Skip to main content
Biophysical Reviews logoLink to Biophysical Reviews
letter
. 2020 Jul 17;12(4):785–787. doi: 10.1007/s12551-020-00739-9

Cardiomyocyte renewal in the failing heart: lessons from the neonate?

Wouter Derks 1, Francesca Murganti 1, Olaf Bergmann 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7429587  PMID: 32681468

The renewal capacity of the heart is extremely limited, with less than 1% cardiomyocyte turnover per year in an adult human heart (Bergmann et al. 2015). This process is thought to be mediated by the proliferation of existing cardiomyocytes rather than by differentiating stem cells (Eschenhagen et al. 2017; Senyo et al. 2013).

One of the hallmarks of heart failure is the loss of functional cardiomyocytes. Whether cardiac disease supports cardiomyocyte renewal is a matter of ongoing debate (Eschenhagen et al. 2017); however, many studies have reported increased cell cycle activity after cardiac injury (Senyo et al. 2013; Vujic et al. 2018).

Intriguingly, a failing heart shows some resemblance to a neonatal heart (Table 1). As observed in the fetal heart (Sturzu et al. 2015), neonatal cardiomyocytes can still duplicate, thereby regenerating the injured heart (Porrello et al. 2011, 2013). During postnatal maturation, cardiomyocytes undergo marked changes in metabolism, redox state, sarcomeric protein expression, and morphology (Guo and Pu 2020; Karbassi et al. 2020). Throughout this process, cardiomyocytes gradually lose their proliferative capacity (Alkass et al. 2015; Karbassi et al. 2020). In failing hearts, certain conditions, including ischemia, hypertrophy, and atrophy, can induce the reactivation of fetal gene programs, leading to partial reversal of morphological differentiation and metabolic maturation processes (Kubin et al. 2011; Taegtmeyer et al. 2010).

Table 1.

Myocardial characteristics of the neonatal, adult, and failing heart

Neonatal heart Adult heart Failing heart
Extracellular matrix

- Soft

- Low number of fibroblasts

- Neonatal fibroblast subtype

- Stiff

- High number of fibroblasts

- Adult fibroblast subtype

- Extensive remodeling of ECM

- Increased number of fibroblasts

- Activated myofibroblasts

Metabolism

- Glycolysis

- Low number of mitochondria

- Oxidative phosphorylation

- High number of mitochondria

- Switch towards glycolysis

- Mitochondrial dysfunction

Cardiomyocyte morphology

- No T-tubules

- Low length-to-width ratio

- Rod shape

- T-Tubules

- High length-to-width ratio

- Increase in cardiomyocyte size

- Further enlargement of cardiomyocyte

- Loss of sarcomere organization

- Cardiomyocyte structural degeneration

Contractility

- Low contractility

- Low β-MHC to α-MHC ratio†

- High contractility

- High β-MHC to α-MHC ratio†

- ssTnI to cTnI switch

- Reduced contractility

- Decreased β-MHC to α-MHC ratio†

Cell cycle

- Cell cycle activity

- Proliferation of cardiomyocytes

- Mostly mononucleated diploid cardiomyocytes

- Very low cell cycle activity and cardiomyocyte proliferation

- Mostly multinucleated and polyploid cardiomyocytes

- Increased cell cycle activity (relative to non-diseased adult hearts)

- Some evidence for increased cardiomyocyte proliferation

- Increase in nuclear ploidy

Human-specific isoform switch

Nevertheless, we know that increased cell cycle activity in diseased and injured hearts does not lead to efficient regeneration, most likely because cell cycle activity mainly leads to polyploidy and not to substantial proliferation of existing cardiomyocytes (Herget et al. 1997; Hesse et al. 2012; Meckert et al. 2005) (Table 1). However, recent work suggests that mononuclear diploid cardiomyocytes, which are mainly present in early neonatal hearts, retain their capacity to divide (Bersell et al. 2009; Kuhn et al. 2007; Patterson et al. 2017). Based on these findings, the “subpopulation” theory emerged, stating that mononucleated diploid cardiomyocytes are a reservoir to generate new cardiomyocytes (Gan et al. 2019; Patterson and Swift 2019). If this theory was true, only a small fraction of cardiomyocytes would be able to divide in the diseased heart, making it difficult to generate sufficient numbers of new cardiomyocytes to support heart regeneration.

Mature adult cardiomyocytes are rod-shaped, with a high length-to-width ratio, develop invaginations in the form of T-tubules, and are densely packed with myofibrils and mitochondria (Karbassi et al. 2020) (Table 1). However, successful mitosis and cytokinesis require extensive morphological changes, including the disassembly of sarcomeres, to allow symmetric assembly of the mitotic spindle and formation of the contractile ring (Ahuja et al. 2004; Green et al. 2012). Thus, without substantial remodeling, successful cytokinesis seems to be incompatible with the size and shape of adult cardiomyocytes. Importantly, loss of sarcomere organization and disrupted ultrastructure of cardiomyocytes have been documented in patients with failing hearts (Hein et al. 2009), suggesting that one requisite for cardiomyocyte division is present in the diseased heart. A recent study by Gabisonia et al. showed that dedifferentiation of mature cardiomyocytes can be triggered by the delivery of microRNA-199a in large mammals, leading to reentry into the cell cycle. However, these cells resembled a pool of poorly differentiated cardiomyocytes with a myoblastic phenotype, which results in fatal arrhythmias (Gabisonia et al. 2019), demonstrating that a reversal of cardiomyocyte maturation needs to be temporally and spatially tightly controlled to efficiently regenerate the heart.

In concert with the cellular changes in the myocyte, the composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM) is an important factor in regulating cardiomyocyte maturation and cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity (Bassat et al. 2017; Dixon et al. 2019; Morikawa et al. 2017; Yahalom-Ronen et al. 2015). Several components of the neonatal ECM, such as agrin (Bassat et al. 2017) and periostin (Kuhn et al. 2007), have been implicated in augmented cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity. Remodeling of the ECM in cardiac pathologies is controlled by cardiac fibroblasts, and a recent study revealed that a switch in fibroblast subtype from a neonatal to adult state controls cardiomyocyte maturation and cell cycle activity (Wang et al. 2020). ECM synthetized by postnatal cardiac fibroblasts inhibited cardiomyocyte proliferation and increased cardiomyocyte binucleation, indicating that during postnatal maturation the ECM becomes a non-permissive environment for mitotic rounding and cytokinesis of cardiomyocytes (Wu et al. 2020). As the phenotype and number of fibroblasts fundamentally change during aging and in heart disease (Bergmann et al. 2015; Kanisicak et al. 2016), it will be important to investigate how the ECM composition and crosstalk between fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes can be manipulated to devise new regenerative strategies for diseased hearts.

There are some unexpected similarities between regenerative neonatal hearts and adult failing hearts. However, only limited regeneration is observed in the failing heart. It is evident that cardiac regeneration does not depend solely on one factor, but rather on the interplay of changes occurring in the cardiomyocyte and its microenvironment. Future research needs to show how to orchestrate these factors to not only mimic distinct neonatal features of regeneration (e. g., metabolic switch, disassembly of sarcomeric organization) but also achieve complete regeneration of an adult heart.

Acknowledgments

O.B. received support from the Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Karolinska Institutet, Swedish Research Council, Ragnar Söderberg Foundation, and ÅkeWiberg Foundation.

Funding Information

Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Ahuja P, Perriard E, Perriard JC, Ehler E. Sequential myofibrillar breakdown accompanies mitotic division of mammalian cardiomyocytes. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:3295–3306. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alkass K, Panula J, Westman M, Wu TD, Guerquin-Kern JL, Bergmann O. No evidence for cardiomyocyte number expansion in preadolescent mice. Cell. 2015;163:1026–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bassat E, et al. The extracellular matrix protein agrin promotes heart regeneration in mice. Nature. 2017;547:179–184. doi: 10.1038/nature22978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergmann O, et al. Dynamics of cell generation and turnover in the human heart. Cell. 2015;161:1566–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bersell K, Arab S, Haring B, Kuhn B. Neuregulin1/ErbB4 signaling induces cardiomyocyte proliferation and repair of heart injury. Cell. 2009;138:257–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dixon IMC, Landry NM, Rattan SG. Periostin reexpression in heart disease contributes to cardiac interstitial remodeling by supporting the cardiac myofibroblast phenotype. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1132:35–41. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-6657-4_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eschenhagen T, et al. Cardiomyocyte regeneration: a consensus statement. Circulation. 2017;136:680–686. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gabisonia K et al (2019) MicroRNA therapy stimulates uncontrolled cardiac repair after myocardial infarction in pigs. Nature. 10.1038/s41586-019-1191-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Gan P, Patterson M, Sucov HM (2019) Cardiomyocyte polyploidy and implications for heart regeneration. Annu Rev Physiol. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034618 [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Green RA, Paluch E, Oegema K. Cytokinesis in animal cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012;28:29–58. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guo Y, Pu WT. Cardiomyocyte maturation: new phase in development. Circ Res. 2020;126:1086–1106. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hein S, et al. Deposition of nonsarcomeric alpha-actinin in cardiomyocytes from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy or chronic pressure overload. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2009;14:e68–e75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Herget GW, Neuburger M, Plagwitz R, Adler CP. DNA content, ploidy level and number of nuclei in the human heart after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;36:45–51. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(97)00140-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hesse M, et al. Direct visualization of cell division using high-resolution imaging of M-phase of the cell cycle. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1076. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kanisicak O, et al. Genetic lineage tracing defines myofibroblast origin and function in the injured heart. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12260. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Karbassi E, Fenix A, Marchiano S, Muraoka N, Nakamura K, Yang X, Murry CE. Cardiomyocyte maturation: advances in knowledge and implications for regenerative medicine. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17:341–359. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0331-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kubin T, et al. Oncostatin M is a major mediator of cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and remodeling. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9:420–432. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuhn B, del Monte F, Hajjar RJ, Chang YS, Lebeche D, Arab S, Keating MT. Periostin induces proliferation of differentiated cardiomyocytes and promotes cardiac repair. Nat Med. 2007;13:962–969. doi: 10.1038/nm1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meckert PC, Rivello HG, Vigliano C, Gonzalez P, Favaloro R, Laguens R. Endomitosis and polyploidization of myocardial cells in the periphery of human acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;67:116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morikawa Y, Heallen T, Leach J, Xiao Y, Martin JF. Dystrophin-glycoprotein complex sequesters Yap to inhibit cardiomyocyte proliferation. Nature. 2017;547:227–231. doi: 10.1038/nature22979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Patterson M, Swift SK. Residual diploidy in polyploid tissues: a cellular state with enhanced proliferative capacity for tissue regeneration? Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28:1–13. doi: 10.1089/scd.2019.0193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Patterson M, et al. Frequency of mononuclear diploid cardiomyocytes underlies natural variation in heart regeneration. Nat Genet. 2017;49:1346–1353. doi: 10.1038/ng.3929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Olson EN, Sadek HA. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science. 2011;331:1078–1080. doi: 10.1126/science.1200708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Porrello ER, et al. Regulation of neonatal and adult mammalian heart regeneration by the miR-15 family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:187–192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208863110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Senyo SE et al (2013) Mammalian heart renewal by pre-existing cardiomyocytes. Nature. 10.1038/nature11682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  26. Sturzu AC, et al. Fetal mammalian heart generates a robust compensatory response to cell loss. Circulation. 2015;132:109–121. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Taegtmeyer H, Sen S, Vela D. Return to the fetal gene program: a suggested metabolic link to gene expression in the heart. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1188:191–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05100.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vujic A, et al. Exercise induces new cardiomyocyte generation in the adult mammalian heart. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1659. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04083-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang Y, et al. Single-cell analysis of murine fibroblasts identifies neonatal to adult switching that regulates cardiomyocyte maturation. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2585. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16204-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wu CC, Jeratsch S, Graumann J, Stainier D (2020) Modulation of mammalian cardiomyocyte cytokinesis by the extracellular matrix. Circ Res. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.316303 [DOI] [PubMed]
  31. Yahalom-Ronen Y, Rajchman D, Sarig R, Geiger B, Tzahor E (2015) Reduced matrix rigidity promotes neonatal cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation, proliferation and clonal expansion. Elife 4. 10.7554/eLife.07455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Biophysical Reviews are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES