Ligilactobacillus salivarius TUCO-L2 was isolated from llama milk in Bio-Bio, Chile, and sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq platform. TUCO-L2 genome sequencing revealed a genome size of 1,600,747 bp with 1,691 protein-coding genes and a GC content of 33%. This draft genome sequence will contribute to a better understanding of the microbiome of llama milk.
ABSTRACT
Ligilactobacillus salivarius TUCO-L2 was isolated from llama milk in Bio-Bio, Chile, and sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq platform. TUCO-L2 genome sequencing revealed a genome size of 1,600,747 bp with 1,691 protein-coding genes and a GC content of 33%. This draft genome sequence will contribute to a better understanding of the microbiome of llama milk.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Maternal milk contains several species of lactobacilli (1, 2), including Ligilactobacillus salivarius (basonym Lactobacillus salivarius) (3), that beneficially modulate the establishment of gut microbiota and the development of immune systems in human (4–7), porcine, and bovine (8, 9) newborns. The milk microbiota from other domestic animals has been less explored. The Andean Mountains in South America harbor domestic animals with unique characteristics, including the domesticated camelid llama (Lama glama), which is valued in the local economy because of their meat, milk, and hair fiber (10, 11).
Here, we present the draft genome sequence of L. salivarius TUCO-L2, isolated from a milk sample from a llama in the Bio-Bio region of Chile. The milk sample (150 μl) was placed in de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) broth (Oxoid, Cambridge, UK; pH 3; HCl, 5 N) at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 12 h, and then the cultures were transferred to MRS agar for colony isolation. A single colony of TUCO-L2 cultured on MRS agar plates was inoculated into MRS broth and incubated at 37°C for 12 h. Genomic DNA isolation was performed by using a lysozyme lysis buffer (75 mM NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], and 10 mg/ml lysozyme), the chloroform-isoamyl alcohol separation method, and the isopropanol precipitation method, as described previously (12). The genomic DNA of L. salivarius TUCO-L2 was sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq platform using the 2 × 300-bp paired-end read length sequencing protocol. The paired-end sequencing library was prepared using the TruSeq DNA high-throughput (HT) sample prep kit (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The paired-end reads were filtered with PrinSeq lite v0.20.4 to remove low-quality reads (-min_qual_mean, 20; –min_len, 75) (13). After filtering, the selected reads were assembled using SPAdes v3.11.1 (14) with default parameters. The sequencing protocol generated a mean genome coverage of 52×. The TUCO-L2 draft genome sequence contains 409 contigs with an average GC content of 33% and a total estimated size of 1,600,747 bp.
Sequencing results were analyzed using various software programs at their default settings, unless otherwise specified. Gene prediction and annotation were performed using NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v4.8 (15) and Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) (16). This genome contained 1,691 DNA-coding sequences, 17 tRNA-coding sequences, and 3 rRNA-coding sequences.
System category distribution by RAST showed 210 subsystems. The TUCO-L2 genome contains genes involved in the transport and metabolism of lactose, glucose, and galactose that would confer to the bacteria the capacity to survive in the milk. A gene for a cholylglycine hydrolase was also detected, which could be involved in its ability to survive in the gastrointestinal tract (17). Genes of the SecA2-SecY2 system and two genes of MucBP domain-containing proteins were found in the genome of TUCO-L2, which have been proposed as important factors for the adaptation to the intestinal tract in L. salivarius strains isolated from pigs and chickens (17). BAGEL4 (18) and CRISPRCasFinder (19) were used to analyze the presence of bacteriocins and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR), respectively. The analysis revealed the presence of the enterolysin A gene and 1 CRISPR array in the draft genome sequence.
The draft genome sequence of L. salivarius TUCO-L2 will be useful for further studies of specific genetic features and could contribute to a better understanding of the microbiome of L. glama milk.
Data availability.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number SOPE00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, SOPE01000000. The SRA/DRA/ERA accession number is ERP114188. The BioProject and BioSample numbers are PRJNA527825 and SAMN11160677, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by ANPCyT-FONCyT grants PICT-2013-3219 and PICT-201-0410 to J.V. This study was also supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (19H00965) and Open Partnership Joint Projects of Bilateral Joint Research Projects from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) to H.K. and by JSPS Core-to-Core Program (Advanced Research Networks entitled “Establishment of international agricultural immunology research-core for a quantum improvement in food safety”).
REFERENCES
- 1.Martín R, Langa S, Reviriego C, Jimínez E, Marín ML, Xaus J, Fernández L, Rodríguez JM. 2003. Human milk is a source of lactic acid bacteria for the infant gut. J Pediatr 143:754–758. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Martín R, Jiménez E, Olivares M, Marín ML, Fernández L, Xaus J, Rodríguez JM. 2006. Lactobacillus salivarius CECT 5713, a potential probiotic strain isolated from infant feces and breast milk of a mother-child pair. Int J Food Microbiol 112:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, O'Toole PW, Pot B, Vandamme P, Walter J, Watanabe K, Wuyts S, Felis GE, Gänzle MG, Lebeer S. 2020. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:2782–2858. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martín R, Olivares M, Marín ML, Fernández L, Xaus J, Rodríguez JM. 2005. Probiotic potential of 3 lactobacilli strains isolated from breast milk. J Hum Lact 21:8–17. doi: 10.1177/0890334404272393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Olivares M, Díaz-Ropero MP, Martín R, Rodríguez JM, Xaus J. 2006. Antimicrobial potential of four Lactobacillus strains isolated from breast milk. J Appl Microbiol 101:72–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02981.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Díaz-Ropero MP, Martín R, Sierra S, Lara-Villoslada F, Rodríguez JM, Xaus J, Olivares M. 2007. Two Lactobacillus strains, isolated from breast milk, differently modulate the immune response. J Appl Microbiol 102:337–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03102.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Azagra-Boronat I, Tres A, Massot-Cladera M, Franch À, Castell M, Guardiola F, Pérez-Cano FJ, Rodríguez-Lagunas MJ. 2020. Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 supplementation in rats during pregnancy and lactation impacts maternal and offspring lipid profile, immune system and microbiota. Cells 9:575. doi: 10.3390/cells9030575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Quilodrán-Vega SR, Villena J, Valdebenito J, Salas MJ, Parra C, Ruiz A, Kitazawa H, García A. 2016. Isolation of lactic acid bacteria from swine milk and characterization of potential probiotic strains with antagonistic effects against swine-associated gastrointestinal pathogens. Can J Microbiol 62:514–524. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2015-0811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mahmoudi I, Ben Moussa O, El Moulouk Khaldi T, Le Roux Y, Hassouna M. 2018. Characterization of Lactobacillus strains isolated from bovine raw milk for probiotic and technological properties. Adv Appl Microbiol 8:719–733. doi: 10.4236/aim.2018.89048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mamani-Linares LW, Gallo CB. 2013. Meat quality attributes of the Longissimus lumborum muscle of the Kh’ara genotype of llama (Lama glama) reared extensively in northern Chile. Meat Sci 94:89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zarrin M, Riveros JL, Ahmadpour A, de Almeida AM, Konuspayeva G, Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Faye B, Hernández-Castellano LE. 2020. Camelids: new players in the international animal production context. Trop Anim Health Prod 52:903–913. doi: 10.1007/s11250-019-02197-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Azcárate-Peril MA, Raya RR. 2001. Methods for plasmid and genomic DNA isolation from Lactobacilli, p 135–139. In Food microbiology protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schmieder R, Edwards R, Bateman A. 2011. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27:863–864. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tatusova T, Dicuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee J-Y, Han GG, Kim EB, Choi Y-J. 2017. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus salivarius strains focusing on their host adaptation. Microbiol Res 205:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van Heel AJ, de Jong A, Song C, Viel JH, Kok J, Kuipers OP. 2018. BAGEL4: a user-friendly Web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W278–W281. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Couvin D, Bernheim A, Toffano-Nioche C, Touchon M, Michalik J, Néron B, Rocha EPC, Vergnaud G, Gautheret D, Pourcel C. 2018. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W246–W251. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number SOPE00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, SOPE01000000. The SRA/DRA/ERA accession number is ERP114188. The BioProject and BioSample numbers are PRJNA527825 and SAMN11160677, respectively.