Abstract
Various interferon (IFN)-inducible transmembrane (IFITM) proteins are known to be expressed in human tissues though only IFITM 1–3 are inducible by IFN. Numerous studies have shown that activation of IFITM3 could suppress infection by influenza and coronaviruses such as the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). In view of the potential application of IFITM proteins’ induction to target SARS-CoV-2 infection that causes COVID-19, this article layout insights into the known antiviral mechanisms and therapeutic agents related to IFITM. Blocking viral entry through various mechanisms and the potential application of the FDA approved immunosuppressant agent, mycophenolic acid, as inducer of IFITM3 are among those discussed.
Highlights
-
•
Interferon -inducible transmembrane (IFITM) proteins are readily expressed in human tissues.
-
•
IFITM proteins block viral entry into host cells through diverse mechanisms.
-
•
IFITM3 suppress infection by influenza and coronaviruses such as MERS-CoV.
-
•
Combination therapy with mycophenolic acid and IFN can be used for treatment of covid19.
1. Introduction
The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19 and first identified in the Wuhan region of China [1] is an enveloped positive sense RNA virus of the family Coronaviridae and genus Betacoronavirus ([2]. On the basis of 79.5% genomic homology to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) renamed the virus as SARS-CoV-2 [2]. Phylogenic analysis also demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 have 97% nucleotide sequence similarity with a bat SARS-like (SL) CoV which was discovered in 2013 in a cave in China [3]. The receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 binds to angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) from human and other species [4].
Interferon (IFN) is produced by the innate immunity in response to the viral aggression. It induces the expression of interferon-inducible transmembrane (IFITM) proteins. The IFITM genes are highly conserved in vertebrates [5] and are found on cell membrane, early and late endosomes as well as lysosomes. The IFITM1, IFITM2, IFITM3, IFITM5, and IFITM10 are expressed in humans but only IFITM 1–3 are IFN-inducible and therefore related to the immune system [6].
2. Functional link between IFITM and antiviral activity
It is noticeable that two phenylalanine residues are critical for the antiviral activity of IFITM3. As evidence for this, mutation of F75 and F78 called (IFITM3-FF mutant) could abrogate its antiviral activity [5]. Several In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that IFITM3 might be efficient against influenza and other respiratory viruses including coronaviruses. For example, the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) cell entry is inhibited by IFITM proteins [5,7].
When surface proteins of enveloped viruses attach to a cellular receptor, they undergo conformational changes which lead to viral entry [8]. The spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 also needs proteolytic cleavage by type II membrane serine proteases (TMPRSS) and lysosomal cathepsin L for fusion. Between S1 and S2 subunits of SARS-CoV-2 is a furin cleavage site (RRAR motif), which is similar to highly pathogen influenza viruses [9]. IFITM proteins block the entry of several enveloped viruses by blocking fusion step at hemifusion stage, formation of fusion pore stage by decreasing plasma membrane fluidity or by expanding outer membrane leaflet curvature; and its function is independent of viral receptor expression [7,8].
It should be noted that Coronaviridae family viruses cell entry in 293T cells but not A549 can be inhibited by IFTIM proteins [7]. The inhibition of coronavirus (e.g. MERS-CoV) into host cells by IFITM3 was also shown to be insensitive to cholesterol accumulation in endosomes [7]. While these results suggest that the antiviral effect of IFITM3 was not associated with modulation of cholesterol synthesis/transport, other reports show disruption of cholesterol hemostasis as the antiviral mechanism of IFITM [10].
3. Can we use the combination of mycophenolic acid and interferon for treatment of covid19?
Mycophenolic acid (MPA, Fig. 1 ) is an FDA-approved immunosuppressant which is used as prophylaxis against organ rejection [11]. It is an active metabolite of the prodrug morpholinoethyl ester derivative, mycophenolate mofetil (Fig. 1), which is hydrolyzed in vivo to release it. By targeting the key enzyme of purine synthesis, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, MPA has been shown to suppress the proliferation of both B and T lymphocytes. The selectivity of mycophenolic acid to B and T lymphocytes appears to be due to the crucial role of de novo purines synthesis in lymphocytes proliferation. Hence, it is among the clinically relevant immunosuppressive agents that are effectively used against rejection in solid-organ transplantations. Recently, much attention has been paid to its potent antiviral effects [12,13]. Pan et al. [14] reported that treatment of Huh7 reporter cell line with MPA leads to significant upregulation of the IFN regulatory factor 1 and 9 as well as IFITM3. They also found that combination of MPA and IFN-α has synergistic antiviral effect against hepatitis C viral infection as well as the expression of the interferon-stimulated genes. Potent in vitro antiviral effects of MPA and its derivative, mycophenolate mofetil, against four coronaviruses infections (i.e HCoV-OC43, HCoV-NL63, MERS-CoV and MHV-A59) have also been reported previously [15]. Hart et al. [16] reported that combination of IFN-β and MPA can synergistically inhibit MERS-CoV infection in Vero E6 cells, while Kato et al. [17] showed anti SARS-CoV-2 activity of MPA and IMD-0354. Taken together, a therapeutic strategy based on combining exogenous IFN-β and MPA may be of benefit in high risk patients. Overall, further evidence is required to establish the mechanism of action and efficacy of IFITM3 and possible role of MPA administration against SARS-CoV-2 infection but research in this direction should be encouraged (see Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.
Structures of mycophenolic acid and mycophenolate mofetil.
Fig. 2.
Schematic representation of the potential implications of IFITM proteins in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 entry at distinct stages of host cell trafficking. SARS-CoV-2 exploits host cells by entry through an endosomal or a non-endosomal pathway as seen in most enveloped viruses, and replicating in newly induced double membrane vesicles (DMVs) shielded from host immune responses, as a characteristic of the coronavirus family. After binding to the ACE2 receptor, an activation of the S protein by pH dependent or pH independent proteases (serine and cysteine-like) is required for an efficient fusion. IFITM1 is expressed mainly at the plasma membrane level, while IFITM3 is mainly intracellular being integrated in the membranes of the endosomal compartments. IFTIM genes overexpression and proteins can act as cellular inhibitors of the early phases of the viral infectious cycle such as the entry and the fusion steps. (Adapted after Smith et al. [18]).
Declaration of competing interest
This statement is to certify that all Authors have seen and approved the manuscript being submitted, and agree to the submission to BIOCHIMIE. We warrant that the article is the Authors' original work. We warrant that the article has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and will not be submitted for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part, while under consideration for publication in BIOCHIMIE. On behalf of all Co-Authors, the corresponding Author shall bear full responsibility for the submission. We attest to the fact that all Authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and their interpretation, and agree to its submission to BIOCHIMIE. We further attest that no other person has fulfilled the requirements for authorship as stated in the Elsevier Authorship-factsheet (2017_ETHICS_AUTH02 - attached), but is not included in the list of authors, and that no other person has contributed substantially to the writing of the manuscript but is not included either among the authors or in the acknowledgements. All authors agree that no modification to the author list can be made without the written acceptance of all authors and the formal approval of the Editor-in-Chief. All authors accept that the Editor-in-Chief's decisions over acceptance or rejection or in the event of any breach of the Principles of Ethical Publishing in BIOCHIMIE being discovered, of retraction are final.
References
- 1.Nabavi S.F., Habtemariam S., Clementi E., Berindan-Neagoe I., Cismaru C., Rasekhian M., Banach M., Izadi M., Bagheri M., Bagheri M.S., Nabavi S.M. Lessons learned from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV: FDA-approved Abelson tyrosine-protein kinase 2 inhibitors may help us combat SARS-CoV-2. Arch. Med. Sci. 2020;16:519–521. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.94504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:536–544. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhou P., Yang X.L., Wang X.G., Hu B., Zhang L., Zhang W., Si H.R., Zhu Y., Li B., Huang C.L., Chen H.D., Chen J., Luo Y., Guo H., Jiang R.D., Liu M.Q., Chen Y., Shen X.R., Wang X., Zheng X.S., Zhao K., Chen Q.J., Deng F., Liu L.L., Yan B., Zhan F.X., Wang Y.Y., Xiao G.F., Shi Z.L. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhang H., Penninger J.M., Li Y., Zhong N., Slutsky A.S. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:586–590. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05985-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Winkler M., Wrensch F., Bosch P., Knoth M., Schindler M., Gartner S., Pohlmann S. Analysis of IFITM-IFITM interactions by a flow cytometry-based FRET assay. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:3859. doi: 10.3390/ijms20163859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yip T.F., Selim A.S.M., Lian I., Lee S.M. Advancements in host-based interventions for influenza treatment. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1547. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wrensch F., Winkler M., Pohlmann S. IFITM proteins inhibit entry driven by the MERS-coronavirus spike protein: evidence for cholesterol-independent mechanisms. Viruses. 2014;6:3683–3698. doi: 10.3390/v6093683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huang I.C., Bailey C.C., Weyer J.L., Radoshitzky S.R., Becker M.M., Chiang J.J., Brass A.L., Ahmed A.A., Chi X., Dong L., Longobardi L.E., Boltz D., Kuhn J.H., Elledge S.J., Bavari S., Denison M.R., Choe H., Farzan M. Distinct patterns of IFITM-mediated restriction of filoviruses, SARS coronavirus, and influenza A virus. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ou X., Liu Y., Lei X., Li P., Mi D., Ren L., Guo L., Guo R., Chen T., Hu J., Xiang Z., Mu Z., Chen X., Chen J., Hu K., Jin Q., Wang J., Qian Z. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1620. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15562-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Amini-Bavil-Olyaee S., Choi Y.J., Lee J.H., Shi M., Huang I.C., Farzan M., Jung J.U. The antiviral effector IFITM3 disrupts intracellular cholesterol homeostasis to block viral entry. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:452–464. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jones A., Clary M.J., McDermott E., Coscia L.A., Constantinescu S., Moritz M.J., Armenti V.T. Outcomes of pregnancies fathered by solid-organ transplant recipients exposed to mycophenolic acid products. Prog. Transplant. 2013;23:153–157. doi: 10.7182/pit2013636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yin Y., Wang Y., Dang W., Xu L., Su J., Zhou X., Wang W., Felczak K., van der Laan L.J., Pankiewicz K.W. Mycophenolic acid potently inhibits rotavirus infection with a high barrier to resistance development. Antivir. Res. 2016;133:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.To K.K., Mok K.Y., Chan A.S., Cheung N.N., Wang P., Lui Y.M., Chan J.F., Chen H., Chan K.H., Kao R.Y. Mycophenolic acid, an immunomodulator, has potent and broad-spectrum in vitro antiviral activity against pandemic, seasonal and avian influenza viruses affecting humans. J. Gen. Virol. 2016;97:1807–1817. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pan Q., de Ruiter P.E., Metselaar H.J., Kwekkeboom J., de Jonge J., Tilanus H.W., Janssen H.L., van der Laan L.J. Mycophenolic acid augments interferon-stimulated gene expression and inhibits hepatitis C Virus infection in vitro and in vivo. Hepatology. 2012;55:1673–1683. doi: 10.1002/hep.25562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shen L., Niu J., Wang C., Huang B., Wang W., Zhu N., Deng Y., Wang H., Ye F., Cen S. High-throughput screening and identification of potent broad-spectrum inhibitors of coronaviruses. J. Virol. 2019;93 doi: 10.1128/JVI.00023-19. e00023-00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hart B.J., Dyall J., Postnikova E., Zhou H., Kindrachuk J., Johnson R.F., Olinger G.G., Jr., Frieman M.B., Holbrook M.R., Jahrling P.B. Interferon-β and mycophenolic acid are potent inhibitors of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in cell-based assays. J. Gen. Virol. 2014;95:571. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.061911-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kato F., Matsuyama S., Kawase M., Hishiki T., Katoh H., Takeda M. Antiviral activities of mycophenolic acid and IMD-0354 against SARS-CoV-2. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Smith S., Weston S., Kellam P., Marsh M. IFITM proteins—cellular inhibitors of viral entry. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2014;4:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


