Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Aug 13;9(33):e00768-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00768-20

Draft Genome Sequences of Pseudomonas koreensis Strain UASWS1668, Bacillus megaterium Strain UASWS1667, and Paenibacillus sp. Strain UASWS1643, Considered Potential Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria

Julien Crovadore a, Bastien Cochard a, Romain Chablais a, Martine Haenzi a, François Raffini a, François Lefort a,
Editor: J Cameron Thrashb
PMCID: PMC7427193  PMID: 32817155

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) include species in the genera Bacillus, Paenibacillus, and Pseudomonas. We report here the draft genome sequences of the strains Pseudomonas koreensis UASWS1668 and Bacillus megaterium UASWS1667, isolated from a horse chestnut tree, and Paenibacillus sp. strain UASWS1643, isolated from a tomato stem. Auxin production and phosphate solubilization were biochemically confirmed.

ABSTRACT

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) include species in the genera Bacillus, Paenibacillus, and Pseudomonas. We report here the draft genome sequences of the strains Pseudomonas koreensis UASWS1668 and Bacillus megaterium UASWS1667, isolated from a horse chestnut tree, and Paenibacillus sp. strain UASWS1643, isolated from a tomato stem. Auxin production and phosphate solubilization were biochemically confirmed.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Pseudomonas koreensis strain UASWS1668 and Bacillus megaterium strain UASWS1667, isolated from a horse chestnut tree, and Paenibacillus sp. strain UASWS1643, isolated from a tomato stem, were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and later confirmed by whole 16S rRNA gene sequences extracted from their genome assemblies. A whole-genome sequencing strategy was chosen to confirm the potential of these bacteria as biostimulants. Paenibacillus sp. strain UASWS1643 showed 97.52% shared identity with the closest NCBI-referenced strain, Paenibacillus xylanexedens strain PAMC 22703 (1). P. koreensis has shown antifungal activities and plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) properties (2), particularly in heavy metal-contaminated soils (3) and under high-salt conditions (46), increasing plant fresh weight and root development. Bacillus megaterium is known for plant growth induction (7, 8), its antifungal properties, its resistance to heavy metals (8, 9), and adaption to acidic stress (10). The genus Paenibacillus, widely present in the soils and rhizospheres of many plants, commonly hosts PGPR species (11, 12), with nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, auxin production, and siderophore secretion ability (11, 12).

Bacteria were isolated from the diseased tissues of horse chestnut or tomato according to a published method (13). DNA was extracted from pure cultures grown exponentially from a single colony in LB broth, with a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide protocol (14). Sequenced 16S amplicons produced with primers 27F and 1482 R (15) were identified by BLAST (16). Sequencing libraries were produced with the TruSeq Nano DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, USA). Whole-genome sequencing was performed with a MiniSeq high-output kit, in one Illumina MiniSeq run in 2 × 151-bp paired-end read format. The read quality was controlled with FastQC version 0.11.5 (17). Genome assemblies were computed with the SPAdes version 3.13.0 genome assembler (18), set to “paired-end” assembly and “careful” mode. The resulting contigs were ordered with BioEdit version 7.0.5 (19) and analyzed with QUAST version 4.6.3 (20), with the setting “QUAST: skip contigs shorter than 200 bp.” Automated gene annotations were carried out by the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) version 4.1 (21) and RAST version 2.0 (22), with the ClassicRAST annotation scheme. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production and phosphate solubilization were estimated according to published protocols (23, 24).

The sequence details are given in Table 1. Using PlasmidFinder version 1.3 (25) and plasmidSPAdes (26), with default settings, no plasmids were found in Pseudomonas koreensis UASWS1668 or Paenibacillus sp. strain UASWS1643, while Bacillus megaterium UASWS1667 displayed 7 plasmids. No complete transposons or phages were found in Bacillus megaterium UASWS1667, whereas Paenibacillus sp. strain UASWS1643 harbored 1 phage on contig 116, and Pseudomonas koreensis UASWS1668 had 2 phages in contigs 68 and 70. Toxins and superantigens as well as virulence and disease genes were absent from all 3 strains, allowing these bacteria to be considered for agronomical use. All strains were predicted to synthesize antibiotics of the bacitracin type and to resist antibiotics and heavy metals, with 54 genes for Pseudomonas koreensis UASWS1668, 37 genes for Bacillus megaterium UASWS1667, and 47 genes for Paenibacillus sp. strain UASWS1643. Biochemical tests confirmed that the three strains produce auxin and solubilize phosphate, as predicted by the genome sequences.

TABLE 1.

Genome sequence statistics summary and characteristics for Pseudomonas koreensis strain UASWS1668, Bacillus megaterium strain UASWS1667, and Paenibacillus sp. strain UASWS1643

Characteristic Data for strain:
Paenibacillus sp. UASWS1643 Bacillus megaterium UASWS1667 Pseudomonas koreensis UASWS1668
Total length (bp) 7,354,805 5,171,380 6,177,111
GC content (%) 45.88 38.04 60.27
No. of CDSsa (PGAP) 6,422 5,232 5,660
No. of CDSs (RAST) 6,887 5,600 5,440
No. of tRNAs 63 70 59
No. of rRNAs 18 13 6
No. of phages 1 0 2
No. of plasmids 0 7 0
No. of auxin genes 4 4 4
No. of phosphorus metabolism genes 52 26 38
No. of nitrogen metabolism genes 34 12 14
Sequencing yield (Mbp) 445.96 550.32 574.37
Final coverage (×) 60.6 106.4 93
SRA accession no. for raw reads SRX6863606 SRX6863642 SRX6863625
No. of reads 2,953,376 3,644,512 3,803,796
No. of scaffolds 117 113 70
Scaffold N50 (bp) 253,767 1,095,828 663,749
GenBank accession no. for assembled genome VXKZ01000000 VXLA01000000 VXLB01000000
BioProject accession no. PRJNA543413 PRJNA543415 PRJNA543411
BioSample accession no. SAMN11658785 SAMN11658787 SAMN11658786
a

CDSs, coding DNA sequences.

Data availability.

This genome sequencing project has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and genome databases. The genome, SRA, BioProject, and BioSample accession numbers and statistics for the three individual strains are given in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the Strategic Research Fund of the HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hwang J, Shin SC, Han JW, Hong SP, Min W-K, Chung D, Kim HJ. Complete genome sequence of Paenibacillus xylanexedens PAMC 22703, a xylan-degrading bacterium. Mar Genom 100788. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2020.100788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gu Y, Ma Y-N, Wang J, Xia Z, Wei H-L. 2020. Genomic insights into a plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas koreensis strain with cyclic lipopeptide-mediated antifungal activity. Microbiologyopen e1092. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giridhar Babu A, Shea PJ, Sudhakar D, Jung I-B, Oh B-T. 2015. Potential use of Pseudomonas koreensis AGB-1 in association with Miscanthus sinensis to remediate heavy metal(loid)-contaminated mining site soil. J Environ Manage 151:160–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Krishnamoorthy R, Kim K, Subramanian P, Senthilkumar M, Anandham R, Sa T. 2016. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated bacteria isolated from salt-affected soil enhances the tolerance of maize to salinity in coastal reclamation soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 231:233–239. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Selvakumar G, Shagol CC, Kim K, Han S, Sa T. 2018. Spore associated bacteria regulates maize root K+/Na+ ion homeostasis to promote salinity tolerance during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. BMC Plant Biol 18:109. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1317-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kasotia A, Varma A, Choudhary DK. 2015. Pseudomonas-mediated mitigation of salt stress and growth promotion in Glycine max. Agric Res 4:31–41. doi: 10.1007/s40003-014-0139-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.López-Bucio J, Campos-Cuevas JC, Hernández-Calderón E, Velásquez-Becerra C, Farías-Rodríguez R, Macías-Rodríguez LI, Valencia-Cantero E. 2007. Bacillus megaterium rhizobacteria promote growth and alter root-system architecture through an auxin- and ethylene-independent signaling mechanism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:207–217. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-20-2-0207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nascimento FX, Hernández AG, Glick BR, Rossi MJ. 2020. Plant growth-promoting activities and genomic analysis of the stress-resistant Bacillus megaterium STB1, a bacterium of agricultural and biotechnological interest. Biotechnol Rep (Amst) 25:e00406. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cai X, Zheng X, Zhang D, Iqbal W, Liu C, Yang B, Zhao X, Lu X, Mao Y. 2019. Microbial characterization of heavy metal resistant bacterial strains isolated from an electroplating wastewater treatment plant. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 181:472–480. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Goswami G, Panda D, Samanta R, Boro RC, Modi MK, Bujarbaruah KM, Barooah M. 2018. Bacillus megaterium adapts to acid stress condition through a network of genes: insight from a genome-wide transcriptome analysis. Sci Rep 8:16105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34221-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Govindasamy V, Senthilkumar M, Magheshwaran V, Kumar U, Bose P, Sharma V, Annapurna K. 2011. Bacillus and Paenibacillus spp.: potential PGPR for sustainable agriculture, p 333–364. In Maheshwari DK. (ed), Plant growth and health promoting bacteria. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grady EN, MacDonald J, Liu L, Richman A, Yuan Z-C. 2016. Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: a review. Microb Cell Fact 15:203. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0603-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lefort F, Crovadore J, Gilodi R, Calmin F, Oszako T, Nowakowska JA. 2009. An unknown trees die back caused by Pseudomonas species in Switzerland. Folia For Pol Ser A For 51:171–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lefort F, Douglas GC. 1999. An efficient micro-method of DNA isolation from mature leaves of four hardwood tree species Acer, Fraxinus, Prunus and Quercus. Ann For Sci 56:259–263. doi: 10.1051/forest:19990308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lane DJ. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, p 115–175. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (ed), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
  • 18.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser (Oxf) 41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gordon SA, Weber RP. 1951. Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiol 26:192–195. doi: 10.1104/pp.26.1.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu Z, Li YC, Zhang S, Fu Y, Fan X, Patel JS, Zhang M. 2015. Characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from calcareous soils. Appl Soil Ecol 96:217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carattoli A, Zankari E, Garcia-Fernandez A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Aarestrup FM, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Antipov D, Hartwick N, Shen M, Raiko M, Lapidus A, Pevzner PA. 2016. plasmidSPAdes: assembling plasmids from whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32:3380–3387. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This genome sequencing project has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and genome databases. The genome, SRA, BioProject, and BioSample accession numbers and statistics for the three individual strains are given in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES