Abstract
In this work, we have determined the structures of lithium methanesulfonate, Li(CH3SO3), and potassium methanesulfonate, K(CH3SO3), and analysed their vibrational spectra. The lithium salt crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/m with two formula units in the primitive cell. The potassium salt is more complex, crystallizing in I4/m with 12 formula units in the primitive cell. The lithium ion is fourfold coordinated in a distorted tetrahedron, while the potassium salt exhibits three types of coordination: six-, seven- and ninefold. Vibrational spectroscopy of the compounds (including the 6Li and 7Li isotopomers) confirms that the correlation previously found, that in the infrared spectra there is a clear distinction between coordinated and not coordinated forms of the methanesulfonate ion, is also valid here. The lithium salt shows a clear splitting of the asymmetric S–O stretch mode, indicating a bonding interaction, while there is no splitting in the spectrum of the potassium salt, consistent with a purely ionic material.
Keywords: methanesulfonate, inelastic neutron scattering spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, density functional perturbation theory
1. Introduction
Derivatives of methanesulfonic acid, CH3SO3H, which are also known as mesylates, occur widely in chemistry as esters or salts. Some of the organic derivatives are important biologically. This arises because mesylate is a good leaving group in nucleophilic substitution reactions as a result of the efficient delocalization of negative charge between the three oxygen atoms. Thus methyl- and ethylmethanesulfonate are DNA alkylating agents and have been used for many years as DNA damaging agents to induce mutagenesis and in recombination experiments [1,2]. Busulfan (1,4-butanediol dimethanesulfonate) has been used to treat chronic myeloid leukaemia [3].
Metal methanesulfonate salts (M[CH3SO3]x, e.g. M = Na, K, Mg, Ca) occur naturally via the oxidation of dimethyl sulfide and subsequent reaction with the cations present in the ocean [4]. These may then act as condensation nuclei for clouds [5,6]. The alkali metal salts find use in a variety of applications. The potassium salt is used in studies of potassium channels in cells [7] and has been proposed as a novel eluent for liquid chromatography of oligosaccharides [8]. The lithium salt has been tested in a variety of Li-ion batteries [9] because it offers a more stable alternative to the LiPF6 presently used in lithium batteries [10].
We have previously investigated the vibrational spectroscopy of the parent acid, methanesulfonic acid [11] and some of its salts, M = Na, Cs, Cu, Ag, Cd [12]. In the course of our previous work, we have observed a correlation between the type of bonding (ionic or complexed) present and the asymmetric S–O stretch mode in the infrared spectrum. In the present study, we examine the lithium and potassium methanesulfonate salts to further test the correlation. As a prerequisite to this, we have also determined the crystal structures of the compounds.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
K(CH3SO3) (98%), CH3SO3H (99%), 6Li2CO3 (95% 6Li) and 7Li2CO3 (99% 7Li) were purchased from Aldrich and used as received. 6Li(CH3SO3) and 7Li(CH3SO3) were made by the stoichiometric reaction of methanesulfonic acid with the appropriate carbonate. The carbonate (6Li: 1.81 g, 7Li: 1.84 g) was suspended in distilled water and the methanesulfonic acid (4.71 g) added dropwise with continuous stirring. The solution was then evaporated to dryness on a hotplate. The yield was 96%.
2.2. X-ray crystallography
Single crystal X-ray diffraction data were collected from suitable crystals at 150 K with the Mo Kα wavelength using a Rigaku Oxford diffraction Xtalab Synergy S instrument equipped with a liquid nitrogen stream and hybrid pixel array detector (HyPix). The JANA2006 software was used to solve the crystal structure using the built-in charge-flipping algorithm [13]. Details of the refinement are given in table 1 and the CIF files have been deposited with the Cambridge Structural Database. No evidence of impurity phases was found in either dataset.
Table 1.
Crystal data and structure refinement for lithium and potassium methanesulfonates.
| sample | LiCH3SO3 | KCH3SO3 |
|---|---|---|
| empirical formula | CH3LiO3S | CH3KO3S |
| formula weight | 102.0 | 134.2 |
| temperature (K) | 150(2) | 299(4) |
| wavelength (Å) | 0.71073 (Mo Kα) | 0.71073 (Mo Kα) |
| crystal system | monoclinic | tetragonal |
| space group | C2/m | I4/m |
| unit cell dimensions |
a = 7.8181(3) Å b = 7.4574(3) Å c = 6.5288(3) Å β = 90.17(2)° |
a = 22.1326(3) Å c = 6.0532(1) Å |
| volume (Å3) | 380.63(3) | 2965.17(8) |
| Z | 4 | 24 |
| density (calculated) (g cm−3) | 1.7805 | 1.8036 |
| absorption coefficient (mm−1) | 0.678 | 1.37 |
| F(000) | 208 | 1632 |
| crystal size (mm3) | 0.07 × 0.06 × 0.02 | 0.1 × 0.06 × 0.04 |
| theta range for data collection (°) | 3.10–37.34 | 1.84–29.56 |
| index ranges | −13 ≤ h ≤ 13 102 ≤ k ≤ 12 10 ≤ l ≤ 11 |
−28 ≤ h ≤ 22 −28 ≤ k ≤ 29 −7 ≤ l ≤ 7 |
| reflections collected | 8457 | 20 507 |
| independent reflections (I > 3σ(I)/all) | 936/1018 | 1731/2078 |
| R(int) | 0.0336 | 0.0253 |
| absorption correction | empirical | numerical Gauss integration |
| max. and min. transmission | 1.0 and 0.89 | 1.0 and 0.851 |
| refinement method | full-matrix least squares on F2 | full-matrix least squares on F2 |
| data/constraints/parameters | 1018/2/38 | 2078/6/115 |
| goodness-of-fit on F2 (I > 3σ(I)/all) | 3.05/2.93 | 2.61/2.40 |
| final R-indices (I > 3σ(I)) |
R1 = 0. 0296 wR2 = 0. 0922 |
R1 = 0.0300 wR2 = 0.0814 |
| final R-indices (all data) |
R1 = 0. 0321 wR2 = 0. 0926 |
R1 = 0.0373 wR2 = 0.0825 |
| largest diff. peak and hole (e Å−3) | 0.86 and 0.37 | 0.56 and −0.43 |
2.3. Vibrational spectroscopy
Inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectra were recorded at less than 20 K using TOSCA [14] at ISIS.1 Infrared spectra were recorded using a Bruker Vertex70 FTIR spectrometer, over the range 100–4000 cm−1 at 4 cm−1 resolution with a DLaTGS detector using 64 scans and the Bruker Diamond ATR. The use of the ultra-wide range beamsplitter enabled the entire spectral range to be recorded without the need to change beamsplitters. The spectra have been corrected for the wavelength-dependent variation in path length using the Bruker software. FT-Raman spectra were recorded with a Bruker MultiRam spectrometer using 1064 nm excitation, 4 cm−1 resolution, 500 mW laser power and 64 scans. All the infrared and Raman spectra were measured in air at room temperature.
2.4. Computational studies
The plane wave pseudopotential-based program CASTEP was used for the calculation of the vibrational transition energies and their intensities [15,16]. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional was used in conjunction with optimized norm-conserving pseudopotentials. The plane-wave cut-off energy was 830 eV. For the Li salt a 4 × 6 × 4 (48 k-points) Monkhorst–Pack grid was used, for the K salt a 8 × 8 × 3 (96 k-points) grid was used. All of the calculations were converged to better than |0.009| eV Å−1. After geometry optimization, the vibrational spectra were calculated in the harmonic approximation using density functional perturbation theory (DFT) [17]. This procedure generates the vibrational eigenvalues and eigenvectors, which allows visualization of the modes within Materials Studio2 and is also the information needed to calculate the INS spectrum using the program ACLIMAX [18]. Transition energies for isotopic species were calculated from the dynamical matrix that is stored in the CASTEP checkpoint file using the PHONONS utility [19]. We emphasize that the transition energies have not been scaled.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Structural studies
The structures of the lithium and potassium salts of methanesulfonic acid have been previously determined; however, as far as we are aware, neither has been deposited in a recognized database, e.g. the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) [20]. Brief descriptions are provided in conference abstracts (Li [21], K [22]), and the atomic coordinates of the Li salt are given in a thesis [23]; those of the K salt are unavailable. The structure is an essential requirement for the periodic-DFT calculations that we will use to assign the spectra; accordingly, we have re-determined both structures. Table 1 summarizes the results of the structural determinations and figures 1 and 2 show the structures.
Figure 1.

Two unit cells of the C2/m structure of Li(CH3SO3). The c-axis is vertical. (Grey = carbon, white = hydrogen, red = oxygen, yellow = sulfur, purple = lithium.)
Figure 2.
Four unit cells of the I4/m structure of K(CH3SO3) viewed along the c-axis. (Grey = carbon, white = hydrogen, red = oxygen, yellow = sulfur, green = potassium.)
Li(CH3SO3) is a relatively simple structure with two formula units arranged centrosymmetrically in the primitive cell. In contrast, K(CH3SO3) is much more complicated with 12 formula units in the primitive cell, comprising three groups of four, each group being on a Wyckoff h site.
Table 2 presents some selected distances. In both structures the methanesulfonate ion lies on a mirror plane, so has Cs symmetry; however, the molecular symmetry is close to C3v. Otherwise, the methanesulfonate ion is unremarkable, the molecular geometry is very similar to that found in Na(CH3SO3) [24] and Cs(CH3SO3) [25].
Table 2.
Selected bond distances (Å) of lithium and potassium methanesulfonates.
| distance | Li(CH3SO3) |
K(CH3SO3) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| observed | calculated | observed | calculated | |
| C1–H | 0.939, 2 × 0.848 | 1.095, 2 × 1.094 | 2 × 0.950, 0.978 | 1.095, 2 × 1.096 |
| C2–H | 2 × 0.920, 0.934 | 3 × 1.096 | ||
| C3–H | 0.934, 2 × 0.854 | 2 × 1.094, 1.096 | ||
| C123–S | 1.743 | 1.771 | 1.752, 1.743, 1.756 | 1.783, 1.783, 1.783 |
| S1–O | 1.443, 2 × 1.471 | 1.485, 2 × 1.469 | 2 × 1.451, 1.452 | 2 × 1.474, 1.477 |
| S2–O | 1.434, 2 × 1.452 | 1.465, 2 × 1.479 | ||
| S3–O | 1.422, 2 × 1.414 | 1.472, 2 × 1.474 | ||
| M–O | 2 × 1.922, 2 × 2.000 |
2 × 1.925, 2 × 1.993 |
K1: 2.666, 2 × 2.804, 2 × 2.827, 2 × 2.947, 2 × 3.062 |
K1: 2.715, 2 × 2.813, 2 × 2.842, 2 × 2.972, 2 × 3.070 |
| K2: 2.646, 2 × 2.677, 2.712, 2 × 2.799 |
K2: 2.680, 2 × 2.702, 2.712 2 × 2.828 |
|||
| K3: 2 × 2.689, 2 × 2.753, 2 × 2.974, 3.061 |
K3: 2 × 2.692, 2 × 2.775, 2 × 2.938, 2.963 |
|||
In contrast to the similarity of the methanesulfonate ion in both structures, the coordination of the metal ions is very different: distorted tetrahedral for Li and multiple coordinate for K. On the basis of the infrared spectrum of the Li salt, it had been suggested that the lithium was coordinated to the methanesulfonate [26]. Figure 1 shows that this deduction is correct. Analyses [27,28] of Li–O compounds found that tetrahedral coordination was the most common with <Li–O> = 1.96 Å [27], 1.972 Å [28], completely in accord with that seen here (2 × 1.922, 2 × 2.000 Å). In particular, the Li ion in Li(CF3SO3) [29] shows Li–O distances of 1.873, 1.901, 1.988 and 1.995 Å.
In K(CH3SO3), the potassium ion occupies three distinct sites, with sixfold, sevenfold and ninefold coordination. In each case, the site symmetry is Cs. The coordination polyhedra consist of a distorted octahedron, a capped trigonal prism (the cap being on one of the rectangular faces) and a very distorted square antiprism with one of the triangular faces capped. As may be seen in table 3, the K–O distances fall well within the ranges commonly found for the particular type of coordination [28]. Only for sixfold coordination is the average distance seen here apparently somewhat shorter than usually seen, however, the modal K–O distance of 714 structures is 2.72 Å [28], exactly as found here (2.718 Å).
Table 3.
The coordination around the K+ ions of potassium methanesulfonate. Short, Long and Ave. are the shortest, longest and average K–O distances (all in Å).
| coordination number | K(CH3SO3) |
literature [28] |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short | Long | Ave. | Short | Long | Ave. | |
| 6 | 2.646 | 2.799 | 2.718 | 2.447 | 3.587 | 2.828 |
| 7 | 2.689 | 3.061 | 2.842 | 2.524 | 3.554 | 2.861 |
| 9 | 2.666 | 3.062 | 2.883 | 2.491 | 3.797 | 2.955 |
A common motif of the structures of metal methanesulfonates is the separation into polar and non-polar regions. It can be seen from figure 1 that Li(CH3SO3) conforms to this expectation, as it forms a structure with alternating layers of sulfonate and methyl groups. K(CH3SO3) is a much more complex structure; in this case, there are channels running along the c-axis that the methyl groups protrude into (highlighted by the large circle in figure 2) with a concentric ring of sulfonate groups and potassium ions. There is an apparent second smaller mixed ring (highlighted by the small circle in figure 2); however, this is deceiving because as figure 3 shows, the methyl and sulfonate groups ‘interdigitate’ to minimize the interactions.
Figure 3.

Expanded view of the apparent ‘mixed’ ring in the I4/m structure of K(CH3SO3). (Grey = carbon, white = hydrogen, red = oxygen, yellow = sulfur, the K+ ions are omitted for clarity.)
3.2. Vibrational spectroscopy
Figures 4 and 5 show the infrared, Raman and INS spectra of the Li and K salts, respectively. The infrared and Raman spectra of the Li salt [21,23,26] and the infrared spectrum of the K salt [30] have been reported previously. The present spectra are in general agreement with the literature spectra but have an extended transition energy range, and the INS spectra are previously unreported. The spectra of the two salts are broadly similar and do not hint at the complexity of the structure of the K salt. As seen in our previous work [12], the INS spectra are dominated by the methyl modes, particularly the rock (approx. 950 cm−1) and the torsion (200–300 cm−1). In the K salt, the latter are especially intense. The methyl modes appear only weakly in the infrared and Raman spectra, but they do permit clear observation of the C–H stretch modes that are difficult to see in the INS spectra with this instrument [31]. The infrared and Raman spectra show predominantly the sulfonate modes: S–O stretches (1000–1300 cm−1), C–S stretch (approx. 800 cm−1), O–S–O bends (500–600 cm−1) and the sulfonate rock (approx. 350 cm−1). Modes involving significant lithium motion are seen in the range 300–500 cm−1 (indicated by * in figure 4).
Figure 4.

Vibrational spectra of Li(CH3SO3): (a) INS, (b) Raman and (c) infrared (the 2900–3200 cm−1 is ×5 ordinate expanded relative to the 0–1600 cm−1 region). For each pair of spectra, the upper (red) trace is the 7Li isotopomer and the lower (blue) trace is the 6Li isotopomer. The * indicates Li sensitive modes.
Figure 5.

Vibrational spectra of K(CH3SO3): (a) INS, (b) Raman and (c) infrared (the 2900–3200 cm−1 is ×10 ordinate expanded relative to the 0–1600 cm−1 region).
To provide more definitive assignments requires periodic-DFT calculations. Figure 6 compares the observed and calculated INS spectra of Li(CH3SO3) and K(CH3SO3). It can be seen that the agreement is reasonable in terms of both the transition energy and the relative intensities. This is more so for the Li compound because the calculation is for the entire Brillouin zone, whereas it is for the Γ-point only for the K compound because of the complexity of the system. The intensity mismatch in the region greater than 800 cm−1 is likely to be the result of the Debye–Waller factor being too large because the lattice mode region is calculated to be too strong.
Figure 6.

Comparison of experimental (red, blue and violet) and calculated (brown, olive and orange) INS spectra of: (a) 7Li(CH3SO3), (b) 6Li(CH3SO3) isotopomer and (c) K(CH3SO3).
Nonetheless, the agreement is sufficiently good as to allow definitive assignments. Li(CH3SO3) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/m (no. 12) with two formula units in the primitive cell, thus there are 54 modes in total comprising 3 acoustic modes, 9 optic translational modes of the ions, together with 6 librational and 36 internal modes of the methanesulfonate ion. Similarly, K(CH3SO3) crystallizes in the tetragonal space group I4/m (no. 87) with 12 formula units in the primitive cell, thus there are 324 modes in total comprising three acoustic modes, 69 optic translational modes of the ions, together with 36 librational and 216 internal modes of the methanesulfonate ion. This means that each mode of the ‘free’ M(CH3SO3) species will give rise to four (Li) or 12 (K) factor group components. Inspection of figures 4 and 5 gives no indication of significant factor group splitting in the spectra, with the exception of the multiple methyl torsions in the K compound, and this is confirmed by the calculations. In the K salt, the methanesulfonates occupy three independent Wyckoff h sites and each of these is responsible for one of the torsion modes at 213, 257 and 286 cm−1, (the fourth very strong mode at 343 cm−1 is a rocking mode of the sulfonate group, which results in a large displacement of the methyl group, accounting for its intensity). Table 4 lists the observed modes and the average of the factor group splitting (except for the torsions) of the calculated modes with their assignments.
Table 4.
Observed and the average of the calculated factor group splitting (CASTEP) transition energies (cm−1) of 6Li(CH3SO3), 7Li(CH3SO3) and K(CH3SO3). (v, very; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; br, broad; sh, shoulder).
| Li(CH3SO3) |
K(CH3SO3) |
description | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASTEP | INS | Raman | Infrared | CASTEP | INS | Raman | Infrared | |
| 3100 | 3040w | 3084 | 3028sh | 3017w, | CH3 asymmetric stretch | |||
| 3099 | 3034w | 3030w | 3069 | 3015w | 3007w | CH3 asymmetric stretch | ||
| 2990 | 2955w | 2955w | 2839 | 2944sh, 2935w | 2934w | CH3 symmetric stretch | ||
| 1433 | 1423 m | 1427w | 1420 | 1420s | 1436w | 1435w | CH3 asymmetric bend | |
| 1396 | 1412w | 1407w | 1402 | 1422w | 1421w | CH3 asymmetric bend | ||
| 1317 | 1340 m | 1343vw | 1336w | 1300 | 1330s | 1349, 1330, 1315 | CH3 symmetric bend | |
| 1191 | 1213w | 1236s | 1192 | 1221w | 1243w, 1228w, | 1238sh, 1222sh, | SO3 asymmetric stretch | |
| 1141 | 1184w | 1174vs | 1156 | 1181w | 1212sh, 1201w, 1196sh,1180w | 1186vs,br, 1127sh | SO3 asymmetric stretch | |
| 1039 | 1082s | 1065s | 1022 | 1066vs, 1058sh | 1048vs | SO3 symmetric stretch | ||
| 949 | 970vs | 970w | 973w | 958 | 987s | 983w | CH3 rock | |
| 941 | 934 | 963s | 961w | 964w | CH3 rock | |||
| 757 | 797w | 797s | 783 m | 742 | 785w, 769sh | 788s, 776 m | 783s, 771s | C–S stretch + SO3 symmetric bend |
| 559 (6Li) 555 (7Li) |
565w (6Li) 565w (7Li) |
564 m (6Li) 563 m (7Li) |
532 | 564 m | 560sh, 555 m | SO3 symmetric bend + C–S stretch | ||
| 538 (6Li) 533 (7Li) |
551 m (6Li) 551 m (7Li) |
546w (6Li) 539w (7Li) |
543w (6Li) 542w (7Li) |
515 | 538w | 534s | SO3 asymmetric bend | |
| 520 (6Li) 515 (7Li) |
532w (6Li) 532w (7Li) |
503 | 527w | 524s | SO3 asymmetric bend | |||
| 477 (6Li) 455 (7Li) |
447w (6Li) 425w (7Li) |
441w (6Li) 416w (7Li) |
Li+ translation | |||||
| 458 (6Li) | ||||||||
| 437 (7Li) | Li+ translation | |||||||
| 354 (6Li) 335 (7Li) |
357 m (6Li) 351 m (7Li) |
Li+ translation | ||||||
| 334 (6Li) 330 (7Li) |
349s (6Li) 343s (7Li) |
349 m (6Li) 346 m (7Li) |
329 | 343vs | 346w | 341s | SO3 rock | |
| 323 (6Li) 316 (7Li) |
333s (6Li) 332s (7Li) |
321 | SO3 rock | |||||
| 275 | 292s | 283 | 286vs | CH3 torsion | ||||
| 257 | 266s | 244 | 257vs | CH3 torsion | ||||
| 202 | 213vs | CH3 torsion | ||||||
As seen previously [12], only the methyl-related modes (C–H bends, rock and torsion), have significant intensity in the INS spectrum and demonstrates that the coupling between the CH3 and SO3 functionalities in the ion is weak. The strongest modes in the infrared and Raman spectra are motions of the sulfonate group, as these involve significant charge distortions that generate the intensity.
As noted earlier, the metal coordination is distinctly different in the two compounds: fourfold for Li and six-, seven- and ninefold for K. The bond distances are also very different: 1.922–2.000 for Li and 2.652–3.222 for K. We take these differences to indicate that the interaction with Li is significantly stronger than for K. The calculated spectra provide support for this idea. Figure 7 shows pseudo-INS spectra calculated by setting the cross section of the atom of interest to 100 barn and all other atoms to 0 barn. Thus only modes that involve motion of the atom will contribute to the spectrum. For the K salt, it can be seen that all the metal ion modes occur below 200 cm−1 (figure 7a), while for the Li salt there are two groups of metal ion modes at 300–350 and 400–480 cm−1 (figure 7b,c). Inspection of the mode animations shows that the former arise from a coupled motion with the sulfonate rock modes. The latter can be considered to be either Li translations or Li–O bond stretching. In the K salt, the distances are consistent with a purely ionic material, so by calculating the spectrum for the K salt but with a mass of 7 amu, i.e. ‘7K’, we approximate what the transition energies would be for a Li ion that is only involved in ionic interactions. The result is shown in figure 7d and it can be seen that the maximum energy is 350 cm−1, approximately 100 cm−1 below that seen in the Li salt. This suggests that there is an additional interaction in the Li salt, thus the description of the modes as Li–O bond stretching is the better choice.
Figure 7.

Pseudo-INS spectra of the modes that involve metal ion motion. (a) natK(CH3SO3), (b) 7Li(CH3SO3), (c) 6Li(CH3SO3) and (d) ‘7K(CH3SO3)’.
In previous work [12], we showed that in compounds with coordinated methanesulfonate ions, the asymmetric S–O stretch mode is both strongly perturbed and is downshifted with respect to purely ionic compounds. This is best seen in the infrared spectra and a comparison of the Li and K salts with those studied earlier—Cs(CH3SO3), Na(CH3SO3), Ag(CH3SO3), Cd(H2O)2(CH3SO3)2 and Cu(H2O)4(CH3SO3)2—is shown in figure 8. It can be seen that the degeneracy of the S–O asymmetric stretch at 1100–1250 cm−1 is lifted and two modes appear. (For the Cd salt, this manifests as a pronounced broadening of the band.) While the spectrum of the K salt is very similar to that of the Cs and Na salts, the distinct splitting of the S–O asymmetric stretch in the Li salt is reminiscent of that found in the coordination compounds, consistent with Li–O bonding.
Figure 8.

Infrared spectra of (a) Cs(CH3SO3), (b) K(CH3SO3), (c) Na(CH3SO3), (d) 7Li(CH3SO3), (e) Ag(CH3SO3), (f) Cd(H2O)2(CH3SO3)2 and (g) Cu(H2O)4(CH3SO3)2 in the S–O stretch mode region of the sulfonate ion. The symmetric stretch is at 1000–1050 cm−1 and asymmetric stretch is at 1100–1250 cm−1.
4. Conclusion
In this work, we have determined the structures of lithium and potassium methanesulfonates and analysed their vibrational spectra. The structural study shows that the metal coordination is not unusual, although the presence of three types—six-, seven- and ninefold—in the potassium salt is noteworthy. The vibrational spectroscopy confirms that the correlation previously found [12], that in the infrared spectrum there is a clear distinction between coordinated and not coordinated forms of the methanesulfonate ion, is also valid here. The lithium salt shows a clear splitting of the asymmetric S–O stretch mode, indicating a bonding interaction, while there is no splitting in the spectrum of the potassium salt, consistent with a purely ionic material.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory is thanked for access to neutron beam facilities. Computing resources (time on the SCARF compute cluster for the CASTEP calculations) was provided by STFC's e-Science facility. This research has been performed with the aid of facilities at the Research Complex at Harwell, including the FT-Raman spectrometer. The authors would like to thank the Research Complex for access to, and support of, these facilities and equipment.
Footnotes
Data accessibility
The datasets supporting this article are available from the Science and Technology Facilities data repository eData at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5286/edata/739. The structures of lithium methanesulfonate and potassium methanesulfonate have also been deposited with the CSD [20]. The deposit numbers are: CCDC 1989314 for K(CH3SO3) and CCDC 1989315 for Li(CH3SO3). The INS spectra of 6Li(CH3SO3), 7Li(CH3SO3) and K(CH3SO3) are available from the INS database at: http://wwwisis2.isis.rl.ac.uk/INSdatabase/.
Authors' contributions
E.J.R.-H. made the 6Li(CH3SO3) and 7Li(CH3SO3) salts and measured the infrared and Raman spectra of all the compounds; D.W.N. collected the single-crystal X-ray data; M.J.G. carried out the structure solution; S.F.P. measured the INS spectra, carried out the DFT calculations and wrote the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
This work is supported by the Science and Technologies Research Council (STFC).
References
- 1.Yi H, Richards EJ. 2008. Phenotypic instability of Arabidopsis alleles affecting a disease Resistance gene cluster. BMC Plant Biol. 8, 36 ( 10.1186/1471-2229-8-36) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schuermann D, Molinier J, Fritsch O, Hohn B. 2005. The dual nature of homologous recombination in plants. Trends Genet. 21, 172–181. ( 10.1016/j.tig.2005.01.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Silverman RB, Holladay MW. 2015. The organic chemistry of drug design and drug action, 3rd edn, pp. 275–331. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kwong KC, Chim MM, Hoffmann EH, Tilgner A, Herrmann H, Davies JF, Wilson KR, Chan MN. 2018. Chemical transformation of methanesulfonic acid and sodium methanesulfonate through heterogeneous OH oxidation. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2, 895−903. ( 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00072) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu Y, Laskin A. 2009. Hygroscopic properties of CH3SO3Na, CH3SO3NH4, (CH3SO3)2Mg, and (CH3SO3)2Ca particles studied by micro-FTIR spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 1531–1538. ( 10.1021/jp8079149) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tang M, et al. 2019. Impacts of methanesulfonate on the cloud condensation nucleation activity of sea salt aerosol. Atmos. Environ. 201, 13–17. ( 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.034) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jacobs EA, Decoursey TE. 1990. Mechanisms of potassium channel block in rat alveolar epithelial cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Tech. 255, 459–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen Y, Barreto V, Woodruff A, Lu Z, Liu Y, Pohl C. 2018. Dual electrolytic eluent generation for oligosaccharides analysis using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography. Anal. Chem. 90, 10 910–10 916. ( 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02436) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ershadi M, Javanbakht M, Beheshti SHR, Mosallanejad B, Kiaei Z. 2018. A patent landscape on liquid electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. Anal. Bioanal. Electrochem. 10, 1629–1653. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nishi Y, Azuma H, Omaru A. 1990. Non aqueous electrolyte cell. US patent number 4959281.
- 11.Zhong L, Parker SF. 2018. Structure and vibrational spectroscopy of methanesulfonic acid. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 181363 ( 10.1098/rsos.181363.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Parker SF, Zhong L. 2018. Vibrational spectroscopy of metal methanesulfonates, M = Na, Cs, Cu, Ag, Cd. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171574 ( 10.1098/rsos.171574) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Petricek V, Dusek M, Palatinus L. 2014. Crystallographic computing system JANA2006: general features. Z. Kristallogr. 229, 345–352. 10.1515/zkri-2014-1737) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Parker SF, Fernandez-Alonso F, Ramirez-Cuesta AJ, Tomkinson J, Rudic S, Pinna RS, Gorini G, Fernández Castañon J. 2014. Recent and future developments on TOSCA at ISIS. J. Phys. Conf. Series 554, 012003 10.1088/1742-6596/554/1/012003) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Clark SJ, Segall MD, Pickard CJ, Hasnip PJ, Probert MJ, Refson K, Payne MC. 2005. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Kristallographie 220, 567–570. ( 10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Refson K, Clark SJ, Tulip PR. 2006. Variational density functional perturbation theory for dielectrics and lattice dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 73, 155114 ( 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.155114) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Milman V, Perlov A, Refson K, Clark SJ, Gavartin J, Winkler B. 2009. Structural, electronic and vibrational properties of tetragonal zirconia under pressure: a density functional theory study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 485404 10.1088/0953-8984/21/48/485404) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ramirez-Cuesta AJ. 2004. aCLIMAX 4.0.1, The new version of the software for analyzing and interpreting INS spectra. Comp. Phys. Comm. 157, 226–238. ( 10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00520-4) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Refson K. Phonons and Related Calculations in CASTEP. http://www.castep.org/
- 20.Groom C.R, Bruno IJ, Lightfoot MP, Ward SC. 2016. The Cambridge Structural Database Acta Cryst. B 72, 171–179. ( 10.1107/S2052520616003954) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trella T, Frank W. 2014. Structure and thermolysis of lithium methanesulfonate. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 640, 2367 ( 10.1002/zaac.201404062) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Volk J, Frank W. 2012. Crystal structures of short-chain alkali metal alkanesulfonates: anhydrous potassium methanesulfonate, rubidium methanesulfonate hemihydrate and an unusual 13:2 addition compound of potassium ethanesulfonate and potassium carbonate. Z. Krist. Suppl. 32, 111. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Trella T. 2014. Hydratisierung und Koordinationschemie von Haupt- und Nebengruppenmetallmethansulfonaten. PhD thesis, Heinrich-Heine-Universität; Düsseldorf: https://docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-36889/Trella_Promotion_2015.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wei CH, Hingerty BE. 1981. Structure of sodium methanesulfonate. Acta Cryst. B 37, 1992–1997. ( 10.1107/S056774088100784X) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brandon JK, Brown ID. 1967. Crystal structure of cesium methylsulfonate, CsCH3SO3. Can. J. Chem. 45, 1385–1390. ( 10.1139/v67-229) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Capwell RJ, Rhee KH, Seshadri KS. 1968. Vibrational spectra of Na and Li methanesulfonate. Spectrochim. Acta A 24, 955–958. ( 10.1016/0584-8539(68)80113-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wenger M, Armbruster T. 1991. Crystal chemistry of lithium; oxygen coordination and bonding. Eur. J. Mineralogy 3, 387–399. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gagné OC, Hawthorne FC. 2016. Bond-length distributions for ions bonded to oxygen: alkali and alkaline-earth metals. Acta Crystallogr. B 72, 602–625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bolte M, Lerner H-W. 2001. Lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate. Acta Crystallogr. E 57, m231–m232. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cotton FA, Curtis NF. 1965. Some new derivatives of the octa-μ3-chlorohexamolybdate(II), [Mo6C18]4+, ion. Inorg. Chem. 4, 241–244. ( 10.1021/ic50024a025) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Parker SF, Lennon D. 2016. Applications of neutron scattering to heterogeneous catalysis. J. Phys. Conf. Series 746, 012066 ( 10.1088/1742-6596/746/1/012066) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets supporting this article are available from the Science and Technology Facilities data repository eData at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5286/edata/739. The structures of lithium methanesulfonate and potassium methanesulfonate have also been deposited with the CSD [20]. The deposit numbers are: CCDC 1989314 for K(CH3SO3) and CCDC 1989315 for Li(CH3SO3). The INS spectra of 6Li(CH3SO3), 7Li(CH3SO3) and K(CH3SO3) are available from the INS database at: http://wwwisis2.isis.rl.ac.uk/INSdatabase/.

