Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2020 Jul 17;39(15):2878–2887. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.0c00385

Synthesis of Stable Dianionic Cyclic Silenolates and Germenolates

Tanja Wiesner 1, Mario Leypold 1, Anja Steinmaurer 1, Dominik Schnalzer 1, Roland C Fischer 1, Ana Torvisco 1, Michael Haas 1,*
PMCID: PMC7422643  PMID: 32801424

Abstract

graphic file with name om0c00385_0014.jpg

In this contribution a convenient synthetic method to obtain the previously unknown dianionic cyclic silenolates and germenolates is described. These dianions 2a,b and 4a,b are easily accessible via a one-pot synthetic protocol in high yields. Their structural properties were analyzed by a combination of NMR, single-crystal X-ray crystallography, and DFT quantum mechanical calculations. Moreover, the reactivity of 2a,b and 4a,b with selected examples of electrophiles was investigated. 2a and 4a were reacted with ClSiiPr3 to give new examples of polysilanes and polygermanes with exocyclic double bonds. The reaction of 2b with ClSiMe2SiMe2Cl led to the formation of the acyl bicyclo[2.2.2]octasilane 6. Moreover, the reaction of 2a,b and 4a,b with MeI, as an example of a carbon-centered electrophile, led to selective alkylation reactions at the negatively charged silicon and germanium atoms. The corresponding methylated structures 9a,b and 10a,b were formed in nearly quantitative yields. The competitive reactivity of the silyl and silenolate anion toward 1 equiv of ClSiMe3 showed that the outcome of the reaction was strongly influenced by the substituent at the carbonyl moiety. 2a reacted with 1 equiv of ClSiMe3 to give the corresponding cyclic silenolate S1a, which demonstrated that the silyl anion is more nucleophilic than the silenolate with attached aromatic groups. 2b, on the other hand, reacted with 1 equiv of ClSiMe3 to give the bicyclic compound 11via an intramolecular sila-Peterson alkenation reaction. These findings clearly showed that the alkyl-substituted silenolate is more nucleophilic than the silyl anion. This paper demonstrates that 2a,b and 4a,b have the potential to be used as unique building blocks for complex polysilane and polygermane frameworks.

Introduction

The synthesis of defined polysilanes in which more than five silicon atoms are connected is challenging. The standard approaches for such polysilanes are Wurtz-type coupling13 or Lewis acid catalyzed rearrangement reactions.4 These two methods generally give rise to structurally simple polysilanes with a low set of functionalities for further derivatization, which prevent the construction of molecules of even moderate complexity.

A potent strategy for the construction of structurally more challenging silicon frameworks is the use of di- or multifunctionalized starting materials such as α,ω-dianions. Gilman5,6 and Hengge7,8 were pioneers in this area and developed the cleavage of strained cyclosilanes to obtain dianions. Sekiguchi,9 Tokitoh,10 Kira,11 and Apeloig12 also contributed with their groups to this research field and prepared some previously unknown 1,1-, 1,2-, and 1,4-dilithiooligosilanes. Marschner and Baumgartner, who introduced KOtBu into the field of polysilane chemistry, achieved a milestone in polysilane synthesis. Consequently, the construction of relative complex polysilanes could be accomplished in a straightforward way.1316 Recently, Klausen and co-workers established new phenyl-substituted dianions.17 These dianions were used as building blocks for the formation of defined polysilanes as well as for the synthesis of heteroelement substituted polysilanes.1820 Scheschkewitz et al. treated their hexasilabenzene with lithium naphthalenide and obtained a novel dianionic silicon cluster. This dianion turned out to be a valuable synthon for the generation of unprecedented molecular heterosiliconoids with boron and phosphorus directly incorporated into the cluster scaffold.21 In addition, we just published a paper about the synthesis of a mixed substituted dianion, which allows straightforward access to a hitherto unknown tricyclic polysilane (see Chart 1).22 Nevertheless, the synthesis of mixed functionalized disilanides has not been reported so far, although these substances would represent ideal building blocks for highly complex silicon frameworks.

Chart 1.

Chart 1

As we have reported earlier, it is possible to synthesize and characterize cyclic silenolates as well as cyclic germenolates and convert them with suitable electrophiles in order to gain a new set of differently substituted acylsilanes as well as acylgermanes (see Chart 2).

Chart 2.

Chart 2

Furthermore, we could show that the reaction of these enolates with chlorosilanes ClSiR3 allowed straightforward access to silenes and germenes with exocyclic structures.23,24 Due to the straightforward accessibility of these cyclic enolates, we saw the potential to investigate their chemical behavior in greater depth. In this context, we have established a novel synthetic strategy for the synthesis of previously unknown dianionic cyclic silenolates and germenolates. The aim of this work is to investigate the spectroscopic properties and the reactivity of these new types of dianions with selected examples of electrophiles.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of Dianionic Silenolates

The reaction of the acylcyclohexasilanes 1a,b with 2 equiv of KOtBu led to the formation of compounds 2a,b, whereby two different functionalized anionic silicon atoms were incorporated into one molecule (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Dianionic Compounds 2a,b.

Scheme 1

To the best of our knowledge, 2a,b represent the first examples of dianionic polysilanes bearing a silyl anion and a silenolate fragment in one molecule. The dianionic compounds 2a,b were formed in the same fashion as previously described for the corresponding silenolates. Two major differences are worth mentioning. First, the use of an appropriate solvent is highly important. We observed the formation of 2a,b only in DME, Et2O, and toluene. In the case of THF, no product was formed, probably due to the reaction of 2a,b with THF leading to degradation. This was also described in the case of α,ω-oligosilyl dianions by Marschner et al.,14 who observed that stable dianionic species were only formed with the use of DME or benzene/toluene with the addition of crown ethers. Second, the reaction is characterized by a two-step reaction sequence. The first 1 equiv of KOtBu is consumed immediately (approximately 10 min), yielding the silenolates S1a,b. The second abstraction of the trimethylsilyl group is much slower and takes place within approximately 18 h. For isolation, 2a,b were crystallized from Et2O/18-cr-6 at room temperature to give orange crystals of the 1:2 18-cr-6 adducts, which were obtained in isolated yields of >90%. After filtration, the crystals can be stored at −30 °C in the absence of air even for prolonged periods. 2a,b afforded crystals of sufficient quality for single-crystal X-ray crystallography. The molecular structures are depicted in Figures 1 and 2; selected bond lengths and the sums of valence angles are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

ORTEP diagram for compound 2a (1:2 adduct with 18-cr-6). Thermal ellipsoids are depicted at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ORTEP diagram for compound 2b (1:2 adduct with 18-cr-6). Thermal ellipsoids are depicted at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

Table 1. Selected Bond Lengths d (Å) and Sum of Valence Angles ∑αSi(1), ∑αSi(6), and ∑αC(1) (deg) for 2a,b.

  2a 2b
d(Si(1)–C(1)) 1.892 1.916
d(Si(1)–K(1)) 5.102 5.215
d(C(1)–K(1)) 3.843 3.672
d(C(1)–O(1)) 1.254 1.254
d(K(1)–O(1)) 2.614 2.579
d(Si(6)–K(2)) 3.441 3.458
d(Si(1)–K(2)) 4.143 7.361
∑αSi(1) 312.5 314.4
∑αSi(6) 307.8 306.1
∑αC(1) 359.7 360.0

On the basis of the observed structural features, 2a,b are best described as acyl silyl anions (keto form) with Si–C single bonds, C=O double bonds, and markedly pyramidal central Si(1) atoms. Interestingly in 2a the K(2)+ cation coordinates simultaneously to Si(1) and Si(6). This is probably caused by a packing phenomenon. Furthermore, this simultaneous coordination is also the reason for 2a to adopt the half-boat conformation, while 2b and 4b (4b is the dianionic germenolate and will be introduced in the next section) adopt chair conformations. Additionally 2a shows short Si(2)–CH contacts which are less than the van der Waals radii of silicon and hydrogen. This can also explain its half-boat coordination. A similar result in terms of Si–CH contacts was obtained by the Klausen group.17

Synthesis of Dianionic Germenolates

The straightforward synthesis of 2a,b encouraged us to expand our new methodology to other starting materials. As we have reported previously, it is possible to synthesize cyclic acylgermanes 3a,b.24 The reaction of these cyclic acylgermanes with 2 equiv of KOtBu led to the formation of dianionic germenolates 4a,b (Scheme 2). Again, the reaction is characterized by a two-step reaction sequence with reaction rates similar to those of the corresponding acylsilanes.

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Dianionic Germenolates 4a,b.

Scheme 2

For isolation, 4a,b were crystallized from Et2O/18-cr-6 at room temperature to give orange crystals of the 1:2 18-cr-6 adducts, which can be stored after filtration at −30 °C in the absence of air even for prolonged periods. 4b afforded crystals of sufficient quality for single-crystal X-ray crystallography. The molecular structure is depicted in Figure 3; selected bond lengths and the sums of valence angles are summarized in Table 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

ORTEP diagram for compound 4b (1:2 adduct with 18-cr-6). Thermal ellipsoids are depicted at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

Table 2. Selected Bond Lengths d (Å) and Sum of Valence Angles ∑α(Ge1), ∑α(Ge2), and ∑α(C1) (deg) for 4b.

d(Ge(1)–C(1)) 2.047
d(Ge(1)–K(1)) 3.427
d(C(1)–K(1)) 3.335
d(C(1)–O(1)) 1.248
d(K(1)–O(1)) 2.760
d(Ge(2)–K(2)) 3.635
d(Ge(1)–K(2)) 6.671
∑αGe(1) 314.5°
∑αGe(2) 298.2°
∑αC(1) 359.6°

On the basis of the observed structural features, 4b is best described as an acyl germyl anion (keto form) with a Ge–C single bond, a C=O double bond, and markedly pyramidal central Ge(1) and Ge(2) atoms.

NMR Spectroscopy of 2a,b and 4a,b

NMR data also supported that the dominant structure of 2a,b and 4a,b in solution is the keto form. Very similar 13C chemical shifts were observed for the carbonyl C atom of the two compounds between δ 266.6 and 280.9 ppm in a typical range for carbonyl groups. Furthermore, 2a,b and 4a,b exhibit only two sharp SiMe2 resonance lines in the 29Si NMR, which clearly suggest free rotation around the Si(1)–C(1) bond (Table 3). It was not possible to use THF-d8 for 2b and 4b because a detectable degradation was found within minutes at room temperature.

Table 3. Selected 13C and 29Si NMR Chemical Shifts for the Silenolates 2a,b and 4a,ba.

  2 (ppm)
4 (ppm)
  a, Mesb b, Adc a, Mesb b, Adc
δ13C(C=O) 266.63 273.96 281.01 280.92
δ29Si(SiMe3) 0.05 –1.14 0.93 0.36
δ29Si(SiMe2) –27.69 –26.48 –27.69 –23.45
  –32.37 –31.31 –29.35 –25.40
δ29Si(Siq) –67.70 –87.33    
  –189.08 –192.42    
a

δ values relative to external TMS.

b

In THF-d8 at 25 °C.

c

In C6D6 at 25 °C.

UV–Vis Spectroscopy and TDDFT-PCM Calculations

Toluene was used as a solvent to determine the charge transfer behavior for the longest wavelength absorption band.25Figure 4 depicts the measured UV–vis spectra of 2a,b and 4a,b in toluene together with their calculated frontier Kohn–Sham orbitals.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Measured UV–vis spectra of 2a,b and 4a,b in toluene (1 × 10–4 mol L–1), and the calculated frontier Kohn–Sham orbitals of 2a,b at the TDDFT-PCM(toluene) CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p)//B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory. Kohn–Sham orbitals of4a,b are similar in shape and energy (see the Supporting Information).

In order to examine the differences between aromatic and saturated substituents at the carbonyl moiety, the mesityl- and adamantyl-substituted derivatives 2a,b and 4a,b were investigated. All UV–vis calculations were performed on the geometry-optimized X-ray crystal structures via TDDFT-PCM in toluene at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.26 Noteworthy, CAM-B3LYP achieved a better consistency for dianions 2a,b and 4a,b in calculated vertical excitations in comparison to B3LYP, which was previously applied to UV–vis calculations on silenolates S1a,b and germenolates S2a,b.24,27 The silenolates 2a,b exhibit intense absorption maxima in the range between 433 and 450 nm, which are red-shifted in the order 2b2a. The same bathochromic trend 4b4a also applies to the germenolates 4a,b with absorption maxima between 420 and 447 nm. The acyl substituent (aryl vs alkyl) significantly affects the HOMO orbital density and hence its shape, which ultimately leads to different reaction centers in conversion with electrophiles (see section below). The HOMO-1 and HOMO of 2a (Figure 4) correspond to the pz orbital of the silenolate with a significant part of the corresponding silanide mixed in, respectively. This contribution makes the silanide equally nucleophilic regarding reactions of cyclic silenolates with aromatic acyl substituents. In contrast, the HOMO of 2b only exhibits the pz character of the silenolate, whereas the HOMO-1 of 2b shows the silanide orbital alone, allowing a site-specific functionalization. In addition, the energy difference between the HOMO-1 and the HOMO is in 2a significantly larger than in 2b (0.28 eV vs 0.09 eV). Similar observations were made with the dianionic germenolates 4a,b. Upon excitation, electron density is displaced into the π* orbital of the corresponding carbonyl orbitals. In the corresponding LUMOs of the aryl-substituted species 2a and 4a, our calculations additionally showed considerable conjugation of the carbonyl group and the aromatic π systems, which is not possible for the alkyl-substituted silenolate 2b and germanolate 4b. As a consequence of this, the empty orbitals are energetically stabilized in the order 2b2a. This stabilization results in smaller excitation energies and in the observed bathochromic shifts of the corresponding absorption bands. The obtained experimental and computational data are summarized in Table 4 and show reasonable agreement.

Table 4. Experimental and TDDFT-PCM(toluene) CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p)//B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) Calculated Absorption Bands λ in Toluene and Extinction Coefficients ε with Respect to Oscillator Strengths f for 2a,b and 4a,b.

  λmax,exp (nm) ε (L mol–1 cm–1) λmax,calca (nm) f assignment
2a 450 6602 441 0.2102 pz → π*(CO/aryl)
2b 433 3730 428 0.1131 pz → π*(CO)
4a 447 5753 435 0.1591 pz → π*(CO/aryl)
4b 420 2178 418 0.0858 pz → π*(CO)
a

λmax,calc values are corrected by a factor of 5% due to a consistent overestimation of excitation energies with CAM-B3LYP.

Reactivity of 2a,b versus Selected Examples of Chlorosilanes

The reactivity of 2a,b versus chlorosilanes parallels the observed reactivities for silenolates and silyl anions. The same reactivity was found by Ohshita and Ishikawa, by Marschner et al., and by our group.1315,23,28,29 Thus, 2b with an alkyl group attached to the carbonyl moiety reacted with an equimolar amount of tetramethyldichlorodisilane (ClSiMe2SiMe2Cl) at 0 °C in THF with formation of the acyl bicyclo[2.2.2]octasilane 6. 6 was obtained in nearly quantitative yield (95% yield). The asymmetrically substituted acylsilane 6 exhibits two 29Si resonance lines for the SiMe2 groups near −37 ppm, which are not significantly influenced by the nature of the adamantoyl group. The two δ29Si values for the bridgehead Si atoms were measured near −131 ppm (characteristic for tetrasilyl-substituted silanes) and −77 ppm (characteristic for acyl-substituted quaternary silanes). The same tendencies were found earlier by Stueger et al. during the synthesis of a series of substituted bicyclo[2.2.2]octasilanes.30 The aryl-substituted compound 2a exclusively afforded the O-silylated silene 5 under the same conditions (compare Scheme 3). NMR spectral data of 5 (see the Experimental Section) are also typical for a Brook-type silene. 13C and 29Si signals characteristic for Si=C were observed at δ29Si 32.8 ppm and δ13C 198.9 ppm, respectively. 5 was obtained in a good yield (64% yield).

Scheme 3. Reactivity of Dianionic Compounds 2a,b toward Chlorosilanes.

Scheme 3

Reactivity of 4a,b versus Selected Examples of Chlorosilanes

Furthermore, the reactivity of 4a,b versus chlorosilanes was investigated and parallels that previously observed for germenolates and germyl anions.24,31 The reaction of 4a with 2 equiv of ClSiiPr3 afforded the formation of the O-silylated germene 7 in excellent yields (compare Scheme 4). NMR spectral data of 7 (see the Experimental Section) are again typical for a Brook-type germene. A 13C signal characteristic for Ge=C was observed at δ13C 210.17 ppm. Interestingly, the reaction of 4b with an equimolar amount of ClSiMe2SiMe2Cl did not lead to the formation of the expected product 8; instead, an undefined polymeric material was formed.

Scheme 4. Reactivity of Dianionic Compounds 4a,b toward Chlorosilanes.

Scheme 4

The unsuccessful derivatization of 4b with ClSiMe2SiMe2Cl encouraged us to investigate the reactivity of 4b with 2 equiv of ClSiiPr3. Again, no expected product formation was observed (Scheme 5). The same experiment was further repeated with 2b and gave also rise to an undefined polymer. Therefore, we reasoned that ClSiiPr3 is too sterically demanding to allow M–Si (M = Si for 2b and M = Ge for 4b) bond formation in the presence of an adamantoyl group.

Scheme 5. Reactivity of Dianionic Compounds 2b and 4b toward ClSiiPr3.

Scheme 5

Reactivity of 2a,b and 4a,b versus Carbon-Centered Electrophiles

We selected MeI as a carbon-centered electrophile, because it represents a benchmark reagent with numerous examples found in the literature.27,29,32 In the reaction of 2a,b and 4a,b with MeI, the same reactivities in terms of reaction sites were observed. In all cases, alkylation of the negatively charged silicon as well as germanium atoms were found in nearly quantitative yields (Scheme 6). Again, the same tendency was reported in the case of acyclic silenolates and silanides by Ohshita, Ottosson, and Marschner earlier.14,15,28,29,32 The methylated silicon derivatives 9a,b and germanium derivatives 10a,b were obtained as cis/trans mixtures. The silicon atoms of 9a,b undergo a significant low-field shift from −70 to 45 ppm (in the case of the acyl-substituted silicon atom) and from −131 to −84 ppm (for the silyl-substituted silicon atom). This is caused by the lower shielding of the methyl group in comparison to the trimethylsilyl group (see the Experimental Section).

Scheme 6. Reactivity of Dianionic Compounds 2a,b and 4a,b toward MeI.

Scheme 6

Competitive Reactivity of the Silyl Anion and the Silenolate

Finally, we investigated which silanide is more nucleophilic, the silyl anion or the silenolates. Therefore, we reacted 2a,b with 1 equiv of trimethylchlorosilane (ClSiMe3) at −30 °C. The outcome of the reaction was again strongly dependent on the substituent at the carbonyl moiety and reflected our predictions from the computational analyses. 2a with an aryl group attached to the carbonyl moiety reacted with an equimolar amount of ClSiMe3 to form the cyclic silenolate S1a, making the silanide the more nucleophilic reaction center. 2b, on the other hand, reacted with an equimolar amount of ClSiMe3 to give the bicyclic oxahexasilabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-ide 11, which clearly showed that the silenolate is more nucleophilic than the silyl anion in the case of an alkyl substitution. The formation of 11 can be rationalized by assuming the intermediate formation of the silanide 12, which subsequently rearranged to give the bicyclic carbanion 13 by an intramolecular sila-Peterson alkenation. Apparently, 13 is very unstable, losing its intense red color within minutes, presumably by the abstraction of one proton from the surrounding media to give 11 as the final product. Analytical and spectroscopic data (see the Experimental Section) clearly supported the bicyclic structure of 11 (see Scheme 7). Moreover, this compound was obtained by a previous study by our group.27

Scheme 7. Competitive Reactivity of Silyl Anion and Silenolate toward 1 Equiv of ClSiMe3.

Scheme 7

Conclusion

In summary, we synthesized the first examples of mixed functionalized compounds 2a,b and 4a,b, which represent ideal building blocks for highly complex silicon frameworks. These dianions are easily accessible, can be isolated, and were fully characterized. Silenolates 2a,b as well as the germenolates 4a,b adopt the keto form in solution, irrespective of the nature of the R group attached to the carbonyl moiety. Furthermore, the reactivity of 2a,b and 4a,b versus chlorosilanes was investigated as an example of a silicon-centered electrophile. 2a and 4a reacted with ClSiiPr3 to give new examples of a polysilane and a polygermane with an exocyclic double bond. The reaction of 2b with ClSiMe2SiMe2Cl led to the formation of the acyl bicyclo[2.2.2]octasilane 6. Moreover, the reaction of 2a,b and 4a,b with MeI, as a carbon-centered electrophile, led to selective alkylation reactions at the negatively charged silicon and germanium atoms. The methylated structures 9a,b and 10a,b were formed in nearly quantitative yields. Finally, we examined the competitive reactivity of the silyl anion and the silenolate toward 1 equiv of ClSiMe3. The outcome of the reaction was strongly influenced by the substituent at the carbonyl moiety, which was in alignment with our computational analysis. 2a reacted with 1 equiv of ClSiMe3 to give the corresponding cyclic silenolate S1a and demonstrated that the silyl anion is more nucleophilic than the silenolate. In contrast to that, 2b reacted with 1 equiv of ClSiMe3 to give the bicyclic compound 11via an intramolecular sila-Peterson alkenation reaction. This observation clearly showed that the alkyl-substituted silenolate is more nucleophilic than the silyl anion. Further studies to probe the scope of these new dianions are currently in progress.

Experimental Section

All experiments were performed under a nitrogen atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques. Solvents were dried using a column solvent purification system.33 ClSiMe3 (95%), KOtBu (>98%), ClCOMes (99%), ClCOAd (98%) and 18-cr-6 (99%), were used without any further purification. 1H, 13C, and 29Si NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian INOVA 300 spectrometer in C6D6, THF-d8, or CDCl3 solutions and were referenced versus TMS using the internal 2H-lock signal of the solvent. HRMS spectra were obtained on a Kratos Profile mass spectrometer. Infrared spectra were obtained on a Bruker Alpha-P Diamond ATR spectrometer from the solid sample. Melting points were determined using a Stuart SMP50 apparatus and are uncorrected. Elemental analyses were carried out on a Hanau Vario Elementar EL apparatus. UV absorption spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Lambda 5 spectrometer.

Synthesis of 2a

A 500 mg portion of acylcyclohexasilane 1a (0.76 mmol) and 423 mg of 18-cr-6 (1.60 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of Et2O. The solution was then cooled to −70 °C, and 180 mg (1.60 mmol) of KOtBu was added. During the addition, the reaction mixture turned from yellow to dark orange and an orange precipitate began to form. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight for 15 h. The orange precipitate was isolated and washed with Et2O (3 × 5 mL). The orange powder was dried under vacuum (not longer than 5 min; otherwise a slow degradation process occurs) to give 2a. Yield: 775 mg (91%) of analytically pure 2a as an orange powder.

Data for 2a are as follows. Mp: 158–159 °C. Anal. Calcd for C45H92K2O13Si7: C, 48.43; H, 8.31. Found: C, 48.68; H, 8.45. 29Si NMR (THF-d8, TMS, ppm): 0.05 (SiMe3); −27.69, −32.37 (SiMe2); −67.70 (SiCOAryl); −189.08 (Si(SiMe3)). 13C NMR (THF-d8, TMS, ppm): 266.63 (C=O); 154.00, 132.80, 132.50, 128.18 (Aryl-C); 71.03 ((−CH2CH2O−)6); 21.61, 21.29 (Aryl-CH3); 8.92 (Si(CH3)3); 4.33, 1.30 (Si(CH3)2). 1H NMR (THF-d8, TMS, ppm): 6.57 (s, 2H, Mes-H); 3.61 (s, 48H, (−CH2CH2O−)6); 2.38 (s, 6H, Mes-CH3); 2.15 (s, 3H, Mes-CH3); 0.12, 0.05 (s, 33H, Si(CH3)2 and Si(CH3)3). UV–vis: λ [nm] (ε [L mol–1 cm–1]) 450 (6602).

Synthesis of 2b

A 500 mg portion of of acylcyclohexasilane 1b (0.74 mmol) and 413 mg of 18-cr-6 (1.60 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of Et2O. The solution was then cooled to −70 °C, and 175 mg (1.60 mmol) of KOtBu was added. During the addition, the reaction mixture turned from colorless to dark orange and a yellow precipitate began to form. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight for 15 h. The yellow precipitate was isolated and washed with Et2O (3 × 5 mL). The yellow powder was dried under vacuum (not longer than 5 min; otherwise a slow degradation process occurs) to give 2b. Yield: 801 mg (95%) of analytically pure 2b as a yellow powder.

Data for 2b are as follows. Mp: 155–157 °C. Anal. Calcd for C46H96K2O13Si7: C, 48.81; H, 8.55. Found: C, 48.92; H, 8.63. 29Si NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): −1.14 (SiMe3); −26.48, −31.31 (SiMe2); −87.33 (SiCOAryl); −192.42 (Si(SiMe3)). 13C NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 273.96 (C=O); 70.14 ((−CH2CH2O−)6); 50.79 (Ad-C-CO); 40.36, 38.46 (Ad-CH2); 30.17 (Ad-CH); 9.36 (Si(CH3)3); 5.21, 4.11, 2.50 (Si(CH3)2). 1H NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 3.34 (s, 48H, (−CH2CH2O−)6); 2.34, 2.05, 1.96 (bs, 15H Ad-H); 0.95, 0.86, 0.79 (bs, 33H, Si(CH3)2 and Si(CH3)3). UV–vis: λ [nm] (ε [L mol–1 cm–1]) 433 (3730).

Synthesis of 4a

A 500 mg portion of cyclic acylgermane 3a (0.67 mmol) and 372 mg of 18-cr-6 (1.41 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of Et2O. The solution was then cooled to −70 °C, and 158 mg (1.41 mmol) of KOtBu was added. During the addition, the reaction mixture turned from yellow to dark orange and an orange precipitate began to form. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight for 15 h. The orange precipitate was isolated and washed with Et2O (3 × 5 mL). The orange powder was dried under vacuum (not longer than 5 min; otherwise a slow degradation process occurs) to give 4a. Yield: 688 mg (85%) of analytically pure 4a as an orange powder.

Data for 4a are as follows. Mp: 90–92 °C. Anal. Calcd for C45H92Ge2K2O13Si5: C, 44.85; H, 7.70. Found: C, 44.96; H, 7.96. 29Si NMR (THF-d8, TMS, ppm): −0.93 (SiMe3); −27.69, −29.35 (SiMe2). 13C NMR (THF-d8, TMS, ppm): 281.01 (C=O); 154.14, 133.42, 131.23, 129.20, 128.57 (Aryl-C); 71.19 (−CH2CH2O−)6; 21.35, 21.16 (Aryl-CH3); 8.86 (Si(CH3)3); 4.54, 1.93 (Si(CH3)2). 1H NMR (THF-d8, TMS, ppm): 6.54 (s, 2H, Mes-H); 3.62 (s, 48H, (−CH2CH2O−)6); 2.30 (s, 6H, Mes–CH3); 2.14 (s, 3H, Mes–CH3); 0.16 (s, 9H, Si(CH3)3); 0.08 (s, 24H, Si(CH3)2); UV–vis: λ [nm] (ε [L mol–1 cm–1]) = 447 (5753).

Synthesis of 4b

A 500 mg portion of cyclic acylgermane 3b (0.66 mmol) and 365 mg of 18-cr-6 (1.38 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of Et2O. The solution was then cooled to −70 °C and 155 mg (1.38 mmol) of KOtBu was added. During the addition, the reaction mixture turned from colorless to dark orange and a yellow precipitate began to form. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight for 15 h. The yellow precipitate was isolated and washed with Et2O (3 × 5 mL). The yellow powder was dried under vacuum (not longer than 5 min; otherwise a slow degradation process occurs) to give 4b. Yield: 688 mg (88%) of analytically pure 4b as yellow powder.

Data for 4b are as follows. Mp: 190–192 °C. Anal. Calcd for C46H96Ge2K2O13Si5: C, 45.25; H, 7.92. Found: C, 45.30; H, 7.77. 29Si NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 0.36 (SiMe3); −23.45, −25.40 (SiMe2). 13C NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 280.92 (C=O); 70.16 ((−CH2CH2O−)6); 52.11 (Ad-C-CO); 39.78, 38.43 (Ad-CH2); 30.06 (Ad-CH); 9.74 (Si(CH3)3); 5.73, 5.64, 4.23, 2.35 (Si(CH3)2). 1H NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 3.35 (s, 48H, (−CH2CH2O−)6); 2.30, 2.08, 1.95 (m, 15H Ad-H); 1.01, 0.90, (s, each 12H, Si(CH3)2); 0.83 (s, 9H, Si(CH3)3). UV–vis: λ [nm] (ε [L mol–1 cm–1]) 420 (2178).

Synthesis of 5

A 500 mg portion (0.76 mmol) of 1a was dissolved in 20 mL DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 180 mg (1.60 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 2a was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and 309 mg (1.60 mmol) of ClSiiPr3 was added dropwise. The red solution immediately turned yellow. After removal of the volatile components under vacuum, the remaining yellow solid was dissolved in heptane, the solution was filtered through dry Celite, and the solvent was stripped off again. Recrystallization from Et2O afforded 405 mg (64%) of the analytically pure silene 5 as yellow crystals.

Data for 5 are as follows. Mp: 155–157 °C. Anal. Calcd for C39H86OSi9: C, 56.86; H, 10.52. Found: C, 56.90; H, 10.25. 29Si NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 32.83 (Si=C); 13.15 (SiiPr3); −9.07 (SiMe3); −33.90, −34.19, −35.68, −35.84 (SiMe2); −128.70 (Si(SiMe3)(SiiPr3)). 13C NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 199.38 (Si=C); 143.16, 137.21, 137.09, 136.92, 128.85 (Aryl-C); 21.50, 21.21 (Aryl-CH3); 20.83, 18.54 (CH(CH3)2); 15.36, 14.18 (CH(CH3)2); 5.35 (Si(CH3)3); 0.95, 0.50, 0.36, −0.77, −0.92, −2.03, −2.36 (Si(CH3)2). 1H NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 6.80 (s, 2 H, Mes-H); 2.61 (s, 6H, Mes-CH3); 2.12 (s, 3H, Mes-CH3); 1.25–1.07 (m, 42 H, CH(CH3)2); 0.78, 0.74 (s, 3H each, Si(CH3)2); 0.52 (s, 6H each, Si(CH3)2); 0.43–0.42 (s, 15H, Si(CH3)2 and Si(CH3)3); 0.07, 0.02 (s, 3H each, Si(CH3)2). IR (neat): ν(Si=C) 1159 (s) cm–1. HRMS: calcd for [C39H86OSi9]•+ (M+), 822.4602; found, 822.4610.

Synthesis of 6

A 500 mg portion (0.74 mmol) of 1b was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 175 mg (1.60 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 2b was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and 146 mg (0.74 mmol) of ClSiMe2SiMe2Cl was added dropwise. The red solution immediately turned colorless. After aqueous workup with 10 mL of 3% sulfuric acid, the organic layer was separated and dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was stripped off with a rotary evaporator. Drying under vacuum and crystallization from acetone solution at −30 °C afforded 454 mg (95%) of the analytically pure acylbicyclo[2.2.2]octasilane 6 as colorless crystals.

Data for 6 are as follows. Mp: 242–244 °C Anal. Calcd for C26H60OSi9: C, 48.68; H, 9.43. Found: C, 48.75; H, 9.55. 29Si NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): −6.11 (SiMe3); −37.79–38.37 (SiMe2); −77.76 (SiC=O); −131.12 (Si(q)). 13C NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 246.07 (C=O); 51.15 (Ad-C-CO); 37.43, 37.10 (Ad-CH2); 28.57 (Ad-CH); 3.75 (Si(CH3)3); −0.79, −1.31 (Si(CH3)2). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 1.95, 1.80, 1.64 (15H, Ad-H); 0.50, 0.39 (18H each, s, Si(CH3)2); 0.31 (9H, s, Si(CH3)3). IR (neat): ν(C=O) 1618 (m) cm–1. HRMS: calcd for [C26H60OSi9]•+ (M+), 640.2568; found, 640.2590.

Synthesis of 7

A 500 mg portion (0.67 mmol) of 3a was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 158 mg (1.41 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 4a was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and 272 mg (1.41 mmol) of ClSiiPr3 was added dropwise. The red solution immediately turned yellow. After removal of the volatile components under vacuum, the remaining yellow solid was dissolved in heptane, the solution was filtered through dry Celite, and the solvent was stripped off again. Recrystallization from Et2O afforded 558 mg (91%) of the analytically pure germene 7 as yellow crystals.

Data for 7 are as follows. Mp: 108–110 °C. Anal. Calcd for C39H86Ge2OSi7: C, 51.31; H, 9.50. Found: C, 51.45; H, 9.70. 29Si NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): −4.38 (SiMe3); −23.98, −24.83, −29.76, −30.03 (SiMe2). 13C NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 210.17 (Ge=C); 145.26, 137.00, 135.80, 135.67, 128.82 (Aryl-C); 21.57, 21.53 (Aryl-CH3); 20.75, 18.51 (CH(CH3)2); 15.63, 14.12 (CH(CH3)2); 5.74 (Si(CH3)3); 1.41, 1.14, 1.05, 1.00, 0.11, −1.34, −1.36, −1.51 (Si(CH3)2). 1H NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 6.79 (s, 2 H, Mes-H); 2.62 (s, 6H, Mes-CH3); 2.13 (s, 3H, Mes-CH3); 1.38–1.07 (m, 42H, CH(CH3)2); 0.84, 0.82 (s, 3H each, Si(CH3)2); 0.56 (s, 6H each, Si(CH3)2); 0.46–0.45 (s, 15H, Si(CH3)2 and Si(CH3)3); 0.14, 0.12 (s, 3H each, Si(CH3)2). IR (neat): ν(Si=C) 1245 (s) cm–1. HRMS: calcd for [C39H86Ge2OSi7]•+ (M+), 914.3503; found, 914.3509.

Synthesis of 8

A 500 mg portion (0.66 mmol) of 3b was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 155 mg (1.38 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 4b was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and 123 mg (0.66 mmol) of ClSiMe2SiMe2Cl was added dropwise. The red solution immediately turned colorless. After aqueous workup with 10 mL of 3% sulfuric acid, the organic layer was separated and dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was stripped off with a rotary evaporator. Drying under vacuum and subsequent NMR measurement showed complete degradation to an uncharacterizable polymer.

Synthesis of 1c

A 500 mg portion (0.74 mmol) of 1b was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 175 mg (1.60 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 2b was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and 287 mg (1.49 mmol) of ClSiiPr3 was added dropwise. The red solution immediately turned colorless. After aqueous workup with 10 mL of 3% sulfuric acid, the organic layer was separated and dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was stripped off with a rotary evaporator. Drying under vacuum and subsequent NMR measurement showed complete degradation to an uncharacterizable polymer.

Synthesis of 4c

A 500 mg portion (0.66 mmol) of 3b was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 155 mg (1.38 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 4b was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and 267 mg (1.38 mmol) of ClSiiPr3 was added dropwise. The red solution immediately turned colorless. After aqueous workup with 10 mL of 3% sulfuric acid, the organic layer was separated and dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was stripped off with a rotary evaporator. Drying under vacuum and subsequent NMR measurement showed complete degradation to an uncharacterizable polymer.

Synthesis of 9a

A 500 mg portion (0.76 mmol) of 1a was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 180 mg (1.60 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 2a was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and an excess of MeI was added dropwise. The red solution immediately turned yellow. After aqueous workup with 10 mL of 3% sulfuric acid, the organic layer was separated and dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was stripped off with a rotary evaporator. Drying under vacuum afforded 366 mg (89%) of the analytically pure cyclic acylsilane 9a as a cis/trans mixture. The obtained product was recrystallized from acetone, giving yellow crystals of one isomer. Yield: 144 mg (35%) of analytically pure 9a (isomer 1).

Data for 9a (isomer 1) are as follows. Mp: 124–126 °C. Anal. Calcd for C23H50OSi7: C, 51.23; H, 9.35. Found: C, 51.25; H, 9.45. 29Si NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): −11.81 (SiMe3); −40.48 to −40.64 (SiMe2); −46.77 (SiC=O); −84.85 (Si(Me)). 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 251.92 (C=O); 144.75, 137.94, 131.65, 128.82 (Aryl-C); 21.21, 19.48 (Aryl-CH3); 1.22 (Si(CH3)3); −3.00, −4.07, −4.87, −5.67 (Si(CH3)2); −11.24 (SiCH3). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 6.78 (s, 2 H, Mes-H); 2.26 (s, 3H, Mes-CH3); 2.14 (s, 6H, Mes-CH3); 0.29, 0.24, 0.18 0.17 (s, 6H each, Si(CH3)2); 0.19 (s, 9H each, Si(CH3)3); 0.30, 0.15 (s, 3H each, Si(CH3)). HRMS: calcd for [C23H50OSi7]•+ (M+), 538.2247; found, 538.2249.

Data for 9a (isomer 2) are as follows. 29Si NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): −12.48 (SiMe3); −41.59 to −42.55 (SiMe2); −46.69 (SiC=O); −86.18 (Si(Me)). 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 251.86 (C=O).

Synthesis of 9b

A 500 mg portion (0.74 mmol) of 1b was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 175 mg (1.60 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 2b was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and an excess of MeI was added dropwise. The red solution immediately turned colorless. After aqueous workup with 10 mL of 3% sulfuric acid, the organic layer was separated and dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was stripped off with a rotary evaporator. Drying under vacuum afforded 335 mg (81%) of the analytically pure cyclic acylsilane 9b as a cis/trans mixture. Finally, this mixture of isomers was chromatographed on a precoated TLC SIL G-200 UV254 plate, with toluene/heptane (1/5) as eluent, to separate both isomers. Yield: 145 mg (35%) of analytically pure 9b (isomer 1). Yield: 103 mg (25%) of analytically pure 9b (isomer 2).

Data for 9b (isomer 1) are as follows. Mp: 180–183 °C. Anal. Calcd for C24H54OSi7: C, 51.91; H, 9.80. Found: C, 51.82; H, 9.85. 29Si NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): −9.70 (SiMe3); −38.87 to −39.75 (SiMe2); −43.96 (SiC=O); −83.27 (Si(Me)). 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 249.15 (C=O); 51.93 (Ad-C-CO); 36.95, 36.80 (Ad-CH2); 28.17 (Ad-CH); 1.08 (Si(CH3)3); −3.40, −4.42, −4.39, −4.57 (Si(CH3)2); −4.02, −11.21 (SiCH3). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 2.04, 1.71, 1.70 (15H, Ad-H); 0.29 (6H each, s, Si(CH3)2); 0.23, 0.19, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13 (24H, s, Si(CH3)2 and Si(CH3)3); 0.55, 0.11 (s, 3H each, Si(CH3)). HRMS: calcd for [C24H54OSi7]•+ (M+), 554,.2560; found, 554.2566.

Data for 9b (isomer 2) are as follows. Anal. Calcd for C24H54OSi7: C, 51.91; H, 9.80. Found: C, 51.96; H, 9.89. 29Si NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): −9.70 (SiMe3); −38.85 to −39.72 (SiMe2); −43.93 (SiC=O); −83.21 (Si(Me)). 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 249.12 (C=O); 51.94 (Ad-C-CO); 36.97, 36.82 (Ad-CH2); 28.19 (Ad-CH); 1.08 (Si(CH3)3); −3.40, −4.22, −4.39, −4.57 (Si(CH3)2); −4.00, −11.21 (SiCH3). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 2.05, 1.70 (15H, Ad-H); 0.29 (6H each, s, Si(CH3)2); 0.19, 0.17, 0.15, 0.14 (27H, s, Si(CH3)2 and Si(CH3)3); 0.55, 0.11 (s, 3H each, Si(CH3)). HRMS: calcd for [C24H54OSi7]•+ (M+), 554.2560; found, 554.2568.

Synthesis of 10a

A 500 mg portion (0.67 mmol) of 3a was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 158 mg (1.41 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 4a was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and an excess of MeI was added dropwise. The red solution immediately turned yellow. After aqueous workup with 10 mL of 3% sulfuric acid, the organic layer was separated and dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was stripped off with a rotary evaporator. Drying under vacuum afforded 392 mg (93%) of the analytically pure cyclic acylgermane 10a as a cis/trans mixture.

Data for 10a (cis/trans mixture) are as follows. Mp: 134–138 °C. Anal. Calcd for C23H50Ge2OSi5: C, 43.97; H, 8.02. Found: C, 43.85; H, 8.05. 29Si NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): −2.84/–3.78 (SiMe3); −29.19 to −31.29/–30.96, −32.06 (SiMe2). 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 250.52 (C=O); 145.12/144.47, 137.75, 131.03/130.84, 128.71 (Aryl-C); 21.18, 19.30 (Aryl-CH3); 1.95/1.74 (Si(CH3)3); −2.19/–2.60, −3.47/–3.42, −3.95/–3.92, −4.86/–4.13, (Si(CH3)2); −5.25/–5.99, −11.78/–12.17 (GeCH3). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 6.78 (s, 2 H, Mes-H); 2.27 (s, 3H, Mes-CH3); 2.15 (s, 6H, Mes-CH3); 0.41, 0.39, 0.35, 0.32, 0.29, 0.27, 0.26, 0.25, 0.23 (s, 39H each, Si(CH3)2, Si(CH3)3 and Ge(CH3)). HRMS: calcd for [C23H50Ge2OSi5]•+ (M+), 630.1132; found, 628.1140.

Synthesis of 10b

A 500 mg portion (0.66 mmol) of 3b was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 155 mg (1.38 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 4b was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and an excess of MeI was added dropwise. The red solution immediately turned colorless. After aqueous workup with 10 mL of 3% sulfuric acid, the organic layer was separated and dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was stripped off with a rotary evaporator. Drying under vacuum afforded 360 mg (85%) of the analytically pure cyclic acylgermane 10b as a cis/trans mixture. Finally, this mixture of isomers was chromatographed on a precoated TLC SIL G-200 UV254 plate, with toluene/heptane (1/5) as eluent, to separate both isomers. Yield: 80 mg (29%) of analytically pure 10b (isomer 1). Yield: 60 mg (14%) of analytically pure 10b (isomer 2).

Data for 10b (isomer 1) are as follows. Mp: 173–178 °C. Anal. Calcd for C24H54Ge2OSi5: C, 44.74; H, 8.45. Found: C, 44.90; H, 8.52. 29Si NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): −3.63 (SiMe3); −31.45 to −31.79 (SiMe2). 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 247.31 (C=O); 52.14 (Ad-C-CO); 37.00, 36.95 (Ad-CH2); 28.23 (Ad-CH); 1.78 (Si(CH3)3); −2.47, −3.30, −3.46, −4.06 (Si(CH3)2); −3.99, −12.05 (GeCH3). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 2.05, 1.69 (m, 15H, Ad-H); 0.60 (3H, s, Ge(CH3)); 0.33 (6H, s, Si(CH3)2); 0.23, 0.21 (m, 30H each, Si(CH3)2, Si(CH3)3 and Ge(CH3)). HRMS: calcd for [C24H54Ge2OSi5]•+ (M+), 646.1445; found, 644.1452.

Data for 10b (isomer 2) are as follows. Anal. Calcd for C24H54Ge2OSi5: C, 44.74; H, 8.45. Found: C, 44.97; H, 8.59. 29Si NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): −2.86 (SiMe3); −29.53, −30.96 (SiMe2). 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 247.73 (C=O); 52.57 (Ad-C-CO); 37.42, 37.37 (Ad-CH2); 28.65 (Ad-CH); 2.21 (Si(CH3)3); −2.04, −2.87, −3.03, −3.63 (Si(CH3)2); −3.57, −11.63 (GeCH3). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 2.06, 1.70 (15H, Ad-H), 0.49 (3H, s, Ge(CH3)); 0.32, 0.28, 0.26, 0.23, 0.21 (36H, m, Si(CH3)2, Si(CH3)3 and Ge(CH3)). HRMS: calcd for [C24H54Ge2OSi5]•+ (M+), 646.1445; found, 644.1442.

Competitive Reactivity of 1a

A 500 mg portion (0.76 mmol) of 1a was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 180 mg (1.60 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 2a was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and 83 mg (0.76 mmol) of ClSiMe3 was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for an additional 30 min. At this time, reaction control by NMR showed that the cyclic silenolate S1a was completely formed.

Data for S1a are as follows. 29Si NMR (THF-d8, TMS, ppm): −9.00 (SiMe3); −29.61 to −36.72 (SiMe2); −78.00 (SiC=O); −131.17 (Si(q)). 13C NMR (THF-d8, TMS, ppm): 263.96 (C=O); 151.90, 132.71, 131.65, 127.38 (Aryl-C); 20.13, 20.10 (Aryl-CH3); 3.42 (Si(CH3)3); −0.26, −1.17 (Si(CH3)2). 1H NMR (THF-d8, TMS, ppm): 6.62 (s, 2 H, Mes-H); 2.35 (s, 6H, Mes-CH3); 2.16 (s, 3H, Mes-CH3); 0.22 (18H, s, Si(CH3)3), 0.11, 0.10, 0.07, 0.05, 0.04 (24H, m, Si(CH3)2).

Competitive Reactivity of 1b

A 500 mg portion (0.74 mmol) of 1b was dissolved in 20 mL of DME and cooled to −30 °C, and 175 mg (1.60 mmol) of KOtBu was added. After it was stirred for an additional 30 min, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and finally stirred for an additional 14 h. At this time, reaction control by 29Si NMR showed that the dianionic species 2b was completely formed. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was cooled to −30 °C and 81 mg (0.74 mmol) of ClSiMe3 was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for an additional 30 min. At this time, reaction control by NMR showed that 9 was completely formed. After aqueous workup with 100 mL of 3% sulfuric acid, the organic layer was separated and dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was stripped off on a rotary evaporator. Finally, the crude material was chromatographed on a precoated TLC SIL G-200 UV254 plate, with with heptane as eluent, to give 268 mg (60%) of 11.

Data for 11 are as follows. Mp: 218–222 °C. Anal. Calcd for C25H58OSi8: C, 50.09; H, 9.75. Found: C, 50.17; H, 9.68. 29Si NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 8.57 (OSiMe2); 6.81 (Siq-OSiMe2); −7.36, – 16.85 (SiMe3); −39.43, −43.33, −48.13 (SiMe2); −79.34 (Siq). 13C NMR (C6D6, TMS, ppm): 47.01, 37.53, 36.50, 29.49 (Ad-C); 35.34 (CH-Ad); 2.91, 0.32 (Si(CH3)3); 3.15, 2.55, −1.25, −2.27, −2.34, −2.70, −5.52, −6.55 (Si(CH3)2). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, ppm): 1.97–1.58 (m, 16H, Ad-H and CH-Ad); 0.49, 0.42, 0.39, 0.36, 0.28, 0.26, 0.25, 0.17 (s, 3H each, Si(CH3)2); 0.34, 0.32 (s, 9H each, Si(CH3)3). HRMS: calcd for [C25H58OSi8]•+ (M+), 598.2642; found, 598.2646.

Acknowledgments

We thank the FWF (Wien, Austria) for financial support (project number P32606-N).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.organomet.0c00385.

  • NMR spectra, crystallographic details, and computational section (PDF)

  • Cartesian coordinates of the calculated structures (XYZ)

Accession Codes

CCDC 1964268–1964270 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

om0c00385_si_002.xyz (12.8KB, xyz)

References

  1. Miller R. D.; Michl J. Polysilane high polymers. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1359–1410. 10.1021/cr00096a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. West R. The polysilane high polymers. J. Organomet. Chem. 1986, 300, 327–346. 10.1016/0022-328X(86)84068-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. West R.Organopolysilanes. In Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II; Elsevier: 1995; pp 77–110. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ishikawa M.; Iyoda J.; Ikeda H.; Kotake K.; Hashimoto T.; Kumada M. Aluminum chloride catalyzed skeletal rearrangement of permethylated acyclic polysilanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4845–4850. 10.1021/ja00406a029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jarvie A. W. P.; Winkler H. J. S.; Peterson D. J.; Gilman H. Preparation and Characterization of Octaphenylcyclotetrasilane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 1921–1924. 10.1021/ja01469a034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilman H.; Tomasi R. A. Synthesis of a Nonasilane. Chem. Ind. 1963, 954. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hengge E.; Wolfer D. Darstellung und eigenschaften von heterocyclischen silanen des typs Si4X Mit X = B, N, O. J. Organomet. Chem. 1974, 66, 413–424. 10.1016/S0022-328X(00)81555-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Becker G.; Hartmann H.-M.; Hengge E.; Schrank F. Molekl- und Kristallstruktur des 1,4-Bis[tris(tetrahydrofuran)lithium]-octaphenyltetrasilans. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1989, 572, 63–74. 10.1002/zaac.19895720108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sekiguchi A.; Ichinohe M.; Yamaguchi S. An Unexpected Reaction of Silacyclopropene To Form an Organodilithiosilane: Isolation and Characterization of a 1,1-Dilithiosilane Derivative. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10231–10232. 10.1021/ja991694i. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tokitoh N.; Hatano K.; Sadahiro T.; Okazaki R. Generation and Reactions of an Overcrowded Diaryldilithiosilane. Chem. Lett. 1999, 28, 931–932. 10.1246/cl.1999.931. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kira M.; Iwamoto T.; Yin D.; Maruyama T.; Sakurai H. Novel 1,2-Dilithiodisilanes Derived from Reduction of Stable Tetrakis(trialkylsilyl)disilenes with Lithium Metal. Chem. Lett. 2001, 30, 910–911. 10.1246/cl.2001.910. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Apeloig Y.; Korogodsky G.; Bravo-Zhivotovskii D.; Bläser D.; Boese R. The Syntheses and Molecular Structure of a Branched Oligosilyl Anion with a Record of Nine Silicon Atoms and of the First Branched Oligosilyl Dianion. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 2000, 1091–1095. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0682(200005)2000:5<1091::AID-EJIC1091>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marschner C. A New and Easy Route to Polysilanylpotassium Compounds. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 1998, 221–226. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0682(199802)1998:2<221::AID-EJIC221>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kayser C.; Kickelbick G.; Marschner C. Simple Synthesis of Oligosilyl-α,ω-dipotassium Compounds. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 989–992. 10.1002/1521-3773(20020315)41:6<989::AID-ANIE989>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kayser C.; Fischer R.; Baumgartner J.; Marschner C. Tailor-made Oligosilyl Potassium Compounds. Organometallics 2002, 21, 1023–1030. 10.1021/om010815w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fischer R.; Konopa T.; Ully S.; Baumgartner J.; Marschner C. Route Si6 revisited. J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 685, 79–92. 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2003.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marro E. A.; Press E. M.; Purkait T. K.; Jimenez D.; Siegler M. A.; Klausen R. S. Cooperative Noncovalent Interactions Induce Ion Pair Separation in Diphenylsilanides. Chem. - Eur. J. 2017, 23, 15633–15637. 10.1002/chem.201704217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Press E. M.; Marro E. A.; Surampudi S. K.; Siegler M. A.; Tang J. A.; Klausen R. S. Synthesis of a Fragment of Crystalline Silicon: Poly(Cyclosilane). Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 568–572. 10.1002/anie.201610208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Purkait T. K.; Press E. M.; Marro E. A.; Siegler M. A.; Klausen R. S. Low-Energy Electronic Transition in SiB Rings. Organometallics 2019, 38, 1688–1698. 10.1021/acs.organomet.8b00804. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Marro E. A.; Folster C. P.; Press E. M.; Im H.; Ferguson J. T.; Siegler M. A.; Klausen R. S. Stereocontrolled Syntheses of Functionalized cis- and trans-Siladecalins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 17926–17936. 10.1021/jacs.9b09902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heider Y.; Willmes P.; Huch V.; Zimmer M.; Scheschkewitz D. Boron and Phosphorus Containing Heterosiliconoids: Stable p- and n-Doped Unsaturated Silicon Clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 19498–19504. 10.1021/jacs.9b11181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Haas M.; Knoechl A.; Wiesner T.; Torvisco A.; Fischer R.; Jones C. Attempted Synthesis of a Homocyclic Bis(silyl)silylene Leads to the Formation of a Tricyclo[3,1,1,1 2,4 ]octasilane. Organometallics 2019, 38, 4158–4170. 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00507. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Haas M.; Fischer R.; Flock M.; Mueller S.; Rausch M.; Saf R.; Torvisco A.; Stueger H. Stable Silenolates and Brook-Type Silenes with Exocyclic Structures. Organometallics 2014, 33, 5956–5959. 10.1021/om500935r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Haas M.; Leypold M.; Schnalzer D.; Torvisco A.; Stueger H. Stable Germenolates and Germenes with Exocyclic Structures. Organometallics 2015, 34, 5291–5297. 10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00750. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Reichardt C.; Welton T.. Solvents and solvent effects in organic chemistry, 4th updated and enlarged ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  26. A conformational analysis was performed on related silenolates and showed an energetic distribution: chair (60%) vs boat (40%). See ref (27).
  27. Haas M.; Leypold M.; Schuh L.; Fischer R.; Torvisco A.; Stueger H. Reactivity of Cyclic Silenolates Revisited. Organometallics 2017, 36, 3765–3773. 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00540. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ohshita J.; Masaoka S.; Masaoka Y.; Hasebe H.; Ishikawa M.; Tachibana A.; Yano T.; Yamabe T. Silicon–Carbon Unsaturated Compounds. 55. Synthesis and Reactions of Lithium Silenolates, Silicon Analogs of Lithium Enolates. Organometallics 1996, 15, 3136–3146. 10.1021/om950898e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ohshita J.; Masaoka S.; Morimoto Y.; Ishikawa M. Reactions of Lithium Silenolates with Carbonyl Compounds. Organometallics 1997, 16, 910–917. 10.1021/om960693l. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stueger H.; Hasken B.; Gross U.; Fischer R.; Torvisco Gomez A. Synthesis and Properties of Bridgehead-Functionalized Permethylbicyclo2.2.2octasilanes. Organometallics 2013, 32, 4490–4500. 10.1021/om400184y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Biltueva I. S.; Bravo-Zhivotovskii D. A.; Kalikhman I. D.; Vitkovskii V. Y.; Shevchenko S. G.; Vyazankin N. S.; Voronkov M. G. Sila- and germa-enolate anions. The reaction of acylgermanes with triethylgermyllithium. J. Organomet. Chem. 1989, 368, 163–165. 10.1016/0022-328X(89)85310-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Guliashvili T.; El-Sayed I.; Fischer A.; Ottosson H. The first isolable 2-silenolate. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1640–1642. 10.1002/anie.200250400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pangborn A. B.; Giardello M. A.; Grubbs R. H.; Rosen R. K.; Timmers F. J. Safe and Convenient Procedure for Solvent Purification. Organometallics 1996, 15, 1518–1520. 10.1021/om9503712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

om0c00385_si_002.xyz (12.8KB, xyz)

Articles from Organometallics are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES