In 2015, all the member states of the United Nations signed up to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [1]. SDG 3 aims to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.” Central to this goal are the concepts of health and well-being. This is at least as true for adolescents (10–19 years) as for any other age group. The United Nations Secretary General’s Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016–2030), which aims to “ensure health and well-being for every woman, child and adolescent” within the context of the SDGs, recognizes that adolescents will be central to the overall success of the strategy [2]. Similarly, the World Health Organization (WHO)–United Nations International Children’s Fund–Lancet Commission calls for children (defined as <18 years of age) to be at the center of the SDGs [3]. A recent call was also made for Universal Health Coverage to take a comprehensive approach to addressing the health and well-being needs of adolescents [4].
Adolescent well-being is a personal and societal good in its own right, and at the same time, adolescence is a critical period of the life course when many of the factors that contribute to lifelong well-being are, or are not, acquired or solidified. The direct and indirect effects on adolescents’ well-being of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and the responses to it have reinforced the importance of systems being in place to support the well-being of adolescents. But what is adolescent well-being? And how do adolescent well-being and adolescent health relate to each other?
As a contribution to answering these questions, the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health and the WHO are leading an initiative of the United Nations H6+ Technical Working Group on Adolescent Health and Well-Being to develop a consensus framework for defining, programming, and measuring adolescent well-being [5]. This framework adds to recent work to develop a Nurturing Care Framework for early child development [6]. It is also part of a broader program of work that includes a multistakeholder Call to Action to prioritize adolescent well-being [7], building momentum for a 2022 “Global Summit on Adolescents,” which will review progress and aim to increase political and financial investments for this population group [8].
Many descriptions of well-being have been developed [9]. Two conceptual approaches dominate discussions: subjective and objective well-being. Subjective constructs emphasize personal experiences and individual fulfillment, which include eudaemonic well-being (e.g., finding meaning in life and experiencing a sense of personal growth), hedonic well-being (e.g., feeling happy and being satisfied with one’s own life), as well as others (e.g., optimism) [10,11]. In contrast, objective approaches define well-being in terms of quality of life indicators such as material resources (e.g., income, food, and housing) and social attributes (education, health, political voice, social networks, and connections) [12]. Such objective indicators commonly reflect capabilities, which include both an individual’s functioning and the opportunities provided in a given environment, as argued by Sen [13]. “Relational well-being” emphasizes that an individual’s well-being is heavily influenced by their relationships, with well-being seen as emerging “...through the dynamic interplay of personal, societal, and environmental structures and processes…” [14].
Indicators to measure adolescent well-being reflect these two concepts to differing degrees. Measures of subjective well-being apply indicators such as the subjective well-being measure used in the Gallup World Poll [15] and psychological need satisfaction and frustration scales [16], whereas measures of objective well-being use indicators such as the Global Youth Development Index [17], positive youth development indicators [18], or developmental assets scores [19].
Definition and Framework
Based on a scoping of the literature and consultations across the UN H6+ Technical Working Group, youth networks, and adolescent-serving organizations, we propose a short and an expanded definition of adolescent well-being (Box 1). We also propose five interconnected domains for adolescent well-being and the requirements for adolescents to achieve well-being within each of these domains (Table 1). The five domains encompass both subjective and objective constructs and include health as one of the five domains. The domains are also underpinned by gender, equity, and rights considerations. An individual’s degree of independence to access opportunities that foster their own well-being will vary across the decade of adolescence. Although important at all ages, adolescent well-being may, therefore, require greater adult support at younger ages.
Box 1. Definitions.
Proposed definition of adolescent well-being.
Adolescents thrive and are able to achieve their full potential.
Expanded definition.
Adolescents have the support, confidence, and resources to thrive in contexts of secure and healthy relationships, realizing their full potential and rights.
Table 1.
No. | Domain | Subdomains | Requirements include | Type of well-being |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Good health and optimum nutrition |
|
|
Physical Nutritional Emotional Sociocultural |
2. | Connectedness, positive values, and contribution to society |
|
|
Emotional Sociocultural |
3. | Safety and a supportive environment |
|
|
Physical Emotional Sociocultural |
4. | Learning, competence, education, skills, and employability |
|
|
Emotional Cognitive |
5. | Agency and resilience |
|
|
Emotional Cognitive |
The examples that are given in the subdomains and the requirements to achieve these are illustrative and not exhaustive.
Implications for Policy and Practice
The definition of adolescent well-being and its five domains applies everywhere and is relevant for all adolescents, including males and females, wealthy and poor, and the able-bodied and those with chronic disability, for example. They also emphasize the multidimensional nature of well-being. Therefore, programming to improve adolescent well-being will require a multisectoral approach, and the measurement of adolescent well-being will require multidimensional indicators that encompass all five domains and include both subjective and objective measures. It is for this reason that in addition to working toward a consensus set of health indicators, the multiagency Global Action for Measurement of Adolescent Health initiative led by WHO involves assessing indicators of adolescent well-being, with a view to agreeing on a core set of well-being indicators [20].
Conclusion
Maintaining and improving the well-being of its citizens is the fundamental duty of all governments, supported by the United Nations, civil society organizations, private sector, families and communities, adolescents, among many others. This requires a clear definition and measurable indicators. Given the multidimensional nature of well-being, spanning five domains, it will be essential that multiple sectors unite behind the common objective of improving well-being, using a common set of definitions, concepts, and indicators. Here, focusing on adolescents, we have proposed the first two of these requirements—a clear definition and description of five domains that underpin a conceptual framework for adolescent well-being, whereas work continues on the development of the common set of indicators and the policy and programming implications of this framework.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank members of the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health Adolescents and Youth Constituency and the UN Major Group for Children and Youth: Sharaf Boborakhimov, Y-PEER, Tajikistan; Toyin Chukwudozie, Education as a Vaccine, Nigeria; Margianta Surahman Juhanda Dinata, Lentera Anak Foundation, Emancipate Indonesia, Indonesia; Enes Efendioğlu, Civil Life Association, Turkey; Souzana Humsi, Y-PEER, Syria; Cynthia Lam, Consultant, Global Coordination Mechanism on the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization; Aditi Mukherji, The YP Foundation, India; Desmond Nji Atanga, Cameroon Youth Network, Cameroon; Renata Samuels, Department of Youth Services, Ministry of Health, Belize; Kobe Smith, Guyana Responsible Parenthood Association/Youth Advocacy Movement, Guyana; Josiah Tualamali’i, Commonwealth Youth Health Network/PYLAT Pacific Youth Leadership and Transformation Trust, New Zealand; Victor Ugo, Mentally Aware Nigeria Initiative/United for Global Mental Health, Nigeria; Andrej Vujkovac, International Youth Health Organization, Slovenia; William Yeung, ReachOut, Australia; and Mohammed Amin Zurak, Zurak Cancer Foundation, Ghana for their suggestions.
The authors also thank Jenelle Babb and Sally Beadle, UNESCO; Nina Ferencic, UNICEF; Joanna Lai, UNICEF; Ani Shakarishvili, UNAIDS; Ilaria Schibba, World Food Programme; and, Jennifer Williams, Plan UK International for their support.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- 1.United Nations Sustainable development goals. New York, United Nations. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals Available at:
- 2.The global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health 2016–2030. Every woman every child. 2015. http://www.everywomaneverychild.org/globalstrategy Available at: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clark H., Coll-Seck A.M., Banerjee A. A future for the world’s children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;395:605–658. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32540-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.WHO, UNICEF, Plan International, International Association for Adolescent Health, Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health, Child Health Initiative, UN Major Group for Children and Youth, UNFPA . 2019. Adolescent health – the missing population in universal health coverage.https://plan-uk.org/file/plan-adolescent-health-reportpdf/download?token=VVsY-cTp Available at: [Google Scholar]
- 5.WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2016. Promoting health through the life-course. H6: Harnessing the collective strengths of the UN system to reach every woman, child and adolescent.https://www.who.int/life-course/partners/h4/en/ Available at: [Google Scholar]
- 6.WHO, UNICEF, World Bank Group . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2018. Nurturing care for early childhood development: A framework for helping children survive and thrive to transform health and human potential.https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272603/9789241514064-eng.pdf Available at: [Google Scholar]
- 7.UN Major Group for Children and Youth, Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health, WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, Plan International UK and the Child Health Initiative Make adolescent well-being a priority: An urgent call to action (Version 3.0) www.adolescents2030.org Available at:
- 8.Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health PMNCH calls for action on adolescent wellbeing at the ICPD25 Summit, 12 November 2019, Nairobi Kenya. https://www.who.int/pmnch/media/news/2019/ICPD25-call-for-action/en Available at:
- 9.Dodge R., Daly A., Huyton J. The challenge of defining wellbeing. Internat J Wellbeing. 2012;2:222–235. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Martín-María N., Miret M., Caballero F.F. The impact of subjective well-being on mortality: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies in the general population. Psychosom Med. 2017;79:565–575. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Steptoe A., Deaton A., Stone A.A. Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. Lancet. 2015;385:640–648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Western M., Tomaszewski W. Subjective wellbeing, objective wellbeing and inequality in Australia. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sen A. Human rights and capabilities. J Hum Dev. 2005;6:151–166. [Google Scholar]
- 14.White S. Relational wellbeing: Re-centring the politics of happiness, policy and the self. Policy Polit. 2017;45:121–136. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Diener E., Tay L. Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. Int J Psychol. 2015;50:135–149. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen B., Vansteenkiste M., Beyers W. Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motiv Emot. 2015;39:216–236. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Commonwealth Secretariat . Commonwealth Secretariat; London: 2016. Global Youth Development Index and Report 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hinson L., Kapungu C., Jessee C. YouthPower Learning, Making Cents International; Washington DC: 2016. Measuring positive youth development toolkit: A Guide for implementers of youth programs. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Search Institute . Search Institute; Minneapolis, USA: 2016. User guide for the developmental assets profile.https://www.search-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/DAP-User-Guide-1-2016.pdf Available at: [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guthold R., Moller A.B., Azzopardi P. The Global Action for Measurement of Adolescent Health (GAMA) initiative—Rethinking adolescent metrics. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64:697–699. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]