Skip to main content
The Oncologist logoLink to The Oncologist
letter
. 2020 May 27;25(8):e1251. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0285

How to Manage Febrile Neutropenia During the COVID Pandemic?

Saber Boutayeb 1,, Ibrahim El Ghissassi 1, Hind Mrabti 1, Hassan Errihani 1
PMCID: PMC7418344  PMID: 32399999

Short abstract

This letter to the editor reflects on the recently published article about management of cancer patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic by Al‐Shamsi et al., specifically as regards the management of febrile neutropenia in the context of the pandemic.


We have read with great interest the article entitled “A Practical Approach to the Management of Cancer Patients during the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) Pandemic: An International Collaborative Group” by Al Shamsi et al. [1]. We totally agree with the recommendations made by the authors in order to prevent infections, such as wide use of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor and dose adaptations. But even if these approaches will lower the rate of febrile neutropenia induced by cancer treatments, we should anticipate life‐threatening situations. The common practice is to identify patients with neutropenia who are at high risk of complications, to admit them in the hospital, and to treat them empirically with intravenous antibiotics [2, 3, 4]. But, in this context of the pandemic, all patients with febrile neutropenia will be at risk and potentially already COVID‐19 positive. We think that despite the absence of a high level of evidence, in cases of febrile neutropenia, a chest computed tomography (CT) scan should be systematically performed even in the absence of a cough. This practice would be justified by the data published by Liang et al. showing that the CT lesions of COVID were more frequent in patients with cancer (94.4% vs. 70.8%, p = .033) [5]. Polymerase chain reaction–based biological tests could be done depending on availability and the results of the CT scan. This systematic screening of COVID‐19 among febrile neutropenia can reduce intrahospital contagion and allow early treatment.

Disclosures

Hassan Errihani: Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck (C/A). The other authors indicated no financial relationships.

(C/A) Consulting/advisory relationship; (RF) Research funding; (E) Employment; (ET) Expert testimony; (H) Honoraria received; (OI) Ownership interests; (IP) Intellectual property rights/inventor/patent holder; (SAB) Scientific advisory board

Editor's Note: See the related article, “In Reply” by Eric A. Coomes, Humaid O. Al‐Shamsi, and Brandon M. Meyers, et al. on page e1252 of this issue.

References

  • 1. Al‐Shamsi HO, Alhazzani W, Alhuraiji A et al. A practical approach to the management of cancer patients during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic: An international collaborative group. The Oncologist 2020. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Vidal L, Ben Dor I, Paul M et al. Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;9:CD003992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kochanek M, Schalk E, von Bergwelt‐Baildon M et al. Management of sepsis in neutropenic cancer patients: 2018 guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) and Intensive Care Working Party (iCHOP) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). Ann Hematol 2019;98:1051–1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ahn S, Lee YS. Predictive factors for poor prognosis febrile neutropenia. Curr Opin Oncol 2012;24:376–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Liang W, Guan W, Chen R et al. Cancer patients in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: A nationwide analysis in China. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:335–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Oncologist are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES