Table 3.
Target | PDB ID | Number of decoys | PIZSA ranka | CIPS rankb |
---|---|---|---|---|
T29 | 2VDU | 2016 | 78.87 | 93.33 |
T30 | 2REX | 1119 | 96.69 | 96.13 |
T32 | 3BX1 | 599 | 99.67 | 45.74 |
T35 | 2W5F | 499 | 100.00 | 23.25 |
T36 | 2W5F | 309 | 100.00 | 3.24 |
T37 | 2W83 | 1495 | 99.93 | 76.86 |
T38 | 3FM8 | 888 | 96.62 | 80.47 |
T39 | 3FM8 | 1386 | 98.27 | 82.14 |
T40 | 3E8L | 2144 | 84.79 | 61.42 |
T41 | 2WPT | 1180 | 80.76 | 28.83 |
T46 | 3Q87 | 1640 | 81.89 | 85.17 |
T47 | 3U43 | 1051 | 85.44 | 96.48 |
T50 | 3R2X | 1448 | 81.35 | 89.94 |
T53 | 4JW2 | 1400 | 85.00 | 94.71 |
T54 | 4JW3 | 1398 | 82.98 | 48.79 |
and
% decoys that score worse than the native.