV can be observed in patients with MacTel; these subretinal vessels originate from the retinal vasculature, forming retinal-choroidal anastomosis, similar to that seen in Vldlr–/– mice (5). In macular specimens from patients with MacTel type 2, microglia positive for IBA1 (a microglia/macrophage-specific calcium-binding protein) were also found around the abnormal blood vessels within the subretinal space (Figure 1C), suggesting that microglia association with subretinal NV occurs in human disease as well as in the Vldlr–/– mouse model.
We next set out to investigate the role of microglia during progression of the phenotype in Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice. In the Vldlr–/– retina, NV starts developing from the retinal vessels, extending into the normally avascular ONL containing the photoreceptor cell bodies by P12, and reaching the RPE and forming subretinal NV by P16 (19). To confirm the roles of retinal microglia in the initiation of NV, we investigated the localization of retinal microglia in Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice at earlier time points. At P6, neither vessels nor microglia were observed in the ONL and subretinal space. In P10 Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+mice, before subretinal NV, GFP-positive microglia are observed migrating from OPL into the ONL; this area is normally devoid of microglia. At P13, GFP-positive microglia had migrated into the subretinal space, just ahead of the newly forming neovessels (Figure 1D). The fact that microglia migrate into the ONL and subretinal space before subretinal NV itself suggests that these cells may be promoting subretinal NV rather than reacting to its presence. GFP-positive microglia/macrophages were also observed in RPE of flat-mounted retinas at P14 (Figure 1E), with prominent numbers of GFP-positive microglia/macrophages recruited to the photoreceptor/RPE boundary coalescing around the invading NV tufts at later stages (Figure 1E). Many of these GFP-positive cells localized around subretinal neovessels expressed activated microglia marker CD68 (Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.137317DS1).
To investigate the molecular basis for the NV in Vldlr–/– mice, we compared gene expression analyses of 84 different angiogenesis-related genes in retinas from Vldlr–/– mice and control Vldlr-/+ littermate mice at P12, just before formation of subretinal NV. The highest changes in mRNA expression between Vldlr–/– and heterozygous controls occurred in chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (Ccl2), which was increased 4-fold in the Vldlr–/– retinas (Figure 1F). Ccl2 is primarily secreted by activated microglia to recruit inflammatory monocytes expressing Ccr2 (20, 21).
Taken together, the migration of microglia into the ONL, preceding formation of the subretinal vessels, followed by subsequent colocalization with subretinal NV, suggests that microglia play an important role for the formation and maintenance of these pathological vessels.
Chemically induced microglial ablation reduces retinal NV tufts in Vldlr–/– mice.
To further analyze the contribution of microglia to the formation of the pathological NV tufts within the ONL and subretinal space, we used an inhibitor of colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R). CSF-1R, also known as macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (M-CSF-R), is crucial for the viability of microglia, and when CSF-1R is genetically knocked out or pharmacologically inhibited, brain and retina microglia are largely depleted (22–25). Previously, Kubota et al. reported that postnatal systemic injection of CSF-1R inhibitor (Ki20227) from P1 to P4 significantly decreased retinal microglia/macrophages at P4 in mice (24). Daily systemic injections of Ki20227 (24) from P10 to P16 in Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice, the time when microglia were found to migrate into the ONL and NV tufts begin subsequent formation, resulted in depletion of GFP-positive retinal microglia/macrophages at P17 (Figure 2, A and B). Strikingly, formation of NV tufts in the Vldlr–/– retina was highly suppressed by Ki20227-induced microglia ablation, suggesting that these GFP-positive microglia/macrophage play a critical role in the development of the NV phenotype in Vldlr–/– retinas (Figure 2, A–C).
Next, we further tested whether the presence of microglia is critical to the formation of outer retinal/subretinal NV in Vldlr–/– mice by genetic ablation of retinal microglia using cell lineage–specific diphtheria toxin–induced (DT-induced) toxicity. Cx3cr1Cre-ERT; Rosa26iDTR/+; Vldlr–/– mice were crossed with Cx3cr1Cre-ERT; Vldlr–/–mice and a mouse strain harboring a transgene encoding the human DT receptor (iDTR) within the ROSA26 locus (R26iDTR). This resulted in mice with Cx3cr1-expressing cells (microglia and macrophages) that expressed the iDTR and were therefore susceptible to DT cell death. Administration of DT intraperitoneally from P12 to P14, after subcutaneous injection of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) at P10 and P11 to induce Cx3cr1-Cre selectively ablated retinal microglial/macrophages in Cx3cr1Cre-ERT; Rosa26iDTR/+; Vldlr–/– and Rosa26iDTR/+; Vldlr–/– mice, and we evaluated NV tufts 9 days later at P23. The numbers of subretinal tufts were significantly reduced in retinas where microglia were genetically ablated compared with controls (Figure 2, D and E). Collectively, chemically or genetically induced retinal microglia/macrophage ablation strongly prevents formation of NV tufts in Vldlr–/– mice.
Microglia activation increases retinal NV tufts in Vldlr–/– mice.
LPS is a component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, and systemic LPS injection leads to increased retinal microglia activation (26). Intraperitoneal LPS injection of Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice at P4, before observed microglia migration and subsequent subretinal NV, resulted in a significant increase in the number of subretinal tufts at P23 as compared with that in Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice injected with PBS control (Figure 3, A and C). In LPS-treated Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+ retinas, many GFP-positive cells were observed localized to NV tufts compared with those in controls (Figure 3B). However, administration of LPS to Vldlr–/–; Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice at P28, the time when most NV tufts have already formed, did not result in a significant increase in the number of NV tufts 2 weeks later (Figure 3, A and D). These results suggest that the existence and activation of microglia play an important role in the formation of retinal NV in Vldlr–/– mice.
Microglia/macrophage ablation rescues cone photoreceptor function in Vldlr–/– mice.
Having found that microglia are critical for initiation of NV tufts, we next tested whether microglia ablation at later stages not only results in reduction of the NV tuft formation in Vldlr–/– mice, but also rescues retinal function. Injection of Ki20227 from P10 to P24 resulted in almost complete elimination of NV tufts in Vldlr–/– mice at P25, similar to the P10–P16 injections previously discussed (Figure 4, A–C, and Figure 2, A and C). Injection of Ki20227 from P17–P24, starting after subretinal NV, resulted in a 80% reduction of subretinal NV tufts at P25 (Figure 4, A–C). Moreover, when analyzed at P45, NV tufts were still significantly inhibited, despite the fact that the injections were halted 3 weeks earlier (Figure 4, A–C), although total reduction was now only 50% compared with 80%, suggesting that some NV occurred after injections were stopped. Furthermore, we analyzed retinal function using ERGs to confirm whether reduction of NV tufts by microglia ablation rescues subsequent photoreceptor function defects. Cone photoreceptor dysfunction/death is also characteristic of Vldlr–/– mice and likely occurs secondary to vascular changes (15). ERGs of Vldlr–/– mice analyzed at P45 after injection with Ki20227 from P17–P24 and controls analyzed at P45 (Figure 4A) demonstrated rescue of cone photoreceptor function, as assessed by photopic flash and photopic flicker ERGs (Figure 4, D and E). These data demonstrate that retinal function is negatively correlated to subretinal NV tufts and that preventing subretinal NV tufts via microglia ablation can potentially rescue both the pathological vascular phenotype and visual function in Vldlr–/– mice.
VEGF from RPE, but not microglia, regulates microglia activation and tuft formation.
We (15), and others (19, 27), have reported that Vegfa expression is increased in Vldlr–/– retinas at an early stage. We set out to determine whether microglia-derived Vegfa contributed to the NV phenotype. We genetically ablated floxed Vegfa alleles in retinal microglia and macrophages by crossing Cx3cr1Cre-ERT or LysMCre with Vldlr–/– mice. LysM is myelomonocytic cell–specific (macrophage, monocyte, and granulocyte) gene; it is known to be expressed in some populations of retinal microglia during development (28, 29). On the other hand, Cx3cr1 is mainly expressed in microglia and also expressed in perivascular macrophages, which are sparse in the retina (30, 31). We observed no significant differences in the number of NV tufts between LysMCre; Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/– or Cx3cr1Cre-ERT; Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/– mice and controls (Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/–) at P23 (Figure 5, A and B), suggesting that microglia-derived Vegfa was not required for the formation of retinal NV tufts in Vldlr–/– mice. In fact, ISH analysis of Vegfa and Itgam (CD11b) expression demonstrated that high levels of Vegfa expression were observed in areas of the ONL where NV was prominent but not necessarily correlated with microglia/macrophages (Supplemental Figure 2). This also suggests that other cell types within the subretinal space, besides microglia, are likely to be responsible for substantial VEGF expression. Previous studies have also demonstrated high levels of VEGF expression in the ONL and RPE of Vldlr–/– mice (15, 19, 32).
To determine whether Vegfa expression in RPE is critical for microglia activation and NV formation, we generated RPE-specific Vegfa-deleted Vldlr–/– mice. In P14 Vldlr–/– mice deficient in RPE-derived Vegfa (VMD2Cre; Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/–), in which Cre-recombinase was induced at P10, neither NV tufts nor microglia within the ONL were observed, while P14 control mice (Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/–) showed microglia migration into ONL with the formation of NV tufts from deep retinal vessel. P23 VMD2Cre; Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/– mice also had reduced formation of subretinal NV tufts as well as reduced migration of microglia/macrophages compared with control Vldlr–/– mice (Figure 5, C and D), which had substantial subretinal NV tufts with massive microglia/macrophages infiltrates, as expected (Figure 5, C and D). The percentage of IBA1-positive area in the retina was significantly reduced in VMD2Cre; Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/– mice compared with that in Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/– mice (Supplemental Figure 3). The expression of microglia-related inflammatory genes, such as Ccl2, Il1b, Il6, and Tnfa, was significantly suppressed in retinas from RPE-specific Vegfa-deleted Vldlr–/– mice compared with that in controls (Figure 5E). The number of subretinal NV tufts at a later stage, P56, after doxycycline treatment at P21 was also significantly reduced in RPE-specific Vegfa deleted Vldlr–/– mice (Figure 5, F and G) While blocking RPE-mediated VEGF expression blocked microglia migration and subsequent subretinal NV, it also resulted in reduced ERG photopic function (Figure 5, H and I). This result was somewhat surprising given our earlier observation that reducing NV rescues the retinal phenotype; it may suggest that the natural upregulation of VEGF in the RPE of Vldlr–/– mice is critical for maintenance of the retinal photoreceptors. Taken together, we suggest that Vegfa expression in RPE cells play a key role in microglia/macrophage migration or activation and subsequent subretinal NV formation in Vldlr–/– mice. However, Vegfa deletion in RPE can induce impairment of retinal function, further indicating that caution may be warranted when treating retinal diseases with subretinal NV using VEGF inhibition.
Discussion
We have demonstrated that ectopically distributed microglia were observed in the normally avascular photoreceptor layer, before the formation of subretinal NV tufts. Moreover, microglia ablation at early stages, before NV tufts emerged, by either chemical or genetic methods significantly inhibited the subretinal NV tuft formation in Vldlr–/– mice. We have also demonstrated that treatment at later time points, after establishment of subretinal NV tufts, was sufficient to reduce NV and restore visual function. On the contrary, LPS-induced microglia activation increased the number of subretinal NV tufts. Taken together, these data demonstrate a critical role for retinal microglia/macrophages in the pathogenic phenotype of Vldlr–/– mice. We have also demonstrated that the maculae of patients with MacTel Type2 exhibited a similar association between neovessels and microglia/macrophage as observed in Vldlr–/– mice, suggesting that these findings are likely to correlate with human disease as well. It was also reported that retinal microglia accumulated in affected zones of the maculae of patients with AMD and located in close physical contact with choroidal NV (33). Collectively, these findings suggest that microglia associated with subretinal NV occurs in various human retinal diseases as well. We know earlier treatments with LPS (at P4) and Ki20227 (at P10) show maximum effects on the number of NV tufts compared with later treatment, and LPS treatment at P28 did not exacerbate the number of NV tufts. This implies that activated microglia are critical for sprouting of the NV tufts from deep retinal vasculature, which occurs in early stages of Vldlr–/– mice.
We found that Ccl2 expression was highly upregulated in the Vldlr–/– mouse retina at P12 before subretinal NV formation. Ccl2 is primarily secreted by activated microglia to recruit inflammatory monocytes expressing Ccr2, and the expression level of Ccl2 in retinas is strongly enhanced in retinal NV diseases such as AMD or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (20, 21, 34). Furthermore, Ccl2 has also been shown to directly induce NV (35, 36) in retinas. The induction of Ccl2 in Vldlr–/– mice again implicates microglia in the associated pathological phenotype. This was further corroborated by the fact that inhibition of CSF-1R, also key to microglia/macrophage recruitment, resulted in a dramatic reduction in NV tuft formation.
The simplest explanation for why microglia/macrophage ablation improves retinal function is prevention of microglia depletion. Additionally, inactivation by CSF-1R inhibition could prevent photoreceptor degeneration, which may normally occur through the release of neurotoxic compounds during phagocytosis of cell debris and aggregated proteins.
It is known that microglia and macrophages have important roles in both physiological and pathological angiogenesis in various CNS diseases, such as brain tumor, ischemic stroke, and neurodegenerative diseases. Microglia/macrophages promote NV via secretion of Ccl2, Tnfa, Il1b, Vegfa, or MMPs (35, 41, 42). We have demonstrated that Vegfa deletion in microglia/macrophages did not rescue the NV phenotype of Vldlr–/– mice, suggesting that microglia promote NV tuft formation by secreting other non-Vegfa factors, such as Ccl2, Tnfa, Il1b, or MMPs, which can also induce NV. However, as expected, Vegfa is still a key driver of the subretinal NV phenotype. We detected that Vegfa is strongly enriched in the outer retinas of Vldlr–/– mice, as observed by ISH, compared with expression that is mainly limited to the INL during development of normal retinas (43). This correlates well with previous studies that demonstrated high levels of VEGF expression in the ONL and RPE of Vldlr–/– mice (15, 19, 32). Indeed, Vegfa deletion in the RPE of Vldlr–/– mice significantly blocked subretinal NV formations by eliminating microglia migration into the subretinal space and reducing microglia-related inflammatory and angiogenic genes, such as Ccl2, Tnfa, or Il1b. Previously, Joyal et al. have reported impaired uptake of both glucose and lipids into photoreceptors of Vldlr–/– mice, leading to a shortage of the Krebs cycle intermediate α-ketoglutarate, which subsequently promotes stabilization of hypoxia-induced factor 1a and secretion of Vegfa (44). Sun et al. showed that VEGF upregulation by c-fos in the Vldlr–/– photoreceptor controls retinal NV growth into the normally avascular photoreceptor layer (19). We have shown that Vegfa deletion from RPE significantly suppressed microglia/macrophage migration and activation in Vldlr–/– mice. Upregulated Vegfa induction of microglia/macrophage migration and activation leads to subsequent abnormal NV. In fact, it has been reported that microglia/macrophages express Vegfr1 and Vegfa serves as a chemoattractant for microglia, inducing their subsequent migration, activation, and participate in the angiogenic response (45, 46). Collectively, we suggest that Vegfa upregulation in photoreceptors or RPE induce microglial activation or migration, after which Ccl2 is secreted by activated microglia leading to the recruitment of more microglia/macrophages. This process ultimately promotes retinal neovessel growth into the normally avascular outer retina in Vldlr–/– mice. Although Vegfa deletion in RPE in Vldlr–/– mice inhibited retinal NV tufts significantly, cone photoreceptor function in these mice was even worse than in Vldlr–/– mice, consistent with previous reports that endogenous Vegfa provides critical trophic support necessary for retinal function (10). Thus, we suggest that targeting only Vegfa is neither an effective nor a safe strategy for treating vascular diseases of the macula, such as MacTel, and that regulating microglia/macrophage may represent a more effective and safer strategy for preventing subretinal NV.
As Cx3cr1 does not distinguish retinal resident microglia from circulating monocyte-derived macrophages, we can not further delineate the roles of macrophages or microglia in this study.
Understanding the role of microglia in Vldlr–/– mice may help provide clues for how subretinal NV occurs in patients. Microglia closely associate with NV tufts in patients with MacTel in a manner reminiscent of Vldlr–/– mice. Thus, learning how to therapeutically modulate microglia activity in the CNS may provide broad benefits in treating multiple CNS disorders.
Methods
Animals.
Vldlr–/– mice (15) were crossed with Cx3cr1GFP/GFP-knockin transgenic mice (17) (The Jackson Laboratory) expressing GFP under the control of the chemokine (C-X3-C motif) receptor 1 (Cx3cr1) promoter, which drives expression in microglia/macrophages (17) to generate Vldlr–/–, Cx3cr1GFP/+mice, with GFP expression in retinal macrophages/microglia within the Vldlr–/– background. Cx3cr1Cre-ERT (47) mice (The Jackson Laboratory) expressing tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase or M-lysozyme (LysM) locus (LysMCre) (48) were mated with Vldlr–/–, Vegfafl/fl (49), or Rosa26iDTR/+ (50) mice (The Jackson Laboratory) to generate conditional gene knockout mice and permit macrophage and microglia ablation (Cx3cr1Cre-ERT, Vegfafl/fl, Vldlr–/–; microglia-specific Vegfa deletion in Vldlr–/– mice, LysMCre, Vegfafl/fl, Vldlr–/–; myeloid lineage cell–specific Vegfa deletion in Vldlr–/– mice, Cx3cr1Cre-ERT, Rosa26iDTR/+; Vldl–/–; genetical microglia depletion in Vldlr–/– mice). To induce Cx3cr1-Cre recombination, 0.1 mg/g body weight of 4-OHT (MilliporeSigma)/cone oil solution was administered to Cx3cr1Cre-ERT; Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/–, and control littermates (Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/–) subcutaneously once a day from P12 to P14. For Cx3cr1Cre-ERT; Rosa26iDTR/+; Vldlr–/– mice, 0.1 mg/g body weight of 4-OHT was injected subcutaneously at P10 and P11 and 20 ng/g body weight of DT (MilliporeSigma) was injected intraperitoneally from P12 to P14. They were analyzed at P23. Transgenic mice carrying the human vitelliform macular dystrophy-2 (VMD2) promoter–directed reverse tetracycline-dependent transactivator and the tetracycline-responsive element–directed (TRE-directed) Cre recombinase (VMD2Cre) (51) were mated with Vldlr–/–, Vegfafl/fl mice (49) (VMD2Cre Vegfafl/fl; Vldlr–/–; retinal RPE–specific Vegfa deletion in Vldlr–/– mice). To induce gene deletion, 80 mg/g body weight of doxycycline (MilliporeSigma) was injected daily intraperitoneally for consecutive 3 days and then analyzed by immunohistochemistry or ERG at varying time points, as indicated in the Results and the legend for Figure 5. Littermates harboring floxed alleles but no Cre-recombinase were used as control. To deplete microglia/macrophages, the CSF-1R inhibitor (Ki20227) (R&D Systems) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and 50 mg/kg Ki20227 or vehicle control (DMSO) was injected intraperitoneally on a daily basis as previously described (24). To activate microglia/macrophages, 1 mg/kg of LPS (MilliporeSigma) or control vehicle (PBS) was injected intraperitoneally into Vldlr–/– mice at P4 or P28.
Human samples.
The donor eye from a patient with MacTel type 2 (52-year-old female) was obtained as previously described (52). The time between death and fixation of the MacTel eye in 4% paraformaldehyde was just over 4 hours. The fixed retina was dehydrated and sectioned from paraffin wax, and immunohistochemistry was performed.
Immunofluorescence.
Retinas or RPE/choroid complexes were dissected and prepared for whole mounts or sectioning. For preparation of retinal cross-sections, isolated eyes were fixed in 4% PFA for 4 hours, placed in 20% sucrose for 4 hours at 4°C, and embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetek) for subsequent cryosectioning. For preparation of whole mounts, after fixation in 4% PFA for 1 hour, retinas or RPE/choroid complexes were dissected and laid flat with 4 radial relaxing incisions. Whole-mount retinas, RPE/choroid complexes, or cryosections were incubated in blocking buffer (PBS with 10% fetal bovine serum, 10% normal goat serum, and 0.1% Triton X-100) for 2 hours at 4°C, following by an overnight incubation with primary antibodies in blocking buffer at 4°C. Tissue specimens were then washed and incubated with the corresponding Alexa Fluor–conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher) for 3 hours, and nuclei were stained with DAPI (Vector Laboratories). After staining, they were washed and mounted in ProLong Diamond Antifade mounting medium (Thermo Fisher). Retinal whole mounts were mounted with the photoreceptor side down. Primary antibodies targeting ZO-1 (33-9100/ZO1-1A12, Thermo Fisher), CD68 (MCA-1957/FA-11, Bio-Rad), Collagen Type 4 (AB769, Millipore Sigma), and Iba-1 (019-19741, Wako) were used. Fluorescent-conjugated isolectin Griffonia Simplicifolia IB-4 (GS-Lectin) (I21412, Thermo Fisher) was also used for labeling endothelial cells. All images were acquired with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 710, Zeiss) and processed with the ZEN 2010 software (Zeiss). Three-dimensional reconstructions were generated using ZEN 2010 and Imaris software (Bitplane). The quantification of GFP-positive pixels and the number of NV tufts was performed by NIH ImageJ software.
Gene expression analyses.
For quantitative PCR, single retinas were collected in 500 μl Trizol, and RNA was isolated using a Purelink RNA mini kit (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 700 ng RNA was used for RT-qPCR using the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Thermo Fisher). qPCR was performed using TaqMan universal master mix (Thermo Fisher) and TaqMan probes on a Quantstudio 5 (Thermo Fisher). β-Actin was used as the reference gene. For PCR array, total RNA was prepared from P12 Vldlr–/–and Vldlr-/+ retinas using the RNeasy Plus Mini kit (QIAGEN) and was reverse transcribed using the RT2 First Strand cDNA Kit (QIAGEN). mRNA PCR array for angiogenesis (RT2 Profiler PCR Array for Mouse Angiogenesis [PAMM-024]) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN). Data were analyzed with 7900 HT Fast System SDS 2.4 Software (Thermo Fisher).
In vivo imaging.
Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy detecting fundus autofluorescence by infrared reflectance and ICG were performed using a Spectralis imaging platform (Heidelberg Engineering). Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine and perfused with indocyanine green (50 μg/g body weight). Pupils were dilated with 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine before imaging.
Ganzfeld ERGs.
The phenotypes of the mice were characterized using Ganzfeld ERGs and immunohistochemistry as previously described (43, 52). Mice were dark-adapted overnight before the experiments and anesthetized under a dim red light by intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine. Silver needle electrodes served as reference (forehead) and ground (tail). Full-field ERGs were recorded from the corneal surface of each eye after pupil dilation (with 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine) with active contact lens electrodes (Mayo) using a computerized system with an electronically controlled Ganzfeld dome (Espion E2 with Colordome; Diagnosys). For photopic (light-adapted) measurements, a 30 cd/m2 background was used, and cone responses to 1-Hz (0.63–20 cd·s/m2) and 30-Hz (3.98, 10, and 20 cd·s/m2) flicker stimuli were recorded. All ERG responses were filtered at 0.3–500 Hz, and signal averaging was applied.
ISH.
ISH was performed using ViewRNA ISH Tissue Assay for RNA kits (catalog QVT0013, Affymetrix) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The ISH probe for mouse Vegfa and Itgam was designed and synthesized by Affymetrix (Vegfa, VB1-12654; Itgam, VB4-10683; Affymetrix).
Statistics.
All statistical tests were performed in GraphPad Prism 8. Data comparisons between 2 groups were performed using unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t tests or multiple 2-tailed t tests. Data comparisons between multiple groups were performed with 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. Statistical tests used for each experiment are specified in the figure legends. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study approval.
All animal experimental procedures were approved by The Scripps Research Institute Animal Care and Use Committee. All experiments were performed in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, 2011). For the human sample, the donor eye from a patient with MacTel type 2 (52-year-old female) was obtained as previously described (52). Informed consent and approval from The Scripps Research Institute IRB were obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Author contributions
YU, TK, and AUO designed the study and planned the experiments. AUO, YU, TK, EA, YI, SS, and SB performed the experiments. AUO, YU, and TK analyzed the data. AUO, YU, MID, and MF wrote the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Marcus Fruttiger for providing the retinal images from the patient with MacTel. We thank Mauricio Rosenfeld, Stacey K. Moreno, and Maki Kitano for excellent technical assistance and discussion. This work was supported by grants to MF from the National Eye Institute (EY-022025-01) and the Lowy Medical Research Institute (MacTel). AUO is supported by a fellowship from the Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation and JSPS KAKENHI grant 17K16984. YU was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant 16K11330 and research grants from Bayer Yakuhin Ltd. and Public Interest Foundation for the Elderly Eye Diseases Research Foundation.
Version 1. 05/21/2020
In-Press Preview
Version 2. 06/18/2020
Electronic publication
Version 3. 08/26/2020
The citation was corrected on the PDF.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Copyright: © 2020, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(12):e137317.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.137317.
Contributor Information
Ayumi Usui-Ouchi, Email: aouchi@scripps.edu.
Yoshihiko Usui, Email: usuyoshi@gmail.com.
Toshihide Kurihara, Email: kurihara@z8.keio.jp.
Edith Aguilar, Email: edith@scripps.edu.
Michael I. Dorrell, Email: mdorrell@pointloma.edu.
Yoichiro Ideguchi, Email: ideguchi@scripps.edu.
Susumu Sakimoto, Email: skmtssm@gmail.com.
Stephen Bravo, Email: sbravo@chla.usc.edu.
Martin Friedlander, Email: friedlan@scripps.edu.
References
- 1.Usui Y, et al. Angiogenesis and Eye Disease. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2015;1:155–184. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Miller JW. Age-related macular degeneration revisited--piecing the puzzle: the LXIX Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(1):1–35.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gass JD, Blodi BA. Idiopathic juxtafoveolar retinal telangiectasis. Update of classification and follow-up study. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(10):1536–1546. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(93)31447-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yannuzzi LA, et al. Retinal angiomatous proliferation in age-related macular degeneration. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 2001;21(5):416–434. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200110000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yannuzzi LA, Bardal AM, Freund KB, Chen KJ, Eandi CM, Blodi B. Idiopathic macular telangiectasia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(4):450–460. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.4.450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Usui-Ouchi A, Friedlander M. Anti-VEGF therapy: higher potency and long-lasting antagonism are not necessarily better. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(8):3032–3034. doi: 10.1172/JCI129862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Keir L, Moorsel Fv, Saleem MA, Richards A. Beware renal adverse effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment. BMJ. 2012;344:e3838. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Grunwald JE, et al. Risk of geographic atrophy in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):150–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kurihara T, et al. Hypoxia-induced metabolic stress in retinal pigment epithelial cells is sufficient to induce photoreceptor degeneration. Elife. 2016;5:e14319. doi: 10.7554/eLife.14319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kurihara T, Westenskow PD, Bravo S, Aguilar E, Friedlander M. Targeted deletion of Vegfa in adult mice induces vision loss. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(11):4213–4217. doi: 10.1172/JCI65157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sigler EJ, Randolph JC, Calzada JI, Charles S. Comparison of observation, intravitreal bevacizumab, or pars plana vitrectomy for non-proliferative type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(4):1097–1101. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2150-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Charbel Issa P, Finger RP, Kruse K, Baumüller S, Scholl HP, Holz FG. Monthly ranibizumab for nonproliferative macular telangiectasia type 2: a 12-month prospective study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(5):876–886.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gharbiya M, Parisi F, Cruciani F, Bozzoni-Pantaleoni F, Pranno F, Abdolrahimzadeh S. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for retinal angiomatous proliferation in treatment-naive eyes: long-term functional and anatomical results using a modified PrONTO-style regimen. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 2014;34(2):298–305. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182979e62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heckenlively JR, et al. Mouse model of subretinal neovascularization with choroidal anastomosis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 2003;23(4):518–522. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200308000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dorrell MI, et al. Antioxidant or neurotrophic factor treatment preserves function in a mouse model of neovascularization-associated oxidative stress. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(3):611–623. doi: 10.1172/JCI35977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ritter MR, Banin E, Moreno SK, Aguilar E, Dorrell MI, Friedlander M. Myeloid progenitors differentiate into microglia and promote vascular repair in a model of ischemic retinopathy. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(12):3266–3276. doi: 10.1172/JCI29683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jung S, et al. Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX(3)CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(11):4106–4114. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.11.4106-4114.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rathnasamy G, Foulds WS, Ling EA, Kaur C. Retinal microglia - A key player in healthy and diseased retina. Prog Neurobiol. 2019;173:18–40. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2018.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sun Y, et al. Inflammatory signals from photoreceptor modulate pathological retinal angiogenesis via c-Fos. J Exp Med. 2017;214(6):1753–1767. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Akhtar-Schäfer I, Wang L, Krohne TU, Xu H, Langmann T. Modulation of three key innate immune pathways for the most common retinal degenerative diseases. EMBO Mol Med. 2018;10(10):e8259. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201708259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sennlaub F, et al. CCR2(+) monocytes infiltrate atrophic lesions in age-related macular disease and mediate photoreceptor degeneration in experimental subretinal inflammation in Cx3cr1 deficient mice. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5(11):1775–1793. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201302692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Elmore MR, et al. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain. Neuron. 2014;82(2):380–397. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Okunuki Y, et al. Retinal microglia initiate neuroinflammation in ocular autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(20):9989–9998. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820387116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kubota Y, et al. M-CSF inhibition selectively targets pathological angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. J Exp Med. 2009;206(5):1089–1102. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liddelow SA, et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature. 2017;541(7638):481–487. doi: 10.1038/nature21029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bennett ML, et al. New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(12):E1738–E1746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525528113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen Y, Hu Y, Lu K, Flannery JG, Ma JX. Very low density lipoprotein receptor, a negative regulator of the wnt signaling pathway and choroidal neovascularization. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(47):34420–34428. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611289200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shi J, Hua L, Harmer D, Li P, Ren G. Cre Driver Mice Targeting Macrophages. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1784:263–275. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7837-3_24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dejda A, et al. Neuropilin-1-Expressing Microglia Are Associated With Nascent Retinal Vasculature Yet Dispensable for Developmental Angiogenesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(4):1530–1536. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Goldmann T, et al. Origin, fate and dynamics of macrophages at central nervous system interfaces. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(7):797–805. doi: 10.1038/ni.3423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mendes-Jorge L, et al. Scavenger function of resident autofluorescent perivascular macrophages and their contribution to the maintenance of the blood-retinal barrier. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(12):5997–6005. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hua J, et al. Resveratrol inhibits pathologic retinal neovascularization in Vldlr(–/–) mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(5):2809–2816. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Combadière C, et al. CX3CR1-dependent subretinal microglia cell accumulation is associated with cardinal features of age-related macular degeneration. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(10):2920–2928. doi: 10.1172/JCI31692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Taghavi Y, Hassanshahi G, Kounis NG, Koniari I, Khorramdelazad H. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2) in diabetic retinopathy: latest evidence and clinical considerations. J Cell Commun Signal. 2019;13(4):451–462. doi: 10.1007/s12079-018-00500-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stamatovic SM, Keep RF, Mostarica-Stojkovic M, Andjelkovic AV. CCL2 regulates angiogenesis via activation of Ets-1 transcription factor. J Immunol. 2006;177(4):2651–2661. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.4.2651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ridiandries A, Tan JT, Bursill CA. The Role of CC-Chemokines in the Regulation of Angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(11):E1856. doi: 10.3390/ijms17111856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Harada T, et al. Microglia-Müller glia cell interactions control neurotrophic factor production during light-induced retinal degeneration. J Neurosci. 2002;22(21):9228–9236. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-21-09228.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Srinivasan B, Roque CH, Hempstead BL, Al-Ubaidi MR, Roque RS. Microglia-derived pronerve growth factor promotes photoreceptor cell death via p75 neurotrophin receptor. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(40):41839–41845. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402872200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kaur C, Rathnasamy G, Ling EA. Roles of activated microglia in hypoxia induced neuroinflammation in the developing brain and the retina. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013;8(1):66–78. doi: 10.1007/s11481-012-9347-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schwartz M, Shechter R. Systemic inflammatory cells fight off neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6(7):405–410. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhao X, Eyo UB, Murugan M, Wu LJ. Microglial interactions with the neurovascular system in physiology and pathology. Dev Neurobiol. 2018;78(6):604–617. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brandenburg S, et al. Resident microglia rather than peripheral macrophages promote vascularization in brain tumors and are source of alternative pro-angiogenic factors. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(3):365–378. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1529-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Usui Y, et al. Neurovascular crosstalk between interneurons and capillaries is required for vision. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(6):2335–2346. doi: 10.1172/JCI80297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Joyal JS, et al. Retinal lipid and glucose metabolism dictates angiogenesis through the lipid sensor Ffar1. Nat Med. 2016;22(4):439–445. doi: 10.1038/nm.4059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Forstreuter F, Lucius R, Mentlein R. Vascular endothelial growth factor induces chemotaxis and proliferation of microglial cells. J Neuroimmunol. 2002;132(1-2):93–98. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(02)00315-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kerber M, et al. Flt-1 signaling in macrophages promotes glioma growth in vivo. Cancer Res. 2008;68(18):7342–7351. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Parkhurst CN, et al. Microglia promote learning-dependent synapse formation through brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Cell. 2013;155(7):1596–1609. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Clausen BE, Burkhardt C, Reith W, Renkawitz R, Förster I. Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic Res. 1999;8(4):265–277. doi: 10.1023/A:1008942828960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gerber HP, et al. VEGF is required for growth and survival in neonatal mice. Development. 1999;126(6):1149–1159. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.6.1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Buch T, et al. A Cre-inducible diphtheria toxin receptor mediates cell lineage ablation after toxin administration. Nat Methods. 2005;2(6):419–426. doi: 10.1038/nmeth762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Le YZ, et al. Inducible expression of cre recombinase in the retinal pigmented epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(3):1248–1253. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Powner MB, Gillies MC, Zhu M, Vevis K, Hunyor AP, Fruttiger M. Loss of Müller’s cells and photoreceptors in macular telangiectasia type 2. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(11):2344–2352. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.