Skip to main content
Thieme - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Thieme - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 May 12;37(10):1070–1073. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712181

Laboratory Abnormalities in Pregnant Women with Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019

Li Shi 1, Ying Wang 1, Haiyan Yang 1,, Guangcai Duan 1, Yadong Wang 2
PMCID: PMC7416199  PMID: 32396949

Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), sustained by the causative agent called severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is highly contagious. 1 2 At present, above 2 million confirmed cases and over 170,000 deaths of COVID-19 have occurred in the world according to the World Health Organization. 3 Pregnant women, because of their special physiological conditions, are susceptible to the virus and put themselves at greater risk. 4 Timely control and treatment of pregnant women with COVID-19 infection are a major concern. 5 Moreover, laboratory medicine plays a vital role in this process. 6 Therefore, the purpose of this article is to identify the most common laboratory abnormalities in pregnant women with COVID-19.

PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases were reviewed by two independent authors, using the keywords “coronavirus” OR “Wuhan coronavirus” OR “SARS-CoV-2” OR “2019 novel coronavirus” OR “2019-nCoV” OR “COVID-19” AND “pregnancy” OR “pregnant woman” OR “pregnant women” OR “vertical transmission” (up to April 20, 2020). There were no country, race, or language restrictions. We included articles reporting laboratory data in pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19 by reading titles, abstracts, and full texts. Besides, the lists of references for all articles were also screened to identify potentially additional articles. A descriptive statistical analysis was applied to summarize their findings. A random-effects model meta-analysis was then carried out to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95%confidence interval (95% CI) to assess the prevalence of laboratory abnormalities in pregnant women with COVID-19. Double arcsine method was implemented to make original data conform to normal distribution, and then we analyzed them in software Stata version 11.2 to obtain initial results. Final results were restored by the formula (P = [sin(tp/2)] 2 ). 7 Begg's test and Egger's test were utilized to evaluate publication bias.

A total of 244 articles were reviewed, among which 223 were removed due to a lack of laboratory data about pregnant women. Although eight articles reported laboratory data in pregnant women with COVID-19, they were eliminated because of duplicated data. In addition, two articles that did not clearly report laboratory abnormalities were also excluded. Overall, a total of 11 articles with 173 pregnant patients were included, 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 among which 11 women had severe disease, and 2 women had critical disease. Most of the patients came from China, and one each came from Korea, the United States, Sweden, Iran, Peru, and Canada. The stages of pregnancy ranged from the first trimester to the third trimester. The characteristics of these patients are indicated in Table 1 .

Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.

Characteristics Wang et al 17 Li et al 14 Lee et al 13 Iqbal et al 12 Gidlöf et al 11 Zamaniyan et al 18 Alzamora et al 8 Vlachodimitropoulou Koumoutsea et al 16 Chen et al 10 Liu et al 15 Chen et al 9
Location China China Korea USA Sweden Iran Peru Canada China China China
Number of cases 1 (severe) 1 1 1 1 1 (critical) 1 (severe) 2 5 41 118 (9 severe and 1 critical)
Age (y) 28 30 28 34 34 22 41 40/23 29 (median) 30 (median) 31 (median)
Gestational age (wk) 30 35 37 39 36 32 33 35/35 38–41 22–40 N/R
Laboratory data
Leukocytes ↑100% N/R N/R ↓100% N/R ↑60% ↑41% ↑15% a ↓5% a
Neutrophils ↑100% ↑100% N/R N/R ↑100% N/R N/R ↑80% ↑83% N/R
Lymphocytes ↓100% N/R ↓100% N/R ↓100% ↓100% ↓100% ↓80% ↓61% ↓44% a
CRP ↑100% N/R N/R N/R ↑100% ↑100% N/R ↑100% a ↑66% ↑67% a
Platelets N/R ↓100% N/R N/R N/R ↓100% ↓100% N/R ↓3% a
Hemoglobin N/R ↓100% ↓100% N/R N/R ↓100% N/R ↓40% N/R N/R
Procalcitonin N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R ↑26% a
ESR N/R N/R ↑100% N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R
Albumin ↓100% N/R N/R ↓100% N/R N/R N/R N/R ↓100% N/R N/R
ALT N/R N/R N/R N/R ↑100% N/R ↑23% a
AST N/R N/R N/R N/R ↑100% N/R ↑21% a
ALP N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R ↑80% N/R N/R
Bilirubin N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R
Creatinine N/R N/R ↓100% N/R ↓100% N/R ↓20% N/R N/R
Creatine kinase N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R ↓100% N/R ↑20% ↓20% N/R N/R
LDH ↑100% N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R ↑20% N/R ↑29% a
D-dimer ↑100% ↑100% N/R N/R N/R N/R ↑100% ↑100% ↑100% a N/R ↑82% a
PT N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R

Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; ; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; N/R, not (clearly) reported; PT, prothrombin time.

a

Data missing for patients; ↔Data within the normal reference range.

Note: laboratory data are presented as percent of patients with abnormalities defined by local reference ranges.

Four articles were included in the meta-analysis. 9 10 15 16 Our results indicated that among all laboratory parameters of pregnant women with COVID-19, the incidence of elevated D-dimer was 82% (95% CI: 75–89%), elevated neutrophil count was 81% (95% CI: 69–91%), elevated C-reactive protein was 69% (95% CI: 58–79%), and decreased lymphocyte count was 59% (95% CI: 41–75%). Begg's test and Egger's test showed that no publication bias existed ( Table 2 ). No other laboratory parameters showed apparently consistent changes due to the limitation of available data.

Table 2. Meta-analysis results for assessing the prevalence of laboratory abnormalities in pregnant women with COVID-19 (random-effects model).

Laboratory data Studies Case number Initial results a Final results b Heterogeneity Begg's test ( p -Value) Egger's test ( p -Value)
I 2 (%) p -Value
Elevated D-dimer 3 109 2.27 (2.09, 2.46) 0.82 (0.75, 0.89) 0.0 0.697 1 0.148
Elevated neutrophil count 2 46 2.25 (1.97, 2.53) 0.81 (0.69, 0.91) 0.0 0.707 1
Elevated CRP 3 151 1.95 (1.73, 2.18) 0.69 (0.58, 0.79) 31.2 0.234 1 0.317
Decreased lymphocyte count 4 164 1.75 (1.39, 2.10) 0.59 (0.41, 0.75) 62.9 0.044 0.308 0.082
Elevated leukocyte count 3 162 1.23 (0.69, 1.78) 0.33 (0.11, 0.60) 86.7 0.001 1 0.392
Elevated LDH 2 84 1.14 (0.93, 1.35) 0.29 (0.20, 0.39) 0.0 0.796 1

Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CRP, C-reactive protein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

a

The pooled prevalence and 95%confidence interval obtained by meta-analysis after adjusting the original data with the double arcsine method.

b

The pooled prevalence and 95%confidence interval obtained after restoring the initial results with the formula (P = [sin(tp/2)] 2 ).

Considering the relatively high-sequence identity of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV and the effects of SARS-CoV on pregnant women, we must pay great attention to the group of pregnant women infected with COVID-19. 19 20 Our review suggests that the most frequent abnormalities are elevated D-dimer (82%), elevated neutrophil count (81%), elevated C-reactive protein (69%), and decreased lymphocyte count (59%). However, a meta-analysis of adult COVID-19 infection reported that decreased albumin (75.8%), high C-reactive protein (58.3%), high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; 57.0%), lymphopenia (43.1%), and high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; 41.8%) were the most prevalent laboratory abnormalities. 21 Our study found that the incidence of increased LDH in pregnant women with COVID-19 was only 29%. A total of seven cases reported by Wang et al, 17 Iqbal et al, 12 and Chen et al 10 showed decreased albumin levels. Similarly, only Lee et al 13 described that ESR increased in the pregnant woman with COVID-19. Due to the limitation of the data, we did not further conduct a meta-analysis on these laboratory parameters. Thus, more studies with large sample size are needed to discuss this in the future. In addition, Zhang et al 22 reported that among five pregnant women with SARS-CoV infection, two cases had decreased lymphocytes. Recent studies also reported elevated D-dimer levels, elevated neutrophil count, elevated C-reactive protein levels, and decreased lymphocyte count as indicators of poor outcomes in nonpregnant individuals with COVID-19. 23 We should pay careful attention to these laboratory indicators of pregnant women with COVID-19. However, D-dimer was typically elevated during pregnancy, 24 and a comparative cross-sectional study revealed that pregnant women had significantly higher white blood cell count, neutrophil count, and lymphocyte count compared with nonpregnant women. 25 Therefore, pregnancy factors should also be considered when dynamically monitoring changes of laboratory indicators in pregnant women with COVID-19.

Of course, our review has some limitations. We included only 11 articles, including case reports and case series, and most of them were from China. Again, reference ranges for laboratory values differed between reports and several data elements were not clearly reported. In addition, most of the pregnant women with COVID-19 included in our review were mild and moderate, with only 11 cases being severe and 2 cases being critical. We were unable to compare laboratory abnormalities between pregnant women with mild and severe. So, more data from other regions are needed to better define laboratory abnormalities in pregnant women with COVID-19 infection. In our meta-analysis, elevated D-dimer levels, elevated neutrophil count, elevated C-reactive protein levels, and decreased lymphocyte count are the most prevalent laboratory abnormalities in pregnant women with COVID-19, which is slightly different from the characteristics in nonpregnant patients. We should consider pregnancy factors when monitoring changes in pregnant women.

Funding Statement

Funding This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no.: 81973105).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest None declared.

References

  • 1.Lake M A. What we know so far: COVID-19 current clinical knowledge and research. Clin Med (Lond) 2020;20(02):124–127. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-coron. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chan J F, Yuan S, Kok K Het al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster Lancet 2020395(10223):514–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization.Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports-94Available at:https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200423-sitrep-94-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=b8304bf0_4. Accessed 23 April, 2020
  • 4.Chen H, Guo J, Wang Cet al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records Lancet 2020395(10226):809–815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Qiao J.What are the risks of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women? Lancet 2020395(10226):760–762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lippi G, Plebani M.A modern and pragmatic definition of Laboratory MedicineClin Chem Lab Med2020(e-pub ahead of print) Doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0114 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Sun P, Qie S, Liu Z, Ren J, Li K, Xi J.Clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A single arm meta-analysisJ Med Virol2020(e-pub ahead of print) Doi: 10.1002/jmv.25735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Alzamora M C, Paredes T, Caceres D, Webb C M, Valdez L M, La Rosa M.Severe COVID-19 during pregnancy and possible vertical transmissionAm J Perinatol2020(e-pub ahead of print) Doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Chen L, Li Q, Zheng Det al. Clinical characteristics of pregnant women with COVID-19 in Wuhan, ChinaN Engl J Med2020(e-pub ahead of print) Doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2009226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Chen S, Liao E, Cao D, Gao Y, Sun G, Shao Y.Clinical analysis of pregnant women with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumoniaJ Med Virol2020(e-pub ahead of print) Doi: 10.1002/jmv.25789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Gidlöf S, Savchenko J, Brune T, Josefsson H.COVID-19 in pregnancy with comorbidities: More liberal testing strategy is neededActa Obstet Gynecol Scand2020(e-pub ahead of print) Doi: 10.1111/aogs.13862 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Iqbal S N, Overcash R, Mokhtari N et al. An uncomplicated delivery in a patient with COVID-19 in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):e34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2007605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lee D H, Lee J, Kim E, Woo K, Park H Y, An J.Emergency cesarean section on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) confirmed patientKorean J Anesthesiol2020(e-pub ahead of print) Doi: 10.4097/kja.20116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Li Y, Zhao R, Zheng Set al. Lack of vertical transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, ChinaEmerg Infect Dis202026(06). Doi: 10.3201/eid2606.200287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Liu H, Liu F, Li J, Zhang T, Wang D, Lan W. Clinical and CT imaging features of the COVID-19 pneumonia: Focus on pregnant women and children. J Infect. 2020;80(05):e7–e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vlachodimitropoulou Koumoutsea E, Vivanti A J, Shehata Net al. COVID19 and acute coagulopathy in pregnancyJ Thromb Haemost2020(e-pub ahead of print) Doi: 10.1111/jth.14856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Wang X, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Zhu F, Tang Y, Shen X.A case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in a pregnant woman with preterm delivery Clin Infect Dis 2020ciaa200(e-pub ahead of print). Doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zamaniyan M, Ebadi A, Aghajanpoor Mir S, Rahmani Z, Haghshenas M, Azizi S.Preterm delivery in pregnant woman with critical COVID-19 pneumonia and vertical transmissionPrenat Diagn2020(e-pub ahead of print) Doi: 10.1002/pd.5713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.Schwartz D A, Graham A L.Potential maternal and infant outcomes from (Wuhan) coronavirus 2019-nCoV infecting pregnant women: lessons from SARS, MERS, and other human coronavirus infections Viruses 20201202E194. Doi: 10.3390/v12020194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tian X, Li C, Huang A et al. Potent binding of 2019 novel coronavirus spike protein by a SARS coronavirus-specific human monoclonal antibody. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(01):382–385. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rodriguez-Morales A J, Cardona-Ospina J A, Gutiérrez-Ocampo Eet al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis Travel Med Infect Dis 2020101623(e-pub ahead of print). Doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang J P, Wang Y H, Chen L N, Zhang R, Xie Y F. [Clinical analysis of pregnancy in second and third trimesters complicated severe acute respiratory syndrome] Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2003;38(08):516–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Henry B M, de Oliveira M HS, Benoit S, Plebani M, Lippi G.Hematologic, biochemical and immune biomarker abnormalities associated with severe illness and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysisClin Chem Lab Med2020(e-pub ahead of print) Doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0369 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 24.Abbassi-Ghanavati M, Greer L G, Cunningham F G. Pregnancy and laboratory studies: a reference table for clinicians. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(06):1326–1331. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2bde8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alemu A, Abebe M, Terefe Bet al. Hematological indices of pregnant women at the university of gondar referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional studyClin Lab201965(08) [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from American Journal of Perinatology are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES