Skip to main content
Cell Communication and Signaling : CCS logoLink to Cell Communication and Signaling : CCS
. 2020 Aug 14;18:127. doi: 10.1186/s12964-020-00625-7

Role of tyrosine kinases in bladder cancer progression: an overview

Amir Sadra Zangouei 1, Amir Hossein Barjasteh 1, Hamid Reza Rahimi 2, Majid Mojarrad 2, Meysam Moghbeli 2,
PMCID: PMC7427778  PMID: 32795296

Abstract

Background

Bladder cancer (BCa) is a frequent urothelial malignancy with a high ratio of morbidity and mortality. Various genetic and environmental factors are involved in BCa progression. Since, majority of BCa cases are diagnosed after macroscopic clinical symptoms, it is required to find efficient markers for the early detection. Receptor tyrosine-kinases (RTKs) and non-receptor tyrosine-kinases (nRTKs) have pivotal roles in various cellular processes such as growth, migration, differentiation, and metabolism through different signaling pathways. Tyrosine-kinase deregulations are observed during tumor progressions via mutations, amplification, and chromosomal abnormalities which introduces these factors as important candidates of anti-cancer therapies.

Main body

For the first time in present review we have summarized all of the reported tyrosine-kinases which have been significantly associated with the clinicopathological features of BCa patients.

Conclusions

This review highlights the importance of tyrosine-kinases as critical markers in early detection and therapeutic purposes among BCa patients and clarifies the molecular biology of tyrosine-kinases during BCa progression and metastasis.

Download video file (51.7MB, mp4)

Video abstract

Keywords: Bladder cancer, Tyrosine-kinase, Diagnosis, Targeted therapy, Panel marker

Background

Bladder cancer (BCa) is the 10th most frequent malignancy worldwide [1], and the fourth most prevalent malignancy among American males with 7% of all cancer cases [2]. There are an estimated 62,100 new BCa cases and 13,050 deaths annually among American males [2]. Approximately 430,000 new cases of BCa and 150,000 deaths were reported in 2012 worldwide [3]. The highest incidence rates were observed in both sexes in European countries and Northern America, while the Lebanese females had the highest rates in the world [1]. There is a correlation between age and higher risk of BCa progression [4]. The BCa is also three to four times more frequent among males compared with females [5]. The prevalence of BCa can be associated with environmental and genetic determinants, which are different among racial/ethnic groups [6, 7]. Based on histopathologic features of tumor cells, there are three main types of BCa including: transitional cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma, which account for 90, 5%, and less than 2% of BCa cases, respectively [8]. Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) or superficial bladder cancer which constitutes about 75% of newly diagnosed cases is confined to the lamina propria without invasion to underlying muscle tissues. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) involves about 25% of cases that has invasion to the muscularis propria and perivesical fat [9]. There are various treatment options for the BCa including radical cystectomy, transurethral resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies against specific signaling proteins [10, 11]. Over the past decades, mutations in kinases have been shown to be engaged in bladder malignancies [12]. Protein kinases are a large family of proteins with more than 500 members which are encoded by ~ 2% of all human genome. Their main function is the phosphorylation of definite amino acids on key proteins involved in critical cellular mechanisms such as proliferation, differentiation, survival, and apoptosis [13, 14]. As these cellular processes are of paramount importance, the enzymatic function of these kinases is strictly regulated [15]. Tyrosine-kinases (TKs) are one of the major types of protein kinases which induce phosphorylation of tyrosine residues on a substrate protein. TKs are found in nuclear and membrane-bound forms as well as transmembrane receptors [16]. There are about ninety TKs in human genome which are involved in various cellular processes such as differentiation, metabolism, motility, and proliferation [17, 18]. Receptor tyrosine-kinases are up regulated in various tumors and are considered to be potential oncogenes involved in cancer initiation and development [19, 20]. Therefore, targeting these oncogenes and inhibiting their expression may result in good clinical outcomes [21]. The majority of TKs share a similar structure consisting of a conserved catalytic domain and regulatory domains which are located within or outside the catalytic domain. The catalytic domain contains 250–300 amino acids in 12 conserved subdomains and catalyzes the transfer of a phosphate group from ATP to the tyrosine residue. Activation and recruitment of downstream signaling pathways occur following this phosphorylation. Regulatory domains regulate the kinase activity and its localization in response to different stimuli [22, 23]. Studies have shown oncogenic characteristics of TKs [24]. Dysregulation of TKs by gain of function mutations or over expression occurs in various malignancies like BCa which accelerates tumor proliferation and progression [25, 26]. Therefore, inhibiting signaling pathways of different tyrosine kinases using tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been reported as efficient method of tumor targeted therapies [2729]. BCa patients are diagnosed with a broad range of tumor behaviors from low grade and stage tumors with less aggressiveness to tumors with advanced grade, stage, and distant metastasis. Clinicopathological features are commonly used to predict tumor growth, recurrence, and patient’s survival. However, the gene expression profiling and molecular pathway analysis have gained growing attention as a novel and promising methods for the prediction of disease course and prognosis in BCa patients [7, 30, 31]. Since, tyrosine-kinases have essential roles in BCa progression, in present review we have summarized all of the studies which have been assessed the role of tyrosine-kinases in BCa patients in the world (Table 1).

Table 1.

All of the tyrosine kinases which have been significantly associated with clinicopathological features of BCa patients in the world

Study Year Gene Country Sample Results
RTK class I
 COOMBS [32] 1993 HER2 UK

91 tumor tissues

99 control tissues

Correlation between tumor grade and HER2 up regulation
 SIMON [33] 2003 HER2 Switzerland 2317 tumor tissues Correlation between tumor grade and HER2 up regulation
 NADOUSHAN [34] 2009 HER2 Iran 75 patients Correlation between tumor grade and HER2 up regulation
 Krüger [35] 2002 HER2 Germany 138 patients Correlation between tumor grade and HER2 up regulation
 COOGAN [36] 2004 HER2 USA 54 patients Correlation between tumor grade and HER2 up regulation
 LATIF [37] 2004 HER2 UK 75 patients Increased HER2 copy number
 LATIF [38] 2003 HER2 UK 25 patients Increased HER2 copy number
 FLEISCHMANN [39] 2011 HER2 Switzerland 150 patients HER2 amplification was correlated with poor prognosis.
 HANSEL [40] 2008 HER2 USA 53 patients HER2 amplification was correlated with high-stage (pT4).
 EISSA [41] 2005 HER2 Egypt 88 patients HER2 expression was correlated with lymph node involvement.
 ABDELRAHMAN [42] 2019 HER2 Egypt 60 patients HER2 up regulation was correlated RFS and PFS.
 DING [43] 2015 HER2 China 238 patients HER2 up regulation was correlated with advanced grade and stage.
 BREYER [44] 2016 HER2 Germany 355 patients HER2 up regulation was correlated with advanced grade and stage.
 ARIKAN [45] 2015 HER2 Turkey

44 patients

40 controls

HER2 urinary level was correlated with advanced grade.
 KOLLA [46] 2008 HER2 India 90 patients HER2 expression was correlated with advanced grade, stage, and lymph node metastasis.
 KOGA [47] 2011 HER2 Japan 35 patients HER2 up regulation was correlated with poor prognosis.
 INOUE [48] 2014 HER2 Japan 201 patients HER2 up regulation was correlated with CRT resistance.
 SASAKI [49] 2014 HER2 Japan 171 patients HER2 up regulation was correlated with grade and recurrence.
 KIM [50] 2016 HER2 South Korea 6 patients HER2 protein up regulation and gene amplification
 MEMON [51] 2004 HER3, HER4 Denmark 88 patients HER3 and HER4 up regulations were correlated with good prognosis.
 GUNES [52] 2013 EGFR, HER2, ErbB3, ErbB4 Turkey 40 patients EGFR and HER2 were down regulated and up regulated respectively.
 Türkeri [53] 1998 EGFR Turkey 21 patients EGFR expression was correlated with stage.
 POPOV [54] 2004 EGFR France

113 patients

10 controls

EGFR expression was correlated with survival.
 ARFAOUI [55] 2016 EGFR Tunisia

64 patients

6 controls

EGFR expression was correlated with grade and stage.
 BERGER [56] 1987 EGFR UK 31 patients EGFR expression was correlated with grade and stage.
 KHALED [57] 2009 EGFR Egypt 59 patients EGFR expression was correlated with stage and survival.
 LIPPONEN [58] 1994 EGFR, HER2 Finland 234 patients EGFR expression was correlated with grade and aneuploidy.
 MEMON [59] 2006 EGFR, HER2, HER3, HER4 Denmark 88 patients HER1–4 were correlated with poor prognosis.
 KIM [60] 2014 EGFR Korea 80 patients EGFR up regulation was correlated with chemo resistance.
 COLQUHOUN [61] 2006 EGFR UK 110 patients EGFR expression was correlated with recurrence.
 Thøgersen [62] 1999 EGFR Denmark 54 patients EGFR up regulation was correlated with stage.
 MANSOUR [63] 2018 EGFR Egypt 58 patients EGFR up regulation was correlated with poor prognosis.
 Bryan [64] 2015 EGFR UK

436 patients

60 controls

EGFR urine levels were correlated with grade and survival.
 CHU [65] 2013 EGFR China

908 patients

1239 controls

Polymorphism was correlated with BCa progression.
 MASON [66] 2009 EGFR USA

857 patients

1191 controls

Polymorphism was correlated with BCa progression.
 LI [67] 2015 HER2, EGFR, VEGFR USA 16 patients EGFR up regulation
 RAJJAYABUN [63, 68] 2005 EGFR, HER2 UK 58 patients HER2 and EGFR up regulations
 IMAI [69] 1995 EGFR, HER2 Japan 30 patients HER2 and EGFR up regulations were correlated with recurrence.
 LI [70] 2018 EGFR, HER2 China

56 patients

10 controls

HER2 and EGFR expressions were correlated with stage.
 KASSOUF [71] 2008 EGFR, HER2, ErbB-3, ErbB-4 Canada 248 tumors EGFR and ErbB-4 expressions were correlated with grade and survival.
RTK class II
 GONZALEZ-ROBIN [72] 2014 IGF1R USA 100 patients IGF1R expression was correlated with pT classification.
 ROCHESTER [73] 2007 IGF1R UK

40 tumor tissues

15 control tissues

IGF1R expression was correlated with pT classification.
 Metalli [74] 2010 IGF1R USA 5 patients IGF1R up regulation
 Iozzo [75] 2011 IGF1R USA 40 patients IGF1R up regulation
RTK class V
 MARZIONI [76] 2009 FGFRI, FGFR2 Italy 17 patients FGFRI, FGFR2, and bFGF up regulations
 Dueñas [77] 2015 PIK3CA, FGFR3 Spain 87 patients PIK3CA and FGFR3 mutations were correlated with grade and recurrence.
 JUANPERE [78] 2012 FGFR3, PIK3CA, KRAS, AKT1, Spain 88 patients Mutations were correlated with grade.
 KOMPIER [79] 2010 FGFR3, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA Netherlands 257 patients Mutations were correlated with grade.
 PANDITH [80] 2016 FGFR3 India 65 patients Mutation was correlated with grade and stage.
 BERTZ [81] 2014 FGFR3 Germany 61 patients Mutation was correlated with prognosis and recurrence.
 BILLEREY [82] 2013 FGFR3 France 132 patients FGFR3 mutation was correlated with pT classification.
 VAN OERS [83] 2007 FGFR3 Germany 255 patients FGFR3 mutation was correlated with grade.
 VAN OERS [84] 2009 FGFR3 UK, France 280 patients FGFR3 mutation was correlated with pT classification and prognosis.
 MHAWECH-FAUCEGLIA [85] 2006 FGFR3 USA 254 patients FGFR3 up regulation was correlated with grade and stage.
 BREYER [86] 2018 FGFR3 Germany 296 patients FGFR3 expression was correlated with grade.
 BODOOR [87] 2010 FGFR3 Jordan 130 patients FGFR3 expression was correlated with grade and stage.
 PEDREGOSA [88] 2017 FGFR3 Spain 55 patients FGFR3 expression was correlated with tumor size and survival.
 YANG [89] 2018 FGFR3 China 52 patients FGFR3 mutation was associated with better prognosis.
 ABDUL-MAKSOUD [90] 2016 FGFR1 Egypt

80 patients

80 controls

FGFR1 expression was correlated with grade and stage.
RTK classes of VIII, IX, and XIII
 MCNEIL [91] 2014 c-MET USA 183 patients Urinary MET levels were correlated with muscle invasion.
 KIM [92] 2015 c-MET, AXL, PDGFR Korea

165 patients

34 controls

Expressions were correlated with prognosis.
 CHENG [93] 2005 c-MET Taiwan 183 patients RON and MET expressions were correlated with survival.
 Abraham [94] 2006 EphA2 USA

64 tumor tissues

13 normal tissues

EphA2 expression was correlated with tumor stage.
 XIA [95] 2006 EphB4 USA 15 patients EphB4 up regulation
 Xie [96] 2017 DDR1 China 44 patients DDR1 expression was correlated with poor prognosis.
 Tsai [97] 2016 DDR2 Taiwan 340 patients DDR2 up regulation was correlated with poor prognosis, infiltrative pattern, higher grade, advanced T stage, and metastatic status.
Other tyrosine kinase receptors
 LAI [98] 2010 BDNF, TrkB Taiwan 116 tumor tissues BDNF and TrkB up regulations
 PAN [99] 2005 c-KIT USA 52 patients c-KIT up regulation
 SHAMS [100] 2013 c-KIT Egypt 120 patients c-KIT up regulation
Non-receptor tyrosine kinases
 ASAI [101] 2018 FES Japan 203 patients FES up regulation was correlated with poor prognosis.
 NOMURA [102] 2015 DYRK2 Japan 44 patients DYRK2 expression was correlated with survival.
 GUO [103] 2011 ETK USA 233 patients ETK up regulation was correlated with grade and prognosis.

Main text

RTK class I

The ERBB family includes ERBB1 (EGFR), ERBB2 (HER2), ERBB3 (HER3), and ERBB4 (HER4) that are the class I receptors of tyrosine-kinases (RTKs). The HER2/neu is involved in transduction of mitogen signals through activation of various signaling pathways such as MAP kinase, PI3 kinase, and MYC [104, 105]. The prevalence of HER2/neu over expression in BCa is one of the most elevated among human malignancies, with a range of 9 to 34% of examined cases [106, 107]. HER2 up regulation is mainly due to gene amplification which triggers intracellular pathways that promote cell proliferation, migration, and aggressiveness of tumor cells [105, 108]. Various studies have been reported that there were significant associations between tumor grade and HER-2 up regulation or gene amplification among different population of BCa patients [3236]. The pT2 tumors have a considerable amount of mutations compared with pTa/Ti tumors [109]. Protein up regulation and gene amplification of HER2/neu occur more frequently in pT2 tumors in comparison with pTa/Ti tumors which are correlated with a poor prognosis [107, 110114]. A significant high frequency of chromosome 17 polysomy (97%) and increased HER2/neu copy number (92%) were also observed in a sample of BCa patients. Polysomy 17 and HER2/neu up regulation were frequent in G3 pT2 tumors [37]. Another study has been shown that there was HER2/neu abnormality in pT2 BCa tumors before muscle invasion. Polysomy 17 and HER2/neu amplification and up regulation were correlated with advanced disease. Therefore, the HER2/neu deregulation was observed before the muscle invasion [38]. A quarter of patients experiencing cystectomy and lymphadenectomy for N0M0 staged BCa showed lymph node metastases which resulted in death among two thirds of patients [115, 116]. The chemotherapy is not efficient in metastasizing bladder malignancy, and new therapeutic modalities are required [117, 118]. It has been observed that the HER2 amplification was significantly increased in urothelial bladder tumors with lymph node metastasis compared with initial tumors. HER2 amplification was also significantly associated with poor prognosis [39]. Another study has been shown that the patients with distant metastasis had co amplifications of HER2 and MYC in a sample of BCa cases. There was also a significant correlation between HER2 or MYC amplification and high-stage (pT4) tumor [40]. It has been shown that there were significant increased levels of HER2/neu expression in a sample of malignant BCa patients compared with benign and healthy cases. There were significant correlations between HER2/neu, ploidy, SPF, and lymph node involvement [41].

About 75% of BCa patients have NMIBC that can be limited to the mucosa (Ta) or carcinoma in situ (Tis) without stromal invasion or submucosal invasion (T1). Unsaturated fat synthase (FASN) down regulation induces apoptosis and represses tumor progression and metastasis [119]. FASN can be phosphorylated by mTOR and HER2/neu which is associated with its function and cellular localization [120]. HER2/neu triggers PI3K/AKT and Ras/Raf/MAPK signaling pathways as the stimulators of FASN. It has been observed that there were significant correlations between FASN expression, tumor size, grade, recurrence, and stage. Moreover, there was a correlation between FASN and HER2/neu which had prognostic value among NMIBC patients. HER2/neu up regulated the FASN through PI3K and MAPK pathways. FASN and HER2/neu up regulations were associated with shorter RFS and poor PFS among NMIBC cases [42]. HER2 up regulation has been observed in a sample of NMIBC patients which was significantly correlated with advanced grade and stage, bigger size, and adjacent tissues invasion. HER2 positive patients had markedly lower progression-free survival in comparison with HER2 negative cases [43]. It has been reported that the over expression of ERBB2 was significantly correlated with high grade and advanced stage tumor among a group of NMIBC patients [44]. A significantly higher level of urinary HER2/neu was also observed among a sample of NMIBC patients compared with normal subjects. Moreover, HER2/neu level/urinary creatinine ratio was significantly associated with advanced tumor grade [45]. It has been reported that the patients with positive HER2 expression had significantly shorter disease-free survival compared with negative HER2 expression cases in a sample of MIBC patients. This difference was more significant in patients with advanced stage and grade who were candidates for adjuvant treatment. The HER2/neu expression was significantly associated with higher tumor grade and stage, and lymph nodes involvement. Moreover, patients with HER2 up regulation had a worse disease-specific survival compared with normal HER2 expressed patients [46]. It has been observed that the HER2 and NFkB up regulations had a key role in tumor cells resistance against chemotherapy among a sample of MIBC patients. HER2 and NFkB Over expressions were significantly correlated with poorer survival in chemotherapeutic–treated MIBC patients who were undergone cystectomy. High expression levels of NFkB were also significantly associated with drug resistance in MIBC patients. Therefore, HER2 and NFkB up regulations can be resulted in a worse prognosis in chemotherapeutic–treated MIBC patients who were undergone cystectomy [47]. Another study has been shown that there was a significant association between HER2 up regulation and CRT resistance. Targeting HER2 improves prognosis of MIBC cases that were treated with CRT-based bladder-sparing methods [48].

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUTUC) is an uncommon type with frequency of 5–10% among all urothelial carcinomas. It has been shown that there was significant association between HER2 protein up regulation, gene amplification, grade, and shorter recurrence period. HER2 positivity was more in patients over 70 years old compared with patients under 70 years old [49]. Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma is also another rare type of urothelial carcinoma that is distinguished by plasma-cell-like cancer cells [121, 122]. It has been reported that the plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma patients had HER2 protein up regulation and gene amplification [50]. Heregulin (HRG) is ligand of ERBB family of receptors that can regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation [123125]. It has been reported that the HER3 and HER4 up regulations and their initiating ligands are correlated with good prognosis among BCa patients. Patients with high HER3 and HER4 expressions had increased survival rate. There was significant HRG2b loss in invasive tumors in comparison with non-invasive tumors. Moreover, there was a significant association between (HER3 and HER4) and (HRG2 and HRG4) expressions [51]. It has been show that there were significant different levels of ErbB4 protein expressions between a sample of bladder tumors and normal margins. EGFR and HER2 were down regulated and up regulated respectively in tumor tissues in comparison with non-malignant bladder tissues [52].

EGFR functions in a dimeric structure of different EGF receptors for the signal transduction [126, 127]. Dimeric pairs are related to the concentration of both receptors and specific ligands and also the affinities between receptors [128, 129]. It has been reported that there were associations between the elevated levels of growth factors and also their receptors and tumor recurrence in a sample of BCa patients. Tumor tissues had increased levels of EGFR and related growth factors at early stages [53]. Another study has been reported that there was EGFR up regulation in invasive BCa tumors. Progression free survival rate in patients without any progression were significantly lower among EGFR positive cases [54]. It has been reported that there were associations between EGFR expression, tumor grade, and stage [55, 56]. The increased EGFR levels of expressions were significantly associated with advanced stage and overall survival rates among muscle invasive bilharzial bladder cancer (MI-BBC) patients [57]. Another study has been shown that the EGFR up regulation was significantly correlated with aneuploidy and polysomy in a sample of BCa tumors. A significant association was also observed between high expression of EGFR and P53. Moreover, up regulation was positively associated with tumor invasiveness, aneuploidy, non-papillary type, and grade. Therefore, highly expressed EGFR is typically a delayed event during BCa progression due to genomic instability [58]. EGF and five other ligands capable of binding to EGFR are among the various family-specific EGF ligands, while heregulins are the HER3 and HER4 ligands [130]. The expression levels of HER1–4 were assessed in bladder tumors, which showed that the up regulation of HER3 and/or HER4 was a protective factor against the negative outcome of HER1 and/or HER2 over expression. Over expression of either HER1 or HER2 in HER3 and HER4 down regulated tumors were correlated with decreased survival. Therefore, HER1 and HER2 over expressions resulted in poor prognosis and tumor progression only if there were HER3 and HER4 under expressions. Patients with high expression levels of HER1 but HER3 and HER4 down regulations had a poorer prognosis than those with high levels of HER1, HER3, and HER4. Furthermore, patients expressing high levels of HER2 but HER3 and HER4 down regulations had a significantly lower survival rate compared with patients with up regulated HER2, HER3, and HER4 [59].

Radical cystectomy is the standard treatment option for MIBC, however about half of these cases had tumor metastasis during 2 years [131, 132]. Patients with metastatic BCa receive systemic Cisplatin-based therapy as the first-line treatment modality, which has a poor prognosis in advanced tumor stage [133, 134]. It has been reported that the EGFR up regulation was correlated with chemo resistance in a sample of BCa patients. The S100A9 and EGFR suppressions decreased tumor cells viability and Cisplatin-resistance. Moreover, the S100A9 and EGFR up regulations were observed in MIBC patients [60]. Another study has been reported that there was a significant correlation between EGFR negative tumor and positive radio therapeutic response at 3-month check cystoscopy. Lack of radiotherapy response at 3-month check cystoscopy was an autonomous prognostic indicator for the reduced survival rate of bladder malignancy. Positive EGFR status predicted future local relapse following a previous complete radio therapeutic response [61]. It has been shown that there was EGFR up regulation in muscle invasive in comparison with lower invasive bladder tumors which were also correlated with advanced tumor stage. EGFR and TGF-α co-expression was significantly correlated with muscle invasion [62]. The EGFR up regulation can predict a poor prognosis compared with lack of EGFR expression in a sub population of MIBC patients. There was also a significant association between EGFR over expression and tumor relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced BCa, which introduced EGFR as a useful prognostic marker of BCa [63]. It has been shown that some high-grade bladder tumor patients had increased urinary level of EGFR. EGFR levels in urine can be used as a predictor of survival [64]. The EGFR 3′UTR 774 T > C polymorphism can be associated with higher risk of BCa progression. Patients with EGFR 774CC genotype were significantly more susceptible to BCa in comparison with 774TT/TC genotype [65]. There was also a significant correlation regarding EGFR_03 and EGFR_05 variants with a higher risk of BCa progression, and EGFR_05 and EGFR_1808 variants with a prolonged survival. EGFR_03 and EGFR_05 polymorphisms were correlated with higher BCa risk. Patients with polymorphic EGFR alleles showed higher survival rate than patients with wild-type EGFR. However, mutated type of the EGF_04 ligand showed lower survival rate than wild-type [66].

Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MPUC) is an aggressive urothelial cancer with poor prognosis which is due to the high tendency of tumor for lymphovascular invasion. Majority of the MPUC patients have a high grade and stage tumor at the time of diagnosis [135]. It has been shown that there was a significant EGFR up regulation in a sample of MPUC patients [67]. Tumors with muscle invasion (stage T2-T4) showed a significant higher progression and metastasis, with decreased 5-year survival rates. Cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix signals are mainly transmitted through tyrosine-kinases that results in alteration of cell differentiation, motility, attachment, and apoptosis [17]. It has been reported that there were HER2 and EGFR up regulations in a sample of BCa in comparison with typical urothelium. The HER2 and EGFR over expressions had an important role in the early stages of tumor progression. Moreover, there were significant correlations between HER2 expression and HER2 and EGFR coexpression in patients with T1 disease [68]. It has been reported that there was a significant association between nuclear positivity of c-MYC and HER2 up regulation among a group of transitional cell BCa patients. Cytoplasmic c-MYC expression was also correlated with grade, papillary status, and EGFR/HER2 up regulation [136]. EGFR- and/or HER2 up regulation has been also reported to have a significant association with higher frequency of recurrence in BCa patients [69]. It has been observed that there was a significant positive association between HER2 and EGFR expressions in a sub population of transitional BCa patients. Bladder tumor cells had significantly higher levels of EGFR and HER2 expressions compared with controls. Patients with advanced tumor grade and stage, and tumor relapse had significant increased expression of EGFR in comparison with patients with lower grade and stage of tumor, and lack of recurrence. Patients with advance stages and tumor relapse also showed increased levels of HER2 expression compared with recurrence free patients with lower tumor stages [70]. It has been shown that the EGFR up regulation and ErbB4 down regulation were significantly correlated with tumor aggressiveness, advance grade, and poor overall survival in a sub population of BCa patients. The patients with EGFR down regulation had higher recurrence-free survival in comparison with patients with EGFR up regulation. Patients without ErbB4 down regulation had better 5-year overall survival and were more likely to have small, low-grade, and non-invasive tumors [71].

RTK class II

Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) is belonged to the class II RTKs which have pivotal functions in regulation of cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and differentiation. IGF-IR has an anti-apoptotic function during tumor progression [137]. It has been shown that the IGF1R expression was correlated with the race and pT classification in malignant UC cases. There was a negative association between pT classification and IGF1R expression in which the IGF1R over expression was less in pT4 cases compared with lower pT categories. IGF1R over expression was significantly correlated with mortality which can be introduced as a prognostic factor of BCa [72]. Another study has been reported that there was significant IGF1R over expression in a sample of BCa tissues compared with healthy urothelium. Both invasive and superficial (Ta–T1) bladder tumors had higher expression levels of IGF1R compared with normal bladder tissue [73]. It has been observed that the IGF-IR promotes bladder tumor cells migration and invasion through AKT-ERK related activation of Paxillin. Since, phosphorylated Paxillin colocalizes with FAK in focal adhesion in migrating cells, Paxillin suppression reduced the invasion of 5637 and T24 cell lines. There was also IGF-IR up regulation in a sample of invasive BCa tissues compared with normal margins [74]. Decorin is belonged to the small leucine-rich proteoglycans involved in tumor progression via RTKs suppression [75, 138]. It has been shown that there were significant IGF-IR over expression in high grade in comparison with low grade BCa samples. There was also an inverse correlation between the levels of decorin and IGF-IR expressions in BCa. Moreover, Decorin suppressed tumor cell invasion through IGF-IR inhibition [139].

RTK class V

Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) is a cationic protein that binds with heparin and is involved in angiogenesis and tumor progression. The basic FGFR is belonged to the class V of RTKs, and syndecans are essential for its activation. Ligand binding causes FGFR dimerization, which leads to the kinase domain autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of effector signaling proteins. Syndecans binding with both bFGF and their FGFRs functions as stimulators while syndecans that bind only bFGF operate as signaling inhibitors. It has been shown that there were significant FGFRI, FGFR2, bFGF, and syndecan1–4 up regulations in a sample of BCa tissues [76]. Different changes and variations have been detected in the members of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway in urinary BCa [140, 141]. This pathway has key roles in regulation of cellular growth and survival [142]. It has been reported that the PIK3CA mutations and amplification were a preliminary and prevalent occurrence among NMIBC patients which were correlated with reduced tumor relapse. In low-grade tumors there was also a correlation between PIK3CA and FGFR3 mutations. Moreover, patients with wt PIK3CA and FGFR3 mutated tumors had significantly higher recurrence rates. An exceptionally high rate of PIK3CA mutations and gene amplifications were particularly found in T1 and T2 tumors. Mutations and amplifications in PIK3CA induced AKT function [77]. PI3K can be activated by FGFR or ERBB through the binding of RAS to PIK3CA. It has been shown that the majority of UCC cases had mutations in PIK3CA, FGFR3, HRAS, KRAS, BRAF, and AKT1 genes. Mutations were significantly more frequent in FGFR3, PIK3CA, and FGFR3. The frequencies of mutations were negatively associated with grade. FGFR3mut and FGFR3mut- PIK3CAmut genotypes were correlated with low grade tumors, while the KRASmut- PIK3CAmut- and AKT1mut were observed in high-grade tumors [78]. Another study has been shown that the majority of patients with low-grade NMI-BC had a mutation in KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, PIK3CA, and FGFR3 genes. Therefore, mutational analysis of these genes along with regular cystoscopic examinations can be an efficient method of following-up among patients with grade 1–2 NMI-BC [79]. It has been observed that there was significant correlations between mutated FGFR3 and lower tumor stage/grade [80]. BCa patients with mutated FGFR3 had higher rate of vascularization in comparison with wild-type FGFR3. FVIII up regulation was the only angiogenic factor associated with mutated FGFR3. The T1 MIBC patients with mutated FGFR3 had significantly higher risk of recurrence compared with wild-type FGFR3 carriers. FGFR3 was also a poor prognostic factor and promoted tumor angiogenesis. Therefore, FGFR3-targeted therapies can be effective in reducing tumor angiogenesis [81]. Most of bladder tumors (75–80%) are papillary noninvasive (pTa) or superficially invasive (pT1) urothelial tumors, whereas the others (20–25%) are muscle-invasive (pT2). FGFR3 mutations are more common in pTa bladder tumors [82, 143, 144], less regular in pT1G3 tumors [145, 146], and rare in carcinoma in situ (pTis) [82, 146]. The BCa patients with a FGFR3 mutation appeared to have a better outcome compared with mutation free patients [144]. It has been reported that the FGFR3 and CK20 were efficient prognostic factors of pTa bladder tumors, since it can distinguish the differentiated tumors with FGFR3 mutations. The FGFR3 mutation with a normal CK20 expression pattern was observed in low-grade non-invasive papillary tumors [83]. It has been observed that the FGFR3 mutations were significantly more common in pTa BCa tumors. The patients with mutant FGFR3 had significantly lower death rate. The FGFR3 mutations can precisely determine patients with invasive tumor who were at lower risk of progression. The carriers of FGFR3 mutations had better prognosis [84]. Another study has been shown that the prevalence of FGFR3 mutation was significantly higher in pTa tumors compared with carcinoma in situ (CIS), pT1, and pT2–4 among a sub population of BCa patients. There were also significant correlations between FGFR3 mutations and low grade tumors [82]. It has been reported that the FGFR3 up regulation was more common in well-differentiated in comparison with poorly-differentiated tumors and in low stage tumors in comparison with advance stage tumors among BCa patients. There were significant associations between loss of FGFR3, stage, and grade [85]. A negative association was also reported between the levels of FGFR3 expression and grade. There was also significant inverse correlation between CDKN2A/p16 and FGFR3 expressions. CDKN2A/p16 up regulation and FGFR3 down regulation were significantly associated with poor progression-free survival [86]. MAP kinase, STAT1, PI3K-AKT, and PLCγ are important signaling pathways to mediate the FGFR3 functions [147149]. It has been shown that there was a declining trend of FGFR3 expression from pTa toward pT3 cases in a sample of BCa cases. FGFR3 was also positive in 45, 26, and 30% of G1, G2 and G3 cases, respectively. Moreover, there was association between mutation and FGFR3 over expression which were frequent in primary stage (pTa and pT1) and low grade (G1 and G2) BCa tumors [87]. It has been shown that there was FGFR3 up regulation in a sample of BCa tumor tissues compared with normal mucosa. Tumor size was also correlated with FGFR3 expression. Moreover, the up regulations of FGFR3, PI3Kp110, PI3KClassIII, and AKT were also correlated with recurrence free survival among T1 BCa patients [88]. ERCC1 over expression and FGFR3 mutation were associated with a better response to the non-adjuvant chemotherapy in a group of MIBC patients [89]. It has been shown that the mRNA levels of FGFR1 and CK20 were significantly higher in BCa tissues in comparison with normal margins. The invasive tumors had significantly higher levels of FGFR1 and CK20 expressions compared with non-invasive tumors. FGFR1 or CK20 were sensitive markers to separate the invasive and non-invasive tumors. The levels of FGFR1 and CK20 expressions were significantly higher in invasive tumors (pT2-pT4) compared with non-invasive tumors (pTis, pTa, and pT1). The expression levels of FGFR1 and CK20 were also correlated with stage and grade [90].

RTK classes of VIII, IX, and XIII

Tumor is limited to the mucosal layer in almost 70% of the new BCa cases. The rest of patients have an advanced tumor stages with local lymph node involvement, muscles invasion, and distant metastases at the time of diagnosis. About 50% of the MIBC patients does not respond to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgical resection which results in a survival time lower than 5 years [116, 150]. The gold standard treatment option for BCa patients with distant metastases is the Platinum-based chemotherapy which has a 15% of 5-year survival rate and a median survival of 15 months [151]. MET is a cell surface RTK mainly produced in epithelial cells. MET signaling is critical for normal cellular development and homeostasis; however, it has also been shown to be involved in invasive tumors and distant metastasis [152]. It has been reported that the urinary MET levels could be an efficient marker of differentiating between BCa patients and healthy subjects, and also differentiating between MIBC and NMIBC patients [91]. Although, pharmaceutical inhibition of the RTK pathway function using Gefitinib had modest outcomes, it remains the gold standard treatment for BCa patients [153, 154]. The activation of c-MET by hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) worsen the malignant features of tumor cells which results in a higher rate of cells motility, proliferation, metastasis, and invasion [155]. Activation of c-MET induces other signaling proteins such as GRB2, GAB1, SHC, PLC1, and PI3-K [156]. Microarray analysis on RTK indicated that the PDGFR and AXL have interaction with c-MET [157]. It has been reported that the lack of c-MET expression renders less aggressiveness and more Cisplatin response in BCa. In contrast, c-MET up regulation had a significant association with worse clinical outcome and shorter overall survival among MIBC patients. The PDGFRL up regulation was also significantly correlated with a poorer prognosis. Moreover, NMIBC patients had an increased levels of AXL and PDGFR expressions compared with MIBC patients [92]. Recepteur d’Origine Nantais (RON) is a particular receptor tyrosine-kinase in the MET family [158]. It has been shown that there were correlations between RON or MET expressions and tumor aggressiveness and reduced survival. RON up regulation promoted the cell proliferation and migration. RON expression was also directly correlated with grade, size, and tumor stage among BCa patients. Moreover, RON/MET expression was correlated with reduced overall survival [93]. The Eph receptor is belonged to the RTK family that is regulated by ephrin ligands. Eph-ephrin interaction is associated with cell migration and neoplastic transformation [159]. It has been reported that there was a significant EphA2 up regulation in a sample of urothelial tumors compared with normal tissues. The levels of EphA2 expression was also significantly correlated with tumor stage. Moreover, there was a converse correlation between E-cadherin and EphA2 expressions in advanced tumor stages [94]. EphB4 is a member of the Eph receptors which has key functions in angiogenesis, neural development, and pattern formation [160163]. EphB4 and its specific ligand, EphrinB2, are both transmembrane proteins that are typically expressed on venous and arterial endothelium, respectively. Deregulation of EphB4 has been demonstrated in various tumors of breast, prostate, and lung [164167]. Activation of EphB4 regulates cell attachment and migration [168171]. Frequent EphB4 up regulation was reported among a sample of BCa patients. While, majority of tumor tissues showed a high expression of EphB4, normal urothelial cells displayed very little or lack of EphB4 expression. P53 is a regulator of EphB4 via MAPK and PI3K signaling pathways. EphB4 was up regulated by PI3K/AKT pathway. The EphB4 suppression also reduced tumor cells invasion which can be due to MMP9 down regulation. Moreover, they observed BCL-XL down regulation following the EphB4 knockdown in BCa cells. Therefore, EphB4 suppression reduced tumor progression and increased apoptosis [95]. Discoidin domain receptors (DDRs) are a class of RTKs which are activated by collagens. DDR1 can be activated by most collagen types, whereas DDR2 can be activated only by type I and III collagens [172]. The collagen-DDR1 binding increases the self-renewal and migration of non-cancerous cells [173, 174]. A high level of DDR1 in solid malignant tumors was associated with poor prognosis [175]. It has been reported that there was a significant increased levels of DDR1 expression in BCa tissues which was associated with poor prognosis. DDR1 activation also increased tumor invasion through ZEB1 and SLUG up regulations in bladder tumor cells [96]. DDR2 promotes the EMT through the ECM blockade. The activated DDR2 becomes docking sites for adaptor proteins, resulting in the MMP2 up-regulation [176]. It has been observed that there was a significant DDR2 up regulation in a sample of urothelial carcinoma patients which was associated with poor prognosis, infiltrative pattern, higher grade, advanced T stage, and metastatic status [97].

Other tyrosine-kinase receptors

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a member of the neurotrophin family of growth factors associated with neural differentiation and survival through binding to the Tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrKB) [177]. BDNF/TrKB pathway has been reported to be involved in different solid cancers such as lung, prostate, and pancreatic ducts [178180]. It has been observed that there were increased levels of BDNF and TrKB expressions among a sub population of transitional cell carcinomas (TCC) patients compared with healthy subjects. However, differences were significant in grade 3 TCC for BDNF expression, and in grade 1 and 3 TCC for TrKB expression. Therefore, TrKB and/or BDNF up regulation can be introduced as efficient markers of early detection among BCa patients [98]. C-KIT is a tyrosine-kinase receptor involving in carcinogenesis and hematopoiesis [181, 182]. The c-KIT up regulation has been reported in various cancers such as gastrointestinal, lung, and breast cancers [183185]. Since, c-KIT up regulation has been observed in a marked population of a sample of small cell BCa patients, c-KIT targeted therapies can be an effective therapeutic method among these patients [99]. The c-KIT has key developmental functions and mainly expressed in melanocytes, interstitial cells of Cajal, erythroid and mast cell lineages [186188]. The prevalence of c-KIT mutation and its expression levels were assessed in a sub population of bladder SCC patients which showed c-KIT up regulation in majority of cases. Bilharzial ova positive patients also showed a significantly higher expression levels of c-KIT compared with Bilharzial ova negative cases [100].

Non-receptor tyrosine-kinases

Feline Sarcoma (FES) and FES-related protein (FER) are a separate sub-family of non-receptor tyrosine-kinases [189]. Down regulation of FES represses the progression of renal cell carcinoma cells [190]. It was also shown that the increased FES expression was associated with a more aggressive tumor and shorter recurrence-free survival following surgical resection [191]. The FES was significantly down regulated in tumor cells compared with normal urothelial cells. A positive association was also observed between FES expression level and tumor cells invasion in patients with high-grade tumors. Moreover, FES up regulation was determined as a negative prognostic predictor of metastasis after radical surgery in patients with high-grade malignancies [101]. Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinases (DYRKs) constitute a subfamily of protein kinases which have the ability to phosphorylate aromatic (tyrosine) besides aliphatic (serine and threonine) residues [192194]. DYRKs are involved in regulation of cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival [195, 196]. DYRK2 stimulates cell apoptosis following DNA damages by p53 phosphorylation during genotoxic stress [197]. It has been reported that there was a significant correlation between DYRK2 over expression and higher disease-specific survival among chemotherapeutic-treated T1 high-grade and T2 BCa patients. Therefore, assessing the levels of DYRK2 could be a predictive factor to detect patients with T1 high-grade and T2 BCa that will probably show a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment [102]. Epithelial and endothelial tyrosine-kinase (ETK) is a family of non-receptor tyrosine-kinases which can be activated by cytokines, hormones, growth factors, and ECM [198]. ETK is involved in regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, motility, and survival. It has been reported that the ETK levels rises gradually during the BCa progression. There were also significant correlations between ETK up regulation, higher tumor grade, and poor prognosis. Suppression of ETK in bladder tumors reduced activity of AKT and STAT3. Therefore, the ETK over expression can be the reason of increased AKT and STAT3 activity in bladder tumors [103].

Conclusions

It was observed that the class I and V of RTKs were the most reported tyrosine-kinases among BCa patients in the world. This review highlights the importance of tyrosine-kinases as critical markers in early detection and therapeutic purposes among BCa patients and clarifies the molecular biology of tyrosine-kinases during BCa progression and metastasis.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Abbreviations

BCa

Bladder cancer

US

United States

NMIBC

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

MIBC

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer

TKs

Tyrosine-kinases

EGFR

Epidermal growth factor receptor

PDGFR

Platelet-derived growth factor receptor

VEGFR

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

FGFR

Fibroblast growth factor receptor

HGFR

Hepatocyte growth factor receptor

TKIs

Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors

RTKs

Receptors of tyrosine-kinases

FASN

Fat synthase

UUTUC

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

HRG

Heregulin

MPUC

Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma

IGF1R

Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor

bFGF

Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor

CIS

Carcinoma in situ

HGF

Hepatocyte growth factor

RON

Recepteur d’Origine Nantais

BDNF

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

TCC

Transitional cell carcinomas

FES

Feline Sarcoma

FER

FES-related protein

ETK

Epithelial and endothelial tyrosine-kinase

PI3K

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

DDRs

Discoidin domain receptors

Authors’ contributions

ASZ, AHB, HRR, and MMojarrad were involved in search strategy and drafting. MMoghbeli supervised the project and revised and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Amir Sadra Zangouei, Email: sadra.zangouei@outlook.com.

Amir Hossein Barjasteh, Email: Barjastehah961@mums.ac.ir.

Hamid Reza Rahimi, Email: rahimihr@mums.ac.ir.

Majid Mojarrad, Email: mojaradm@mums.ac.ir.

Meysam Moghbeli, Email: moghbelim@mums.ac.ir, Email: Meysam_moghbeli@yahoo.com.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12964-020-00625-7.

References

  • 1.Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Antoni S, et al. Bladder cancer incidence and mortality: a global overview and recent trends. Eur Urol. 2017;71(1):96–108. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taylor JA, Kuchel GA. Bladder cancer in the elderly: clinical outcomes, basic mechanisms, and future research direction. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2009;6(3):135–144. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lombard AP, Mudryj M. The emerging role of the androgen receptor in bladder cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22(5):R265–R277. doi: 10.1530/ERC-15-0209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Volanis D, et al. Environmental factors and genetic susceptibility promote urinary bladder cancer. Toxicol Lett. 2010;193(2):131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mojarrad M, Moghbeli M. Genetic and molecular biology of bladder cancer among Iranian patients. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;1:e1233. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Feldman AS. Bladder cancer. Lancet. 2009;374(9685):239–249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60491-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sanli O, et al. Bladder cancer. Lancet. 2017;3(1):1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martinez Rodriguez RH, Buisan Rueda O, Ibarz L. Bladder cancer: present and future. Med Clin (Barc) 2017;149(10):449–455. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2017.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vasekar M, Degraff D, Joshi M. Immunotherapy in bladder cancer. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2016;9(3):242–251. doi: 10.2174/1874467208666150716120945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martin-Doyle W, Kwiatkowski DJ. Molecular biology of bladder cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2015;29(2):191–203. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2014.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Manning G, et al. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science. 2002;298(5600):1912–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.1075762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hubbard MJ, Cohen P. On target with a new mechanism for the regulation of protein phosphorylation. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993;18(5):172–177. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(93)90109-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nattel S, et al. Arrhythmogenic ion-channel remodeling in the heart: heart failure, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(2):425–456. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00014.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hanks SK, Hunter T. Protein kinases 6. The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. FASEB J. 1995;9(8):576–596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Robinson DR, Wu Y-M, Lin S-F. The protein tyrosine kinase family of the human genome. Oncogene. 2000;19(49):5548–5557. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pusztai L, et al. Growth factors: regulation of normal and neoplastic growth. J Pathol. 1993;169(2):191–201. doi: 10.1002/path.1711690204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moghbeli M, et al. Association of PYGO2 and EGFR in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Med Oncol. 2013;30(2):516. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0516-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moghbeli M, et al. ErbB1 and ErbB3 co-over expression as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Biol Res. 2019;52(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40659-018-0208-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Krause DS, Van Etten RA. Tyrosine kinases as targets for cancer therapy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(2):172–187. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra044389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lahiry P, et al. Kinase mutations in human disease: interpreting genotype–phenotype relationships. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(1):60–74. doi: 10.1038/nrg2707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Karpov OA, et al. Receptor tyrosine kinase structure and function in health and disease. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mitra AP, Cote RJ. Molecular pathogenesis and diagnostics of bladder cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2009;4:251–285. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McDonell LM, et al. Receptor tyrosine kinase mutations in developmental syndromes and cancer: two sides of the same coin. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(R1):R60–R66. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hänze J, et al. Effects of multi and selective targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors on function and signaling of different bladder cancer cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;106:316–325. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.06.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim SH, et al. Bgj398, a pan-fgfr inhibitor, overcomes paclitaxel resistance in urothelial carcinoma with fgfr1 overexpression. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):3164. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Agarwal PK, et al. Emerging drugs for targeted therapy of bladder cancer. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2007;12(3):435–448. doi: 10.1517/14728214.12.3.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alonso-Gordoa T, et al. Targeting tyrosine kinases in renal cell carcinoma:“new bullets against old guys”. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(8):1901. doi: 10.3390/ijms20081901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li Q, et al. MicroRNAs: key players in bladder cancer. Mol Diagn Ther. 2019;23(5):579–601. doi: 10.1007/s40291-019-00410-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Soria F, et al. Molecular markers in bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2019;37(1):31–40. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2503-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coombs L, et al. Immunocytochemical localization of c-erbB-2 protein in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. J Pathol. 1993;169(1):35–42. doi: 10.1002/path.1711690107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Simon R, et al. HER-2 and TOP2A coamplification in urinary bladder cancer. Int J Cancer. 2003;107(5):764–772. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nadoushan MRJ, et al. Overexpression of HER-2/neu oncogene and transitional cell carcinoma of bladder. Urol J. 2009;4(3):151–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Krüger S, et al. HER2 overexpression in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: prognostic implications. Int J Cancer. 2002;102(5):514–518. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Coogan CL, et al. HER-2/neu protein overexpression and gene amplification in human transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Urology. 2004;63(4):786–790. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Latif Z, et al. HER2/neu gene amplification and protein overexpression in G3 pT2 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a role for anti-HER2 therapy? Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(1):56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Latif Z, et al. HER2/neu overexpression in the development of muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(7):1305–1309. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fleischmann A, et al. Her2 amplification is significantly more frequent in lymph node metastases from urothelial bladder cancer than in the primary tumours. Eur Urol. 2011;60(2):350–357. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hansel DE, et al. HER2 overexpression and amplification in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is associated with MYC coamplification in a subset of cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130(2):74–281. doi: 10.1309/41VLTFX3YPP1HF6F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Eissa S, et al. HER2/neu expression in bladder cancer: relationship to cell cycle kinetics. Clin Biochem. 2005;38(2):142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abdelrahman AE, et al. Fatty acid synthase, Her2/neu, and E2F1 as prognostic markers of progression in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019;39:42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ding W, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: a significant indicator for predicting progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer especially in high-risk groups. World J Urol. 2015;33(12):1951–1957. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1557-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Breyer J, et al. ESR1, ERBB2, and Ki67 mRNA expression predicts stage and grade of non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC) Virchows Arch. 2016;469(5):547–552. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-2002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Arikan O, et al. Clinical significance of serum and urinary HER2/neu protein levels in primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41(6):1080–1087. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kolla SB, et al. Prognostic significance of Her2/neu overexpression in patients with muscle invasive urinary bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(2):321–327. doi: 10.1007/s11255-007-9283-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Koga F, et al. ErbB2 and NFκB overexpression as predictors of chemoradiation resistance and putative targets to overcome resistance in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Inoue M, et al. Significance of ERBB2 overexpression in therapeutic resistance and cancer-specific survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with chemoradiation-based selective bladder-sparing approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(2):303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sasaki Y, et al. HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma-an analysis of 171 patients. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(2):699. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kim B, et al. HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification in plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Dis Markers. 2016;2016:1. doi: 10.1155/2016/8463731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Memon AA, et al. Expression of HER3, HER4 and their ligand heregulin-4 is associated with better survival in bladder cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2004;91(12):2034–2041. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gunes S, et al. ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase family expression levels in urothelial bladder carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2013;209(2):99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2012.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Turkeri LN, et al. Impact of the expression of epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor alpha, and epidermal growth factor receptor on the prognosis of superficial bladder cancer. Urology. 1998;51(4):645–649. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00648-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Popov Z, et al. Urologic oncology: seminars and original investigations. 2004. Prognostic value of EGF receptor and tumor cell proliferation in bladder cancer: therapeutic implications. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Arfaoui AT, et al. Prognostic value of immunohistochemical expression profile of epidermal growth factor receptor in urothelial bladder cancer. J Immunoass Immunochem. 2016;37(4):359–367. doi: 10.1080/15321819.2016.1146757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Berger M, et al. Evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptors in bladder tumours. Br J Cancer. 1987;56(5):533–537. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Khaled HM, et al. Clinical significance of altered nm23-H1, EGFR, RB and p53 expression in bilharzial bladder cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lipponen P, Eskelinen M. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in bladder cancer as related to established prognostic factors, oncoprotein (c-erb B-2, p53) expression and long-term prognosis. Br J Cancer. 1994;69(6):1120–1125. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Memon AA, et al. The relation between survival and expression of HER1 and HER2 depends on the expression of HER3 and HER4: a study in bladder cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(11):1703–1709. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kim W, et al. S100A9 and EGFR gene signatures predict disease progression in muscle invasive bladder cancer patients after chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(5):974–979. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Colquhoun A, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor status predicts local response to radical radiotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Clin Oncol. 2006;18(9):702–709. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Thøgersen V, et al. Expression of transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor in human bladder cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59(4):267–277. doi: 10.1080/00365519950185634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mansour AM, et al. Epidermal growth factor expression as a predictor of chemotherapeutic resistance in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BMC Urol. 2018;18(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0413-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bryan RT, et al. Protein shedding in urothelial bladder cancer: prognostic implications of soluble urinary EGFR and EpCAM. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(6):1052–1058. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chu H, et al. EGFR 3’ UTR 774T> C polymorphism contributes to bladder cancer risk. Mutagenesis. 2013;28(1):49–55. doi: 10.1093/mutage/ges051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mason RA, et al. EGFR pathway polymorphisms and bladder cancer susceptibility and prognosis. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(7):1155–1160. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Li J, et al. Comparison of tyrosine kinase receptors HER2, EGFR, and VEGFR expression in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma with invasive urothelial carcinoma. Target Oncol. 2015;10(3):355–363. doi: 10.1007/s11523-014-0341-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rajjayabun PH, et al. erbB receptor expression patterns in human bladder cancer. Urology. 2005;66(1):196–200. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.01.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Imai T, et al. Significance of epidermal growth factor receptor and c-erb B-2 protein expression in transitional cell cancer of the upper urinary tract for tumour recurrence at the urinary bladder. Br J Cancer. 1995;71(1):69–72. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Li W, et al. Overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER-2 in bladder carcinoma and its association with patients’ clinical features. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:7178. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kassouf W, et al. Distinctive expression pattern of ErbB family receptors signifies an aggressive variant of bladder cancer. J Urol. 2008;179(1):353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gonzalez-Roibon N, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor overexpression is associated with outcome in invasive urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder: a retrospective study of patients treated using radical cystectomy. Urology. 2014;83(6):1444.e1–1444.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rochester MA, et al. The type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor is over-expressed in bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2007;100(6):1396–1401. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Metalli D, et al. The insulin-like growth factor receptor I promotes motility and invasion of bladder cancer cells through Akt- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent activation of paxillin. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(6):2997–3006. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Proteoglycans in health and disease: novel regulatory signaling mechanisms evoked by the small leucine-rich proteoglycans. FEBS J. 2010;277(19):3864–3875. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07797.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Marzioni D, et al. Expression of basic fibroblast growth factor, its receptors and syndecans in bladder cancer. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009;22(3):627–638. doi: 10.1177/039463200902200308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Duenas M, et al. PIK3CA gene alterations in bladder cancer are frequent and associate with reduced recurrence in non-muscle invasive tumors. Mol Carcinog. 2015;54(7):566–576. doi: 10.1002/mc.22125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Juanpere N, et al. Mutations in FGFR3 and PIK3CA, singly or combined with RAS and AKT1, are associated with AKT but not with MAPK pathway activation in urothelial bladder cancer. Hum Pathol. 2012;43(10):1573–1582. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kompier LC, et al. FGFR3, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS and PIK3CA mutations in bladder cancer and their potential as biomarkers for surveillance and therapy. PLoS One. 2010;5:11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pandith AA, et al. Oncogenic activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 and RAS genes as non-overlapping mutual exclusive events in urinary bladder cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(6):2787–2793. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Bertz S, et al. Increased angiogenesis and FGFR protein expression indicate a favourable prognosis in bladder cancer. Virchows Arch. 2014;465(6):687–695. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1672-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Billerey C, et al. Frequent FGFR3 mutations in papillary non-invasive bladder (pTa) tumors. Am J Pathol. 2001;158(6):1955–1959. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64665-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.van Oers JM, et al. FGFR3 mutations and a normal CK20 staining pattern define low-grade noninvasive urothelial bladder tumours. Eur Urol. 2007;52(3):760–768. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.van Oers JM, et al. FGFR3 mutations indicate better survival in invasive upper urinary tract and bladder tumours. Eur Urol. 2009;55(3):650–657. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Mhawech-Fauceglia P, et al. FGFR3 and p53 protein expressions in patients with pTa and pT1 urothelial bladder cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO) 2006;32(2):231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Breyer J, et al. High CDKN2A/p16 and low FGFR3 expression predict progressive potential of stage pT1 urothelial bladder carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16(4):248–256. e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bodoor K, et al. FGFR3 mutational status and protein expression in patients with bladder cancer in a Jordanian population. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010;34(6):724–732. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pedregosa AB, et al. Expresión de las proteínas FGFR3, PI3K, AKT, p21Waf1/Cip1 y ciclinas D1 y D3 en pacientes con tumores de vejiga T1: implicaciones clínicas y significado pronóstico. Actas Urol Esp. 2017;41(3):172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2016.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Yang Z, et al. Somatic FGFR3 mutations distinguish a subgroup of muscle-invasive bladder cancers with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. EBioMedicine. 2018;35:198–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Abdul-Maksoud RS, et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 and cytokeratin 20 expressions and their relation to prognostic variables in bladder cancer. Gene. 2016;591(2):320–326. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.McNeil BK, et al. Preliminary evaluation of urinary soluble met as a biomarker for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. J Transl Med. 2014;12(1):199. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kim Y-W, et al. The c-MET network as novel prognostic marker for predicting bladder cancer patients with an increased risk of developing aggressive disease. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0134552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Cheng H-L, et al. Co-expression of RON and MET is a prognostic indicator for patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(10):1906–1914. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Abraham S, et al. Expression of EphA2 and Ephrin A-1 in carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(2):353–360. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Xia G, et al. EphB4 receptor tyrosine kinase is expressed in bladder cancer and provides signals for cell survival. Oncogene. 2006;25(5):769–780. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Xie X, et al. Discoidin domain receptor 1 activity drives an aggressive phenotype in bladder cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2017;9(5):2500–2507. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Tsai MC, et al. DDR2 overexpression in urothelial carcinoma indicates an unfavorable prognosis: a large cohort study. Oncotarget. 2016;7(48):78918–78931. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Lai PC, Chiu TH, Huang YT. Overexpression of BDNF and TrkB in human bladder cancer specimens. Oncol Rep. 2010;24(5):1265–1270. doi: 10.3892/or_00000981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Pan C-X, et al. C-kit expression in small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: prognostic and therapeutic implications. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(3):320–323. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Shams TM, Metawea M, Salim EI. C-KIT positive Schistosomal urinary bladder carcinomas are frequent but lack KIT gene mutations. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(1):15–20. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Asai A, et al. Pathological significance and prognostic significance of FES expression in bladder cancer vary according to tumor grade. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(1):21–31. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2524-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Nomura S, et al. Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 2 (DYRK2) as a novel marker in T1 high-grade and T2 bladder cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Urol. 2015;15(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0040-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Guo S, et al. Tyrosine kinase ETK/BMX is up-regulated in bladder cancer and predicts poor prognosis in patients with cystectomy. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Hynes NE, Lane HA. Myc and mammary cancer: Myc is a downstream effector of the ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2001;6(1):141–150. doi: 10.1023/a:1009528918064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Hudis CA. Trastuzumab—mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(1):39–51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Coombs LM, et al. Amplification and over-expression of c-erbB-2 in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Br J Cancer. 1991;63(4):601–608. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Sato K, et al. An immunohistologic evaluation of C-erbB-2 gene product in patients with urinary bladder carcinoma. Cancer. 1992;70(10):2493–2498. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19921115)70:10<2493::aid-cncr2820701017>3.0.co;2-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Wolff AC, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2014;138(2):241–256. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0953-SA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Reznikoff CA, et al. Urologic oncology: seminars and original investigations. 2000. Genetic alterations and biological pathways in human bladder cancer pathogenesis. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Mellon JK, et al. C-erbB-2 in bladder cancer: molecular biology, correlation with epidermal growth factor receptors and prognostic value. J Urol. 1996;155(1):321–326. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66653-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Miyamoto H, et al. C-ERBB-2 gene amplification as a prognostic marker in human bladder cancer. Urology. 2000;55(5):679–683. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00604-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Moriyama M, et al. Expression of c-erbB-2 gene product in urinary bladder cancer. J Urol. 1991;145(2):423–427. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38356-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Sauter G, et al. Heterogeneity of erbB-2 gene amplification in bladder cancer. Cancer Res. 1993;53(10):2199–2203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Underwood M, et al. C-erbB-2 gene amplification: a molecular marker in recurrent bladder tumors? Cancer Res. 1995;55(11):2422–2430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Fleischmann A, et al. Extracapsular extension of pelvic lymph node metastases from urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is an independent prognostic factor. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(10):2358–2365. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Stein JP, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(3):666–675. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Garcia JA, Dreicer R. Systemic chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer: update and controversies. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(35):5545–5551. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.0564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Marín ÁP, et al. Role of anti-her-2 therapy in bladder carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136(12):1915–1920. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0850-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Grube S, et al. Overexpression of fatty acid synthase in human gliomas correlates with the WHO tumor grade and inhibition with orlistat reduces cell viability and triggers apoptosis. J Neuro-Oncol. 2014;118(2):277–287. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1452-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Jensen-Urstad AP, et al. Nutrient-dependent phosphorylation channels lipid synthesis to regulate PPARα. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(7):1848–1859. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M036103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Lopez-Beltran A, et al. Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Hum Pathol. 2009;40(7):1023–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ro JY, et al. Plasmacytoid transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder: a clinicopathologic study of 9 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(5):752–757. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318159af9e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Burden S, Yarden Y. Neuregulins and their receptors: a versatile signaling module in organogenesis and oncogenesis. Neuron. 1997;18(6):847–855. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80324-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Le X-F, et al. Anti-HER2 antibody and heregulin suppress growth of HER2-overexpressing human breast cancer cells through different mechanisms. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6(1):260–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Le X-F, Varela C, Bast R. Heregulin-induced apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2002;7(6):483–491. doi: 10.1023/a:1020682807922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Olayioye MA, et al. The ErbB signaling network: receptor heterodimerization in development and cancer. EMBO J. 2000;19(13):3159–3167. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.13.3159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2(2):127–137. doi: 10.1038/35052073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Tzahar E, et al. Bivalence of EGF-like ligands drives the ErbB signaling network. EMBO J. 1997;16(16):4938–4950. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.16.4938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Pinkas-Kramarski R, et al. Diversification of Neu differentiation factor and epidermal growth factor signaling by combinatorial receptor interactions. EMBO J. 1996;15(10):2452–2467. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Guy PM, et al. Insect cell-expressed p180erbB3 possesses an impaired tyrosine kinase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(17):8132–8136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.8132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Rosenberg JE, Carroll PR, Small EJ. Update on chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer. J Urol. 2005;174(1):14–20. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000162039.38023.5f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Sternberg C. The treatment of advanced bladder cancer. Ann Oncol. 1995;6(2):113–126. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Saxman SB, et al. Long-term follow-up of a phase III intergroup study of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(7):2564–2569. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.von der Maase H, et al. Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(21):4602–4608. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Amin MB, et al. Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Histologic pattern resembling ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18(12):1224–1232. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199412000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Lipponen PK. Expression of c-myc protein is related to cell proliferation and expression of growth factor receptors in transitional cell bladder cancer. J Pathol. 1995;175(2):203–210. doi: 10.1002/path.1711750208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Le Roith D. Regulation of proliferation and apoptosis by the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Growth Hormon IGF Res. 2000;10:S12–S13. doi: 10.1016/s1096-6374(00)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Theocharis AD, et al. Proteoglycans in health and disease: novel roles for proteoglycans in malignancy and their pharmacological targeting. FEBS J. 2010;277(19):3904–3923. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Iozzo RV, et al. Decorin antagonizes IGF receptor I (IGF-IR) function by interfering with IGF-IR activity and attenuating downstream signaling. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(40):34712–34721. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.262766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Knowles MA, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation in bladder cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009;28(3–4):305–316. doi: 10.1007/s10555-009-9198-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Platt FM, et al. Spectrum of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway gene alterations in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(19):6008–6017. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Cantley LCJS. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Science. 2002;296(5573):1655–1657. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5573.1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.van Rhijn BW, et al. Frequent FGFR3 mutations in urothelial papilloma. J Pathol. 2002;198(2):245–251. doi: 10.1002/path.1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.van Rhijn BW, et al. Molecular grading of urothelial cell carcinoma with fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 and MIB-1 is superior to pathologic grade for the prediction of clinical outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(10):1912–1921. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Hernández S, et al. FGFR3 and Tp53 mutations in T1G3 transitional bladder carcinomas: independent distribution and lack of association with prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(15):5444–5450. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Zieger K, et al. Role of activating fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 mutations in the development of bladder tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(21):7709–7719. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Horton WA, Garofalo S, Lunstrum GP. FGFR3 signaling in achondroplasia: a review. Cell Mater. 1998;8:83–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 148.L'Hôte CG, Knowles MA. Cell responses to FGFR3 signalling: growth, differentiation and apoptosis. Exp Cell Res. 2005;304(2):417–431. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Powers C, McLeskey S, Wellstein A. Fibroblast growth factors, their receptors and signaling. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2000;7(3):165–197. doi: 10.1677/erc.0.0070165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Roberts JT, et al. Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine/cisplatin and methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(suppl_5):v118–v122. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Cecchi F, Rabe DC, Bottaro DP. Targeting the HGF/met signaling pathway in cancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2012;16(6):553–572. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2012.680957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Ciardiello F. EGFR antagonists in cancer treatment. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(11):1160–1174. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0707704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Noon AP, Catto JWF. Challenging current paradigms. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(2):67–68. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Peters S, Adjei AA. MET: a promising anticancer therapeutic target. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9(6):314. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Miyata Y, et al. Phosphorylated hepatocyte growth factor receptor/c-met is associated with tumor growth and prognosis in patients with bladder cancer: correlation with matrix metalloproteinase–2 and–7 and E-cadherin. Hum Pathol. 2009;40(4):496–504. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Yeh C-Y, et al. Transcriptional activation of the Axl and PDGFR-α by c-met through a ras-and Src-independent mechanism in human bladder cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11(1):139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Ronsin C, et al. A novel putative receptor protein tyrosine kinase of the met family. Oncogene. 1993;8(5):1195–1202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Dodelet VC, Pasquale EB. Eph receptors and ephrin ligands: embryogenesis to tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2000;19(49):5614–5619. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Pasquale EB. The Eph family of receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9(5):608–615. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(97)80113-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Gerety SS, et al. Symmetrical mutant phenotypes of the receptor EphB4 and its specific transmembrane ligand ephrin-B2 in cardiovascular development. Mol Cell. 1999;4(3):403–414. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80342-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Holder N, Klein R. Eph receptors and ephrins: effectors of morphogenesis. Development. 1999;126(10):2033–2044. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.10.2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Tickle C, Altabef M. Epithelial cell movements and interactions in limb, neural crest and vasculature. Development. 1999;9(4):455–460. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)80069-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Andres AC, et al. Protein tyrosine kinase expression during the estrous cycle and carcinogenesis of the mammary gland. Int J Cancer. 1995;63(2):288–296. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910630224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Berclaz G, et al. Expression of the receptor protein tyrosine Kinasemyk-1/htkin Normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;226(3):869–875. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Stephenson S-A, et al. Receptor protein tyrosine kinase EphB4 is up-regulated in colon cancer. BMC Mol Biol. 2001;2(1):15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-2-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Takai N, et al. Expression of receptor tyrosine kinase EphB4 and its ligand ephrin-B2 is associated with malignant potential in endometrial cancer. Oncol Rep. 2001;8(3):567–573. doi: 10.3892/or.8.3.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Adams RH, et al. Roles of ephrinB ligands and EphB receptors in cardiovascular development: demarcation of arterial/venous domains, vascular morphogenesis, and sprouting angiogenesis. Genes Dev. 1999;13(3):295–306. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.3.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.O’Leary DD, Wilkinson DG. Eph receptors and ephrins in neural development. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9(1):65–73. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)80008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Oates AC, et al. An early developmental role for eph-ephrin interaction during vertebrate gastrulation. Mech Dev. 1999;83(1–2):77–94. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00036-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Steinle JJ, et al. Eph B4 receptor signaling mediates endothelial cell migration and proliferation via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(46):43830–43835. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207221200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Vogel W. Discoidin domain receptors: structural relations and functional implications. FASEB J. 1999;13(Suppl):S77–S82. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.13.9001.s77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Suh HN, Han HJ. Collagen I regulates the self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells through alpha2beta1 integrin- and DDR1-dependent Bmi-1. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(12):3422–3432. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Yeh YC, Wang CZ, Tang MJ. Discoidin domain receptor 1 activation suppresses alpha2beta1 integrin-dependent cell spreading through inhibition of Cdc42 activity. J Cell Physiol. 2009;218(1):146–156. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Huo Y, et al. High expression of DDR1 is associated with the poor prognosis in Chinese patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:88. doi: 10.1186/s13046-015-0202-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Ikeda K, et al. Discoidin domain receptor 2 interacts with Src and Shc following its activation by type I collagen. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(21):19206–19212. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201078200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Huang EJ, Reichardt LF. Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24(1):677–736. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Miknyoczki SJ, et al. Neurotrophins and Trk receptors in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: expression patterns and effects on in vitro invasive behavior. Int J Cancer. 1999;81(3):417–427. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990505)81:3<417::aid-ijc16>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Montano X, Djamgoz MBA. Epidermal growth factor, neurotrophins and the metastatic cascade in prostate cancer. FEBS Lett. 2004;571(1–3):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.06.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Ricci A, et al. Neurotrophins and neurotrophin receptors in human lung cancer. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001;25(4):439–446. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.25.4.4470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Natali PG, et al. Expression of c-kit receptor in normal and transformed human nonlymphoid tissues. Cancer Res. 1992;52(22):6139–6143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Pietsch T, et al. Expression of the c-kit receptor and its ligand SCF in non-small-cell lung carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 1998;75(2):171–175. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980119)75:2<171::aid-ijc1>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Demetri GD. Seminars in oncology. 2001. Targeting c-kit mutations in solid tumors: scientific rationale and novel therapeutic options. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Potti A, et al. CD117 (c-KIT) overexpression in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(6):894–897. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.DiPaola RS, et al. Evidence for a functional kit receptor in melanoma, breast, and lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 1997;4(3):176–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Yarden Y, et al. Human proto-oncogene c-kit: a new cell surface receptor tyrosine kinase for an unidentified ligand. EMBO J. 1987;6(11):3341–3351. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02655.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Zsebo KM, et al. Stem cell factor is encoded at the SI locus of the mouse and is the ligand for the c-kit tyrosine kinase receptor. Cell. 1990;63(1):213–224. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90302-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Tsuura Y, et al. Preferential localization of c-kit product in tissue mast cells, basal cells of skin, epithelial cells of breast, small cell lung carcinoma and seminoma/dysgerminoma in human: immunohistochemical study on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Virchows Arch. 1994;424(2):135–141. doi: 10.1007/BF00193492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Greer PJNRMCB. Closing in on the biological functions of fps/Fes and Fer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3(4):278–289. doi: 10.1038/nrm783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Kanda S, et al. Downregulation of the c-Fes protein-tyrosine kinase inhibits the proliferation of human renal carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2009;34(1):89–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Miyata Y, et al. Pathological significance and predictive value for biochemical recurrence of c-Fes expression in prostate cancer. Prostate. 2012;72(2):201–208. doi: 10.1002/pros.21422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Campbell LE, Proud CG. Differing substrate specificities of members of the DYRK family of arginine-directed protein kinases. FEBS Lett. 2002;510(1–2):31–36. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03221-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.HIMPEL S, et al. Identification of the autophosphorylation sites and characterization of their effects in the protein kinase DYRK1A. Biochem J. 2001;359(3):497–505. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3590497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Becker W, Joost H-G. Structural and functional characteristics of Dyrk, a novel subfamily of protein kinases with dual specificity, in Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1998;62:1–17. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60503-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Aranda S, Laguna A, de la Luna S. DYRK family of protein kinases: evolutionary relationships, biochemical properties, and functional roles. FASEB J. 2011;25(2):449–462. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-165837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Park J, et al. Function and regulation of Dyrk1A: towards understanding Down syndrome. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66(20):3235–3240. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0123-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Taira N, et al. DYRK2 is targeted to the nucleus and controls p53 via Ser46 phosphorylation in the apoptotic response to DNA damage. Mol Cell. 2007;25(5):725–738. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Qiu Y, Kung HJ. Signaling network of the Btk family kinases. Oncogene. 2000;19(49):5651–5661. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Cell Communication and Signaling : CCS are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES