Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;9:e59407. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59407

Table 1. Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics.

Data collection and processing
Magnification 105000
Voltage (kV) 300
Electron exposure (e-2) 85
Defocus range (μm) 0.6–2.3
Pixel size (Å) 0.84
Symmetry imposed C1
Initial particle images (no.) 889272
Final particle images (no.) 285688
Map resolution (Å) 2.98
FSC threshold 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 2.85–4.2
Refinement Monomer Dimer
Initial model used (PDB code) 6CFW, 4HEA 6CFW, 4HEA
Model resolution (Å) 2.97 3.04
FSC threshold 0.5 0.5
Map sharpening B factor (Å) −42, local resolution-filtered −42
Model composition
Non-hydrogen atoms 15448 30250
Protein residues 1873 3730
Ligands 510 1020
Waters 242 0
B factors (Å2)
Protein 88.4 74.4
Ligand 139.1 123.4
Waters 89.8 N/A
R.m.s. deviations
Bond lengths (Å) 0.0080 0.0078
Bond angles (°) 1.32 1.33
Validation
MolProbity score 1.47 1.31
Clashscore 3.58 2.17
Poor rotamers (%) 0.13 0.10
Ramachandran plot
Favoured (%) 95.44 95.45
Allowed (%) 4.56 4.55
Disallowed (%) 0 0
EMRinger score 3.73 3.61