Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Aug 11;10:13542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70156-1

Vanishing fine structure splitting in highly asymmetric InAs/InP quantum dots without wetting layer

Michał Zieliński 1,
PMCID: PMC7419534  PMID: 32782273

Abstract

Contrary to simplified theoretical models, atomistic calculations presented here reveal that sufficiently large in-plane shape elongation of quantum dots can not only decrease, but even reverse the splitting of the two lowest optically active excitonic states. Such a surprising cancellation of bright-exciton splitting occurs for shape-anisotropic nanostructures with realistic elongation ratios, yet without a wetting layer, which plays here a vital role. However, this non-trivial effect due to shape-elongation is strongly diminished by alloy randomness resulting from intermixing of InAs quantum-dot material with the surrounding InP matrix. Alloying randomizes, and to some degree flattens the shape dependence of fine-structure splitting giving a practical justification for the application of simplified theories. Finally, we find that the dark-exciton spectra are rather weakly affected by alloying and are dominated by the effects of lateral elongation.

Subject terms: Atomistic models, Quantum dots

Introduction

Quantum dots1,2 are man-made semiconductor nanostructures that come in a wide variety of types35, and are extensively studied with interest driven by both basic scientific curiosity as well as promising applications in quantum information6, computing7,8, and cryptography9. Apart from the elementary excitations, electrons and holes, quantum dots can confine interacting electron-hole pairs, namely excitons.10 An emission cascade from a two exciton (biexciton) state, through two indistinguishable exciton states should lead to the emission of polarization entangled photon pairs.9,1113 However, in realistic quantum dots the intermediate exciton state is often split by the electron-hole exchange interaction1416 hindering the efficiency of the entanglement generation. This energetic difference between the two bright exciton states, known as the fine-structure splitting or the bright exciton splitting (BES) is typically (10–100μeV) much larger than the emission linewidth (1μeV). Tailoring the BES in nanostructures is thus essential due to its relevance for photon entanglement generation.7,11,17,18 This is particularly important for InAs/InP nanostructures, which are promising candidates for quantum emitters at 1.3 or 1.55μm telecommunication relevant wavelengths1922. Notably, InAs/InP nanostructures can be fabricated in various ways, including self-assembled and nanowire quantum dots2327 of quasi-cylindrical shapes, as well as strongly elongated dots2842, sometimes referred to as quantum dashes. Similarly to cylindrically-shaped dot systems, quantum dashes have the potential for applications30,31,4345 combined with considerable tuning capabilities46,47. The manipulation of the BES aimed towards generation of entangled photon pairs is a vital and broad research area with significant efforts have been made utilizing post-growth annealing48,49, spectral filtering9, sample selection50,51, growth of highly symmetric structures24,26,5254, and the application of external electric55,56, magnetic18,57,58, and strain fields5961. With respect to the above quantum dashes are rather unobvious candidates for entanglement generation, since the BES is these systems is expected to be rather substantial47,62,63 due to their pronounced shape elongation16,64. However, in this work we show that shape elongation may not only reduce the bright exciton splitting63, but even lead to its vanishing, and subsequently to the reversal of bright excitonic spectral lines. This is possible for large but realistic elongation ratios, and thus practical quantum dash dimensions, yet for the growth process that does not incorporate the wetting layer. Apart from approaches based on droplet epitaxy65,66, obtaining such nanostructures seems at first very unlikely in the Stransky-Krastanov growth mode. However, recently an effective decoupling of the wetting layer from the quantum dot has been achieved by the addition of a monolayer of AlAs following the InAs quantum dot formation67. Ref.67 thus opens possibilities of obtaining Stransky-Krastanov assembled nanostructures with highly limited role of the wetting layer. Following these recent experimental efforts, we exploit such concept theoretically in this paper, by considering elongated quantum dot systems, yet grown without the wetting layer, conceivably with prospects of experimental realization of such quantum dots-quantum dash structures in near future.

No self-assembled quantum dash (or quantum dot) can be grown without the mixing of nanostructure material with the material of the surrounding matrix. This composition mixing, or alloying, leads to related alloy randomness, which usually affects the bright exciton spectra in a profound way68,69. In this work, we show that for a relatively small (P=10% or 20%) amount of phosphorous migrating into the InAs quantum dash from the surrounding InP matrix is it still possible to observe the reduction of the BES for elongation aspect ratio values between 6 and 8. However, for a larger degree of alloying, P=50%, random fluctuations seem to dominate and cancel the discussed effect.

Finally, we study dark-exciton spectra15,7072, properties of which in quantum dashes, such as the non-zero optical activity63,73 and splitting, appear to be dominated by shape deformation and rather immune to alloying effects.

Results

In order to compare the results with and without the wetting layer, we performed calculations following our approach from Ref.62, where typical nanostructures located on a wetting layer were studied. In this procedure, shape anisotropy is applied by elongating the system along the [11¯0] axis and simultaneously narrowing it in the perpendicular [110] direction, with the quantum dash volume (base field) kept constant (Fig. 1). in such a manner a cylindrical disk-shape quantum dot undergoes a transition to an elongated quantum dash with an elliptic base. The anisotropy16,62,64 parameter t defines the elongation of the nanonstructure, and defines its length X=r1+t and width Y=r/1+t, as depicted in Fig. 1. The details regarding quantum-dash dimensions, and other computational matters are discussed later in the text.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematics: top-view of an InAs nanostructure with shape deformation along the [11¯0] crystal axis as a function t for t=0, 1 and 2. The surrounding InP barrier is invisible for clarity.

Single particle states

Let us start by inspecting single-particle electron and hole levels as a function of both elongation and alloying, i.e. phosphorous content, as shown in Fig. 2. Electron levels demonstrate a transition from quasi-two-dimensional2 to quasi-one-dimensional one as a function of elongation, which is similar to the results obtained for a system with a wetting later63, depicting the change from a quantum-dot to a quantum-dash system. With the increasing deformation the energy of electron levels increases despite keeping the quantum dash base field fix. This is due to stronger confinement in the [110], which is not compensated by the increase of nanostructure length (along [11¯0]). This may be understood in a simple box or anisotropic harmonic confinement model, where confinement in each of the axes contributes as l-2 (l is the confinement length) to the ground-state energy. Thus, fixed XY does not imply a constant value of X-2+Y-2, which is an increasing function of t. Notably, with an increasing alloying, i.e. amount of phosphorous (high energy-gap material) the confining potential becomes effectively shallower. Thus, electron states are shifting up in energy with increasing P content. Apart from that, the general structure of electron states appears to be weakly affected by alloying, with small fluctuations due to alloy randomness. Decrease of confinement leads, however, to a decreased number of confined states, which changes from 10 for the unalloyed case to 5 for P=0.5, with the onset of quasi-continuum states at about 1450 meV in all considered cases.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Single particle electron (ad) and hole (eh) levels as a function of elongation t and phosphorous content P. Please note variable energy scales, as well as reversed ordering of hole levels. Lines connect and order the states energetically.

In contrary, hole levels (Fig. 2e–h) are strongly affected by alloying what appears to be a general feature of InAs/InP nanostructures62,69,74 likely due to smaller inter-level spacing of hole states, as compared to electrons. As a result, energies of excited hole states for alloyed systems (in particular for P=0.2 and P=0.5) are dominated by alloy randomness, with a weak dependence on anisotropy.

Exciton-energy spectra

Figure 3a shows the ground-state energy of the exciton confined in an elongated quantum dash as a function of anisotropy t and alloying P. Energy of exciton levels increases with both deformation and P content, consistently with the behavior of single particle states (in particular electron) forming the exciton. As a result, only small fluctuations due to alloy randomness are present in the exciton ground-state evolution for large values of P. However, this picture gets more complicated when the details of excitonic spectra are studied, starting with the energy difference (Fig. 3b) between manifolds of bright and dark excitonic species (related to isotropic electron-hole exchange interaction15, schematically illustrated in Fig. 4). The bright-dark exciton splitting (Fig. 3b) is approximately reduced by half by alloying for P=0.5, consistent with an intuitive understanding in which an InAs0.5P0.5 nanostructure has the depth of confining potential twice lower than a pure InAs system. Moreover, this splitting is affected by alloying with notable fluctuations on top of the dominant deformation-related trend. Furthermore, in all considered cases the dark-bright splitting is significantly reduced by elongation. In particular, the magnitude of this splitting for maximally elongated system is approximately half of that for the symmetric case.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Exciton ground-state energy and (b) bright-dark exciton state splitting as a function of quantum dash elongation t and phosphorous content P.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Schematics of excitonic energy levels ordering illustrating the bright exciton splitting (BES), dark exciton splitting (DES), bright-dark exciton splitting, and ΔST used for simple modeling as described in the text. The bright-dark splitting is affected by splittings within bright and dark exciton manifolds, whereas ΔST is not.

BES: no alloying

According to the definition, the bright-dark splitting is to a certain degree affected by splittings within bright and dark excitonic doublets (Fig. 4). Moreover, the BES is the experimentally relevant quantity, thus let us now focus on it, as shown in Fig. 5. For sake of comparison, the BES is studied here for the cases with and without the wetting layer, whereas the effects of alloying will be studied further.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of the bright exciton splitting as a function of shape elongation for the case with (black circles) and without the wetting layer (blue equares).

For a symmetric (t=0) and unalloyed nanostructure without the wetting layer, there is no fine structure splitting due to high D2d symmetry52. With elongation the symmetry is reduced to C2v leading to a non-zero BES, that is increasing with elongation and reaches the maximum of 67μeV for t=0.7. Then it is quenched and decreases with further elongation down to a small value of 0.05μeV for t=1.9. For even higher shape deformations, the polarization of excitonic lines (studied further in the text) is actually reversed, which indicates that BES is not simply reduced, but crossed zero, while the ordering of bright excitonic lines is reversed.

For the cases with the wetting layer, the symmetry is C2v even for t=0, which results in non-zero BES of 10μeV. This 10μeV difference between both cases holds up to t0.25, whereas for higher deformations the BES is significantly larger in nanostructures grown on the wetting layer. In both considered cases the BES has a maximum at t0.7, and then it is quenched. For a nanostructure with a wetting later one could extrapolate the results of our calculation and expect vanishing fine structure splitting for an extraordinarily large anisotropy of t3 (aspect ratio of 16 to 1) corresponding to a technologically challenging growth of nanostructures with lateral widths of only 5 nm and less. This in different than in the cases without the wetting layer, where fine structure splitting vanishes already for t=1.9, and thus for aspect ratio of 8 and lateral thickness of over 7 nm, thus corresponding to more realistically attainable dimensions.

While our results are obtained in a multi-band atomistic calculation accounting for configuration mixing effects, the key effect of vanishing fine structure splitting is also present in an approximation, where only the lowest electron and hole states, i.e. s shells, are accounted for (see the “Appendix”). Thus our results could in principle be analyzed in terms of a simple theoretical model. As proposed in Ref.75, the bright exciton states could be given as:

±1=1-β2±32,12+β12,12, 1

where ±32,12 are the heavy-hole exciton states with a β add-mixture of 12,12 light-hole excitons. In a simple two-by-two effective Hamiltonian model75, expressed in a basis of Eq. 1, the magnitude of BES is given as

BES=Δhh1-β2+Δlhβ2+43β1-β2ΔST, 2

where ΔST is the non-anisotropic electron-hole exchange energy related to the dark-bright exciton splitting, as shown schematically in Fig. 4, and mediating the relation between isotropic and non-isotropic fine structure splitting, whereas Δhh and Δlh are contributions related to heavy- and light-hole states, correspondingly, and not having a direct relation to ΔST. The mixing parameter β can obtained from optical spectra of bright excitonic states (discussed further in the text), namely the polarization anisotropy7577

C=Imax-IminImax+Imin=2β31-β23-2β2 3

For an unalloyed ideally cylindrical (t=0) case without the wetting layer (disk-shaped, pure InAs quantum dot) the resulting symmetry is D2d, and the fine structure splitting vanishes52,53, as both β=0 and Δhh=Δlh=0. For elongated systems (β0) the symmetry is reduced to C2v, yet one could use an approximation in which still Δhh=Δlh=0, and thus BES43β1-β2ΔST. This approach partially explains the reduction of the bright exciton splitting with elongation in terms of a competition between increasing β1-β2 contribution due to light-hole content and ΔST following the bright-dark splitting (Fig. 3a), and thus decreasing63 with elongation. However, such approximation does not reproduce the case with a vanishing (or reversed) fine structure, and moreover such model systematically and significantly overestimates the magnitude of the BES as compared to atomistic calculations63. To overcome both issues, we propose to use a formula with Δlh0,

BES=Δlhβ2+α43β1-β2ΔST, 4

in which the last term has been scaled down (corrected) by parameter α in order to overcome systematic error of an simple model, which is mostly related to fact the atomistic calculation are performed in a larger excitonic basis, thus accounting for effect of configuration mixing, which are absent in a 2-by-2 Hamiltonian treatment of Ref.75. Results of this phenomenological approach are shown in Fig. 5 with dashed red lines presenting a very good fit to the atomistic results. Here, we used effective parameters Δlh=-340μeV and α=0.37. (We note here that we could also obtain a fit of similar quality by using even simpler model, i.e., without introducing using α parameter, but by treating ΔST as constant (not depending on elongation) equal to 185 meV, and by setting Δlh=-573μeV.) Furthermore, the same approach works well also for the case with the wetting layer (again plotted with dashed red line in Fig. 5), with Δlh=-270μeV, and α=0.435. Additionally, due to the C2v symmetry of a nanostructure located on a wetting layer, even for t=0 one must add a heavy-hole term (i.e. Δhh1-β2) responsible for the non-zero fine structure spitting even in a fully cylindrical case. In our case Δhh=7.1μeV, which is significantly smaller than Δlh, and actually plays a role only for very weakly elongated cases.

Thus, the BES in highly elongated systems, in particular for the case without the wetting layer, appears to be governed by a competition of two light-hole terms: the quasi-linear term β1-β2ΔST dominant for moderate elongations, and the quadratic term Δlhβ2 that prevails for higher anisotropy, effectively allowing for the swapping of excitonic lines, and the vanishing BES occurring in the process. For nanostructures grown on the wetting layer it is possible for single particle states to leak into it63,78, which effectively partially compensates the anisotropy due to elongation. This leakage is, however, not possible for systems without the wetting layer, presumably allowing for a pronounced reduction of the BES for considerably smaller and more realistic values of t.

Results presented here suggest that it is in principle possible to obtain very low bright exciton splitting for highly shape-anisotropic nanostructures, grown without or electronically decoupled from the wetting layer. Quantum dashes with strongly reduced bright exciton splitting should in principle be very good candidates for further tuning of this splitting to zero by application of external fields18,5561. This, combined with recent experiments on the control of degree of polarization46 via photonic mesas, should open paths towards efficient generation of entangled photon pairs using quantum dashes. The reduction of the bright exciton splitting was shown here for a relatively narrow quantum dash with t=1.9 corresponding to the width of 7 nm. Determining the degree of agreement between the theory and the experiment by accounting for alloying effects79,80 is a promising path of research, and hence effects of alloying are studied in the following section.

BES: alloying

Alloy randomness has a pronounced effect on the BES, as shown in Fig. 6. The BES is studied here as a function of elongation and P content. With low alloying P=0.1, the general trend on shape-deformation is still present, for P=0.2 both alloy randomness and the reduction of BES for larger t values seem to be comparable, whereas for P=0.5 alloy randomness appears to dominate and smears the reduction of the BES with elongation. This “smearing” due to alloying is actually even more pronounced in a simplified theoretical treatment, where one neglects configuration mixing with higher shells (see the “Appendix”), and where the BES evolution with anisotropy for the P=0.5 case is quasi-linearly increasing with deformation, rather than being reduced for large t values.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Bright exciton splitting as a function of anisotropy t for various P contents. See the text for details.

Therefore, in the alloyed case the BES spectra could be viewed as an interplay of three “terms”. Two of these (related to light-hole contribution) apparently compete against each other as has been discussed for the non-alloyed case, and the third “contribution” being the alloying. For P=0.5 alloying, and for t<1, alloy randomness is effectively reducing the anisotropy, and thus apparently dumping the BES increase with deformation, apart from adding notable random oscillations. Yet, for even higher elongations one of shape elongation related contributions tends to dominate, and it prevails over alloying as well, leading to high BES values for t>2, what is mostly mediated by presence of higher shells (see the “Appendix”). We note however here, that more extensive studies on role of alloying (especially for large t values) need the be performed, e.g. by considering more than a single sample corresponding to the same average composition68,69. Due to large number of atoms, and related computational complexity of the configuration interaction these are ongoing studies, and their results will be presented elsewhere.

Pronounced role of alloying is also present in the bright exciton optical spectra, as shown in Fig. 7. For unalloyed and fully cylindrical case (Fig. 7a), both optically active excitonic lines have the same height, thus there is no polarization anisotropy (defined earlier in Eq. 3 as C). With the increasing shape elongation the lower excitonic line (BE1) is polarized along [11¯0] direction, and gets higher oscillator strength, whereas the energetically higher excitonic line (BE2) has orthogonal polarization ([110]) with lower strength. This difference in oscillator strengths leads to polarization anisotropy that grows with shape anisotropy, and we had used that earlier to retrieve β parameter. At t=1.9 excitonic lines reverse their energetic order, and now BE2 line is polarized along [11¯0], whereas BE1 along [110]. Notably, despite the C2v symmetry, both bright excitonic lines can cross (rather than anti-cross), since for unalloyed quantum dots bright excitonic states belong to different irreducible representations81. Hence, based on group-theoretical reasoning and contrary to simplified arguments shape deformation can in fact lead to a vanishing fine structure splitting.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Bright exciton optical spectra as a function of anisotropy t for various P contents. See the text for details.

The pictures gets more complicated for alloyed systems with polarization axes getting randomized69,82. However, for larger t values the bright exciton polarizations still maintain their dominant components in the [11¯0]/[110] basis, therefore we present these components on Fig. 7b–d. Figure 7b shows (for P=0.1) that the dip in the BES for t=1.7 is in fact assisted by the reversal of polarization even in this alloyed case. Similar effect occurs as well for P=0.2 (Fig. 7c; e.g. t=1.1) confirming that in principle the reduction of the BES with anisotropy may occur even in realistic cases with random alignment of atoms, provided the alloying level is limited. Interestingly, for alloyed cases there is also a reversal of polarizations for bright excitonic lines happening between t=0 and t=0.1. This is due to the fact that in alloyed cases there is a non-zero (7 to 10μeV) BES already for t=0 due to alloying69, and in cylindrical alloyed cases the lower excitonic line is predominantly polarized along the [110] direction, thus reversely to elongated cases. Therefore, small elongation of t=0.1 reverses polarization of excitonic lines that is imposed by alloying in cylindrical nanostructures. This effects is somewhat similar to reversal of polarization in C2v systems located on the wetting layer studied in our earlier work62. However, it should be reiterated that with alloying and low C1 symmetry, polarization axes are matching crystal axes only approximately with unavoidable randomization82. For P=0.2 this randomization is more notable, yet one can still observe that minima in the BES (Fig. 6d) are assisted by corresponding changes of polarization properties (Fig. 7d). Finally, for P=0.2 the randomization is quite strong for t<1, and generally the picture is complicated for smaller elongations, yet interestingly for larger t excitonic lines get very similar polarization properties as those observed for highly elongated cases with P=0, 0.1 and 0.2. Thus, shape anisotropy appears to enforce polarization properties for highly elongated, even though alloyed systems.

Dark exciton

Dark excitons are nowadays considered as important platform for various quantum-dot applications7072,8388. In Fig. 8, we show dark exciton splitting (DES) and its optical activity, both (quasi-)monotonically increasing with deformation, thus very similar to systems grown on the wetting layer. For the dark exciton the effect of alloying is substantial only for P=0.5, and only for larger deformation, where it apparently reduces the DES. In alloyed cases there are also some fluctuation due to alloy randomness, yet contrary to the BES, the overall trends of the DES and increase of the optical activity of dark exciton with elongation are to a large degree immune to alloy randomness.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Dark exciton energy splitting (a) and optical activity (b) as a function of anisotropy t and alloying for vrious P contents. Optical activity is given as oscillator strength reslative to (percentages) the bright-exciton oscillator strength for non-elongated cases. See the text for more details.

In a simple model63,75 treatment the DES should increase proportionally to the light-hole content (β), and thus monotonically increase with t. Therefore, for non-alloyed system, there is no competing term that could reduce the DES, as it happened for the BES, and thus the role of alloying appears to be less pronounced on the DES. The DES is also largely affected by the presence of higher-shells (see the “Appendix”) which is not accounted in the simple modeling. We found that configuration mixing with p- and d-shells is responsible for additional the increase of the DES for t>1 (addition of the f-shell apparently does not play a significant role; see the “Appendix”). In effect, the DES evolution is non-linear with t, growing rather weakly for small elongations, and more rapidly for t>1 (Fig. 8a). This effect is somewhat flatted by alloying, yet it is present even in the highly-alloyed case.

The different behavior of bright and dark complexes with respect to anisotropy is consistent with the lack of coupling between these excitonic species, as here we consider structures with high shape symmetry72, and thus the dark and bright excitonic manifolds are independent from each other. Notably the optical activity of the dark exciton reaches substantial 1 to 2% fraction of the bright exciton optical activity, for highest considered elongations, even in alloyed cases. Consistently with group-theoretical considerations54,73, for non-alloyed C2v systems one of dark excitonic lines (DE1, energetically lower) is strictly “dark” (optically inactive), whereas the energetically higher dark excitonic line (DE2) has non-zero optical activity, yet it is strictly z-polarized (with the exception of t=0 and D2d symmetry, where both dark excitons are strictly optically inactive).

For alloyed systems the optical activity of the dark exciton is still strongly dominated by the emission from energetically higher dark state (DE2) and is predominately z-polarized with only negligible emission with other polarizations, and virtually negligible emission from energetically lower (DE1) dark exciton state.

Discussion

We considered here quantum dash systems studied as a function of lateral aspect ratio and chemical composition. Nanostructures studied in this paper are assumed to be grown without the wetting layer, and to be disk-shaped in the growth direction. Lack of the wetting layer and a flat geometry leads to high overall symmetry, and thus contributions discussed here that lower the symmetry are related to (1) lateral deformation along one of the crystal axes, and (2) alloy randomness for chemical compositions different from pure InAs.

Our results indicate that shape anisotropy and disorder due to alloy randomness appear to compete regarding their impact on the fine structure splitting, whereas interestingly the shape-anisotropy may in fact lead to its vanishing. This surprising result can be understood in terms of a phenomenological model with two counteracting light-hole contributions of opposite signs. The magnitude of one of these contributions grows quadratically with shape elongation, and thus it dominates for larger aspect ratios. At a certain elongation these terms mutually cancel, which leads to a vanishing fine structure splitting. The reduction of the BES is assisted by the reversal of bright excitonic lines polarizations, yet large polarization anisotropy remains present even when BES is reduced. Generally, the polarization anisotropy grows with deformation similarly as in the case of more conventional quantum dashes located on a wetting layer.

Alloying counteracts strong spatial anisotropy and thus it appears to blur well defined BES trends. However, for small level of P contents, the bright exciton energy and optical spectra evolution with t qualitatively resembles that for pure InAs quantum dash. Thus, reduction of BES in elongated systems is still possible with alloyed system, provided that the level of material intermixing is sufficiently small. Alloyed quantum dashes maintain strong polarization anisotropy, with polarization axes randomized, yet still predominately related to the elongation/crystal axes. Finally, the dark exciton spectra appear to be largely immune to alloying, and being dominated by shape anisotropy.

To summarize, our theoretical results suggest that elongated nanostructures, yet without (or decoupled from) the wetting layer, with flat geometry and low alloying are good candidates for further research aiming for the BES reduction in InAs/InP semiconductor nanostructures.

Methods

The diameter of a quantum dash in a fully cylindrical (i.e. quantum dot) case is 20.6 nm, i.e., the radius is r=10.3nm. The height of all deformed nanostructures is kept fixed at 3 nm. We consider t to vary from 0 to 2.2 (see Fig. 1), so the aspect ratio is X/Y=(1+t)2 and reaches over 10 for the highest deformation considered. In order to account for the effect of alloying, apart from pure InAs system, we repeated the same calculation, yet for there different phosphorous contents: 10, 20 and 50%, i.e., corresponding to InAs0.9P0.1, InAs0.8P0.2, and InAs0.5P0.5. The choice of alloying levels (and choice of one random sample per each t and P value) was limited by the significant computational complexity of each calculation. Since t was varied from 0 to 2.2 with a step size of 0.1, the calculations were performed for a total of 92 different systems. For a non-alloyed case, the results without the wetting layer were compared with those accounting for the wetting layer as published in Ref.63. Only two additional data points (t=2.1 and t=2.2) were calculated for this case.

Our calculation starts with finding atomic positions that minimize the total elastic energy of the lattice, by using the valence force field method of Keating8993. Next, from atomic positions the piezoelectric potential is calculated9498, with piezoelectricity model and coefficients taken from Ref.96. Then, the single particle spectra of electrons and holes are obtained with the empirical tight-binding method accounting for up to d-orbitals and spin-orbit interaction78,78,91,99,99,100,100103.

Finally, the excitonic spectra are calculated with the configuration interaction method2,104108. Configuration interaction calculations are performed in a computationally challenging basis63 involving 20 (with spin) lowest-energy electron and hole states (up to the f shell of a single cylindrical quantum dot) and leading to the total 400 excitonic configuration, wheres the largest computational cost is related to calculation of 160,000 electron-hole Coulomb integrals105,106 over a computational box containing over 1.3×106 atoms. Results obtained in a smaller basis of lowest 4 excitonic configurations are shown in the “Appendix” for comparison.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Polish National Science Centre based on Decision No. 2018/31/B/ST3/01415. The author would like to thank Michał Gawłeczyk for reviewing the manuscript and valuable comments.

Appendix 1: BES: s-shell only

The BES in elongated systems is strongly affected by contributions from higher-energy shells via configuration mixing63. In order to study this effect for systems without the wetting layer, we show in Fig. 9 the results of the BES calculation similar to those studied earlier in Fig. 6, yet for a situation where configuration mixing with higher shells in not accounted for. Namely, Fig. 9 was obtained in a 4×4 excitonic basis15 by including the (electron and hole) s shells only. Figure 9 shows that generally results in a limited configuration-interaction basis, especially for the unalloyed case, are qualitatively similar to those obtained by a more complete treatment. The reduction of the BES with t is thus not related to configuration mixing, but occurs already in a simplified treatment including the ground states only. However, mixing of configurations (in other words correction due to correlations) generally increases the BES by (approximately) factor two, with more quantitative differences occurring for alloyed nanostructures. In particular, for a strongly alloyed case of P=0.5, the BES trend is strongly “flattened” or “smeared out” by alloying, and to a large degree is quasi-linear with respect to shape anisotropy t, yet with some fluctuations. This trend is qualitatively very different from the unalloyed case, which has a strong dip and reversal of the BES for t=1.6. Such dependence of the BES that grows quasi-monotonically with anisotropy, with only some minor fluctuations due to disorder is consistent with an effective-mass treatment of the problem64. However, such intuitive approach is based on virtual crystal approximation for alloying, as well as lack of mixing with higher shells. Accounting for both effect leads to a much complicated results as discussed in the current work.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Bright exciton splitting as a function of anisotropy t for various P contents, for a calculation that neglects configuration mixing with higher states (p, d, and f-shells). See the text for details.

Moreover, without alloying the reversal of bright excitonic lines occurs already for t=1.6, as compared to t=1.9 when accounting for higher shells. Thus, limiting number of higher-energy states should in principle reduce the BES via reduction of correlations, and directly due to lack of higher-energy states involved in the mixing. This could be experimentally achieved, e.g., with smaller quantum dot/dash heights. From a theoretical point of view this is an interesting direction of research that could be continued by considering nanostructures of different heights or shapes. Such approach combined with decoupling of the wetting layer from quantum dash spectra could be beneficial for tailoring of low BES system, similar to tailoring number of charged excitons in systems without the wetting layer.67

Appendix 2: BES and DES: higher shells

To further study the role of the configuration interaction Fig. 10 shows results of the BES and DES calculations for InAs0.5P0.5 nanostructure assuming a different number of single particle states (s, p, d, and f-shells) used in the calculation, and leading to an increasing number of excitonic configurations from 4, 36, 144 to 400 respectively. Figure 10 shows that contributions from p-, and d-shells should to be accounted for aiming for more accurate results, whereas the f-shell apparently plays a lesser role, making it probably that going for even higher levels (”g-shell”) is likely unnecessary, and therefore suggesting that configuration interaction procedure is close to convergence, at least with respect to considered spectral quantities.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Bright (a) and dark (b) exciton splitting calculated for InAs0.5P0.5 nanostructure by assuming different number of states (s, p, d, and f-shells) included in configuration interaction calculation. See the text for details.

Finally, we note that for the DES, the configuration mixing (i.e. going being the s-shell) is particularly important t>1, whereas for the BES it apparently needs to included for in the entire range of elongations. We also note that accounting for s- and p-shells only gives a very good trade-off between accuracy and computational complexity, i.e. a relatively good “quantitative” description of the BES/DES evolution, that comes with less than 1% cost of Coulomb and exchange integrals calculations (since the number of integrals that needs to be calculated scales as fourth-power105107 of single particle states included in the calculation).

Author contributions

M.Z. conducted all the calculations, the results analysis and prepared the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Jacak L, Hawrylak P, Wojs A. Quantum Dots. Berlin: Springer; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Michler P, editor. Topics in Applied Physics. New York: Springer; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bimberg D, Grundmann M, Ledentsov N. Quantum Dot Heterostructures. Chichester: Wiley; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ivchenko E. Optical Spectroscopy of Semiconductor Nanostructures. 2. Oxford: Alpha Science; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bryant GW, Solomon G. Optics of Quantum Dots and Wires. Boston: Artech House; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zrenner A, et al. Coherent properties of a two-level system based on a quantum-dot photodiode. Nature. 2002;418:612–614. doi: 10.1038/nature00912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Michler P, et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science. 2000;290:2282–2285. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Loss D, DiVincenzo DP. Quantum computation with quantum dots. Phys. Rev. A. 1998;57:120. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Akopian N, et al. Entangled photon pairs from semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;96:130501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.130501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sheng W-D, et al. Electronic and optical properties of semiconductor and graphene quantum dots. Front. Phys. 2012;7:328–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Benson O, Santori C, Pelton M, Yamamoto Y. Regulated and entangled photons from a single quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000;84:2513–2516. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prilmüller M, et al. Hyperentanglement of photons emitted by a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;121:110503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.110503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bouwes Bavinck M, et al. Photon cascade from a single crystal phase nanowire quantum dot. Nano Lett. 2016;16:1081–1085. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gammon D, Snow ES, Shanabrook BV, Katzer DS, Park D. Fine structure splitting in the optical spectra of single GaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;76:3005–3008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bayer M, et al. Fine structure of neutral and charged excitons in self-assembled in(Ga)As/(Al)GaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2002;65:195315. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.195315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Takagahara T. Theory of exciton doublet structures and polarization relaxation in single quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2000;62:16840–16855. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.16840. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Santori C, Pelton M, Solomon G, Dale Y, Yamamoto Y. Triggered single photons from a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001;86:1502–1505. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stevenson RM, et al. A semiconductor source of triggered entangled photon pairs. Nature. 2006;439:179EP. doi: 10.1038/nature04446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Anufriev R, et al. Optical polarization properties of InAs/InP quantum dot and quantum rod nanowires. Nanotechnology. 2015;26:395701. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/39/395701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yuan J, et al. Controlling polarization anisotropy of site-controlled InAs/InP (100) quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011;98:201904. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Benyoucef M, Yacob M, Reithmaier J, Kettler J, Michler P. Telecom-wavelength (1.5 μ m) single-photon emission from inp-based quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013;103:162101. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kors A, Fuchs K, Yacob M, Reithmaier J, Benyoucef M. Telecom wavelength emitting single quantum dots coupled to InP-based photonic crystal microcavities. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017;110:031101. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Williams R, et al. Controlling the self-assembly of InAs/InP quantum dots. J. Cryst. Growth. 2001;223:321–331. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kors A, Reithmaier JP, Benyoucef M. Telecom wavelength single quantum dots with very small excitonic fine-structure splitting. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018;112:172102. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dalacu D, et al. Selective-area vapour–liquid–solid growth of InP nanowires. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:395602. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/39/395602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Versteegh MAM, et al. Observation of strongly entangled photon pairs from a nanowire quantum dot. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:1–6. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bouwes Bavinck M, et al. Controlling a nanowire quantum dot band gap using a straining dielectric envelope. Nano Lett. 2012;12:6206–6211. doi: 10.1021/nl303081m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dery H, et al. On the nature of quantum dash structures. J. Appl. Phys. 2004;95:6103–6111. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sauerwald A, et al. Size control of InAs quantum dashes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005;86:253112. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reithmaier JP, et al. InP based lasers and optical amplifiers with wire-/dot-like active regions. J. Phys. D. 2005;38:2088. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Reithmaier JP, Eisenstein G, Forchel A. InAs/InP quantum-dash lasers and amplifiers. Proc. IEEE. 2007;95:1779–1790. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2007.900950. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Khan MZM, Ng TK, Ooi BS. Self-assembled InAs/InP quantum dots and quantum dashes: material structures and devices. Prog. Quantum Electron. 2014;38:237–313. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Musiał A, et al. Carrier trapping and luminescence polarization in quantum dashes. Phys. Rev. B. 2012;85:035314. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Musiał A, et al. Toward weak confinement regime in epitaxial nanostructures: interdependence of spatial character of quantum confinement and wave function extension in large and elongated quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;90:045430. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gawełczyk M, et al. Exciton lifetime and emission polarization dispersion in strongly in-plane asymmetric nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:245425. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.96.245425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gawełczyk M, et al. Excited states of neutral and charged excitons in single strongly asymmetric inp-based nanostructures emitting in the telecom c band. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100:241304. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.241304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gawełczyk M. Excitons in asymmetric nanostructures: confinement regime. Acta Phys. Pol. A. 2018;134:930. doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.134.930. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dusanowski Ł, et al. Confinement regime in self-assembled InAs/InAlGaAs/InP quantum dashes determined from exciton and biexciton recombination kinetics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017;111:253106. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dusanowski Ł, et al. Strongly temperature-dependent recombination kinetics of a negatively charged exciton in asymmetric quantum dots at 1.55μm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018;113:043103. doi: 10.1063/1.5030895. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Musiał A, et al. Phonon-assisted radiative recombination of excitons confined in strongly anisotropic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;90:125424. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Syperek M, et al. Exciton spin relaxation in InAs/InGaAlAs/InP(001) quantum dashes emitting near 1.55 μm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016;109:193108. doi: 10.1063/1.4966997. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jung D, Ironside DJ, Bank SR, Gossard AC, Bowers JE. Effect of growth interruption in 1.55 μ m InAs/InAlGaAs quantum dots on InP grown by molecular beam epitaxy. J. Appl. Phys. 2018;123:205302. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dusanowski Ł, et al. Exciton and biexciton dynamics in single self-assembled InAs/InGaAlAs/InP quantum dash emitting near 1.55 μ m. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013;103:253113. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dusanowski Ł, et al. Single photon emission at 1.55 μ m from charged and neutral exciton confined in a single quantum dash. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014;105:021909. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Azouigui S, et al. Optical feedback tolerance of quantum-dot-and quantum-dash-based semiconductor lasers operating at 1.55mum. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2009;15:764–773. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mrowiński P, et al. Photonic engineering of highly linearly polarized quantum dot emission at telecommunication wavelengths operating. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;97:165427. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mrowiński P, et al. Magnetic field control of the neutral and charged exciton fine structure in single quantum dashes emitting at 1.55 μ m. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015;106:053114. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Langbein W, et al. Control of fine-structure splitting and biexciton binding in In x Ga 1–x As quantum dots by annealing. Phys. Rev. B. 2004;69:161301. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Young R, et al. Inversion of exciton level splitting in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2005;72:113305. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hafenbrak R, et al. Triggered polarization-entangled photon pairs from a single quantum dot up to 30 k. New J. Phys. 2007;9:315. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Olbrich F, et al. Polarization-entangled photons from an InGaAs-based quantum dot emitting in the telecom c-band. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017;111:133106. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Singh R, Bester G. Nanowire quantum dots as an ideal source of entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;103:063601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.063601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Karlsson KF, et al. Fine structure of exciton complexes in high-symmetry quantum dots: effects of symmetry breaking and symmetry elevation. Phys. Rev. B. 2010;81:161307. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.161307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dupertuis MA, et al. Symmetries and the polarized optical spectra of exciton complexes in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107:127403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.127403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kowalik K, et al. Influence of an in-plane electric field on exciton fine structure in InAs-GaAs self-assembled quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005;86:041907. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bennett A, et al. Electric-field-induced coherent coupling of the exciton states in a single quantum dot. Nat. Phys. 2010;6:947. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Stevenson R, et al. Magnetic-field-induced reduction of the exciton polarization splitting in InAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2006;73:033306. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gerardot B, et al. Manipulating exciton fine structure in quantum dots with a lateral electric field. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007;90:041101. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Seidl S, et al. Effect of uniaxial stress on excitons in a self-assembled quantum dot. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006;88:203113. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ding F, et al. Tuning the exciton binding energies in single self-assembled InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots by piezoelectric-induced biaxial stress. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:067405. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.067405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Trotta R, et al. Universal recovery of the energy-level degeneracy of bright excitons in InGaAs quantum dots without a structure symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;109:147401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.147401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zieliński M. Excitonic fine structure of elongated InAs/InP quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;88:155319. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.155319. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zieliński M. From quantum dots to quantum dashes: excitonic spectra of highly elongated InAs/InP nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:205402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.205402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kadantsev E, Hawrylak P. Theory of exciton fine structure in semiconductor quantum dots: quantum dot anisotropy and lateral electric field. Phys. Rev. B. 2010;81:045311. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.045311. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ueda T, Gao QZ, Yamaichi E, Yamagishi C, Akiyama M. Growth of GaAs microcrystal by Ga droplet formation and successive as supply with low-pressure metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. J. Cryst. Growth. 1994;145:707–713. doi: 10.1016/0022-0248(94)91131-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Watanabe K, Koguchi N, Gotoh Y. Fabrication of GaAs quantum dots by modified droplet epitaxy. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2000;39:L79. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Löbl MC, et al. Excitons in InGaAs quantum dots without electron wetting layer states. Commun. Phys. 2019;2:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zieliński M, et al. Excitonic complexes in natural InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91:085303. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.085303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zieliński M. Spectra of dark and bright excitons in alloyed nanowire quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100:045309. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.045309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Schwartz I, et al. Deterministic coherent writing of a long-lived semiconductor spin qubit using one ultrafast optical pulse. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92:201201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.201201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Schwartz I, et al. Deterministic writing and control of the dark exciton spin using single short optical pulses. Phys. Rev. X. 2015;5:011009. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zieliński M, Don Y, Gershoni D. Atomistic theory of dark excitons in self-assembled quantum dots of reduced symmetry. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91:085403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.085403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Korkusinski M, Hawrylak P. Atomistic theory of emission from dark excitons in self-assembled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;87:115310. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.115310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zieliński M. Fine structure of light-hole excitons in nanowire quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;88:115424. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.115424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Tsitsishvili E. Impact of heavy hole-light hole coupling on the exciton fine structure in quantum dots. Phys. E. 2017;87:161–165. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tonin C, et al. Polarization properties of excitonic qubits in single self-assembled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2012;85:155303. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.155303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Léger Y, Besombes L, Maingault L, Mariette H. Valence-band mixing in neutral, charged, and mn-doped self-assembled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2007;76:045331. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.045331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zieliński M. Valence band offset, strain and shape effects on confined states in self-assembled InAs/InP and InAs/GaAs quantum dots. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2013;25:465301. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/25/46/465301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Klimeck G, Oyafuso F, Boykin T, Bowen R, von Allmen P. Development of a nanoelectronic 3-d (nemo 3-d) simulator for multimillion atom simulations and its application to alloyed quantum dots. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci.: CMES. 2002;3:601. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Świderski M, Zieliński M. Atomistic theory of excitonic fine structure in InAs/InP nanowire quantum dot molecules. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;95:125407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.125407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Singh R, Bester G. Lower bound for the excitonic fine structure splitting in self-assembled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:196803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.196803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mlinar V, Zunger A. Effect of atomic-scale randomness on the optical polarization of semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;79:115416. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.McFarlane J, et al. Gigahertz bandwidth electrical control over a dark exciton-based memory bit in a single quantum dot. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009;94:093113. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Xu X, et al. Coherent population trapping of an electron spin in a single negatively charged quantum dot. Nat. Phys. 2008;4:692. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ohta R, Okamoto H, Tawara T, Gotoh H, Yamaguchi H. Dynamic control of the coupling between dark and bright excitons with vibrational strain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:267401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.267401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Simon C, Poizat J-P. Creating single time-bin-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;94:030502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.030502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Weihs G, Huber T, Predojević A. Time-bin entanglement from quantum dots. In: Michler P, editor. Quantum Dots for Quantum Information Technologies. Berlin: Springer; 2017. pp. 267–284. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Michler P. Quantum Dots for Quantum Information Technologies. Berlin: Springer; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Keating PN. Effect of invariance requirements on the elastic strain energy of crystals with application to the diamond structure. Phys. Rev. 1966;145:637–645. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.145.637. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Martin RM. Elastic properties of ZNS structure semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B. 1970;1:4005–4011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.4005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Jaskólski W, Zieliński M, Bryant GW, Aizpurua J. Strain effects on the electronic structure of strongly coupled self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dots: tight-binding approach. Phys. Rev. B. 2006;74:195339. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.195339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Pryor C, Kim J, Wang LW, Williamson AJ, Zunger A. Comparison of two methods for describing the strain profiles in quantum dots. J. Appl. Phys. 1998;83:2548–2554. doi: 10.1063/1.366631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Saito T, Arakawa Y. Electronic structure of piezoelectric In0.2Ga0.8N quantum dots in GaN calculated using a tight-binding method. Phys. E. 2002;15:169–181. doi: 10.1016/S1386-9477(02)00515-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bester G, Wu X, Vanderbilt D, Zunger A. Importance of second-order piezoelectric effects in zinc-blende semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;96:187602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.187602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Bester G, Zunger A, Wu X, Vanderbilt D. Effects of linear and nonlinear piezoelectricity on the electronic properties of InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2006;74:081305. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.081305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Beya-Wakata A, Prodhomme P-Y, Bester G. First- and second-order piezoelectricity in iii–v semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;84:195207. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.195207. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Tse G, et al. Non-linear piezoelectricity in zinc blende GaAs and InAs semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 2013;114:073515. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Caro, M. A., Schulz, S. & O’Reilly, E. P. Origin of nonlinear piezoelectricity in iii–v semiconductors: internal strain and bond ionicity from hybrid-functional density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B91, 075203. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.075203 (2015).
  • 99.Zieliński M. Including strain in atomistic tight-binding Hamiltonians: an application to self-assembled InAs/GaAs and InAs/InP quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2012;86:115424. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zieliński M, Korkusinski M, Hawrylak P. Atomistic tight-binding theory of multiexciton complexes in a self-assembled InAs quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B. 2010;81:085301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.085301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Jancu J-M, Scholz R, Beltram F, Bassani F. Empirical spds* tight-binding calculation for cubic semiconductors: general method and material parameters. Phys. Rev. B. 1998;57:6493–6507. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.6493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lee S, Oyafuso F, von Allmen P, Klimeck G. Boundary conditions for the electronic structure of finite-extent embedded semiconductor nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B. 2004;69:045316. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.045316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zieliński M. Multi-scale simulations of semiconductor nanostructures. Acta Phys. Pol. A. 2012;122:312. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Lee S, Jönsson L, Wilkins JW, Bryant GW, Klimeck G. Electron-hole correlations in semiconductor quantum dots with tight-binding wave functions. Phys. Rev. B. 2001;63:195318. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.195318. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Schulz S, Schumacher S, Czycholl G. Tight-binding model for semiconductor quantum dots with a wurtzite crystal structure: from one-particle properties to coulomb correlations and optical spectra. Phys. Rev. B. 2006;73:245327. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.245327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Różański PT, Zieliński M. Linear scaling approach for atomistic calculation of excitonic properties of 10-million-atom nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;94:045440. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.045440. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Różański PT, Zieliński M. Efficient computation of coulomb and exchange integrals for multi-million atom nanostructures. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2019;238:254–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Cygorek M, Korkusinski M, Hawrylak P. Atomistic theory of electronic and optical properties of InAsP/InP nanowire quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;101:075307. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES