Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Aug 15;2(4):100214. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100214

Obstetrics and gynecology emergency services during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

Ginevra Salsi 1, Anna Seidenari 1, Josefina Diglio 1, Federica Bellussi 1, Gianluigi Pilu 1, Federica Bellussi 2
PMCID: PMC7428774  PMID: 32838279

Objective

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the entirety of clinical assistance in Italy has been reorganized to minimize the risk of infection. In addition, people have been forbidden to leave their homes except for strictly necessary reasons. These reasons, together with women’s perception of the high risk of COVID-19 in hospitals, led to a substantial drop in the number of patients presenting themselves to emergency department (ED) services. In Italy, emergency services and most healthcare services are free of charge for everyone. Therefore, we decided to evaluate the number of women self-referring to the obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) ED triage and the percentage of admission before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study Design

This was a retrospective study conducted at S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital of Bologna (a tertiary center with 2900 deliveries each year) during the following 2 periods: March 1 to 31, 2020, in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic and after Italian authorities adopted restrictive measures, compared with a control period before the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1–31, 2019) (Figure ). Patients were divided into the following 3 groups: gynecologic patients, pregnant women up to 16 weeks, and pregnant women >16 weeks. The primary outcome was the number of hospitalized patients in the 2 study periods. Secondary outcomes were the reasons for and the proportion admitted of the total number of women seeking ED services. For each category, we identified different possible reasons for admission to OB-GYN ED, as reported in the Table . This was a clinical audit of fully anonymized data, and we judged it to fit the definition of a quality improvement study.1 Differences between 2020 and 2019 were assessed with z-tests. Exact Poisson confidence intervals were estimated by using the upper and lower bounds for Poisson-distributed counts.

Figure.

Figure

Number of patients admitted to ED and hospitalization rate in the 2 study periods

ED, emergency department.

Salsi. Obstetrics and gynecology emergencies during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. AJOG MFM 2020.

Table.

Numbers and details of patients self-referring to OB-GYN ED during March 2019 and March 2020, with hospitalization rates. After reporting the total number of self-referrals, further analysis were made dividing patients in three categories: gynecological patients, obstetrical patients <16 weeks and obstetrical patients >16 weeks

Self-referral
Hospitalization
March 2019 (N=972) March 2020 (N=484) Reduction (%) P value March 2019 hospitalization (%) March 2020 hospitalization (%) P value
Total number of patients referring to OB-GYN ED
 Gynecologic 330 112 66.1 <.001 88 (26.7) 38 (33.9) .141
 Obstetrical <16 wk 242 118 51.2 <.001 56 (23.1) 24 (20.3) .548
 Obstetrical ≥16 wk 400 254 36.5 <.001 223 (55.8) 164 (64.6) .025
 Total 972 484 50.2 <.001 367/972 (37.7) 226/484 (46.7) .001
March 2019
N=330 (%)
March 2020
N=112 (%)a
Reduction (%)b P value March 2019 hospitalization N=88 (%) March 2020 hospitalization N=38 (%)c P value
Gynecologic patients
 Vaginal bleeding 85 (25.8) 26 (23.2) 69.4 <.001 17 (20) 12 (46.2) .008
 Lower abdominal pain 70 (21.2) 26 (23.2) 62.9 <.001 23 (32.9) 7 (26.9) .577
 Vulvar conditions 41 (12.4) 17 (15.2) 58.5 .004 5 (12.2) 5 (29.4) .114
 Postpartum complications 33 (10) 15 (13.4) 54.5 .013 10 (30.3) 4 (26.7) .797
 Vaginal bleeding and lower abdominal pain 20 (6.1) 14 (12.5) 30 .311 5 (25) 4 (28.6) .816
 Vaginal discharge 27 (8.2) 6 (5.4) 77.8 .001 0 0
 Other 54 (16.4) 8 (7.1) 85.2 <.001 28 (51.9) 6 (75) .220
March 2019
N=242 (%)
March 2020
N=118 (%)a
Reduction (%)b P value March 2019 hospitalization N=56 (%) March 2020 hospitalization N=24 (%)c P value
Obstetrical patients <16 wk
 Vaginal bleeding 108 (44.6) 56 (47.5) 48.1 <.001 14 (13) 7 (12.5) .933
 Vaginal bleeding and lower abdominal pain 45 (18.6) 32 (27.1) 28.9 .140 17 (37.8) 9 (28.1) .377
 Lower abdominal pain 39 (16.1) 17 (14.4) 56.4 .017 6 (15.4) 3 (17.6) .832
 Hyperemesis 13 (5.4) 2 (1.7) 84.6 .014 7 (53.8) 0 .155
 Other 37 (15.3) 11 (9.3) 70.3 <.001 12 (32.4) 5 (45.5) .428
March 2019
N=400 (%)
March 2020
N=254 (%)a
Reduction (%)b P value March 2019 hospitalization N=223 (%) March 2020 hospitalization N=164 (%)c P value
Obstetrical patients >16 wk
 Painful uterine contraction or labor 118 (29.5) 79 (31.1) 33 .010 96 (81.4) 56 (70.9) .086
 Leaking amniotic fluid (PROM or suspected PROM) 77 (19.3) 53 (20.9) 31.2 .050 57 (74) 49 (92.5) .008
 Lower abdominal pain (not classified as labor) (<36 wk) 50 (12.5) 31 (12.2) 38 .037 9 (18) 6 (19.4) .879
 High blood pressure 15 (3.8) 22 (8.7) 46.6 .275 12 (80) 20 (90.9) .341
 Vaginal bleeding 24 (6) 18 (7.1) 25 .361 8 (33.3) 1 (5.6) .030
 Reduced fetal movements 18 (4.5) 10 (3.9) 44.4 .153 5 (27.8) 6 (60) .094
 Other 98 (24.5) 41 (16.1) 58.2 <.001 62 (63.4) 15 (36.6) .004

ED, emergency department; OB-GYN, obstetrics and gynecology; PROM, premature rupture of membranes.

Salsi. Obstetrics and gynecology emergencies during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. AJOG MFM 2020.

a

Total number of patients for each category in 2020 with percentage calculated over the total number of gynecologic patients for that month

b

reduction in percentage when compared with those in the same period in 2019

c

percentage of patients in this category admitted to hospital over the number of access for that reason during March 2020.

Results

A total of 972 women self-referred to our OB-GYN ED during March 2019. During March 2020, the total number of OB-GYN self-referrals was 484, indicating a 50.2% reduction (P<.001), likely because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the number of patients admitted to the hospital was lower in 2020, but analyzing the proportion of women being hospitalized over the number of accesses, the hospitalization rate was significantly higher during the COVID-19 pandemic (226/484, 46.7% vs 367/972, 37.7% in 2019; P<.001), suggesting that during the COVID-19 pandemic, women are going to hospital for more serious problems than in previous years.

When the 3 groups were compared separately, the proportion of inpatient admissions was significantly lower in 2019 than in 2020 only in the category of pregnant women >16 weeks (64.6% vs 55.8% in 2019; P=.025). Conversely, no significant difference was observed in the other 2 groups. Results are reported in the Table.

Conclusion

The significant reduction in OB-GYN ED accesses observed during the COVID-19 pandemic represents the indirect evidence of the probably inappropriate use of emergency services under normal circumstances by women, going to ED just to obtain a clinical evaluation or an ultrasound quickly, with consequent higher healthcare costs. However, we want to stress the possibility that people’s fear of COVID-19 might lead to critical situations owing to important delays in seeking medical care, even if apparently this was not the case in our population. The main strength of this study is that this is the only type of ED in which it is possible to conduct this kind of analysis, because it is not affected by the higher number of patients with COVID-19 infection seeking emergency services. We noted that the only cause of OB-GYN ED referral that increased in March 2020 compared with 2019 is high blood pressure in pregnancy; this might be an indirect sign of higher stress rates among pregnant women.

Footnotes

This paper is part of a supplement that represents a collection of COVID-related articles selected for publication by the editors of AJOG MFM without additional financial support.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Reference

  • 1.Casarett D., Karlawish J.H., Sugarman J. Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research: proposed criteria and potential implications. JAMA. 2000;283:2275–2280. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.17.2275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES