Skip to main content
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho logoLink to Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho
. 2020 Aug 4;18(1):91–96. doi: 10.5327/Z1679443520200482

Cardiovascular risk, lifestyle and anthropometric status of rural workers in Pardo River Valley, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Risco cardiovascular, estilo de vida e composição corporal de trabalhadores rurais do Vale do Rio Pardo, RS

Patrik Nepomuceno 1, Carine Muniz dos Santos 1, William Vinicius Kleinpaul 1, Polliana Radtke dos Santos 1, Cassiane de Mendonça Braz 1, Maiara Helena Rusch 1, Ana Paula Pohl Duarte 2, Hildegard Hedwig Pohl 1
PMCID: PMC7413692  PMID: 32783009

ABSTRACT |

Background:

The state of health of rural workers is influenced by the living conditions to which they are subjected, including social, economic, technological and organizational aspects. Given the scarcity of studies on this population of workers, establishing their profile is necessary.

Objectives:

To analyze cardiovascular risk according to demographic factors and anthropometric status of rural workers under the Pardo River Valley Regional Development Council (COREDE-VRP).

Methods:

Cross-sectional analytical study with rural workers in five municipalities in the COREDE-VRP southern region. We administered a structured questionnaire for lifestyle socioeconomic information, physical activity and self-reported health. Anthropometric measurements, resting heart rate and electrocardiogram (ECG) were performed to analyze heart rate variability (HRV).

Results:

Women exhibited higher cardiovascular risk, which in turn did not differ as a function of age, marital status, socioeconomic status or lifestyle. We found a relationship between cardiovascular risk and anthropometric measurements, but not with cardiovascular variables.

Conclusion:

Women exhibited higher cardiovascular risk, which was not associated with marital status, socioeconomic status, alcohol use, smoking, sleep disorders or physical activity. Therefore, we emphasize the relationship between cardiovascular risk and anthropometric variables, as well as the lack of association with heart rate and autonomic imbalance.

Keywords |: rural workers, lifestyle, anthropometry

INTRODUCTION

The ongoing epidemics of noncommunicable diseases (NCD) is one of the main global causes of morbidity and mortality, the rate of deaths having considerable grown in the period from 2007 to 20171. NCD thus pose a significant public health problem, and represent 70% of causes of death in Brazil. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) stands out about among NCV; risk factors include smoking, alcohol use, excess weight, inadequate diet and physical inactivity2.

Physical inactivity has serious consequences, including illness3. Exercising contributes to control the body weight and reduces risk factors and the occurrence of diseases4. In Brazil, excess weight results from changes in dietary patterns and physical inactivity, and is one of the causes of NCD5.

Autonomic dysfunction is another risk factor for CVD, which can be assessed based on the heart rate variability (HRV)6. This condition interferes with the regulation of the cardiovascular system and is thus involved in and influences the course of CVD7,8.

Martins-Silva et al.9 found higher prevalence of general and central obesity among women in rural area s in the South region of Brazil compared to those living in cities. Rural populations are susceptible to diseases related to physical inactivity and exposure to toxics, while access to health services is difficult10. Thus the present study is justified as it sought to identify risk factors to health among rural workers in the interior of the state of Rio Grande, Brazil, who have poor access to health care and have been seldom targeted in scientific studies. Indeed, investigating cardiovascular risk factors among this population is necessary, particularly the relationship between lifestyle and anthropometric status, for which data are easily accessible and enable early detection of high cardiovascular risk.

The aim of the present study was to analyze cardiovascular risk according to demographic factors and anthropometric status of rural workers in the region covered by the Regional Development Council of Pardo River Valley (COREDE/VRP), Brazil.

METHODS

The present cross-sectional analytical study was performed with rural workers from five municipalities in the COREDE/VRP southern micro-region (Candelária, Encruzilhada do Sul, Passo do Sobrado, Rio Pardo and Vale Verde). It is part of project “Excess Weight Risk Factor Screening among Agricultural Workers by means of Novel Health Analytical and Information Technologies - Phase 3,” approved by the research ethics committee of University of Santa Cruz do Sul (Certificate of Presentation for Ethical Appraisal-CAAE: 78889317.1.0000.5343).

Participants were recruited by convenience sampling. We contacted all five municipal Technical Assistance and Rural Outreach Companies (Empresas de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural-EMATER) to intermediate our access to rural workers. Inclusion criteria were: having a rural job as main source of income, residing in the aforementioned towns, age above 18, and fasting and refraining from exercising on the day before data collection. We excluded subjects with any health problem that could hinder HRV testing.

The sample comprised 106 participants who provided informed consent. Data were collected during the first semester of 2018 at University of Santa Cruz, except for the participants from Encruzilhada do Sul and Rio Pardo, in which case for logistical reasons data collection was performed in facilities provided by EMATER and the Rural Worker Trade Union.

We administered a structured lifestyle questionnaire that included the following variables: age (in years), sex (male/female), socioeconomic status (A-B/C/D-E), marital status (married/other), number of household residents, smoking (no/smoker or ex-smoker), alcohol use frequency (weekly/monthly/less than once per month), physical activity (yes/no) and sleep disorders (yes/no).

Duly trained investigators collected anthropometric data, to wit, body weight and height, with analog scale and stadiometer. Next we calculated the body mass index (BMI) by dividing weight by height squared; the cut-off point was set to 25 kg/m2 (adequate/inadequate)11. Waist (WC) and hip circumference (HC) were measured with inelastic tape measure on the midpoint between the last rib and the iliac crest12 and on the greater trochanter13 respectively. WC was used to estimate cardiovascular risk, which was categorized following Lean et al.12 as normal/no risk or high/high risk. We next calculated the WC/HC ratio, categorized as adequate (low risk) or inadequate(medium, high or very high risk13). Neck circumference (NC) was measured on the cricothyroid cartilage with inelastic tape measure; values >37 cm (men) and >34 cm (women) were considered inadequate14.

HRV was tested following the recommendations by the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology15,16 using Polar V800 heart rate monitor15,16. Electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded (RR interval) for 10 minutes in a quiet room at room temperature 21-23ºC with the participants lying on supine position, awake, silent, without performing abrupt motions and breathing spontaneously.

The data were exported to software Kubios HRV Analysis 2.0 (Kubios, Kuopio, Finland). We performed frequency domain analysis relative to the most stable 5-minute record by means of spectral analysis of the low/high frequency power ratio (LF/HF) which represents the sympathetic to parasympathetic balance. Values 1.5-2.0 were considered adequate and those <1.5 or >2.0 inadequate. Heart rate (HR) <100 bpm was considered adequate and >100 bpm inadequate15.

The results were analyzed with software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables are presented in tables of absolute and relative frequencies, and numerical variables as mean and standard deviation. Normality was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Means were compared with Student’s t-test for independent samples (parametric) or the Mann-Whitney U test (nonparametric). Categorical variables were subjected to the χ2 test. The significance level was set to p<0.05.

RESULTS

More than half of the participants (54/106, 51%) were female, aged above 50 and belonged to socioeconomic category C (60%). Based on socioeconomic and lifestyle variables, the women exhibited statistically significant higher cardiovascular risk than the men (80% vs. 39%). We did not find difference in age p=0.081), marital status (p=0.112), socioeconomic category (0.327), alcohol use (p=0.248), smoking (p=0.061), sleep disorders (p=0.802) or physical activity (p=0.237) between the participants with or without cardiovascular risk (Table 1).

Table 1. Socioeconomic and lifestyle characteristics of rural workers with or without high cardiovascular risk, Santa Cruz do Sul, Brazil, 2019 (n=106).

Variables Cardiovascular risk p
No Yes
(n=43) (n=63)
n (%) n (%)
Age* 47.8±13.6 52.0±11.2 0.081
Sex
Female 11 (20) 43 (80) <0.001
Male 32 (61) 20 (39)
Marital status
Married 29 (36) 51 (64) 0.112
Other 14 (59) 12 (46)
Socioeconomic status
A-B 7 (28) 18 (72)
C 29 (45) 35 (55) 0.327
D-E 7 (41) 10 (59)
Alcohol use
Weekly 13 (50) 13 (50)
Monthly 7 (54) 6 (46) 0.248
Less than once per month 43 (41) 62 (59)
Smoking
Never 28 (35) 52 (65) 0.061
Smoker/ex-smoker 14 (56) 11 (44)
Sleep disorders
Yes 12 (39) 19 (61) 0.802
No 31 (41) 44 (59)
Physical activity
Yes 10 (53) 9 (47) 0.237
No 33 (38) 54 (62)

n: absolute frequency; %: relative frequency; *mean±standard deviation.

In turn, cardiovascular risk exhibited significant association with inadequate BMI (p<0.001), WC/HC (p<0.001) and NC (p<0.001) but not with HR (p=0.272) or autonomic imbalance (p=0.862) (Table 2).

Table 2. Anthropometric and cardiovascular characteristics of rural workers with or without high cardiovascular risk, Santa Cruz do Sul, Brazil, 2019 (n=106).

Variables Cardiovascular risk p
No (n=43) Yes (n=63)
n (%) n (%)
Body mass index
Adequate 26 (93) 2 (7) <0.001
Inadequate 17 (22) 78 (61)
Waist circumference/hip circumference
Adequate 20 (87) 3 (13) <0.001
Inadequate 23 (28) 60 (72)
Neck circumference
Adequate 23 (72) 9 (28) <0.001
Inadequate 20 (27) 54 (73)
Heart rate*
Adequate 36 (47) 41 (53) 0.272
Inadequate 7 (33) 14 (67)
LF/HF*
Adequate 8 (42) 11 (58) 0.862
Inadequate 35 (44) 44 (56)

n: absolute frequency; %: relative frequency; LF/HF: ratio between low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) spectral components; *eight missing.

DISCUSSION

The female participants exhibited significantly higher cardiovascular risk compared to the men (p<0.01). None of the other socioeconomic or lifestyle variables was associated with cardiovascular risk (p>0.05). We further found a relationship between cardiovascular risk and anthropometric variables p<0.001) but not with HR or autonomic imbalance (p>0.05).

A substantial migration of youths, especially women, to cities took place in recent decades in Brazil, resulting in a predominance of males and older adults in rural areas17. However, Sarmento et al.18 observe that attention should be paid to regional differences, since some production activities favor a predominance of men, while family farming contributes to keep women in rural areas. According to some studies, women predominate over men in the COREDE/VRP area19,20, which was also the case in the present study.

The socioeconomic profile we identified agrees with that reported by Silva et al.21, to wit, predominance of women above age 40, on average, and seven years of formal schooling (incomplete elementary school). However, data from the National Household Sample Survey from 2008, analyzed by Moreira et al.10, indicate that 58% of agricultural workers in Brazil are male and most are under age 40. In the study by Mori et al.22, the average age of family farmers in Alto Jacuí, Rio Grande do Sul, was 50 years old.

Biernat et al.23 analyzed leisure physical activity in a rural population and workers in Poland, and found that 49 and 66% respectively did not meet the recommendations by the World Health Organization for weekly physical activity24. These findings agree with ours, since most of the participants (82%) did not perform physical activity on a regular basis.

Felisbino-Mendes et al.25 reported excess weight in 34.9% of 863 analyzed rural workers, 25.6% among the men and 43.2% among the women, who were found to perform less physical activity. In the present study, the high rate of rural workers with excess weight who did not perform physical activity suggests that the physical demands of the job do not suffice to control the body weight, with consequent higher risk of NCD2.

In their study with 683 adults and 321 older adults, Cichoki et al.26 found that physical activity modulated cardiovascular risk. However, cardiovascular risk was lower only among individuals who performed moderate to vigorous physical activity regularly, while light intensity activity did not reduce risk. The high prevalence of cardiovascular risk in our study might be related to physical inactivity.

Poor access to health services is another characteristic of rural areas, especially as concerns prevention and health promotion actions, which thus might be considered as a factor of aggravation10. Following their study with citriculture workers in which they identified several occupational risk factors and diseases, Santos and Menta27 observe that lack of access to this type of actions implemented by the occupational health integrated care network is one further reason for distress among this population of workers.

Most of the analyzed population exhibited at least one cardiovascular risk factor, but autonomic imbalance - caused by diseases or medications with effects on the autonomic nervous system6 - did not have any relationship with the outcome. In turn, BMI, WC/HC and NC were associated with cardiovascular risk. As in ours, also in the study by Luz et al.28 with 790 farmers in Santa Maria de Jetibá, Espírito Santo, Brazil, BMI was associated (p=0.001) with cardiovascular risk. Those authors further found association between age and high WC and number of cardiovascular risk factors, two or more. In the study by Berhard et al.29 with 138 rural workers, intermediate and high cardiovascular risk predominated among those with overweight or obesity, but only among the females. Nevertheless, these authors call the attention to the relevance of BMI in the implementation of interventions to promote healthy lifestyles.

Our results indicate that health actions in rural areas are still precarious, and might also serve to channel attention and resources to prevention and health promotion interventions, particularly focused on the aspects we analyzed, i.e. reduction of anthropometric measurements and adoption of a healthy lifestyle.

The present study has some limitations, for instance those derived from convenience sampling, which was partially due to difficulties to access the target population. Then, while dietary habits are relevant for weight control and risk factor analysis, we did not investigate them. As positive aspects, we emphasize the fact we analyzed a seldom considered population of workers, as well as the relationship between cardiovascular risk and anthropometric measurements, which are reliable and easy to collect in the primary care setting and allow detecting abnormalities early. Our findings might also serve to ground prevention and health promotion actions targeting rural populations.

CONCLUSION

Women in rural areas exhibited higher cardiovascular risk by comparison to the men. We did not find any relationship between cardiovascular risk and marital status, socioeconomic status, alcohol use, smoking, sleep disorders or physical activity. In turn, cardiovascular risk was significantly associated with anthropometric variables (BMI, WC/HC, NC) but not with autonomic imbalance. Public policies should be formulated to prevent diseases and promote health among rural workers, particularly including interventions to change their anthropometric profile.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-CAPES) code 001, the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq) and the Rio Grande do Sul Research Support Foundation (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul-FAPERGS).

Footnotes

Funding: none

REFERENCES

  • 1.Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Seattle: IHME; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística . Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lourenço BS, Peres MAA, Porto IS, Oliveira RMP, Dutra VFD. Atividade física como uma estratégia terapêutica em saúde mental: revisão integrativa com implicação para o cuidado de enfermagem. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm. 2017;21(3):8–8. doi: 10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2016-0390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Halpern A, Mancini MC. Obesidade e síndrome metabólica para o clínico. São Paulo: Roca; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vaz DSS, Bennemann RM. Comportamento alimentar e hábito alimentar: uma revisão. Revista Uningá Review. 2014;20(1):108–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vanderlei LCM, Pastre CM, Hoshi RA, Carvalho TD, Godoy MF. Noções básicas de variabilidade da frequência cardíaca e sua aplicabilidade clínica. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2009;24(2):205–217. doi: 10.1590/S0102-76382009000200018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Soares AHG, Farah BQ, Cucato GG, Bastos-Filho CJ, Christofaro DGD, Vanderlei LCM, et al. O algoritmo utilizado para processamento de dados da variabilidade da frequência cardíaca é clinicamente relevante? Análise em adolescentes do gênero masculino. Einstein. 2016;14(2):196–201. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vinik AI. The conductor of the autonomic orchestra. Front Endocrinol. 2012;3:71–71. doi: 10.3389/2Ffendo.2012.00071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Martins-Silva T, Vaz JS, Mola CL, Assunção MCF, Tovo-Rodrigues L. Prevalence of obesity in rural and urban áreas in Brazil: National Health Survey, 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2019;22:e190049. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720190049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moreira JP, Oliveira BL, Muzi CD, Cunha CL, Brito AS, Luiz RR. Rural workers’ health in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2015;31(8):1698–1708. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00105114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Organização Mundial da Saúde . Obesidade: Prevenindo e controlando a epidemia global. São Paulo: Roca; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lean ME, Han TS, Morrison CE. Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. BMJ. 1995;311(6998):158–161. doi: 10.1136/2Fbmj.311.6998.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Heyward VH. Avaliação física e prescrição de exercício: técnicas avançadas. 6. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Frizon V, Boscaini C. Circunferência do pescoço, fatores de risco para doenças cardiovasculares e consumo alimentar. Rev Bras Cardiol. 2013;26(6):426–434. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of Pacing Electrophysiology Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation. 1996;93(5):1043–1065. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Giles D, Draper N, Neil W. Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor to measure RR intervals at rest. Eur J App Physiol. 2016;116:563–571. doi: 10.1007/2Fs00421-015-3303-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Staduto JAR, Nascimento CA, Souza M. Ocupações e renda das mulheres e homens no rural do estado do Paraná, Brasil: uma perspectiva de gênero. Cuad Desarro Rural. 2013;10(72):91–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sarmento RA, Moraes RM, Viana RTP, Pessoa VM, Carneiro FF. Determinantes socioambientais e saúde: o Brasil rural versus o Brasil urbano. Tempus Actas Saúde Coletiva. 2015;9(2):221–235. doi: 10.18569/tempus.v9i2.1718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Glier C, Reuter ÉM, Santos PR, Corbellini VA, Pohl HH, Reckziegel MB. Presença de dislipidemia e uso de estatinas em trabalhadores da agroindústria e produtores rurais: estudo preliminar. Rev Jovens Pesquisadores. 2014;4(3):28–37. doi: 10.17058/rjp.v4i3.4513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pohl HH, Arnold EF, Dummel KL, Cerentini TM, Reuter ÉM, Reckziegel MB. Indicadores antropométricos e fatores de risco cardiovascular em trabalhadores rurais. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2018;24(1):64–68. doi: 10.1590/1517-869220182401158030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Silva MR, Ferretti F, Lutinski JA. Dor lombar, flexibilidade muscular e relação com o nível de atividade física de trabalhadores rurais. Saúde Debate. 2017;41(112):183–194. doi: 10.1590/0103-1104201711215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mori NC, Horn RC, Oliveira C, Leal PAP, Golle DP, Koefender J, et al. Alterações bioquímicas e toxicológicas de agricultores familiares da região do Alto Jacuí, Rio Grande do Sul. Sci Med. 2015;25(3) doi: 10.15448/1980-6108.2015.3.20999. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Biernat E, Bartkiewicz P, Buchholtz S. Are Structural Changes in Polish Rural Areas Fostering Leisure-Time Physical Activity? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(4):372–372. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.World Health Organization . Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. World Health Organization; 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Felisbino-Mendes MS, Jansen AK, Gomes CS, Velásquez-Meléndez G. Avaliação dos fatores de risco cardiovasculares em uma população rural brasileira. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014;30(6):1183–1194. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00103213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cichocki M, Fernandes KP, Castro-Alves DC, Gomes MVM. Atividade física e modulação do risco cardiovascular. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2017;23(1):21–25. doi: 10.1590/1517-869220172301159475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Santos AC, Menta SA. Refletindo a interface entre trabalho rural e saúde mental dos trabalhadores da citricultura. Cad Ter Ocup UFSCar. 2016;24(4):765–775. doi: 10.4322/0104-4931.ctoAO0718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Luz TC, Cattafesta M, Petarli GB, Meneghetti JP, Zandonade E, Bezerra OMPA, et al. Fatores de risco cardiovascular em uma população rural Brasileira. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2019 doi: 10.1590/1413-812320202510.36022018. [Internet] Available at: http://www.cienciaesaudecoletiva.com.br/artigos/fatores-de-risco-cardiovascular-em-uma-populacao-rural-brasileira/17149?id=17149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bernhard JC, Dummel KL, Reuter E, Reckziegel MB, Pohl HH. Cardiovascular risk in rural workers and its relation with body mass index. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018;62(1):72–78. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho are provided here courtesy of Associação Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho

RESOURCES