Skip to main content
Journal of Family & Community Medicine logoLink to Journal of Family & Community Medicine
. 2020 Jun 3;27(2):109–113. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_293_19

Cherry angioma: A case–control study

Ramah I Nazer 1, Rahaf H Bashihab 2, Wedad H Al-Madani 3, Aamir A Omair 4, Mohammed I AlJasser 1,2,4,5,
PMCID: PMC7415270  PMID: 32831556

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Cherry angiomas (CAs) are very common asymptomatic vascular skin lesions. There are only a few studies on CAs in the literature and those assessing risk factors of CAs are scarce. The aim of our study was to determine risk factors for the development of CAs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A case–control study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients underwent a full-body examination for CAs. Demographics and other data including medical history and medications were extracted from electronic medical records.

RESULTS:

A total of three hundred patients were enrolled: one hundred cases with at least five CAs and two hundred controls without CAs. Bivariate analysis identified benign prostatic hyperplasia (odds ratio [OR]: = 2.591), malignancy (OR = 2.567), tamsulosin (OR = 3.171), and clopidogrel (OR = 0.321) as statistically significant associations. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, only tamsulosin (OR = 3.475, P = 0.009) and clopidogrel (OR = 0.281, P = 0.028) were found to be independent risk factors for CAs. Malignancies tended to be more associated with CAs, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION:

Tamsulosin is a possible risk factor for the development of CAs. Clopidogrel seems to have a protective role preventing the development of CAs.

Keywords: Campbell de Morgan spots, cherry angioma, cherry hemangioma, senile hemangioma

Introduction

Cherry angiomas (CAs) or “Campbell de Morgan spots” are one of the most common benign cutaneous vascular lesions. They present as asymptomatic, small, bright-red papules usually on the trunk and extremities of older individuals.[1] The frequency of CAs increases with age, but have no reported clinical consequences.[2] The incidence of CAs was 49.5% in males, who seem to be more commonly affected than females.[3] The treatment of CAs is cosmetic because they are benign and asymptomatic.[1]

The pathogenesis of CAs is not entirely known. Reduced expression of miR-424 in CAs was found to be associated with abnormal angiogenesis through MEK1 or cyclin E1.[4] Human herpesvirus 8 has a possible role in eruptive CAs.[5] Some somatic genetic mutations have been identified in CAs.[6]

Risk factors associated with the development of multiple CAs could include age, chronic immunosuppression, chronic graft-versus-host disease, and malignancy.[7,8] Some studies suggest an association between CAs and the exposure to certain chemicals and drugs such as cyclosporine,[9] sulfur mustard,[10] nitrogen mustard,[11] and bromides.[12]

Studies on risk factors associated with CAs are few and limited mainly to case reports and uncontrolled studies. Controlled studies, which explored a limited number of variables, are surprisingly very few for this common condition. This study was done to explore risk factors associated with the occurrence of CAs.

Materials and Methods

This was a case–control study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, one of the largest tertiary care centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center and informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

Cases were defined as patients with five or more CAs. Controls were age- and gender-matched patients who did not have any CAs. Only Saudi patients aged ≥18 years and admitted to the hospital were included in the study. Patients who refused a full body examination, or had received previous treatment for CAs, or had 1–4 CAs were excluded from the study.

The target case-to-control ratio was 1:2. The sample size was estimated as hundred cases and two hundred controls using OpenEpi sample size calculator. The calculation was based on an estimated 30%–40% exposure to the risk factor in the control group, to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 2.0 or more at the 95% confidence level and power of 80%. A nonprobability consecutive sampling was used to select the cases, while the selection of controls was based on matching for age and gender.

Full-body skin examination was performed on all patients. Variables consisted of demographics, Fitzpatrick skin phototype, and region of residence. Furthermore, the duration of CA, body site, and diameter were documented. Data regarding family history, medical conditions, malignancies, and environmental triggers were collected. Details of current medications were gathered from the electronic medical record.

Statistical analysis was done using Statistical package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages and were compared using the Chi-square test. Numerical variables were reported as means with standard deviation and were compared by Student's t-test. Skewed numerical data were presented as median and inter-quartile range. Step-wise multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine any associated risk factors, if any, for the development of CAs. Variables entered in the model were those with P < 0.2 between cases and controls in the bivariate analysis. The results of regression analysis were presented as OR with 95% confidence interval. For all the statistical tests, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of hundred cases and two hundred controls were enrolled in the study. The most common site of CAs was the trunk (mainly the chest) followed by the proximal extremities, head and neck, distal extremities, hands, and feet [Figure 1]. Similarly, the trunk had the highest number and CAs with the largest diameter [Table 1].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Distribution of cherry angiomas based on the body site (n= 100)

Table 1.

Characteristics of cherry angiomas based on body site (n=100)

Body site
Number of lesions Mean±SD Smallestdiameter (mm) Mean±SD Largestdiameter (mm) Mean±SD
Head and neck 1.86 (1.21) 0.6 (0.3) 1.8 (1.1)
Chest and axillae 3.61 (2.67) 0.7 (0.5) 1.9 (1.3)
Abdomen 3 (2.0) 1 (0.3) 2.3 (2.1)
Back 3.73 (2.87) 0.74 (0.56) 1.9 (1.3)
Arms 3 (2.0) 0.6 (0.3) 1.3 (0.8)
Forearms 2 (1.0) 0.8 (0.6) 1.5 (0.8)
Hands 1 (0) 0.9 (0.7) 0.9 (0.7)
Thighs and buttocks 2.29 (1.29) 0.7 (0.3) 2 (1.0)
Legs 2 (1.0) 0.7 (0.4) 1 (0.5)
Feet* 2 (0) 1 (0) 1 (0)

*Only one patient had cherry angioma on the foot. SD=Standard deviation

Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 2. No statistically significant difference was found between cases and controls with regard to age and gender. Similarly, no difference was found in body mass index, region of residence, job, and history of smoking. A family history of CA was positive in 12% of cases. The median duration of CAs was 6 years (interquartile range 3–20).

Table 2.

Bivariate analysis of patient characteristics

Characteristic Control (n=200)
Cases (n=100)
P-Value
n Mean±SD n Mean±SD
Age (years) 200 54.0±19.0 100 57.0±19.0 0.155
BMI 200 28.89±8.98 100 28.26±8.10 0.540
Characteristics Cases (n=100)N (%) Controls (n=200)N (%) P -Value
Gender
 Male 100 (50.0) 51 (51.0) 0.870
 Female 100 (50.0) 49 (49.0)
Region of residence
 Central 158 (79.0) 82 (82.0) 0.949
 North 12 (6.0) 6 (6.0)
 South 8 (4.0) 4 (4.0)
 East 12 (6.0) 4 (4.0)
 West 10 (5.0) 4 (4.0)
Job
 Physician 0 (0) 1 (1.0) 0.330
 Teacher 4 (2.0) 5 (5.0)
 Military 20 (10.0) 7 (7.0)
 Homemaker 88 (44.0) 43 (43.0)
 Retired 58 (29.0) 35 (35.0)
 Governmental 4 (2.0) 3 (3.0)
 Student 9 (4.5) 3 (3.0)
 None 5 (2.5) 1 (1.0)
 Other 12 (6.0) 2 (2.0)
Smoker
 No 176 (88.0) 92 (92.0) 0.290
 Yes 24 (12.0) 8 (8.0)
Family history* - 12 (12.0)
Duration of cherry angiomas in years*, median (IQR) - 6 (3-20)

*Cases only. BMI=Body mass index, SD=Standard deviation, IQR=Interquartile range

Bivariate analysis identified benign prostatic hyperplasia (OR = 2.591), malignancy (OR = 2.567), tamsulosin (OR = 3.171), and clopidogrel (OR = 0.321) as statistically significant associations [Table 3]. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, only tamsulosin and clopidogrel were found to be independent risk factors for CAs [Table 4]. Patients on tamsulosin were more likely to have CAs (OR = 3.475, P = 0.009), while those on clopidogrel seem to be less likely to have CAs (OR = 0.281, P = 0.028). Malignancy tended to have more association with CAs, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.07).

Table 3.

Bivariate analysis: Factors associated with cherry angioma

Controls (n=200)N (%) Cases (n=100)N (%) Crude OR P -Value aOR P -Value 95% CI for aOR
Diabetes 86 (43.0) 47 (47.0) 1.176 0.511 0.925 0.806 0.496-1.726
Hypertension 94 (47) 55 (55.0) 1.378 0.192 1.388 0.312 0.734-2.625
Dyslipidemia 36 (18.0) 18 (18.0) 1.000 1.0 0.980 0.956 0.476-2.018
Coronary artery disease 16 (8.0) 8 (8.0) 1.000 1.0 0.793 0.674 0.270-2.332
Stroke 13 (6.5) 8 (8.0) 1.251 0.632 1.544 0.413 0.546-4.367
Rheumatoid arthritis 3 (1.5) 4 (4.0) 2.736 0.193 4.802 0.133 0.620-37.192
Asthma 13 (6.5) 5 (5.0) 0.757 0.607 0.572 0.382 0.163-2.002
Hypothyroidism 12 (6.0) 7 (7.0) 1.179 0.737 1.020 0.970 0.362-2.878
Hyperthyroidism 1 (0.5) 2 (2.0) 4.061 0.255 3.791 0.349 0.233-61.716
Chronic kidney disease 14 (7.0) 8 (8.0) 1.155 0.754 0.929 0.890 0.328-2.635
Cirrhosis 2 (1.0) 2 (2.0) 2.020 0.485 1.174 0.896 0.107-12.916
Benign prostatic hyperplasia 10 (5.0) 12 (12.0) 2.591 0.033 0.333 0.402 0.025-4.363
Previous or current malignancies 11 (5.5) 13 (13.0) 2.567 0.028 3.419 0.019 1.219-9.590
Previous chemotherapy 4 (2.0) 1 (1.0) 0.495 0.632 0.192 0.234 0.013-2.905
Previous immunosuppression 16 (8.0) 10 (10.0) 1.278 0.562 0.509 0.385 0.111-2.338
Previous organ transplant 4 (2.0) 5 (5.0) 2.579 0.165 5.357 0.110 0.684-41.939
Tamsulosin 9 (4.5) 13 (13.0) 3.171 0.011 9.613 0.086 0.729-126.809
Clopidogrel 23 (11.5) 4 (4.0) 0.321 0.041 0.244 0.021 0.074-0.812
Fitzpatrick skin type
 II and III 78 (39.0) 36 (36.0) 1.038 0.848 0.975 0.907 0.640-1.487
 IV 111 (55.5) 60 (60.0)
 V and VI 11 (5.5) 4 (4.0)
Pregnancy 14 (7.0) 3 (3.0) 0.411 0.170 0.442 0.240 0.114-1.723

CI=Confidence interval, OR=Odds ratio, aOR=Adjusted OR

Table 4.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis: Factors associated with cherry angioma

SE
OR
95% CI
P -Value
Lower Upper
Previous or current malignancies 0.443 2.232 0.936 5.323 0.07
Tamsulosin 0.480 3.475 1.357 8.899 0.009
Clopidogrel 0.576 0.281 0.091 0.870 0.028
Constant 0.139 0.462 0.000

CI=Confidence interval, OR=Odds ratio, SE=Standard error

Discussion

Studies on CAs are generally limited. Trunk was the most common site affected with CAs in our cases, which is in agreement with the literature and clinical observation.[1] The pathogenesis of CAs is still poorly understood. Genetic factors could play a role in the development of CAs. Family history of CAs was found in 12% of our cases. Somatic mutations in GNAQ and GNA11 genes were recently identified in CAs.[6] These genes are also known to be involved in the pathogenesis of other cutaneous vascular conditions such as capillary malformations.

Controlled studies on the risk factors of CAs are scarce. Borghi et al. assessed the risk factors of eruptive CAs in a total of 1032 patients.[13] Those with eruptive CAs had ≥30 CAs. The comparative group had either no or <30 CAs. Age, immunosuppressive therapy, and malignancy were identified as independent risk factors for eruptive CAs. Malignancy in our study had a tendency of having statistically significant association with CAs., The number of CAs was significantly more on the skin of the affected breast in patients with unilateral breast cancer.[14] Serum lipids were shown to be more elevated in patients with CAs in a case–control study.[15] The lipid profile was not assessed in our study.

Tamsulosin and clopidogrel were identified in our study as independently significant associations with CAs. To the best of our knowledge, this association has not been previously reported. We found that patients on tamsulosin were more likely to have CAs. Tamsulosin is a selective alpha1A and alpha1D-adrenergic receptor blocker that is used in the treatment of BPH.[16] Alpha-1 adrenergic receptors are mainly found in the prostate and bladder. Tamsulosin works by relaxing smooth muscles in the prostate and bladder and therefore, improves urinary symptoms in patients with BPH. Although tamsulosin primarily works on the lower urinary tract, it has been shown to have some effect on the blood vessels, leading to vasodilation.[17] This might explain the association between tamsulosin and CAs found in our study.

Our findings indicate that clopidogrel seems to have a protective role against CA formation. Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet that prevents platelet aggregation through the inhibition of adenosine diphosphate.[18] It is used for the prevention of coronary artery disease and stroke. Clopidogrel has been recently shown to have an anti-angiogenic effect.[19] Both the number of microvessels and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor were significantly reduced by clopidogrel.

Our study has some limitations. Post hoc analysis showed the power of study as 60.45%, which could be due to the small sample size. The study was done at one center and therefore, its findings cannot be generalized. Another limitation is that our study design depended to some extent on patient recall of information. A better design would have been a prospective cohort but that would have been time-consuming and expensive.

Conclusion

We identified tamsulosin as a possible risk factor for the development of CAs. However, clopidogrel seems to have a protective role, possibly preventing the development of CAs. Future well-designed studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Higgins JC, Maher MH, Douglas MS. Diagnosing common benign skin tumors. Am Fam Physician. 2015;92:601–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Luba MC, Bangs SA, Mohler AM, Stulberg DL. Common benign skin tumors. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67:729–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Patange VS, Fernandez RJ. A study of geriatric dermatoses. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1995;61:206–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nakashima T, Jinnin M, Etoh T, Fukushima S, Masuguchi S, Maruo K, et al. Down-regulation of mir-424 contributes to the abnormal angiogenesis via MEK1 and cyclin E1 in senile hemangioma: Its implications to therapy. PLoS One. 2010;5:e14334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Borghi A, Benedetti S, Corazza M, Gentili V, Ruina G, Di Luca D, et al. Detection of human herpesvirus 8 sequences in cutaneous cherry angiomas. Arch Dermatol Res. 2013;305:659–64. doi: 10.1007/s00403-013-1346-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Klebanov N, Lin WM, Artomov M, Shaughnessy M, Njauw CN, Bloom R, et al. Use of targeted next-generation sequencing to identify activating hot spot mutations in cherry angiomas. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:211–5. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garnis S, Billick RC, Srolovitz H. Eruptive vascular tumors associated with chronic graft-versus-host disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;10:918–21. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(84)80447-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Borghi A, Minghetti S, Battaglia Y, Corazza M. Predisposing factors for eruptive cherry angiomas: New insights from an observational study. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55:e598–600. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Felipe I, Redondo P. Eruptive angiomas after treatment with cyclosporine in a patient with psoriasis. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:1487–8. doi: 10.1001/archderm.134.11.1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Firooz A, Komeili A, Dowlati Y. Eruptive melanocytic nevi and cherry angiomas secondary to exposure to sulfur mustard gas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40:646–7. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70460-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ma HJ, Zhao G, Shi F, Wang YX. Eruptive cherry angiomas associated with vitiligo: Provoked by topical nitrogen mustard? J Dermatol. 2006;33:877–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2006.00200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cohen AD, Cagnano E, Vardy DA. Cherry angiomas associated with exposure to bromides. Dermatology. 2001;202:52–3. doi: 10.1159/000051587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Borghi A, Minghetti S, Battaglia Y, Corazza M. Predisposing factors for eruptive cherry angiomas: New insights from an observational study. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55:e598–600. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guastafierro A, Verdura V, Di Pace B, Faenza M, Rubino C. The influence of breast cancer on the distribution of cherry angiomas on the anterior thoracic wall: A case series study. Dermatology. 2019;235:65–70. doi: 10.1159/000493974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Darjani A, Rafiei R, Shafaei S, Rafiei E, Eftekhari H, Alizade N, et al. Evaluation of lipid profile in patients with cherry angioma: A case-control study in Guilan, Iran. Dermatol Res Pract. 2018;2018:4639248. doi: 10.1155/2018/4639248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dunn CJ, Matheson A, Faulds DM. Tamsulosin: A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms. Drugs Aging. 2002;19:135–61. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200219020-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harada K, Kawaguchi A, Ohmori M, Fujimura A. Antagonistic activity of tamsulosin against human vascular alpha1-adrenergic receptors. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;67:405–12. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2000.105354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Clopidogrel. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed) Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Luo JC, Peng YL, Chen TS, Huo TI, Hou MC, Huang HC, et al. Clopidogrel inhibits angiogenesis of gastric ulcer healing via downregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. J Formos Med Assoc. 2016;115:764–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Family & Community Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES