Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics logoLink to Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
. 2020 Jul 2;54(5):695–703. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00178-4

Ultrasonography in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis of Hand and Wrist Joints: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Sundeep Malla 1, Surabhi Vyas 1,, Ashu Seith Bhalla 1, Uma Kumar 2, Sandeep Kumar 3, Arun Kumar Gupta 1
PMCID: PMC7429602  PMID: 32850035

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of ultrasonography (USG) including power Doppler in detecting hand and wrist joint changes in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare USG findings with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and Methods

Thirty-four patients diagnosed as RA by 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria; with the onset of symptoms within last one year, were included in the study after institute ethical clearance and informed consent to undergo USG and contrast-enhanced MRI of the dominant affected hand. Second to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints and wrist joints (total nine joints) were evaluated for synovitis, erosions along with tenosynovitis. USG and MRI features were compared; agreement on the two imaging modalities as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography compared to MRI (gold standard) was calculated.

Results

One hundred thirty-six MCP, 136 PIP and 34 wrist joints (total 306 joints) and 136 flexor tendons were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of USG for diagnosing synovitis was 78.6%, 91.1%, 86.1%, 85.8%, 86.3%; for erosions 67.2%, 97.5%, 84.8%, 90.5%, 91.5%; for tenosynovitis 86.5%, 100%, 100%, 92.3% and 94.8% respectively. The overall agreement between USG and MRI for detection of synovitis was achieved in 83% joints and for erosions in 89.5% joints.

Conclusion

In early RA, USG was nearly as effective in diagnosing features of joint and tendon sheath involvement, with relatively better performance of USG for tenosynovitis. The performance of USG in diagnosing erosions was limited likely due to difficult access of three-dimensional joint structure.

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis, Synovitis, Ultrasonography, Tenosynovitis, Erosions, Magnetic resonance imaging, Early disease

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune systemic disorder characterised by inflammatory synovitis of peripheral joints. The disease affects females more commonly than males with prevalence ranging from 0.1 to 5% [1, 2]. Timely initiation of appropriate therapy and treatment monitoring is of paramount importance as research has shown that treatment during the window period may prevent further joint damage and possibly reverse the same [3, 4].

Ultrasonography (USG) has been increasingly used to assess the articular and extra-articular musculoskeletal manifestations of the disease. It has been used not only to diagnose and quantify the joint disease but also in follow-up and evaluation of treatment response in these patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard in the evaluation of RA, especially when the histopathological correlation is uncommon [5]. However, USG is a more widely available imaging tool that can be used to evaluate early articular and extra-articular manifestations and has demonstrated a role in joint abnormality assessment [69].

Therefore, this study was performed to evaluate the use of USG in detecting hand and wrist joint changes in early RA and to compare the USG findings with that of MRI.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

Prospective crossectional study.

Patient Population

Thirty-four consecutive patients of RA, presenting to the rheumatology outpatient department from April 2014 to April 2016, aged more than 12 years, with a score of more than 6/10 (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria) [10], with the onset of symptoms within the past one year were included in the study to undergo USG and contrast-enhanced MRI of the dominant affected (with more number of joints involved clinically) hand and wrist. Clinical involvement was defined as the presence of either swelling with tenderness or swelling alone over a joint. Second to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints and wrist joints (total nine joints) were evaluated for synovitis and erosions along with tenosynovitis of the second to fifth flexor tendons.

Image Acquisition and Analysis

All ultrasonography examinations, were performed by one radiologist (S.V. with 15 years of experience or S.M. with 2 years of experience), blinded to the MRI findings, who was trained in musculoskeletal sonography. The examinations were done on Aixplorer supersonic ultrasound system using a linear (7.5–15 MHz) probe, jelly mound and minimal pressure. The patients were in sitting position with forearms supported in front of them to maximize comfort. All the patients were evaluated for by ultrasound for synovitis, erosions and tenosynovitis using the following definitions.

Synovitis Uncompressible hypoechoic intracapsular area extending to fill the angle between the periarticular bones which may bulge over the line linking the top of the articular bones. Power Doppler findings were also recorded, however, these were not separately analysed.

Bone Erosion Break in the cortical outline of bone in the area adjacent to the joint, visualized in two planes measuring at least 2 mm.

Tenosynovitis Hypoechoic or anechoic area in the tenosynovium surrounding the tendon.

MRI for all patients was performed on a 1.5 T Philips Achieva system using a dedicated, small 8 channel surface coil. The hand was placed in the superman position or in supine hand by side if the former was found uncomfortable. The MRI protocol included STIR TSE (coronal), T1W TSE (coronal), DWI (coronal), multi fast field echo (mFFE 0.5(coronal), T2W Spectral Attenuated Inversion Recovery (SPAIR-axial) and T1W TSE (axial). These were followed by intravenous gadolinium (dose 0.1 mmol/kg body weight). T1W TSE Post-contrast (coronal and axial) images were then obtained. The hand was evaluated for the presence of synovial thickening, synovitis, erosion and tenosynovitis on both the modalities. Standardized MRI definitions, summarized below were used as provided by the OMERACT RAMRIS [10].

Synovitis An area of synovium that shows above normal post-gadolinium enhancement, the thickness of which is greater than the width of the normal synovium (more than 0.5 mm).

Bone erosion A sharply marginated periarticular bony lesion, visible in two planes with a cortical break seen in at least one plane, appearing hypointense on T1W images, hyperintense on T2W images and shows enhancement on post-gadolinium images.

Tenosynovitis An area of T2 hyperintense signal in the tendon sheath and/or increased thickness or contrast enhancement of the tendon sheath synovium.

Statistical Analysis

The data was recorded in a predesigned proforma and entered on excel spreadsheet in Microsoft excel [11]. The data were analysed using STATA 12.1 software [12]. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean and standard deviation for data sets without any extreme values. Diagnostic test [13] was used to calculate the agreement as well as the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of USG for evaluation of erosions as compared to MRI, which was taken as the gold standard. Similarly, the agreement, as well as the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination and ultrasonography, was calculated as compared to MRI using the diagnostic test.

Results

Out of a total of 34 patients, 28 were female and 6 were males, with a mean age of 35.7 + 10.1 years (range 19–65 years). 136 MCP, 136 PIP and 34 wrist joints (total 306 joints, 9 per hand) and 136 flexor tendons (4 per hand) were evaluated.

Synovitis

Synovitis was found in 104 joints on clinical examination, 133 joints on ultrasonography and 145 joints on MRI. The most commonly involved joints with synovitis were the wrist, MCP 2, MCP 3 and MCP 5 in decreasing order. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of USG for diagnosing synovitis was 78.6%, 91.1%, 86.1%, 85.8%, 86.3%. Agreement between ultrasonography and MRI was achieved in 83% joints, whereas it was achieved for 81.4% joints between clinical examination and MRI [Table 1].

Table 1.

Distribution of synovitis among hand and wrist joints on clinical examination (CE), ultrasonography (USG) and MRI with performance parameters of CE and USG

Joints No. of joints Agreement (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Diagnostic accuracy
USG MRI CE USG-MRI CE-MRI USG CE USG CE USG CE USG CE USG CE
MCP2 17 19 13 88.2 76.5 84.2 63 93.3 93 94.1 92 82.3 67 88.2 76
MCP3 19 18 16 85.3 82.3 88.9 77.8 81.2 87.5 84.2 87.5 86.7 77.8 85.3 82.3
MCP4 10 13 8 79.4 79.4 61.5 53.8 90.5 95.2 80 87.5 79.2 76.9 79.4 79.4
MCP5 13 19 10 73.5 73.5 63 52.6 93 100 92 100 66.7 62.5 76.5 73.5
PIP2 9 10 9 91.2 91.2 80 80 95.8 95.8 88.9 88.9 92 92 91.2 91.2
PIP3 12 13 9 70.6 70.6 77 46.1 90.5 85.7 83.3 66.7 86.4 72 85.3 70.6
PIP4 10 11 4 79.4 79.4 72.7 36.4 91.3 100 80 100 87.5 76.7 85.3 85.3
PIP5 11 10 5 85.3 85.3 80 50 87.5 100 72.7 100 91.3 82.8 85.3 85.3
Wrist 32 32 30 94.1 94.1 100 93.7 100 100 100 100 100 50 100 94.1
Total 133 145 104 83 81.4 78.6 61.5 91.1 93.4 86.1 91.4 85.8 82.4 86.3 82

Erosions

USG detected erosions in 46 joints, whereas MRI detected in 60 joints. Out of the individual joints evaluated, the highest number of erosions were detected in the wrist (25 joints), followed by MCP 3 (9 joints), MCP 2 (8 joints) and MCP 5 (7 joints) on MRI. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing erosions was 67.2%, 97.5%, 84.8%, 90.5%, 91.5% respectively. The overall agreement between ultrasonography and MRI for the detection of erosions was achieved in 89.5% joints [Table 2].

Table 2.

Distribution of erosions among hand and wrist joints on ultrasonography (USG) and MRI with USG performance parameters

Joints No. of joints on USG No. of joints on MRI USG-MRI agreement (%) Sensitivity of USG (%) Specificity of USG (%) PPV USG (%) NPV USG (%) Diagnostic accuracy USG (%)
MCP2 4 8 82.3 57.5 96.1 75 83.3 82.3
MCP3 7 9 82.3 55.6 92 71.4 85.2 82.3
MCP4 4 4 88.2 50 93 50 93.3 88.2
MCP5 4 7 91.2 57.1 100 100 90 91.2
PIP2 1 1 100 100 100 100 100 100
PIP3 3 2 97.1 100 96.9 66.7 100 97.1
PIP4 1 2 97.1 50 100 100 97 97.1
PIP5 1 2 97.1 50 100 100 97 97.1
Wrist 21 25 88.2 84 100 100 69.2 88.2
Total 46 60 89.5 67.2 97.5 84.8 90.5 91.5

Tenosynovitis

Out of the 136 flexor tendon sheaths examined, tenosynovitis was detected in 45 tendons on ultrasonography and 52 tendons on MRI. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing tenosynovitis was 86.5%, 100%, 100%, 92.3% and 94.8% respectively.

Discussion

Imaging in RA is a challenging field with limited evidence regarding clear cut indications in diagnosis and follow up. For early detection, various imaging modalities may help before the onset of irreversible changes, which can benefit the patients by preventing significant long term morbidity and disability. Our study evaluated 34 patients with early RA using clinical examination, ultrasonography and MRI. 82% of these were females with a F:M ratio of 4.5:1 which is similar to other Indian data [14]. The mean age was 35.7 years with 50% of the patients in the age group of 31–40 years. Most of our patients were young (< 60 years), and small joints of the hand are more affected in these patients [15, 16].

Synovitis is one of the earliest manifestations of the disease. The sensitivity of USG in detecting synovitis was more than that of clinical examination (78.6% vs 60%) with no loss of specificity (Fig. 1). Previous studies have also shown similar results and have also suggested that the low sensitivity of clinical examination may account for the deterioration of RA patients despite clinically adequate control of the disease [5, 17]. The present study shows the sensitivity of USG in diagnosing signs of synovial inflammation to be 78.6% compared to MRI (gold standard). This is lower than the results of a previous study where the sensitivity of ultrasound was found to be almost equal to MRI [18]. This can be due to a higher resolution of 1.5 T MRI with a multichannel extremity coil used in our study, compared to a 0.5 T MR scanner used in the study by Schmidt WA et al. We also found six joints where synovitis was seen on greyscale USG but not on MRI, which could be due to fibrotic pannus, better visualised on USG. However, all our patients were of early RA, wherein the presence of fibrotic pannus is relatively uncommon. A similar discrepancy was also in a previous study [19].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Correlation of joint involvement on USG and MRI. A young female patient with pain in the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints and wrist right on the right side. Clinical examination (a) and AP radiograph (b) of the right hand revealed no abnormality. Longitudinal USG (c) through MCP4 joint shows hypoechoic synovial proliferation (arrow), with similar findings on post-contrast T1W fat-suppressed axial and coronal MRI images (d) as enhancing synovium

Erosions are an important manifestation of the joint disease in RA and are included in the diagnostic criteria for RA. Their presence predicts a more severe clinical course and increased morbidity [20]. Literature has already shown a higher sensitivity of USG in diagnosing erosions as compared to clinical examination and radiography, in part due to inherent advantages of the multidimensional capability of USG compared to a two-dimensional projection of a radiograph [5] (Fig. 2). In the present study, USG had a sensitivity of 67% in detecting erosions with a high specificity of more than 97% (Fig. 3). The increased sensitivity from previously reported of around 60% can be attributed to improvement in USG technology [5]. The sensitivity was highest for PIP joints followed by MCP 2 joints, likely due to better accessibility as compared to MCP joints [19, 21]. USG also had two false positives, where erosions in PIP joints were not seen on MRI. The slice thickness of MRI sequences was 3 mm, which may be suboptimal for small erosions at PIP joints. The highest number of erosions were detected in wrist followed by MCP3 and MCP 2 joints as these are the earliest joints to be involved in RA. This is especially relevant with the abbreviated 12 joint and 7 joint ultrasonography scores which reduce the duration of examination without compromising the sensitivity and specificity [22].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Erosions missed on radiography with correlation on USG and MRI. A young male patient with wrist pain and morning stiffness. Wrist AP radiograph (a) showed mildly reduced radiocarpal joint space and periarticular osteopenia. Sonography at the distal radius (b) showed an erosion (arrow) with adjacent synovitis. The erosion was confirmed on two planes. Corresponding axial T1W MRI (c) and post-contrast fat-saturated T1W MRI (d) image showed a well- defined cortical defect on the volar surface of the distal end of the radius (white arrow) that appears hypointense on T1W image with contrast enhancement

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Limitation of USG in the diagnosis of erosions. A young female patient with positive rheumatoid factor, presented with localized pain in MCP3 joint of the left hand. Sonography (a) showed a normal MCP3 joint with no erosions or synovitis. Corresponding T2W (b) and T1W (c) MRI images showed the presence of a small erosion (arrow) on the radial aspect of MCP3 with associated soft tissue thickening. The location of erosion at the lateral or medial metacarpal heads may make it inaccessible to USG probe

Tenosynovitis of the flexor tendon may be seen in more than 50% of patients of known RA and has also shown to be an early predictor of the disease [23, 24] (Figs. 4, 5). We evaluated 136 flexor tendons for tenosynovitis with USG and MRI, and the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography were found to be 86.5% and 100% respectively. In two of our subjects, tenosynovitis was the only imaging finding. These subjects had arthritis of large joints with no affliction of the small joints of the hand. Positive serology in the form of elevated RA factor and anti-CCP was helpful in making a diagnosis. It is shown by previous researchers that tenosynovitis of the common flexor tendons can be the earliest manifestation of RA and that tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons of the second finger is significantly associated with progression to RA [23, 24].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Tenosynovitis as the earliest manifestation of RA. A middle-aged female with swelling along the base of right thumb and wrist. RF factor and ESR were elevated. Radiograph of the right hand (a) showed mild soft tissue thickening at medial aspect of the wrist. Transverse sonography (b) of the first extensor compartment tendons showed hypoechoic soft tissue along the synovial sheath of abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis. MEDIC coronal (c) and post-contrast axial (d) MRI images of wrist showed marked hyperintense soft tissue suggesting tenosynovitis of these tendons

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Post-processing tools on MRI. Maximum intensity projections (MIP) generated from post-contrast images of the hand of a healthy subject (a, b) and a known case of rheumatoid arthritis (c, d). The MIP images show the extent of synovial and tenosynovial involvement with a single image, making it potentially useful in a busy clinical practice

Conclusion

In the evaluation of early RA, the sensitivity of USG was highest for detection of tenosynovitis (86.5%), followed by synovitis (78.6%) and erosions (67.2%). The overall agreement between USG and MRI was found to be more than 80%, and thus USG may serve as a good alternative to MRI for diagnosis of early RA.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of the Mr. Lalit Gupta and Mr. Udit, technical staff at the MRI facility, Department of Radiodiagnosis, AIIMS, New Delhi.

Author Contributions

SV, ASB, AKG concepts. SM, SV, ASB UK design. SV, ASB definition of intellectual content. SM, SV, SK literature search. SM, UK, SK clinical studies. SM, SV data acquisition and statistical analysis. SM, SV, ASB data analysis. SM, SV, SK, AKG manuscript preparation. SV, ASB, SK, AKG manuscript editing. SV, ASB, UK, SK manuscript review.

Funding

None.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard statement

The study has been approved by the Institute ethics committee.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants as per the protocol of the Institute ethics committee.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Sundeep Malla, Email: sundeepmalla1047@gmail.com.

Surabhi Vyas, Email: surabhi_vyas@yahoo.com.

Ashu Seith Bhalla, Email: ashubhalla1@yahoo.com.

Uma Kumar, Email: umaakumar@yahoo.co.in.

Sandeep Kumar, Email: drsandeepkumar20@gmail.com.

Arun Kumar Gupta, Email: arunk676@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.Spector TD. Rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatic Diseases Clinics of North America. 1990;16(3):513–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peschken CA, Esdaile JM. Rheumatic diseases in North America’s indigenous peoples. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1999;28(6):368–391. doi: 10.1016/s0049-0172(99)80003-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van Steenbergen HW, Huizinga TWJ, van der Helm-van Mil AHM. The preclinical phase of rheumatoid arthritis: What is acknowledged and what needs to be assessed? Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2013;65(9):2219–2232. doi: 10.1002/art.38013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kraan MC, Versendaal H, Jonker M, Bresnihan B, Post WJ, t’Hart BA, et al. Asymptomatic synovitis precedes clinically manifest arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1998;41(8):1481–1488. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199808)41:8<1481::AID-ART19>3.0.CO;2-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Narvestad E, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Jensen KE, et al. Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination. Arthritis Research and Therapy. 2006;8(2):R52. doi: 10.1186/ar1904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Joshua F, Lassere M, Bruyn GA, Szkudlarek M, Naredo E, Schmidt WA, et al. Summary findings of a systematic review of the ultrasound assessment of synovitis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2007;34(4):839–847. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Freeston JE, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, Hensor EMA, Stewart SP, Emery P. A diagnostic algorithm for persistence of very early inflammatory arthritis: the utility of power Doppler ultrasound when added to conventional assessment tools. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010;69(2):417–419. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.106658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Constant É, Marotte H, Pallot-Prades B, Amouzougan A, Collet P, Court L, et al. 3D ultrasound compared to magnetic resonance imaging and 2D ultrasound in assessing rheumatoid arthritis activity: A 6-month pilot study. Joint Bone Spine. 2015;82(3):212–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mills DM, Cao K, Thiele R, Patwardhan KA. Volumetric ultrasound and computer-assisted analysis at the point-of-care: a musculoskeletal exemplar. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:2318–2322. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kay J, Upchurch KS. ACR/EULAR 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria. Rheumatology Oxfard England. 2012;51(Suppl 6):vi5–9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Microsoft Excel - Work together on Excel spreadsheets [Internet]. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://office.live.com/start/excel.aspx
  • 12.Stata: Software for Statistics and Data Science [Internet]. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.stata.com/
  • 13.Schulzer M. Diagnostic tests: A statistical review. Muscle and Nerve. 1994;17(7):815–819. doi: 10.1002/mus.880170719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Malaviya AN, Gogia SB. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in India-how and by whom: Results from a speciality clinic-use of low-dose methotrexate (MTX) was inexplicably suboptimal. Clinical Rheumatology. 2016;35(9):2163–2173. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3283-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ahlmén M, Svensson B, Albertsson K, Forslind K, Hafström I, BARFOT Study Group Influence of gender on assessments of disease activity and function in early rheumatoid arthritis in relation to radiographic joint damage. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010;69(1):230–233. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.102244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Deal CL, Meenan RF, Goldenberg DL, Anderson JJ, Sack B, Pastan RS, et al. The clinical features of elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison with younger-onset disease of similar duration. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1985;28(9):987–994. doi: 10.1002/art.1780280905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ohrndorf S, Fischer IU, Kellner H, Strunk J, Hartung W, Reiche B, et al. Reliability of the novel 7-joint ultrasound score: Results from an inter- and intraobserver study performed by rheumatologists. Arthritis Care Research. 2012;64(8):1238–1243. doi: 10.1002/acr.21679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schmidt WA, Schicke B, Ostendorf B, Scherer A, Krause A, Walther M. Low-field MRI versus ultrasound: which is more sensitive in detecting inflammation and bone damage in MCP and MTP joints in mild or moderate rheumatoid arthritis? Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2013;31(1):91–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, O’Connor P, McGonagle D, Pease C, et al. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2000;43(12):2762–2770. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2762::AID-ANR16>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Welsing PM, van Gestel AM, Swinkels HL, Kiemeney LA, van Riel PL. The relationship between disease activity, joint destruction, and functional capacity over the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2001;44(9):2009–2017. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2009::AID-ART349>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chaiamnuay S, Lopez-Ben R, Alarcón GS. Ultrasound of target joints for the evaluation of possible inflammatory arthropathy: associated clinical factors and diagnostic accuracy. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2008;26(5):875–880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Fritz J, Wolf KJ, et al. Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1999;42(6):1232–1245. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)42:6<1232::AID-ANR21>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eshed I, Feist E, Althoff CE, Hamm B, Konen E, Burmester G-R, et al. Tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons of the hand detected by MRI: An early indicator of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2009;48(8):887–891. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gray RG, Gottlieb NL. Hand flexor tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Prevalence, distribution, and associated rheumatic features. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1977;20(4):1003–1008. doi: 10.1002/art.1780200414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Indian Orthopaedic Association

RESOURCES