SUMMARY
The analysis of protein half-life and degradation dynamics has proven critically important to our understanding of a broad and diverse set of biological conditions ranging from cancer to neurodegeneration. Historically these protein turn over measures have been performed in cells by monitoring protein levels after “pulse” labeling of newly synthesized proteins and subsequent chase periods. Comparing the level of labeled protein remaining as a function of time to the initial level reveals the protein’s half-life. In this method we provide a detailed description of the work-flow required for the determination of protein turn-over rates on a whole proteome scale in vivo.
Our approach starts with the metabolic labeling of whole rodents by restricting all the nitrogen in their diet to exclusively nitrogen-15 in the form of spirulina algae. After near complete organismal labeling with nitrogen-15 the rodents are then switched to a normal nitrogen-14 rich diet for time periods of days to years. Tissues are harvested, the extracts are fractionated, and the proteins are digested to peptides. Peptides are separated by multi-dimensional liquid chromatography and analyzed by high resolution orbitrap mass spectrometry (MS). The nitrogen-15 containing proteins are then identified and measured by the bioinformatic proteome analysis tools Sequest, DTASelect2, and Census. Through these protein measures, our approach reveals in vivo protein decay rates proteome-wide.
Keywords: Proteomics, Mass Spectrometry, Protein Half-life, Protein Decay Dynamics, Stable Isotope Labeling of Mammals, Nitrogen-15, SILAC, SILAM, Extremely Long Lived Proteins
1. INTRODUCTION
To determine the rate of protein decay, new and old versions of each protein must be discernable and ideally both be measurable. Typically cells are initially “pulsed” with a traceable molecular label (such as methionine enriched with sulfer-35 atoms) which are incorporated into newly synthesized proteins and subsequently “chased” with a normal containing methionine (sulfer-32 fraction of 95.02%) (1,2). By comparing the initial amount of a specific labeled protein to that remaining as a function of a time, a measure of protein half-life can be obtained (3). These analysis can also provide key information on the possibility that different pools of the same protein exist and have dissimilar decay kinetics. Recently, proteomic technologies have been applied to gain insight into the analysis of protein turnover dynamics on a proteome-wide scale. By combining the yeast whole genome tap-tag gene library, translation inhibition with cyclohexamide, and epitope tag western blot analysis it was determined that on average the life time of a yeast protein is about 43 minutes (4). In cultured HeLa and C2C12 cells, “pulse-only” stable isotope labeling of cells in culture (SILAC) for several durations with time course mass spectrometry (MS) analysis showed average protein half-life in mouse and human cells <2 days (5). In mice, by using MS analysis to measure the rate by which isotopes are metabolically incorporated into proteins and modeling it has been suggested that on average proteins in brain tissue have a lifetime of 9.0 days, liver 3.0 days, and blood 3.5 days (6,7).
We have developed a straight-forward systematic approach to monitor protein decay dynamics on a global scale in the most relevant biological context, in vivo. Our approach has verified previously reported rapid degradation dynamics for nearly all proteins. Unexpected we also find a limited number of intracellular extremely long lived proteins (ELLPs) which reside in the nucleus and cytoplasm of post mitotic neurons (8,9). Our approach also confirmed the existence ELLPs in the myelin sheath and eye lens (10–12)). Application of our approach to proteinopathy disease mouse models (such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s disease) could provide new insight on pathogenic mechanisms by identifying disease specific long lived proteins.
2. MATERIALS
Buffers and solutions for MS analysis should be prepared with analytical chromatography grade solvents and for biochemical experiments we prepared buffers with ultra-pure water (Milli-Q® Water Purification Systems, 18-megohm-cm deionized water). Solutions should be stored at room temperature unless otherwise indicated. To minimize keratin contamination gloves should be worn during the preparation of all buffers and samples.
2.1. Nitrogen-15 or Nitrogen-14 spirulina rodent chow components
Nitrogen-15 enriched spirulina algae: Nitrogen-15 enriched (>94%) spirulina were purchased from Cambridge Isotopes (13), Cambridge, MA, USA or can be grown and prepared in house as previously described (14–16).
Rodent chow: Rodent chow has been prepared by mixing nitrogen-15 or nitrogen-14 spirulina with protein-free diet mixture powder (Harlan TD 93328) in a 1 to 3 ratio. Pellets were prepared by adding ultra-pure water to the power mixture and worked the mixture into dough shaped into cylinders. Individual ~2-cm discs we cut from the cylinders and dried at 60 ºC for 2–4 hours and then 35 ºC overnight on screen trays in an Excalibur food dehydrator (17). Alternatively, nitrogen-15 spirulina containing chow can be purchased pre-prepared from CIL / Harlan Laboratories Inc. with 22% protein / 65% carbohydrate (carbon, hydrogen, oxygen as CHO), 13% fat composition [see Note 1].
2.2. Representative protein fractionation components
Tissue homogenization buffer: 0.32 M sucrose, 4 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 1 mM MgCl2 and protease inhibitors (Sigma) [see Note 2]. 1 M Hepes, add 600mL water to a glass beaker, weigh and add 238.3 g of Hepes, add stir bar to dissolve on a stir plate. Determine pH and adjust with HCl or NaOH to pH 7.4 final. Transfer to a graduated cylinder and add water to 1L. Store at 4 °C. 1 M MgCl2, add 500mL water to a glass beaker, weigh and add 203.3 g of MgCl2 6H2O, add stir bar to dissolve on a stir plate. Transfer to a graduated cylinder and add water to 1L. To a 250mL glass beaker, a stir bar, add 50mL of water, 5 mL of 1 M Hepes (pH 7.4), 0.1 mL of 1M MgCl2, and 10.9 g of Sucrose. Transfer to a 100 mL graduated cylinder and add water to 100 mL (18).
Sucrose gradient buffers (0.85 M / 1.0 M / 1.2 M / 2.0 M): Weigh 28.9 g, 34.0 g, 40.9 g, 69.1 g and prepare 100 mL of buffer as described above except substitute the indicated amount of sucrose for each buffer.
2,2,2-trichloroacetic acid (TCA) buffer: prepare a 100% (wt / vol) TCA solution with water.
2.3. Protein digestion components
Urea protein denaturation buffer: Dissolve 0.395 g of solid Ammonium bicarbonate in 100mL of water to prepare 50 mM (AMBC) adjust to pH 7.5 as described above; aliquot and store at −20 °C. Add 0.240 g of urea to 320 ul of AMBC buffer to prepare 8 M solution [see Note 3].
ProteaseMAX surfactant buffer: Dissolve solid ProteaseMAX in 500ul of AMBC to prepare 0.2% solution or 100ul for 1% [see Note 4].
Reduction buffer: Dissolve solid Tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP) in AMBC to prepare 0.5 M solution [see Note 5].
Alkylation buffer: Dissolve solid Iodoacetamide in AMBC and prepare 1 M solution.
Trypsin buffer: Dissolve 20 ug vial of lyophilized trypsin (Promega) in 40 ul of buffer [see Note 6].
2.4. Liquid chromatography components
HPLC buffer A: Prepare HPLC buffer A with 95% water, 5% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid (vol / vol).
HPLC buffer B: Prepare HPLC buffer B with 20% water, 80% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid (vol / vol).
HPLC buffer C : Prepare HPLC buffer C with 500 mM ammonium acetate, 5% (vol / vol) acetonitrile and 0.1% (vol / vol) formic acid.
Make Kasil frit and prepare multidimensional protein identification (MudPIT) column by bomb packing strong cation exchange (SCX) / reversed phase resins as previously described (19–21).
2.5. Mass Spectrometer
Tune and calibrate electrospray high resolution orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific™ Orbitrap Velos Pro or Orbitrap Tribrid Fusion) per the manufacturer’s instructions with Pierce LTQ Velos ESI Positive Ion Calibration Solution [see Note 7].
2.7. Proteomic analysis software
IP2 (Integrated Proteomic Analysis environment is commercially available; http://integratedproteomics.com/).
RawExtractor (Spectra extraction tool is freely downloadable; http://fields.scripps.edu/researchtools.php).
Sequest / Prolucid (Protein database search algorithm is freely downloadable; http://fields.scripps.edu/researchtools.php).
DTASelect2 (protein dataset filtering tool is freely downloadable; http://fields.scripps.edu/researchtools.php).
Census (protein quantitation software is freely downloadable; http://fields.scripps.edu/researchtools.php).
3. METHODS
Perform all procedures at room temperature unless noted.
3.1. Metabolic labeling of whole rodents
Obtain two recently weaned female rats and allow to acclimate in the university approved animal facility for several days [see Note 8].
Replace standard rodent chow with nitrogen-15 containing spirulina chow and house for >10 weeks [see Note 9].
Introduce male breeder rat into breeding cages and monitor female rat for weight gain indicative of successful pregnancy [see Note 10].
Closely monitor cages for pups and document successful breeding. Continue feeding with exclusively nitrogen-15 containing spirulina chow while pups are nursing [see Note 11].
Once pups are weaned, feed with exclusively nitrogen-15 containing spirulina chow for additional 3–4 weeks.
Start chase period by switching to regular nitrogen-14 rodent chow [see Note 12].
3.2. Tissue harvest
Sacrifice time = 0 animal with CO2 as the primary mechanism and secondarily by decapitation.
Harvest all tissues with standard dissection procedures and carefully label and freeze each tissue in a separate tube in liquid nitrogen and then store at −80 °C.
Sacrifice littermates at additional time points and repeat dissection and tissue harvesting as needed [see Note 13] [Fig. 1].
Fig. 1.
Metabolic pulse chase labeling of rats work flow to measure protein turnover dynamics in vivo. Freshly weaned female rat (first generation), is obtained and the diet is switched completely to nitrogen-15 containing food for 10 – 16 weeks. Male rat is introduced and female rat remains on nitrogen-15 diet while pregnant and during the nursing of her pups. Pups (second generation) are sacrificed at several time points including time = 0, before switching to nitrogen-14 chow. For the identification and analysis of extremely long live proteins we found 6 months and 12 month reliable chase durations. As a negative control we analyze an unlabeled pup after feeding regular nitrogen-14 chow. After the animals are sacrificed their tissues are dissected, proteins solubilized and then fractionated. The proteins are then digested to peptides prior to LC-MS and bioinformatic analysis.
3.3. Representative protein fractionation from brain tissue
Homogenize rat brain in 12 mL of tissue homogenization buffer on ice and centrifuge at 4 °C, 1500 g for 15min and the supernatant was collected (post nuclear supernatant).
Centrifuge supernatant at 4 °C, 18000 g for 20 min, collect the resulting supernatant (cytosol) and pellet (crude membrane).
Re-suspend pellet in homogenization buffer and load onto 0.85 M / 1.0 M / 1.2 M sucrose gradient and centrifuged at 4°C, 78000 g for 120 min, and collect the material focused at the 1.0 M/1.2 M interface was collected (synaptosomes).
Add Triton X-100 to 0.5% final concentration and extract at 4 °C, by end-over-end agitation for 20 min.
Centrifuge the extract at 4°C, 32000 g for 20 min, and collect the supernatant (soluble synaptosome).
Re-suspend pellet in homogenization buffer and load onto a 1.0 M / 1.5 M / 2.0 M sucrose gradient and centrifuged at 4°C, 170000 g for 120 min (18).
Collected material at the 1.5 M / 2.0 M interface (post synaptic density, PSD).
Add 0.5% Triton X-100 and detergent soluble material extracted at 4°C, by end-over-end agitation for 10 min.
Centrifuge extract at 4°C, 100000 g for 20 min and re-suspended the pellet in homogenization buffer (purified PSD).
3.4. Protein digestion and peptide preparation
-
1.
To each fraction (100 ug) add TCA to 20% (vol / vol) final concentration, vortex, incubate on ice at 4 °C for 4 hours to overnight [see Note 14].
-
2.
Centrifuge at 14,000 g for 45 min at 4 °C.
-
3.
Discard supernatant and wash the pellet with 1 ml of ice-cold acetone.
-
4.
Centrifuge the tube at 14,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C.
-
5.
Remove the acetone and wash the pellet with 1 ml of ice-cold acetone (two washes in total).
-
6.
Centrifuge the tube at 14,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C.
-
6.
Remove supernatant and air-dry the pellet at room temperature.
-
7.
Add 50 μl of urea buffer and re-suspend dry protein pellet and vortex for at least 1 h.
-
8.
Add 50 μl of 0.2% (wt / vol) ProteaseMAX and vortex for at least 1h.
-
9.
Add 1 μl of TCEP buffer and vortex the mixture for at least 1 additional hour.
-
10.
Add 2 μl of IAA buffer, mix well and incubate in the dark for 20 min.
-
11.
Squelch alkylation reaction by adding 5 μl of TCEP buffer.
-
12.
Add 150 μl of AMBC and mix well [see Note 15].
-
13.
Add 2.5 μl of 1% (wt / vol) proteaseMAX and briefly vortex.
-
14.
Add 2 – 4 μg of sequencing-grade trypsin and incubate the mixture overnight at 37 °C with shaking.
-
15.
Recover the samples and store them at −80 °C [see Note 16].
3.5. Loading the peptides on the column
Thaw peptides and acidify to a 5% (vol / vol) final concentration with formic acid.
Centrifuge the tube at 14,000 g for 15 minutes at room temperature and transfer supernatant to a new tube.
Directly Load peptide sample onto SCX / RP column with a bomb at a pressure of 500–1,000 p.s.i.(22) [see Note 17].
Wash column with buffer A for 30 minutes on bomb.
Pull a 15-cm tip of 100-μm glass capillary and use bomb to pack RP resin.
Flow buffer B for 15 minutes to wash the analytical tip.
Flow buffer A for 15 minutes to equilibrate the analytical tip.
3.5. Liquid chromatography / mass spectrometry
Connect the MudPIT column (frit connected to the analytical tip with an IDEX union) to the HPLC pump and start buffer A to ensure stable flow rates and pressure without leaks.
Generate eleven-step LC and MS methods with Xcaliber software.
Start the eleven-step LC/MS sequence with the Xcaliber software on the MS computer [see Note 18]. The analysis will be performed over a 22–24 hour time period per sample analysis.
3.6. Bioinformatic data analysis
Process acquired .RAW files by first extracting them to .MS1 and .MS2 format with RawExtractor software on the mass spectrometer’s PC (23).
Upload all files (33 total, 11 .RAW, 11 .MS1, and 11 .MS2) into the IP2 software.
Perform Prolucid heavy and light database search with the rat (species matched) protein database and parameters such as a fixed modification of 57.02146 on cysteine, possessing at least one tryptic terminus, and with unlimited missed cleavages (24) [see Note 19] [Fig. 2].
Filter and control false-discovery rate for each dataset individually with DTASelect with target-decoy strategy (concatenated forward-reverse amino acid sequence protein database) to ensure a 0–1% false discovery rate at the protein level(25).
To view the proteins which are identified (based on matched MS scan) only in the heavy search, run “heavy only” DTASelect analysis.
Perform peptide quantitation and enrichment analysis with Census software within IP2 (26–28) [see Note 20] [Fig. 3].
Fig. 2.
Bioinformatic spectral analysis paradigm. Theoretical representation of a zoomed MS1 spectral scan, starred peaks are selected for MS2 and indicate identification of both the abundant nitrogen-14 light (starred peak) and the low abundance nitrogen-15 heavy (starred peak) isotopic peaks. MS1 ion abundance are analyzed as reconstructed chromatograms based on the identification of the light or heavy peak (grey bar). To determine the peptide abundancies, the area under each curve is calculated and compared to determine the relative abundancies of the light “new” and heavy “old” peptides.
Fig. 3.
Incorporation of MS1 isotopic envelope shape measurement into protein turnover protein analysis workflow increases confidence and shows system wide protein degradation dynamics. (A) Theoretical MS1 isotopic spectral envelope after 0 and or 30 day nitrogen-14 chase periods both with heavy identifications (100% of nitrogen atoms are nitrogen-15). The corresponding “light” isotopic envelope enrichment is determined by comparing to the acquired m / z isotopic envelope shape to a broad range of predicted enrichment peak patterns to determine the percentage of nitrogen-15 atoms. (B) Binned peptide nitrogen-15 enrichment distribution from synaptosome extracts after 0, 2, 7, 30, or 180 days of nitrogen-14 chase.
ACKNOWLEDGEMNTS
Funding for JRY has been provided by National Institutes of Health grants P41 GM103533, R01 MH067880, R01 MH100175, UCLA/NHLBI Proteomics Centers (HHSN268201000035C). JNS is supported by the Pathway to Independence Award National Institutes of Health (K99DC013805). We acknowledge Martin Hetzer, and Brandon Toyama for their involvement in initializing the project and also Varda Levram-Ellisman, and Roger Tsien for their input.
Footnotes
Spirulina algae have been successfully grown on nitrogen-15 salts in research labs or can be purchased commercially (7,29). We have found it to be most efficient to purchase the nitrogen-15 spirulina already prepared as ready to eat chow.
We present here a representative protein fractionation scheme to enrich for postsynaptic density proteins. Any protein fractionation or enrichment procedure (that is compatible with MS analysis) could be utilized for the investigation protein turnover dynamics depending on the protein’s specific localization characteristics.
We find that 50mM AMBC is best aliquoted into single use tubes and stored at −20 °C and 8 M urea should be prepared fresh for each experiment.
ProteaseMax can be freeze thawed a few times without any significant decrease in efficacy.
TCEP should be aliquoted into single use tubes at 20 ul per tube.
IAA should be aliquoted into single use tubes at 10 ul per tube.
We believe that for success the MS instrument used for these experiments must be clean, high resolution, and fast scanning. It is our experience that older instruments such as Orbitrap XL do not have the necessary analytical power required for these experiments. The MS should be maintained, cleaned, tuned, and calibrated regularly and as described by the manufacturer.
Acquire a recently weaned animal in accordance with the university policies and IACUC approval. All animal use must be performed consistent with the relevant regulations and governmental guidelines. Make sure all the lab members who will be handling animals are capable and proficient will all animal procedures prior to starting this work.
We suggest providing the nitrogen-15 rodent chow ad libitum. It has been that our experience that mice will eat 2 – 3 grams and rats will eat 5 – 6 grams of spirulina per day. These are rough guidelines and the animals will eat less or more depending on their age and if they are pregnant.
As a cost saving measure to reduce the amount of nitrogen-15 chow necessary for these experiments, we have found that introducing the male rodent only at night into the female’s cage during labeling to be sufficient. Each morning we remove him in the repeat the following day.
Identifying a litter of pups on the day of birth is critical for the time = 0 time point, thus we suggest checking for pups every day once a pregnancy is detected. We have found that on occasion it is difficult to identify pregnant rodents if the litter size is very small however standard practices (such as checking for a plug) can provide some guidance. When the litter size is large (>4) it is easy to identify the pregnancy, at which time the male rat should not be introduced any more.
For the chase period we have found that using “normal chow” (chow containing a nitrogen-14 fraction of 99.636%) to be sufficient for these experiments. The alternative of using special food specifically composed with enriched nitrogen-14 would be a more perfect yet more expensive approach.
We have used several chase period time points to protein decay / turnover and to identify extremely long lived proteins. It has been suggested that a log scale should be used since it will provide a broad range of analytical coverage (30).
We recommend determining the protein concentration and aliquoting 100 ug for each MS analysis prior to precipitating the proteins or digesting to peptides.
It is critical that the urea concentration be ≤ 2M so that trypsin activity will not be inhibited.
We find that once the proteins are digested to peptides they can be stored at −80 °C for up to 3 months. Note, peptides should be frozen before the addition of the FA. Addition of FA prior to freezing will result in degradation and significantly compromised protein identifications.
We find that direct loading of samples onto LC columns is the most sensitive approach since peptide loss is certainly minimized. Details on bomb loading have been previously described (20,21,31). However if the proteins of interest are sufficiently enriched by fractionation autosampler loading should be sufficient for the analysis of low abundance proteins.
MudPIT analysis has been previously described (32–34). Briefly in step one the peptides are eluted from the RP trap to the SCX section with increasing percentages of buffer B. Each of step 2 −11, starts with an increasingly large salt pulse (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100%) of 5 minutes followed by a shallow linear gradient of increasing buffer B. Steps (2 – 11) provide orthogonal separation which facilitates very deep of the complex peptide mixture. Step 1 is typically 45 minutes and steps 2 – 11 are 2 hours each. The exact settings on the MS will vary but we recommend a full-MS from 500 – 1,800 m/z and a minimum intensity threshold of 500 for MS/MS. We reject unassigned and +1 charged precursor ions and use a rolling exclusion list of 20 ions. For these experiments we recommend using 15 – 20 MS/MS per MS precursor scan.
The protein database is critically important since in order to identify a protein with shot-gun proteomics the protein sequence must be present in the protein database. We recommend using Uniprot protein databases.
For the nitrogen-15 stable isotope enrichment calculation we used the Census program to perform 15N enrichment ratio calculation. Census uses the amino acid elemental composition to calculate corresponding isotopic distributions of nitrogen-15 enriched peptides. As nitrogen-15 labeling shifts the mass of peptide based on the number of nitrogen atoms present, Census uses all possible theoretical isotope distributions and maps to experimental ones to find the best match by using Linear regression. Census performs the atomic percent enrichment calculation for each peptide independently, as this can vary depending on a protein’s turnover rate. A detailed description of the Census enrichment calculation analysis has been previously described (14).
REFERENCES
- 1.Shi G, Nakahira K, Hammond S, Rhodes KJ, Schechter LE, and Trimmer JS (1996) Beta subunits promote K+ channel surface expression through effects early in biosynthesis. Neuron 16, 843–852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Coplen TB (2011) Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable-isotope-ratio and gas-ratio measurement results. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM 25, 2538–2560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sastre M, Turner RS, and Levy E (1998) X11 interaction with beta-amyloid precursor protein modulates its cellular stabilization and reduces amyloid beta-protein secretion. The Journal of biological chemistry 273, 22351–22357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Belle A, Tanay A, Bitincka L, Shamir R, and O’Shea EK (2006) Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 13004–13009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cambridge SB, Gnad F, Nguyen C, Bermejo JL, Kruger M, and Mann M (2011) Systems-wide proteomic analysis in mammalian cells reveals conserved, functional protein turnover. Journal of proteome research 10, 5275–5284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Guan S, Price JC, Ghaemmaghami S, Prusiner SB, and Burlingame AL (2012) Compartment modeling for mammalian protein turnover studies by stable isotope metabolic labeling. Analytical chemistry 84, 4014–4021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Price JC, Guan S, Burlingame A, Prusiner SB, and Ghaemmaghami S (2010) Analysis of proteome dynamics in the mouse brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 14508–14513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Savas JN, Toyama BH, Xu T, Yates JR 3rd, and Hetzer MW (2012) Extremely long-lived nuclear pore proteins in the rat brain. Science 335, 942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Toyama BH, Savas JN, Park SK, Harris MS, Ingolia NT, Yates JR 3rd, and Hetzer MW (2013) Identification of long-lived proteins reveals exceptional stability of essential cellular structures. Cell 154, 971–982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fischer CA, and Morell P (1974) Turnover of proteins in myelin and myelin-like material of mouse brain. Brain research 74, 51–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shapira R, Wilhelmi MR, and Kibler RF (1981) Turnover of myelin proteins of rat brain, determined in fractions separated by sedimentation in a continuous sucrose gradient. Journal of neurochemistry 36, 1427–1432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lynnerup N, Kjeldsen H, Heegaard S, Jacobsen C, and Heinemeier J (2008) Radiocarbon dating of the human eye lens crystallines reveal proteins without carbon turnover throughout life. PloS one 3, e1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ko J, Fuccillo MV, Malenka RC, and Sudhof TC (2009) LRRTM2 functions as a neurexin ligand in promoting excitatory synapse formation. Neuron 64, 791–798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.MacCoss MJ, Wu CC, Matthews DE, and Yates JR 3rd. (2005) Measurement of the isotope enrichment of stable isotope-labeled proteins using high-resolution mass spectra of peptides. Analytical chemistry 77, 7646–7653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McClatchy DB, Dong MQ, Wu CC, Venable JD, and Yates JR 3rd. (2007) 15N metabolic labeling of mammalian tissue with slow protein turnover. Journal of proteome research 6, 2005–2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wu CC, MacCoss MJ, Howell KE, Matthews DE, and Yates JR 3rd. (2004) Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis. Analytical chemistry 76, 4951–4959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McClatchy DB, and Yates JR 3rd. (2014) Stable isotope labeling in mammals (SILAM). Methods in molecular biology 1156, 133–146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Carlin RK, Grab DJ, Cohen RS, and Siekevitz P (1980) Isolation and characterization of postsynaptic densities from various brain regions: enrichment of different types of postsynaptic densities. The Journal of cell biology 86, 831–845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Niessen S, McLeod I, and Yates JR 3rd. (2006) HPLC separation of digested proteins and preparation for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization analysis. CSH protocols 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Savas JN, De Wit J, Comoletti D, Zemla R, Ghosh A, and Yates JR 3rd. (2014) Ecto-Fc MS identifies ligand-receptor interactions through extracellular domain Fc fusion protein baits and shotgun proteomic analysis. Nat Protoc 9, 2061–2074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fonslow BR, Stein BD, Webb KJ, Xu T, Choi J, Park SK, and Yates JR 3rd. (2013) Digestion and depletion of abundant proteins improves proteomic coverage. Nature methods 10, 54–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Magdeldin S, Moresco JJ, Yamamoto T, and Yates JR 3rd. (2014) Off-Line Multidimensional Liquid Chromatography and Auto Sampling Result in Sample Loss in LC/LC-MS/MS. Journal of proteome research [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McDonald WH, Tabb DL, Sadygov RG, MacCoss MJ, Venable J, Graumann J, Johnson JR, Cociorva D, and Yates JR 3rd. (2004) MS1, MS2, and SQT-three unified, compact, and easily parsed file formats for the storage of shotgun proteomic spectra and identifications. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM 18, 2162–2168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eng JK, McCormack AL, and Yates JR (1994) An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 5, 976–989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tabb DL, McDonald WH, and Yates JR 3rd. (2002) DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. Journal of proteome research 1, 21–26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Park SK, Venable JD, Xu T, and Yates JR 3rd. (2008) A quantitative analysis software tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature methods 5, 319–322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Venable JD, Wohlschlegel J, McClatchy DB, Park SK, and Yates JR 3rd. (2007) Relative quantification of stable isotope labeled peptides using a linear ion trap-Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer. Analytical chemistry 79, 3056–3064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.MacCoss MJ, Wu CC, Liu H, Sadygov R, and Yates JR 3rd. (2003) A correlation algorithm for the automated quantitative analysis of shotgun proteomics data. Analytical chemistry 75, 6912–6921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McClatchy DB, Liao L, Park SK, Venable JD, and Yates JR (2007) Quantification of the synaptosomal proteome of the rat cerebellum during post-natal development. Genome research 17, 1378–1388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tsien RY (2013) Very long-term memories may be stored in the pattern of holes in the perineuronal net. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 12456–12461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.MacCoss MJ, Wu CC, and Yates JR 3rd. (2002) Probability-based validation of protein identifications using a modified SEQUEST algorithm. Analytical chemistry 74, 5593–5599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Washburn MP, Wolters D, and Yates JR 3rd. (2001) Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nature biotechnology 19, 242–247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Link AJ, Eng J, Schieltz DM, Carmack E, Mize GJ, Morris DR, Garvik BM, and Yates JR 3rd. (1999) Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nature biotechnology 17, 676–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liao L, McClatchy DB, and Yates JR (2009) Shotgun proteomics in neuroscience. Neuron 63, 12–26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



