Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Aug 7;59(5):730–734. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.08.013

Volume and Acuity of Emergency Department Visits Prior To and After COVID-19

Adeel A Butt ∗,†,, Aftab M Azad ∗,, Anand B Kartha ∗,, Naseer A Masoodi , Roberto Bertollini , Abdul-Badi Abou-Samra ∗,
PMCID: PMC7413056  PMID: 32919838

Abstract

Background

There are scant data regarding the change in volume and acuity of patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), compared with the pre-COVID-19 era.

Objective

To determine ED volumes and triage acuity prior to and after COVID-19.

Methods

We determined the volume of patients presenting to four large EDs affiliated with general, cardiac, cancer, and obstetrics hospitals, and the acuity of presenting illness (using the Canadian Triage Acuity Scale [CTAS]) for March and April 2020 and compared them with the same months in 2019 and January 2020. Together, these facilities see over 80% of the ED visits in Qatar. The first COVID-19 patient in Qatar was diagnosed on February 29, 2020.

Results

A total of 192,157 ED visits were recorded during the study period. There was a 20–43% overall drop in number of ED visits, with significant variability across hospitals. The Heart Hospital experienced the sharpest decline (33–89%), and the National Center for Cancer Care and Research experienced the least decline in volumes. The decline was observed across all CTAS levels, with the largest decline observed in individuals presenting with CTAS 1 and 2 (26–69% decline month by month). No increase in overall number of deaths or crude mortality rate was observed in the COVID-19 era, according to national statistics.

Conclusions

Sharp declines in ED visits and the triage acuity seen in both general and specialty hospitals raise the concern that severely ill patients may not be seeking timely care, and a surge may be expected once current restrictions on movement are lifted.

Keywords: COVID-19, emergency department, SARS-CoV-2, Qatar, acute illness

Introduction

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been associated with a decrease in acute care hospitalizations for cardiovascular and other acute care conditions (1,2). There are scant data regarding the change in volumes and triage acuity of patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) prior to and after COVID-19. A recent single-center report at an urban hospital in the United States reported a 35% decline in ED visits compared with the previous year (3). A reduction in volumes, particularly among those with severe acute conditions, may lead to a higher rate of complications and higher mortality in the general population.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted at Hamad Medical Corporation, the public health care system that provides approximately 90% of emergency care and hospital beds in the State of Qatar. Hamad Medical Corporation comprises 14 facilities, which include the largest tertiary care referral center in the country and one of the busiest EDs in the region (Hamad General Hospital), and dedicated national referral centers for cardiac (Heart Hospital), cancer (National Center for Cancer Care and Research), and obstetric/gynecologic (Women's Wellness and Research Center) care. Smaller secondary care general hospitals are scattered across the country, with more complicated emergency and acute care being referred to Hamad General Hospital. Hamad General Hospital has one of the largest EDs in the region, with annual volumes exceeding 550,000 visits, whereas the Women's Wellness and Research Center delivers over 18,000 babies annually. Patients suspected of acute coronary syndrome, particularly those who might require primary percutaneous interventions, are diverted to the Heart Hospital. All complex cancer care, including radiation therapy, is provided at the National Center for Cancer Care and Research. The Women's Wellness and Research Center sees the overwhelming majority of obstetrics cases in the country. All hospitals are accredited by the Joint Commission International and utilize the same electronic health records system (Cerner®, North Kansas City, MO), and patients retain the same unique medical record number across all hospitals.

The first COVID-19 patient in Qatar was diagnosed on February 29, 2020. We determined the number of individuals presenting to four EDs in the State of Qatar during March–April 2020 (COVID era) and compared it with the numbers in January 2020 and the same months (March–April) in 2019 (pre-COVID era). Each patient presenting to any of the EDs was evaluated by a registered nurse who recorded the chief complaint(s), obtained a brief history, recorded vital signs, and assigned a triage category based on the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), which is a validated scale with values ranging from 1–5, with “1” indicating immediate threat to life or limb requiring resuscitation and “5” indicating nonurgent conditions that do not require immediate attention and may be self-limiting or a part of a chronic problem (4).

The overall volume of patients presenting to each ED was determined and compared across the study months. Triage acuity was also compared across all months, across all hospitals. Changes were recorded as percentage changes across months.

Results

A total of 192,157 ED visits were recorded during the study period. The breakdown by hospital and study month is presented in Table 1 . There was a 20–43% overall drop in ED visits, with significant variability across hospitals. The Heart Hospital, which receives the most patients with acute coronary syndrome, experienced the sharpest decline (33% in March 2020; 89% in April 2020), whereas the National Center for Cancer Care and Research, which manages cancer patients, experienced the least decline in volumes (Table 1). The steepest decline in volumes at the Heart Hospital in April 2020 likely reflects an administrative decision to shift all walk-in patients to the main tertiary care hospital ED across the street. The decline was observed across all CTAS levels, with the largest decline observed in individuals presenting with CTAS 1 and 2 (26–69% decline month by month) (Table 2 ; Supplementary Figure 1, available online). An increase in number and proportion of persons with missing CTAS values was observed in the COVID era, which reflects individuals who did not wait to be screened after initial registration.

Table 1.

Number of Emergency Department Visits Per Hospital and Change in Volumes During the Study Period

Hamad General Hospital, n Heart Hospital, n National Center for Cancer Care and Research, n Women’s Wellness and Research Center, n Grand Totals, N
March 2019 34,612 1289 506 7532 43,939
April 2019 33,469 1204 448 7660 42,781
January 2020 35,839 1279 510 7205 44,833
March 2020 27,993 854 457 5815 35,119
April 2020 20,818 132 408 4127 25,485
Δ (Apr 2020 - Apr 2019) −37.80% −89.04% −8.93% −46.12% −40.43%
Δ (Mar 2020 - Mar 2019) −19.12% −33.75% −9.68% −22.80% −20.07%
Δ (Apr 2020 - Jan 2010) −41.91% −89.68% −20.00% −42.72% −43.16%
Δ (Mar 2020 - Jan 2020) −21.89% −33.23% −10.39% −19.29% −21.67%

CTAS = Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale.

Table 2.

Number of Emergency Department Visits Per Month by Severity Level At All Hospitals

CTAS 1 + 2
CTAS 3
CTAS 4
CTAS 5
Missing
n % n % n % n % n %
March 2019 2644 6.00% 15,135 34.40% 16,057 36.50% 9051 20.60% 1052 2.40%
April 2019 2227 5.20% 14,824 34.70% 15,891 37.10% 9100 21.30% 739 1.70%
January 2020 1345 3.00% 14,249 31.80% 18,446 41.10% 10,008 22.30% 785 1.80%
March 2020 824 2.30% 11,296 32.20% 14,291 40.70% 7647 21.80% 1061 3.00%
April 2020 994 3.90% 8175 32.10% 9188 36.10% 5341 21.00% 1787 7.00%
Δ (Apr 2020 - Apr 2019) −1233 −55.37% −6649 −44.85% −6703 −42.18% −3759 −41.31% 1048 58.65%
Δ (Mar 2020 - Mar 2019) −1820 −68.84% −3839 −25.37% −1766 −11.00% −1404 −15.51% 9 0.85%
Δ (Apr 2020 - Jan 2010) −351 −26.10% −6074 −42.63% −9258 −50.19% −4667 −46.63% 1002 56.07%
Δ (Mar 2020 - Jan 2020) −521 −38.74% −2953 −20.72% −4155 −22.53% −2361 −23.59% 276 26.01%

CTAS = Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale.

Missing triage category represents those individuals who registered to be seen but were not evaluated, having left the Emergency Department prior to triage evaluation.

To understand the impact of lower volumes and lesser numbers of patients with high triage acuity upon overall mortality in the country, we retrieved publicly available national data from the Planning and Statistics Authority (5). No significant spike in number of deaths or crude death rate was observed in March/April 2020, compared with previous months and with same months in 2019 (Supplementary Table 1, available online). However, a dramatic decline in number of live births was noted in March and April 2020 compared with previous months and year by year, with a rebound observed in May 2020.

Discussion

We observed a sharp decline in patients presenting to EDs at both general and specialty care hospitals in Qatar in the COVID era compared with earlier comparison periods. The drop in the number of persons with highest acuity of illness is concerning because these conditions require immediate medical attention and care. With the overall decrease in the number of patients presenting to EDs due to the pandemic and travel restrictions, one would expect the proportion of persons with more severe disease to be higher, because the sickest patients would be expected to present for care. According to national statistics, the number of deaths and crude mortality rate did not increase in March and April 2020, compared with previous months (Supplementary Table 1) (5). Although it may still be too early to gauge the impact of change in ED volumes upon outcomes and mortality, it is reassuring that the short-term mortality did not show an increase.

The sharp decline in persons presenting to the Heart Hospital is concerning. Because this hospital predominantly serves those with cardiovascular diseases, and is the sole center for primary percutaneous interventions for acute coronary syndrome, it is unclear whether there is an actual decline in number of hard cardiovascular disease events (e.g., acute myocardial infarction), or whether this represents a decline in patients with nonacute cardiac problems or symptoms of noncardiac origin. The steeper decline in April reflects an administrative decision to shift all walk-in patients to the nearby tertiary care hospital. However, the decline in March 2020, compared with the pre-COVID era, represents a true decline. The observation that the triage acuity in the COVID-19 months was sharply lower could indicate both patients with acute severe conditions opting not to come to the ED, and the possibility that fewer patients actually have acute conditions requiring immediate intervention.

A dramatic drop in reported births was observed in March and April 2020. These months coincide with the governmental decision to restrict travel within the country and the mandatory requirement for 80% of staff to work from home. We postulate that this resulted in delayed reporting and registration of births to the Planning and Statistics Authority. This assumption is supported by a sharp rebound in reported births in May 2020, though not to the prepandemic numbers. We expect this to further increase in the coming months as government offices catch up with all reports. Qatar's epidemiologic curve for the early months, with key government decisions, is presented in Supplementary Figure 2 (available online).

Limitations

We did not study the impact of specific movement and travel restrictions implemented by the State of Qatar upon the number of patients presenting to the EDs. The study period was limited to the first 2 months after the first COVID-19 patient was diagnosed in Qatar. The results may change after a longer-term follow-up, and we intend to update our results in the future.

Conclusions

The number of patients presenting to the all EDs and the triage acuity dropped sharply in the COVID-19 era. These declines were observed in both general and specialty hospitals, and raise the concern that severely ill patients may not be seeking timely care, and a surge may be expected once current restrictions on movement are lifted. It is imperative to determine whether these declines are associated with an increase in long-term overall mortality and rate of complications in the general population. If confirmed, this requires interventions to identify and provide appropriate care to these individuals.

Article Summary

1. Why is this topic important?

  • Understanding the impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon emergency department (ED) care is critical in planning and ensuring appropriate and timely care of patients with medical emergencies.

2. What does this study attempt to show?

  • This study demonstrates the changes in volumes and severity of presenting complaints in the COVID-19 era compared with the pre-COVID-19 era.

3. What are the key findings?

  • A 20–40% drop in ED visits was observed in the COVID era compared with the pre-COVID era.

  • The decline was observed in EDs affiliated with all hospitals.

  • Proportion of persons presenting with Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) 1 & 2 also dropped sharply.

4. How is patient care impacted?

  • Drops in CTAS 1 & 2 suggests that severely ill patients are not seeking timely care.

  • A surge in patients with more severe presenting complaints may be expected after the movement restrictions are lifted.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Medical Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Footnotes

Disclaimer: The views presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Hamad Medical Corporation or the Ministry of Public Health, Qatar.

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.08.013.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Table and Figures
mmc1.docx (153.4KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Solomon M.D., McNulty E.J., Rana J.S. The Covid-19 pandemic and the incidence of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2015630. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baum A., Schwartz M.D. Admissions to Veterans Affairs hospitals for emergency conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA. 2020;324:96–99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Westgard B.C., Morgan M.W., Vazquez-Benitez G., Erickson L.O., Zwank M.D. An analysis of changes in emergency department visits after a state declaration during the time of COVID-19. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed202006019. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bullard M.J., Musgrave E., Warren D. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) guidelines 2016. CJEM. 2017;19(suppl 2):S18–S27. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Planning and Statistics Authority (PSA), State of Qatar, Latest Statistics. https://www.psa.gov.qa/en/statistics1/StatisticsSite/LatestStatistics/Pages/default.aspx Available at:

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table and Figures
mmc1.docx (153.4KB, docx)

Articles from The Journal of Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES