Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 4;36(12):3739–3748. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa207

Table 3.

Rank-ordering of the native complexes for targets in the CAPRI Score_set

Target PDB ID Number of decoys PIZSA ranka CIPS rankb
T29 2VDU 2016 78.87 93.33
T30 2REX 1119 96.69 96.13
T32 3BX1 599 99.67 45.74
T35 2W5F 499 100.00 23.25
T36 2W5F 309 100.00 3.24
T37 2W83 1495 99.93 76.86
T38 3FM8 888 96.62 80.47
T39 3FM8 1386 98.27 82.14
T40 3E8L 2144 84.79 61.42
T41 2WPT 1180 80.76 28.83
T46 3Q87 1640 81.89 85.17
T47 3U43 1051 85.44 96.48
T50 3R2X 1448 81.35 89.94
T53 4JW2 1400 85.00 94.71
T54 4JW3 1398 82.98 48.79
a

and

b -

% decoys that score worse than the native.