Skip to main content
BMC Infectious Diseases logoLink to BMC Infectious Diseases
. 2020 Aug 14;20:601. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05327-6

Perinatal listeriosis patients treated at a maternity hospital in Beijing, China, from 2013–2018

Chunyun Li 1, Huihui Zeng 2, Xin Ding 3, Yi Chen 3, Xiaowei Liu 3, Li Zhou 3, Xin Wang 3, Yumei Cheng 3, Shanshan Hu 4, Zheng Cao 5, Ruixia Liu 6,, Chenghong Yin 1,
PMCID: PMC7429786  PMID: 32799811

Abstract

Background

Listeriosis is a rare but severe foodborne infectious disease. Perinatal listeriosis is often associated with septicemia, central nervous system (CNS) infection, and serious adverse pregnancy outcomes (miscarriage and neonate death). Here we report the characteristics and outcomes of perinatal listeriosis cases treated over 6 years at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (BOGH), the largest maternity hospital in China.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of laboratory-confirmed, pregnancy-associated listeriosis cases treated from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018. The clinical manifestations, laboratory results, perinatal complications and outcomes (post-natal follow-up of 6 months) were investigated.

Results

In BOGH, 12 perinatal listeriosis cases were diagnosed based on Listeria monocytogenes positive culture, including 10 single pregnancies and 2 twin pregnancies. The corresponding incidence of pregnancy-associated listeriosis was 13.7/100,000 deliveries. Among those cases, four pregnant women and four newborns had septicemia, and two of the neonates with septicemia also suffered CNS infection. All the maternal patients recovered. Two inevitable miscarriages and four fetal stillbirths occurred. Of the eight delivered newborns, six survived, and two died within 2 days from birth. None of the survivors had neurological sequelae during a 6-month follow-up. The overall feto-neonatal fatality rate was 57.1%; notably, this rate was 100% for infections occurring during the second trimester of pregnancy and only 14.3% for those occurring in the third trimester.

Conclusions

Perinatal listeriosis is associated with high feto-neonatal mortality, and thus, a public health concern. Additional large-scale studies are needed to strengthen the epidemiological understanding of listeriosis in China.

Keywords: Listeria monocytogenes, Listeriosis, Foodborne infectious disease, Perinatal, Maternal, Neonate, Septicemia, Central nervous system infection

Background

Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) is a facultative anaerobic Gram-positive bacterium that causes severe foodborne illnesses associated with substantial mortality (20–30%) [1]. This pathogen, a ubiquitous bacterium in nature, can be isolated from soil, stream water, vegetables, fruits, raw meat, milk products, ready-to-eat food products, and even refrigerated processed foods because Listeria can survive and grow at wide ranges of pH and temperatures as well as high salt concentrations [24].

L. monocytogenes is mainly transmitted through the consumption of contaminated foods. After crossing the intestinal mucosal barrier, L. monocytogenes disseminate within the circulation and show preferential accumulation in the central nervous system (CNS) and the placenta [5]. Increased progesterone levels during pregnancy weaken the cellular immunity, which makes expectant mothers particularly susceptible to microorganisms such as like L. monocytogenes [6, 7]. The infection risk for pregnant women is 12–20 times higher than that for the general population [8, 9]. The reported incidence of pregnancy-related listeriosis has ranged 4.3–25 cases per 100,000 births [1013]. In systematic reviews, pregnancy-associated cases have accounted for 20.7–43% of all listeriosis cases worldwide [14, 15]. In China, a human listeriosis surveillance system was established in 2013. However, to date, listeriosishas not become a notifiable disease in China. Two recent reports showed that in China, perinatal listeriosis accounts for 41.1–52% of clinical listeriosis cases, and thus, the burden of pregnancy-related listeriosis in the country is not light [16, 17]. Pregnant women infected with L. monocytogenes are often asymptomatic or have only nonspecific clinical symptoms such as gastrointestinal and flu-like symptoms. However, many of these patients experience adverse pregnancy outcomes, including fetal loss, preterm birth, and neonatal listeriosis.

This report retrospectively reviewed all laboratory-confirmed, pregnancy-associated listeriosis cases treated from January 2013 to December 2018 at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (BOGH), a high-level maternal and child health care hospital with 660 beds in Beijing, China.1 In the present study, we detail the clinical characteristics and outcomes of these L. monocytogenes infected perinatal patients.

Methods

The number of births in BOGH exceeds 14,000 every year. We retrospectively analyze the clinical data of all laboratory-confirmed, pregnancy-associated L. monocytogenes infections treated from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018, based on a list generated from the Department of Disease Prevention and Control and Nosocomial Infection of BOGH. Recording of the clinical information of all patients of BOGH in an electronic database began in 2013.

Pregnancy-associated listeriosis cases includes illness with an onset during pregnancy or within the first 2 weeks of the postpartum period as well as illness in the neonate between birth and 4 weeks of age [1]. All the confirmed cases were based on the isolation of L. monocytogenes from a normally sterile site (e.g., blood or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) or products of conception (e.g., placental or fetal tissue), with the presence of compatible clinical symptoms. A perinatal listeriosis case was defined based on isolation of L. monocytogenes from a clinical sterile sample from the pregnant woman or foetus, stillborn, and newborn aged < 4 weeks [9]. If L. monocytogenes was isolated in samples from both the mother and neonate, a single case was counted. Neonatal cases were divided into early onset (diagnosed between birth and day 6) and late onset (diagnosed between 7 and 28 days) [1, 18]. L. monocytogenes CNS infection was diagnosed if L. monocytogenes was isolated from a patient’s CSF or when a patient had neurological symptoms (e.g., altered consciousness, seizures, nuchal rigidity, or focal neurological symptoms, and an increased white blood cell [WBC] count in the CSF) and blood culture showing L. monocytogenes. If a patient did not meet the criteria for CNS infection diagnosis but L. monocytogenes was found on blood culture, the patient was considered to have septicemia [19].

The culture, isolation, and identification of L. monocytogenes was performed using the traditional blood agar plating method followed by automated biochemical confirmation (bioMérieux VITEK 2 COMPACT, France) with visible colonies [19].

We defined ‘stillbirth’ as death of the fetus between 24 and 41 weeks of gestation, and fetal loss before 24 weeks was defined as an inevitable miscarriage. Furthermore, we calculated the overall neonatal fatality of pregnancy-associated listeriosis, including miscarriages, stillbirths and newborn deaths.

We used descriptive statistics in this study. Where appropriate, data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Results

Basic characteristics of perinatal listeriosis cases in the considered period

We identified 12 cases of pregnancy-associated listeriosis from overall total of 87,644 deliveries, for an incidence of 13.7/100,000 births. These included 12 maternal and 14 neonatal infections with L. monocytogenes, and the characteristics of these cases are summarized in Table 1. The annual and seasonal numbers of pregnancy-associated listeriosis cases are shown in Fig. 1a and b, respectively. Ten cases (10/12 ≈ 83.33%) occurred during summer and fall months (i.e. June to November) during 2013 to 2018. The median age of these women was 29 years (range, 25–41 years).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 12 maternal and 14 neonatal cases of pregnancy-associated listeriosis

Group Maternal Neonatal
Total, n 12 14
Median age (min, max), y 29 (25, 41)
Median gestation at delivery (min, max), wk 29.0 (20.0, 38.1)
Underlying disease, n (%)
 GDM 2 (16.67)
 SLE 1 (8.33)
Clinical manifestations, n (%)
 Fever 11 (91.67)
 Gastrointestinal symptoms 5 (41.67)
 Flu-like symptoms 3 (25)
Laboratory findings
 Peripheral WBC, mean ± SD, 109/L 21.13 ± 6.55
 Neutrophils, %, median (min, max) 82.55 (74.3, 92.6)
 Mononuclear cells, mean ± SD, 109/L 0.98 ± 0.34
Mortality, n (%) 0 8 (57.1)

Abbreviations: max, maximum; min, minimum; GDM gestational diabetes mellitus, SLE systemic lupus erythematosus, WBC white blood cell, SD standard deviation

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The annual and seasonal numbers of pregnancy-associated listeriosis cases from 2013 to 2018. a Annual number of perinatal listeriosis infections. b Seasonal number of perinatal listeriosis cases. Spring (March, April, May), summer (June, July, August), fall (September, October, November), and winter (December, January and February)

Clinical characteristics of maternal listeriosis cases

The clinical characteristics of the 12 maternal listeriosis cases are described in Table 2. Among them, 10 were singleton pregnancies and 2 were twin pregnancies (i.e., cases 2 and 9). Six cases were infected with L. monocytogenes in the second trimester pregnancy (between 14 and 27 weeks), and the other six were infected in the third trimester pregnancy (between 28 and 41 weeks). Their median gestational age at the time of infection was 29.3 weeks (range, 20.0–38.1 weeks). Eleven of the twelve maternal listeriosis patients had prenatal fever (38–39.3 °C), and 3 of 12 had flu-like symptoms. Five patients had gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea and abdominal pain). Various obstetrical symptoms were reported among the 12 pregnant women, including decreased fetal movement (n = 5), intrauterine fetal death (n = 2), premature rupture of the membranes (PROM, n = 2), and vaginal bleeding (n = 1). All of the symptomatic women received antibiotic therapy, and eight patients received only cephalosporin antibiotics initially.

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of 12 maternal listeriosis cases

No Gestation (wk) Obstetrical manifestations Culture sites Initial antibiotic Switched antibiotic Maternal complications and outcomes
Maternal blood Placental tissue Cervical secretion Others
1 31.3 decreased fetal movement 3d; fetal distress; Tmax:39.3 °C (−) (+) / / metronidazole + amoxicillin 4d No premature delivery; C-section; severe meconium staining of amniotic fluid; recovered
2 24.4 decreased fetal movement 3d; lower abdominal pain; twin pregnancy; PROM; Tmax:38.5 °C (−) (+) (+) / cefuroxime 3d No stillbirth; recovered
3 20.0 abdominal pain; fetal movement disappear 3d; chill; Tmax:38.7 °C (−) (+) (−) hydrothorax, ascite, amniotic fluid (+) amoxicillin 3d No inevitable miscarriage; induced labor; recovered
4 34.3 decreased fetal movement 1d; uterine contraction; fetal distress; headache; Tmax:38.8 °C (−) (+) (−) / cefmetazole 1d moxifloxacin 6d premature delivery; severe meconium staining of amniotic fluid; recovered
5 26.0 lower abdominal pain 17 h; PROM; fetal distress; septicemia; Tmax:39 °C (+) (+) (−) / cefuroxime 3d metronidazole 3d stillbirth; induced labor; recovered
6 36.1 decreased fetal movement 2d; fetal distress; polyhydramnios; Tmax:38 °C (−) (+) / / cefuroxime 3d No premature delivery; C-section; severe meconium staining of amniotic fluid; recovered
7 38.1 fetal distress; Tmax:39.2 °C (−) (+) / / metronidazole + ceftriaxone 4d No normal labor; postpartum hemorrhage; C-section; severe meconium staining of amniotic fluid; recovered
8 21.7 fever15d; intrauterine fetal death1d; lower abdominal pain; headache; Tmax:39.1 °C (−) (+) (−) / cefuroxime 8d + cefdinir 5d moxifloxacin 6d inevitable miscarriage; induced labor; recovered
9 35.6 fetal distress; threatened prematurity; twin pregnancy; septicemia; Tmax:38.4 °C (+) (−) / / ceftriaxone 5d No premature delivery; postpartum hemorrhage; recovered
10 24.9 fever7d; fetal distress; abdominal pain; septicemia; Tmax:39.3 °C (+) (+) (−) / ceftriaxone 7d PNG 4d stillbirth; recovered
11 35.4 fetal distress; decreased fetal movement 1d; afebrile (−) (+) / / cefuroxime 3d No premature delivery; recovered
12 27.3 fever 2w; prematurity; vaginal bleeding; uterine contraction; septicemia; Tmax:39 °C (+) (+) (−) / clindamycin + ceftriaxone 2d azithromycin + PNG 7d premature delivery; postpartum hemorrhage; C-section; mild meconium staining of amniotic fluid; recovered

Abbreviations: Tmax maximal temperature, PROM premature rupture of the membranes, C-section cesarean section, PNG penicillin-G

Among the 12 maternal patients, 1 progressed to normal labor, 5 experienced fetal loss and 6 had premature deliveries. Additional complications included postpartum hemorrhage in 3 patients, meconium staining in 5 patients, and the need for induced labor in 3 patients. Caesarean section (C-section) was performed in four cases, due to abnormal fetal heart rates. None of the women were diagnosed with CNS infection. One-third (4/12) had septicemia. All of the maternal patients eventually recovered after delivery with no sequelae.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of listeriosis infections in offspring

The clinical characteristics and outcomes of all 14 offspring are summarized in Table 3. Nine of the fourteen offspring (64.29%) were female, and the median birth weight was 1305 g (range, 380–3565 g). Six of the fourteen neonates were found to have confirmed L. monocytogenes infection based on microbiological methods (laryngeal swab: 2; blood + laryngeal swab: 2; blood + CSF + laryngeal swab: 2). Two neonates were diagnosed with CNS infection, and four had septicemia. No late-onset cases of newborn/infant listeriosis were observed. Two inevitable miscarriages and four fetal stillbirths occurred, and the other eight neonates presented with fetal distress. Four newborns received intubation. Of the eight delivered newborns, six survived, and two died within 2 days after birth. None of the survivors had neurological sequelae throughout a 6-month follow-up.

Table 3.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes among the 14 neonates in the 12 pregnancy-associated listeriosis cases

No. Birth weight (g) Presentation Culture sites Initial antibiotic Switched antibiotic Intubation Complications Outcomes
Feto-neonatal blood CSF Laryngeal swab
1 1610 fetal distress; Apgar 6; SpO2 92% on ambient air; rash (−) / (+) NA NA Yes preterm birth; neonatal asphyxia; pneumonia; hypoglycemia, DIC; septic shock; renal failure; hyperlactacidemia; metabolic acidosis deceased day 2; infant listeriosis
2.1 & 2.2 740/560 fetal distress; decreased fetal movement / / / / / / stillbirth; induced labor death
3 440 fetal distress; decreased fetal movement / / (+) / / / inevitable miscarriage; induced labor infant listeriosis
4 2275 fetal distress; Apgar 9; SOB; SpO2 80% on ambient air; rash (+) (+) (+) NA NA Yes septicemia; preterm birth; CNS infection; meningitis; intrauterine infection; low birth weight; hypoglycemia; DIC; sepsis; thrombocytopenia; myoardial infarction survived; infant listeriosis
5 1000 fetal distress / / / / / / stillbirth death
6 2565 fetal distress; Apgar 10; SpO2 95% on ambient air (+) / (+) cefotoxime + PNG 5d meropenem + PNG 9d No septicemia; preterm birth; intrauterine infection survived; infant listeriosis
7 3565 fetal distress; Apgar 8; SpO2 88% on ambient air; meconium aspiration (+) / (+) piperacillin 3d ceftazidime + vancomycin 12d Yes septicemia; intrauterine infection; pneumonia; hyperlactacidemia; neonatal encephalopathy; anemia; myoardial infarction; thrombocytopenia survived; infant listeriosis
8 380 intrauterine fetal death / / / / / / inevitable miscarriage induced labor
9.1 2730 fetal distress; Apgar 8; SOB; SpO2 92% on ambient air (−) (−) (−) cefepime + PNG 10d No No preterm birth; pneumonia; patent foramen ovale survived
9.2 2285 fetal distress; Apgar 7; SOB; SpO2 90% on ambient air (+) (+) (+) meropenem + PNG 19d No No preterm birth; septicemia; low birth weight; CNS infection; meningitis; liver function lesion, pneumonia; metabolic acidosis; hypoglycemia; anemia, neutropenia; patent foramen ovale; patent ductus arteriosus survived; infant listeriosis
10 620 fetal distress / / / / / / stillbirth death
11 2810 fetal distress; Apgar 10; SpO2 96% on ambient air; cyanosis (−) / (−) PNG + latamoxef 7d cefepime 7d No preterm birth; pneumonia; neonatal infection; hypocalcemia; neonatal jaundice; patent foramen ovale; hydronephrosis survived
12 820 fetal distress; Apgar 8; SpO2 94% on ambient air / / (−) / / Yes extremely low birth weight; preterm birth; hyperlactacidemia; NRDS deceased day 1

Abbreviations: NA not available, C-section cesarean section, SpO2 oxygen saturation from pulse oximetry, SOB shortness of breath, DIC disseminated intravascular coagulation, NRDS neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, PNG penicillin

Discussion

The incidence of perinatal listeriosis in BOGH was 13.7/100,000 deliveries, which was consistent with previously reported incidence rates [1013]. In our study, half of the pregnancy-associated listeriosis cases (6/12, cases 2, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12) suffered from listeriosis in the second trimester of pregnancy, and all seven offspring of these patients died. Among the other six perinatal cases (cases 1, 4, 6, 7, 9, and 11; 7 newborns in total), six newborns survived without sequelae, despite CNS infection in two infants and septicemia in four infants, while one (case 1, delivered at week 31.3) died 2 days after birth. Consistent with the previous studies [13, 20], in this study, the prognosis of neonate from maternal listeriosis cases occurring during late pregnancy was quite excellent even if the infants were infected with L. monocytogenes, whereas the pregnancy outcomes of perinatal cases infected prior to the 28th week of gestation were very bad. The overall cases-fatality rate among the offspring was 57.1%, which was close to the range of 32.7–50.7% reported in two recent systematic reviews in the mainland of China [16, 17]. Accordingly, the feto-neonatal listeriosis mortality rate in China is very high, which was in contrast to the low child mortality estimated by de Noordhout et al. [14] in 2010.

We found that 66.67% (8/12) of maternal patients received only cephalosporin antibiotics initially, because cephalosporins are the preferred empirical therapy for obstetric infections with nonspecific clinical symptoms in China. However, while L. monocytogenes strains are susceptible to many antibiotics (e.g., ampicillin and penicillin G [PNG]), they are not sensitive to cephalosporins [2124]. Previous studies demonstrated that delayed diagnosis and inappropriate antibiotic administration decrease the probability of a favorable outcome among L. monocytogenes infection cases [20, 25]. In China, there are still no national guidelines for the treatment of listeriosis. According to Hof et al. [22], when listeriosis is a likely diagnosis, the use of ampicillin, PNG, or vancomycin provides empiric coverage for L. monocytogenes. However, empiric therapy for bacterial meningitis with ampicillin may not be necessary for children beyond the neonatal period [26]. Ampicillin or PNG, with or without aminoglycoside or gentamicin, is recommended for all forms of listeriosis. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole can be used as an alternative treatment. Two to three weeks of therapy is sufficient for most forms of listeriosis. Rhombencephalitis with abscess formation in the CNS may require 4-week therapy [25, 27]. Notably though, researchers recently found high resistance levels of L. monocytogenes to many antibiotics (ampicillin, PNG, tetracycline, cefotaxime, etc.) among clinical and food isolates, which represents a serious problem for the treatment of listeriosis [28, 29].

Listeriosis is a typical foodborne disease, which means food contamination is the major source of infection. Data from Beijing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that among the 12 maternal patients in the present study, positive culture of the same strain of L. monocytogenes from samples obtained from the patient’s kitchen was observed only for case 5. Even for this case though, various food sources of L. monocytogenes made it difficult to trace the pathogen and identify the specific food source.

Inspection reports have shown that the estimated prevalence of L. monocytogenes in Chinese food products is 4.42% [30], and in the retail markets of Beijing 15.20% of the raw pork was found to be contaminated [31]. Thus, food safety regarding L. monocytogenes contamination remains a problem in China. Additionally, processed food and pasteurized dairy products stored in a refrigerator are also vulnerable to recontamination, because L. monocytogene can grow very well at 4 °C [32, 33]. Currently, there are no diet guidelines for the prevention of L. monocytogenes infection in China. Therefore, improving awareness of relevant food safety among the people at higher risk of L. monocytogenes infection, especially pregnant women and immune-compromised individuals, can facilitate prevention. Because doctors are the most credible source of health information for pregnant patients, campaigns by doctors communicating healthy diet habits education (e.g., avoiding direct eat consumption of even pasteurized dairy products and cooked foods stored in the refrigerator without recooking, and eating out less often) are recommended for pregnant women.

Conclusions

There are several limitations in this study. First, this was a retrospective study over a protracted timespan of 6 years, and no stored samples were available for further research, such as microbial typing. Second, the lack of epidemiological investigations does not allow for identification of the food sources of L. monocytogenes in these cases and the formulation of clear recommendations. Third, the sample size was relatively small. Data large-scale investigation of pregnancy-associated listeriosis is needed to further understanding the demographic distribution of this dangerous infection in China.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the medical record department staff of BOGH for their support. We also thank our colleagues and the expert panel members, without whom this initiative could not have come to fruition.

Abbreviations

CNS

Central nervous system

BOGH

Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital;

L. monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

WBC

White blood cell

PNG

Penicillin-G

SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus

GDM

Gestational diabetes mellitus

C-section

Caesarean section

PROM

Premature rupture of the membranes

NA

Not available

SpO2

Oxygen saturation from pulse oximetry

SOB

Shortness of breath

DIC

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

NRDS

Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

max

Maximum

min

Minimum

SD

Standard deviation

Authors’ contributions

CHY and RXL conceived and designed the study. CYL, RXL, HHZ, XD, YC, XWL, LZ, XW, SSH, YMC, and ZC collected the data. CYL and RXL finished the literature search, data interpretation, and writing. All the authors critically reviewed this report and approved the final version.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data are not publicly available, but as the medical staff at the hospital, we have access to it. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The need for ethics approval of our study was deemed unnecessary according to the national regulations – “The Regulations of Ethical Reviews of Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (2016)”2 issued by National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Also, the need for ethics approval was waived by the Ethics Committee of Capital Medical University Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. The data used in this study were anonymized before analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Contributor Information

Ruixia Liu, Email: liuruixia1982@163.com.

Chenghong Yin, Email: yinchh@ccmu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Thomas J, Govender N, McCarthy KM, Erasmus LK, Doyle TJ, Allam M, et al. Outbreak of Listeriosis in South Africa associated with processed meat. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(7):632–643. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Buchanan RL, Gorris LGM, Hayman MM, Jackson TC, Whiting RC. A review of Listeria monocytogenes: an update on outbreaks, virulence, dose-response, ecology, and risk assessments. Food Control. 2017;75:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.12.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cabal A, Pietzka A, Huhulescu S, Allerberger F, Ruppitsch W, Schmid D. Isolate-based surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes by whole genome sequencing in Austria. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2282. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jordan K, McAuliffe O. Listeria monocytogenes in foods. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2018;86:181–213. doi: 10.1016/bs.afnr.2018.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rolhion N, Cossart P. How the study of listeria monocytogenes has led to new concepts in biology. Future Microbiol. 2017;12:621–638. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2016-0221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leber A, Zenclussen ML, Teles A, Brachwitz N, Casalis P, El-Mousleh T, et al. Pregnancy: tolerance and suppression of immune responses. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;677:397–417. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-869-0_25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Poulsen KP, Czuprynski CJ. Pathogenesis of listeriosis during pregnancy. Anim Health Res Rev. 2013;14:30–39. doi: 10.1017/S1466252312000242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Craig AM, Dotters-Katz S, Kuller JA, Thompson JL. Listeriosis in pregnancy: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2019;74(6):362–368. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Elinav H, Hershko-Klement A, Solt I, et al. Pregnancy-associated listeriosis: many beliefs, few facts. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(10):1128–1130. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00302-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Filipello V, Amato E, Gori M, Huedo P, Ciceri G, Lomonaco S, et al. Epidemiology and molecular typing of pregnancy-associated Listeriosis cases in Lombardy, Italy, over a 10-year period (2005–2014) Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2017;2017:6479121. doi: 10.1155/2017/6479121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jeffs E, Williman J, Brunton C, Gullam J, Walls T. The epidemiology of listeriosis in pregnant women and children in New Zealand from 1997 to 2016: an observational study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8221-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.de Valk H, Tourdjman M, Leclercq A, Maury M, Moura A, Laurent E, et al. Changes in epidemiology and surveillance of listeriosis in France. International symposium on problems of Listeriosis. Paris: Institut Pasteur; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Elinav H, Hershko-Klement A, Valinsky L, Jaffe J, Wiseman A, Shimon H, et al. Pregnancy-associated listeriosis: clinical characteristics and geospatial analysis of a 10-year period in Israel. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:953–961. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Noordhout CM, Devleesschauwer B, Angulo FJ, Verbeke G, Haagsma J, Kirk M, et al. The global burden of listeriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:1073–1082. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70870-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mateus T, Silva J, Maia RL, Teixeira P. Listeriosis during pregnancy: a public health concern. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2013:851712. doi: 10.1155/2013/851712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fan Z, Xie J, Li Y, Wang H. Listeriosis in mainland China: a systematic review. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;81:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Feng Y, Wu S, Varma JK, Klena JD, Angulo FJ, Ran L. Systematic review of human listeriosis in China, 1964–2010. Tropical Med Int Health. 2013;18:1248–1256. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cekmez F, Tayman C, Saglam C, Cetinkaya M, Bedir O, Gnal A, et al. Well-known but rare pathogen in neonates: Listeria monocytogenes. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16:58–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gasanov U, Hughes D, Hansbro PM. Methods for the isolation and identification of listeria spp. and listeria monocytogenes: a review. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29(5):851–875. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sisó C, Goncé A, Bosch J, Salvia MD, Hernández S, Figueras F. Listeriosis in pregnancy: a secular trend in a tertiary referral hospital in Barcelona. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(9):2125–2132. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1545-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kessler SL, Dajani AS. Listeria meningitis in infants and children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990;9:61–63. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199001000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hof H. An update on the medical management of listeriosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004;5:1727–1735. doi: 10.1517/14656566.5.8.1727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Safdar A, Armstrong D. Antimicrobial activities against 84 listeria monocytogenes isolates from patients with systemic listeriosis at a comprehensive cancer center (1955-1997) J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:483–485. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.483-485.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Morvan A, Moubareck C, Leclercq A, Hervé-Bazin M, Bremont S, Lecuit M, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of listeria monocytogenes strai ns isolated from humans in France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:2728–2731. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01557-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Temple ME, Nahata MC. Treatment of listeriosis. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34(5):656–661. doi: 10.1345/aph.19315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Okike IO, Awofisayo A, Adak B, Heath PT. Empirical antibiotic cover for listeria monocytogenes infection beyond the neonatal period: a time for change? Arch Dis Child. 2015;100:423–425. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Janakiraman V. Listeriosis in pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1:179–185. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abdollahzadeh E, Ojagh SM, Hosseini H, Ghaemi EA, Irajian G, Heidarlo MN. Antimicrobial resistance of listeria monocytogenes isolated from seafood and humans in Iran. Microb Pathog. 2016;100:70–74. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.de Vasconcelos BV, Hofer E, Vallim DC, de Castro Almeida RC. Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of listeria monocytogenes isolated from vegetables. Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47:438–443. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2015.11.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li W, Bai L, Fu P, Han H, Liu J, Guo Y. The epidemiology of listeria monocytogenes in China. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2018;15(8):459–466. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2017.2409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li H, Wang P, Lan R, Luo L, Cao X, Wang Y, et al. Risk factors and level of Listeria monocytogenes contamination of raw pork in retail markets in China. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1090. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kang J, Burall L, Mammel MK, Datta AR. Global transcriptomic response of listeria monocytogenes during growth on cantaloupe slices. Food Microbiol. 2019;77:192–201. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Salazar JK, Sahu SN, Hildebrandt IM, Zhang L, Qi Y, Liggans G, et al. Growth kinetics of listeria monocytogenes in cut produce. J Food Prot. 2017;80(8):1328–1336. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data are not publicly available, but as the medical staff at the hospital, we have access to it. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from BMC Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES