ABSTRACT
Substance use disorder is a significant health concern. Hospitalists manage patient with various forms of substance use disorder on a daily basis. In this review, we have tried to synthesize evidence together to give a brief, yet succinct, review of commonly encounters disorders; alcohol intoxication and withdrawal, opioid intoxication and withdrawal, cocaine intoxication and methamphetamine intoxication. We describe clinical features, diagnosis and management, which would serve as a great resource for hospitalist when managing these complicated patients.
KEYWORDS: Alcohol use disorder, alcohol withdrawal, cocaine, methamphetamines
1. Introduction
Substance use disorder is reckoned as an emerging national health concern [1]. It is expected that about 5.7 million older adults will have a substance abuse disorder by 2020 [2]. Substance abuse is often accompanied by non-adherence to medical therapy. This can lead to exacerbation of medical comorbidities which in turn lead to high readmission rates requiring a tremendous amount of hospital resources [3]. Given the magnitude of frequency and acuity of hospitalizations involving substance use, it is imperative that identification of the substance used and management of the patient’s condition not be delayed as this pathology can be life-threatening. Four of the substances of abuse that result in many substance use-related hospitalizations include alcohol, opioids, cocaine and methamphetamine. The aim of this article is to introduce hospitalist providers to each of these substances as they relate to the identification of intoxication and management of acute overdose and withdrawal symptoms.
2. Alcohol use disorder
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a substantial public health constraint. AUD results in approximately 2.5 million deaths in the USA every year. Alcohol consumption is the third leading preventable cause of death in the USA [4]. Symptoms of alcohol use disorder include increased tolerance, withdrawal symptoms or drinking to prevent withdrawal, consumption over longer periods of time, persistent desire or inability to cut down, foregoing other important interests to consume and continued drinking despite known current harm [5]. Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) also causes a huge toll on the health care system of USA. Approximately 4 million people are affected by alcohol withdrawal per year, which can develop either when regular consumption is reduced or stopped altogether [6].
2.1. Alcohol intoxication
2.1.1. Clinical features
Health care professionals working in the hospital setting very frequently encounter alcohol intoxication so it is imperative that they are familiar with its signs and symptoms. Symptoms vary depending on tolerance to alcohol and the blood alcohol level, which is affected by the weight of the individual and type of beverage (percentage of alcohol) consumed. Symptoms range from impairment of simple tasks, to death at toxic levels of ingestion. Slurred speech, nausea, vomiting, lack of coordination, impaired judgment, mood and personality changes, hypothermia, somnolence, respiratory depression are few of the important clinical features seen during intoxication [7].
2.1.2. Diagnosis
Clinical presentation consistent with alcohol intoxication and a positive blood alcohol level is sufficient for diagnosis. In alcohol intoxication, calculation of the serum osmolality shows an osmolal gap which can aid in clinical diagnosis if a blood alcohol level is unavailable [8]. Clinical features of intoxication are similar to other important conditions known to cause altered sensorium; hence reasonable effort should be made to rule these out. Differential diagnosis is presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Substance abuse intoxication of other alcohols-methanol/isopropyl alcohol cocaine, amphetamine, cannabis, opiates Metabolic Electrolyte abnormality (hypo or hypernatremia) Hypoglycemia Hepatic encephalopathy Hypertensive encephalopathy Uremia Diabetic ketoacidosis Hyperosmolar non-ketotic coma Infections Sepsis Meningitis Encephalitis Trauma Subarachnoid hemorrhage Subdural hematoma Neurologic Post ictal state Cerebrovascular accident (ischemic or hemorrhagic) Alcohol withdrawal |
2.1.3. Management
Often times, the initial encounter of an acutely intoxicated person is in the emergency department. The patient should be assessed for adequate airway, breathing and circulation, and intravenous fluids should be initiated. Concurrently a ‘banana bag’ (dextrose, thiamine, folic acid, multivitamin) should be administered. Once the patient is stabilized, he/she may be admitted to the hospital for further observation if appropriate. Alcohol withdrawal severity scale (PAWSS) predicts the severity of withdrawal and helps in determining the level of care needed by the patient [9]. As an inpatient, patients are usually managed symptomatically with intravenous fluids, anti-emetics as needed, thiamine, folic acid, multivitamins and use of restraints in agitated patients. Monitoring of the effects of alcohol on non-neurological organ systems is also an important task of the hospitalist. Attention should be paid to liver function tests (LFTs), electrolytes and blood glucose levels if patient is not eating well. Effort should be made to avoid letting a severely intoxicated patient to leave the hospital until their mentation improves as the patient is at high risk of self-harm in their altered state and physicians could be held responsible in case of harm to others or self- [8]. It is reasonable to put patients on a 72-h hold until the improvement of mentation. Intoxicated patients who have AUD have a high potential to undergo acute alcohol withdrawal as their blood alcohol level (BAL) decreases in the setting of abstinence. Severe alcohol withdrawal in the form of delirium tremens (DTs) could be life threatening and requires emergent treatment [10].
2.2. Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome (AWS)
AWS is defined as cessation of alcohol or reduction in alcohol consumption that has been heavy and prolonged which is associated with two or more of the following; insomnia, nausea/vomiting, autonomic hyperactivity, tremors, agitation (psychomotor), transient visual, tactile or auditory hallucination, anxiety or generalized tonic-clonic seizures [11].
2.2.1. Clinical features
Symptoms vary depending upon the time since cessation. Within 6–12 h relatively minor symptoms like diaphoresis, nausea/vomiting, tachycardia, tachypnea, tremors may appear. From 12 to 24 hours, visual, tactile or auditory hallucinations may develop. During these hallucinations, the sensorium is clear, and this quality differentiates these hallucinations from DTs. Within 24–48 h generalized tonic-clonic withdrawal seizures may manifest. From 48 to 72 h, DTs can develop. DTs defining characteristics are hallucinations associated with disorientation and agitation [12].
2.2.2. Diagnosis
A comprehensive history, clinical exam and temporal relationship of symptom onset with alcohol cessation or reduction in alcohol consumption are important. No specific laboratory investigation is necessary to make this diagnosis. It is important to make sure there is no other medical or psychiatric cause for the symptoms. It is not uncommon for patients with AWS to not provide information regarding their alcohol use history. By the time patient presents, BAL may be undetectable. Laboratory tests could be obtained which help in confirming alcohol use in those you suspect alcohol withdrawal. These tests have variable sensitivity and specificity and have to be interpreted with caution. Three evidence-based test results that suggest recent alcohol use are elevated Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (blood), AST:ALT ratio>2 (blood) and elevated ethyl glucuronide (EtG)(urine) [13].
2.2.3. Management
Management begins with symptomatic care. Patients should be rehydrated, and nutritional support should be provided. Patientswho are dependent on alcohol are often times malnourished, hence multivitamin, thiamine and folic acid are administered. Thiamine should be administered before administration glucose-containing fluids in order to prevent acute onset or worsening of preexisting Wernicke encephalopathy. Severe electrolyte abnormalities that are often found in alcohol withdrawal should be treated to prevent cardiac arrhythmias [14].
Patients with alcohol withdrawal should be assessed periodically by the Revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA-Ar) protocol [15]. In most of the hospitals, this protocol is nursing driven. Benzodiazepines are the first-line agent for withdrawal symptoms [10]. They significantly reduce the risk of seizure within first 2 days. Benzodiazepines are either used as symptom triggered therapy (STT) or fixed scheduled doses (FSD). In STT, benzodiazepine medications are administered per symptom-based CIWA-Ar protocol. This can not be used for non-verbal patients. Also, this approach is not considered safe for patients with history of alcohol withdrawal seizures. In FSD, the benzodiazepine is administered at scheduled intervals regardless of symptoms and then tapered. Both approaches are equally effective [16]. Various FDS dosing protocols exist.
The type of benzodiazepine used depends upon the age of patient and presence of liver disease or renal dysfunction. Lorazepam remains the most common benzodiazepine used for withdrawal because of its short half-life and lack of active metabolites [17]. Oxazepam is also short acting with no active metabolite, whereas diazepam and chlordiazepoxide are long-acting benzodiazepines and have long-acting metabolites [14].
Benzodiazepine sparing treatment with gabapentin has also been effective for mild alcohol withdrawal with no history of seizures. Gabapentin inhibits calcium channels and amplifies GABA synthesis. Gabapentin in alcohol withdrawal is used with a tapering protocol or fixed dosing [18]. A complete description of other drug treatments for alcohol withdrawal is out of scope of this review. Table 2 describes the dosing schedule for benzodiazepines and Gabapentin.
Table 2.
Symptoms triggered dosing of lorazepam (Intravenous or Oral) [14] | *Gabapentin dosing schedule [18, 19] | |
CIWA-Ar Score | Lorazepam dose | 300-400 TID for 3days, then 400 BID on day 4. |
0-7 | No medication required | |
8-10 | 1-2mg | |
11-15 | 2-3mg | |
16-19 | 3-4mg | |
20 or above consider transferring the patient to ICU | ||
*Gabapentin has renal excretion requiring dose adjustment in renal failure |
3. Opioids
3.1. Epidemiology
Opioids are a class of drugs used in a medical setting to treat acute and chronic pain. They include alkaloids from poppy seeds (codeine and morphine), semisynthetic opioids (oxycodone, hydromorphone and oxymorphone), synthetic phenylpiperidines (meperidine and fentanyl) and synthetic pseudopiperidines (methadone). It is estimated that up to 8 million Americans use opioid medications for chronic pain [20]. Lifetime self-reported misuse of opioid analgesics is 14% in persons 12 years and over [21]. These statistics help elucidate the magnitude of the current opioid crisis we are facing. Studies show that the opioid crisis has worsened over the past several decades, with mortality having quadrupled between 2000 and 2014 in opioid driven hospitalizations [22]. Most opioid-related hospitalizations are a direct result of opioid use such as intoxication, and others due to resulting traumatic injuries, injection site infections, and endocarditis. Unfortunately, these patients have been shown to be less compliant with follow up recommendations, resulting in recurrent ER visits and hospitalizations [3].
3.2. Types of opioids and their mechanism of action
The opioid receptors include μ, κ, δ subtypes. The effects of opioids are mostly a result of their actions on the μ opioid receptors. The role of κ and δ is not well defined. μ receptor stimulation cause euphoria and a sense of well-being. The clinically desired analgesia and cough suppressive effects of opioid medications, as well as the side effects of constipation, respiratory depression, tolerance and dependence are a result of opioid interaction with the μ receptor [23–25]. There are many subtypes of μ receptors and all μ opioids bind to all μ subtypes. The varying effects of different opioids result from their ability to activate receptor subtypes to a different degree [25]. Additional adverse effects of opioid medications may include nausea, vomiting, sedation, myoclonus or pruritus. The elderly population are at elevated risk for falls and delirium, however, withholding opioids for elderly patients in pain may also increase the risk of delirium [26].
The most commonly used opioids, which vary in potency, include heroin, morphine, codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone, methadone, tramadol, fentanyl, buprenorphine. Morphine and heroin are equivalent in terms of potency as heroin is converted to morphine and monoacetylmorphine during metabolization. Codeine, hydrocodone and tramadol are considered the ‘weak’ opioids among the above. These differ from ‘strong’ opioids by a dose limit which results from the accumulation of side effects [26]. Codeine is a prodrug that is converted to morphine. Hydrocodone is a prodrug that is converted to dihydromorphine. Oxycodone has active metabolites which contributes to its euphoria thereby increasing its abuse potential. Methadone is a long-acting opioid. Tramadol is an opioid agonist that affects 5HT receptors in addition to opioid receptors. Buprenorphine is a partial opioid receptor agonist (activates receptors at a lower level) and is sometimes formulated with naloxone (a pure opioid antagonist) to decrease its abuse risk [26,27] Heroin, methadone, and oxycodone are highly reinforcing and the most abused opioid types.
3.3. Diagnosis
Diagnosis of opioid intoxication primarily includes the use of urine assays. In addition, there are tests available that utilize blood, saliva, sweat and hair. Interpretation of the test results can be complicated because most opioid urine immunoassays use morphine as the only calibrator to determine a positive result. As there are a variety of opioids available that differ in chemical structure, and metabolism may convert one to another, many opioids may escape detection. A prime example is oxycodone, where a 6-fold higher concentration is required to detect compared to other opioids. Fentanyl and buprenorphine require specific immunoassays as they are very distinct in structure. Assessing the accuracy of these urine tests is also difficult as they are used as the gold standard. In an urgent setting, these may be the only tests available and confirmatory testing may take over 24 h to obtain [28].
3.4. Intoxication/Poisoning
Symptoms of opioid intoxication include miosis, respiratory depression (usual cause of death) and depressed mental status. Management of acute opioid intoxication involves supportive measures and removal of offending agents such as transdermal patch. Vital signs should be frequently monitored including heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature. Patient should be treated for co-existing conditions if present such as infections and trauma. Patients should be evaluated for multidrug intoxications by ordering other drug levels such as aspirin and acetaminophen [24]. Naloxone should only be given in respiratory depression/arrest as it may induce dysphoria, severe pain or ventricular arrhythmias. 0.4 mg naloxone diluted with 10 ml normal saline can be given at a rate of 0.5 ml every 2 min to maintain a respiratory rate over 8 respirations per minute. An alert mental status should not be used as a gauge of effectiveness and sedation should be tolerated. An intravenous infusion of naloxone may be necessary due to the short duration of action of naloxone once the effective dose is established. The infusion rate should be two-thirds of this dose every hour. A bolus should be available as needed of half the effective dose every 15 min. Delirium should be treated as usual with treatment of underlying contributory factors such as infections, metabolic abnormalities, medications and volume status. Haloperidol may be used if appropriate. A patient with opioid intoxication should preemptively be started on a bowel regimen. Nausea and vomiting should be treated symptomatically as usual. Pruritus can be treated with antihistamines [26].
Methadone causes dose-related QT prolongation which can result in torsades de pointes. This is treated with intravenous magnesium [27]. Tramadol and meperidine can cause seizures. Meperidine can cause serotonin syndrome [24].
3.5. Withdrawal
Cessation or reduced dose of opioids may result in withdrawal symptoms such as nausea, diarrhea, piloerection, diaphoresis, myalgias, arthralgias, restlessness, mydriasis, rhinorrhea, lacrimation, fever, hypotension or tachycardia. The severity of withdrawal symptoms depends on the type of opioid being used, dose, route of use and duration of use. Withdrawal from heroin may start at 4–6 h following last use, while withdrawal from methadone may not start until 36 h after last dose. Withdrawal from heroin peaks at 36 h and symptoms may last for up to 14 days. Treatment of withdrawal, as with intoxication, is supportive. There are objective tools available to determine the severity of withdrawal. These include the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale [29] and the Objective Opioid Withdrawal Scale. Use of opioid agonists/partial agonists such as methadone or buprenorphine and non-opioid medications such as alpha-adrenergic and antiemetic agents can alleviate the symptoms of opioid withdrawal. Methadone is usually initiated at a dose between 10 and 30 mg and may be slowly titrated up to 20 mg to 40 mg daily. Both methadone and buprenorphine may be continued for long-term management of opioid withdrawal. Clonidine may be used at doses between 0.1 and 0.2 mg every 6 h. Blood pressure should be monitored with use of clonidine [30]. Please refer to table 3 for summary of opioid use disorder.
Table 3.
Mechanism of action | Act on opioid receptors including μ, κ, δ. [23–25] |
Modes of use | Ingestion, inhalation, injection [32] |
Diagnosis | Urine, blood, saliva, sweat, hair assays [28] |
Symptoms of intoxication | Miosis, respiratory depression, depressed mental status [24] |
Symptoms of withdrawal | Nausea, diarrhea, piloerection, diaphoresis, myalgias, arthralgias, restlessness, mydriasis, rhinorrhea, lacrimation fever, hypotension and tachycardia [30] |
Treatment of intoxication | Supportive, opioid antagonist therapy when appropriate, management of comorbid conditions, intoxications [24,26] |
Treatment of withdrawal | Supportive, use of opioid agonists or clonidine if indicated [30] |
3.6. Use of opioids in pain management
There is good evidence of the efficacy of opioids in treatment of chronic cancer pain and acute pain. Physicians are often hesitant to prescribe opiates in the management of chronic noncancer pain due to the potential for abuse. Providers should be mindful of ‘pseudo-addiction’ which can present identical to addictive behavior except that it improves after adequate pain control is achieved. Patient-controlled analgesia pump is the appropriate way to treat acute post-surgical pain or sickle cell vasoocclusive crises. Prescription of opioids should be limited upon discharge for patients treated for a reversible cause. Opioids should only be prescribed for the duration of recovery to maintain function. Elderly patients should begin with half the dose one would normally use in an otherwise healthy adult due to increased potential for side effects. A lower dose at initiation is also recommended for patients with renal disease. Fentanyl is best tolerated by patients with liver disease, however, limited preparations limit its efficacy [26]. Patients should be started on a bowel regimen prophylactically on initiation of opioid therapy. If constipation symptoms persist, the use of antagonist therapy with lubiprostone or methylnaltrexone may be necessary [31].
3.7. Opioid rotation
Opioid rotation plays a vital role in inpatient care. Scenarios in which this becomes necessary include a new organ failure/dysfunction, side effects from a particular opioid, inability to tolerate previous route of administration, or incomplete pain relief from previous regimen. Unavailability of a specific opioid may necessitate opioid rotation as well such as with the recent shortages of injectable opioids. In the absence of the above indications, it is best to avoid changing a patient’s outpatient regimen. If the need arises to change to a different opioid, keeping incomplete cross-tolerance in mind, dose should be reduced by 25-50%. Follow up to evaluate analgesia and side effects should be 5–10 min after an intravenous test dose and 30–40 min after oral test dose [26].
4. Cocaine
4.1. Background
Cocaine is a powerful stimulant drug that is derived from the leaves of the Erythroxylum coca plant native to South America. Common street names of this drug include: Blow, Coke, Crack, Rock or Snow. Cocaine has also been combined with other psychoactive drugs that include opioids and stimulant amphetamines. Illicit cocaine is available in two forms: Cocaine salt and Cocaine base (crack, free base). Users can snort cocaine salt through the nose or rub it into their gums. Cocaine base can be heated to produce vapors that are inhaled into the lungs. The water-soluble form of cocaine can be injected intravenously as well. Cocaine’s effect occurs almost immediately and dissipates quickly in a few minutes to an hour. As per the results of a national survey on drug use and health in 2016, there were an estimated 1.9 million people aged 12 or older (corresponding to 0.7% of the population older than 12 years) who currently used cocaine. This estimate was similar to the estimates of cocaine users between 2007 and 2015 but lower than the estimates from 2002 to 2006 [33,34].
4.2. Mechanism of action
Cocaine affects the monoamine neurotransmitter activity in the nervous system by blocking reuptake or recycling of these molecules, thereby causing increased concentrations extracellularly. Increased dopamine activity in the neurons of the mesocorticolimbic system leads to the behavioral and abuse-related effects of cocaine [35,36]. By increasing norepinephrine concentrations in the synaptic junctions, cocaine stimulates the sympathetic nervous system causing vasoconstriction, tachycardia, mydriasis, and hyperthermia. By blocking sodium channels in neuronal cells, it can also produce a local anesthetic effect [34].
4.3. Clinical features
Cocaine use is associated with significant cardiovascular complications. It causes increased sympathomimetic activity and inhibits transient inward flux of sodium across the cell membrane during depolarization, increasing myocardial oxygen demand while simultaneously decreasing myocardial oxygen supply through vasoconstriction. In addition, it can lead to endothelial dysfunction and platelet aggregation. This leads to a significant increase in risk of acute myocardial infarction in otherwise low-risk patients [37]. With long-term use, it can also accelerate atherosclerosis. Cocaine can cause decrease in left ventricular function and lead to development of cardiomyopathy in the absence of myocardial ischemia. It can also lead to prolonged corrected QTc interval and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias [37]. Some studies have pointed toward sinus bradycardia in habitual cocaine users that possibly resulted from desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors [38] Although the clinical significance of resulting sinus bradycardia is unclear. Neurologic complications of cocaine use can include seizures, headaches, transient loss of consciousness, focal neurologic complications that include intracranial hemorrhage and infarcts [39]. Psychiatric complications include transient hallucinations, paranoia, suicidal ideation, aggression, agitation, stereotyped behavior, and anxiety [39,40]. Inhalation of crack cocaine can also lead to injury to the respiratory system. It can cause airway injury resulting in severe reactive airway disease. There have been reports of tracheal stenosis, pneumothorax, and pneumomediastinum. It can also exacerbate existing chronic lung diseases such as asthma [41]. ‘Crack lung’ has also been described in the literature to describe acute respiratory failure attributed to the use of crack cocaine and can include any combination of pulmonary hemorrhage, interstitial lung processes and pulmonary edema. In some reports, this syndrome was associated with eosinophilia indicating a possible immunologic mechanism [41–43]. Abuse of cocaine is associated with multiple gastrointestinal adverse effects as well. Multiple forms of intestinal disorders have been reported which include gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation, and ischemic colitis. Smuggling of cocaine by ingesting cocaine packets (‘body packing’) can lead to complications such as obstruction and perforation. If the wrapping deteriorates, release of cocaine can cause acute intoxication. In addition to damage to the gastrointestinal tract, cocaine use can also cause increased liver enzyme levels, the long-term significance of which is unclear [34]. Cocaine intoxication can lead to rhabdomyolysis that can lead to acute renal failure [34]. Other adverse effects of cocaine use include endocrine abnormalities, chronic rhinitis, erosion of dental enamel and nasal septum perforation [34].
4.4. Diagnosis
Diagnosis is generally made by testing urine specimens for cocaine metabolite, benzoylecgonine (BE), an inactive metabolite. Thin-layer chromatography (poor sensitivity) and enzyme-linked immunoassay technique are generally utilized as initial screening tools. Gas chromatography is the gold standard for detecting metabolites of cocaine. Cocaine metabolites can be detected for 5–6 days with gas chromatography with mass spectroscopy. Long-term use of cocaine can produce positive results for up to 10–22 days after cocaine use [44].
4.5. Management
Supportive treatment is recommended for cocaine intoxication-related complications as mentioned above. For acute agitation, benzodiazepines can be used. Haloperidol is not used as first-line as it can reduce the seizure threshold. For hyperthermic patients, aggressive cooling techniques can be used [45]. Please refer to table 4 for summary of cocaine use disorder.
Table 4.
Cocaine Common routes of administration Smoking Insufflation Intravenous injection Adverse effects Cardiac Myocardial ischemia Cardiomyopathy Prolonged QTc interval Arrhythmias Sinus bradycardia Pulmonary Reactive airway disease Tracheal stenosis Pneumothorax Pneumomediastinum Pulmonary edema ‘Crack lung’ Neurologic Seizures Transient loss of consciousness Stroke, ischemic and hemorrhagic Renal Rhabdomyolysis Acute renal failure Gastrointestinal Gastrointestinal bleeding Ischemic colitis Obstruction and perforation in ‘body packers’ Psychiatric Transient hallucinations Paranoia Aggression Agitation Stereotyped behavior Other Chronic rhinitis Erosion dental enamel Perforated nasal septum Management Supportive See Table 5for cocaine-induced acute coronary syndrome Withdrawal Rarely medically serious Depression Anxiety Inability to concentrate Increased appetite |
4.6. Management of cocaine-related acute coronary syndrome
American heart association guidelines recommend treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with history of cocaine use in the same manner as patient’s without cocaine use. It does recommend certain important exceptions in treatment of acute coronary syndrome, specifically in the acute intoxication phase. It is believed that because cocaine stimulates both alpha and beta-adrenergic receptors, beta-blocker usage can result in unopposed alpha-stimulation and worsen coronary spasm and should be avoided. In those patients, usage of benzodiazepines along with nitroglycerin can be useful in the management of hypertension and tachycardia. Above management is also applicable to patients with methamphetamine-induced acute coronary syndrome [46] (table 5).
Table 5.
|
4.7. Cocaine withdrawal
Cocaine withdrawal is rarely considered medically serious and should be treated based on symptoms. However, reported withdrawal symptoms of cocaine include depression, anxiety, trouble concentrating, irritability, fatigue, insomnia, increased appetite and rapid heart rate [47].
5. Methamphetamine
5.1. Background
Methamphetamine is a psychostimulant of the phenethylamine and amphetamine class of psychoactive drugs [48]. In the 1970s, methamphetamine was made using phenyl-2-propanone (‘P2P’) and methylamine. In 1980s, following P2P being classified as a scheduled substance, ephedrine, and pseudoephedrine became the main precursors to manufacturing methamphetamines. In the 2000s, restrictions placed on imports of pseudoephedrine and over-the-counter cold medicine containing pseudoephedrine did lead to a short-lived decrease in methamphetamine manufacturing. In the mid-2000s producers then shifted to using chemicals other than pseudoephedrine in methamphetamine production [49]. In 2016, an estimated 667,000 people aged 12 or older were current users of methamphetamine [33]. Methamphetamine is most commonly smoked although it can be injected, ingested, inhaled, or taken rectally as well [48].
5.2. Clinical features
Methamphetamine usage leads to arousal, decreased fatigue, tachycardia, hypertension, reduced appetite, behavioral disinhibition, and short-term improvement in cognitive function. At higher doses, psychosis can occur as well. Acute methamphetamine intoxication usually presents with tachycardia, hypertension, and altered mental status in the form of agitation and/or psychosis. Cardiovascular complications include ventricular fibrillation or acute cardiac failure. Acute coronary syndrome, acute aortic dissection, and sudden cardiac death can also occur due to methamphetamine-induced hypertension, coronary spasm, and arrhythmias. Prolonged corrected QTc is frequently observed in methamphetamine abusers. Intravenous use can be associated with bacterial endocarditis. Methamphetamine is also implicated as a cause of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chronic users are at an increased risk for the development of cardiomyopathy and the left ventricular dysfunction is generally more severe compared to other causes of cardiomyopathy [50]. Pulmonary complications include the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema sometimes leading to respiratory failure [51]. Seizures, ischemic as well as hemorrhagic strokes have been reported in methamphetamine users. Methamphetamine usage is also linked to cognitive impairment which can persist for multiple months after abstinence. Psychiatric adverse effects include depressed mood, anxiety and associated anhedonia, irritability, and inactivity. Psychosis can occur in methamphetamine abusers as well [52]. In addition to above, accidents, suicide, and homicide remain an important cause of mortality associated with methamphetamine use [53]. Rhabdomyolysis and dehydration can occur sometimes leading to acute renal failure. Gastrointestinal adverse effects include development of acute liver injury, mesenteric infarction, and ischemic colitis. There are also reports of acute pancreatitis. Dermatologic complications often arise from skin-picking that predisposes methamphetamine users to skin and soft tissue infections. In addition, poor hygiene and malnutrition that are often related to chronic substance abuse can lead to skin diseases and dental decay. Dental decay is also possibly accelerated by bruxism and xerostomia [54] [51].
5.3. Diagnosis
Methamphetamine can be detected in the urine for approximately 48 h after use. It can also be detected by hair analysis. A positive methamphetamine screen should be confirmed as false-positive results can sometimes occur. Examples of medications that can cause false-positive results include bupropion, phenothiazines, trazodone, labetalol, and ranitidine [53].
5.4. Management
When managing patients with suspected acute intoxication of methamphetamine, a clinician should have a high degree of suspicion for concurrent abuse of other substances as well. Treatment of acute intoxication is largely supportive. For oral ingestions, use gastric lavage or activated charcoal. For agitation and psychosis, benzodiazepines and antipsychotic agents such as haloperidol and olanzapine can be utilized. For hyperthermia, cooling measures may be required [53,55,56]. Management of Methamphetamine induced acute coronary syndrome is similar to management of cocaine-induced ACS noted previously in this review. Hypertension and tachycardia should be managed with medications other than beta-blockers. If malignant hypertension is present, sedation is generally recommended to assist with blood pressure control. Further investigations such as echocardiogram or coronary angiogram may be indicated based on the clinical picture [50]. Please refer to table 6 for summary of methamphetamine use disorder.
Table 6.
Methamphetamine Common routes of administration Ingestion Inhalation Insufflation Anal suppository Adverse effects General Hypertension Tachycardia Hyperthermia Cardiac Arrhythmias Acute heart failure Pulmonary Pulmonary edema Pulmonary hypertension Respiratory failure Neurologic Seizures Ischemic/Hemorrhagic strokes Cognitive impairment Renal Rhabdomyolysis Acute renal failure Gastrointestinal Acute liver failure Ischemic colitis Mesenteric infarction Dermatologic Skin and soft tissue infection Psychiatric Anhedonia Depressed mood Anxiety Psychosis Agitation Other Suicide Accidents Management Largely supportive Benzodiazepines and anti-psychotics as needed for controlling agitation and psychosis Avoid beta-blockers for hypertension, tachycardia or methamphetamine associated cardiac complications Withdrawal Depression Inability to concentrate Paranoia |
5.5. Methamphetamine withdrawal
Withdrawal from methamphetamine generally causes depression, somnolence, anxiety, inability to concentrate, increased appetite, and paranoia. Seizures can occur as well. Depression associated with methamphetamine withdrawal can be more prolonged and severe when compared to cocaine withdrawal. Treatment should be symptomatic [53].
6. Conclusion
Substance use disorder is commonly encountered in hospital medicine practice and complicates patient presentations. Prompt recognition and management are crucial. Once patients with a substance use disorder are medically stabilized, hospitalists should encourage patients to obtain comprehensive evaluation by an addiction specialist to assess the patient's mental health status, need for detoxification as well as constitute an effective treatment plan to prevent relapse and promote sobriety.
Funding Statement
Dr. Sinha has received grant funding from UCare Foundation.
Disclosure statement
The other authors report no competing interests.
References
- [1].Lehmann SW, Fingerhood M, Longo DL.. Substance-use disorders in later life. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(24):2351–2360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Yarnell S, li l, MacGrory B. Substance use disorders in later life: a review and synthesis of the literature of an emerging public health concern. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;28:226–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Nordeck CD, Welsh C, Schwartz RP, et al. Rehospitalization and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment entry among patients seen by a hospital SUD consultation-liaison service. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;186:23–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Liang J, Olsen RW.. Alcohol use disorders and current pharmacological therapies: the role of GABAA receptors. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2014;35(8):981–993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Hasin DS, O’Brien CP, Auriacombe M, et al. DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(8):834–851. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Kosten TR, O’Connor PG. Management of drug and alcohol withdrawal. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(18):1786–1795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Vonghia L, Leggio L, Ferrulli A, et al. Acute alcohol intoxication. Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19(8):561–567. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Yost DA. Acute care for alcohol intoxication. Be prepared to consider clinical dilemmas. Postgrad Med. 2002;112(6):14–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Maldonado JR, Sher Y, Ashouri JF, et al. The “Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale” (PAWSS): systematic literature review and pilot study of a new scale for the prediction of complicated alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Alcohol. 2014;48(4):375–390. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Mayo-Smith MF. Pharmacological management of alcohol withdrawal. A meta-analysis and evidence-based practice guideline. American Society of Addiction Medicine Working Group on Pharmacological Management of Alcohol Withdrawal. JAMA. 1997;278(2):144–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Schmidt KJ, Doshi MR, Holzhausen JM, et al. Treatment of severe alcohol withdrawal. Ann Pharmacother. 2016;50(5):389–401. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Bayard M, McIntyre J, Hill KR, et al. Alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(6):1443–1450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Jesse S, Bråthen G, Ferrara M, et al. Alcohol withdrawal syndrome: mechanisms, manifestations, and management. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135(1):4–16. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Gortney JS, Raub JN, Patel P, et al. Alcohol withdrawal syndrome in medical patients. Cleve Clin J Med. 2016;83(1):67–79. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Sullivan JT, Sykora K, Schneiderman J, et al. Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: the revised clinical institute withdrawal assessment for alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar). Br J Addict. 1989;84(11):1353–1357. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Skinner RT. Symptom-triggered vs. fixed-dosing management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Medsurg Nurs. 2014;23(5):307–15, 329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Weaver MF, Hoffman HJ, Johnson RE, et al. Alcohol withdrawal pharmacotherapy for inpatients with medical comorbidity. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2006;25(2):17–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Myrick H, Malcolm R, Randall PK, et al. A double-blind trial of gabapentin versus lorazepam in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33(9):1582–1588. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Maldonado JR. Novel algorithms for the prophylaxis and management of alcohol withdrawal syndromes-beyond benzodiazepines. Critical Care Clinics. 2017;33(3):559–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Jamison RN, Mao J. Opioid Analgesics. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(7):957–968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Connery HS. Medication-assisted treatment of opioid use disorder: review of the evidence and future directions. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 2015;23(2):63–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Song Z. Mortality quadrupled among opioid-driven hospitalizations, notably within lower-income and disabled white populations. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(12):2054–2061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Jones JD, Mogali S, Comer SD. Polydrug abuse: a review of opioid and benzodiazepine combination use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;125(1–2):8–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Maldonado JR. An approach to the patient with substance use and abuse. Med Clin North Am. 2010;94(6):1169–205, x–i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Pasternak GW. Preclinical pharmacology and opioid combinations. Pain Med. 2012;13(Suppl 1):S4–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Mann M, Chai E. Opioid essentials. Hospital Med Clin. 2014;3(4):567–581. [Google Scholar]
- [27].Bateman DN. Opioids. Medicine (Baltimore). 2012;40(3):141–143. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Milone MC. Laboratory testing for prescription opioids. J Med Toxicol. 2012;8(4):408–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Wesson DR, Ling W. The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS). J Psychoactive Drugs. 2003;35(2):253–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Donroe JH, Tetrault JM. Substance use, intoxication, and withdrawal in the critical care setting. Crit Care Clin. 2017;33(3):543–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Smith HS, Peppin JF. Toward a systematic approach to opioid rotation. J Pain Res. 2014;7:589–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Young AM, Havens JR, Leukefeld CG. Route of administration for illicit prescription opioids: a comparison of rural and urban drug users. Harm Reduct J. 2010;7(1):24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].SAMHSA . Key substance use and mental health Indicators in the USA: results from the 2016 national survey on drug use and health (HHS Publication No. SMA 17-5044, NSDUH Series H-52). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- [34].Warner EA. Cocaine abuse. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(3):226–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Howell LL, Kimmel HL. Monoamine transporters and psychostimulant addiction. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75(1):196–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Baik J-H. Dopamine Signaling in reward-related behaviors. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7:152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Maraj S, Figueredo VM, Lynn Morris D. Cocaine and the heart. Clin Cardiol. 2010;33(5):264–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Franklin SM, Thihalolipavan S, Fontaine JM. Sinus Bradycardia in habitual cocaine users. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(10):1611–1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Lowenstein DH, Massa SM, Rowbotham MC, et al. Acute neurologic and psychiatric complications associated with cocaine abuse. Am J Med. 1987;83(5):841–846. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Vorspan F, Brousse G, Bloch V, et al. Cocaine-induced psychotic symptoms in French cocaine addicts. Psychiatry Res. 2012;200(2–3):1074–1076. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Haim DY, Lippmann ML, Goldberg SK, et al. The pulmonary complications of crack cocaine. CHEST. 1995;107(1):233–240. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Forrester JM, Steele AW, Waldron JA, et al. Crack lung: an acute pulmonary syndrome with a spectrum of clinical and histopathologic findings. Amer Rev Respir Dis. 1990;142(2):462–467. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Ker DG, Lawrence WD, Selis JE, et al. Crack lung: pulmonary disease caused by cocaine abuse. Amer Rev Respir Dis. 1987;136(5):1250–1252. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Weiss RD, Gawin FH. Protracted elimination of cocaine metabolites in long-term high-dose cocaine abusers. Am J Med. 1988;85(6):879–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Zimmerman JL. Cocaine intoxication. Crit Care Clin. 2012;28(4):517–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(24):e139–e228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Cottler LB, Shillington AM, Compton WM, et al. Subjective reports of withdrawal among cocaine users: recommendations for DSM-IV. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993;33(2):97–104. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Courtney KE, Ray LA. Methamphetamine: an update on epidemiology, pharmacology, clinical phenomenology, and treatment literature. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;143:11–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Maxwell JC, Brecht M-L. Methamphetamine: here we go again? Addict Behav. 2011;36(12):1168–1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Paratz ED, Cunningham NJ, MacIsaac AI. The cardiac complications of methamphetamines. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25(4):325–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Vearrier D, Greenberg MI, Miller SN, et al. Methamphetamine: history, pathophysiology, adverse health effects, current trends, and hazards associated with the clandestine manufacture of methamphetamine. Disease-a-Month. 2012;58(2):38–89. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Cruickshank CC, Dyer KR. A review of the clinical pharmacology of methamphetamine. Addiction. 2009;104(7):1085–1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Winslow BT, Voorhees KI, Pehl KA. Methamphetamine abuse. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76(8):1169–1174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].De-Carolis C, Boyd GA, Mancinelli L, et al. Methamphetamine abuse and “meth mouth” in Europe. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(2):e205–10. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Shoptaw SJ, Kao U, Ling W. Treatment for amphetamine psychosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. Jan 21;(1):CD003026. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003026.. pub3 PubMed ID: PMC7004251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Glasner-Edwards S, Mooney LJ. Methamphetamine psychosis: epidemiology and management. CNS Drugs. 2014;28(12):1115–1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]