Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Aug 6;9(32):e00655-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00655-20

MiSeq Sequencing of Salmonella enterica subsp. houtenae Isolates from a Dog Treated for Hind-Limb Paresis

Mary L Krath a, Andrew E Hillhouse b, Sara V Little a, Sara D Lawhon a,
Editor: Catherine Putontic
PMCID: PMC7409850  PMID: 32763933

The genomes of three clinical isolates of Salmonella enterica subsp. houtenae were sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq instrument. These isolates came from the urine and cerebrospinal fluid of a dog treated for hind-limb paresis with immunosuppressive drugs. S. enterica subsp. houtenae has also been implicated in brain infections in humans.

ABSTRACT

The genomes of three clinical isolates of Salmonella enterica subsp. houtenae were sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq instrument. These isolates came from the urine and cerebrospinal fluid of a dog treated for hind-limb paresis with immunosuppressive drugs. S. enterica subsp. houtenae has also been implicated in brain infections in humans.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Salmonella enterica subsp. houtenae was originally isolated from a cockatiel in 1978 and has been recovered from a variety of animals, including mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians (19). Although infrequently isolated from humans, S. enterica subsp. houtenae has been reported in association with meningitis and brain abscesses, primarily in children and immunocompromised adults (1014). The isolates sequenced here were originally isolated from urine (isolates 36GH and 76AB, collected in August and October 2019, respectively) and cerebrospinal fluid (isolate 38CD, collected in August 2019) from a 5-year-old spayed female boxer dog that was being treated with immunosuppressive drugs for hind-limb paresis.

Patient specimens were spread onto a blood agar plate (BAP) with Trypticase soy agar and 5% sheep’s blood and incubated at 35°C ± 2°C in an atmosphere supplemented with 5% CO2. The organisms were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry using the Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA) with flexControl v3.4 build 135.14 software. The National Veterinary Services Laboratory analyzed the organisms for serotyping and determined them to be S. enterica subsp. houtenae serotype 43:z4,z32:− (15).

Isolates were stored at −80°C in Brucella broth supplemented with 10% glycerol and revived for sequencing by inoculating an aliquot of the frozen bacteria onto a BAP. They were grown in 5 ml lysogeny broth overnight at 37°C with aeration. DNA isolation from 1-ml aliquots of the overnight cultures was performed according to the manufacturer’s (Macherey-Nagel) protocol using Macherey-Nagel type B bead tubes and lysis buffer from the NucleoMag tissue DNA kit with a Qiagen TissueLyser machine. DNA quality was verified using a genomic DNA TapeStation run (Agilent).

Default parameters were used for the following steps, and manufacturer’s instructions were followed, unless otherwise stated. Illumina libraries were prepared using the Illumina Nextera DNA Flex library preparation kit and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq v2 2 × 250-bp kit. All data were uploaded to BaseSpace v5.39, NativeApp.Core v0.9.0.2 (Illumina) for run monitoring, FASTQ file generation, demultiplexing, and adapter trimming. The sequencing output of paired-end read sets comprised 251 bp for all three isolates. Isolate 36GH had 1,616,328 reads, isolate 38CD had 1,411,316 reads, and isolate 76AB had 1,652,672 reads. This resulted in approximately 92× coverage, 80× coverage, and 94× coverage, respectively.

Assembly was conducted using the -careful parameter on SPAdes v3.13.0 (16). The assemblies of isolates 36GH, 38CD, and 76AB contained 77, 74, and 90 contigs, respectively. The genome lengths were 4,580,467, 4,579,974, and 4,586,535 bp, respectively, and the N50 contig lengths were 220,987, 265,007, and 265,007, respectively, with an approximate GC content of 51% for all three isolates. The Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) score was used to analyze completeness, with a score of 100% for all three isolates based on the Enterobacteriales OrthoDB v9 data set (17, 18).

The three isolates from this patient were all identified to be Salmonella enterica subspecies houtenae serovar 43:z4,z32:− using SeqSero, in agreement with the National Veterinary Laboratory report (15, 19). The three isolates were submitted for NCBI average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis, which confirmed their identification (20). Ribosomal multilocus sequence typing found that the 54 Salmonella ribosomal genes (Salmonella spp. carry two copies of rpmJ) were identical in these three isolates, supporting the idea that all three isolates were clonal (21). This supports the hypothesis that all three isolates from this patient, two from the urinary bladder collected at different times and one from the cerebrospinal fluid, were the same organism and that this was a case of disseminated salmonellosis.

Data availability.

The whole-genome shotgun sequences and raw reads for 36GH, 38CD, and 76AB can be found under the BioProject accession number PRJNA600881. The genome sequences for 36GH (TAMU36GH), 38CD (TAMU38CD), and 76AB (TAMU76AB) are available under the GenBank accession numbers JAAAGG000000000, JAAAGF000000000, and JAAAGE000000000, respectively. The raw reads are available under the SRA accession numbers SRR10876206, SRR10876207, and SRR10876208, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Mary L. Krath and Sara V. Little were each supported with a Texas A&M University Office of Graduate and Professional Studies’ Diversity Fellowship and a Walter W. Lechner Scholarship. This fellowship did not support the data collection, sequencing, or analysis. Departmental funds to Sara D. Lawhon supported the sequencing and analysis.

We thank and acknowledge the Texas A&M Institute for Genome Sciences and Society (TIGSS) for providing computational resources and systems administration support for the TIGSS HPC Cluster. We thank Melissa Andruzzi and Beth Boudreau, who conducted the original examination of the patient and submitted the clinical specimens to the Texas A&M University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital Clinical Microbiology Laboratory (CML) for evaluation. We also thank Jing Wu and the technical staff of the CML for their efforts to isolate and identify the organism.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Phillips WE Jr, Hatkin JM. 1978. Isolation of Salmonella houtenae from a cockateel. Avian Dis 22:350–353. doi: 10.2307/1589549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Runkel NS, Rodriguez LF, Moody FG, LaRocco MT, Blasdel T. 1991. Salmonella infection of the biliary and intestinal tract of wild opossums. Lab Anim Sci 41:54–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Millan J, Aduriz G, Moreno B, Juste RA, Barral M. 2004. Salmonella isolates from wild birds and mammals in the Basque Country (Spain). Rev Sci Tech 23:905–911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bauwens L, Vercammen F, Bertrand S, Collard J-M, De Ceuster S. 2006. Isolation of Salmonella from environmental samples collected in the reptile department of Antwerp Zoo using different selective methods. J Appl Microbiol 101:284–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02977.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marin C, Ingresa-Capaccioni S, González-Bodi S, Marco-Jiménez F, Vega S. 2013. Free-living turtles are a reservoir for Salmonella but not for Campylobacter. PLoS One 8:e72350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Krautwald-Junghanns M-E, Stenkat J, Szabo I, Ortlieb F, Blindow I, Neul A-K, Pees M, Schmidt V. 2013. Characterization of Salmonella isolated from captive and free-living snakes in Germany. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 126:209–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krawiec M, Kuczkowski M, Kruszewicz AG, Wieliczko A. 2015. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Salmonella in free-living birds in Poland. BMC Vet Res 11:15. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0332-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zottola T, Montagnaro S, Magnapera C, Sasso S, De Martino L, Bragagnolo A, D'Amici L, Condoleo R, Pisanelli G, Iovane G, Pagnini U. 2013. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella in European wild boar (Sus scrofa); Latium Region—Italy. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 36:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lukac M, Pedersen K, Prukner-Radovcic E. 2015. Prevalence of Salmonella in captive reptiles from Croatia. J Zoo Wildl Med 46:234–240. doi: 10.1638/2014-0098R1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ma J-S, Chen P-Y, Lau Y-J, Chi C-S. 2003. Brain abscess caused by Salmonella enterica subspecies houtenae in a patient with chronic granulomatous disease. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 36:282–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wybo I, Potters D, Plaskie K, Covens L, Collard JM, Lauwers S. 2004. Salmonella enterica subspecies houtenae serotype 44:z4,z23:− as a rare cause of meningitis. Acta Clin Belg 59:232–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tabarani CM, Bennett NJ, Kiska DL, Riddell SW, Botash AS, Domachowske JB. 2010. Empyema of preexisting subdural hemorrhage caused by a rare Salmonella species after exposure to bearded dragons in a foster home. J Pediatr 156:322–323. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nimir AR, Ibrahim R, Ibrahim IAA. 2011. Salmonella meningitis in a paediatric patient caused by Salmonella enterica serotype Houtenae. BMJ Case Rep 2011:bcr0420114096. doi: 10.1136/bcr.04.2011.4096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lourenco MCS, dos Reis EFM, Valls R, Asensi MD, Hofer E. 2004. Salmonella enterica subsp houtenae serogroup O:16 in a HIV positive patient: case report. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 46:169–170. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652004000300009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grimont PAD, Weill F-X, WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella . 2007. Antigenic formula of the Salmonella serovars. World Health Organization and Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R, Clingenpeel SR, Woyke T, McLean JS, Lasken R, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2013. Assembling single-cell genomes and mini-metagenomes from chimeric MDA products. J Comput Biol 20:714–737. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2013.0084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Waterhouse RM, Seppey M, Simão FA, Manni M, Ioannidis P, Klioutchnikov G, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2018. BUSCO applications from quality assessments to gene prediction and phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol 35:543–548. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang S, Yin Y, Jones MB, Zhang Z, Deatherage Kaiser BL, Dinsmore BA, Fitzgerald C, Fields PI, Deng X. 2015. Salmonella serotype determination utilizing high-throughput genome sequencing data. J Clin Microbiol 53:1685–1692. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00323-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ciufo S, Kannan S, Sharma S, Badretdin A, Clark K, Turner S, Brover S, Schoch CL, Kimchi A, DiCuccio M. 2018. Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:2386–2392. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jolley KA, Bliss CM, Bennett JS, Bratcher HB, Brehony C, Colles FM, Wimalarathna H, Harrison OB, Sheppard SK, Cody AJ, Maiden MCJ. 2012. Ribosomal multilocus sequence typing: universal characterization of bacteria from domain to strain. Microbiology 158:1005–1015. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.055459-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome shotgun sequences and raw reads for 36GH, 38CD, and 76AB can be found under the BioProject accession number PRJNA600881. The genome sequences for 36GH (TAMU36GH), 38CD (TAMU38CD), and 76AB (TAMU76AB) are available under the GenBank accession numbers JAAAGG000000000, JAAAGF000000000, and JAAAGE000000000, respectively. The raw reads are available under the SRA accession numbers SRR10876206, SRR10876207, and SRR10876208, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES