Abstract
The origin of bilateral symmetry, a major transition in animal evolution, coincided with the evolution of organized nervous systems that show regionalization along major body axes. Studies of Xenacoelomorpha, the likely outgroup lineage to all other animals with bilateral symmetry, can inform the evolutionary history of animal nervous systems. Here, we characterized the neural anatomy of the acoel Hofstenia miamia. Our analysis of transcriptomic data uncovered orthologues of enzymes for all major neurotransmitter synthesis pathways. Expression patterns of these enzymes revealed the presence of a nerve net and an anterior condensation of neural cells. The anterior condensation was layered, containing several cell types with distinct molecular identities organized in spatially distinct territories. Using these anterior cell types and structures as landmarks, we obtained a detailed timeline for regeneration of the H. miamia nervous system, showing that the anterior condensation is restored by eight days after amputation. Our work detailing neural anatomy in H. miamia will enable mechanistic studies of neural cell type diversity and regeneration and provide insight into the evolution of these processes.
Keywords: acoels, evolution, nervous system, regeneration, Xenacoelomorpha
1. Introduction
Nervous systems vary in their composition and structure across animals, yet many genetic components of the nervous system are as ancient as the transition to animal multicellularity [1,2]. Despite some debate about the precise timing of their origin, animal nervous systems have a pre-bilaterian origin [3–9]. The evolution of bilateral symmetry, i.e. the origin of animals with clear anterior–posterior (AP) and dorsal–ventral (DV) axes around 550 Ma [10], corresponded to a major transition in nervous system evolution that led to the formation of (i) highly organized nervous systems that were restricted along the major body axes and (ii) an expansion of neural cell type diversity. Most bilaterian lineages, including ecdysozoans, spiralians and deuterostomes, collectively known as the Nephrozoa, have these features [11–16], and their genomes encode key enzymes for major neurotransmitter synthesis pathways (figure 1). The phylum Xenacoelomorpha (xenoturbellids, nemertodermatids, and acoels), a lineage hypothesized as the sister-group to all other bilaterians [11,12,25–27], is phylogenetically positioned to inform the evolution of metazoan nervous systems with regards to their structure and composition. In particular, functional studies of neural specification and patterning in xenacoelomorphs are needed to infer how genetic pathways underlying these processes have evolved. These studies would also inform the evolution of animal nervous systems [28–30] in the alternative scenario that places xenacoelomorphs as sister to Ambulacraria [31,32].
Studies of neural anatomy in the three major xenacoelomorph groups have shown diversity in neural structures as well as in their composition with regards to neural cell types. Xenoturbellids have an intraepidermal nerve net with no areas of condensation [17,18]. Nemertodermatids have a subepidermal nerve plexus and a ring process located at or around the statocyst, a sensory structure found in all xenacoelomorphs that is hypothesized to be involved in sensing gravity [33]. Characterized acoel nervous systems range from a low degree of centralization to having anterior condensations with organized structures, such as ring-shaped commissures and ventral lobes located anteriorly within the Crucimusculata, a large clade of fast-evolving acoels that includes relatively better-studied species [12,19,34–43]. Notably, all three xenacoelomorph groups show the presence of nerve nets and a consistent restriction of condensed structures along the DV axis is lacking, despite the presence of a bilaterally symmetric body plan. Genetic pathways that organize xenacoelomorph nervous systems and the functional roles of genes controlling other bilaterian nervous systems within xenacoelomorphs remain unknown.
We sought to define neural anatomy in the acoel Hofstenia miamia, which is amenable to mechanistic studies of nervous system development and regeneration. We analysed the H. miamia transcriptome [44] to identify homologues of genes from major neurotransmitter synthesis pathways. Previous work using transverse sections in H. miamia has shown that the nervous system is ring- or cylinder-shaped and completely encircles the pharynx in the anterior of the animal [45,46]. Our studies in H. miamia identified a subepidermal nerve net throughout the animal and an anterior condensation with layered organization that showed asymmetry along the DV axis. We assessed the organization of the nervous system in relationship to musculature and found that neural cells are detectable on either side of the body wall musculature, but are always internal to the peripheral longitudinal musculature. We determined the precise spatial and temporal sequence of events for regeneration of major cell types and structures in this nervous system and for rescaling of the anterior condensation relative to the body length. Our work establishes a robust framework for identification of molecular pathways that control xenacoelomorph nervous systems.
2. Material and methods
(a). Animal husbandry
Animals were kept in plastic boxes at 21°C in artificial sea water, and fed brine shrimp and rotifers twice weekly, as described previously [27].
(b). Neural gene identification and phylogenetic analysis
We queried known neurotransmitter synthesis genes from H. sapiens, M. musculus, D. rerio and D. melanogaster against the H. miamia transcriptome [44] to determine putative orthologues (electronic supplementary material, table S1). In some cases, phylogenetic analyses were used to establish orthology of the proteins encoded by these transcripts (electronic supplementary material, figure S1b). Protein sequences were aligned using MAFFT (v7) [47]. Alignments were trimmed using Gblocks [48] using the least stringent parameters. Phylogenetic trees were inferred using maximum likelihood analyses, with 1000 bootstrap replicates, implemented in RAxML (v8.2.4) [49] using the WAG + G model of protein evolution.
(c). Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
Prior to fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), animals were starved for one week and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Triton (PBST) for 1 h at room temperature. Genes were amplified by PCR from cDNA (from adult animals, regenerative time points and embryonic stages) and cloned into the pGEM T-easy vector. The FISH protocol was followed as previously described [27]. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using commercially available primary antibodies (FMRFamide; EMDMillipore AB15348, Tyrosinated tubulin; Sigma-Aldrich T9028) and custom antibodies for Tropomyosin (see section below). For detailed IHC protocol, see method in electronic supplementary material.
(d). Custom tropomyosin antibodies
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies were custom-made by GenScript via the PolyExpress Premium using the H. miamia protein sequence for Tropomyosin (electronic supplementary material, table S2). Recombinant protein or protein fragments were expressed in E. coli using the provided protein sequence and then used to immunize two rabbits. Two antibodies (#2995 and #2997) were generated and their target binding was validated by Western Blot with the protein immunogen. Both antibodies were used together in IHC experiments at 1 µg ml−1.
(e). Confocal microscopy and image processing
Specimens were imaged using a Leica SP8. At least three animals were imaged per experiment. To determine co-expression, animals were imaged at 63 × magnification in the anterior condensation in three different areas dorsally and two different areas ventrally. Single z-planes were examined for co-expression.
(f). Determining the ratio of the anterior condensation length to body length
To determine the proportion of the body length occupied by the anterior condensation in intact animals and during regeneration, we performed two measurements (figure 6b; electronic supplementary material, table S3). The span of the anterior condensation (AC) was measured as the length of a line segment drawn from the most anterior region of the animal where glutamate decarboxylase-1 (gad-1) expression was detectable to the end of the anterior condensation. The second measurement, body length (B), was the length of a line segment from the same position at the most anterior region of the animal to the tip of the tail. The AC : B ratio provided the proportion of the body length occupied by the anterior condensation. Measurements for regenerating tail fragments started 3 days post amputation (dpa), when concentrated gad-1 expression first became observable in the anterior region.
3. Results
(a). The Hofstenia miamia genome encodes a full complement of enzymes for major neurotransmitter synthesis pathways
We queried the transcriptome sequence data available for H. miamia [44] for sequences homologous to known neurotransmitter synthesis genes and assigned orthology using sequence similarity or phylogenetic analyses as appropriate (see methods, electronic supplementary material, table S1 and figure S1b). We identified putative orthologues of enzymes required for the synthesis of neurotransmitters including monoamines (serotonin, histamine, catecholamines epinephrine, norepinephrine and dopamine), acetylcholine, and the amino acid signalling molecules glutamate and GABA in the H. miamia transcriptome (figure 1). Many of these neural components are found in nephrozoans and in cnidarians, the outgroup lineage to bilaterians. Their presence in H. miamia is consistent with them being ancestral eumetazoan sensu stricto (cnidarian + bilaterian) characteristics. Notably, the histamine synthesis pathway was found in the H. miamia genome but has not been detected in non-bilaterian genomes studied thus far, suggesting it is a bilaterian innovation. The complement of neural genes shared between H. miamia and other bilaterians suggests that the lack of certain neurotransmitter synthesis pathways in xenoturbellids, nemertodermatids and other acoels [18,20–24,37,50] represents either a loss of genes in these lineages or a failure of the currently available genomic and transcriptomic resources in these species to detect these components.
(b). Hofstenia miamia has an organized nervous system with a complex anterior condensation
To determine which structures are present within the H. miamia nervous system, we performed immunohistochemistry using commercially available antibodies for FMRFamide (FMRF) and tyrosinated tubulin (Tyr-tubulin), which label neurons across diverse animals. Confocal imaging from both dorsal and ventral sides identified (i) an organized, prominent neural structure located in the anterior and (ii) a subepidermal nerve net throughout the rest of the body (figure 2a–k). This anterior structure satisfies some definitions of a brain (e.g. it is a conglomeration of highly interconnected nerve cells [51]), but does not meet others (e.g. we did not identify an outer cortex of cell bodies with a central neuropil [50]). Therefore, in this manuscript, we refer to this brain-like structure with its many organized regions as the anterior condensation.
Immunostaining showed that the anterior condensation is composed of reticulated neurite bundles, i.e. bundles of neural processes, that are wrapped around clusters of nuclei (figure 2b–h). Tyr-tubulin immunostaining revealed a strongly labelled cell within each group of clustered nuclei (figure 2g,h,i,k). We hypothesize these cells are putatively sensory in function based on their morphology and multiciliated structure. Tyr-tubulin also labelled the frontal organ (figure 2i,j), a secretory and sensory structure common within acoels [52]. This structure showed multiple finger-like projections located in the anterior, near the DV margin. Another sensory structure, the statocyst, which contains a mineralized statolith surrounded by a ciliated structure and is located dorsally just above the mouth, has been reported in the previous work [27].
In a fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) screen for expression of putative neural genes, the expression of the glutamate decarboxylase-1 (gad-1) gene revealed additional neural structures within the anterior condensation (figure 2l–v). The periphery of the anterior condensation labelled by gad-1 marked the same reticulated neurite bundles as observed with FMRF and Tyr-tubulin immunostaining (figure 2b–h). This network showed no obvious asymmetries along the DV axis, connecting fully around the circumference of the anterior condensation (figure 2m,n). Internal to the neurite bundle network, densely packed gad-1+ cells were detected (figure 2o,p). This population of putative neurons did not form a continuous structure along the DV span of the condensation. Although present throughout the dorsal side, gad-1+ cells were absent from the ventral midline, giving the appearance of ventral lobe-like structures. The layered structure of gad-1+ cells provides useful landmarks for understanding neural anatomy in H. miamia, and therefore, we refer to the peripheral region with neurite bundles as ‘Layer I’ and the internal layer of densely packed gad-1+ cells as ‘Layer II’.
On the dorsal side underneath Layer II, a transversely oriented gad-1+ neurite bundle with a ring-like shape in its centre was observed. We refer to this structure as the ‘dorsal commissure’ because this bundle was present dorsal to the pharynx and it extended between the left and right sides of the animal (figure 2q, inset). The pharynx, located ventrally to the dorsal commissure, also contained gad-1+ cells, probably marking pharyngeal neurons (figure 2r). The external opening of the pharynx, i.e. the mouth, contained a ring of gad-1+ cells that we refer to as the oral nerve ring (figure 2p). The schematics in figure 2 provide a summary of these results as would be observed in a transverse section through the anterior condensation (figure 2w,x).
Another gene in our FISH screen, transient receptor potential ion channel M-1 (TrpM-1), labelled cells throughout the animal but its expression was concentrated in the anterior, revealing further structures within the anterior condensation (figure 2t). TrpM-1+ cells were arranged in clusters, reminiscent of the clusters of nuclei observed previously within the neurite bundles (figure 2b–h). Double-FISH with TrpM-1 and gad-1 probes revealed that TrpM-1+ cell clusters were surrounded by gad-1+ neurite bundles within Layer I (figure 2t,u). Imaging of these TrpM-1+ cell clusters in transverse view showed that they are present in both Layer I and Layer II, and that the clusters are contiguous between the two layers (figure 2v).
(c). Nervous system components are present both internal and external to body wall musculature
Xenacoelomorph species display variable placement of neural elements relative to body wall musculature [33,40], e.g. intraepidermal nerve nets external to musculature (xenoturbellids), condensed neural elements placed external to body wall musculature (nemertodermatids), and neural condensations present internal to body wall musculature (acoels). In H. miamia, histological studies had revealed a subepidermal nerve plexus present external to longitudinal body wall musculature, and some neural cells present internally, close to the statocyst [46,53]. To determine the spatial relationship of the musculature and the H. miamia nervous system using molecular markers, we coupled Tropomyosin immunostaining using custom antibodies with gad-1 FISH (figure 3; electronic supplementary material, figure S2, and movies S1, S2). This identified two major muscular structures, peripheral longitudinal muscle and a set of internal body wall musculature that includes circumferential, longitudinal and diagonal muscle fibers. In the anterior, Layer I gad-1+ neurite bundles were found internal to the peripheral muscle but external to the body wall musculature (figure 3a–d), with Layer II gad-1+ cells lying internal to the body wall musculature (figure 3d,e). A similar organization was observed in more posterior regions of the animal with the gad-1+ nerve net sitting between the peripheral and body wall muscle layers (figure 3a,f,g,h,i). We also observed the presence of gad-1+ cells internal to the body wall muscle, which could not be distinguished from the nerve net without labelling of muscle (figure 3i). Further studies will be needed to determine if the close connections between muscle fibres and gad-1+ cells (figure 3j) represent neuromuscular junctions. The schematic in figure 3 provides an overview of neural components in relation to the body wall musculature (figure 3k).
(d). Neurotransmitter synthesis genes are expressed in diverse neural populations
With a better understanding of H. miamia neuroanatomy and its genomic repertoire of neurotransmitter synthesis pathways, we sought to determine the number and spatial distribution of neural cell subtypes. Our efforts in determining the expression patterns of all identified homologues of neurotransmitter synthesis genes (electronic supplementary material, table S1) yielded expression patterns for at least one diagnostic enzyme per pathway (figure 4; electronic supplementary material, figure S1a). Notably, whereas all genes showed different numbers of labelled cells, these cells were distributed in a similar pattern along the AP axis. All genes examined labelled cells with a higher density in the anterior and more sparsely spaced distribution in the rest of the animal. This pattern mirrored the neural anatomy of H. miamia inferred by immunostaining and gad-1 expression (figure 2).
The expression of markers of different neurotransmitters in the region of the anterior condensation could reflect three potential hypotheses. First, these markers might label distinct cell types that are present throughout the anterior condensation with no clear organization. Second, these markers might label distinct cell types that are localized to different regions of the anterior condensation. Finally, these markers may be expressed in the same cells, reflecting the presence of neurons with multiple molecular functionalities (i.e. cells that signal via more than one neurotransmitter). We used the layered structure of gad-1+ cells as a framework for studying the spatial organization of cells expressing the other neurotransmitter genes.
Cells expressing tyrosine hydroxylase (th) and tryptophan hydroxylase-1 (tph-1) differed in spatial organization from gad1+ cells, labelling cells that were restricted to Layer I (figure 5). There was negligible co-expression of these two markers with gad-1, suggesting the presence of at least three different neural populations based on the neurotransmitter synthesis genes that are spatially restricted relative to each other (figure 5).
Double-FISH of gad-1 with acetylcholinesterase-1 (ache-1), dopamine beta hydroxylase like-1 (dbhl-1), histidine decarboxylase (hdc) and prohormone convertase (pc2), a previously studied neural gene in H. miamia, showed that cells expressing these markers were present in Layer I and Layer II, but absent from the commissure, pharynx and oral nerve ring. Strikingly, whereas many cells expressed only these markers, nearly all of the gad-1+ cells were double positives (figure 5), suggesting that putative gabaergic cells may also have cholinergic, adrenergic, histaminergic and peptidergic capacities in H. miamia. Further, ache-1 and dbhl-1 showed complete co-expression with pc2 (electronic supplementary material, figure S3), indicating that the majority of neurons in H. miamia are peptidergic, cholinergic and adrenergic, with a subset of these having gabaergic and histaminergic functionalities as well.
(e). Hofstenia miamia shows robust nervous system regeneration
With a clearer understanding of neural structures and cell types within H. miamia, we sought to determine the spatiotemporal nature of nervous system regeneration. Previous work has shown that H. miamia is capable of robust, whole-body regeneration [27,53]. Because regenerated worms show restoration of behaviours and can live and reproduce for many years following amputation, it is presumed that all neural cell types and structures return during this process. We therefore assessed if and when neural cell types and structures identified in this study are regenerated.
We used the expression of gad-1 across a regenerative time course to determine the timeline for regeneration of major neural structures (figure 6). Animals were amputated transversely across the middle stripe, yielding head and tail fragments. By 9 h post amputation (hpa) and 15 hpa, there was no concentrated gad-1 expression detectable at the wound site of regenerating tail fragments. Based on morphology and previous work [27], we found that both head and tail fragments had closed their wounds along the amputation site by 2 days post amputation (dpa). By 3 dpa, localized gad-1 expression was detectable in the anterior of the regenerating tail fragments, indicative of newly differentiated gad-1+ neural cells. gad-1 expression was expanded by 5 dpa and by 8 dpa, with neural structures including the ventral lobe-like structures formed by Layer II neurons and the dorsal commissure observable in the anterior of regenerating tail fragments. Thus, within 8 days, regenerating tail fragments recapitulated previously missing gad-1+ cells and structures and regained the ability to locomote (figure 6a). The timing of neural regeneration in H. miamia appears to be speedier than in another acoel, Symsagittifera roscoffensis, which regrows its head, brain and sensory organs within three to four weeks of decapitation [20,43,54]. Additionally, cells expressing other neural markers such as dbhl-1, TrpC-1 and pc2 also regenerated robustly (electronic supplementary material, figure S4). These findings, together with the return of normal movement, feeding, and reproductive behaviours seen in regenerated worms, suggest that H. miamia probably regenerates most, if not all, neural cell types.
In our studies of neural gene expression, the AP span of the anterior condensation appeared to scale in proportion to body length. To determine when the original ratio of anterior condensation span to body length is restored during regeneration, we measured the length of the anterior condensation, as labelled by gad-1, along the AP axis within regenerating fragments, relative to the body length of the entire fragment (figure 6b, electronic supplementary material, table S3). The anterior condensation length occupied a consistent proportion of the body length in intact animals, averaging to 26%. In 3 dpa regenerating tail fragments, when gad-1 expression is first detectable in the anterior, it only occupied 8% of the length of the regenerating fragment. gad-1 expression in regenerating tail fragments expanded and stabilized by 17 dpa, matching the 26% proportion seen in intact animals. In regenerating head fragments, the pre-existing anterior condensation occupied an outsized portion (51%) of the head fragment immediately after amputation (0 hpa). However, by 5 dpa, the size of the anterior condensation was reduced in regenerating head fragments to 26%. Thus, the anterior condensation becomes correctly proportioned to the size of the worm early upon amputation in regenerating head fragments (5 dpa) and later in tail fragments (17 dpa).
4. Discussion
We investigated neural anatomy and neurotransmitter synthesis pathway genes in the acoel H. miamia, an early-diverging lineage within acoels [39,55]. In addition to a full complement of neurotransmitter synthesis enzymes encoded in the genome, we found a nerve net and an anterior condensation containing neurite bundles external to body wall musculature and a ring commissure and ventral lobe-like structures internal to the body wall musculature, which are features that had previously only been observed within in-group Crucimusculata acoels [19,22,36,40,50,55]. We hypothesize that these are putatively ancestral features of the acoel nervous system. However, studies comparing the mechanisms by which these structures develop and regenerate are needed to assess this proposed homology.
In addition to structures shared with other acoels, the H. miamia nervous system also contains unique features. Notably, we did not detect nerve cords in H. miamia, which could reflect the ancestral state among acoels. This supports the idea of independent evolution of nerve cords in xenacoelomorphs, which was suggested by recent work [37]. The anterior condensation of H. miamia exhibits a layered structure, which has not been described in other acoels. The reticulating neurite bundles in Layer I (outer layer) are reminiscent of structures observed in the Symsagittifera roscoffensis (Crucimusculata) brain [36,38,40,43,50,56,57], but higher-resolution studies are needed to assess if those neurite bundles also surround clustered nuclei with a putative sensory cell in the centre as they do in H. miamia. Furthermore, both layers of the H. miamia anterior condensation, excluding the ventral midline in Layer II, occupy the full span of the DV axis of the animal. This is in contrast with members of Crucimusculata, where this condensation (or brain) is located either centrally or dorsally when observed in transverse section [19,38,40]. Therefore, studies of how the anterior condensation is positioned in H. miamia could inform the evolution of mechanisms for localization of the central nervous system along the DV axis.
Our molecular characterization of neural cells in H. miamia defined distinct neuronal populations, but also revealed cells that have a putative capacity for functioning across multiple neurotransmitter families. For example, many cells expressed genes encoding enzymes for production of peptidergic, cholinergic and gabaergic signals (figure 5). Future studies will reveal whether this mRNA co-expression corresponds to co-existence, co-release and/or co-transmission of multiple neurotransmitters. The targets of these cells have yet to be identified, but this work can be facilitated via functional studies of the genes that encode neurotransmitter receptor proteins. H. miamia is an ideal research organism for functional studies of these questions, as it is amenable to robust and systemic RNAi.
Here, we provide an atlas for the regeneration of neural structures and cell types in H. miamia. This work will enable mechanistic studies of neural regeneration, including pathways that control the differentiation of stem cells into neural cells that integrate into a functional brain. Acoels represent a major but understudied phyletic lineage within the Bilateria, and therefore, the identification of transcriptional regulatory programs that enable the generation of diverse neuronal cell types during regeneration and development in H. miamia will inform our understanding of the evolution of nervous systems.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Lorenzo Ricci for guidance and help in generating antibodies and optimizing immunostaining. We would also like to thank Alyson Ramirez, Dr Lorenzo Ricci, Dr D. Marcela Bolanos, Amaneet Lochab, Dr Gonzalo Giribet, Dr Desmond Ramirez and Denise Li for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Ethics
This article does not present research with ethical considerations.
Data accessibility
The data and images are provided within the article and electronic supplementary material figures, tables and movies. Accession numbers for genes in this study are provided in electronic supplementary material, table S1.
Authors' contributions
R.E.H. and M.S. designed the study. R.E.H conducted the experiments and analyses and D.P. assisted. R.E.H. and M.S. wrote the manuscript.
Competing interests
We declare we do not have any competing interests.
Funding
M.S. was supported by the Searle Scholar Program and the Smith Family Foundation. R.E.H. was funded by the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University. D.P. was supported by a Grant-in-aid of Undergraduate Research from the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University. This manuscript has been published by a grant from the Wetmore Colles Fund.
References
- 1.Burkhardt P, Grønborg M, McDonald K, Sulur T, Wang Q, King N. 2014. Evolutionary insights into premetazoan functions of the neuronal protein Homer. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 2342–2355. ( 10.1093/molbev/msu178) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Burkhardt P. 2015. The origin and evolution of synaptic proteins—choanoflagellates lead the way. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 506–514. ( 10.1242/jeb.110247) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liebeskind BJ, Hofmann HA, Hillis DM, Zakon HH. 2017. Evolution of animal neural systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 377–398. ( 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-023048) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kelava I, Rentzsch F, Technau U. 2015. Evolution of eumetazoan nervous systems: insights from cnidarians. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20150065 ( 10.1098/rstb.2015.0065) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Budd GE. 2015. Early animal evolution and the origins of nervous systems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20150037 ( 10.1098/rstb.2015.0037) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ryan JF, Chiodin M. 2015. Where is my mind? How sponges and placozoans may have lost neural cell types. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20150059 ( 10.1098/rstb.2015.0059) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moroz LL, Kohn AB. 2016. Independent origins of neurons and synapses: insights from ctenophores. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150041 ( 10.1098/rstb.2015.0041) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.King N, Rokas A. 2017. Embracing uncertainty in reconstructing early animal evolution. Curr. Biol. 27, R1081–R1088. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.054) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dunn CW, Leys SP, Haddock SHD. 2015. The hidden biology of sponges and ctenophores. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 282–291. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Peterson KJ, Lyons JB, Nowak KS, Takacs CM, Wargo MJ, McPeek MA. 2004. Estimating metazoan divergence times with a molecular clock. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6536–6541. ( 10.1073/pnas.0401670101) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Edgecombe GD, Giribet G, Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Kristensen RM, Neves RC, Rouse GW, Worsaae K, Sørensen MV. 2011. Higher-level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions. Org. Divers. Evol. 11, 151–172. ( 10.1007/s13127-011-0044-4) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cannon JT, Vellutini BC, Smith J, Ronquist F, Jondelius U, Hejnol A. 2016. Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to Nephrozoa. Nature 530, 89–93. ( 10.1038/nature16520) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lowe CJ, Wu M, Salic A, Evans L, Lander E, Stange-Thomann N, Gruber CE, Gerhart J, Kirschner M. 2003. Anteroposterior patterning in hemichordates and the origins of the chordate nervous system. Cell 113, 853–865. ( 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00469-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Martindale MQ. 2005. The evolution of metazoan axial properties. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 917–927. ( 10.1038/nrg1725) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arendt D, Denes AS, Jekely G, Tessmar-Raible K. 2008. The evolution of nervous system centralization. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 263, 1523–1528. ( 10.1098/rstb.2007.2242) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Arendt D, Tosches MA, Marlow H. 2015. From nerve net to nerve ring, nerve cord and brain – evolution of the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 61–72. ( 10.1038/nrn.2015.15) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schmidt-Rhaesa A. 2007. The evolution of organ systems. New York: NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Martínez P, Hartenstein V, Sprecher SG. 2017. Xenacoelomorpha nervous systems. Oxford research encyclopedia of neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Achatz JG, Martinez P. 2012. The nervous system of Isodiametra pulchra (Acoela) with a discussion on the neuroanatomy of the Xenacoelomorpha and its evolutionary implications. Front. Zool. 9, 27 ( 10.1186/1742-9994-9-27) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bery A, Martínez P. 2011. Acetylcholinesterase activity in the developing and regenerating nervous system of the acoel Symsagittifera roscoffensis. Acta Zool. 92, 383–392. ( 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2010.00472.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Raikova OI, Reuter M, Jondelius U, Gustafsson MKS. 2000. An immunocytochemical and ultrastructural study of the nervous and muscular systems of Xenoturbella westbladi (Bilateria inc. sed.). Zoomorphology 120, 107–118. ( 10.1007/s004350000028) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dittmann IL, Zauchner T, Nevard LM, Telford MJ, Egger B. 2018. SALMFamide2 and serotonin immunoreactivity in the nervous system of some acoels (Xenacoelomorpha). J. Morphol. 279, 589–597. ( 10.1002/jmor.20794) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Raikova OI, Reuter M, Gustafsson MKS, Maule AG, Halton DW, Jondelius U. 2004. Basiepidermal nervous system in Nemertoderma westbladi (Nemertodermatida): GYIRFamide immunoreactivity. Zoology 107, 75–86. ( 10.1016/j.zool.2003.12.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bauknecht P, Jekely G. 2017. Ancient coexistence of norepinephrine, tyramine, and octopamine signaling in bilaterians. BMC Biol. 15, 6 ( 10.1186/s12915-016-0341-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Egger B, et al. 2009. To be or not to be a flatworm: the acoel controversy. PLoS ONE 4, e5502 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0005502) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hejnol A, et al. 2009. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 4261–4270. ( 10.1098/rspb.2009.0896) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Srivastava M, Mazza-Curll KL, Van Wolfswinkel JC, Reddien PW.. 2014. Whole-body acoel regeneration is controlled by Wnt and Bmp-Admp signaling. Curr. Biol. 24, 1107–1113. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.042) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Holland ND. 2016. Nervous systems and scenarios for the invertebrate-to-vertebrate transition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150047 ( 10.1098/rstb.2015.0047) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wolff GH, Strausfeld NJ. 2016. Genealogical correspondence of a forebrain centre implies an executive brain in the protostome–deuterostome bilaterian ancestor. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150055 ( 10.1098/rstb.2015.0055) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wanninger A. 2015. Evolutionary developmental biology of invertebrates 1: introduction, Non-bilateria, acoelomorpha, xenoturbellida, chaetognatha. Vienna, Austria: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Copley RR, Moroz LL, Nakano H, Poustka AJ, Wallberg A, Peterson KJ, Telford MJ. 2011. Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature 470, 255–258. ( 10.1038/nature09676) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Philippe H, et al. 2019. Mitigating Anticipated Effects of Systematic Errors Supports Sister-Group Relationship between Xenacoelomorpha and Ambulacraria. Curr. Biol. 29, 1818–1826. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Raikova OI, Meyer-Wachsmuth I, Jondelius U. 2016. The plastic nervous system of Nemertodermatida. Org. Divers. Evol. 16, 85–104. ( 10.1007/s13127-015-0248-0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Raikova OI, Reuter M, Gustafsson MKS, Maule AG, Halton DW, Jondelius U. 2004. Evolution of the nervous system in Paraphanostoma (Acoela). Zool. Scr. 33, 71–88. ( 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2004.00137.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hejnol A, Martindale MQ. 2008. Acoel development indicates the independent evolution of the bilaterian mouth and anus. Nature 456, 382–386. ( 10.1038/nature07309) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Semmler H, Chiodin M, Bailly X, Martinez P, Wanninger A. 2010. Steps towards a centralized nervous system in basal bilaterians: insights from neurogenesis of the acoel Symsagittifera roscoffensis. Dev. Growth Differ. 52, 701–713. ( 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01207.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Martín-Durán JM, Pang K, Børve A, Lê HS, Furu A, Cannon JT, Jondelius U, Hejnol A. 2017. Convergent evolution of bilaterian nerve cords. Nature 553, 45–50. ( 10.1038/nature25030) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Perea-Atienza E, Gavilan B, Chiodin M, Abril JF, Hoff KJ, Poustka AJ, Martinez P. 2015. The nervous system of Xenacoelomorpha: a genomic perspective. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 618–628. ( 10.1242/jeb.110379) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jondelius U, Wallberg A, Hooge M, Raikova OI. 2011. How the worm got its pharynx: phylogeny, classification and Bayesian assessment of character evolution in Acoela. Syst. Biol. 60, 845–871. ( 10.1093/sysbio/syr073) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gavilan B, Perea-Atienza E, Martinez P. 2015. Xenacoelomorpha: a case of independent nervous system centralization? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150039 ( 10.1098/rstb.2015.0039) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hejnol A, Pang K. 2016. Xenacoelomorpha's significance for understanding bilaterian evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 39, 48–54. ( 10.1016/j.gde.2016.05.019) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Reuter M, Raikova OI, Gustafsson MK. 1998. An endocrine brain? The pattern of FMRF-amide immunoreactivity in Acoela (Plathelminthes). Tissue Cell 30, 57–63. ( 10.1016/S0040-8166(98)80006-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sprecher SG, Bernardo-Garcia FJ, van Giesen L, Hartenstein V, Reichert H, Neves R, Bailly X, Martinez P, Brauchle M.. 2015. Functional brain regeneration in the acoel worm Symsagittifera roscoffensis. Biol. Open 4, 1688–1695. ( 10.1242/bio.014266) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gehrke AR, et al. 2019. Acoel genome reveals the regulatory landscape of whole-body regeneration. Science 363, eaau6173 ( 10.1126/science.aau6173) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Steinbock O. 1966. Die Hofsteniiden (Turbellaria Acoela). Grundsatzliches zur Evolution der Turbellarien. Zeitschrift fur Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 4, 58–195. ( 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1966.tb00494.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Corrêa DD. 1960. Two New Marine Turbellaria from Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. 10, 208–216. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780. ( 10.1093/molbev/mst010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540–552. ( 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bery A, Cardona A, Martinez P, Hartenstein V. 2010. Structure of the central nervous system of a juvenile acoel, Symsagittifera roscoffensis. Dev. Genes Evol. 220, 61–76. ( 10.1007/s00427-010-0328-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Martinez P, Sprecher S. 2020. Of Circuits and Brains: The Origin and Diversification of Neural Architectures. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 82 ( 10.3389/fevo.2020.00082) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Smith JPS, Tyler S. 1986. Frontal organs in the Acoelomorpha: ultrastructure and phylogenetic significance. Hydrobiologia 132, 71–78. ( 10.1007/BF00046231) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Steinbock O. 1967. Regenerationsversuche mit Hofstenia giselae Steinb. (Turbellaria acoela). W. Roux’ Archiv f. Entwicklungsmechanik 158, 394–458. ( 10.1007/BF01380539) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bailly X, et al. 2014. The chimerical and multifaceted marine acoel Symsagittifera roscoffensis: from photosymbiosis to brain regeneration. Front. Microbiol. 5, 498 ( 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00498) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Achatz JG, Hooge M, Wallberg A, Jondelius U, Tyler S. 2010. Systematic revision of acoels with 9 + 0 sperm ultrastructure (Convolutida) and the influence of sexual conflict on morphology. J. Zoolog. Syst. Evol. Res. 48, 9–32. ( 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2009.00555.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Reuter M, Raikova OI, Jondelius U, Gustafsson MKS, Maule AG, Halton DW. 2001. Organisation of the nervous system in the Acoela: an immunocytochemical study. Tissue Cell 33, 119–128. ( 10.1054/tice.2000.0134) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Perea-Atienza E, Sprecher SG, Martínez P. 2018. Characterization of the bHLH family of transcriptional regulators in the acoel S. roscoffensis and their putative role in neurogenesis. Evodevo 9, 8 ( 10.1186/s13227-018-0097-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data and images are provided within the article and electronic supplementary material figures, tables and movies. Accession numbers for genes in this study are provided in electronic supplementary material, table S1.