Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):e0234672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234672

Analysis of opticin binding to collagen fibrils identifies a single binding site in the gap region and a high specificity towards thin heterotypic fibrils containing collagens II, and XI or V/XI

Uwe Hansen 1,2,*, David F Holmes 3, Peter Bruckner 1, Paul N Bishop 4,5,*
Editor: Dragana Nikitovic6
PMCID: PMC7413481  PMID: 32764753

Abstract

Opticin is a class III member of the extracellular matrix small leucine-rich repeat protein/proteoglycan (SLRP) family found in vitreous humour and cartilage. It was first identified associated with the surface of vitreous collagen fibrils and several other SLRPs are also known to bind collagen fibrils and it some cases alter fibril morphology. The purpose of this study was to investigate the binding of opticin to the collagen II-containing fibrils found in vitreous and cartilage. Electron microscopic studies using gold labelling demonstrated that opticin binds vitreous and thin cartilage collagen fibrils specifically at a single site in the gap region of the collagen D-period corresponding to the e2 stain band; this is the first demonstration of the binding site of a class III SLRP on collagen fibrils. Opticin did not bind thick cartilage collagen fibrils from cartilage or tactoids formed in vitro from collagen II, but shows high specificity for thin, heterotypic collagen fibrils containing collagens II, and XI or V/XI. Vitreous collagen fibrils from opticin null and wild-type mice were compared and no difference in fibril morphology or diameter was observed. Similarly, in vitro fibrillogenesis experiments showed that opticin did not affect fibril formation. We propose that when opticin is bound to collagen fibrils, rather than influencing their morphology it instead hinders the binding of other molecules to the fibril surfaces and/or act as an intermediary bridge linking the collagen fibrils to other non-collagenous molecules.

Introduction

Opticin is a member of the extracellular matrix small leucine-rich repeat protein/proteoglycan (SLRP) family that was first identified in vitreous humour and subsequently in cartilage [1,2]. There are 18 members of the SLRP family which have been divided into 5 classes based upon phylogeny [3]. Opticin is in class III and is therefore closely related to the other class III SLRPs, epiphycan and osteoglycin/mimecan. Little is known about the functions of class III SLRPs, but opticin has been shown to possess anti-angiogenic properties both in vitro and in vivo, and mechanistic experiments suggested that its anti-angiogenic effects are elicited by opticin binding to collagen resulting in steric inhibition of endothelial cell integrin-collagen interactions [4,5]. However, this conclusion was drawn from experiments using monomeric collagens, whereas in vivo these collagens are in fibrillar structures. Furthermore, recent work has demonstrated that integrins that bind collagen monomers do not bind collagen in fibrils directly, instead these integrins interact with non-collagenous molecules associated with the surface of the fibrils [6]. It has also been demonstrated that opticin deficient mice are protected against osteoarthritis because the lack of opticin results in an alteration in the amounts of other SLRPs in cartilage leading to altered fibril diameter and increased protection from proteolysis [7]. The above studies prompted us to investigate interactions between opticin and collagen fibrils.

The vitreous humour contains a network of fine collagen fibrils of uniform thickness (10–20 nm depending upon species) that impart gel-like properties to the tissue [8], whereas in human cartilage there are both thin ~ 18 nm diameter fibrils and thicker fibrils [9,10]. The collagen fibrils from these two tissues are very similar in their collagen composition: They are heterotypic (mixed in composition) fibrils in which fibril-forming type II collagen predominate, the fibrils also contain collagen IX and XI or V/XI. Collagen IX is a part-time proteoglycan and a member of the FACIT (Fibril-Associated Collagens with Interrupted Triple-helices) group of collagens that is located on the surface of the fibrils and has a role in preventing fibril aggregation [9,11]. Collagen XI and V/XI are very closely related fibril-forming collagens both containing an α1(XI) chain, in addition collagen XI contains α2(XI) and α3(XI) chains and vitreous collagen V/XI contains an α2(V) chain, but the identity of the third α-chain is uncertain [12]. Hybrid molecules containing α1(V) and α2(XI) collagen chains have also been described in articular cartilage [13]. The collagen content of the fibrils determines their morphology and it is possible to generate heterotypic collagen fibrils in vitro that have identical morphology to their tissue counterparts [14]. Natural collagen II alone does not form fibrils in vitro but rather forms short, tapered tactoids with D-periodic banding. However, when mixed with sufficient type XI collagen, thin fibrils of uniform diameter are formed. Here, using fibrils formed in vivo and in vitro, we investigated the binding of opticin to collagen fibrils and the effects of opticin on fibril morphology.

Results

Analysis of vitreous collagen fibrils from wild-type and opticin null mice

The vitreous collagen fibrils of opticin null and wild-type mice appeared morphologically identical (Fig 1A and 1B). The mean diameter of the fibrils from the opticin null mice was 9.99 nm +/- 2.12 nm (n = 286) and from wild-type mice was 10.77 nm +/- 2.17 nm (n = 290); statistical analysis revealed no significant difference (p = 0.38); this and subsequent statistical analyses used the two-sided Student`s t-test.

Fig 1. Ultrastructural analyses of vitreous and cartilage collagen fibrils.

Fig 1

Electron microscopy of vitreous collagen fibrils (black arrows) from wild-type (A) and opticin null (B) mice showing morphological identity; there was no difference in mean fibril diameter (white arrow heads indicate inner retinal surface). (C-E) Opticin antibody in conjunction with 18 nm gold-conjugated secondary antibody demonstrates opticin on the surface of bovine vitreous collagen fibrils (C); endogenous opticin was not detected on cartilage collagen fibrils (D). Recombinant opticin added to cartilage fibrils in vitro was detected by immunogold labelling on the surface of thin (black arrowhead), but not thick fibrils (E, bars 100nm).

Opticin localisation of authentic bovine vitreous and cartilage collagen fibrils

Bovine vitreous collagen fibrils were analysed by immunoelectron microscopy using polyclonal opticin antibodies and gold-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulins. These collagen fibrils showed extensive labelling (Fig 1C). Whilst opticin has been identified in cartilage [2,7], we could not detect endogenous opticin by immunogold electron microscopy in our preparations of cartilage fibrils preparations (Fig 1D). Therefore, we investigated the localisation of opticin after it had been added to authentic cartilage fibril preparations that had been digested with chondroitin ABC lyase (to prevent steric hindrance from glycosaminoglycans). We then observed that opticin localised to the thin fibrils, but not thick collagen fibrils (Fig 1E).

Localisation of opticin on vitreous collagen fibrils in relation to D-period

To locate precisely the site of opticin binding, vitreous collagen fibrils were incubated with recombinant opticin that had been directly labelled with gold particles and the position of binding in relation to the D-period was analysed (Fig 2A). Along the 67 nm D-period, a binding site was observed at 39 nm from the N-terminal end of the gap region (Fig 2B and 2C). When this was correlated with the banding pattern according to the notation of Schmitt and Gross [15] the peak position of opticin binding (Fig 2B) corresponded to the position of the e2 positive stain band in the gap region, S1 Fig. Comparison of this binding site to the established axial structure of the vitreous heterotypic fibrils [16], S1 Fig, showed that there are four possible sites of interaction of the opticin on the triple helices of both collagen II (Fig 2D) and collagen V/XI molecules (Fig 2F). Furthermore, interaction of the bound opticin with all 3 domains of the type IX collagen molecule is possible (Fig 2E), but not with the retained N-propeptide of the type V/IX collagen molecule (Fig 2F).

Fig 2. Ultrastructural localization of gold-conjugated opticin.

Fig 2

Opticin that had been directly conjugated to 6 nm gold particles (white arrowhead) was incubated with isolated vitreous collagen fibrils and the fibrils were examined by electron microscopy (A). The average axial stain exclusion pattern (ASEP) is shown (repeated over 2 D-periods) (B); the peaks corresponding to the N- and C-terminal ends of collagen II molecules are indicated and the arrow indicates molecular polarity. This reference pattern was cross-correlated with the axial pattern from each labelled fibril to establish the molecular polarity and position of the gold label within the D-period (C). Diagrams (D-F) show the axial arrangement of collagen molecules in the heterotypic fibril producing the characteristic gap-overlap structure. Collagen II molecules are shown in black with the opticin binding position shown as a red line (D). The axial location of collagen IX [16] is shown in (E) with previously established polarity and folded back domains [17]. The axial location of the bound opticin (shown for 2 adjacent D-periods) includes all three domains of the collagen IX molecule. The axial location of collagen V/XI is shown in black (F); the retained N-propeptide protrudes onto the fibril surface and is axially located as shown. The opticin axial binding site does not overlap with the N-propeptide. The scale bar in (A) corresponds to a single D-period (67nm).

Opticin binding to collagen monomers and effect during fibril reconstitution

We have previously shown that recombinant bovine opticin binds to immobilised bovine collagen types I and II monomers using microtiter plate assays [4]. Prior to studying opticin binding to reconstituted fibrils, we investigated the binding of opticin to monomeric chick collagens using solid-phase assays and found that it bound chick collagens II, IX and IX, S2 Fig. Collagen fibrils were generated in vitro using purified chick collagens II, IX, and XI as previously described [14]. Collagen fibrils were generated using either mixtures of collagens II and XI or II, IX and XI in molar proportions of 8:1 or 8:1:1, respectively. These mixtures were supplemented with 0–50 μg/ml of opticin, added at the start of fibrillogenesis. In mixtures of collagens II/IX/XI or II/XI turbidity developed without a lag phase and the shape of the turbidity curves was unaffected by the presence of opticin, S3 Fig; therefore, opticin did not affect the rate of fibril formation. Immunoelectron microscopy confirmed the presence of opticin on the surface of the reconstituted fibrils, S4 Fig. Analysis of the reconstituted fibrils demonstrated that opticin did not significantly affect the final mean diameter of the collagen II/XI fibrils (19.71 +/- 4.07 nm (n = 118) without opticin; 20.38 +/- 3.29 nm (n = 102) with 25 μg/ml of opticin, p = 0.21). In the case of collagen II/IX/XI fibrils the final mean diameter was slightly increased by the presence of 25 μg/ml opticin during fibrillogenesis (17.64 +/- 2.90 nm (n = 142) without opticin; 18.89 +/- 3.19 nm (n = 130) with opticin, p = 0.008).

Binding of opticin to preformed fibrils and tactoids

Opticin bound to the surface of fibrils containing collagens II/XI or II/IX/XI when added after reconstitution of fibrils (Fig 3A and 3B). Scant opticin binding was also observed when added to reconstituted fibrils composed of just type XI collagen (Fig 3C and 3D). However, no binding was observed to the thick, banded tactoids formed by type II collagen alone (Fig 3E and 3F).

Fig 3. Binding of opticin to pre-formed reconstituted collagen fibrils.

Fig 3

Fibrils were reconstituted, incubated with opticin, then analysed by immunoelectron microscopy following incubation with the opticin antibody and secondary antibody conjugated with 18 nm gold particles: (A) Fibrils containing collagens II and XI and (B) collagens II, IX and XI incubated with 10 μg/ml of opticin; collagen XI fibrils incubated with 5 (C) and 50 μg/ml (D) of opticin; (E,F) tapering end and middle part of collagen II tactoids incubated with 50 μg/ml of opticin; (bars 100 nm).

Discussion

SLRPs generally bind to collagen and several have been shown to modify fibril morphology, although much of this research has been done using collagen I-containing fibrils, rather than the collagen II-containing fibrils found in vitreous and cartilage [18]. Whilst several SLRPs are present in vitreous [19], opticin is of particular interest because it was found to be a major component of a pool of macromolecules that strongly associated with vitreous collagen fibrils [1]. Here we confirm that opticin binds to the surface of vitreous collagen fibrils. Furthermore, opticin localises specifically to a single binding site in the gap region of the collagen fibril D-period corresponding to the e2 stain band of the collagen I (or II) fibril [20]. This is the first identification of the binding site of a class III SLRP on collagen fibrils. Other SLRPs have been shown to bind to the gap region of collagen II-containing fibrils including decorin and fibromodulin and biochemical experiments suggested that their binding sites are not overlapping [9,21,22].

Using the in-vitro fibrillogenesis system [14], we show that opticin has no effect on the rate of fibrillogenesis and no effect, or minimal effect, on fibril diameter. The mean diameter of fibrils containing collagens II/IX/XI was slightly greater when formed in the presence of opticin compared to when opticin was absent, but this could simply represent opticin on the fibril surfaces rather than modification to the underlying collagen structure. These fibrils formed in vitro closely resemble the thin cartilage collagen fibrils found in vivo, which have the same molar ratio of collagens and a diameter of 15–18 nm [9,10,23] and vitreous collagen fibrils which have a diameter of 10–20 nm depending upon species and method of analysis [8,16]. The conclusion that opticin does not affect fibril morphology was further supported by comparing the diameter of vitreous collagen fibrils from opticin null and wild-type mice where no significant difference was observed. It is of note that there was also no difference in the diameter of corneal collagen fibrils when mice deficient in the class III SLRP mimecan were compared to wild-type mice [24]; suggesting that generally type III SLRPs, whilst binding to collagen fibrils, do not directly influence their morphology during fibrillogenesis.

An intriguing observation was that opticin binds to the thin collagen fibrils from cartilage (that closely resemble vitreous collagen fibrils), but not the thick collagen fibrils; by contrast decorin binds to thick, but not thin cartilage fibrils [9]. To explore these observations further we investigated the binding of opticin to different types of fibrils/tactoids formed in vitro. Opticin did not bind tactoids formed from just type II collagen, and did not bind to fibrils just composed of just collagen I, S5 Fig, despite binding to monomeric collagens I and II. There was limited binding to fibrils composed of just collagen XI. However, once copolymers were formed from collagens II/XI or II/IX/XI resembling vitreous or thin cartilage collagen fibrils, extensive binding of opticin was observed. These data show that collagen II must form a copolymer with collagen XI (and presumably collagen V/XI in vitreous) to assemble into thin fibrils that then provide a specific opticin binding site. This is the first time that a member of the SLRP family has been shown to require a particular fibrillar collagen copolymer for binding, and this work raises the possibility that other members of the SLRP family have similarly exacting requirements for binding to collagen fibrils.

The above data suggests that the function of opticin is to modulate the surface interactions of vitreous and thin cartilage collagen fibrils rather than influence their morphology. The absence of opticin in vitreous promotes angiogenesis and possibly opticin prevents the binding of other non-collagenous protein to the fibril surfaces that provide endothelial cell integrin binding sites and thereby promote angiogenesis. Opticin null mice showed protection against osteoarthritis and it was found that these mice had increased levels of lumican and epiphycan, and decreased levels of fibromodulin [7]. Here opticin may prevent the fibrils from interacting with other SLRPs that do alter fibril morphology and provide increased protection against proteases. So, in conclusion, we propose that opticin has exacting requirements for collagen fibril binding and only binds a specific site on the surface of thin fibrils containing collagens II and XI or V/XI, there modulating the interactions of other molecules with the collagen surfaces.

Materials and methods

Materials

The production and characterisation of opticin null mice has been described previously [5], and was undertaken under institutional and UK Home Office guidelines under Project License 40/2819. Fresh bovine tissue was obtained from a local slaughterhouse; vitreous gels were isolated from the eyes and articular cartilage was prepared for electron microscopy from tarsometatarsal joints (2-yr-old cows) as described previously [25]. The production, purification and characterization of recombinant bovine opticin has been described elsewhere [26,27]. Opticin antibodies derived by affinity purification of a polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against bovine opticin has been described previously [4].

Electron microscopy of vitreous from opticin null and wild-type mice

Eyes from adult (less than 6 months old) opticin null mice and wild type C57BL/6 mice were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, at room temperature. The eyes were then dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series then incubated in propylene oxide prior to embedding in Taab resin (Taab Laboratories Equipment, Aldermaston, UK). Ultrathin sections were cut and stained with 2% uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate. Electron micrographs were taken at 60 kV with a Philips EM 301 electron microscope.

Solid phase binding assays

Polystyrene microtiter plates were coated overnight at 4°C with 10 μg of purified chick collagen II, IX or XI, or 1 μg heparin albumin (positive control). After washing with TBS, the wells were blocked by incubating with 2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in TBS at room temperature prior to further washing with TBS containing 0.04% Tween 20 (TBS-T). Opticin was then added at a concentration ranging between 1 μg/ml to 50 μg/ml dissolved in 100 μl of TBS. After incubating for 1 h at room temperature the wells were washed with TBS-T. Bound opticin was subsequently detected with the opticin antibody followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody raised against rabbit immunoglobulins. Absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a microplate reader.

In Vitro fibrillogenesis

Collagens II, IX, and XI from cultures of chick embryo sternal chondrocytes in agarose gels were purified in their native and fibrillogenesis-competent states as previously described [14]. Mixtures of collagens II and XI or collagens II, IX, and XI in were dissolved 0.1 M Tris-HCl, 0.4 M NaCl, pH 7.4 (storage buffer) at molar ratios of 8:1 or 8:1:1, respectively, and were reconstituted in vitro into fibrils. Pure collagens I, XI or II in storage buffer were also used for in vitro fibrillogenesis or for the generation of tactoids, respectively. Recombinant opticin was added at concentrations ranging from 0 to 50 μg/ml in storage buffer. Fibrillogenesis was initiated by dilution of the reaction mixtures with an equal volume of distilled water followed by immediate warming to 37 oC. Fibrillogenesis was monitored by turbidity development at 313 nm and by immunogold electron microscopy.

Immunoelectron microscopy using gold-labelled secondary antibody

Preparations containing vitreous collagen fibrils, cartilage collagen fibrils or aliquots of reconstitution products following in vitro fibrillogenesis were spotted onto sheets of Parafilm. Nickel grids covered with Formvar and coated with carbon were floated on the drops for 10 min to allow adsorption of material, then washed with PBS prior to treating for 30 min with PBS containing 2% (w/v) milk powder (milk solution). In some experiments, fibrils were then incubated for 1 h with exogenous recombinant opticin (concentration ranging from 0 μg/ml to 50 μg/ml) in PBS or phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1 M NaCl prior to washing several times with PBS. Next, the grids (with or without incubation with recombinant opticin) were incubated for 2 h with polyclonal opticin antibodies diluted 1:600 in milk solution. After washing five times with PBS, the grids were put on drops of milk solution containing (1:100) goat anti-rabbit IgG coated conjugated with 18 nm colloidal gold particles (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Finally, the grids were washed with distilled water and negatively stained with 2% uranyl acetate for 7 min. Control experiments were without primary antibodies. Electron micrographs were taken at 60 kV with a Philips EM 410 electron microscope.

Electron microscopy with gold-conjugated opticin

Recombinant opticin was incubated with 6 nm gold sol following manufacturer’s instructions (Aurion). Isolated vitreous collagen fibrils were incubated with opticin gold conjugate for 2 h at room temperature prior to absorbing onto carbon coated nickel grids. The grids were washed several times with distilled water and negatively stained with 5% uranyl acetate for 12 min. Electron micrographs were taken at 120 kV with an FEI Tecnai transmission electron microscope. Densitometric scanning of the D-period was undertaken as described previously [16] and the position of gold particles along the D-period was analysed. The polarity of each fibril was determined by cross-correlation with a reference average axial stain exclusion pattern (ASEP) and this also allowed the position of the gold particle label within the D-period to be determined.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Relationship of the negative stain pattern of vitreous collagen fibrils to the positive and negative stain patterns of collagen I.

(A) and (B) show the positive and negative stain patterns, respectively, of collagen I fibrils. The 12 stain lines of the positive stain pattern (A) are labelled with the standard nomenclature [15]. The gap-overlap structure is indicated on the negative stain pattern [20] along with the axial locations of the N- and C-ends of the collagen molecules (B); the molecular polarity is indicated by the arrow. (C) shows the average negative stain pattern for the vitreous fibrils in the present study oriented and aligned with the collagen I stain patterns.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Solid-phase binding experiments with immobilised monomeric chick collagens.

Opticin showed concentration-dependent binding to collagens II, IX and XI (heparin albumin was used as a positive control).

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Kinetics of in-vitro fibril formation.

Turbidity measurements at 313 nm during fibrillogenesis with collagens II and XI or collagens II, IX and XI in the presence of varying concentrations of opticin.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Ultrastructure of fibrils formed in vitro in the presence of varying concentrations of opticin.

Collagen fibrils reconstituted from mixtures of collagens II and XI (A,C,E) and collagens II, IX, and XI (B,D,F) followed by immunoelectron microscopy with opticin antibody and gold conjugated secondary antibody. There was no labelling in the absence of opticin (A,B); when the fibrils were reconstituted in the presence of 5 μg/ml of opticin, immunogold labelling was observed (C,D), and increased labelling was observed when reconstituted with 25 μg/ml of opticin (E,F), (bars 100 nm).

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Immunogold electron microscopy showing lack of binding of opticin to pre-formed reconstituted collagen 1 fibrils.

Collagen I was purified in a native and fibrillogenesis-competent form from tarso-metatarsal tendons of 17-day-old chicken embryos as described previously [1]. Fibrils were formed in vitro then immunoelectron microscopy using opticin antibodies and gold-labelled secondary antibody was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Fibrils were incubated with 5 μg/ml of opticin (A), 50 μg/ml of opticin (B) or in control experiments an equal volume of storage buffer without opticin (C), (bars 200 nm).

(TIF)

S1 Text

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Carolyn Jones (University of Manchester) for undertaking the electron microscopy on thin sections of mouse eyes.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 492 project A2 to P.B.; https://www.dfg.de/en/) and UK Medical Research Council (MRC Reference: MR/M025365/1 to P.N.B.; https://mrc.ukri.org/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Reardon AJ, Le Goff M, Briggs MD, McLeod D, Sheehan JK, Thornton DJ, et al. Identification in vitreous and molecular cloning of opticin, a novel member of the family of leucine-rich repeat proteins of the extracellular matrix, J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 2123–2129. 10.1074/jbc.275.3.2123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Monfort J, Tardif G, Roughley P, Reboul P, Boileau C, Bishop PN, et al. Identification of opticin, a member of the small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycan family, in human articular tissues: a novel target for MMP-13 in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008; 16: 749–755. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Proteoglycan form and function: A comprehensive nomenclature of proteoglycans. Matrix Biol. 2015; 42: 11–55. 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Le Goff MM, Sutton MJ, Slevin M, Latif A, Humphries MJ, Bishop PN. Opticin exerts its anti-angiogenic activity by regulating extracellular matrix adhesiveness. J Biol Chem. 2012: 287: 28027–28036. 10.1074/jbc.M111.331157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Le Goff MM, Lu H, Ugarte M, Henry S, Takanosu M, Mayne R, et al. The vitreous glycoprotein opticin inhibits preretinal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 228–234. 10.1167/iovs.11-8514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Woltersdorf C, Bonk M, Leitinger B, Huhtala M, Käpylä J, Heino J, et al. The binding capacity of α1β1-, α2β1- and α10β1-integrins depends on non-collagenous surface macromolecules rather than the collagens in cartilage fibrils. Matrix Biol. 2017; 63: 91–105. 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Farrán A, Valverde-Franco G, Tío L, Lussier B, Fahmi H, Pelletier JP, et al. In vivo effect of opticin deficiency in cartilage in a surgically induced mouse model of osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 457 10.1038/s41598-017-18047-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bishop PN. Structural macromolecules and supramolecular organisation of the vitreous gel. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000; 19: 323–344. 10.1016/s1350-9462(99)00016-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hagg R, Bruckner P, Hedbom E. Cartilage fibrils of mammals are biochemically heterogeneous: differential distribution of decorin and collagen IX. J Cell Biol. 1998; 142: 285–294. 10.1083/jcb.142.1.285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gottardi R, Hansen U, Raiteri R, Loparic M, Düggelin M, Mathys D, et al. Supramolecular Organization of Collagen Fibrils in Healthy and Osteoarthritic Human Knee and Hip Joint Cartilage. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0163552 10.1371/journal.pone.0163552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bishop PN, Holmes DF, Kadler KE, McLeod D, Bos KJ. Age-related changes on the surface of vitreous collagen fibrils. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45: 1041–1046. 10.1167/iovs.03-1017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mayne R, Brewton RG, Mayne PM, Baker JR. Isolation and characterization of the chains of type V/type XI collagen present in bovine vitreous. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 9381–9386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.von der Mark K. Structure, biosynthesis and gene regulation of collagens in cartilage and bone In: Siebel MJ, Robins SP, Bilezikian JP, editors. Dynamics of bone and cartilage metabolism: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2006. pp. 3–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Blaschke UK, Eikenberry EF, Hulmes DJ, Galla HJ, Bruckner P. Collagen XI nucleates self-assembly and limits lateral growth of cartilage fibrils. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 10370–10378. 10.1074/jbc.275.14.10370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Meek KM, Chapman JA, Hardcastle RA. The staining pattern of collagen fibrils. Improved correlation with sequence data. J Biol Chem 1979; 254: 10710–10714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bos KJ, Holmes DF, Kadler KE, McLeod D, Morris NP, Bishop PN. Axial structure of the heterotypic collagen fibrils of vitreous humour and cartilage. J Mol Biol. 2001; 306: 1011–1022. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eyre DR, Wu JJ, Fernandes RJ, Pietka TA, Weis MA. Recent developments in cartilage research: matrix biology of the collagen II/IX/XI heterofibril network. Biochem Soc Trans. 2002; 30: 894–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kalamajski S, Oldberg A. The role of small leucine-rich proteoglycans in collagen fibrillogenesis, Matrix Biol. 2010; 4: 248–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Skeie JM, Roybal CN, Mahajan VB. Proteomic insight into the molecular function of the vitreous. PLoS One. 2015: 10: e0127567 10.1371/journal.pone.0127567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chapman JA, Tzaphlidou M, Meek KM, Kadler KE. The collagen fibril—a model system for studying the staining and fixation of a protein, Electron Microsc Rev. 1990; 3: 143–182. 10.1016/0892-0354(90)90018-n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hedbom E, Heinegård D, Binding of fibromodulin and decorin to separate sites on fibrillar collagens. J Biol Chem. 1993: 268: 27307–27312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hedlund H, Mengarelli-Widholm S, Heinegård D, Reinholt FP, Svensson O. Fibromodulin distribution and association with collagen. Matrix Biol. 1994; 14: 227–232. 10.1016/0945-053x(94)90186-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Holmes DF, Kadler KE. The 10+4 microfibril structure of thin cartilage fibrils, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103: 17249–17254. 10.1073/pnas.0608417103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beecher N, Carlson C, Allen BR, Kipchumba R, Conrad GW, Meek KM, et al. An x-ray diffraction study of corneal structure in mimecan-deficient mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46: 4046–4049. 10.1167/iovs.05-0325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kassner A, Hansen U, Miosge N, Reinhardt DP, Aigner T, Bruckner-Tuderman L, et al. Discrete integration of collagen XVI into tissue-specific collagen fibrils or beaded microfibrils. Matrix Biol. 2003; 22: 131–143. 10.1016/s0945-053x(03)00008-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Le Goff MM, Hindson VJ, Jowitt TA, Scott PG, Bishop PN. Characterization of opticin and evidence of stable dimerization in solution. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 45280–45287. 10.1074/jbc.M303117200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hindson VJ, Gallagher JT, Halfter W, Bishop PN. Opticin binds to heparan and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46: 4417–4423. 10.1167/iovs.05-0883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Dragana Nikitovic

10 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-16285

Analysis of opticin binding to collagen fibrils identifies a single binding site in the gap region and a high specificity towards thin heterotypic fibrils containing collagens II, and XI or V/XI.

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bishop,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please correct minor typographic errors and shortly disccussed why you focused on opticin binding.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 20-07-2020. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dragana Nikitovic, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Congratulations to the authors for the work on this subject.

The authors used electron mircroscopic studies in order to describe opticin binding to fibrillary collagen structures in vitreous and cartilage collagen.

Their comments on opticin binding non altering morphology of the fibrillary structures are fascinating and based om measurements of fibril diameter, but is this sufficient to conclude on morphology?

Opticin is present in vitreous and cartilage but so is e.g. biglycan, so why did the authors choose to address opticin binding only?

Please correct "predominates" to "predominate" on line 64 and "collagen II, IX and IX" to "collagen II, IX and XI" on line 146

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):e0234672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234672.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


20 Jul 2020

Dear Dr Nikitovic

Thank you for your Email concerning our manuscript. You asked us to submit a revised version on the manuscript addressing the points that were raised during the review process. We hope that these have been addressed in the revised manuscript. Below is our response to the specific issues that have ben raised.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

These have been checked and I hope they meet with the PLOS ONE style requirement.

2. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript.

We have removed “data not shown” from line 209 and added in a Supplementary Figure (Fig S5) showing that opticin does not bind to type 1 collagen fibrils.

Responses to reviewer’s comments

Their comments on opticin binding non altering morphology of the fibrillary structures are fascinating and based om measurements of fibril diameter, but is this sufficient to conclude on morphology?

Our previous work has shown that fibril diameter, morphology and molecular composition are interdependent (e.g. Blanschke et al. JBC 2000: 275: 10370-787), so we believe that conclusions can be made on morphology if opticin does not affect fibril diameter.

Opticin is present in vitreous and cartilage but so is e.g. biglycan, so why did the authors choose to address opticin binding only?

Whilst several members of the small leucine rich repeat proteoglycan (SLRP) family have been identified in vitreous and cartilage, we were particularly interested in studying opticin because in vitreous it appeared to be the major macromolecule associated with the collagen fibrils (Reardon et al 2000). Furthermore, we have shown that in vitreous opticin has anti-angiogenic properties which appear to relate to its collagen binding, so it was deemed important to investigate the binding of opticin to collagen fibrils. An additional reason is that, whilst there is previously published data showing the binding sites of class I and class II SLRPs on collagen fibrils, there is no published data on the binding of class III SLRPs.

To emphasise the first of these points (the others have already made in the text), we have added a sentence to the discussion, sentence 2, lines 179 -182, and a reference to a vitreous proteomics study which identified several SLRPs in vitreous.

“Whilst several SLRPs are present in vitreous [19], opticin is of particular interest because it was found to be a major component of a pool of macromolecules that strongly associated with vitreous collagen fibrils [1].”

Please correct "predominates" to "predominate" on line 64 and "collagen II, IX and IX" to "collagen II, IX and XI" on line 146

Predominates has been changed to predominate

We have not made any changes to line 146 as it is not clear what the reviewer would like us to do and as far as we can see it reads satisfactorily.

Some other minor corrections have been made to the text including incorrect reference numbers (these are highlighted).

Yours sincerely

Paul Bishop

Decision Letter 1

Dragana Nikitovic

24 Jul 2020

Analysis of opticin binding to collagen fibrils identifies a single binding site in the gap region and a high specificity towards thin heterotypic fibrils containing collagens II, and XI or V/XI.

PONE-D-20-16285R1

Dear Dr. Bishop,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Dragana Nikitovic, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Dragana Nikitovic

29 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-16285R1

Analysis of opticin binding to collagen fibrils identifies a single binding site in the gap region and a high specificity towards thin heterotypic fibrils containing collagens II, and XI or V/XI.

Dear Dr. Bishop:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Dragana Nikitovic

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Relationship of the negative stain pattern of vitreous collagen fibrils to the positive and negative stain patterns of collagen I.

    (A) and (B) show the positive and negative stain patterns, respectively, of collagen I fibrils. The 12 stain lines of the positive stain pattern (A) are labelled with the standard nomenclature [15]. The gap-overlap structure is indicated on the negative stain pattern [20] along with the axial locations of the N- and C-ends of the collagen molecules (B); the molecular polarity is indicated by the arrow. (C) shows the average negative stain pattern for the vitreous fibrils in the present study oriented and aligned with the collagen I stain patterns.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Solid-phase binding experiments with immobilised monomeric chick collagens.

    Opticin showed concentration-dependent binding to collagens II, IX and XI (heparin albumin was used as a positive control).

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Kinetics of in-vitro fibril formation.

    Turbidity measurements at 313 nm during fibrillogenesis with collagens II and XI or collagens II, IX and XI in the presence of varying concentrations of opticin.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Ultrastructure of fibrils formed in vitro in the presence of varying concentrations of opticin.

    Collagen fibrils reconstituted from mixtures of collagens II and XI (A,C,E) and collagens II, IX, and XI (B,D,F) followed by immunoelectron microscopy with opticin antibody and gold conjugated secondary antibody. There was no labelling in the absence of opticin (A,B); when the fibrils were reconstituted in the presence of 5 μg/ml of opticin, immunogold labelling was observed (C,D), and increased labelling was observed when reconstituted with 25 μg/ml of opticin (E,F), (bars 100 nm).

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Immunogold electron microscopy showing lack of binding of opticin to pre-formed reconstituted collagen 1 fibrils.

    Collagen I was purified in a native and fibrillogenesis-competent form from tarso-metatarsal tendons of 17-day-old chicken embryos as described previously [1]. Fibrils were formed in vitro then immunoelectron microscopy using opticin antibodies and gold-labelled secondary antibody was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Fibrils were incubated with 5 μg/ml of opticin (A), 50 μg/ml of opticin (B) or in control experiments an equal volume of storage buffer without opticin (C), (bars 200 nm).

    (TIF)

    S1 Text

    (DOCX)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES