Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Open Veterinary Journal logoLink to Open Veterinary Journal
. 2020 May 10;10(2):164–177. doi: 10.4314/ovj.v10i2.6

Susceptibility to SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 from animal health perspective

Aasish Gautam 1,*, Krishna Kaphle 2, Birendra Shrestha 1, Samiksha Phuyal 1
PMCID: PMC7419072  PMID: 32821661

Abstract

Viruses are having great time as they seem to have bogged humans down. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) are the three major coronaviruses of present-day global human and animal health concern. COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 is identified as the newest disease, presumably of bat origin. Different theories on the evolution of viruses are in circulation, yet there is no denying the fact that the animal source is the skeleton. The whole world is witnessing the terror of the COVID-19 pandemic that is following the same path of SARS and MERS, and seems to be more severe. In addition to humans, several species of animals are reported to have been infected with these life-threatening viruses. The possible routes of transmission and their zoonotic potentialities are the subjects of intense research. This review article aims to overview the link of all these three deadly coronaviruses among animals along with their phylogenic evolution and cross-species transmission. This is essential since animals as pets or food are said to pose some risk, and their better understanding is a must in order to prepare a possible plan for future havoc in both human and animal health. Although COVID-19 is causing a human health hazard globally, its reporting in animals are limited compared to SARS and MERS. Non-human primates and carnivores are most susceptible to SARS-coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2, respectively, whereas the dromedary camel is susceptible to MERS-coronavirus. Phylogenetically, the trio viruses are reported to have originated from bats and have special capacity to undergo mutation and genomic recombination in order to infect humans through its reservoir or replication host. However, it is difficult to analyze how the genomic pattern of coronaviruses occurs. Thus, increased possibility of new virus-variants infecting humans and animals in the upcoming days seems to be the biggest challenge for the future of the world. One health approach is portrayed as our best way ahead, and understanding the animal dimension will go a long way in formulating such preparedness plans.

Keywords: Animal health, COVID-19, Cross-species, One health, Trio coronaviruses

Introduction

Newer coronaviruses (CoVs) continue to be detected from various wildlife species, most notably the bat (Valitutto et al., 2020). It is a fact that humans and their interaction with wildlife is on an increasing frequency. CoVs infect a variety of animal species causing respiratory, hepatic, enteric, and neurological diseases of varying degrees (Woo et al., 2012). These are traditionally divided into three groups (groups I, II, and III) based on their serological and genomic characterization (Brian and Baric, 2005). The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses proposed replacing the genera for these traditional groups, namely α-coronavirus, β-coronavirus, and γ-coronavirus for group I, II, and III, respectively (Woo et al., 2012). Currently, the new genera δ-coronavirus is also grouped; hence, coronaviruses are grouped under four different genera, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS; Xu et al., 2016). These genera and viruses possess special characteristics to undergo mutation in order to infect a new host and have the capacity to adapt to a new ecological niche (Woo et al., 2012). Thus, understanding these viruses in animals, the eco niche, the mechanism of mutation, and how they spread to other species will be crucial in managing pandemic risks. Research studies have been narrowed down to α- and β-coronaviruses that have originated from the host bats serving as an ancestral origin for mammalian CoVs (Woo et al., 2012). In November 2002, a new type of virus was identified in Guangdong Province of Southern China named SARS-CoV. By the end of the epidemic, around 8,437 human cases with case fatality of 9% was detected (Peeri et al., 2020; Fig. 1). These viruses were isolated from the palm civet and other game–food mammals in June, 2003 with 98.8% nucleotide similarity to SARS-CoV (Cheng et al., 2007). Subsequently, research studies identified the SARS-like coronavirus (SL-CoV) in horseshoe bats acting as a reservoir host and SARS-CoV in several carnivores (civet and raccoon dog) from the Chinese wet market (Bolles et al., 2011; Ge et al., 2013) acting as a replication host (Guan et al., 2003). After SARS, MERS reportedly evolved causing a global health threat in 2012 originating from Saudi Arabia (Mackay and Arden, 2015). Various studies have shown bats as a reservoir host for MERS-CoV since the HKU4 of bats resembeled MERS-CoV genetically (Annan et al., 2013), but alpacas can also act as a potential reservoir for MERS (Mohd et al., 2016). Hemida et al., (2013) reported the genome of human origin MERS-CoV being 99.9% similar to the genome of MERS-CoV affecting dromedaries. It is still unclear how the dromedary camels got infected by MERS-CoV; however, a recent study also supports that MERS-CoV jumped from bats to camels in Africa some 20 years ago and these camels were reportedly imported to the Arabian Peninsula (Corman et al., 2014). Since 2012, around 2,494 health cases of MERS have been reported with 34.4% case fatality (Al-Omari et al., 2019; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Comparison of case fatalities in SARS, MERS, and SARS-CoV-2 as of 17 April 2020. It shows highest case fatality for MERS-CoV.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic is the current concern and is reported to have been detected in later part of the year 2019, hence, named from the wet market in Wuhan city in China. Various opinions on the origin of the virus is in discussion, including the theory of engineered virus spillage. The etiological agent for COVID-19 is SARS-CoV-2 (Tang et al., 2020). The virus is phylogenetically originated from bats (Cui et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020). The recent findings postulated that the SARS-CoV was genetically similar to bat-CoV of subgenus Sarbecovirus (Wu et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020). Thus, the identified genome of COVID-19 has a 96.2% genomic similarity to bat-CoV (RaTG13) in China (Zhou et al., 2020), but has around 79% and 50% genomic similarity to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, respectively (Lu et al., 2020). Anteaters and snakes are also reported to be possible reservoirs for COVID-19 (Ji et al., 2020). COVID-19’s spread is happening globally at this moment, and around 2.2 million counting humans have tested positive with fatality of 6.7% detected since its outbreak until April 17, 2020 (WHO, 2020; Fig. 1). In addition to humans, several animals like cats, dogs, and tigers also tested positive, but no animal to animal or animal to human transmission is reported. The objective of this review article is to summarize all the deadly coronaviruses reported from animals and their possible cross-species transmission pattern along with phylogenetic modification. The objective is to present a concise and updated article for the growing attention on, interest in, and focus on this topic.

Phylogenic Modification

SARS-CoV

SARS appeared for the first time in 2002 in Guangdong Province, Southern China (Hu et al., 2015). After its emergence, SARS-CoV was confirmed in palm civets and horseshoe bats from the wet market in Guangdong Province, as reservoirs of SARS-CoV (Luk et al., 2019). Before the appearance of SARS, around 10 CoVs genome sequences were available and placed into three groups, namely groups I, II, and III. However, later the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses announced three genera for these groups, namely alphacoronavirus, betacoronavirus, and gammacoronavirus (de Groot et al., 2011). The discovery of SARS-CoV in 2003 and its phylogenic evidence placed SARS-CoV into the betacoronavirus, and subsequently, into the subgenus Sarbecovirus (Luk et al., 2019). Among these coronaviruses, the alpha and beta mainly infect mammals, and the assigned species (almost 7 out of 15) of viruses were reported in bats (de Groot et al., 2011). Hence, it is proposed that bats are an important source in the evolutionary analysis (Woo et al., 2012). Phylogenic modification of 16BO133 strain of the bat coronavirus is placed in beta-CoV lineage which is closely related to the JTMC15 strain of the horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) isolated in China (Kim et al., 2019).

MERS-CoV

Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) was classified into the family coronaviridae, subfamily coronavirinae, and genus betacoronavirus (Bayrakdar et al., 2015). The closest ancestors of MERS-CoV, namely SARS-CoV and human CoV-229E, phylogenetically evolved through the Vespertilionidae (insectivorous bat) family and belong to Neoromicia and Pipistrellus (Annan et al., 2013). The Tylonycteris bat coronavirus HKU4 (Ty-BatCoV HKU4) and Pipistrellus bat coronavirus (Pi-BatCoV HKU5) genomes of bat resemble with MERS-CoV, hence, considered as a reservoir host, but alpacas also act as a potential reservoir for MERS-CoV (Mohd et al.,2016. The first report of MERS identified it as a novel betacoronavirus (MERS-CoV) (Zaki et al., 2012). The evolutionary history of MERS-CoV reported its evolution through a genetic recombination of MERS-CoV clade A and B (Wang et al., 2015). This genomic recombination occurred in two groups (groups III and V) among the five phylogenic groups of clade B (Wang et al., 2015).

SARS-CoV-2

Belonging to family Coronaviridae and genus β-coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 shares a similar genetic make-up with Bat-CoV (RaTG13/Beta-CoV) and an almost similar make-up with snakes; hence, considered as a reservoir for COVID-19 (nCoV; Ji et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). Convergent evolution through homologous recombination between this virus and a virus of unknown origin makes it different from the coronavirus of human origin (Ji et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2020). SARS-CoV-2 shares almost a 91.02% character similarity to pangolin-CoV and 90.55% with RaTG13 (Zhang et al., 2020). But the difference in the neutral site of RaTG13 and SARS-CoV-2 is almost 17%, suggesting a much larger divergence between these two viruses than previous estimated study (Tang et al., 2020). The developing variation is due to the variation raised in the Ras-binding domain of the glycoprotein spike, which acts as an angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2), and the genetic mutation of pangolin SARS-CoV is most likely a genetic recombination (Tang et al., 2020). The evolutionary tree indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is closer to RaTG13, followed by the pangolin SARS-CoV (Tang et al., 2020).

Susceptibility in Animal Species

SARS-CoV

In addition to reservoir (horseshoe bat) and replication intermediate (Himalayan palm civet and raccoon dog) hosts, various non-human primates are liable to be infected, causing a fever and quite, mildly labored breathing in aged animals (Smits et al., 2010). The susceptibility of various species with SARS-CoV is shown Table 1.

Table 1. Susceptibility of various animal species to SARS-CoV.

Order Family Animals category Species Detection methods Prevalence References
Primates Cercopithecidae Rhesus macaquec Macaca mulatta Histopathology and radiography 6/6 (Munster et al., 2013)
Cynomolgus macaquec Macaca fascicularis Histopathology 12/12 (Smits et al., 2011)
Canidae Raccoon dogb Nyctereutes procyonoides RT-PCR 15/15 (Kan et al., 2005)
RT-PCR and viral isolation 1/1 (Guan et al., 2003)
Red foxc Vulpes vulpes Real-time RT-PCR 3/5 (Wang et al., 2005)
Chinese ferret-badgerc Melogale moschata Western blot 1/2 (Guan et al., 2003)
Carnivora Mustelidae Hog-badger Arctonyx collaris RT-PCR 0/3 (Guan et al., 2003)
Mink Mustela vison Real-time RT-PCR 0/1 (Wang et al., 2005)
Viverridae Himalayan palm civetb Paguma larvata Viral isolation 4/5 (Guan et al., 2003)
Felidae Domestic cat Felis catus Real-time RT-PCR 0/13 (Wang et al., 2005)
Canidae Domestic dog Canis familiaris ELISA, RT- PCR 0/20 (Chen et al., 2005)
Artiodactyla Suidae Pigc Sus scrofa domesticus RT-PCR, ELISA, Western blotting 2/108 (Chen et al., 2005)
Wild pigc S. scrofa Real-time RT-PCR 1/19 (Wang et al., 2005)
Bovidae Goat Capra hircus Real-time RT-PCR 0/3 (Wang et al., 2005)
Cattle Bos Taurus RT-PCR, ELISA 0/60 (Chen et al., 2005)
Rhodentia Muridae Lesser rice-field ratc Rattus losea Real-time RT-PCR 1/6 (Wang et al., 2005)
Chiroptera Rhinolophidae Horseshoe bata R. ferrumequinum RT-PCR 2/348 (Lau et al., 2015)
Galliformes Phasianidae Chicken Gallus domesticus RT-PCR, ELISA 0/11 (Chen et al., 2005)
Red jungle fowl Gallus gallus Real-time RT-PCR 0/46 (Wang et al., 2005)
Green peafowl Pavo muticus Real-time RT-PCR 0/2 (Wang et al., 2005)
Common pheasant Phasianus colchicus Real-time RT-PCR 0/8 (Wang et al., 2005)
Chinese francolin Francolinus pintadeanus Real-time RT-PCR 0/2 (Wang et al., 2005)
Anseriformes Anatidae Spot-billed Duck Anas platyrhynchos Real-time RT-PCR 0/13 (Wang et al., 2005)
Greylag goose Anser anser Real-time RT-PCR 0/12 (Wang et al., 2005)
Duck A. platyrhynchos Domesticus RT-PCR, ELISA 0/30 (Chen et al., 2005)
Open in a new tab

RT-PCR = reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

a

SL-CoV acts as a reservoir host.

b

SARS-CoV in several carnivores (civet and raccoon dog) acts as a replication host for SARS-CoV.

c

Other animals susceptible to SARS-CoV.

MERS-CoV

The life-threatening diseases of humans somehow have possible links with the animal species. MERS, although recognized as a disease of the dromedary camels, causes asymptomatic or mild respiratory distress (Hemida et al., 2014), mild fever, and rhinorrhea (Adney et al., 2014). Various other animal species are also found susceptible to MERS-CoV (Table 2). The virus causes mild respiratory problems (respiratory discharges, coughing, sneezing), fever, and loss of appetite in animals (Hemida et al., 2014).

Table 2. Susceptibility of various animal species to MERS CoV.

Order Family Animal category Species Detection method Prevalence References
Primates Cercopithecidae Rhesus macaquec M. mulatta Quantitative RT-PCR 6/6 (de Wit et al., 2013)
Artiodactyla+ Camelidae Llamasc Lama glama Immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization 3/4 (Vergara-Alert et al., 2017a)
Dromedary camelb Camelus dromedaries RT-qPCR, RT-PCR 5/76 (Nowotny and Kolodziejek, 2014)
RT-PCR 2/14 (Haagmans et al., 2014)
RT-qPCR 126/131 (Chu et al., 2015)
MERS-CoV S1 ELISA 502/570 (Falzarano et al., 2017)
Viral neutralization assay 65/155 (Reusken et al., 2013)
Alpacaa Vicugna pacos ELISA, VNT 35/102 (David et al., 2018)
Suidae Pigc S. scorfa domesticus Immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization 2/4 (Vergara-Alert et al., 2017a)
Viral neutralization assay 4/5 (Vergara-Alert et al., 2017b)
Bovidae Cattlec B. taurus Plate reduction neutralization test (PRNT), RT-PCR 1/53 (Kandeil et al., 2019)
Sheepc Ovis aries Viral neutralization assay 0/40 (Reusken et al., 2013)
Plate reduction neutralization test (PRNT), RT-PCR 35/63 (Kandeil et al., 2019)
Goatc C. hircus Viral neutralization assay 0/50 (Reusken et al., 2013)
Plate reduction neutralization test (PRNT), RT-PCR 5/121 (Kandeil et al., 2019)
Lagomorpha Leporidae Rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus RT-qPCR 0/12 (Widagdo et al., 2019)
Chiroptera Emballonuridae Bata Taphozous perforatus PCR 1/94 (Memish et al., 2013)
Eidolon helvum PCR 1/82 (Memish et al., 2013)
Vespertilionidae Common wing-bent batc Miniopterus schreibersii RT-PCR 4/53 (Luo et al., 2018)
Japanese pipistrellec Pipistrellus abramus 15/75 (Luo et al., 2018)
Asian particolored batc Vespertilio superans 34/159 (Luo et al., 2018)
Perissodactyla Equidae Donkeyc Equus africanus Plate reduction neutralization test (PRNT), RT-PCR 3/42 (Kandeil et al., 2019)
Horsec Equus ferus VMN 1/2 (Kandeil et al., 2019)
Galliformes Phasianidae Chicken G. domesticus pseudoparticle neutralization test (ppNT) 0/240 (Hemida et al., 2013)
Open in a new tab

RT-PCR = reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; RT qPCR = quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; VNT = virus neutralization test; VMN = virus microneutralization.

a

Bat and alpacas are considered as a reservoir host for MERS-CoV.

b

Dromedary camel acting as an animal host to transmit virus to animals.

c

Other animals susceptible to MERS-CoV.

COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2)

The following questions were unknown to scientists during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Does the virus infect animals as well as humans? If yes, what types of animals are more susceptible? Does the virus transmit from animals to humans? At the same time, a report from Hong Kong showed that one Pomeranian tested weakly positive, after which one German shepherd tested positive to SARS-CoV-2 (Cohut, 2020). A report from Belgium also reported SARS-CoV-2 in cats (Jeanna, 2020a). These reports suggest the chance of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from humans to animals. Because of the contradictory information regarding the possibility of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in animals, scientists from Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, and the National High Containment Laboratory for Animal Diseases Control and Prevention gathered together and analyzed its susceptibility in different animals. They concluded that cats and ferrets are the most susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infections, but virus multiplication in dogs, pigs, chickens, and ducks are poor, and there was no intraspecies and interspecies transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from dogs, pigs, chickens, and ducks (Shi et al., 2020; Table 3). Wild animals are also susceptible to SARS-CoV-2. The US Wildlife Conservation Society announced on April 5, 2020, cases in a 4-year-old female Malayan tiger together with her sister, two Amur tigers, and three African lions (Jeanna, 2020b).

Table 3. Susceptibility of various animal species to SARS-CoV-2a.

Order Family Animals category Species Sample Detection methods Prevalence References
Carnivore Mustelidae Ferrets Mustela putorius Nasal swab qPCR, ELISA 6/6 (Shi et al., 2020)
Nasal turbinate, soft palate, and tonsils 4/4
Felidae Cat F. catus Nasal turbinate, soft palate, tonsil, and trachea qPCR, ELISA 5/5 (Shi et al., 2020)
Canidae Dog C. familiaris Rectal and esophageal swab qPCR, ELISA 2/5 (Shi et al., 2020)
Artiodactyla Suidae Pig S. scorfa domesticus Rectal and esophageal swab qPCR, ELISA 0/5 (Shi et al., 2020)
Anseriformes Anatidae Duck A. platyrhynchos domesticus Rectal and esophageal swab qPCR, ELISA 0/5 (Shi et al., 2020)
Galliformes Phasianidae Chicken G. domesticus Rectal and esophageal swab qPCR, ELISA 0/5 (Shi et al., 2020)
Open in a new tab

qPCR = quantitative polymerase chain reaction; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

a

This table does not include bat and pangolin.

Bats are supposed to be the natural reservoir for the SARS-CoV-2 because the virus shares a 96% genomic identity to the bat coronavirus and their protein sequence shares a similarity to SARS-CoV (Zhou et al., 2020). Recent findings that analyze the probable animal reservoir to COVID-19 suggest the snake as a reservoir, based on relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) bias (Ji et al., 2020). The missing link or intermediate link for animal to human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from a recent study suggests the DNA and protein sequence of Malayan pangolins (Zhang et al., 2020).

Cross-Species Transmission

SARS-CoV

A unique virus was isolated from the palm civet and other game–food mammals in June, 2003, with 98.8% nucleotide similarity to SARS-CoV (Cheng et al., 2007). Subsequently, research studies have identified SL-CoV in horseshoe bat acting as a reservoir host, and SARS-CoV in several carnivores (civet and raccoon dog) from the Chinese wet market (Bolles et al., 2011; Ge et al., 2013) acting as a replication host (Guan et al., 2003; Fig. 2). Later, one asymptomatic and four symptomatic cases of SARS were reported from December 16, 2003 to January 8, 2004 in Guangdong Province, China, which were similar to SARS-CoV of animal origin (Cheng et al., 2007). Chen et al. (2005) reported the transmission of SARS-CoV of human origin to pigs. Ge et al. (2013) provided the solid evidence of horseshoe bats acting as a reservior host and the virus acting as a cellular receptor ACE-2 in both bats and humans. The analysis of spike glycoprotein for receptor ACE-2 indicated that amino acid 487 was responsible for the spike ACE-2 interaction. Its mutation appeared to be responsible for the human to human transmission of SARS-CoV (Li et al., 2005).

Fig. 2. The summarized information suggests that bats acted as a reservoir host for SARS-CoV, and initially jumped to palm civet and subsequently into humans (black arrows). Phylogenetic study suggested direct transmission from bats to humans and possible cross-transmission between palm civet and humans (red arrows).

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

MERS-CoV

Various studies have shown bats as a reservior host for MERS-CoV since the HKU4 of bats resembeled MERS-CoV genetically (Annan et al., 2013), but alpacas also act as a potential reservior for MERS (Mohd et al., 2016). Humans get infected when MERS-CoV spike attaches to the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) of the human receptor. Both HKU4 and MERS-CoV are attached to the DPP4 receptor, but the HKU4 requires the host endogenous protesase for activation in humans, and only MERS-CoV can mediate its entry into the human cell (Yang et al., 2014). But the mutation of HKU4 in S246R and N762A possesses a special capacity to enter inside the human cell receptor (Yang et al., 2015). A two-fold mutation of HKU4 adaptive for its attachement to the endogenous cellular protease supports the role of bats in the transmission cycle either directly or by amplyfying the host in humans (Yang et al., 2015). Hemida et al. (2014) reported that the genome of human origin MERS-CoV is 99.9% similar to the genome of MERS-CoV afffecting the dromedary camels. It is still unclear how the dromedary camels got infected with MERS-CoV; but a recent study supports that MERS-CoV jumped to the camel from bat-CoV in Africa 20 years ago and these camels from Africa were imported to the Arabian Peninsula (Corman et al., 2014). The evidence of the transmission of MERS-CoV from dromedary camels to humans was reported in October 2013 in Qatar (Haagmans et al., 2014) and in November 2013 in Saudi Arabia (Azhar et al., 2014). These findings also support the possible infection in humans through dromedary camels (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Bat and alpacas are considered as a reservoir host for MERS-CoV. Dromedary camel acting as an animal host to transmit virus to animals (red arrows). But recent studies show the mutation of the MERS-CoV spike of reservoir host in bat to human transmission (black arrows).

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

SARS-CoV-2

Bats are supposed to be the natural reservoir of the SARS-CoV-2 since they share a 96% genomic identity with bat coronavirus and their protein sequence shares a similarity to SARS-CoV (Zhou et al., 2020). However, snakes are the recently reported possible reservoirs for COVID-19 (Ji et al., 2020). In humans, COVID-19 is developed from a homologous recombination of cell surface receptors recognizing the glycoprotein spike of the bat virus and a new virus of unknown origin (Ji et al., 2020). This homologous recombination of the glycoprotein spike in bats and snakes contributes to the cross-species transmission from animals to humans (Ji et al., 2020) (Fig. 4). A recent study reported that the DNA and protein sequence of Malayan pangolins share a 91.02% similarity to SARS-CoV-2, acting as an intermediate link or missing link for cross-species transmission (Zhang et al., 2020). Cats are also susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, since the cellular receptor ACE2 protein for entry of SARS-CoV-2 in humans resembles the feline homologue ACE2 (Jeanna, 2020a). The information on the cross-transmission model of SARS CoV-2 is still contradictory; however, a previous study on SARS-CoV showed possible transmission of SARS-virus from infected cats to humans (Martina et al., 2003). A team of virologist, led by Bu Zhigao, reported on intraspecies transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in cats through respiratory droplets, but the actual mode of transmission in those cats is unclear; however, it could be through the virus secreted in the urine or feces (Mallapaty, 2020a, 2020b). Steven Van Gucht, a virologist from Belgium, told Live Science the possible interspecies transmission of COVID-19 from humans to cats because a week after the owner got sick the cat tested positive (Jeanna, 2020a). Virologist Linda Saif says there is no direct evidence that the coronavirus in the secretion of cats infects humans (Mallapaty, 2020b). Shi et al. (2020) reported no intraspecies and interspecies transmission of COVID-19 from dogs, pigs, chickens, and ducks.

Fig. 4. A recent report showed bats and snakes acting as reservoirs for SARS-CoV-2 and Malayan pangolin as a jumping link (red arrows). Humans get infected either from the recombination of the reservoir host virus with an unknown virus (black arrows) or from the intermediate link (red arrows).

Fig. 4.

Open in a new tab

Conclusion

Bats cause various life-threatening diseases in both animal- and human-like SARS (SARS-CoV), MERS (MERS-CoV), Ebola virus, Nipah virus, Hendra virus, and Murburg virus (Han et al., 2015). Recently, COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 was identified as a newest disease of bat origin (Zhou et al., 2020). Research studies have identified SL-CoV in horseshoe bats and palm civets from the Chinese wet market named SARS-CoV (Bolles et al., 2011; Ge et al., 2013). Horseshoe bats act as a reservoir for this virus, but it is difficult to understand this characteristic properly in wild animals because of their genetic diversity. Moreover, other animals, like the red fox, Chinese ferret-badger, pig, wild pig, and lesser field rats, are also susceptible to SARS-CoV (Table 1 and Fig. 5). MERS caused by MERS-CoV originated in Saudi Arabia, a direct ancestor of SARS-CoV, also originated from bats (Annan et al., 2013). In addition to bats, alpacas also act as a potential reservoir for MERS-CoV, and the dromedary camels act as a host to transmit virus to humans (Table 2), since MERS-CoV spike is attached to the DPP4 human receptor (Yang et al., 2014). Other animals, like the rhesus macaque, llamas, pig, cattle, sheep, goat, donkey, and horse, are also susceptible to MERS-CoV (Table 2 and Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. Various animal species susceptible to coronaviruses. It shows that bats are common for all, acting as a reservoir host.

Fig. 5.

Open in a new tab

The novel outbreak causing respiratory illness in global human health is caused by COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2; Peeri et al., 2020). Bats are common ancestors for all the deadly coronaviruses. SARS-CoV-2 also shares a 96% genomic similarity to bat-CoV (Ji et al., 2020). Hence, bats act as a reservoir for COVID-19. The virus also has characteristics to undergo genomic recombination as SARS-CoV between glycoprotein spike of the bat virus and a virus of unknown origin. The recombinant virus of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV acts on the ACE-2 receptor of humans (Jeanna, 2020a). In addition to humans, animals, like cats and ferrets, are also most susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, but its multiplication in dogs, pigs, chickens, and ducks are poor (Shi et al., 2020; Table 3 and Fig. 5). Clinical presentation, laboratory findings, histopathology, and detection methods of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV infections in animals according to the published series are presented in Table 4. It is very difficult to understand how the genomic pattern occurs among these coronaviruses, in order to make an effective plan for control and prevention. There is increased possibility of new virus-variants infecting animals and humans in the upcoming days which seems to be the biggest challenge for the future of the world.

Table 4. Clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV infections in animals according to published series.

Virus SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV MERS-CoV
Clinical presentation Cat: loss of appetite, vomition, diarrhea, respiratory problem (Jeanna, 2020a) conjunctivitis, and severe ocular implication (Seah and Agrawal, 2020) Non-human primates: fever, quite, mildly labored breathing in aged animals (Smits et al., 2010). Dromedary camels: asymptomatic with mild respiratory distress (Hemida et al., 2014), mild fever, and rhinorrhea (Adney et al., 2014).
Tiger, Lions: cough and loss of appetite (Jeanna, 2020b) Calves: mild respiratory problems (respiratory discharges, coughing, sneezing), fever, appetite loss (Hemida et al., 2014).
Ferrets: fever and loss of appetite (Shi et al., 2020).
Laboratory findings Ferrets: vasculitis and perivasculitis of alveolar lumen (Shi et al., 2020). Cat: Mild to severe interstitial pneumonitis (Roberts et al., 2008) Dromedary camels: intraepithelial and submucosal inflammation with multifocal necrosis of respiratory of URT and LRT (Adney et al., 2014).
Histopathology Ferrets: type II neutrophils, macrophages, pneumocytes in respiratory mucosa, and alveolar septa (Shi et al., 2020).
Cat: loss of cilia with lymphocytic infiltration in respiratory mucosa and alveolar wall (Shi et al., 2020). 		Cat: Perivascular and peribronchiolar mononuclear infiltration, intraluminal necrotic debris in trachea, and interstitial pneumonia (Roberts et al., 2008) Dromedary camels: multifocal squamous and pseudostratified degeneration with metaplasia of nasal turbinate, trachea, and bronchus with neutrophilic infiltration, absence of goblet cells, and nuclear regimentation (Adney et al., 2014).
Detection method Real-time RT-PCR (Corman et al., 2020) RT-PCR (Martina et al., 2003) qRT-PCR (de Wit et al., 2013)
Open in a new tab

URT = upper respiratory tract; LRT = lower respiratory tract; RT-PCR = reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; qRT-PCR = quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adney D.R, Doremalen N, Van Brown V.R, Bushmaker T, Scott D, Wit E, de Bowen R.A, Munster V.J. Replication and shedding of MERS-CoV in upper respiratory tract of inoculated dromedary camels. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014;20:1999–2005. doi: 10.3201/eid2012.141280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Omari A, Rabaan A.A, Salih S, Al-Tawfiq J.A, Memish Z.A. MERS coronavirus outbreak: implications for emerging viral infections. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019;93:265–285. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Annan A, Baldwin H.J, Corman V.M, Klose S.M, Owusu M, Nkrumah E.E, Badu E.K, Anti P, Agbenyega O, Meyer B, Oppong S, Sarkodie Y.A, Kalko E.K. V, Lina P.H.C, Godlevska E. V, Reusken C, Seebens A, Gloza-rausch F, Vallo P, Tschapka M, Drosten C, Drexler J.F. Human betacoronavirus 2c EMC/2012–related viruses in Bats, Ghana and Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013;19:456–459. doi: 10.3201/eid1903.121503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Azhar E.I, El-kafrawy S.A, Farraj S.A, Hassan A.M, Al-saeed M.S, Hashem A.M, Madani T.A. Evidence for camel-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:2499–2505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayrakdar F, Altaş A.B, Korukluoğlu G, Topal S. Molecular diagnosis and phylogenetic analysis of the first MERS case in Turkey. Mikrobiyol. Bul. 2015;49:414–442. doi: 10.5578/mb.9247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolles M, Donaldson E, Baric R. SARS-CoV and emergent coronaviruses: viral determinants of interspecies transmission. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2011;1:624–634. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2011.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brian D.A, Baric R.S. Coronavirus genome structure and replication. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2005;287:1–30. doi: 10.1007/3-540-26765-4_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen W, Yan M, Yang L, Ding B, He B, Wang Y, Liu X, Liu C, Zhu H, You B, Huang S, Zhang J, Mu F, Xiang Z, Feng X, Wen J, Fang J, Yu J, Yang H, Wang J. SARS-associated transmitted from coronavirus human to pig. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005;11:446–448. doi: 10.3201/eid1103.040824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng V.C.C, Lau S.K.P, Woo P.C.Y, Kwok Y.Y. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007;20:660–694. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00023-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chu D.K, Oladipo J.O, Perera R.A, Kuranga S.A, Chan S.M, Poon L.L, Peiris M. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS- CoV) in dromedary camels in Nigeria, 2015. Euro Surveill. 2015;20:30086. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.49.30086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohut M. Cats may be able to contract SARS-CoV-2, but evidence is limited. MEDICALNEWSTODAY. 2020. [6 April 2020]. Available via https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/cats-may-be-able-to-contract-sars-cov-2-but-evidence-is-limited .
  12. Corman V.M, Ithete N.L, Richards R, Schoeman M.C, Preiser W, Drosten C, Drexler J.F. Rooting the phylogenetic tree of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus by characterization of a conspecific virus from an African bat. J. Virol. 2014;88:11297–11303. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01498-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Corman V.M, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu D.K.W, Bleicker T, Schneider J, Schmidt M.L, Mulders D.G.J.C, Haagmans B.L, Veer B, Van Der Den S, Van Wijsman L, Goderski G, Ellis J, Zambon M, Peiris M, Goossens H, Reusken C, Koopmans M.P.G, Drosten C. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020;25:2000045. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cui J, Li F, Shi Z.-L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17:181–192. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0118-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. David D, Rotenberg D, Khinich E, Erster O, Bardenstein S, van Straten M, Okba N.M.A, Raj S. V, Haagmans B.L, Miculitzki M, Davidson I. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus specific antibodies in naturally exposed Israeli llamas, alpacas and camels. One Heal. 2018;5:65–68. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Groot R.J, Baker S.C, Baric R, Enjuanes L, Gorbalenya A, Holmes K.V, Perlman S, Poon L, Rottier P.J, Talbot P.J, Woo P.C, Ziebuhr J. Virus taxonomy, classification and nomenclature of viruses. Ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses, International Union of Microbiological Societies, Virology Division. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2011. Coronaviridae. [Google Scholar]
  17. de Wit E, Rasmussen A.L, Falzarano D, Bushmaker T, Feldmann F, Brining D.L, Fischer E.R, Martellaro C, Okumura A, Chang J, Scott D, Benecke A.G, Katze M.G, Feldmann H, Munster V.J. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERSCoV) causes transient lower respiratory tract infection in rhesus macaques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013;110:16598–16603. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310744110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Falzarano D, Kamissoko B, de Wit E, Maïga O, Cronin J, Samaké K, Traoré A, Milne-Price S, Munster V.J, Sogoba N, Niang M, Safronetz D, Feldmann H. Dromedary camels in northern Mali have high seropositivity to MERS-CoV. One Heal. 2017;3:41–43. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ge X, Li J, Yang X, Chmura A.A, Zhu G, Epstein J.H, Mazet J.K, Hu B, Zhang W, Peng C, Zhang Y, Luo C, Tan B, Wang N, Zhu Y, Crameri G, Zhang S, Wang L, Daszak P, Shi Z. Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor. Nature. 2013;503:535–538. doi: 10.1038/nature12711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guan Y, Zheng B.J, He Y.Q, Liu X.L, Zhuang Z.X, Cheung C.L, Luo S.W, Li P.H, Zhang L.J, Guan Y.J, Butt K.M, Wong K.L, Chan K.W, Lim W, Shortridge K.F, Yuen K.Y, Peiris J.S.M, Poon L.L.M. Isolation and characterization of viruses related to the SARS coronavirus from animals in Southern China. Science. 2003;302:276–278. doi: 10.1126/science.1087139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haagmans B.L, Al Dhahiry S.H.S, Reusken C.B.E.M, Raj V.S, Galiano M, Myers R, Godeke G.J, Jonges M, Farag E, Diab A, Ghobashy H, Alhajri F, Al-Thani M, Al-Marri S.A, Al Romaihi H.E, Al Khal A, Bermingham A, Osterhaus A.D.M.E, AlHajri M.M, Koopmans M.P.G. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in dromedary camels: an outbreak investigation. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014;14:140–145. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70690-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Han H, Wen H, Zhou C, Chen F, Luo L, Liu J, Yu X. Bats as reservoirs of severe emerging infectious diseases. Virus Res. 2015;205:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hemida M.G, Chu D.K, Poon L.L, Perera R.A, Alhammadi M.A, Ng H.Y, Siu L.Y, Guan Y, Alnaeem A, Peiris M. MERS coronavirus in dromedary camel herd, Saudi Arabia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014;20:1231–1234. doi: 10.3201/eid2007.140571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hemida M.G, Perera R.A, Wang P, Alhammadi M.A, Siu L.Y, Li M, Poon L.L, Saif L, Alnaeem A, Peiris M. Middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus seroprevalence in domestic livestock in Saudi Arabia, 2010 to 2013. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:20659. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2013.18.50.20659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hu B, Ge X, Wang L, Shi Z. Bat origin of human coronaviruses. Virol. J. 2015;12:221. doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0422-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jeanna B. Cat infected with COVID-19 from owner in Belgium. Live Sci. 2020a. [6 April 2020]. Available via http://www.livescience.com/cat-infected-covid-19-from-owner.html .
  27. Jeanna B. Bronx Zoo tiger infected with COVID-19. Live Sci. 2020b. [6 April 2020]. Available via http://www.livescience.com/tiger-bronx-zoo-has-covid-19.html .
  28. Ji W, Wang W, Zhao X, Zai J, Li X. Cross-species transmission of the newly identified coronavirus 2019-nCoV. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:433–440. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kan B, Wang M, Jing H, Xu H, Jiang X, Yan M, Liang W, Zheng H, Wan K, Liu Q, Cui B, Xu Y, Zhang E, Wang H, Ye J, Li G, Li M, Cui Z, Qi X, Chen K, Du L, Gao K, Zhao Y.-T, Zou X.-Z, Feng Y.-J, Gao Y.-F, Hai R, Yu D, Guan Y, Xu J. Molecular evolution analysis and geographic investigation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in palm civets at an animal market and on farms. J. Virol. 2005;79:11892–11900. doi: 10.1128/jvi.79.18.11892-11900.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kandeil A, Gomaa M, Shehata M, El-Taweel A, Kayed A.E, Abiadh A, Jrijer J, Moatasim Y, Kutkat O, Bagato O, Mahmoud S, Mostafa A, El-Shesheny R, Perera R.A.P.M, Ko R.L.W, Hassan N, Elsokary B, Allal L, Saad A, Sobhy H, McKenzie P.P, Webby R.J, Peiris M, Ali M.A, Kayali G. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in non-camelid domestic mammals. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019;8:103–108. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2018.1560235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim Y, Son K, Kim Y.-S, Lee S.-Y, Jheong W, Oem J.-K. Complete genome analysis of a SARS - like bat coronavirus identified in the Republic of Korea. Virus Genes. 2019;55:545–549. doi: 10.1007/s11262-019-01668-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lau S.K.P, Feng Y, Chen H, Luk H.K.H, Yang W.-H, Li K.S.M, Zhang Y.-Z, Huang Y, Song Z.-Z, Chow W.-N, Fan R.Y.Y, Ahmed S.S, Yeung H.C, Lam C.S.F, Cai J.-P, Wong S.S.Y, Chan J.F.W, Yuen K.-Y, Zhang H.-L, Woo P.C.Y. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus ORF8 protein is acquired from SARS-related coronavirus from greater horseshoe bats through recombination. J. Virol. 2015;89:10532–10547. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01048-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li W, Zhang C, Sui J, Kuhn J.H, Moore M.J, Luo S, Wong S.K, Murakami A. Receptor and viral determinants of SARS-coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J. 2005;24:1634–1643. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li X, Song Y, Cui J. Bat origin of a new human coronavirus: there and back again. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020;63:461–462. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1645-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, Wang W, Song H, Huang B, Zhu N, Bi Y, Ma X, Zhan F, Wang L, Hu T, Zhou H, Hu Z, Zhou W, Zhao L, Chen J, Meng Y, Wang J, Lin Y, Yuan J, Xie Z, Ma J, Liu W.J, Wang D, Xu W, Holmes E.C, Gao G.F, Wu G, Chen W, Shi W, Tan W. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395:565–574. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Luk H.K.H, Li X, Fung J, Lau S.K.P, Woo P.C.Y. Molecular epidemiology, evolution and phylogeny of SARS coronavirus. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019;71:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Luo C.-M, Wang N, Yang X.-L, Liu H.-Z, Zhang W, Li B, Hu B, Peng C, Geng Q.-B, Zhu G.-J, Li F, Shi Z.-L. Discovery of novel bat coronaviruses in South China that use the same receptor as middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 2018;92:e00116–18. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00116-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mackay I.M, Arden K.E. MERS coronavirus: diagnostics, epidemiology and transmission. Virol. J. 2015;12:222. doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0439-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mallapaty S. Cats can get coronavirus, study suggests–but pet owners need not panic. Nat. Mag. 2020a. [7 April 2020]. Available via https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cats-can-get-coronavirus-study-suggests-but-pet-owners-need-not-panic/
  40. Mallapaty S. Coronavirus can infect cats – dogs, not so much. Nature. 2020b. [17 April 2020]. Available via https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00984-8 . [DOI] [PubMed]
  41. Martina B.E.E, Haagmans B.L, Kuiken T, Fouchier R.A.M, Rimmelzwaan G.F, Van Amerongen G, Peiris J.S.M, Lim W, Osterhaus A.D.M.E. SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets. Nature. 2003;425:915. doi: 10.1038/425915a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Memish Z.A, Mishra N, Olival K.J, Fagbo S.F, Kapoor V, Epstein J.H, AlHakeem R, Al Asmari M, Islam A, Kapoor A, Briese T, Daszak P, Al Rabeeah A.A, Lipkin W.I. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in Bats, Saudi Arabia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013;19:1819–1823. doi: 10.3201/eid1911.131172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mohd H.A, Al-tawfiq J.A, Memish Z.A. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) origin and animal reservoir. Virol. J. 2016;13:87. doi: 10.1186/s12985-016-0544-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Munster V.J, de Wit E, Feldmann H. Pneumonia from human coronavirus in a macaque model. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:1560–1562. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1302436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nowotny N, Kolodziejek J. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in dromedary camels, Oman, 2013. Euro Surveill. 2014;19:29781. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.16.20781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Peeri N, Bibi S, Rahman M.S, Mehdi B. The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned? Int. J. Epidemiol. 2020 doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa033. pii: dyaa033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Reusken C.B.E.M, Haagmans B.L, Müller M.A, Gutierrez C, Godeke G.J, Meyer B, Muth D, Raj V.S, Vries L. S, De Corman V.M, Drexler J.F, Smits S.L, El Tahir Y.E, De Sousa R, van Beek J, Nowotny N, van Maanen K, Hidalgo-Hermoso E, Bosch B.J, Rottier P, Osterhaus A, Gortázar-Schmidt C, Drosten C, Koopmans M.P.G. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralising serum antibodies in dromedary camels: a comparative serological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013;13:859–866. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70164-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Roberts A, Lamirande E.W, Vogel L, Jackson J.P, Paddock C.D, Guarner J, Zaki S.R, Sheahan T, Baric R, Subbarao K. Animal models and vaccines for SARS-CoV infection. Virus Res. 2008;133:20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Seah I, Agrawal R. Can the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affect the eyes? A review of coronaviruses and ocular implications in humans and animals. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2020;28(3):1–5. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2020.1738501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shi J, Wen Z, Zhong G, Yang H, Wang C, Huang B, Liu R, He X, Shuai L, Sun Z, Zhao Y, Liu P, Liang L, Cui P, Wang J, Zhang X, Guan Y, Tan W, Wu G, Chen H, Bu Z. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and different domestic animals to SARS-coronavirus-2. Science. 2020;pii:eabb7015. doi: 10.1126/science.abb7015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Smits S.L, De Lang A, Van Den Brand J.M.A, Leijten L.M, Van Ijcken W.F, Eijkemans M.J.C, Van Amerongen G, Kuiken T, Andeweg A.C, Osterhaus A.D.M.E, Haagmans B.L. Exacerbated innate host response to SARS-CoV in aged non-human primates. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000756. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Smits S.L, van den Brand J.M.A, de Lang A, Leijten L.M.E, van IJcken W.F, van Amerongen G, Osterhaus A.D.M.E, Andeweg A.C, Haagmans B.L. Distinct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury pathways in two different nonhuman primate species. J. Virol. 2011;85:4234–4245. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02395-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sun J, He W, Wang L, Lai A, Ji X, Zhai X, Li G, Suchard M.A, Tian J, Zhou J, Veit M, Su S. COVID-19: epidemiology, evolution, and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Trends Mol. Med. 2020;26:483–495. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2020.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tang X, Wu C, Li X, Song Y, Yao X, Wu X, Duan Y, Zhang H, Wang Y, Qian Z, Cui J, Lu J. On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020 doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Valitutto M, Aung O, Tun K, Vodzak M.E, Zimmerman D, Yu J, Win Y.T, Maw M.T, Thein W.Z, Win H, Dhanota J, Ontiveros V, Smith B, Tremeau-Brevard A, Goldstein T, Johnson C.K, Murray S, Mazet J. Detection of novel coronaviruses in bats in Myanmar. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0230802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vergara-Alert J, Raj V.S, Muñoz M, Abad F.X, Cordón I, Haagmans B.L, Bensaid A, Segalés J. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus experimental transmission using a pig model. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017b;64:1342–1345. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Vergara-Alert Júlia, van den Brand J.M.A, Widagdo W, Muñoz M, Raj V.S, Schipper D, Solanes D, Cordón I, Bensaid A, Haagmans B.L, Segalés J. Livestock susceptibility to infection with middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017a;23:232–240. doi: 10.3201/eid2302.161239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang M, Jing H, Xu H, Jiang X, Kan B, Liu Q, Wan K, Cui B, Zheng H, Cui Z, Yan M, Liang W, Wang H, Qi X, Li Z, Li M, Chen K, Zhang E, Zhang S, Hai R, Yu D, Xu J. Surveillance on severe acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus in animals at a live animal market of Guangzhou in 2004. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2005;26:84–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang Y, Liu D, Shi W, Lu R, Wang W, Zhao Y, Deng Y, Zhou W, Ren H, Wu J, Wang Yu, Wu G, Gao G.F, Tan W. Origin and possible genetic recombination of the middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus from the first imported case in China: phylogenetics and coalescence analysis. MBio. 2015;6:e01280–15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01280-15.Editor. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. WHO. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation report – 88. 2020. [18 April 2020]. Available via http://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200417-sitrep-88-covid-191b6cccd94f8b4f219377bff55719a6ed.pdf?sfvrsn=ebe78315_6 .
  61. Widagdo W, Okba N.M.A, Richard M, De Meulder D, Bestebroer T.M, Lexmond P, Farag E.A.B.A, Al-Hajri M, Stittelaar K.J, De Waal L, Van Amerongen G, Van Den Brand J.M.A, Haagmans B.L, Herfst S. Lack of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus transmission in rabbits. Viruses. 2019;11:381. doi: 10.3390/v11040381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Woo P.C.Y, Lau S.K.P, Lam C.S.F, Lau C.C.Y, Tsang A.K.L, Lau J.H.N, Bai R, Teng J.L.L, Tsang C.C.C, Wang M, Zheng B, Chan K, Yuen K. Discovery of seven novel mammalian and avian coronaviruses in the genus deltacoronavirus supports bat coronaviruses as the gene source of alphacoronavirus and betacoronavirus and avian coronaviruses as the gene source of gammacoronavirus and deltacoronavirus. J. Virol. 2012;86:3995–4008. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06540-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wu A, Peng Y, Huang B, Ding X, Wang X, Niu P, Meng J, Zhu Z, Zhang Z, Wang J, Sheng J, Quan L, Xia Z, Tan W, Cheng G, Jiang T. Genome composition and divergence of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating in China. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:328. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Xu L, Zhang F, Yang W, Jiang T, Lu G, He B, Li X, Hu T, Chen G, Feng Y, Zhang Y, Fan Q, Feng J, Zhang H, Tu C. Detection and characterization of diverse alpha- and betacoronaviruses from bats in China. Virol. Sin. 2016;31:69–77. doi: 10.1007/s12250-016-3727-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Xu X, Chen P, Wang J, Feng J, Zhou H, Li X, Zhong W, Hao P. Evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing Wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for risk of human transmission. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020;63:457–460. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1637-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Yang Y, Du L, Liu C, Wang L, Tang J, Baric R.S, Jiang S, Li F. Receptor usage and cell entry of bat coronavirus HKU4 provide insight into bat-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014;111:12516–12521. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405889111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Yang Y, Liu C, Du L, Jiang S, Shi Z, Baric R.S, Li F. Two mutations were critical for bat-to-human transmission of Middle East respiratory syndrome coromavirus. J. Virol. 2015;89:9119–9123. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01279-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zaki A.M, Van Boheemen S, Bestebroer T.M, Osterhaus A.D, Fouchier R.A. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:1814–1820. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhang T, Wu Q, Zhang Z. Probable pangolin origin of SARS-CoV-2 associated with the COVID-19 outbreak. Curr. Biol. 2020;30:1346–1351. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhou P, Yang X, Lou Wang X.G, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si H.R, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang C.L, Chen H.D, Chen J, Luo Y, Guo H, Jiang R, Di Liu M.Q, Chen Y, Shen X.R, Wang X, Zheng X.S, Zhao K, Chen Q.J, Deng F, Liu L.L, Yan B, Zhan F.X, Wang Y.Y, Xiao G.F, Shi Z.L. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Open Veterinary Journal are provided here courtesy of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli

RESOURCES