Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2020 Jul 21;117(31):18264–18271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006177117

Exoplanet secondary atmosphere loss and revival

Edwin S Kite a,1, Megan N Barnett a
PMCID: PMC7414166  PMID: 32694204

Significance

Earth and Venus have significant atmospheres, but Mercury does not. Thousands of exoplanets are known, but we know almost nothing about rocky exoplanet atmospheres. Many rocky exoplanets were formed by a sub-Neptune-to-super-Earth conversion process during which planets lose most of their H2-rich (primary) atmospheres and are reduced in volume by a factor of >2. Does such a gas-rich adolescence increase or decrease the likelihood that super-Earths will subsequently exhibit a H2-poor (secondary) atmosphere? We show that secondary atmospheres exsolved from the magma ocean are unlikely to be retained by super-Earths, but it is possible for volcanic outgassing to revive super-Earth atmospheres. For M-dwarf planetary systems, super-Earths that have atmospheres close to the star likely were formed with abundant volatiles.

Keywords: exoplanets, atmospheric evolution, planetary science

Abstract

The next step on the path toward another Earth is to find atmospheres similar to those of Earth and Venus—high–molecular-weight (secondary) atmospheres—on rocky exoplanets. Many rocky exoplanets are born with thick (>10 kbar) H2-dominated atmospheres but subsequently lose their H2; this process has no known Solar System analog. We study the consequences of early loss of a thick H2 atmosphere for subsequent occurrence of a high–molecular-weight atmosphere using a simple model of atmosphere evolution (including atmosphere loss to space, magma ocean crystallization, and volcanic outgassing). We also calculate atmosphere survival for rocky worlds that start with no H2. Our results imply that most rocky exoplanets orbiting closer to their star than the habitable zone that were formed with thick H2-dominated atmospheres lack high–molecular-weight atmospheres today. During early magma ocean crystallization, high–molecular-weight species usually do not form long-lived high–molecular-weight atmospheres; instead, they are lost to space alongside H2. This early volatile depletion also makes it more difficult for later volcanic outgassing to revive the atmosphere. However, atmospheres should persist on worlds that start with abundant volatiles (for example, water worlds). Our results imply that in order to find high–molecular-weight atmospheres on warm exoplanets orbiting M-stars, we should target worlds that formed H2-poor, that have anomalously large radii, or that orbit less active stars.


The Solar System has three planets—Earth, Venus, and Mars—that have atmospheres derived from H2-free solids (secondary atmospheres), and four giant planets whose atmospheres are derived from protoplanetary nebula gas (H2-dominated primary atmospheres) (1, 2). However, this clean separation in process and outcome is apparently unrepresentative of the known exoplanets.

The two most common types of known exoplanet, the rocky super-Earth–sized planets (planet radius Rpl < 1.6 R, where “⊕” is the Earth symbol, planet density ρpl > 4 g/cc; “super-Earths”) and the gas-shrouded sub-Neptunes (Rpl = 2 to 3 R), are divided by a valley in (planet radius)–(orbital period) space in which planets are less common (Fig. 1) (e.g., ref. 3). The radius valley can be understood if, and only if, a substantial fraction of planets that are born with thick (>10 kbar) H2-dominated primary atmospheres lose those atmospheres and shrink in radius to become rocky super-Earths (4). This radius-shrinking process, which carves out the radius valley, may be the way that most super-Earths form. There is no evidence that Earth and Venus underwent this process, and primary atmospheres are not thought to have contributed to the origin of major volatile elements in Earth (5). Both Venus and Earth have secondary volatile envelopes (composed of solid-derived volatiles, including H2O and CO2) that are much less massive than the atmospheres of sub-Neptunes. Large surface reservoirs of H2O, C species, and N species are essential to life on Earth and to Earth’s habitable climate (6, 7).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The exoplanet abundance histogram (gray band, for orbital periods <100 d, corrected for detection biases; from ref. 3). Two classes of small exoplanet are seen: volatile-rich sub-Neptunes and rocky super-Earth–sized exoplanets. Sub-Neptune-to-super-Earth conversion is implied by the data and may be the way that most super-Earths form.

Does forming with a thick primary atmosphere (sub-Neptune) but ending up as a rocky super-Earth favor the rocky planet ending up with a secondary atmosphere? Do primary atmospheres, in dying, shield high–molecular-weight species from loss during the early era of atmosphere-stripping impacts and intense stellar activity, allowing those constituents to later form a secondary atmosphere? Or does the light (H2-dominated) and transient primary atmosphere drag away the higher–molecular-weight species? Getting physical insight into the transition from primary to secondary atmospheres is particularly important for rocky exoplanets that are too hot for life. Hot rocky exoplanets are the highest signal/noise rocky targets for upcoming missions such as James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) (8) and so will be the most useful for checking our understanding of this atmospheric transition process.

Secondary atmospheres are central to the exoplanet exploration strategy (9, 10). Previous work on the hypothesis that primary atmospheres played a role in forming secondary atmospheres includes that of Eucken in the 1940s (11), Urey (12), Cameron and coworkers (e.g., ref. 13), Sasaki (14), and Ozima and Zahnle (15). Secondary atmosphere formation on exoplanets in the absence of a primary atmosphere has been investigated by, e.g., Elkins-Tanton and Seager (16), Dorn et al. (17), and references therein.

Gas Survival during Planetary Volume Reduction.

During sub-Neptune-to-super-Earth conversion, we suppose the planet contains both nebular-derived H2 and also high-μ species (derived from the planet-forming solid materials) that could form a secondary atmosphere—if retained. Retention of volatiles is controlled by atmospheric loss and atmosphere-interior exchange (Fig. 2). For both sub-Neptunes and super-Earths, silicates (both magma and solid rock) apparently make up most of the planet’s mass (e.g., refs. 18 and 19).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Processes (italics) and reservoirs (upright font) in our model. Atmosphere-interior exchange is central to the transition from primary to secondary atmospheres. Timescales are approximate.

Atmosphere loss is more difficult for high–molecular-weight volatiles than for H2 because higher–molecular-weight volatiles such as H2O are more easily shielded within the silicate interior and are also more resistant to escape.

This can be understood as follows. First, a basic control on atmosphere loss is the ratio, λ, of gravitational binding energy to thermal energy:

λ=(μ/kTua)(GMpl/(R+z))2.3μ(104K/Tua)(Mpl/6M)/((R+z)/2R), [1]

where μ is molecular mass, k is Boltzmann’s constant, Tua is upper-atmosphere temperature, G is the gravitational constant, Mpl is planet mass, R is the radius of the silicate planet, and z is atmosphere thickness. When λ ≲ 2, the upper atmosphere flows out to space at a rate potentially limited only by the energy available from upper-atmosphere absorption of light from the star (20). If the upper atmosphere absorbs 100 W/m2 of light from the star, the upper limit on loss is ∼1,000 bars/My. This hydrodynamic outflow ejects the tenuous upper atmosphere at high speed, but the dense lower atmosphere remains close to hydrostatic equilibrium. When λ > 10, the hydrodynamic outflow shuts down. For primary atmospheres, the mean molecular weight μavg ∼ 2 Da (H2), while for secondary atmospheres, μavg is ≳10× higher favoring secondary atmosphere retention. Moreover, many secondary-atmosphere constituents (e.g., CO2) are much more effective coolants than H2, so for secondary atmospheres Tua is lower (e.g., refs. 21 and 22). Atmospheric thickness z is also smaller for high-μavg atmospheres due to their smaller scale height, raising λ. For all atmospheres, proximity to the star increases Tua (lowering λ) and also increases the upper atmosphere outflow rate when the λ > 2 condition is satisfied. Moreover, closer to the star impacts occur at higher velocities that are more erosive (23). Thus, we expect massive worlds far from the star to retain atmospheres and low-mass worlds closer to the star to lose them (10). This expectation, while physically valid, offers little guidance as to whether or not super-Earths will have atmospheres. To go further, we need to consider the effect of evolving atmospheric composition on loss rate (Eq. 1) and also track the shielding of volatiles within silicates (magma oceans and solid rock) (Fig. 2).

The atmospheres of young sub-Neptunes are underlain by magma oceans (e.g., ref. 24 and SI Appendix, Fig. S1). Equilibrium partitioning of a volatile i between the atmosphere (where it is vulnerable to escape) and the magma ocean (where it is shielded from escape) is given by the following:

ci=ei+pisimmagma+otherreservoirs=ei+[(ei/Amai)gmai(μavg/μi)]simmagma+otherreservoirs, [2]

where ci is the total inventory of the volatile, ei is the mass in the atmosphere, pi is the partial pressure of i at the magma–atmosphere interface, Amai (and gmai) are the area of (and gravitational acceleration at) the magma–atmosphere interface, μavg is the mean μ of the atmosphere, si is the solubility coefficient (mass fraction pascal−1) of the volatile in the magma, and mmagma is the mass of liquid in the magma ocean. Solubility in magma is higher for many secondary-atmosphere constituents (e.g., CH4, H2S, H2O) than for H2. When the atmosphere contains both H2 and a more-soluble, high-μ constituent, the H2 takes the brunt of atmosphere loss processes that might otherwise remove the high-μ species. Differential solubility also protects the more-soluble species from impact shock (25). Other reservoirs include volatiles stored in the crystal phase. This is an unimportant reservoir early on when the planet has a massive magma ocean, but becomes important later, because these volatiles can be released by volcanic degassing. We neglect volatiles that are stored in the iron core because they do not contribute to the observable atmosphere.

Atmospheric loss typically drives magma ocean crystallization (SI Appendix, Fig. S1) (except for planets that either orbit uncommonly close to their star, or undergo strong tidal heating, bare-rock planets do not have a global molten-rock layer). The greenhouse effect from the atmosphere keeps the magma ocean liquid for longer, which delays partitioning of the volatile into crystals. This partitioning is described by the following:

Xxtl=DiXi, [3]

where Xxtl is the concentration of i in the crystal phase, Di is a solid-melt distribution coefficient/partition coefficient, and Xi is the concentration of i in the magma. Crystallization enriches the residual melt in volatiles (i.e., Di << 1; e.g., ref. 26).

One last effect can aid retention of high–molecular-weight volatiles. If outflow to space is slow, then the high-μ species can sink back toward the planet (diffusive separation driven by buoyancy) (e.g., refs. 27 and 28 and SI Appendix, section 1g).

Eqs. 13 open two paths from a primary to a secondary atmosphere. A secondary atmosphere can be exsolved as the magma ocean crystallizes. Alternatively, the atmosphere can be revived by volcanic degassing long after the mantle has almost entirely solidified (Fig. 2). We explore these paths below.

Model of the Transition from Primary to Secondary Atmospheres.

We model the effect of the loss of a thick H2-dominated atmosphere on the retention (or loss) of a hypothetical volatile, s. Species s has molecular mass 30 Da, which is within a factor of <1.5 of the molecular mass of all known major secondary-atmosphere constituents. In the uppermost atmosphere, species s is modeled to split into fragments of mass 15 Da for the purpose of calculating whether or not s is effectively entrained by escaping H. We assume that reactions between s and H2 do not affect the mass inventory of either species; in effect, s is chemically inert. We assume that deviations from thermochemical equilibrium driven by photochemistry in the uppermost atmosphere are reset to thermochemical equilibrium at the high temperature and pressure of the magma–atmosphere interface. While idealized, the model includes many effects that have not previously been incorporated into a model of atmosphere loss, such as a realistic rock melting curve, differential solubility effects, etc. (SI Appendix).

Planet equilibrium temperature Teq (in kelvin), for zero planet albedo, is given by the following:

Teq=278(F/F)1/4, [4]

where F is insolation (in watts per square meter) and the Sun’s insolation at Earth’s orbit, F, is 1,361 W/m2. Upper-atmosphere temperatures Tua > Teq are essential for a super-Earth atmosphere to flow out to space: This is possible because upper atmospheres efficiently absorb light at wavelength ≲100 nm, but do not readily reemit this light.

We adopt sH2 = 2 × 10−12 Pa−1 (ref. 29 and SI Appendix, section 1e), which for initial atmospheric pressure Patm, init = 50 kbar gives a total mass of H2 (atmosphere plus dissolved-in-magma) of 7 × 1023 kg (2% of planet mass). We neglect He, so our model primary atmosphere is slightly more soluble in magma and has a slightly lower molecular weight than in reality. We assume the crystal-melt partition coefficients are DH2 = 0 (for simplicity) and Ds = 0.02 (SI Appendix, section 1f). Sub-Neptunes have a global shell of magma that freezes during conversion to a super-Earth (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). Planet thermal structure (below the photosphere, which is isothermal by assumption) is as follows (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). The temperature at the top of the magma ocean, Tmai, is given by the atmosphere adiabat:

(Tmai/TRCB)=(Patm/PRCB)(γ1)/γ, [5]

where TRCB is the temperature at the radiative–convective boundary within the atmosphere (RCB), PRCB is the pressure at the RCB, and γ is the adiabatic index. We assume TRCB/Teq = 1, that the temperature jump at the magma–atmosphere interface is small, and that the magma ocean is isentropic. (If TRCB/Teq = 1.5 in a 1000 K orbit, then the planet cooling timescale is only <1 ky). This basic model absorbs the planet cooling rate and the radiative opacity of the atmosphere into a single parameter, PRCB (SI Appendix, section 1c); for more sophisticated models, see, e.g., ref. 30. As Patm decreases, Tmai cools, and the magma crystallizes. Crystallization starts at great depth and the crystallization front sweeps slowly upward (e.g., ref. 26). Volatiles enriched near the crystallization front due to the low solubility of volatiles in crystals will be stirred by fast magma currents (speed up to 10 m s−1; ref. 31) to the near surface, where they form bubbles that pop and add gas to the atmosphere. Stirring and bubbling can degas the mantle down to at least ∼100-GPa depths (e.g., refs. 31 and 32 and references therein). A smaller portion of s will go into the crystals. This portion is shielded within the rock and available for later volcanic outgassing. We do not include liquid volatiles (e.g., clouds) or fluid–fluid immiscibility. We emphasize results for Teq < 1150 K, cold enough for silicates to condense (33). The model is intended for super-Earths too hot for life.

Volcanic outgassing after the magma ocean has completely crystallized is guided by the results of ref. 34 (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 and section 1h).

We approximate diffusive separation of H2 and heavy gases as zero during sub-Neptune-to-super-Earth conversion. During conversion, escape proceeds too quickly for the s to settle out (28) (SI Appendix, section 1g). On worlds that are cool enough for life, diffusive separation is important (SI Appendix, section 1g). On worlds that are cool enough for life, diffusive separation can allow high-μ species to be retained in the atmosphere while H escapes, including in cases where s is a reducing species that is dissociated into easily escaping H plus a heavy atom (e.g., H2O → 2H + O; ref. 35). The secondary atmospheres that may be exsolved as the magma ocean crystallizes form more quickly (36) than volcanically outgassed atmospheres. Volcanically outgassed atmospheres are produced on solid-state mantle homogenization timescales (τ > 1 Gy; e.g., refs. 37 and 38). Because volcanic degassing of terrestrial planets is so slow/inefficient (e.g., ref. 39), we consider magma-ocean exsolution separately from volcanic outgassing. Specifically, we set rerelease of s from the solid mantle to zero so long as the exsolved atmosphere is present. With these approximations, for a given insolation L, planet mass Mpl, initial dose of s, and Patm at which that dose is applied, the output depends on how much atmosphere has been removed, but not on the speed (or process) of removal. In other words, the equations are time independent.

The Small Planet Evolution Sequence.

We first model atmospheric evolution during magma ocean crystallization (Figs. 3 and 4). We show results for 6 M (∼1.6 R), corresponding to the largest (and therefore highest signal/noise) planets that commonly have densities consistent with loss of all H2 (40). We use a total mass of high-μ volatile (Ms) = 3 × 1021 kg. This corresponds to the near-surface C inventory of Earth and Venus, scaled up to 6 M (and it is 2× the mass of Earth’s ocean).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The small planet evolution sequence, for 6 M. The black triangles correspond to total initial inventory of high-μ species. (A) Solubility of high-μ species in magma (ss) = 10−11 Pa−1, insolation normalized to Earth’s insolation (F/F) = 240 (planet equilibrium temperature 1095 K). (B) ss = 10−11 Pa−1, F/F = 3 (planet equilibrium temperature = 360 K). (C) ss = 10−9 Pa−1, F/F = 240. (D) ss = 10−9 Pa−1, F/F = 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

(A) How the mass of volatiles shielded within the solid mantle depends on F and ss. (B) How atmospheric mean molecular weight (after crystallization of the magma ocean is complete) depends on F and ss.

We drive the model by decreasing Patm. In Fig. 3, as PH2 (blue dashed lines) falls, the magma ocean crystallizes, so that remaining volatiles go into the atmosphere (green), go into the solid mantle (maroon), or escape to space (black). We find that the main controls on the transition on exoplanets from primary to secondary atmospheres are F and the solubility (ss) of the high-μ atmosphere constituent.

Fig. 3A shows a case with low ss (10−11 Pa−1), for a planet close to its host star (F/F = 240; Teq = 1100 K; typical for Kepler super-Earths). The magma ocean stays fully liquid until the atmospheric mass is reduced by 90%. (Release of dissolved-in-magma H2 by bubbling is a negative feedback on atmospheric loss.) Crystallization begins at Patm = 2 kbar and completes at ∼100 bars. s is passively entrained (either as atoms or molecules) in the escaping H2. We stop the run at Patm = 1 bar, so we do not track the removal of the last bit of the exsolved atmosphere. In this limit of small ss, only 6 × 1016 kg × (ss/10−11 Pa−1) × (Ds/0.02) is shielded within the solid mantle. Most of the s is lost to space before crystallization begins. The outcome is a bare rock with a volatile-starved solid mantle, incapable of much volcanic outgassing.

Fig. 3B shows results for the same ss as in Fig. 3A and a cooler orbit (F/F = 3, Teq = 370 K, intermediate between Mercury and Venus in our Solar System). In the cooler orbit, some crystals are present initially. With no fully liquid stage, crystallization can start to shield s within crystals as soon as atmospheric loss starts. The s available for later volcanic outgassing in the cooler orbit case is 50 times greater.

Raising ss to 10−9 Pa−1 (equivalent to 1 wt% solubility for 100 bars of partial pressure) favors secondary atmosphere occurrence (Fig. 3 C and D). More s is dissolved in the magma, and so more s partitions (during crystallization) into the rock, where it is shielded. Because s is much more soluble in the magma than H2, very little s is initially in the atmosphere. Therefore, relatively little s is carried away to space during H2 removal and so more s is available for exsolution during the final crystallization of the magma ocean. This can create a high-μavg atmosphere, which is easier to retain. Protection by differential solubility is enhanced by the hot orbit (L/L = 240; Fig. 3C) as opposed to the cool orbit (L/L = 3; Fig. 3D), because the magma ocean is long-lived for this case, and so the volatiles are safely dissolved for longer. As a result, in the hot orbit case, enough high-μ species remain at final magma ocean crystallization to create an atmosphere with high-μavg (the green line crosses the blue line in Fig. 3C). Such a high-μavg atmosphere is easier to retain. The small amount of H2 that remains in the atmosphere at this point can be lost by diffusion-limited escape.

Together, F and ss have strong effects on the chance of secondary atmosphere occurrence. Volatiles that are shielded within rock are available for late volcanic outgassing. For high ss, the mass of shielded volatiles tends toward the product of the initial inventory of s and the solid–liquid partition coefficient Ds (Fig. 4A). This is because almost all of the s is in the magma until the magma ocean has almost completely crystallized. The effect of F/F on the mass of shielded volatiles is relatively modest for ss > 3 × 10−11 Pa−1. For F/F ≤ 25 and low ss < (μsH2)sH2, the amount of the high–molecular-weight species that is shielded within rock is proportional to ss. For low ss, the mass of shielded volatiles decreases rapidly for hot orbits. In hot orbits, the H wind can carry away s for a long time before the magma ocean cools enough for solidification (and shielding).

When μavg is high, loss to space is less likely (Eq. 1 and surrounding discussion). Fig. 4B shows how atmospheric μavg (after crystallization of the magma ocean is complete) depends on F and ss. For ss > 10−11 Pa−1, a greater fraction of the ss is stored in the magma than is H2. As a result, the atmosphere becomes more s-rich as the magma ocean crystallizes. The enrichment is especially strong for hot orbits, because for hot orbits there is more s available to be exsolved: Less s has escaped to space before crystallization completes. For ss < 10−11 Pa−1, most of the s is stored in the atmosphere, and so the atmospheric s mixing ratio is near-constant during atmosphere loss. [At F/F < 3, diffusive separation favors high-μavg atmospheres (SI Appendix, section 1g).]

Cooler orbits favor volcanic outgassing but hotter orbits permit exsolved high–molecular-weight atmospheres. To determine which effect is more important for the chance of seeing a secondary atmosphere on a super-Earth, we turn to a time-dependent model.

Where Are Planets Today on the Small Planet Evolution Sequence?

We map planet evolution onto time and host-star mass (Fig. 5). The atmosphere loss that converts sub-Neptunes into super-Earths could be driven by photoevaporation, impact erosion, or accretion energy (e.g., refs. 19, 23, and 41). Here, we consider photoevaporation due to X-ray and extreme UV flux (XUV). FXUV plateaus at ∼10−3 × total F for planets around young stars, switching to a power-law decay at <0.1 Gy for solar-mass stars (FXUV = 3 × 10−6 F at Earth today) (SI Appendix, section 1a). The plateau of high FXUV/F is longer at red dwarf (M) stars (≥0.3 Gy long for ≤0.5 M). Therefore, we expect that (for a given Teq) planets orbiting M-stars will have lost more atmosphere (e.g., ref. 42).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Time-dependent results for planets orbiting a solar-mass star. (SI Appendix, Fig. S6 shows the results for a 0.3 M star.) (A) Atmospheric pressure vs. time for ss = 10−9 Pa−1. (From Top to Bottom) F/F = {49, 283, 347, 422, 720}, corresponding to planet equilibrium temperature (Teq) = {735, 1140, 1200, 1275, 1440} K. (B) As A, but for ss = 10−11 Pa−1.

FXUV drives atmospheric loss (rate dMatm/dt) (SI Appendix, section 1b). Nebula-composition atmospheres do not cool efficiently, leading to high Tua that favors hydrodynamic escape (43). For nebular-composition atmospheres, we use the following:

dMatm/dt=εRpl(R+z(t))2FXUV/(GMpl), [6]

where ε is an efficiency factor. For high-μ atmospheres, we adopt the loss fluxes of a CO2 atmosphere (44) as an example of a strong coolant. The model of ref. 44 (and ref. 45) includes dissociation of CO2 under high XUV levels, and the escaping material is atomic C and O. The model of ref. 44 predicts low ε for CO2 atmospheres, and negligible hydrodynamic escape for FXUV < 0.6 W⋅m−2 (=150× the value on Earth today) (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). At intermediate compositions, we interpolate using a logistic function (SI Appendix, section 1b).

Fig. 5 shows atmosphere thickness vs. time for a solar-mass star and Patm, init = 50 kbar. High-μavg atmospheres can only persist at a narrow range of F. [A similar pattern is seen for low-mass stars (SI Appendix, Fig. S6).] Worlds far from the star receive a low XUV flux and stay as sub-Neptunes. Worlds in hotter orbits lose their atmospheres completely. They may undergo a rapid increase in μavg (blue to yellow in Fig. 5A), but the resulting high-μavg atmosphere is almost always short-lived. Why is this? According to the pure-CO2 model of ref. 44, dMatm/dt for high–molecular-weight atmospheres on super-Earths has a threshold at ∼150 × FXUV/FXUV,⊕, below which loss is much slower. However, in most cases the primary atmosphere is lost when FXUV is still very high, so any exsolved secondary atmosphere is swiftly lost. For low ss, the atmosphere has a composition that is always H2-dominated (by number), so exsolved high-μ species are lost in the H wind (Fig. 5B).

We conclude that exsolved atmospheres are rare. This conclusion is robust because we use parameters that are favorable for an exsolved atmosphere. For example, we use a high solubility-in-magma for the high-μ species, but our high-μ escape-to-space parameterization is for a species (CO2) whose solubility-in-magma is low.

Revival of Secondary Atmospheres by Volcanic Outgassing.

Volcanic outgassing can regenerate the atmosphere of a planet. We do not know whether or not this process actually occurs on rocky exoplanets. We use a basic model to explore this process. We use a time-dependent rate-of-volcanism model for super-Earths (ref. 34 and SI Appendix, section 1h) that is tuned to the rate of CO2 release at Earth’s midocean ridges (12 ± 2 bars/Gy; ref. 46). The rate of outgassing is adjusted downward to account for loss of volatiles during sub-Neptune-to-super-Earth conversion, assuming 50% of worlds have ss = 10−9 Pa−1, and 50% of worlds have ss = 10−11 Pa−1. We neglect atmosphere reuptake to form minerals (e.g., ref. 47), because our focus is on worlds that are too hot for aqueous weathering. This omission is conservative relative to our conclusion that volcanically outgassed atmospheres on hot rocky exoplanets are uncommon. Fig. 6 (gray curve) outlines the region within which, in our model, volcanic outgassing will build up a secondary atmosphere. The line of revival sweeps toward the star over time, because the rate of volcanic degassing falls off more slowly with time than does the star’s XUV flux. Volcanic revival of the atmosphere is difficult for planets around M = 0.3 M stars, but easier for rocky planets around solar-mass stars. The results are sensitive to changes in ss, and to the choice of XUV flux models (SI Appendix, Figs. S9–S11 and S17). SI Appendix, Fig. S17 also shows results for volcanism at a constant Earth-scaled outgassing rate. Fig. 6 also shows the atmosphere presence/absence line for rocky worlds that start with no H2, and with all high–molecular-weight volatiles in the atmosphere (red curves). Such “intrinsically rocky” worlds retain residual secondary atmospheres over a wider range of conditions than do worlds that start as sub-Neptunes. The line of atmosphere loss for these residual atmospheres sweeps further away from the star with time.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Secondary atmosphere presence/absence model output for 6 M (higher planet mass favors atmosphere retention). The red lines and gray lines show atmosphere presence/absence contours for two different scenarios. The red lines show atmosphere retention thresholds after 3.0 Gy for the case where all volatiles are in the atmosphere initially and there is no primary atmosphere; the 16th and 84th percentiles are shown, for varying XUV flux (by ±0.4 dex, 1 σ; ref. 48) relative to the baseline model following the results of refs. 49 and 50 (SI Appendix, section 1a). The red lines move away from the star over time (red arrows). The gray lines show the 16th and 84th percentiles for exhibiting an atmosphere after 3.0 Gy for the case where volcanic outgassing rebuilds the atmosphere from a bare-rock state. The solid gray lines are for stagnant-lid tectonics, and the dashed gray lines are for plate tectonics. The lines of atmospheric revival sweep toward the star over time (gray arrows) because the rate of volcanic degassing falls off more slowly with time than does the star’s XUV flux. In each case, the atmosphere/no-atmosphere threshold is 1 bar. The black symbols show known planets that may be tested for atmospheres using JWST (51). For any individual planet, star-specific XUV-flux estimates, star age, and the planet’s mass, should be combined to make a more accurate estimate than is possible using this overview diagram. SI Appendix, Figs. S8, S16, and S17 show further details.

Discussion

Our model results are sensitive to the rate of XUV-driven mass loss. The XUV flux of young solar-mass stars varies between stars of similar age by a factor of 3 to 10 (e.g., ref. 52). Stars with low XUV flux are more likely to host planets with atmospheres (SI Appendix, Fig. S11). Escape of N2 or H2O is likely faster than the ref. 44 loss rate estimate (which is for pure-CO2 atmospheres) that is used in our model (based on the results of refs. 22 and 53). Improved knowledge of escape rate will require more escape rate data and XUV flux data (e.g., refs. 54 and 55). Currently, XUV flux data as a function of star mass and star age are limited, and upcoming space missions such as SPARCS will gather more data (55, 56).

Our model considers only thermal loss. However, solar wind erosion can remove atmospheres that are already thin (57). A possible example is Mars over the last ∼4 Ga. Planetary dynamos can under some circumstances suppress solar-wind erosion (e.g., ref. 58). Mars had a dynamo prior to 4 Gya, and Earth (but not Venus) has one today.

Solubility of gas in magma varies between species. Carbon-bearing volatile species are very insoluble in magma. H2O’s solubility in basaltic magma at H2O partial pressure 0.03 GPa is ∼2 wt%; linearizing, this gives solubility ss = 7 × 10−10 Pa−1 (e.g., ref. 59). HCl is even more soluble in magma than H2O (60), so a Cl-rich initial composition would have a greater chance of forming an exsolved high-μ atmosphere, although we still predict it would be short-lived. The effects on atmosphere prevalence of 100-fold reduction in solubility are shown in SI Appendix, Figs. S9–S11. Better constraints on solubility at T > 2000 K are desirable (e.g., ref. 61).

Volcanism on super-Earths should wane over gigayears, according to models. We need more data to test these models. In models, the rate of decrease of volcanism depends on whether or not the planet has plate tectonics, on planet mass, and on mantle composition (e.g., refs. 17 and 6264 and SI Appendix). Two effects, of uncertain relative importance, are ignored in our volcanism model. The first is a buffering effect: If the mantle is volatile-rich, then magma is produced more easily (65), but if the mantle is volatile-poor, then the melt rate is reduced (reducing the rate of volatile loss). The second is a potential fine-tuning issue: If volcanic degassing is very rapid, then volatiles will be released from the protective custody of the mantle before atmosphere loss process have lost their bite.

Overall, our choices of Mpl, Ds, and ss tend to favor the existence of volcanically outgassed atmospheres. Even with these choices, atmospheres are usually not stable for planets at Teq > 500 K around M-stars. So, our conclusions are broadly unfavorable for atmospheres on rocky exoplanets at Teq > 500 K around M-stars. However, this conclusion is moderated by the possibility (discussed next) that worlds with abundant H2O exist close to the star.

Observational Tests.

Atmospheres on rocky exoplanets can now be detected (e.g., refs. 66 and 67). Theory predicts that retaining an atmosphere should be harder on planets orbiting low-mass stars, and the present study extends that prediction to super-Earths that form as sub-Neptunes. A test of this theory would have major implications for habitable zone planets. If this prediction fails, that would suggest that M-star rocky exoplanets formed more volatile-rich than rocky exoplanets orbiting Sun-like stars (68).

It is possible that some planets form with more volatiles than can be removed by loss processes (69). Some models predict formation of hot Super-Earths with 1 to 30 wt% H2O, either by accretion of volatile-rich objects (for example, extrasolar analogs to CI/CM chondrites), or by planet migration (e.g., refs. 69 and 70). Such volatile-rich worlds are hard to distinguish from bare-rock planets using current data. XUV-driven loss can remove at most a few wt% of an M = 6 M planet’s mass for Teq < 1000 K. Our model implies that a planet in the “no atmosphere” zone of Fig. 6 with a JWST detection of H2O-dominated atmosphere is more volatile-rich than Venus and Earth. Possible volatile-rich worlds include planets that have radii ∼0.2 R greater than expected for Earth composition (SI Appendix, Fig. S12) (71).

Fig. 6 enables the following testable predictions. Since atmospheres close to the star can only persist if the initial H2O inventory is high, N2/NH3 should be diluted to very low mixing ratio for such atmospheres. If a super-Earth–sized planet has an atmosphere, then planets at greater semimajor axis in the same system should also have an atmosphere. Starting out as a sub-Neptune is unfavorable for atmosphere persistence, so systems where the planets formed intrinsically rocky should have statistically more atmospheres. Multiplanet systems enable strong tests because uncertainty in time-integrated stellar flux cancels out.

Conclusions

A large fraction of rocky exoplanets on close-in orbits (closer to their star than the habitable zone) were born with thick (>10 kbar) H2-dominated (primary) atmospheres but have since lost their H2. In our model, these Teq > 400 K exoplanets almost never transition smoothly to worlds with high–molecular-weight atmospheres (Fig. 7). Instead, the high–molecular-weight species are usually carried away to space by the H wind. Volcanic outgassing is an alternative source for a high–molecular-weight atmosphere. Revival of a bare-rock planet by volcanic outgassing gets easier with time, because atmosphere loss slows down rapidly with time, but atmosphere supply by volcanism decays slowly. However, volcanic outgassing is also enfeebled by early loss of biocritical volatiles via the H wind. Overall, for a given initial dose of high–molecular-weight species, atmospheres are less likely on hot rocky exoplanets that were born with thick H2-dominated atmospheres. Many uncertainties remain, the most important of which is the initial planet volatile content. Within our model, for planets that orbit solar-mass stars, super-Earth atmospheres are possible at insolations much higher than for planet Mercury. For planets that orbit ∼0.3 M stars, secondary atmospheres at much higher insolation than planet Mercury in our solar system are unlikely unless the planet formed H2-poor, or includes a major (∼1 wt%) contribution of solids from beyond the water ice line (water world).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Graphical summary. The left column corresponds to atmosphere revival (gray lines in Fig. 6), and the right column corresponds to residual atmospheres (red lines in Fig. 6). For worlds in Teq > 400 K orbits that start as sub-Neptunes, formation of a high-μ atmosphere is unlikely, unless the planet starts with abundant high-μ volatiles.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File

Acknowledgments

We thank two reviewers for accurate and useful reviews. We thank B. Fegley Jr., L. Schaefer, L. Rogers, E. Ford, and J. Bean (discussions). This work was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Exoplanets Research Program Grant NNX16AB44G.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Data deposition: All of the code for this paper, together with instructions to reproduce each of the figures and supplementary figures, can be obtained via the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/t9h68.

This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2006177117/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

All of the code for this paper, together with instructions to reproduce each of the figures and supplementary figures, can be obtained via the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/t9h68 or by emailing the lead author.

References

  • 1.Atreya S., Pollack J., Matthews M., Eds., Origin & Evolution of Planetary and Satellite Atmospheres, (University of Arizona Press, 1989). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Marty B. et al., Origins of volatile elements (H, C, N, noble gases) on Earth and Mars in light of recent results from the ROSETTA cometary mission. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 441, 91–102 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fulton B. J., Petigura E. A., The California-Kepler survey. VII. Precise planet radii leveraging Gaia DR2 reveal the stellar mass dependence of the planet radius gap. Astron. J. 156, 264 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Van Eylen V. et al., An asteroseismic view of the radius valley: Stripped cores, not born rocky. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 4786–4795 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dauphas N., Morbidelli A., “Geochemical and planetary dynamical views on the origin of Earth’s atmosphere and oceans” in Treatise on Geochemistry, Holland H. D., Turekian K. K., Eds. (Elsevier, Oxford, ed. 2, 2014), pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bergin E. A., Blake G. A., Ciesla F., Hirschmann M. M., Li J., Tracing the ingredients for a habitable earth from interstellar space through planet formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 8965–8970 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Catling D. C., Kasting J. F., Atmospheric Evolution on Inhabited and Lifeless Worlds, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kempton E. M.-R. et al., A framework for prioritizing the TESS planetary candidates most amenable to atmospheric characterization. Proc. Astron. Soc. Pacific 130, 114401 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine , Exoplanet Science Strategy, (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zahnle K., Catling D., The cosmic shoreline: The evidence that escape determines which planets have atmospheres, and what this may mean for Proxima Centauri b. Astrophys. J. 843, 122 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Turekian K. K., Clark S. P., Inhomogeneous accumulation of the Earth from the primitive solar nebula. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 6, 346–348 (1969). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Urey H., The origin and development of the Earth and other terrestrial planets. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1, 209–277 (1951). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Slattery W. L., Decampli W. M., Cameron A. G. W., Protoplanetary core formation by rain-out of minerals. Moon Planets 23, 381–390 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sasaki S., “The primary solar-type atmosphere surrounding the accreting Earth: H2O-induced high surface temperature” in Origin of the Earth, Newsom H., Jones J. H., Eds. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990), pp. 195–209. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ozima M., Zahnle K., Mantle degassing and atmospheric evolution: Noble gas view. Geochem. J. 27, 185–200 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Elkins-Tanton L., Seager S., Ranges of atmospheric mass and composition of super-Earth exoplanets. Astrophys. J. 685, 1237–1246 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dorn C. et al., Outgassing on stagnant-lid super-earths. Astron. Astrophys. 614, A18 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dai F. et al., Homogeneous analysis of hot earths: Masses, sizes, and compositions. Astrophys. J. 883, 79 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Owen J. E., Wu Y., The evaporation valley in the Kepler planets. Astrophys. J. 847, 29 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Watson A. et al., The dynamics of a rapidly escaping atmosphere: Applications to the evolution of Earth and Venus. Icarus 48, 150–166 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kulikov Y. N. et al., A comparative study of the influence of the active young Sun on the early atmospheres of Earth, Venus, and Mars. Space Sci. Rev. 129, 207–243 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Johnstone C. et al., Upper atmospheres of terrestrial planets: Carbon dioxide cooling and the Earth’s thermospheric evolution. Astron. Astrophys. 617, A107 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kegerreis J. A., et al. , Atmospheric erosion by giant impacts onto terrestrial planets. arXiv:2002.02977 (7 February 2020).
  • 24.Vazan A. et al., Contribution of the core to the thermal evolution of sub-Neptunes. Astrophys. J. 869, 163 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Genda H., Abe Y., Enhanced atmospheric loss on protoplanets at the giant impact phase in the presence of oceans. Nature 433, 842–844 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Elkins-Tanton L., Linked magma ocean solidification and atmospheric growth for Earth and Mars. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 271, 181–191 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hunten D. M. et al., Mass fractionation in hydrodynamic escape. Icarus 69, 532–549 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu R. et al., Helium atmospheres on warm Neptune-and sub-Neptune-sized exoplanets and applications to GJ 436b. Astrophys. J. 807, 8 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hirschmann M. M. et al., Solubility of molecular hydrogen in silicate melts and consequences for volatile evolution of terrestrial planets. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 345, 38–48 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marcq E. et al., Thermal radiation of magma ocean planets using a 1‐D radiative‐convective model of H2O‐CO2 atmosphere. JGR-Planets 122, 1539–1553 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Solomatov V., “Magma oceans and primordial mantle differentiation” in Treatise on Geophysics, Schubert G., Ed. (Elsevier, Oxford, ed. 2, 2015), Vol. 9, pp. 81–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Caracas R. et al., Melt–crystal density crossover in a deep magma ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 516, 202–211 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Woitke P. et al., Equilibrium chemistry down to 100 K. Impact of silicates and phyllosilicates on the carbon to oxygen ratio. Astron. Astrophys. 614, A1 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kite E. S., Manga M., Gaidos E., Geodynamics and rate of volcanism on massive Earth-like planets. Astrophys. J. 700, 1732 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tian F., History of water loss and atmospheric O2 buildup on rocky exoplanets near M dwarfs. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 432, 126–132 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Elkins-Tanton L. T., Formation of early water oceans on rocky planets. Astrophys. Space Sci. 332, 359–364 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gonnermann H. M., Mukhopadhyay S., Preserving noble gases in a convecting mantle. Nature 459, 560–563 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Saji N. S. et al., Hadean geodynamics inferred from time-varying 142Nd/144Nd in the early Earth rock record. Geochem. Perspect. Lett. 7, 43–48 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kaula W. M., Constraints on Venus evolution from radiogenic argon. Icarus 139, 32–39 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rogers L., Most 1.6 Earth-radius planets are not rocky. Astrophys. J. 801, 41 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gupta A., Schlichting H. E., Sculpting the valley in the radius distribution of small exoplanets as a by-product of planet formation: The core-powered mass-loss mechanism. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 487, 24–33 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lammer H. et al., Coronal mass ejection (CME) activity of low mass M stars as an important factor for the habitability of terrestrial exoplanets. II. CME-induced ion pick up of Earth-like exoplanets in close-in habitable zones. Astrobiology 7, 185–207 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Murray-Clay R. et al., Atmospheric escape from hot Jupiters. Astrophys. J. 693, 23–42 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tian F., Thermal escape from super Earth atmospheres in the habitable zones of M stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 703, 905–909 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tian F. et al., Thermal escape of carbon from the early Martian atmosphere. Geophys.Res. Lett. 36, L02205 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tucker J. M., Mukhopadhyay S., Gonnerman H. M., Reconstructing mantle carbon and noble gas contents from degassed mid-ocean ridge basalts. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 496, 108–119 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sleep N., Zahnle K., Carbon dioxide cycling and implications for climate on ancient Earth. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 106, 1373–1399 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Loyd R. O. P. et al., Current population statistics do not favor photoevaporation over core-powered mass loss as the dominant cause of the exoplanet radius gap. Astrophys. J. 890, 23 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jackson A. P., Davis T. A., Wheatley P. J., The coronal X-ray–age relation and its implications for the evaporation of exoplanets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 422, 2024–2043 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Guinan E. F. et al., Living with a red dwarf: Rotation and X-ray and ultraviolet properties of the halo population Kapteyn’s star. Astrophys. J. 821, 81 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Koll D. B. et al., Identifying candidate atmospheres on Rocky M Dwarf planets via eclipse photometry. Astrophys. J. 886, 140 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tu L. et al., The extreme ultraviolet and X-ray Sun in time: High-energy evolutionary tracks of a solar-like star. Astron. Astrophys. 577, L3 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zahnle K. et al., Strange messenger: A new history of hydrogen on Earth, as told by Xenon. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 244, 56–85 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bourrier V. et al., Hubble PanCET: An extended upper atmosphere of neutral hydrogen around the warm Neptune GJ 3470b. Astron. Astrophys. 620, A147 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ardila D., et al. , The star-planet activity research cubeSat (SPARCS). https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/smallsat/2018/all2018/439/. Accessed 3 April 2020.
  • 56.Linsky J., Host Stars and Their Effects on Exoplanet Atmospheres, (Springer, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dong C. et al., Atmospheric escape from the TRAPPIST-1 planets and implications for habitability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 260–265 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Egan H., Jarvinen R., Ma Y., Brain D., Planetary magnetic field control of ion escape from weakly magnetized planets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 488, 2108–2220 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Papale P., Modeling of the solubility of a one-component H2O or CO2 fluid in silicate liquids. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 126, 237–251 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fegley B. et al., Volatile element chemistry during accretion of the Earth, geochemistry. Chem. Erde 80, 125594 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Guillot B., Sator N., Carbon dioxide in silicate melts: A molecular dynamics simulation study. GCA 75, 1829–1857 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Stevenson D. J., Styles of mantle convection and their influence on planetary evolution. C. R. Geosci. 335, 99–111 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Unterborn C. T., Johnson J. A., Panero W. R., Thorium abundances in solar twins and analogs: Implications for the habitability of extrasolar planetary systems. Astrophys. J. 806, 139 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Byrne P. K., A comparison of inner solar system volcanism. Nat. Astron. 4, 321–327 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Médard E., Grove T., Early hydrous melting and degassing of the Martian interior JGR-Planets. 111, E11003 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Demory B.-O., Gillon M., Madhusudhan N., Queloz D., Variability in the super-Earth 55 Cnc e. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 2018–2027 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kreidberg L. et al., Absence of a thick atmosphere on the terrestrial exoplanet LHS 3844b. Nature 573, 87–90 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tian F., Ida S., Water contents of Earth-mass planets around M dwarfs. Nat. Geosci. 8, 177–180 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bitsch B., Raymond S. N., Izidoro A., Rocky super-Earths or waterworlds: The interplay of planet migration, pebble accretion, and disc evolution. Astron. Astrophys. 624, A109 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Raymond S. N., Boulet T., Izidoro A., Esteves L., Bitsch B., Migration-driven diversity of super-Earth compositions. MNRAS Letters 479, L81–L85 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Turbet M. et al., Revised mass-radius relationships for water-rich terrestrial planets more irradiated than the runaway greenhouse limit. Astron. Astrophys. 638, A41 (2020). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File

Data Availability Statement

All of the code for this paper, together with instructions to reproduce each of the figures and supplementary figures, can be obtained via the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/t9h68 or by emailing the lead author.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES