Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Nanomedicine logoLink to International Journal of Nanomedicine
. 2020 Aug 11;15:5951–5961. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S255784

Green Synthesis of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) and Their Antimicrobial Applications: A Review

Muhammad Nadeem 1,✉, Ramsha Khan 1, Komal Afridi 1, Akhtar Nadhman 1, Sana Ullah 2, Sulaiman Faisal 1, Zia Ul Mabood 1, Christophe Hano 3, Bilal Haider Abbasi 2
PMCID: PMC7429212  PMID: 32848398

Abstract

During the last decade green synthesized cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) attracted remarkable interest in various fields of science and technology. This review, explores the vast array of biological resources such as plants, microbes, and other biological products being used in synthesis of CeO2 NPs. It also discusses their biosynthetic mechanism, current understandings, and trends in the green synthesis of CeO2 NPs. Novel therapies based on green synthesized CeO2 NPs are illustrated, in particular their antimicrobial potential along with attempts of their mechanistic elucidation. Overall, the main objective of this review is to provide a rational insight of the major accomplishments of CeO2 NPs as novel therapeutics agents for a wide range of microbial pathogens and combating other diseases.

Keywords: nanotechnology, green synthesis, cerium oxide, nanoparticles, antimicrobial, infections, biomedical

Introduction

Nanotechnology has got a remarkable interest in every field of science and technology and is presently considered among one of the leading research avenues. It has a multitude of applications in the field of electronics, imaging, industry, and healthcare.1,4 Mostly, in healthcare it has been exploited in diseases diagnostics, treatment, delivery, and formulations of novel drugs.1,4 It exploits nano size structures with size ranges from 1–100 nm, known as nanoparticle (NPs). These nano-scale entities have unique physiochemical properties and have been utilized in various fields of physics, biology, and chemistry.5

Among other NPs, Cerium Oxide (CeO2) NPs have been mostly exploited due to their unique surface chemistry, high stability, and biocompatibility.6,7 It is mostly used in the fabrication of sensors, cells, catalysis, therapeutics agents, drug delivery careers, and anti-parasitic ointments (Figure 1).1,6,8 Presently, CeO2 NPs is mostly synthesized via two methods, such as physical and chemical.7,9 However, these methods utilize toxic reducing solvents posing several threats to the biodiversity and ecosystem. Moreover, the NPs obtained with such approaches are toxic and unstable, making them less efficient.9,10 Thus, recently a safe, less toxic method has been used by researchers known as Green Synthesis. This method utilizes various biological resources such as plants, microbes, or any other biological derivative.11,15 These biological extracts have a rich source of phytochemicals such asketones, amines, enzymes, and phenols, which are believed to be responsible for the reduction and stabilization of bulk salts into respective nanoparticles NPs.16,19

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

General applications of CeO2 nanoparticles.

To date various applications of green synthesized CeO2 NPs have been reported such as antimicrobial, anti-cancer, anti-larvicidal, photo-catalysis, and antioxidant therapies.16,20,22 Among other biomedical applications the antimicrobial potential is certainly the most exploited. Previously it has been reported that CeO2 NPs to display their anti-microbial actions through various mechanisms.9 But mostly CeO2 NPs kill microbes via triggering the production of an excess of reactive oxygen species in cells.9,16 However, further studies need to be conducted to fully elucidate the complete mechanism of action. Here in this review we aim to focus on the following topics. Arrays of biological resources have been exploited to date for the synthesis of CeO2 NPs. Moreover, the synthesis mechanisms along their biomedical applications are discussed with special emphasis on the antimicrobial activity.

Synthesis of CeO2 NPs

Nanoparticles are synthesized through various physico-chemical methods.5 However, both methods require toxic solvents, high temperature, and pressure, which pose threats to the environment.23,25 Moreover, higher cost, laborious downstream processing, lesser biocompatibility, instability, and low yield make them further inefficient.7,10 There is a growing need to fabricate nanostructures which have the potential to solve these problems.5,9 Presently, researchers have exploited the green method to overcome all these challenges.5 For instance, plants, microbes, and other biological products have been used as reducing and/or stabilizing agents in the fabrication of ecofriendly NPs.25 CeO2 NPs have also been synthesized using various physical, chemical, and biological methods.9 The latter is extensively utilized for its biomedical, pharmacological, and food applications due to their safe and biocompatible nature.9 Moreover, features like high yield, everlasting stability, and better morphologies can be obtained using a greener approach.7,9

Green Synthesis from Plants

Green syntheses of CeO2 NPs have been reported using plant extracts, microbial, and other biological derivatives. Plants in this regard have been the most efficient source due to their abundance, safe nature, and rich source of reducing and stabilizing agents.26,29 Various parts of plants such as leaves, flower, and stem have been used for the synthesis of CeO2 NPs.16,30,31 Till date the majority of green synthesis studies have been conducted on leaves extracts, as it is a rich source of metabolites.11,16,32,33 A broad variety of metabolites/phytochemicals in plant extracts such as ketones, carboxylic acids, phenols, and ascorbic acid are used as reduction and stabilizing agents (Figure 2). Plants based CeO2 NPs are produced through a simple approach in which bulk metal salt is mixed with the extract and the reaction completes in minutes to a few hours in ordinary lab conditions.28,29,34 The metallic salt solution is reduced into respective nanoparticles via the phytochemicals whose synthesis is confirmed firstly through color change from colorless to yellowish, brownish, or whitish, and then characterized through various spectroscopic and imaging techniques.16,29,35

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Biosynthesis: Reduction, stabilization and characterization of CeO2 nanoparticles.

Leaf extract of Moringa oleifera L was used to synthesize CeO2 NPs with spherical morphologies and size of 100 nm. The synthesized NPs showed potential antimicrobial and wound healing properties.36 Gloriosa Superba leaf extract was used as a reducing and stabilizing agent in synthesis of CeO2 NPs and has shown potential antibacterial properties.37 Hibiscus sabdariffa natural extract yielded crystalline CeO2 with a diameter of 3.9 nm.30 Spherical shaped nanoparticles of size 63.6 nm synthesized from Gel extract of medicinally important plant Aloe Barbadensis.38 The resultant CeO2 NPs showed high antioxidant potential. Green synthesis of CeO2 nanoparticles was demonstrated using Jatropha curcus leaf extract having high photocatalytic activity and a monodispersed shape of 3–5 nm.10 Spherical shaped cerium oxide nanoparticles are synthesized using Leaf extract of Oleo Europaea, with a size of 24 nm having high antimicrobial activity against both gram-negative and positive strains of bacteria.16 Origanum majorana extracts were used to synthesize CeO2 NPs, having pseudo spherical shape (20 nm). FT-IR confirmed that the reduction is attributed to the presence of different phenolic and flavonoids compounds in the extract.18 CeO2 was synthesized using Rubia cordifolia leaf fusions. Spectroscopic and microscopic analysis revealed hexagonal shaped NPs having a size of 26 nm. The biogenic CeO2 NPs also showed excellent anti-cancer potential.33 Nano rod size ranges from 5–55 nm CeO2 NPs resulted when Pedalium murex L. was added to the aqueous solution of salt at room temperature having high antibacterial activity.32 China rose petal was used as a robust bio template for the facile fabrication of novel ceria Nano sheet with a size of about 7 nm.39 The deviation in size and morphology noticed among the reported studies might be due to the different influence of reaction temperature, pH, time, concentration of salt precursor or plants extracts, and part of the plant being used.13,27,28,40 Moreover, plants based CeO2 NP’s showed excellent stability at diverse conditions. For instance, green mediated ceria NP’s remain stable at liquid solution and no physiochemical changes were observed.13,36 Similarly, biogenic CeO2 NP’s also showed high thermal stability at high temperature and remained stable for a longer period of time, which indicates their long durability and everlasting stability.27,28,33,41 Until now, various plants have been used in the biogenic synthesis of CeO2 NPs and are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

CeO2 Nanoparticles Made from Various Plants Species

S.NO Plant Name Part Characterization Shape Size (nm) FT-IR Group Ref
1. Gloriosa superba Leaf XRD, XPS, TEM, FT-IR & UV- vis Spherical 5 O-H, Ce-OH, H-O-H & O-C-O [37]
2. Hibiscus sabdariffa Flower HRTEM, SEM, XRD, XPS, EDS, FT-IR 3.9 Ce-OH [30]
3. Olive Leaf SEM, XRD, FT-IR, TGA Spherical 6 C-O, O-H & H-H [26]
4. Oleo Europaea Leaf XRD, SEM, TEM, UV- Vis, FT-IR, TGA Spherical 24 O-H, C-H & N-O [16]
5. Prosopis jujliflora Leaf UV-vis, PSA, FT-IR, XRD, XPS & HRTEMRTE Spherical 15 O-H & Ce-O [11]
6. Salvia macrosiphon Boiss Seed XRD, UV-Vis, FT-IR, FESEM & TGA Spherical ~47 Ce-O, O-Ce-O, C-H & C=O [22]
7. Acalypha indica Leaf XRD, SEM, TEM, EDS & FT-IR Spherical 25–30 O-H, Ce-OH & Ce-O-Ce [13]
8. Aloe barbadensis Leaf XRD, TEM, FT-IR & PSA Spherical 63.6 –C-H-, C=O, -C-H-, C-F, =C-H & C-Cl [38]
9. Aloe vera Leaf FT-IR, XPS, HR-TEM Spherical 2–3 –C-H, –C-C [19]
10. Rubia cordifolia Leaf UV- Vis, XRD, XPS, SEM, FT-IR, EDAX Hexagonal 26 O-H & Ce-O [33]
11. Prosopis farcta Aerial UV–Vis, PXRD, TEM, FESEM, FT-IR Spherical 30 O-H, Ce-O and N=O [58]
12. China rose Petal FESEM, FETEM, AFM, XRD & XPS Nano-sheet 7 _ [39]
13. Centella asiatica – UV-vis, DLS, SEM, HRTEM & EDS Spherical 8 _ [59]
14. Walnut Shell XRD, SEM, TEM, EDS & FT-IR Spherical 9–12 Ce-O and O-H [60]
15. Azadirachta
Indica 		Leaf UV-Vis, XRD, XPS, FESEM, TEM, HRTEM, EDS, UV-DRS & FT-IR Spherical 10–15 Ce-O-C, O-H, C-H [61]
16. Euphorbia tirucalli Stem PXRD, SEM, TEM, FT-IR & PL Flaky 37–40 -OH, -COO- and C-H [28]
17. Lemon grass Grass XRD, PL, TEM & SAED – 10–40 _ [62]
18. Leucas aspera Leaf PXRD, SEM, UV-vis, TEM, SAED Microsphere 4–13 _ [63]
19. Petroselinum crispum UV-vis, IR-, XRD, SEM, TEM Spherical 50–15 _ [14]
20. Moringa oleifera Peel UV- Vis, FT-IR, XRD & HRTEM Spherical 45 Ce-O & Ce-O-Ce [36]
21. Watermelon Fruit juice PXRD, FT-IR, UV-Vis & SEM Irregular 36 Ce-O, C=O, C-O, C-H & O-H [64]
22. Carrageenan - PXRD, FT-IR, FESEM, UV–Vis, and TGA/DTA Spherical 34 –SO3-, Ce-O, H-O-H & C–O [27]
23. Ceratonia siliqua Leaf XRD, FESEM, TEM & FT-IR Spherical 22 _ [57]
24. Stevia rebaudiana - XRD, FESEM, EDS, VSM Spherical 8–10 _ [65]
25. Salvadora persica PXRD, FT-IR, UV-Vis, TEM, FESEM, EDS Spherical 10–15 0-H, C-H, C=C, Ce-O & C-O C [20]
26. Morus nigra Fruit TEM, XRD & UV-Vis Irregular ~ 7.5 _ [35]
27. Annona muricata Fruit XRD, FT-IR, UV-DRS, FESEM _ _ _ [50]
28. Justicia adhatoda Leaf XRD, SEM, TEM, FT-IR & UV-DRS Stick-like 20–25 -OH, C-H, C=O, N=O, C=C, C-O & C-N-C [17]
29. Jatropha curcus Leaf XRD, TEM & UV-Vis Monodispersed 3 −5 _ [10]
30. Origanum majorana Leaf TEM, FESEM, XRD & FT-IR Spherical 20 O-H, C-H & C=O [18]
31. Pedalium murex Leaf XRD, FT-IR, UV-Vis DRS, SEM Nano-rod 5–55 O-H, C-H, C-O, C=O, C=N, C-N & Ce-O [32]
32. Elaeagnus angustifolia Leaf XRD, SEM, TEM, FT-IR Spherical 30–75 C-H & C=O [29]
33. Euphorbia amygdaloides TEM, SEM, XRD & UV-vis Spherical 42 – [31]
34. Orange Peel XRD, TEM, FT-IR & UV-vis Cubic structure 20–25 C-O-H or C-O-R [34]
35. Piper betle Leaf XRD, FT-IR, SEM, EDS, XPS & TEM – - N-H, N-O & C-N [66]
Open in a new tab

Green Synthesis from Microbes

Microbes also have an intrinsic potential to synthesize nanoparticles, as they are a rich source of secondary metabolites.23 Among other nanoparticles CeO2 NPs with various shapes and sizes have been synthesized in recent years from microbes (Table 2). Green synthesis of CeO2 from microbial species is a simple, reliable, cost-effective, and eco-friendly approach.42 Microbial metabolites such as enzymes, proteins, and heterocyclic derivatives play a crucial role in reducing and stabilizing of CeO2 bulk salt into respective NPs.42,43 Moreover, micro-biogenic CeO2 NPs exhibited improved stability, water dispensability, and showed high fluorescent properties and were less agglomerated.43

Table 2.

CeO2 Nanoparticles Synthesized from Various Fungus Species

S.NO Microbe Name Characterization Shape Size nm FT-IR Group Ref
1. Curvularia lunata TG/DTA, XRD, Raman, PL, FT-IR, UV-vis and TEM Spherical 5–20 _ [54]
3. Humicola sp. UV-Vis, XPS, PLS, TEM, FT-IR & XRD Spherical 12–20 Ce-O & Ce-O-Ce [43]
4. Fusarium solani FT-IR, PL, TG/DTA, FESEM, XRD, EDAX, TEM, XPS, SAED & CLSM Spherical 20–30 -OH, C-N & -C-O-C [42]
5. Aspergillus niger UV-Vis, FT-IR, XPS, XRD, TG/DTA, PL & TEM Spherical 5–20 H-O-H, O-C-O & Ce-O [21]
Open in a new tab

Aspergillus niger extract yielded cubic fluorite NPs with spherical morphology and an average size of 5 nm. FT-IR analysis revealed the presence of an hydroxyl group, carboxylic group, and phenol group which are supposed to be involved in the reduction of NPs.21 Curvularia lunata extract has also been used to synthesize spherical shaped CeO2 NPs with size ranges from 5–20 nm. Color change from white to yellow brown indicated initial reaction. The NPs were tested against microbial pathogens and showed excellent antibacterial potential. Spherical shaped CeO2 NPs of size ranges from 20–30 nm were made using Fusarium solani extract which showed effective growth inhibition and biofilm formation of pathogenic bacterial strains.42 Shadab Ali Khan observed the biosynthesis of spherical shaped (12–20 nm) CeO2 NPs by using a thermophilic fungus Humicola capping agent.43 The resultant NPs were characterized by UV, XPS, PL- Spectroscopy, TEM, FT-IR, and XRD. Moreover, these NPs showed excellent potential in treatment of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Bacterial extract has also been exploited in the fabrication of CeO2 NPs, for instance Bacillus subtilis extract yielded spherical shaped NPs with an average size of 8 nm. The bacterial mediated NPs also showed excellent antioxidant potential in vitro.44 Despite, all these applications the microbial route of synthesis has certain shortcomings, such as the high probability of pathogenicity, laborious culturing, and contamination issues. However, it offers a lot of promise in the field of nanotechnology and could become a leading avenue in nanomedicine, but is yet to be explored. Particularly, these microbial based NPs can be used in designing novel fertilizers, fabricating sterile surfaces, polymers, and medical accessories. Moreover, these biogenic NPs can also be exploited in disease management, drug synthesis, and delivery.

Green Synthesis from Biological Products

Apart from the synthesis of nanomaterial from eukaryotes and prokaryotes organisms, NPs have also synthesized from biological derivatives.23 They also play a crucial role in the reduction and stabilization of NPs.23,25 In contrast to plants and the microbial approach, bio-product based CeO2 are much safer, scalable, and have shown excellent biocompatibility.45,47 For instance, egg white protein was used in order to synthesize CeO2 NPs having size ranges from 8–17 nm with spherical morphologies.48 These NPs were characterized and confirmed by UV’s, FT-IR, TGA/DTA, and PXRD. FT-IR analysis revealed that the phenol, ether, hydroxyl, and amide groups were responsible for the reduction of these NPs. It also showed a good in vitro cytotoxicity effect towards human periodontal fibroblasts cells. Agarose is a natural matrix and has been used as a stabilizing and capping agent for CeO2 NPs. NPs obtained have spherical morphologies with a diameter of 10.5 nm. NPs were characterized using various methods, including UV, FESEM, FT-IR, TGA/DTA, PXRD, and TGA/DTA techniques. As revealed by FT-IR analysis, it was found that the hydroxyl, ether, phenol, and amide groups were involved in biosynthesis.45 Starch has also been exploited as a novel source for the synthesis of nano-ceria, with the results revealing spherical shape NPs with a diameter of 6 nm.12

Spherical shaped CeO2 NPs, with a size of 5–10 nm, were synthesized from dextran. The resultant NPs exhibited strong anti-cancer potential.46 Gum tragacanth reported by Darroudi et al49 was used in the biosynthesis of CeO2 NPs. These NPs were mono-dispersed shape with an average size range from 20–40 nm. The CeO2-NPs exhibited very low cytotoxic effects on Neuro2A cell lines, making them suitable candidates for various biomedical and pharmacological applications.49 Some other biological products which have been used for synthesis of CeO2 NPs are listed in Table 3. Despite their biological applications these biogenic NPs could be used as a promising candidate in diseases treatment, drug delivery, and packing food. Some other products have also been explored for the synthesis of CeO2 NPs which are shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Bio-Mediated CeO2 Nanoparticles from Different Sources of Biological Products

S.NO Name Characterization Shape Size nm FT-IR Group Ref
1. Egg protein UV-Vis, FESEM, FT-IR, TGA/DTA & PXRD Spherical 8–17 -OH, Ce-O, Ce-O-Ce, C-H &
N=O		 [48]
2. Honey UV-Vis, FESEM, FT-IR, TGA/DTA, EDS & PXRD Spherical 23 O-H, Ce-O,
Ce-O-Ce, Ce-O-C & N=O		 [67]
3. Agarose UV-Vis, FESEM, FT-IR, TGA/DTA & PXRD Spherical 10.5 O-H, Ce-O, Ce-O-Ce & N=O [45]
4. Starch UV-Vis, PXRD & TEM Spherical 6 _ [12]
5. Dextran TEM, DLS, XPS & UV-Vis Spherical 5–10 _ [46]
6. Polyethylene glycol HRTEM, TEM, UV-Vis & SLS-DLS Spherical ~2 _ [68]
7. Chitosan XRD, HRTEM, FT-IR, TGA/DTA & UV-Vis Spherical ~ 4 _ [69]
8. Pectin DLS, FESEM, EDSS, XRD, FT-IR, NMR, PL, FESEM, EDSS & UV-Vis Spherical ≤ 40 -OH, C-H, C=O,
-O-CH3, C-O-C, N=O & Ce-O		 [47]
9. Tannic acid FT-IR, XPS, XRD, HRTEM & UV-visible Polycrystalline ~ 10 _ [15]
Open in a new tab

Biological Activity of Green-Mediated Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles

Antimicrobial Activity of Green-Mediated Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles

In the last few years, nanotechnology-based therapies have been exploited in disease diagnostics, treatment, and formulations of novel drugs.1 For instance, the antimicrobial potential of NPs has been mostly exploited; and has showed substantial outcomes.23,24 Presently, CeO2 NPs have attracted great interest as an antimicrobial agent, in particular against bacterial pathogens.15,16,50 The exact mechanism of killing microbes is yet not clearly elucidated. However, it is proposed that CeO2 NPs mostly kill microbes via a massive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells, as shown in Figure 3.15,51 The bactericidal potential of CeO2 NPs is attributed to strong electrostatic properties, distinctive morphologies, small size, and low band energy.16,52 Due to strong electrostatic potential CeO2 NPs interact with membrane proteins thiols groups, which results in protein denaturation, membrane impermeability eventually leads to microbial death42,53 (Figure 3). Exposure to CeO2 NPs kills microbes via membrane collapse by attachment with mesosomes, malfunctioning of cellular compartments, and bio organic molecules, which ultimately lead to abnormal metabolism and physiology.16,42 Similarly, green mediated NPs killpathogens in a similar fashion and various biological species have been exploited and tested against a wide variety of microbes13,16 (Table 4). However, biogenic CeO2 NPs unique morphologies, small size and bio-compatible nature were found to be more effcient and have the potential to treat a wide range of pathogenic bacterial species.11,13,15,16,42 Moreover, it also has the potential to kill both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, but due to structural complexity of gram-negative bacteria’s membranes, it is more sensitive against gram-positive species.13,21,37,47,54 The difference in antimicrobial activity is due to differences in electrostatics between NPs and the bacterial wall, plant species, and wall composition.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Schematic representation of antibacterial activity of CeO2 nanoparticles. (1) Cell wall disruption; (2) Cell membrane disintegration; (3) Free radicals productions; (4) Loss of protein peptides; (5) DNA fragmentation; (6) Vital enzymes inhibition; (7) Loss of cellular fluids; and (8) Disruption in electron transport.

Table 4.

Various Microbes Tested Against Biogenic CeO2 Nanoparticles

S.NO Source Microbes Tested Ref
1. Olea europaea Fungus (Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium solani, and Aspergillus niger)
Bacterial sps (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumonia)		 [26]
2. Moringa oleifera S. aureus and E. coli [36]
3. Curvularia lunata Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris and Klebsiella pneumoniae [54]
4. Leucas aspera Klebsiella aerogenes, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas desmolyticum and Staphylococcus aureus [63]
5. Acalypha indica Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus [13]
6. Annona muricata Enterococcusfaecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumonia and Escherichia coli [50]
7. Gloriosa Superba Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumonia, E.coli, Proteus vulgaris, Klebsiella pneumonia, Shigella dysenteriae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [37]
8. Aspergillus niger Streptococcus pneumoniae, Bacillus subtilis, Proteus vulgaris and Escherichia coli [21]
9. Fusarium solani Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia [42]
10. Justicia adhatoda Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli [17]
11 Euphorbia amygdaloides P. acidilactici [31]
12 Pectin E. coli and B. subtilis [47]
Open in a new tab

Due to rapid evolution of the bacterial genome, bacteria have evolved to confer resistance to antimicrobial agents.55,56 Thus, in quest of a new treatment, biogenic CeO2 NPs has shown promising results in treating multi-drug resistance bacteria and could be a promising candidate against such refractory pathogenesis.26 CeO2 NPs along other conjugates have been amalgamated with various organic and inorganic hybrids to enhance the antimicrobial response.17,46 Similarly, bio-mediated CeO2 NPs kills fungi by producing a mass number of free radicals and ROS which causes distorted structure and physiology and leads to fungus death.16 However, a few studies have only been conducted on fungi. Despite the increasing knowledge on the antimicrobial activity of CeO2 NPs much remains unknown about their exact mechanism of encountering bacteria, toxicity, in vivo studies, and environmental concerns, which needs to be addressed. Moreover, the low band energy potential of CeO2 NPs could be used in fabricating sterile surfaces at hospital or lab settings and will diminish nosocomial and other acquired infections.

Other Potential Biomedical Applications

Beside anti-microbial therapies CeO2 NPs have also been used in management of other ailments.35,57 For instance, biogenic CeO2 NPs have been mostly used in treatment of various cancers, such as osteosarcoma, colon, cervical, and breast cancers.18,20,27,46,52 Results indicated that these NPs exhibited strong anticancer potential and could be used as a chemotherapeutic agent thanks to their minimal toxicity, capacity to induce apoptosis, and/or necrosis in cancer cells.46 CeO2 NPs synthesized from Origanum majorana and Ceratonia siliqua showed high antioxidant activity.18,31,57 Results showed higher expression of antioxidant enzymes which in turn eradicated free radicals and improved cellular functions.31 Furthermore, antioxidant potential was higher when compared to commercial synthetic antioxidants.18 CeO2 NPs synthesized from fruit extract of Morus nigra exhibited excellent anti-diabetic activity on L6 cell lines. The treatment was dosage dependent and NPs with lesser size resulted in higher uptake of glucose in vitro.35 Though biogenic CeO2 NPs have shown excellent pharmacological potential, however, the mechanism of action, minimum inhibitory concentration, and best possible delivery system should need to be determined. Moreover, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity should be tested in vivo models to evaluate the compatibility in both in vivo and in vitro models.

Conclusions and Future Prospects

In this paper we have reviewed the recent trends and understandings of biogenic CeO2 NPs and their pharmacological applications. Various sources such as plants, microbes, and other biological products have been discussed with the mechanism of synthesis and their biomedical applications. Due to their unique surface morphologies, crystal small nature, and biocompatible nature biogenic CeO2 NPs have got phenomenal interest in biomedical and other fields. For instance, it has been used in treating various cancers, antimicrobial, and antioxidant therapies. In particular, the green synthesized nanoparticles have shown significant antimicrobial potential against a wide range of bacterial species. The mechanism of combating such pathogens have also been elucidated and supposed to be due to the mass production of reactive oxygen species and deactivation of scavenging enzymes. The ROS impedes the membranes, disrupts the cellular compartments, and disintegrates the bio organic molecules and hampers the associated functions and ultimately causes death. It has also shown promising results against multi-drug bacteria, and could be a potential antimicrobial agent in future against such refractory pathogens. However, further studies should conduct in vivo models, to reveal the full mechanism alongside any side-effects. Moreover, it has also shown excellent anticancer and antioxidant potential in vitro setups, but their toxicity and dosage are yet unknown, which needs to be addressed. Despite their role in various therapies their mechanism of synthesis needs to be optimized, whereas in vivo evaluation as well as toxicity should be further screened.

Abbreviations

CeO2 NPs, cerium oxide nanoparticles; DGA, differential thermal analysis; DSL, dynamic light scattering; EDS, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy; FESEM, field emission scanning electron microscopy; FT-IR, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; HRTEM, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy; PL, photoluminescence; PXRD, powder X-ray diffraction; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SLS, static light scattering; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; TGA, thermal gravimetric analysis; UV-Vis, UV-visible spectroscopy; XPS X-ray, photoelectron spectrometry; XRD, X-ray diffraction.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest for this work.

References

  • 1.Kubik T, Bogunia-Kubik K, Sugisaka M. Nanotechnology on duty in medical applications. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2005;6(1):17–33. doi: 10.2174/1389201053167248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bhushan B. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. Springer; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jianrong C, Yuqing M, Nongyue H, et al. Nanotechnology and biosensors. Biotechnol Adv. 2004;22(7):505–518. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smith DM, Simon JK, Baker Jr JR Jr. Applications of nanotechnology for immunology. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(8):592–605. doi: 10.1038/nri3488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mohanraj V, Chen Y. Nanoparticles-a review. Trop J Pharm Res. 2006;5(1):561–573. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Das S, Dowding JM, Klump KE, et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: applications and prospects in nanomedicine. Nanomedicine. 2013;8(9):1483–1508. doi: 10.2217/nnm.13.133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.He L, Su Y, Lanhong J, et al. Recent advances of cerium oxide nanoparticles in synthesis, luminescence and biomedical studies: a review. J Rare Earths. 2015;33(8):791–799. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60486-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Walkey C, Das S, Seal S, et al. Catalytic properties and biomedical applications of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Environ Sci. 2015;2(1):33–53. doi: 10.1039/C4EN00138A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rajeshkumar S, Naik P. Synthesis and biomedical applications of cerium oxide nanoparticles–a review. Biotechnol Rep. 2018;17:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2017.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Magudieshwaran R, Ishii J, Raja KCN, et al. Green and chemical synthesized CeO2 nanoparticles for photocatalytic indoor air pollutant degradation. Mater Lett. 2019;239:40–44. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.172 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arunachalam T, Karpagasundaram M, Rajarathinam N. Ultrasound assisted green synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles using Prosopis juliflora leaf extract and their structural, optical and antibacterial properties. Mater Sci Poland. 2017;35(4):791. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Darroudi M, Sarani M, Kazemi Oskuee R, et al. Green synthesis and evaluation of metabolic activity of starch mediated nanoceria. Ceram Int. 2014;40(1):2041–2045. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.07.116 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kannan S, Sundrarajan M. A green approach for the synthesis of a cerium oxide nanoparticle: characterization and antibacterial activity. Int J Nanosci. 2014;13(03):1450018. doi: 10.1142/S0219581X14500185 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Korotkova A, Borisovna PO, Aleksandrovna GI, et al. “Green” synthesis of cerium oxide particles in water extracts petroselinum crispum. Curr Nanomater. 2019;4(3):176–190. doi: 10.2174/2405461504666190911155421 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kumar KM, Mahendhiran M, Diaz MC, et al. Green synthesis of Ce3+ rich CeO2 nanoparticles and its antimicrobial studies. Mater Lett. 2018;214:15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.11.097 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maqbool Q, Nazar M, Naz S, et al. Antimicrobial potential of green synthesized CeO(2) nanoparticles from Olea europaea leaf extract</sub>. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;11:5015–5025. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S113508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nithya P, Murugesan B, Sonamuthu J, Samayanan S, Mahalingam S. Facile biological synthetic strategy to morphologically aligned CeO 2/ZrO 2 core nanoparticles using Justicia adhatoda extract and ionic liquid: enhancement of its bio-medical properties. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2017;178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nezhad S, Haghi A, Homayouni M. Green synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticle using Origanum majorana L. leaf extract, its characterization and biological activities: green synthesis of nanoparticle. Appl Organomet Chem. 2019;34:e5314. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dutta D, Mukherjee R, Patra M, et al. Green synthesized cerium oxide nanoparticle: a prospective drug against oxidative harm. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;147:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.07.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miri A, Darroudi M, Sarani M. Biosynthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles and its cytotoxicity survey against colon cancer cell line. Appl Organomet Chem. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gopinath K, Karthika V, Sundaravadivelan C, et al. Mycogenesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles using Aspergillus niger culture filtrate and their applications for antibacterial and larvicidal activities. J Nanostructure Chem. 2015;5(3):295–303. doi: 10.1007/s40097-015-0161-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elahi B, Mirzaee M, Darroudi M, et al. Preparation of cerium oxide nanoparticles in salvia macrosiphon boiss seeds extract and investigation of their photo-catalytic activities. Ceram Int. 2018;45(4):4790–4797. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.11.173 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nadeem M, Tungmunnithum D, Hano C, et al. The current trends in the green syntheses of titanium oxide nanoparticles and their applications. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2018;11(4):492–502. doi: 10.1080/17518253.2018.1538430 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nadeem M, Abbasi BH, Younas M, et al. A review of the green syntheses and anti-microbial applications of gold nanoparticles. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2017;10(4):216–227. doi: 10.1080/17518253.2017.1349192 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Srikar SK, Giri DD, Pal DB, et al. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: a review. Green Sustain Chem. 2016;6(01):34. doi: 10.4236/gsc.2016.61004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Maqbool Q, Nazar M, Maqbool A, et al. CuO and CeO2 nanostructures green synthesized using olive leaf extract inhibits the growth of highly virulent multidrug resistant bacteria. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9(987). doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 27.Nourmohammadi E, Kazemi Oskuee R, Hasanzadeh L, et al. Cytotoxic activity of greener synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles using carrageenan towards a WEHI 164 cancer cell line. Ceram Int. 2018;44(16):19570–19575. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.201 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Malleshappa J, Nagabhushana H, Prashantha SC, et al. Eco-friendly green synthesis, structural and photoluminescent studies of CeO2: eu3+nanophosphors using E. tirucalli plant latex. J Alloys Compd. 2014;612:425–434. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.101 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Singh A, Hussain I, Singh NB, et al. Uptake, translocation and impact of green synthesized nanoceria on growth and antioxidant enzymes activity of Solanum lycopersicum L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;182:109410. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thovhogi N, Diallo A, Gurib-Fakim A, et al. Nanoparticles green synthesis by Hibiscus sabdariffa flower extract: main physical properties. J Alloys Compd. 2015;647:392–396. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.076 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nadaroglu H, Onem H, Alayli Gungor A. Green synthesis of Ce2O3 NPs and determination of its antioxidant activity. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2017;11(4):411–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nithya P, Murugesan B, Sonamuthu J, Samayanan S, Mahalingam S. [BMIM] PF6 ionic liquid mediated green synthesis of ceramic SrO/CeO2 nanostructure using Pedalium murex leaf extract and their antioxidant and antibacterial activities. Ceram Int. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sisubalan N, Ramkumar VS, Pugazhendhi A, et al. ROS-mediated cytotoxic activity of ZnO and CeO2 nanoparticles synthesized using the Rubia cordifolia L. leaf extract on MG-63 human osteosarcoma cell lines. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(11):10482–10492. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0003-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sultan Irshad M, Aziz MH, Fatima M et al. Green synthesis, cytotoxicity, antioxidant and photocatalytic activity of CeO2 nanoparticles mediated via orange peel extract (OPE). Mater Res Express. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rajan A, Rajan A, John A, Philip D. Green synthesis of CeO2 nanostructures by using Morus nigra fruit extract and its antidiabetic activity. AIP Conf Proc. 2019;2105:020008. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tammineni S, Roopan S. Photocatalytic and antibacterial properties of phytosynthesized of CeO2 NPs using Moringa oleifera peel extract. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2016;161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Arumugam A, Karthikeyan C, Hameed AS et al. Synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles using Gloriosa superba L. leaf extract and their structural, optical and antibacterial properties. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Priya G, Kanneganti A, Kumar KA, Rao KV, Bykkam S. Bio synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles using aloe barbadensis miller gel. Int J Sci Res Publ. 2014;4. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Qian J, Chen F, Zhao X, et al. China rose petal as biotemplate to produce two-dimensional ceria nanosheets. J Nanopart Res. 2011;13(12):7149–7158. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0626-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nadaroglu H, Onem H, Gungor AA. Green synthesis of Ce2O3 NPs and determination of its antioxidant activity. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2016;11(4):411–419. doi: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zamani A, Marjani AP, Alimoradlu K. Walnut shell-templated ceria nanoparticles: green synthesis, characterization and catalytic application. Int J Nanosci. 2018;17(06):1850008. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kunga Sugumaran V, Gopinath K, Palani NS et al. Plant pathogenic fungus F. solani mediated biosynthesis of Nanoceria: antibacterial and antibiofilm activity. RSC Adv. 2016;6:42720–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Khan SA, Ahmad A. Fungus mediated synthesis of biomedically important cerium oxide nanoparticles. Mater Res Bull. 2013;48(10):4134–4138. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.06.038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pitchumani Krishnaveni M, Annadurai G. Biosynthesis of nanoceria from bacillus subtilis: characterization and antioxidant potential. Res J Life Sci. 2019;5(3):644. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kargar H, Ghasemi F, Darroudi M. Bioorganic polymer-based synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles and their cell viability assays. Ceram Int. 2015;41(1):1589–1594. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.095 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Alpaslan E, Yazici H, Golshan NH, et al. pH-dependent activity of dextran-coated cerium oxide nanoparticles on prohibiting osteosarcoma cell proliferation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2015;1(11):1096–1103. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Patil SN, Paradeshi JS, Chaudhari PB, et al. Bio-therapeutic potential and cytotoxicity assessment of pectin-mediated synthesized nanostructured cerium oxide. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2016;180(4):638–654. doi: 10.1007/s12010-016-2121-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kargar H, Ghazavi H, Darroudi M. Size-controlled and bio-directed synthesis of ceria nanopowders and their in vitro cytotoxicity effects. Ceram Int. 2015;41(3, Part A):4123–4128. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.11.108 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Darroudi M, Sarani M, Kazemi Oskuee R, et al. Nanoceria: gum mediated synthesis and in vitro viability assay. Ceram Int. 2014;40(2):2863–2868. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sebastiammal S, Mariappan A, Neyvasagam K, Fathima AL. Annona muricatainspired synthesis of CeO2 nanoparticles and their antimicrobial activity. Mater Today. 2019;9:627–632. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M, et al. Comparison of the mechanism of toxicity of zinc oxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles based on dissolution and oxidative stress properties. ACS Nano. 2008;2(10):2121–2134. doi: 10.1021/nn800511k [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Abbas F, Iqbal J, Jan T, et al. Differential cytotoxicity of ferromagnetic Co doped CeO2 nanoparticles against human neuroblastoma cancer cells. J Alloys Compd. 2015;648:1060–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.195 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tong G-X, Du -F-F, Liang Y, et al. Polymorphous ZnO complex architectures: selective synthesis, mechanism, surface area and Zn-polar plane-codetermining antibacterial activity. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1(4):454–463. doi: 10.1039/C2TB00132B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Munusamy S, Bhakyaraj K, Vijayalakshmi L, Stephen A, Narayanan V Synthesis and characterization of cerium oxide nanoparticles using Curvularia lunata and their antibacterial properties. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng. 2014;2(1):318. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Davies J, Wright GD. Bacterial resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Trends Microbiol. 1997;5(6):234–240. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(97)01033-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Livermore DM. Bacterial resistance: origins, epidemiology, and impact. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(Supplement_1):S11–S23. doi: 10.1086/344654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Javadi F, Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME, Baghani M, et al. Biosynthesis, characterization of cerium oxide nanoparticles using Ceratonia siliqua and evaluation of antioxidant and cytotoxicity activities. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(6):065408. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab08ff [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Miri A, Sarani M. Biosynthesis, characterization and cytotoxic activity of CeO2 nanoparticles. Ceram Int. 2018;44(11):12642–12647. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.063 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sankar V, SalinRaj P, Athira R, et al. Cerium nanoparticles synthesized using aqueous extract of Centella asiatica: characterization, determination of free radical scavenging activity and evaluation of efficacy against cardiomyoblast hypertrophy. RSC Adv. 2015;5(27):21074–21083. doi: 10.1039/C4RA16893C [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zamani A, Marjani AP, Alimoradlu K. Walnut shell-templated ceria nanoparticles: green synthesis, characterization and catalytic application. Int J Nanosci. 2017;17(06):1850008. doi: 10.1142/S0219581X18500084 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sharma JK, Srivastava P, Ameen S, et al. Phytoconstituents assisted green synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles for thermal decomposition and dye remediation. Mater Res Bull. 2017;91:98–107. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.03.034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Maensiri S, Labuayai S, Laokul P, et al. Structure and optical properties of CeO2 nanoparticles prepared by using lemongrass plant extract solution. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2014;53(6S):06JG14. doi: 10.7567/JJAP.53.06JG14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Malleshappa J, Nagabhushana H, Sharma SC, et al. Leucas aspera mediated multifunctional CeO2 nanoparticles: structural, photoluminescent, photocatalytic and antibacterial properties. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2015;149:452–462. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.04.073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Reddy Yadav LS, Manjunath K, Archana B, et al. Fruit juice extract mediated synthesis of CeO2 nanoparticles for antibacterial and photocatalytic activities. Eur Phys J Plus. 2016;131(5):154. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2016-16154-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Khatami M, Sarani M, Mosazadeh F, et al. Nickel-doped cerium oxide nanoparticles: green synthesis using stevia and protective effect against harmful ultraviolet rays. Molecules. 2019;24(24):4424. doi: 10.3390/molecules24244424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pinheiro D, Sunaja Devi KR, Jose A, et al. Experimental design for optimization of 4-nitrophenol reduction by green synthesized CeO2/g-C3N4/Ag catalyst using response surface methodology. J Rare Earths. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jre.2019.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Darroudi M, Hoseini SJ, Kazemi Oskuee R, et al. Food-directed synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles and their neurotoxicity effects. Ceram Int. 2014;40(5):7425–7430. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.089 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Qi L, Fresnais J, Muller P, et al. Interfacial activity of phosphonated-PEG functionalized cerium oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2012;28(31):11448–11456. doi: 10.1021/la302173g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kaushik A, Solanki PR, Pandey MK, et al. Cerium oxide-chitosan based nanobiocomposite for food borne mycotoxin detection. Appl Phys Lett. 2009;95(17):173703. doi: 10.1063/1.3249586 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Nanomedicine are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES